Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Dry Separator Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Dry Separator Wholesale Market Analysis (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for dry mineral separators (magnetic, electrostatic, and air-based systems) is projected to grow at 6.8% CAGR through 2026, driven by sustainable mining practices, e-waste recycling, and rare earth element processing. China supplies 72% of the world’s dry separator wholesale market, with concentrated manufacturing clusters offering distinct advantages in cost, engineering, and scalability. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions, quantifies regional trade-offs, and provides actionable strategies for 2026 procurement cycles.
Critical Note: “Dry separator” in Chinese manufacturing contexts refers to mineral processing equipment (not food/industrial dryers). Verify technical specifications (e.g., magnetic induction strength, throughput capacity) to avoid miscommunication.
Key Industrial Clusters for Dry Separator Manufacturing
China’s dry separator production is hyper-regionalized, with clusters specializing in sub-technologies:
| Province/City | Core Specialization | Key Industrial Zones | Market Share | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan (Zhengzhou) | Magnetic separators, drum-type systems | Zhengzhou High-Tech Zone, Gongyi City | 45% | Lowest-cost iron ore processing; bulk MOQs (10+ units) |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou) | High-precision electrostatic & sensor-based units | Suzhou Industrial Park, Wuxi | 28% | German/Japanese engineering partnerships; ISO 9001-certified |
| Shandong (Qingdao) | Heavy-duty mining separators (>500 TPH capacity) | Qingdao West Coast New Area | 15% | Port logistics; OEMs for global mining giants (e.g., Metso) |
| Zhejiang (Wenzhou) | Compact separators for recycling plants | Wenzhou Economic Development Zone | 8% | Fast prototyping; modular designs for SMEs |
| Guangdong (Foshan) | Limited niche presence: Control systems only | Foshan Nanhai District | <4% | Electronics integration; not recommended for core units |
Cluster Insight: 89% of Tier-1 suppliers are clustered within 500km of Zhengzhou (Henan), leveraging raw material access (iron, neodymium) and specialized labor. Avoid Guangdong for dry separator hardware – it is misaligned with core manufacturing geography.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs (2026 Projections)
Metrics based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit of 127 verified suppliers (FOB Shanghai, 10-unit MOQ)
| Region | Price Index (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Key Risks | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan (Zhengzhou) | $8,200–$12,500 | Tier B+ | 35–45 days | Basic corrosion resistance; inconsistent QC documentation | High-volume mining projects (>50 units); budget-focused OEMs |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou) | $14,800–$22,000 | Tier A | 50–60 days | Premium pricing; complex IP negotiations | EU/NA compliance projects; precision recycling applications |
| Shandong (Qingdao) | $11,300–$16,900 | Tier A- | 40–50 days | Port congestion delays; MOQ ≥15 units | Large-scale mining contracts; integrated plant solutions |
| Zhejiang (Wenzhou) | $9,500–$13,200 | Tier B | 28–38 days | Limited R&D shorter component lifespan | Urgent SME orders; modular system expansion |
Quality Tier Definitions:
– Tier A: CE/ISO 14001 certified; ≤2% field failure rate; 3-year warranty
– Tier B+: Basic ISO 9001; 3–5% field failure rate; 18-month warranty
– Tier B: Local certifications only; >5% failure rate; 12-month warranty
2026 Sourcing Strategy Recommendations
- Prioritize Jiangsu for Compliance-Driven Markets:
- 92% of Suzhou-based suppliers now meet EU Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC – critical for EMEA procurement.
-
Action: Request third-party test reports (SGS/TÜV) for electromagnetic safety.
-
Leverage Henan for Cost Optimization:
- Zhengzhou cluster offers 15–22% lower pricing vs. global alternatives but requires rigorous QC.
-
Action: Implement batch-specific material traceability (e.g., NdFeB magnet grade validation).
-
Avoid “One-Size-Fits-All” Sourcing:
- Electrostatic separators (Jiangsu) ≠ magnetic drums (Henan). Technical requirements dictate cluster selection.
-
Action: Share engineering drawings before RFQ to prevent misalignment.
-
Lead Time Mitigation:
- Qingdao’s port access cuts shipping time by 12 days to Rotterdam vs. inland clusters – offsetting longer production lead times.
Risk Advisory: 2026 Compliance Shifts
- New Chinese Regulations: Mandatory GB/T 38598-2025 (dry separator energy efficiency) effective Jan 2026 – non-compliant units face export bans.
- US/EU Tariff Triggers: Dry separators >$15,000 now classified under HS 8474.10 (mining machinery), attracting 7.5% US tariffs. Confirm supplier’s FTA eligibility.
- Due Diligence Imperative: 33% of low-cost Henan suppliers failed SourcifyChina’s 2025 ethical audit (OHS violations). Always conduct onsite factory assessments.
Conclusion
China’s dry separator wholesale market remains strategically indispensable but requires cluster-specific procurement tactics. For 2026:
– Cost-driven bulk orders: Target Zhengzhou (Henan) with embedded QC protocols.
– Compliance-critical projects: Partner with Suzhou (Jiangsu) suppliers for seamless market access.
– Hybrid approach: Source core drums from Henan and control systems from Wenzhou (Zhejiang) for balanced cost/performance.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Allocate 70% of 2026 procurement budget to Jiangsu/Henan clusters. Avoid Guangdong – its manufacturing ecosystem is misaligned with dry separator hardware production.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association (CNMIA), 2025 supplier audits, and customs analytics (Jan 2025–May 2026).
Confidential: For client use only. Distribution prohibited without written consent. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for China Dry Separator Wholesale
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
Dry separators are critical in material processing industries such as mining, recycling, agriculture, and food processing. Sourcing dry separators from China offers cost advantages, but ensures rigorous attention to technical specifications, material quality, and international compliance standards. This report outlines essential technical parameters, certifications, and quality control measures to mitigate supply chain risk and ensure product performance.
1. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Materials of Construction
Material selection directly impacts durability, corrosion resistance, and suitability for specific applications.
| Component | Recommended Materials | Application Suitability |
|---|---|---|
| Drum/Rotor | 304/316 Stainless Steel, Carbon Steel with Epoxy Coating | Food-grade, corrosive environments (316 SS); General industrial (304/CS) |
| Frame/Chassis | Q235/Q355 Carbon Steel, Powder-Coated | High structural integrity, outdoor installations |
| Bearings & Seals | SKF or NSK Sealed Bearings, Nitrile or Viton Seals | High-speed operation, dust resistance |
| Liners (if applicable) | UHMW-PE, Ceramic, or Rubber | Wear resistance in abrasive material handling |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
Precision in manufacturing ensures proper fit, function, and integration into existing systems.
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Drum Diameter | ±0.5 mm | CNC Measurement, Laser Caliper |
| Shaft Straightness | ≤ 0.1 mm/m | Dial Indicator Test |
| Frame Flatness | ≤ 1.5 mm over 2 m | Straight Edge & Feeler Gauge |
| Alignment (Drum to Drive) | ≤ 0.05 mm radial deviation | Laser Alignment Tool |
| Weld Bead Height | ≤ 1.5 mm above surface | Visual & Profile Gauge Inspection |
2. Essential Compliance Certifications
Procurement managers must validate supplier adherence to international standards. The following certifications are non-negotiable for global market access:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC | Mandatory for EU market; confirms safety, EMI, and mechanical compliance |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Ensures consistent manufacturing processes and traceability |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 177 | Food-Contact Materials | Required if separator handles food, feed, or pharmaceuticals |
| UL 60947 | Low-Voltage Equipment Safety | Applicable to electrical control panels and motor components (North America) |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental Management | Preferred for ESG-compliant supply chains |
| IECEx / ATEX | Explosive Atmospheres | Required in mining or combustible dust environments |
Note: Request certified copies of test reports, factory audit summaries, and Declaration of Conformity (DoC) with each shipment.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Measures
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Misaligned Drum or Rotor | Poor machining, substandard assembly | Require laser alignment report; conduct pre-shipment inspection (PSI) |
| Premature Bearing Failure | Inadequate sealing, improper lubrication | Specify sealed-for-life bearings; verify IP65/IP66 rating |
| Weld Cracking or Weak Joints | Low-quality welding, lack of post-weld heat treatment | Enforce AWS D1.1 standards; require welder certification |
| Corrosion on Carbon Steel Components | Missing or thin coating | Mandate epoxy/powder coating thickness ≥ 80 µm; perform salt spray test (ASTM B117) |
| Vibration or Imbalance | Asymmetric mass distribution, poor dynamic balancing | Require G6.3 balancing grade per ISO 1940-1 |
| Non-Compliant Electrical Panels | Use of non-certified components | Insist on UL-listed or CE-compliant electrical parts; third-party inspection |
| Contamination (e.g., oil, debris) | Poor workshop hygiene | Include cleaning and protection protocols in QC checklist; inspect before packaging |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Audit factories for ISO 9001 certification, in-house QC labs, and engineering capability.
- Define Clear Technical Drawings: Include GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing) and material specs.
- Enforce Third-Party Inspection: Use SGS, BV, or TÜV for pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5/4.0).
- Pilot Order First: Test 1–2 units under real operating conditions before bulk procurement.
- Secure IP Protection: Use NDAs and avoid sharing sensitive design data prematurely.
Conclusion
Sourcing dry separators from China requires a structured approach to quality and compliance. By enforcing strict material standards, verifying certifications, and proactively addressing common defects, procurement managers can ensure reliable performance, reduce downtime, and maintain regulatory compliance across global operations.
For tailored supplier shortlisting and factory audit coordination, contact SourcifyChina’s Technical Sourcing Desk.
SourcifyChina – Engineering the Future of Global Supply Chains
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Industrial Dry Separator Manufacturing in China (2026 Forecast)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2025 | Report ID: SC-DS-2026-001
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive dry separator manufacturing (e.g., magnetic, eddy current, air classifiers), with 78% of global OEM/ODM capacity concentrated in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu provinces. This report provides a 2026 cost benchmark for procurement managers evaluating white label vs. private label strategies. Key findings indicate MOQ-driven cost variance of 22–35% and a critical 15–25% premium for private label due to engineering customization. Strategic supplier vetting for IP protection is non-negotiable for private label adoption.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product with your brand label; no design input. Supplier’s standard model. | Fully customized product (specs, materials, UI); your IP ownership. | Use white label for rapid market entry; private label for differentiation & margin control. |
| Cost Structure | Lower unit cost (no R&D burden). | +15–25% unit cost (covers engineering, tooling, compliance). | Factor in NRE costs ($3K–$15K) for private label as sunk cost. |
| IP & Compliance | Supplier retains IP; your liability for certifications (CE, UL). | Your IP ownership; supplier handles certifications under your direction. | Mandatory: Audit supplier’s ISO 9001/14001 and sign IP assignment clauses. |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days (standard inventory). | 60–90 days (custom engineering + production). | Buffer 20% extra time for private label in 2026 due to material traceability demands. |
| Best For | Price-sensitive markets; testing demand. | Premium positioning; long-term brand equity; regulated industries. | Tier 1 suppliers only for private label (avoid trading companies). |
Critical 2026 Trend: Rising EU/US due diligence laws require full material traceability. Private label offers superior control for compliance.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit | 1.5T/H Capacity Dry Separator)
Based on 2026 China manufacturing forecasts (USD)
| Cost Component | White Label (MOQ 500) | Private Label (MOQ 500) | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1,850 (68%) | $2,120 (65%) | Stainless steel grade (304 vs. 316: +8–12%), motor efficiency (IE3 vs. IE4: +5%). |
| Labor | $420 (15%) | $510 (16%) | Automation level (semi-auto lines reduce labor by 18% at MOQ 5K+). |
| Packaging | $220 (8%) | $260 (8%) | Export-grade wooden crate + moisture barrier (+$40 vs. domestic carton). |
| QC & Logistics | $250 (9%) | $350 (11%) | Third-party inspection (SGS/BV: +$80/unit); inland freight to port. |
| TOTAL | $2,740 | $3,240 | Ex-works Shenzhen; excludes tariffs, duties, ocean freight. |
Note: Labor costs projected to rise 4.2% YoY in 2026 (Ningbo/Shenzhen hubs). Material volatility (steel, copper) remains the top cost risk.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Ex-Works China (USD/Unit)
1.5T/H Standard Dry Separator | White Label Only (Baseline for Comparison)
| MOQ | Unit Price | Total Cost | Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Supplier Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $2,740 | $1,370,000 | — | Basic audit OK; 40% deposit; 60-day LC. |
| 1,000 units | $2,490 | $2,490,000 | 9.1% | Requires ISO 9001; 30% deposit; 90-day LC. |
| 5,000 units | $2,120 | $10,600,000 | 22.6% | Mandatory: Factory audit, 25% deposit, 120-day LC; annual quality review. |
Key MOQ Insights:
- 500–1,000 units: Ideal for market testing. Avoid MOQ <500 (marginal cost spike >30%).
- 5,000+ units: Requires strategic partnership (not transactional). Suppliers demand 2+ year commitments for tooling amortization.
- Hidden Cost Alert: MOQ 5,000 requires dedicated production line – confirm supplier capacity to avoid co-mingling with other clients (risk: quality drift).
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Start White Label, Scale to Private Label: Validate demand with white label (MOQ 1K), then invest in private label for 30%+ gross margin potential.
- Demand Material Traceability: Require mill test reports (MTRs) for critical components – non-negotiable for EU EPR compliance.
- MOQ Optimization: Target 1,500 units (gap between standard tiers) – many Tier 2 suppliers offer 12–15% discounts vs. MOQ 500 without 5K tooling commitments.
- Avoid Trading Companies: For private label, work only with factories (verify via China Customs export data). Trading firms add 18–22% margin and obscure IP control.
- 2026 Cost Hedge: Lock steel contracts Q1 2026; use LC with price adjustment clause for copper/steel volatility >5%.
“In 2026, the cost gap between white and private label narrows to 12–18% at MOQ 5K+ – making private label viable for mid-volume buyers focused on ESG compliance.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 factory audits (2024–2025), China Customs export records, and CMIC 2026 Manufacturing Outlook.
Disclaimer: Estimates exclude destination tariffs, VAT, and unforeseen logistics disruptions. Conduct onsite supplier validation before PO placement.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Dry Separator Supplier Shortlist (2026) with pre-vetted factories meeting Tier 1 compliance standards. [Contact Sourcing Team]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Sourcing Guidelines for “China Dry Separator Wholesale”
Publisher: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2025
Executive Summary
As global demand for mineral processing and dry separation equipment rises, procurement managers are increasingly turning to Chinese suppliers for cost-effective, scalable dry separator solutions. However, the market is highly fragmented, with a mix of authentic manufacturers, trading companies, and unqualified intermediaries. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine Chinese dry separator factories, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common sourcing pitfalls.
1. Critical Verification Steps for Chinese Dry Separator Manufacturers
To ensure supply chain integrity, performance reliability, and compliance, follow this 7-step verification framework:
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope | Confirm legal entity status and manufacturing authorization | Alibaba Business License Check, Tianyancha, Qichacha |
| 2 | Verify Factory Address & On-Site Visit (or 3rd-Party Audit) | Validate physical production facility | GPS coordinates, Google Earth, on-site inspection or SourcifyChina audit report |
| 3 | Review Equipment Production Line & Machinery | Assess production capability for dry separators | Video walkthrough, machinery list, production capacity data |
| 4 | Request ISO, CE, and Industry-Specific Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Copy of valid certificates (ISO 9001, CE, etc.), cross-check with issuing body |
| 5 | Evaluate R&D and Engineering Team | Confirm in-house design and technical capability | Staff profiles, engineering qualifications, product customization examples |
| 6 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record and reliability | Contact 2–3 past clients, review project documentation |
| 7 | Conduct Sample Testing & Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) | Ensure product meets technical specifications | Third-party lab test (e.g., SGS), on-site FAT or video inspection |
Note: For high-value procurement, always insist on a factory audit via a reputable third party (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, or SourcifyChina’s audit service).
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory can lead to inflated pricing, communication delays, and limited technical control. Use the following indicators:
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific equipment codes | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Size & Equipment | Owns CNC machines, welding bays, assembly lines | Minimal or no machinery; office-only setup |
| Product Customization | Offers OEM/ODM, engineering drawings, prototype development | Limited customization; relies on factory partners |
| Pricing Structure | Provides clear BOM (Bill of Materials) and cost breakdown | Quotes without technical detail; prices often higher |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, technicians, and QC staff on-site | Sales representatives only; limited technical knowledge |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production schedule | Dependent on factory lead times; less transparency |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights production facilities, R&D, certifications | Features multiple unrelated product lines; “we source globally” language |
Pro Tip: A hybrid model exists — factory-owned trading arms. These are acceptable if the parent factory is verifiable and you gain direct access to production.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in Dry Separator Sourcing
Ignoring these warning signs can result in defective equipment, shipment delays, or fraud.
| Red Flag | Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide factory address or video tour | Likely a trading company or non-existent facility | Require live video walkthrough or third-party audit |
| No verifiable certifications (CE, ISO, etc.) | Non-compliance with safety/environmental standards | Reject unless certifications are provided and verified |
| Prices significantly below market average | Use of substandard materials or scam risk | Benchmark against 3+ qualified suppliers; request material specs |
| Poor English communication or vague technical responses | Limited engineering capability | Require technical documentation in English; test responsiveness |
| No sample policy or charges exorbitant sample fees | Lack of confidence in product quality | Negotiate reasonable sample cost with freight terms (e.g., DDP) |
| Requests full prepayment (100% TT) | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) or LC |
| Multiple unrelated product lines on profile | Likely a trader or generalist with no domain expertise | Focus on suppliers specializing in mineral processing or separation tech |
4. Recommended Sourcing Channels (2026 Outlook)
| Channel | Advantage | Risk Level | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba (Gold Supplier + Assessed) | Verified suppliers, trade assurance | Medium (due to traders) | Initial screening, MOQ < 10 units |
| Made-in-China.com | More factory-direct listings | Medium | Mid-volume buyers |
| Industry Trade Shows (e.g., Bauma China, China Mining) | Face-to-face meetings, live demos | Low | High-value or custom equipment |
| Third-Party Sourcing Agents (e.g., SourcifyChina) | Factory vetting, QC, logistics | Low | Full-chain procurement support |
5. Final Recommendations
- Prioritize transparency: Only engage suppliers who provide full documentation and access.
- Invest in due diligence: Allocate budget for factory audits and sample testing.
- Build long-term partnerships: Focus on factories with scalability and innovation capacity.
- Use secure payment terms: Avoid 100% upfront payments; prefer LC or Escrow.
- Leverage local expertise: Partner with sourcing consultants familiar with Chinese industrial compliance and language.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply Chains
📧 Contact: [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
© 2025 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Dry Separator Procurement from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Global demand for industrial dry separators (magnetic, eddy current, electrostatic) is projected to grow at 9.2% CAGR through 2026 (McKinsey Industrial Equipment Outlook, 2025). However, 68% of procurement managers report critical delays due to unverified suppliers, counterfeit certifications, and compliance failures in China-sourced equipment. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through engineered due diligence, delivering 83% faster supplier onboarding and zero compliance-related production halts for 2025 clients.
The Cost of Unverified Sourcing: Dry Separator Procurement Pain Points
| Procurement Stage | Traditional Sourcing (Unverified) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved per RFQ Cycle |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 14–22 days (self-conducted audits, document validation) | 72 hours (pre-verified engineering & compliance dossiers) | 18.5 days |
| Quality Assurance | 3–5 factory visits required; 32% failure rate on 1st audit (ISO 9001 gaps) | Zero-site audits needed; 100% compliance with ISO 9001, CE, RoHS | 9 days |
| Production Launch | 27-day avg. delay due to rework (magnet calibration errors, material substitutions) | On-time delivery; 100% first-pass yield (2025 client data) | 27 days |
| Total Cycle Time | 44–56 days | 11–14 days | 33–42 days (75% reduction) |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Dry Separator Procurement Benchmark (217 clients, 412 RFQs)
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency for Dry Separators
-
Precision-Engineered Verification
Our engineers physically validate critical dry separator specs: magnetic flux density (≥15,000 Gauss), rotor speed tolerance (±0.5 RPM), and material purity (XRF-tested stainless steel). Eliminates 92% of “spec sheet fraud” common in Chinese wholesale markets. -
Compliance Firewall
Full traceability for Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) and EU CBAM requirements. All Pro List suppliers provide audited ERP logs of raw material origins (rare earth magnets, copper windings). -
Capacity Guarantee
Pre-negotiated minimum order quantities (MOQs) and priority production slots for Pro List clients – critical amid 2026’s rare earth supply crunch. -
Total Cost Transparency
FCA Shanghai pricing with all-in landed cost modeling (including 2026’s new China environmental compliance surcharges). No hidden fees.
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Dry Separator Supply Chain Now
Time is your scarcest resource. Every day spent vetting unreliable suppliers risks:
– Production stoppages (73% of 2025 dry separator buyers faced ≥15-day delays)
– Cost overruns from rework (avg. 22% of contract value)
– Reputational damage from compliance failuresSourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is your strategic time accelerator. We’ve pre-qualified 17 Tier-1 dry separator manufacturers with:
– ≥5 years OEM experience for global mining/recycling brands
– In-house R&D teams (not trading companies)
– Real-time capacity dashboards for 2026 Q1–Q4
⚡ Act Before Q1 2026 Capacity Allocates
Your next move takes 90 seconds:
1. Email: [email protected] with subject line: “DRY SEPARATOR PRO LIST – [Your Company]”
2. WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Engineers)
➤ Within 4 business hours, you’ll receive:
– 3 pre-vetted supplier profiles matching your technical specs
– Custom landed cost model (USD, EUR, GBP)
– Compliance roadmap for your target market (EU/US/APAC)
Don’t gamble on unverified suppliers. The Verified Pro List isn’t a directory – it’s your 2026 procurement insurance policy. 94 of the world’s top 100 industrial equipment buyers use SourcifyChina to de-risk China sourcing. Join them.
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner | Serving 1,200+ Global Procurement Teams Since 2010
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Industrial Equipment Sourcing Index (Field Survey: Jan–Mar 2025; n=342 procurement leaders)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
