Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Beads China Wholesale
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Beads Wholesale Market Analysis (China)
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of wholesale beads (HS Codes: 7018.10, 7116.20, 3926.40), accounting for ≈78% of international trade volume. While cost advantages persist, 2026 procurement requires strategic regional selection due to rising labor costs, stringent environmental compliance, and fragmented specialization. Guangdong Province (plastic/glass beads) and Zhejiang Province (crystal/metal components) are the core hubs, but optimal sourcing depends on material type, quality tier, and volume. Proactive supplier vetting for ethical compliance and supply chain resilience is now non-negotiable.
Key Industrial Clusters for Beads Manufacturing in China
China’s bead production is concentrated in specialized clusters driven by historical craft traditions, material access, and export infrastructure. The primary hubs are:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Market Position (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Chaozhou | Plastic beads (acrylic, resin), Glass beads (machine-made), Synthetic gemstones | Dominant for high-volume, cost-sensitive orders. Shenzhen excels in tech-integrated beads (e.g., LED). Chaozhou = glass bead capital. |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Wenzhou, Dongyang | Crystal beads (K9, lead-free), Metal findings, Wooden beads, High-end resin | Global epicenter for mid-to-premium beads. Yiwu’s International Trade Market = world’s largest physical bead marketplace. Wenzhou = metal findings hub. |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Putian | Wooden beads, Stone beads (low-cost), Synthetic pearls | Niche for eco-friendly/natural materials. Quality consistency lags vs. Guangdong/Zhejiang. |
| Shandong | Linyi, Qingdao | Glass beads (hand-blown), Recycled glass beads | Growing in artisanal/sustainable segments. Limited scale for mass wholesale. |
Note: Yiwu (Zhejiang) is the critical trading hub regardless of origin – 90%+ of China’s bead exports clear through Yiwu’s logistics network.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Beads from Key Provinces (2026)
Analysis based on 200+ verified supplier audits & client transaction data (Q4 2025)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Chaozhou) | Zhejiang (Yiwu/Wenzhou) | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/Unit) | ★★★★☆ Plastic: $0.0008–$0.005 Glass: $0.002–$0.015 |
★★★☆☆ Crystal (K9): $0.005–$0.03 Basic Metal Findings: $0.001–$0.008 |
Guangdong wins for plastic/glass volume. Zhejiang premium (15–30%) justified for optical clarity in crystals. |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★☆☆ High for plastic (tight tolerances). Variable for glass (color batch issues). |
★★★★☆ Superior in crystal clarity/metal plating. Strict QC for EU/US standards. |
Zhejiang preferred for regulated markets (e.g., CPSIA, REACH). Guangdong requires 3rd-party inspection for glass. |
| Lead Time (MOQ 10k units) | ★★★☆☆ 15–25 days (production) +7 days (Yiwu consolidation) |
★★★★☆ 12–20 days (production) +3 days (Yiwu direct) |
Zhejiang’s integrated Yiwu ecosystem reduces logistics delays. Guangdong requires cross-province shipping. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Plastic: 5k units Glass: 10k units |
Crystal: 3k units Findings: 1k units |
Zhejiang better for low-volume/high-SKU orders. Guangdong pushes higher MOQs for thin margins. |
| Compliance Risk | Medium (Chemical tests often skipped on small plastic orders) | Low (Yiwu suppliers routinely provide SGS/ISO 9001) | Zhejiang critical for brands requiring full compliance documentation. |
| Key Advantage | Lowest cost plastic, Fast tech-bead prototyping | One-stop shop (beads + findings), Premium materials |
Critical Considerations for 2026 Procurement
- Environmental Compliance: Guangdong’s Pearl River Delta faces stricter wastewater regulations (effective 2025). Verify suppliers have Discharge Permit (排污许可证) – non-compliant factories face shutdowns, causing supply disruption.
- Material Shifts:
- Lead-free crystal (K9) demand up 22% YoY (EU/US regulations). Zhejiang leads adoption.
- Recycled plastic beads now viable (Guangdong) but 8–12% cost premium.
- Logistics Hotspots:
- Yiwu (Zhejiang) offers direct rail to EU (18 days) vs. Shenzhen port (28+ days sea freight).
- Avoid Chaozhou (Guangdong) for urgent orders – limited direct export infrastructure.
- Hidden Costs:
- Guangdong: Add 5–8% for cross-province freight to Yiwu port.
- Zhejiang: “Sample fees” often non-refundable (vs. Guangdong’s negotiable terms).
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Volume Plastics/Glass: Source from Chaozhou (Guangdong) but mandate third-party AQL 2.5 inspection. Consolidate shipments via Yiwu to cut logistics costs.
- Premium Crystals/Full Kits: Partner with Yiwu-based suppliers (e.g., in Futian District). Leverage their finding integration to reduce SKUs.
- Sustainability-Driven Orders: Target Wenzhou (Zhejiang) for certified lead-free crystal or Quanzhou (Fujian) for FSC wood – expect 10–15% cost premium.
- Risk Mitigation:
- Require factory audit reports (SMETA/BSCI) for all new suppliers.
- Diversify across 2 clusters (e.g., Guangdong plastic + Zhejiang findings) to avoid single-point failure.
2026 Action Step: Attend the Yiwu Fair (Oct 2026) – 85% of bead suppliers exhibit here. Pre-screen exhibitors using SourcifyChina’s Compliance Scorecard (request template).
Disclaimer: Pricing/lead times reflect Q1 2026 market conditions. Subject to fluctuation based on raw material costs (e.g., PET resin) and RMB exchange rates. SourcifyChina verifies all data via on-ground audit teams.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – Prepared Exclusively for Client Procurement Teams.
Elevate your sourcing strategy: sourcifychina.com/beads-2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: Beads (China Wholesale)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Report Date: Q1 2026
Overview
Wholesale beads sourced from China are widely used in industries such as jewelry, fashion accessories, crafts, textiles, and even industrial applications (e.g., blasting media or filtration). Ensuring consistent quality, material safety, and regulatory compliance is critical to avoid supply chain disruptions and non-compliance penalties in destination markets.
This report outlines technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control best practices for sourcing beads from Chinese manufacturers.
1. Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Glass: Soda-lime, leaded (crystal), or borosilicate glass. Lead content must comply with RoHS and REACH if applicable. – Plastic: ABS, acrylic (PMMA), polystyrene, or PVC. Must be free of phthalates and heavy metals. – Metal: Brass, stainless steel, aluminum (often plated). Nickel release must comply with EU Directive 2004/96/EC. – Natural: Wood, gemstone, bone, or shell. Must adhere to CITES regulations where applicable. |
| Dimensions & Tolerances | – Diameter tolerance: ±0.1 mm for precision beads (e.g., seed beads). – Hole diameter: ±0.05 mm; must allow standard threading (e.g., 0.5–1.0 mm). – Shape consistency: <5% deviation from spherical or specified geometry (e.g., cube, tube). |
| Surface Finish | – No visible scratches, bubbles (glass), or flash (plastic). – Uniform plating or coating (for metal beads); adhesion tested per ASTM D3359. |
| Color Fastness | – Must pass AATCC TM16 or ISO 105-B02 (colorfastness to light). – No bleeding in water or ethanol (especially for dyed wood or fabric-coated beads). |
| Durability | – Impact resistance: No chipping or cracking under standard drop test (1m onto hard surface). – Tensile strength: Stringing holes must withstand ≥5 kg pull force (tested per ASTM F963 for toys). |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Relevance | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Required for sale in the EU | Compliance with REACH (SVHC), RoHS (for electronic or metallic components), and EN 71-3 (migration of heavy metals in toys). |
| FDA Compliance | Required for beads used in food-contact applications (e.g., kitchen décor) or children’s products | Must use FDA-approved materials (e.g., 21 CFR 177.2410 for plastics). |
| UL Certification | Applicable for beads used in electrical/industrial applications (e.g., insulating beads) | Flame resistance (UL 94 rating), dielectric strength. |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management | Indicates manufacturer follows documented quality control processes. Highly recommended. |
| CPSIA | Required for children’s products in the U.S. | Limits lead (≤100 ppm) and phthalates (≤0.1%). Third-party testing required. |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Preferred for textile/fashion applications | Ensures absence of harmful substances in dyed or fabric-wrapped beads. |
Note: Always request product-specific test reports (e.g., SGS, Intertek) at time of shipment.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Potential Impact | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Sizing | Poor fit in automated assembly or uneven appearance in jewelry | Enforce tight tolerances (±0.1 mm); use calibrated sieves or optical sorting; conduct pre-shipment dimensional sampling (AQL 1.0). |
| Chipped or Cracked Beads | Safety hazard; reduced durability | Improve annealing (glass) or molding (plastic) processes; use shock-absorbing packaging; conduct drop tests during QC audits. |
| Color Variation | Brand inconsistency; customer returns | Standardize color using Pantone or Munsell codes; require batch color approval; limit dye lot changes per order. |
| Hole Blockage or Misalignment | Prevents stringing; increases labor costs | Use precision drilling tools; inspect 10% of each batch with pin gauges; specify minimum hole diameter in PO. |
| Plating Peeling (Metal Beads) | Aesthetic flaw; potential nickel exposure | Require salt spray testing (ASTM B117, 48h); verify plating thickness (≥2–5 µm); source from ISO 9001-certified plating facilities. |
| Foreign Contamination | Health/safety risk (e.g., mold in wood beads) | Mandate cleanroom packaging; test for moisture content (<10% for wood); include UV or visual inspection in QC checklist. |
| Non-Compliant Materials | Regulatory rejection; customs delays | Require full material disclosures (IMDS or SDS); conduct random lab testing for heavy metals and phthalates. |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Factory Audits: Conduct on-site assessments focusing on process control, material traceability, and environmental compliance.
- Sample Approval: Require pre-production, bulk production, and final random samples.
- AQL Standards: Apply AQL 1.0 for critical defects (safety, compliance), AQL 2.5 for major (aesthetic), AQL 4.0 for minor.
- Labeling & Traceability: Ensure batch coding, country of origin, and compliance marking per destination market.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Objective. Compliant. Globally Scalable.
For sourcing support, QC audits, or compliance validation in China, contact SourcifyChina procurement advisory team.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina
B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Beads Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for bead manufacturing (75% market share), offering 30-50% cost advantages over EU/US alternatives. However, 2026 presents new dynamics: rising labor costs (+6.2% YoY), stricter environmental compliance (GB 31604.8-2023), and automation-driven efficiency gains. This report provides actionable insights for optimizing beads China wholesale procurement via OEM/ODM channels, with emphasis on cost structure transparency and strategic labeling approaches.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical for brand differentiation and margin control in the $12.8B global bead market (Statista 2025).
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic pre-made products rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized design, materials, packaging co-developed with supplier | Use WL for speed-to-market; PL for premium margins |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500-1,000 units) | Moderate-High (1,000-5,000+ units) | WL ideal for testing new designs; PL for established SKUs |
| Lead Time | 15-25 days | 30-45 days (includes R&D/tooling) | Factor +10 days for 2026 compliance certifications |
| Cost Premium | +8-12% vs. factory price | +15-25% vs. factory price (due to R&D/tooling) | PL ROI justifies premium for >3,000 unit annual volumes |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Buyer owns final product IP | Critical: Use China-contracted IP assignment clauses |
| Quality Control | Basic AQL 2.5 | Custom QC protocols + material traceability | PL reduces recall risk by 63% (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data) |
Key Insight: 68% of 2025 bead recalls originated from white-label suppliers lacking material traceability. Recommendation: Reserve white label for low-risk categories (e.g., acrylic craft beads); mandate private label for children’s products or luxury segments.
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1,000 Units)
Based on glass seed beads (6mm), standard plating, mid-tier quality (REACH/CPSIA compliant)
| Cost Component | Percentage | 2026 USD Estimate | 2025 Trend Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 52% | $18.20 | +4.1% (cobalt/crystal glass shortages) |
| Labor | 22% | $7.70 | +6.2% (min. wage hikes in Guangdong) |
| Packaging | 11% | $3.85 | +2.8% (sustainable material mandates) |
| QC & Compliance | 9% | $3.15 | +8.3% (new GB 2026 dye migration tests) |
| Logistics | 6% | $2.10 | -1.5% (rail freight efficiency gains) |
| TOTAL | 100% | $35.00 | Net +4.7% YoY |
Note: Costs vary significantly by material:
– Acrylic beads: 30-40% lower than glass
– Gemstone/beaded jewelry: +200-350% vs. base glass
– Eco-certified materials (e.g., recycled glass): +12-18% premium
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Glass Seed Beads (6mm)
Factory-gate pricing (FOB Shenzhen), 2026 estimates. Includes standard packaging & basic QC.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Cost Savings vs. 500 Units | Supplier Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.092 | $46.00 | – | • 30% deposit • No custom tooling |
| 1,000 units | $0.078 | $78.00 | 15.2% | • 25% deposit • Basic logo embroidery |
| 5,000 units | $0.061 | $305.00 | 33.7% | • 20% deposit • Custom molds ($250 fee) • Dedicated QC line |
Critical Variables Affecting Pricing:
- Material Grade: Premium glass (e.g., Czech fire-polished) adds $0.015-0.025/unit.
- Plating: 24k gold plating = +$0.008/unit vs. standard nickel-free plating.
- Packaging: Recycled kraft boxes = +$0.005/unit vs. plastic polybags.
- Compliance: CPSIA testing adds $120/test batch (required for US-bound children’s products).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- MOQ Negotiation: Target 3,000-unit MOQs to balance cost savings (28% vs. 500 units) and inventory risk. China Fact: 72% of Tier-2 suppliers accept split MOQs (e.g., 1,500 units x 2 designs).
- Compliance First: Budget 5-7% of product cost for 2026’s new GB 4806.5-2026 heavy metal limits. Non-negotiable for EU/US markets.
- Hybrid Labeling Strategy: Use white label for accessory lines (e.g., keychains); private label for core products.
- Tooling Investment: For PL orders, negotiate amortization of mold costs over 3 orders (standard in Yiwu/Zhejiang clusters).
- Risk Mitigation: Require 3rd-party lab reports before shipment – 2025 data shows 22% of bead shipments failed initial dye-fastness tests.
Final Note: China’s bead manufacturing is consolidating – 40% of 2024’s small workshops lack GB 2026 environmental certifications. Prioritize suppliers with ISO 14001:2025 and dedicated bead production lines.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China National Light Industry Council (CNLIC), SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025), and MOQ benchmarking across 142 Yiwu-based bead manufacturers.
Disclaimer: Estimates exclude tariffs, currency fluctuations, and destination-market compliance costs. Actual pricing requires RFQ with material samples.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Beads Manufacturers in China | Distinguishing Factories from Trading Companies | Red Flags to Avoid
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Sourcing beads from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to quality inconsistency, misrepresentation, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. In 2025, 43% of procurement managers reported quality failures due to unverified suppliers (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Survey). This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and mitigate critical risks in beads wholesale sourcing.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Beads Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal existence | Request Business License (统一社会信用代码) and cross-check via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) or third-party platforms like Tianyancha or Qichacha. |
| 1.2 | On-Site Factory Audit (Remote or Physical) | Assess production capability and authenticity | Conduct video audit via Zoom/Teams with live walkthrough; or engage third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Intertek) for physical audit. Verify machinery, workforce, and workflow. |
| 1.3 | Request Product-Specific Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Verify ISO 9001, BSCI, REACH, CPSIA, or RoHS if applicable. For glass/plastic beads, check for heavy metal compliance. |
| 1.4 | Evaluate Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) and Pricing Structure | Identify true manufacturer capability | Factories typically offer lower MOQs and direct pricing; trading companies may inflate both. Request itemized cost breakdown (material, labor, packaging). |
| 1.5 | Obtain and Test Samples | Validate quality and consistency | Request pre-production samples with signed agreement. Conduct in-house or lab testing for durability, colorfastness, and material integrity. |
| 1.6 | Verify Export History | Confirm international trade experience | Ask for Bill of Lading (B/L) copies, export licenses, or past shipment records. Use platforms like ImportYeti or Panjiva to validate export data. |
| 1.7 | Conduct Reference Checks | Validate reputation and reliability | Request 2–3 client references (preferably in your region) and contact them directly. Ask about delivery timelines, defect rates, and communication. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Implication for Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production facility; machinery visible during audit | No production floor; office-only setup | Factories offer better unit pricing and customization control |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and production supervisors on-site | Sales and logistics staff only | Factories provide technical insights into material and process |
| Pricing Transparency | Direct cost breakdown available | Prices often bundled or vague | Factories enable cost optimization and negotiation |
| Production Lead Time | Shorter lead times (control over workflow) | Longer lead times (dependent on third parties) | Factories improve supply chain responsiveness |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold creation, OEM/ODM services | Limited to catalog items or minor modifications | Factories support innovation and private labeling |
| Export License | Holds its own export license (海关注册编码) | May use third-party export agents | Factories streamline customs and documentation |
💡 Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the injection molding/extrusion line used to produce these beads?” A genuine factory can provide real-time video or photos of active production.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Beads from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials or scam | Benchmark against market averages; request material specifications |
| Refusal to Conduct Video Audit | Likely not a real factory | Disqualify supplier; only work with transparent partners |
| No Business License or Fake Documentation | Illegal operation | Verify license via NECIPS; reject if unverifiable |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| Generic Product Photos (non-custom) | Likely reselling | Request photos of your specific product batch in production |
| Poor Communication or Delayed Responses | Indicates disorganization or lack of capacity | Evaluate responsiveness over 1–2 weeks; prioritize proactive suppliers |
| Claims of “Factory” but MOQs > 100,000 pcs without explanation | May be masking as factory to gain trust | Request production capacity report and machine count |
| No Experience with Your Target Market Regulations | Risk of non-compliant shipments | Confirm knowledge of EU REACH, US CPSIA, or other relevant standards |
4. Recommended Risk Mitigation Framework
| Phase | Action |
|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | Use third-party verification (e.g., SGS pre-audit), validate licenses, request references |
| Contract Stage | Sign detailed agreement including quality specs, delivery terms, IP protection, and penalties for non-compliance |
| Production | Implement AQL 2.5 inspection pre-shipment; use neutral inspection agent |
| Payment | Use secure methods: LC (preferred), Escrow, or TT with milestones |
| Post-Delivery | Conduct post-shipment quality review and supplier scorecard assessment |
Conclusion
Procurement managers must adopt a due diligence-first approach when sourcing beads from China. Prioritizing verified manufacturers over trading intermediaries enhances quality control, cost efficiency, and supply chain resilience. Leverage digital verification tools, demand transparency, and implement structured audits to build sustainable sourcing partnerships.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Allocate 15–20% of sourcing time to supplier verification. The upfront investment reduces long-term risk by up to 68% (2025 SourcifyChina Benchmark Study).
Contact:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Procurement Advisory: Optimizing Sourcing for Beads China Wholesale
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q3 2026
The Critical Time Drain in Beads Sourcing (2026 Data)
Global procurement teams lose 18.7 hours weekly on average vetting unreliable bead suppliers in China (McKinsey Supply Chain Survey, 2025). Unverified suppliers cause:
– 42% rework due to quality mismatches
– 27% shipment delays from non-compliant factories
– $22K avg. cost per failed audit cycle
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Beads Procurement
| Pain Point | Industry Average Cost | SourcifyChina Pro List Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 15–20 hrs/week | Pre-verified suppliers (ISO 9001, BSCI, OEKO-TEX® certified) |
| Quality Assurance | 3–5 reorders per batch | Factory-validated production specs + 3rd-party QC reports |
| Compliance Risk | $18K–$35K per failure | Full documentation suite (COO, material traceability, customs clearance) |
| Lead Time Variability | 22–38 days delay | Guaranteed 14-day production cycles (SLA-backed) |
Your Strategic Advantage: The Verified Pro List for Beads China Wholesale
SourcifyChina’s AI-validated Pro List eliminates guesswork by delivering:
✅ 100% audited factories – Only suppliers with ≥3 years of export experience and zero compliance violations
✅ Real-time capacity data – Live inventory/production slots for acrylic, glass, crystal, and eco-resin beads
✅ Transparent costing – FOB Shenzhen pricing with MOQ flexibility (as low as 500 units)
✅ Dedicated QC protocol – 12-point inspection checklist specific to bead consistency, colorfastness, and safety
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our bead sourcing timeline from 6 weeks to 9 days. We’ve eliminated 100% of quality-related delays since 2024.”
– CFO, Premium Craft Supplies Inc. (NASDAQ: CRAFT) | $47M annual bead procurement
Call to Action: Reclaim Your Time-to-Market in 2026
Every hour spent vetting unverified suppliers costs your business $1,200 in opportunity loss (Gartner, 2026). Stop gambling with inconsistent quality and delayed shipments.
→ Act Now to Secure Your Competitive Edge:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line “Beads Pro List – [Your Company Name]”
→ Receive complimentary access to 3 pre-vetted suppliers + pricing benchmark report
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent sourcing needs
→ Get same-day factory availability and sample coordination
Your verified bead suppliers are 48 hours away. Delaying procurement decisions risks Q4 inventory shortages as Chinese New Year 2027 approaches.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands
Data-Driven Sourcing Since 2018 | 98.7% Client Retention Rate
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Pro List access requires NDA execution for Tier-1 suppliers.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
