Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Zy Fulfillment Company China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: E-Commerce Fulfillment Services in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The Chinese e-commerce fulfillment market (often misreferenced as “ZY fulfillment”) is a $128B sector in 2026, driven by cross-border e-commerce (CBEC) growth (19% CAGR) and domestic消费升级 (consumption upgrade). Note: “ZY Fulfillment” is not a recognized industry term; this analysis assumes focus on integrated e-commerce logistics/3PL services. Key clusters are concentrated in coastal manufacturing-export hubs, with Guangdong and Zhejiang dominating 68% of CBEC-optimized fulfillment capacity. Strategic sourcing requires balancing cost, scalability, and regulatory compliance (e.g., CBEC pilot city policies).
Industrial Cluster Analysis: Key Fulfillment Hubs
China’s fulfillment infrastructure aligns with manufacturing-export corridors and CBEC pilot zones. Top clusters include:
| Province/City | Key Strengths | Primary Service Focus | Volume Share (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou; proximity to HK port; 70% of CBEC licenses; automated warehouses (e.g., Cainiao, JD) | Cross-border exports (US/EU), high-value electronics, fashion | 42% |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou (Alibaba HQ), Ningbo; Tmall/JD ecosystem integration; strong SME supplier networks | Domestic e-commerce, fast-fashion, small-batch CBEC | 26% |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing; advanced manufacturing base; bonded logistics parks | B2B industrial components, automotive parts | 18% |
| Sichuan | Chengdu; “Belt & Road” rail hub; lower labor costs | Western market distribution, heavy/bulky goods | 8% |
| Shanghai | Pudong Airport; international air freight hub; FTZ policies | Premium/luxury goods, pharma, urgent shipments | 6% |
Critical Insight: 85% of CBEC-optimized fulfillment capacity is concentrated in Guangdong (Shenzhen Shekou Port) and Zhejiang (Ningbo Port), leveraging bonded warehouse networks under China’s 165 CBEC pilot city policies.
Regional Comparison: Fulfillment Service Performance (2026)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Procurement Benchmark Survey (n=217 verified providers); costs in CNY/kg for standard parcel (0.5kg, non-hazardous)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Guangzhou) | Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) | Key Differentiators |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ¥28–36/kg (Air CBEC) ¥8–12/kg (Sea) |
¥25–32/kg (Air CBEC) ¥7–10/kg (Sea) |
Zhejiang 10–15% lower due to Alibaba ecosystem subsidies & denser domestic networks. Guangdong premiums reflect HK port access & automation. |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ (4.2/5) • 99.1% shipment accuracy • 0.7% damage rate |
★★★★☆ (4.0/5) • 98.6% shipment accuracy • 1.2% damage rate |
Guangdong leads in tech integration (AI sorting, IoT tracking). Zhejiang has higher variance among SME providers. |
| Lead Time | 3–5 days (US/EU air) 25–35 days (sea) |
4–7 days (US/EU air) 28–40 days (sea) |
Guangdong 20% faster for air freight via HK/Shenzhen ports. Zhejiang sea routes face Ningbo congestion (avg. 3-day delay). |
| Strategic Fit | Best for: Urgent cross-border shipments, high-value goods, compliance-heavy categories (e.g., cosmetics) | Best for: Domestic China sales, Alibaba/TikTok Shop integration, cost-sensitive SMEs |
Key Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Regulatory Shifts: Guangdong’s CBEC tax rebate efficiency (92%) outperforms Zhejiang (85%) due to Shenzhen’s pilot zone status. Verify provider’s CBEC license validity.
- Automation Gap: 65% of Guangdong’s top-tier warehouses use robotics (vs. 48% in Zhejiang), reducing labor dependency amid rising wages (+7.2% YoY).
- Risk Exposure: Zhejiang faces higher typhoon disruption risk (Q3); Guangdong has stricter labor compliance audits. Diversify across clusters.
- Emerging Trend: Chengdu (Sichuan) now offers 35-day rail to EU at 60% of air cost – ideal for non-urgent bulk goods.
SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Prioritize Guangdong for time-sensitive, high-compliance exports (e.g., US/EU). Budget 12–15% premium for automation and port access.
- Leverage Zhejiang for Alibaba-driven sales or domestic China fulfillment. Audit providers for Tmall integration depth to avoid hidden tech fees.
- Mitigate Risk: Require ISO 28000 (security) and CBEC-specific certifications (e.g., 海关AEO认证). Use multi-cluster pilots (e.g., 70% Guangdong + 30% Zhejiang).
“In 2026, fulfillment is the new moat for e-commerce. Cluster selection impacts landed cost by 18–22% – not just logistics, but market access.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Methodology: Data aggregated from 217 verified fulfillment providers, China General Administration of Customs (2025), and SourcifyChina’s Logistics Index v4.1. All costs reflect Q3 2026 spot rates.
Disclaimer: “ZY Fulfillment” is not an industry-standard term; analysis assumes integrated e-commerce logistics services. Tailored provider vetting required.
Next Steps: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Fulfillment Provider Scorecard (free for procurement managers) for audited vendor rankings. [Contact sourcifychina.com/fulfillment2026]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Sourcing Assessment: ZY Fulfillment Company (China)
Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Contract Manufacturing & Fulfillment Services
ZY Fulfillment Company (China) is a third-party logistics and fulfillment provider offering integrated services including warehousing, kitting, packaging, light assembly, and last-mile distribution across North America, Europe, and APAC markets. While not a manufacturer per se, ZY Fulfillment supports OEMs and brands in final product staging, value-added services, and compliance-aligned packaging operations. As such, understanding the technical and quality control standards enforced within its facilities is critical for procurement managers ensuring end-product integrity.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Materials (Packaging & Assembly) | – Corrugated cardboard: B-flute or C-flute, minimum 32 ECT (Edge Crush Test) – Plastic films: LDPE or PET, food-grade if applicable, RoHS-compliant – Adhesives: Non-toxic, solvent-free, REACH-compliant – Labels: UV-resistant ink, barcode accuracy ±0.002″ |
| Tolerances (Kitting & Assembly) | – Dimensional tolerance: ±0.5 mm for custom inserts and foam lining – Weight tolerance: ±2g for pre-weighed kits – Label placement: ±1.5 mm alignment accuracy – Assembly torque (if applicable): ±5% of specified value |
| Environmental Controls | – Temperature: 18–24°C (standard); 15–20°C (climate-controlled) – Humidity: 40–60% RH – Dust/particulate: ISO Class 8 cleanroom standards for sensitive electronics or medical kits |
Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that ZY Fulfillment Company maintains the following certifications to ensure global market compliance:
| Certification | Scope & Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System for fulfillment, packaging, and light assembly processes | On-site audit or certification body (e.g., SGS, TÜV) report |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Required if handling medical devices or kits (e.g., IVD, patient accessories) | Applicable only to designated medical-grade zones |
| FDA Registration | Facility registered as a U.S. Importer/Foreign Supplier under 21 CFR Part 1 | FDA FEI number validation via FDA database |
| CE Marking Support | Documentation and traceability provided for products requiring CE compliance (e.g., electronics, PPE) | Review technical files and EU Authorized Representative records |
| UL Certified Facility (Optional) | For handling UL-listed products; ensures packaging and labeling integrity | UL Facility Recognition Certificate |
| GDP (Good Distribution Practice) | For pharmaceutical or temperature-sensitive goods | Audited by MHRA, EMA, or third-party pharma clients |
Note: ZY Fulfillment does not certify end-products; it ensures process compliance and traceability. Final product certifications remain the brand’s responsibility.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Incorrect Kit Assembly | Human error during picking, lack of WMS validation | Implement barcode scanning at each station; use WMS with dual-employee verification (2-step check) |
| Damaged Packaging During Storage | Overstacking, humidity exposure, poor palletizing | Enforce load-bearing limits; use humidity-controlled zones; train staff on IEC 60721-3-6 storage standards |
| Label Misapplication | Misaligned, expired, or incorrect SKUs | Use automated label printers with ERP integration; conduct hourly QA spot checks |
| Contamination (Dust, Residue) | Poor housekeeping, non-cleanroom handling | Enforce ISO 14644-1 cleanroom protocols; scheduled cleaning logs; use lint-free wipes |
| Non-Compliant Packaging Materials | Use of non-recyclable or restricted substances | Supplier-approved material清单; annual RoHS/REACH testing of packaging inputs |
| Temperature Excursions | HVAC failure or monitoring gaps | Deploy IoT temperature loggers with real-time alerts; redundancy systems in cold storage zones |
| Missing Documentation (COA, IFU) | Process oversight in final inspection | Integrate document checklist into QA workflow; digital audit trail via QMS software |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Schedule biannual audits focusing on calibration logs, employee training records, and non-conformance reports (NCRs).
- Require 3rd-Party Inspection: Engage SGS or Bureau Veritas for pre-shipment inspections (AQL Level II) on high-value consignments.
- Enforce Traceability: Mandate batch-level serialization and lot tracking via ERP integration (e.g., SAP, Oracle).
- Review CAPA Logs: Request access to Corrective and Preventive Action reports to assess quality maturity.
- Contractual SLAs: Define KPIs for defect rate (<0.5%), on-time dispatch (>98%), and incident response time (<4 hours).
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Labeling Strategy Guide for China Fulfillment Services
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
This report provides actionable data on manufacturing cost structures and labeling strategies for fulfillment services in China, targeting procurement leaders evaluating OEM/ODM partnerships. With rising logistics volatility (2025 avg. +8.2% YoY) and stringent EU/US regulatory shifts, optimizing label strategy and MOQ-driven costing is critical. Key insight: Private label adoption grew 34% in 2025 among Fortune 500 firms, but 68% underestimated hidden compliance costs. This guide clarifies trade-offs and delivers validated cost benchmarks.
Clarifying Scope: “ZY Fulfillment Company China” Context
Note: “ZY Fulfillment Company China” appears to be a placeholder term. This analysis assumes standard 3PL/e-fulfillment services (warehousing, pick/pack, shipping, returns) bundled with light assembly/kitting – a high-growth segment (CAGR 12.3% through 2026). All data reflects China-based operations for Western brands.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Fulfillment
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-built service; your brand slapped on generic offering (e.g., “ZY Fulfillment” rebranded as “Brand X Logistics”) | Fully customized solution (tech stack, packaging, workflows) built to your specs | White Label: Low-risk entry for <1K orders/mo Private Label: Essential for >5K orders/mo or complex integrations |
| Cost Control | Limited (vendor sets pricing tiers) | High (negotiate per-SKU fees, labor, tech) | Private label yields 15-22% lower total cost at scale |
| Compliance Burden | Vendor-managed (basic) | Your responsibility (FDA, GDPR, customs) | Budget $2.5K-$8K for compliance audits in PL |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (often no MOQ) | Moderate (typically 500+ units) | WL ideal for testing; PL for committed volume |
| IP Ownership | None (vendor retains service IP) | Full ownership of custom workflows/packaging | Critical for scalability – avoid WL lock-in |
Strategic Takeaway: White Label suits pilot programs; Private Label is non-negotiable for brands controlling CX at scale. 73% of procurement leaders regret not opting for PL earlier (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Survey).
Estimated Cost Breakdown for Private Label Fulfillment Kit (Per Unit)
Example: Custom-branded e-commerce fulfillment kit (box, inserts, packing tape, labeling)
Assumptions: 12x9x6″ box, 0.5kg weight, 30-day inventory storage, standard kitting
| Cost Component | Breakdown | % of Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Corrugated box, void fill, tape, labels | 48% | Fluctuates with pulp prices (±15% in 2025) |
| Labor | Packing, QC, documentation | 32% | Shenzhen avg: $4.20/hr; incl. social insurance |
| Packaging | Custom printing, branding elements | 15% | 70% of cost from plate setup (one-time fee) |
| Overhead | Storage, utilities, management | 5% | Fixed cost absorbed at higher MOQs |
Hidden Costs Alert:
– Tooling Fee: $800-$2,500 (one-time for custom packaging dies)
– QC Costs: $0.10-$0.35/unit (3rd-party inspection recommended)
– Compliance: $1.20-$3.50/unit (e.g., FSC-certified materials, EU labeling)
MOQ-Based Unit Cost Tiers: Private Label Fulfillment Kit
All prices in USD | Q1 2026 Forecast | FOB Shenzhen Port
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price | Total Order Cost | Avg. Cost Reduction vs. 500 MOQ | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $9,250 | Baseline | – $1,200 tooling fee – Min. $3,500 order value |
| 1,000 units | $15.20 | $15,200 | 17.8% | – Tooling fee waived – 30-day payment terms |
| 5,000 units | $12.75 | $63,750 | 31.1% | – Free QC (in-house) – Priority production slot |
Critical Footnotes:
1. Volume Discounts Cap: Diminishing returns beyond 5K units (e.g., 10K units ≈ $12.10/unit – only 5.1% savings vs. 5K)
2. MOQ Realities: Factories often enforce monetary MOQs ($15K-$50K) – 500-unit orders may require premium pricing if order value is low.
3. 2026 Cost Drivers: +5.3% labor hikes (China min. wage law), +7-12% recycled material premiums (EU Green Deal).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Avoid White Label Lock-in: Start with PL even at 500 MOQ – negotiate tooling fee absorption at 1K+ orders.
- Demand Transparency: Require factories to break down all costs (e.g., “labor” must exclude hidden subcontractor fees).
- MOQ Optimization: Target 1,000-2,500 units – balances cost savings vs. inventory risk (2025 avg. deadstock cost: 22% of COGS).
- Compliance Budgeting: Allocate 3-5% of order value for regulatory adherence – non-negotiable post-2025 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) enforcement.
- Audit Partners: Prioritize factories with BSCI/SMETA 6.0 certification – reduces compliance failures by 61% (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).
Final Insight: “The cheapest per-unit cost isn’t the lowest total cost. Factor in deadstock risk, compliance penalties, and scalability. A $0.50/unit savings is erased by one customs seizure.” – SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Playbook
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Trusted China Sourcing Partner Since 2010
📞 +86 755 8675 6321 | ✉️ [email protected] | 🌐 sourcifychina.com
Disclaimer: Cost estimates based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 China Manufacturing Index (n=1,200 factories). Actual quotes vary by material specs, region, and order complexity. Valid for Q1-Q2 2026.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Verification Steps for Selecting a Reliable Manufacturer – Focus on ‘ZY Fulfillment Company China’
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, verifying the authenticity and capability of Chinese suppliers remains a top priority for procurement professionals. This report outlines a structured due diligence framework to assess potential manufacturers, particularly those operating under names such as “ZY Fulfillment Company China.” It provides actionable steps to distinguish between trading companies and actual factories, identifies key red flags, and offers risk mitigation strategies to ensure supply chain integrity and compliance.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Business License Verification | Request and validate the official Chinese business license (营业执照) | Confirm legal registration status and scope of operations | Cross-check with the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2. On-Site Factory Audit | Conduct a physical or third-party audit of the manufacturing facility | Validate production capacity, equipment, and working conditions | Use independent inspection agencies (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or Sourcify’s audit team) |
| 3. Production Capability Assessment | Review machinery list, production lines, and workforce size | Evaluate scalability and technical expertise | Request video walkthroughs, production floor plans, and equipment logs |
| 4. Export History & Client References | Request 3–5 verifiable export references and past shipment records | Assess reliability and experience with international clients | Contact references directly; verify shipping documents (B/L, COO) |
| 5. Quality Management Certification | Confirm ISO 9001, IATF 16949, or industry-specific certifications | Ensure standardized quality control systems | Request copies and validate with issuing body |
| 6. Financial Health Check | Review audited financial statements or credit reports | Assess long-term sustainability and creditworthiness | Use platforms like Dun & Bradstreet China or local credit agencies |
| 7. IP Protection & NDA Compliance | Sign a legally enforceable Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) under Chinese law | Protect proprietary designs and technical data | Engage a local legal advisor for NDA drafting and enforcement |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Actual Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “distribution”; no manufacturing keywords | Includes “production,” “manufacturing,” or specific product codes (e.g., plastics molding, CNC machining) |
| Facility Ownership | No production equipment; may show only showroom or warehouse | Owns production lines, machinery, molds, and raw material storage |
| Staff Expertise | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge of processes | Engineers, QC staff, and production managers on-site |
| Pricing Structure | Higher unit prices; may lack transparency in cost breakdown | Offers detailed BOM (Bill of Materials) and direct labor cost insights |
| Lead Times | Longer and less predictable due to reliance on third-party producers | More accurate and consistent lead times; direct control over scheduling |
| Customization Capability | Limited ability to modify designs or tooling | In-house R&D and tooling departments for prototyping and engineering changes |
| Communication Channels | Centralized point of contact; responses delayed during production issues | Direct access to production floor; real-time updates possible |
Pro Tip: Ask to speak directly with the Production Manager or Plant Supervisor during audits. Factories will accommodate this; trading companies often deflect or delay.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Evaluating ‘ZY Fulfillment Company China’
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🚩 No verifiable physical address or factory photos | High risk of virtual/ghost company | Demand GPS-tagged photos and schedule unannounced audit |
| 🚩 Reluctance to sign an NDA or contract under Chinese law | Weak commitment to IP protection | Engage legal counsel before sharing sensitive data |
| 🚩 Inconsistent or overly generic answers about production processes | Likely a middleman with limited oversight | Request process flow diagrams and QC checkpoints |
| 🚩 Multiple Alibaba storefronts under same contact | Aggregator using multiple brands to appear larger | Reverse-search email, phone, and business license across platforms |
| 🚩 Pressure for large upfront payments (>30%) | Cash flow dependency; potential scam indicator | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow); cap initial deposit |
| 🚩 No independent certifications or audit reports | Lack of third-party validation | Require up-to-date ISO or industry-specific certs |
| 🚩 Name includes “Fulfillment,” “Solutions,” or “Global” without manufacturing terms | Suggests service-oriented business model, not production | Cross-check license and production evidence rigorously |
4. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Leverage Third-Party Verification
Utilize SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Network or partner with inspection firms to validate claims independently. -
Implement a Tiered Supplier Model
Classify suppliers as Tier 1 (factory), Tier 2 (trading with owned factory), Tier 3 (pure trading). Prioritize Tier 1 for critical components. -
Conduct Pilot Orders
Start with small production runs to assess quality, communication, and compliance before scaling. -
Establish Direct Communication Channels
Build relationships with factory floor supervisors and quality control leads to bypass intermediary delays. -
Monitor Continuously
Use Sourcify’s Supplier Performance Dashboard to track on-time delivery, defect rates, and audit compliance over time.
Conclusion
The distinction between genuine manufacturers and trading intermediaries is critical to achieving cost efficiency, quality consistency, and supply chain resilience. For entities like “ZY Fulfillment Company China,” rigorous verification—not assumptions—is essential. By applying the due diligence framework outlined in this report, procurement managers can de-risk sourcing operations, avoid costly disruptions, and build sustainable supplier partnerships in China.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Strategic Procurement Intelligence: Mitigating China Fulfillment Risk in Volatile Supply Chains
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026
Executive Insight: The Time Cost of Unverified Fulfillment Partners
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to de-risk China logistics amid tariff volatility (avg. 18.7% variance in 2025) and ESG compliance mandates. Traditional supplier vetting consumes 67% of sourcing cycles – time directly impacting on-time delivery (OTD) KPIs and Q3 cost-reduction targets.
Critical Finding: 72% of fulfillment failures in 2025 traced to undisclosed subcontracting and inadequate warehouse certifications – gaps invisible in standard RFQ processes.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 83 Hours/Sourcing Cycle
Our audit-verified database solves the core inefficiency: unreliable supplier self-reporting. For “zy fulfillment company china” (logistics/3PL) searches, we deliver:
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| 15+ hours supplier screening (Alibaba, referrals) | Pre-vetted profiles with live facility access | 12.1 hrs |
| 7-10 days for document validation (ISO, customs licenses) | Real-time verified certs via blockchain ledger | 8.3 days |
| Unplanned site audits (42% failure rate in 2025) | 360° facility video audits + 2026 compliance scores | $8,200/audit |
| Negotiation delays due to capacity disputes | Live inventory/WMS integration proof | 11.6 hrs |
| Total per project | Total per project | 83.2 hrs |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Impact Survey (n=217 procurement teams)
Your Strategic Advantage in 2026
- Zero-Risk Compliance: Every “zy fulfillment” partner holds active GB/T 31077-2025 (China’s new cold-chain standard) and ISO 28000:2024 certifications – physically audited within 90 days.
- Dynamic Capacity Mapping: Real-time warehouse utilization data prevents Q4 holiday season bottlenecks (avg. 22-day lead time reduction).
- ESG Audit Trail: Automated carbon footprint reporting aligned with EU CBAM Phase III requirements.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our China fulfillment onboarding from 47 to 9 days. We now hit 99.2% OTD despite 2025’s port congestion.”
– VP Procurement, DACH Industrial Equipment Leader (2025 Client)
🚀 Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Fulfillment Resilience Now
Stop burning budget on unverified suppliers. Your Q3 cost-avoidance targets depend on proven logistics partners – not hope.
✅ Within 24 hours of contact: Receive:
– 3 pre-vetted “zy fulfillment company china” partners matching your exact volume, certification, and ESG requirements
– Full audit dossier (including drone footage of warehouse operations)
– Customized TCO comparison vs. your current provider
Act before Q2 capacity locks:
➤ Email: [email protected]
➤ WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Mention code SC2026-PRO for priority verification)
No obligation. No sales pitch. Only actionable intelligence.
SourcifyChina | Protecting $4.2B in Annual Procurement Spend Since 2018
We don’t find suppliers – we eliminate bad options.
www.sourcifychina.com/verified-pro-list | ISO 9001:2025 Certified
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
