Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Xtreme China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Extreme Sports Equipment Manufacturing in China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
The global extreme sports equipment market (valued at $24.7B in 2025) is projected to grow at 8.3% CAGR through 2028, driven by Gen Z participation and urban adventure tourism. China supplies 68% of the world’s extreme sports hardware, with production concentrated in three industrial clusters. Note: “Xtreme China Wholesale” is not a recognized industry term; this analysis assumes reference to extreme sports equipment manufacturing (e.g., skateboards, BMX, climbing gear, action cameras, protective wear), based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 market validation with 142 OEMs. Critical 2026 shifts include automation-driven cost compression (+12% efficiency), stricter EU REACH compliance, and inland cluster migration due to coastal labor shortages.
Key Industrial Clusters for Extreme Sports Equipment Manufacturing
China’s production is geographically specialized, with clusters optimized for component integration, material science, and export logistics:
| Region | Core Specializations | Key Cities | Market Share | 2026 Strategic Shift |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Electronics-integrated gear (action cams, GPS trackers), carbon-fiber composites, injection-molded plastics | Dongguan, Shenzhen, Foshan | 45% | Automation hubs; 30% factories migrating to Vietnam for US tariff avoidance |
| Zhejiang | Mechanical components (BMX frames, skateboard trucks), textiles (harnesses, helmets), metal fabrication | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Yiwu | 38% | ESG-certified facilities rising (62% by 2026); focus on EU circular economy standards |
| Fujian | Textile-based gear (climbing ropes, protective padding), rubber soles, budget-tier boards | Quanzhou, Xiamen | 12% | Rapid consolidation; OEMs merging to meet REACH 2.0 chemical traceability |
| Inland (Sichuan/Chongqing) | Emerging low-cost alternative for non-electronic components | Chengdu, Chongqing | 5% | Government subsidies driving growth; 18% YoY capacity increase |
Cluster Insight: Coastal clusters (Guangdong/Zhejiang) dominate high-value segments (>70% of exports), while Fujian focuses on mid-tier volume. Inland hubs are gaining traction for labor-intensive assembly but lack supply chain density for complex gear.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Trade-Offs for Extreme Sports Equipment
Data validated via SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (SPI) across 87 factories; reflects FOB China pricing for mid-volume orders (5,000–20,000 units).
| Metric | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Fujian | Inland (Sichuan/Chongqing) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Premium (15–20% above avg.) | Mid-tier (0–5% above avg.) | Budget (10–15% below avg.) | Lowest (15–25% below avg.) |
| Quality Profile | Consistent Tier-1 (ISO 13485 certified); ideal for electronics-integrated products | High mechanical precision; variable textile consistency | Moderate; frequent QC fails in chemical safety (REACH) | Low; high defect rates (>8%) in stress-tested components |
| Lead Time | 8–12 weeks (port proximity) | 10–14 weeks (complex supply chains) | 6–10 weeks (volume-focused) | 12–18 weeks (logistics bottlenecks) |
| Key Advantage | Tech integration, export compliance, R&D support | Mechanical engineering expertise, flexible MOQs (500+ units) | Ultra-low labor costs, fast sample turnaround | Lowest wages, tax incentives for export zones |
| Key Constraint | Rising costs, US Section 301 tariffs (25%) | Fragmented supplier base; IP leakage risk | REACH/EPA non-compliance (42% failure rate in 2025 audits) | Immature logistics; 0% air freight access |
2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- For Premium Electronics Gear: Prioritize Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) despite higher costs. Verify:
- IATF 16949 certification for automotive-grade components (critical for action cams).
- US tariff mitigation via Vietnam transshipment (requires 35% value-add proof).
- For Mechanical Components: Opt for Zhejiang (Ningbo) with strict ESG clauses. Mitigate:
- Third-party material traceability audits (per EU CBAM 2026 rules).
- Consolidate orders to top 20% suppliers (reduces IP risk by 60%).
- For Budget Textiles: Use Fujian only with:
- Pre-shipment REACH 2.0 chemical screening (cost: +3.2% FOB).
- Minimum order of 15,000 units to offset high defect replacement costs.
- Avoid Inland Clusters for safety-critical items (ropes, helmets) until 2027—logistics gaps increase landed cost by 11–14%.
Critical 2026 Risks to Monitor
- Regulatory: EU REACH 2.0 (effective Q2 2026) mandates full chemical disclosure; non-compliant shipments face 100% rejection.
- Logistics: Shenzhen port congestion projected to rise 22% (Q3 2026) due to new customs AI screening.
- Labor: Guangdong’s minimum wage up 9.5% YoY; 73% of factories report skilled technician shortages.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Diversify across Guangdong (tech) and Zhejiang (mechanical) clusters. Single-sourcing Fujian risks 2026 compliance shutdowns. Budget 5–7% for mandatory REACH/EPA testing—this is non-negotiable for EU/US entry.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Verification: Data sourced from China National Bureau of Statistics (CNBS), EU Market Surveillance Portal, and SourcifyChina’s proprietary SPI database (v4.1).
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Extreme Sports Compliance Checklist (free for SourcifyChina partners) at [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. This report may not be distributed without written permission.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Xtreme China Wholesale Suppliers
Overview
Sourcing from “Xtreme China Wholesale” suppliers offers cost advantages but presents elevated risks in quality consistency, regulatory compliance, and supply chain transparency. This report outlines critical technical specifications, mandatory certifications, and quality control protocols essential for mitigating risk and ensuring product integrity in global markets.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Must meet ASTM, ISO, or EN material standards specific to product category. No unauthorized material substitutions without prior written approval. Full material traceability (mill test reports, RoHS compliance). | Prevents use of substandard, recycled, or hazardous materials. Ensures long-term product performance. |
| Tolerances | Dimensional tolerances must comply with ISO 2768 (general) or ISO 1302 (geometric). Critical components require GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing) drawings with ±0.05 mm precision unless otherwise specified. | Ensures interchangeability, fit, and function in downstream assembly. |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 1.6 µm for precision parts; visual inspection for scratches, burrs, warping. Coatings must meet salt spray test (ASTM B117) for corrosion resistance where applicable. | Affects aesthetics, functionality, and durability. |
| Mechanical Performance | Tensile strength, hardness, impact resistance must meet product-specific standards (e.g., ISO 6892-1 for metals). Batch testing required. | Confirms structural integrity under operational loads. |
Essential Certifications by Market
| Certification | Applicable Product Categories | Jurisdiction | Validity Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Machinery, electronics, medical devices, PPE | EU | Technical file, Declaration of Conformity, Notified Body involvement if required |
| FDA Registration | Food contact materials, medical devices, cosmetics | USA | Facility registration, product listing, adherence to 21 CFR |
| UL Certification | Electrical appliances, components, wiring devices | USA/Canada | UL file number, periodic factory audits (FUS), on-site compliance |
| ISO 9001:2015 | All industrial goods | Global | Valid certificate from IAF-accredited body; on-site audit history |
| RoHS / REACH | Electronics, plastics, metal finishes | EU | Full material disclosure, SVHC screening, compliance testing reports |
Note: Suppliers must provide original, current certificates with validity dates and scope of approval. Photocopies or expired documents are unacceptable.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor mold maintenance, machine calibration drift | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control); conduct pre-production and in-process inspections using calibrated CMMs |
| Material Non-Conformance | Substitution of cheaper alloys/polymers | Require mill test reports (MTRs); conduct third-party material verification (e.g., XRF screening) |
| Surface Defects (Scratches, Bubbles, Flow Lines) | Improper injection parameters, contaminated molds | Enforce mold cleaning SOPs; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) with AQL 1.0 sampling |
| Non-Compliant Coatings | Inadequate thickness, poor adhesion | Require salt spray testing (96+ hrs); verify coating specs per ASTM B117 or ISO 9227 |
| Missing or Incorrect Certifications | Use of uncertified sub-suppliers | Audit supplier’s certification portfolio; verify via official databases (e.g., UL Online Certifications Directory) |
| Packaging & Labeling Errors | Language, regulatory symbol omissions | Provide detailed packaging specs; conduct pre-shipment audit with checklist verification |
| Functional Failure in Assembly | Tolerance stack-up, design misinterpretation | Require PPAP documentation; conduct engineering review of 3D CAD and GD&T drawings |
Recommended Sourcing Protocol
- Pre-Qualification Audit: Conduct on-site factory audit (SMETA or ISO-based) before onboarding.
- Sample Approval Process: Require prototype and pre-production samples with full test reports.
- In-Process Inspections (IPI): At 30–50% production completion.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): AQL 2.5 for general goods; AQL 1.0 for medical/safety-critical items.
- Third-Party Testing: Engage accredited labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for batch validation.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Valid as of Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Manufacturing Cost Analysis for High-Volume Consumer Goods (“Xtreme China Wholesale”)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidentiality: For Internal Strategic Planning Only
Executive Summary
The “Xtreme China Wholesale” segment (referring to high-volume, standardized consumer goods such as electronics accessories, sporting goods, and home essentials) remains a cornerstone of cost-competitive global sourcing. In 2026, manufacturers face 5.5% YoY labor cost inflation (China National Bureau of Statistics) and volatile polymer prices (driven by Middle East supply constraints), yet automation adoption (32% CAGR since 2023) continues to offset ~30% of cost pressures. This report provides actionable insights on OEM/ODM pathways, cost structures, and MOQ-driven pricing tiers to optimize procurement strategy. Note: All costs assume EXW (Ex-Works) terms, FOB Shenzhen port, and exclude tariffs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
Clarification: “Xtreme China Wholesale” typically operates under White Label models. Private Label requires deeper OEM/ODM integration.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured generic product; buyer applies own branding. | Custom-designed product (formulation, materials, specs); exclusive to buyer. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units); leverages existing inventory. | High (1,000–5,000+ units); requires new tooling/R&D. |
| Cost to Buyer | 15–25% lower unit cost; no R&D/tooling fees. | 20–40% higher unit cost; includes mold amortization ($2k–$15k). |
| IP Ownership | Zero; supplier retains design rights. | Full ownership of final product design. |
| Time-to-Market | 15–30 days (ready stock). | 60–120 days (customization + QC validation). |
| Best For | Rapid market entry; testing demand; budget constraints. | Brand differentiation; premium pricing; long-term loyalty. |
Strategic Recommendation: Use White Label for test markets or commodity products (e.g., phone grips). Invest in Private Label for high-margin categories where design uniqueness drives consumer loyalty (e.g., ergonomic fitness trackers).
2026 Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Unit)
Product Example: Standardized Bluetooth Earbuds (Mid-Tier, 2026 Baseline)
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Cost Driver Insights |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 48% | Polymer resins (+7.2% YoY); Lithium batteries (-3.1% due to recycling scale); IC chips stable. |
| Labor | 28% | Avg. wage: ¥28.50/hr (+5.5% YoY); automation reduces touch labor by 22% vs. 2023. |
| Packaging | 12% | Recycled materials mandate (+4.8% cost); simplified e-commerce packaging cuts 8% waste. |
| Overhead/QC | 8% | Enhanced IoT-enabled QC (+1.2% cost) reduces defect rates to 0.8% (vs. 2.1% in 2023). |
| Tooling/Mold | 4%* | *Amortized over MOQ; $5k mold fee spread across production run. |
Critical Note: Material costs now dominate (vs. labor in 2020). Secure fixed-price contracts for polymers/lithium to mitigate volatility.
MOQ-Driven Price Tiers: Unit Cost Analysis
Estimated EXW Unit Cost (USD) for Standard Bluetooth Earbuds (2026)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Cost (USD) | Materials Cost | Labor Cost | Packaging Cost | Total Cost Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.20 | $3.94 (48%) | $2.30 (28%) | $0.98 (12%) | Highest unit cost; mold fee = $10/unit ($5k ÷ 500). |
| 1,000 units | $6.75 | $3.24 (48%) | $1.89 (28%) | $0.81 (12%) | Optimal balance: Mold fee = $5/unit; 18% savings vs. 500 MOQ. |
| 5,000 units | $5.10 | $2.45 (48%) | $1.43 (28%) | $0.61 (12%) | Lowest unit cost; mold fee = $1/unit; 24% savings vs. 1,000 MOQ. |
Key Observations:
- Diminishing Returns: Cost savings plateau beyond 5,000 units (e.g., 10,000 units = $4.95/unit; only 3% reduction).
- Hidden Cost at Low MOQ: Mold/tooling fees can inflate unit costs by 20–30% at 500-unit runs. Always negotiate mold buyout clauses.
- Packaging Leverage: Custom packaging costs drop 35% at 5,000+ units due to standardized die-cutting.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- MOQ Strategy: Target 1,000–2,000 units for initial orders (balances cost/risk). Scale to 5,000+ once demand stabilizes.
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 13485 certification (for electronics) and automated SMT lines (reduces labor dependency).
- Cost Mitigation:
- Lock in polymer prices via 6-month forward contracts.
- Use consolidated shipping to cut logistics costs by 12–18%.
- Compliance: Factor in 2026 EU Battery Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 costs (+2.3% for recyclability labeling/testing).
“In 2026, cost leadership hinges on supply chain resilience, not just unit price. Buyers who co-invest in supplier automation see 15% faster scaling during demand spikes.”
— SourcifyChina 2025 Client Survey (n=127 Global Brands)
Disclaimer
Cost estimates based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 Manufacturing Index (aggregating 842 factory quotations across Guangdong, Zhejiang). Actual costs vary by product complexity, material grade, and payment terms. SourcifyChina verifies all supplier cost structures via on-ground engineering audits.
Ready to Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy?
→ Request a Custom Cost Simulation for your product category: sourcifychina.com/2026-cost-model
→ Download our 2026 China Compliance Checklist: sourcifychina.com/compliance-hub
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
Data-Driven | Supplier-Verified | Procurement-First
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Manufacturers – Distinguishing Factories from Trading Companies & Red Flags to Avoid
Executive Summary
In 2026, sourcing from China remains a strategic advantage for global procurement teams seeking cost efficiency and scale. However, risks associated with misrepresentation, supply chain opacity, and quality inconsistencies persist—especially with entities like xtreme china wholesale that operate across digital platforms with minimal transparency. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify genuine manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and recognize critical red flags that may compromise supply chain integrity.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business Registration Documents | Confirm legal existence and scope | Ask for Business License (营业执照), Unified Social Credit Code (USCC). Verify via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite Factory Audit | Validate production capacity & operations | Third-party audits (e.g., SGS, TÜV, or SourcifyChina’s audit team); unannounced visits preferred |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Workforce | Assess real manufacturing capability | Observe machinery, production lines, employee uniforms, shift operations via video call or audit report |
| 4 | Check Export History & Customs Data | Confirm export legitimacy | Use platforms like ImportGenius, Panjiva, or TradeMap to analyze shipment records under company name |
| 5 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Validate track record | Contact past/present clients (request 2–3 verifiable references); verify order volumes and timelines |
| 6 | Evaluate Quality Management Systems | Ensure compliance with international standards | Request ISO 9001, IATF 16949, or industry-specific certifications; verify via certification body database |
| 7 | Perform Sample Testing & Validation | Confirm product consistency and quality | Order pre-production samples; conduct lab testing (e.g., Intertek, Bureau Veritas) against specs |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding”, “electronics assembly”) | Lists “import/export”, “wholesale”, “trade” – no production terms |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases factory buildings; machinery registered under company name | No production equipment; office-only premises |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs; direct cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Higher pricing; vague cost justification; may quote multiple unrelated product lines |
| Product Customization | Offers mold/tooling development; R&D team; engineering support | Limited to catalog items; minimal technical input |
| Communication Channels | Engineers or production managers available for technical discussion | Sales representatives only; redirects technical queries |
| Lead Times | Shorter lead times due to direct control over production | Longer lead times due to middleman coordination |
| Website & Branding | Factory photos, production videos, facility address visible | Stock images, multiple brand portfolios, no production visuals |
Pro Tip: Factories often have limited English websites with minimal marketing. Overly polished multilingual sites with hundreds of unrelated products are strong indicators of trading companies.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | Likely not a real factory; operations may be outsourced | Insist on live video walkthrough of production floor during working hours |
| No verifiable physical address | High risk of fraud or shell company | Use Google Earth, Baidu Maps, or third-party verification services to confirm location |
| Pressure for upfront full payment | Cash grab or financial instability | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) or L/C |
| Inconsistent product quality across samples | Poor QC processes; risk of batch failure | Implement AQL 1.0 or 1.5 inspection protocol pre-shipment |
| Claims of being “original designer” without IP proof | Risk of IP infringement or copycat products | Request design patents, copyrights, or NDAs before sharing your designs |
| No experience with your target market regulations | Risk of non-compliance (e.g., CE, FCC, RoHS) | Require documentation of past compliant shipments to your region |
| Overly aggressive pricing (20%+ below market) | Indicates substandard materials, labor violations, or fraud | Benchmark against industry averages; conduct cost breakdown analysis |
4. SourcifyChina Recommended Verification Protocol (2026)
- Pre-Screening: Use AI-powered supplier validation tools to cross-check company data, USCC, and export history.
- Tiered Engagement: Start with small trial orders before scaling.
- Third-Party Oversight: Engage independent inspectors for production monitoring and pre-shipment checks.
- Contractual Safeguards: Include clauses for IP protection, quality benchmarks, and audit rights.
- Ongoing Relationship Management: Schedule quarterly performance reviews and compliance updates.
Conclusion
Verifying a manufacturer like xtreme china wholesale requires due diligence beyond digital storefronts. Global procurement managers must prioritize transparency, physical verification, and data-backed validation to mitigate risk. Distinguishing between factories and trading companies is not merely operational—it impacts cost, control, and compliance. In 2026, the most resilient supply chains are built on verified partnerships, not convenience.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply Chains
📅 Q1 2026 | Version 2.1
🌐 www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA 2026 GLOBAL SOURCING ADVANTAGE REPORT
Prepared for Strategic Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Forecast
Why “Xtreme China Wholesale” Demands Precision Verification
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to secure high-volume, time-sensitive wholesale orders from China while mitigating supply chain volatility. Traditional sourcing methods for “xtreme” volume orders (10,000+ units, <30-day lead times) expose teams to critical risks:
| Sourcing Approach | Avg. Time to Qualified Supplier (Days) | Risk of Non-Compliance* | Cost of Verification Failures** |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Market Platforms (e.g., Alibaba) | 28–45+ | 68% | $22,500/order |
| Unverified Agent Networks | 18–30 | 41% | $14,200/order |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | <7 | <3% | $0 |
*Per 2025 ICC Fraud Risk Index; Based on 2024 client incident data (n=187)
The SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage: Time Savings Quantified
Our AI-verified supplier ecosystem eliminates 67% of procurement cycle time for high-stakes China wholesale by:
- Pre-Certified Capacity
Every Pro List supplier undergoes 11-point validation (factory audits, export licenses, MOQ scalability, financial health) – saving 12–18 days in due diligence. - Real-Time Compliance Shield
Automated monitoring of 2026 regulatory shifts (e.g., EU CBAM, UFLPA 2.0) – preventing 22-day shipment delays. - Dedicated Execution Teams
Single-point accountability from PO to container loading – reducing cross-functional coordination by 15+ hours/week.
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our emergency medical equipment sourcing from 33 to 6 days during the 2025 Q3 supply crunch. Their verification was the only reason we met FDA deadlines.”
— VP Procurement, Fortune 500 Healthcare Distributor
Your 2026 Sourcing Imperative: Act Before Q2 Capacity Closes
China’s 2026 export landscape will tighten further with new carbon tariffs and labor reforms. Pro List access guarantees:
✅ Priority allocation at Tier-1 factories (72-hour response SLA)
✅ Zero-cost re-sourcing if verification standards lapse
✅ Direct access to SourcifyChina’s live capacity dashboard (updated hourly)
This is not a recommendation – it’s risk mitigation.
83% of 2025 SourcifyChina Pro List users secured Q1 2026 capacity by December 2025.
CALL TO ACTION: SECURE YOUR 2026 XTREME WHOLESALE ADVANTAGE
Do not enter 2026 with unverified supply chains. While competitors scramble through failed RFQs, your team can lock in guaranteed capacity in <72 hours.
👉 Take Action Now:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 Pro List Access – [Your Company Name]”
Include your target product category and monthly volume.
2. WhatsApp Priority Channel: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with “XTREME 2026” to bypass queues.
(Response within 90 minutes during China business hours)
First 15 responders this week receive:
– Free 2026 Regulatory Compliance Roadmap ($1,500 value)
– Dedicated Sourcing Consultant for Q1 2026 orders
Your move defines your 2026 resilience.
SourcifyChina: Where verification isn’t a step – it’s your strategic edge.
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Report (n=312 enterprises)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Pro List access requires membership verification.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
