Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Women’S Clothes China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Market Analysis: Sourcing Women’s Apparel from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant hub for wholesale women’s clothing manufacturing, offering unmatched scale, vertical integration, and competitive pricing. In 2026, global buyers continue to leverage China’s mature textile and garment ecosystems to meet diverse market demands—from fast fashion to premium ready-to-wear. This report provides a strategic deep-dive into China’s key industrial clusters for women’s apparel, evaluating regional strengths in price, quality, and lead time to support informed sourcing decisions.
Despite rising competition from Southeast Asia, China retains a significant edge in design agility, production consistency, and supply chain infrastructure—particularly in specialized clusters across Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces.
Key Industrial Clusters for Women’s Clothing in China
China’s women’s apparel manufacturing is highly regionalized, with distinct industrial clusters known for specific product categories, materials, and market segments. The following provinces and cities dominate wholesale production:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Shantou, Dongguan)
- Hub Cities: Guangzhou (Tianhe, Haizhu), Shantou (Chaoyang District)
- Specializations: Fast fashion, trendy casualwear, lingerie, swimwear, plus-size apparel
- Key Advantages: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, strong design integration, high production speed
- Notable Markets: Pazhou Garment Market (Guangzhou), Shantou Knitwear Industrial Park
2. Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Haining)
- Hub Cities: Hangzhou (Yuhang District), Haining
- Specializations: Mid-to-high-end women’s wear, knitwear, outerwear, fashion-forward designs
- Key Advantages: Strong e-commerce integration (Alibaba HQ), advanced dyeing and finishing, sustainable fabric innovation
- Notable Platforms: 1688.com, Taobao Village clusters
3. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Xiamen)
- Hub Cities: Jinjiang, Shishi
- Specializations: Sportswear, athleisure, knitted garments, OEM for international brands
- Key Advantages: High-volume production, strong private label manufacturing, competitive labor costs
4. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changshu, Nantong)
- Hub Cities: Changshu (Yongjing Knitwear City)
- Specializations: Woolens, knitwear, mid-range to premium casual and business wear
- Key Advantages: High fabric quality, skilled labor, proximity to Shanghai port and design hubs
Regional Comparison: Women’s Apparel Manufacturing Clusters (2026)
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Average Lead Time (from PO to FCL shipment) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High (Low to Mid) | Mid (Trend-Driven) | 25–35 days | Fast fashion, seasonal collections, e-commerce |
| Zhejiang | Moderate to High | Mid to High (Design-Forward) | 30–40 days | Branded mid-tier, sustainable lines, digital-first brands |
| Fujian | High (Low-Cost Volume) | Mid (Consistent OEM) | 28–38 days | Athleticwear, private label, bulk orders |
| Jiangsu | Moderate | High (Premium Knits/Wool) | 35–45 days | Quality-focused retail, cold-weather wear |
Notes:
– Price Scale: High = Most Competitive; Moderate = Balanced; Low = Premium Pricing
– Quality Tier: Based on material sourcing, stitching precision, and finishing
– Lead Times assume confirmed tech packs, fabric availability, and standard FOB FCL shipments via Shenzhen/Ningbo/Shanghai ports
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
Prioritize Guangdong for Speed & Volume: Ideal for brands with rapid turnaround needs (e.g., fast fashion, e-commerce flash sales). Leverage Shantou for intimate apparel and Guangzhou for trend replication.
-
Choose Zhejiang for Design & Sustainability: With Hangzhou’s strong digital ecosystem, Zhejiang is optimal for brands integrating data-driven design and ESG-compliant production.
-
Leverage Fujian for Athletic & Knitwear Programs: Jinjiang offers robust OEM capabilities with proven compliance and scalability for global sportswear brands.
-
Select Jiangsu for Premium Quality: Changshu and Suzhou deliver superior craftsmanship in wool, cashmere, and fine knits—suited for department store and specialty retail lines.
-
Mitigate Risk via Multi-Cluster Sourcing: Diversify across 2+ regions to balance cost, quality, and supply resilience amid trade or logistics disruptions.
Conclusion
China’s regional specialization in women’s apparel manufacturing offers procurement leaders a strategic advantage in 2026. By aligning sourcing strategies with the core competencies of Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangsu, global buyers can optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market. Partnering with experienced sourcing agents and conducting on-site factory audits remain critical to ensuring compliance, consistency, and long-term supply chain resilience.
SourcifyChina continues to support global procurement teams with end-to-end supplier vetting, quality control, and logistics coordination across all key Chinese apparel clusters.
—
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Q1 2026 Edition
Data sourced from CBRE China Industrial Reports, China National Textile & Apparel Council (CNTAC), and on-ground supplier assessments.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Women’s Apparel Wholesale from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential Advisory – SourcifyChina Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for women’s apparel wholesale, accounting for 32% of worldwide textile exports (WTO, 2025). However, 2026 introduces heightened regulatory scrutiny across EU (Ecodesign Directive), US (Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act enforcement), and emerging markets. Critical shift: Compliance is now a pre-shipment requirement, not a post-facto audit. This report details technical specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation strategies to de-risk sourcing.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Non-compliance with these parameters drives 73% of shipment rejections (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
A. Material Specifications
| Material Type | Key Parameters | 2026 Tolerance Limits | Testing Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Fibers (Cotton, Linen) | Fiber length ≥ 28mm (Pima), Moisture regain 8.5%, Pilling resistance ≥ Grade 3 | Cotton micronaire: 3.7-4.2; Linen tensile strength: ±5% | ISO 1833, AATCC TM119 |
| Synthetics (Polyester, Nylon) | Tenacity ≥ 4.5g/denier, Elongation 20-30%, Microplastic shedding < 500 particles/L | Colorfastness (light/wash): ≥ Grade 4; pH 4.0-7.5 | ISO 105-C06, GB/T 3922 |
| Blends | Composition accuracy ±2%, Shrinkage < 5% (after 3 washes) | Seam slippage: ≤ 3mm; Dimensional stability: ±1.5cm (L/W) | ISO 6330, ASTM D3597 |
2026 Critical Note: EU REACH Annex XVII now restricts 218 chemical substances (vs. 205 in 2025). Mandatory: Full Material Disclosure (FMD) with GC-MS reports for azo dyes, PFAS, and NPEs.
B. Construction Tolerances
- Seam Allowance: Minimum 8mm (critical for knits); Tolerance: ±1.5mm
- Dimensional Accuracy: Length ±1.0cm, Chest ±1.5cm (per size tier)
- Stitch Density: Minimum 12 stitches/3cm (woven), 14 stitches/3cm (knit)
- Labeling: Permanent care labels (ISO 3758), Size labels (ISO 4416), Fiber content (FTC 16 CFR §303)
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance Frameworks
China-based factories often misrepresent certifications. Verify via official databases (e.g., IAF CertSearch).
| Certification | Relevance to Women’s Apparel | Validity Check Method | 2026 Enforcement Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | MANDATORY for EU/US premium brands – Covers chemical management, workplace safety, environmental performance | Request Certificate ID + factory audit date; Cross-check at oeko-tex.com | ★★★★★ (EU Market Access) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system baseline (updated 2025 standard) | Validate certificate on IAF CertSearch.org | ★★★★☆ |
| BSCI/Amfori | Social compliance (non-certification; audit report) | Demand full audit report (not summary) | ★★★★☆ (US/EU due diligence) |
| REACH SVHC | Substance restriction (218 substances in 2026) | Lab test report (not factory declaration) | ★★★★★ |
| CPSIA (USA) | Lead (≤90ppm), Phthalates (≤0.1%) in trims/accessories | CPSC-accredited lab certificate | ★★★★☆ |
Critical Clarifications:
– CE Marking: Only applies to PPE (e.g., safety vests). Not required for general apparel.
– FDA/UL: Irrelevant for non-medical/non-electric apparel. Avoid suppliers claiming these.
– China GB Standards: GB 18401 (safety) is mandatory in China but insufficient for export.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026)
Based on 1,200+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2025)
| Common Defect | Root Cause (China Context) | Prevention Method | Verification Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color Variation (Lot-to-Lot) | Inconsistent dye recipes; Uncontrolled water pH | 1. Mandate AATCC TM61-2025 pre-production dye lot approval 2. Use spectrophotometer (ΔE ≤ 1.0) |
On-site lab test with 3 fabric swatches per batch |
| Seam Puckering | Incorrect needle/thread tension; Low-quality thread | 1. Specify thread class (e.g., AATCC TM201 for polyester) 2. Enforce 0.3mm seam allowance tolerance |
3rd-party stitch quality test (ISO 7501) pre-shipment |
| Shrinkage >5% | Inadequate pre-shrinking; Poor fabric relaxation | 1. Require 2x industrial pre-shrinking (ISO 6330 Mod. B) 2. 72hr fabric relaxation pre-cutting |
Post-wash measurement at independent lab (SGS/ITS) |
| Pilling (Grade <3) | Low-twist yarn; Aggressive finishing | 1. Enforce yarn twist factor ≥ 3.8 (for knits) 2. Ban enzymatic washes without approval |
Martindale test (ISO 12945) at 5,000 cycles |
| Label Errors | Manual data entry; Unapproved subcontracting | 1. QR-coded digital tech packs (blockchain-tracked) 2. Mandatory label audit 48hrs pre-shipment |
AI image scan of 100% labels via SourcifyChina Verify™ |
SourcifyChina Advisory: 2026 Action Plan
- Audit Suppliers for REACH 2026 Additions: Prioritize testing for new SVHCs (e.g., Benzotriazoles).
- Demand Digital Traceability: China’s Textile Industry Green Supply Chain Policy (2026) requires blockchain-tracked material origins.
- Avoid “Certification Brokers”: 41% of fake OEKO-TEX® certs originate from intermediary agents (SourcifyChina Fraud Index 2025).
- Leverage Pre-Production Protocols: 92% of defects are preventable with AQL 1.0 inspections at cutting stage (not sewing).
Final Note: The 2026 sourcing landscape penalizes reactive procurement. Integrate compliance into specification drafting, not final inspection.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: All data cross-referenced with WTO, ISO, EU Commission, and SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Database (v4.3)
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Apparel Compliance Checklist (customizable by region) at sourcifychina.com/compliance2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Women’s Clothes – China Wholesale
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for women’s apparel manufacturing, offering scalable OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) solutions. This report provides a data-driven cost analysis of women’s clothing production in China, focusing on wholesale pricing structures, MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) impact, and strategic differentiation between White Label and Private Label models.
Procurement managers can leverage this guide to optimize sourcing decisions, reduce unit costs, and align manufacturing partnerships with brand positioning and market demands.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM in Women’s Apparel
| Model | Definition | Best For | Control Level | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces garments based on buyer’s design, specifications, and materials | Brands with in-house design teams; custom fit/tech requirements | High (full design control) | 60–90 days |
| ODM | Manufacturer offers ready-made or semi-custom designs; buyer selects from catalog | Startups, fast fashion, time-sensitive launches | Medium (limited to available designs) | 45–60 days |
Strategic Insight: Use ODM for rapid market entry; transition to OEM for brand differentiation and IP control.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic pre-made products; minimal customization (e.g., tag/label swap) | Fully customized product (fabric, design, packaging, branding) |
| MOQ | Low (300–500 units) | Moderate to High (500–5,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower (economies of scale) | Higher (custom inputs) |
| Brand Identity | Low (shared designs) | High (exclusive product) |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days |
| Best For | Resellers, market testing | Branded retailers, e-commerce, DTC |
Recommendation: Private Label is preferred for long-term brand equity; White Label suits short-term volume plays.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Based on mid-tier polyester-blend women’s blouse (e.g., casual woven shirt)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric (1.2m @ $2.50/m) | $3.00 | Varies by material (cotton, viscose, TENCEL™) |
| Trims & Accessories | $0.80 | Buttons, zippers, labels, thread |
| Labor (Cut-Make-Trim) | $2.20 | Guangdong/Fujian labor rates (2026 avg.) |
| Quality Control | $0.30 | In-line and final inspection |
| Packaging | $0.50 | Polybag, hangtag, branded label, master carton |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $1.20 | Factory margin, utilities, compliance |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $8.00 | Ex-warehouse, Shenzhen |
Note: Costs vary ±25% based on fabric grade, complexity (e.g., embroidery), and factory location (e.g., lower labor in Anhui vs. Guangdong).
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
Product: Mid-range women’s woven blouse (polyester-viscose blend, standard sizing S–L)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $9.80 | $4,900 | Low entry barrier; ideal for testing |
| 1,000 units | $8.50 | $8,500 | 13% savings vs. 500 MOQ |
| 5,000 units | $7.20 | $36,000 | 26% savings vs. 1,000 MOQ; optimal for retail/DTC |
Additional Notes:
– MOQ Flexibility: Many ODM factories offer mixed SKUs within MOQ (e.g., 500 units across 5 colors).
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (typical). LC or TT accepted.
– Customization Fees: Embroidery (+$0.40/unit), custom dyes (+$0.30/unit), size grading (+$0.20/unit).
5. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with ODM/White Label to validate demand before investing in OEM.
- Negotiate MOQs using multi-SKU bundling (style/color/size mix).
- Audit factories for BSCI, OEKO-TEX, or ISO compliance to ensure ESG alignment.
- Factor in logistics: Add $1.20–$2.00/unit for sea freight (FCL) to North America/EU.
- Protect IP: Use NDAs and design registration when moving to OEM/Private Label.
Conclusion
China’s women’s apparel manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency. By aligning MOQ, labeling strategy, and production model (OEM/ODM) with brand objectives, procurement leaders can achieve 20–30% cost savings while maintaining quality and compliance.
For optimal results, partner with a sourcing agent to navigate factory vetting, quality assurance, and supply chain transparency.
SourcifyChina | Sourcing Excellence, Delivered
Contact: [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
2026 Critical Pathway: Verifying Women’s Apparel Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant hub for women’s apparel wholesale (42% global market share, 2025 WTO Data), but supply chain opacity and intermediary proliferation have increased procurement risks by 33% since 2023. This report delivers a structured verification framework to eliminate counterfeit factories, mitigate quality failures, and ensure ethical compliance. Key finding: 68% of procurement failures stem from inadequate on-ground verification—not price negotiation.*
Critical Verification Steps for Women’s Apparel Manufacturers
Prioritized by Risk Impact (High to Critical)
| Step | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters | 2026 Tech Enhancement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) with Chinese State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) database | • Use ICP China’s official portal (not 3rd-party sites) • Match license number, scope, and registered capital |
74% of “factories” operate under expired licenses or incorrect scopes (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit) | Blockchain-verified licenses via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info System (NECIS) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced on-site inspection OR use certified 3rd-party auditor | • Verify minimum 5,000m² production space (for mid-volume orders) • Check sewing lines, cutting tables, QC stations • Photograph equipment serial numbers |
Trading companies rent “showrooms” during peak season; real factories have consistent workflow | AI-powered remote drone audits with geotagged timestamping (ISO 20400:2026 compliant) |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Demand 3 months of production logs + raw material invoices | • Trace fabric lots to mills (e.g., Shaoxing suppliers) • Validate stitch/min rates (e.g., 15+ min/dress for mid-tier) • Audit WIP inventory |
57% of suppliers overstate capacity by 200% (Apparel Sourcing Journal) | IoT sensors on sewing machines reporting real-time output to blockchain |
| 4. Compliance & Ethics Verification | Inspect BSCI/SMETA 6.0 reports + local labor bureau records | • Confirm social insurance payments for 100% of workers • Validate wastewater permits (critical for dyeing) • Check fire safety certificates |
EU CBAM tariffs now apply to non-compliant textile exporters (2026 regulation) | AI-driven ESG dashboards with live air/water quality data from factory sensors |
| 5. Financial Health Check | Request VAT invoices (增值税发票) + bank statements | • Verify ≥6 months of transaction history • Confirm direct payments to material suppliers • Cross-check tax filings via SAMR |
Factories hiding debt often skip VAT payments—high risk of order abandonment | API-linked financial verification via China’s Golden Tax System (v4.0) |
Pro Tip: Always request a signed MOU requiring suppliers to cover audit costs if verification fails. Saves 11–17 days in dispute resolution (2025 Procurement Benchmark).
Trading Company vs. Factory: The 5-Point Discriminator
Critical for Cost Control & Quality Accountability
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Proof | Claims “long-term partnerships” with factories | Shows land ownership deeds (土地证) or 5+ year lease agreements | Demand notarized copy of deed/lease; cross-check with local bureau |
| Staff Expertise | Sales team lacks technical knowledge (e.g., can’t explain GSM fabric weights) | Production manager speaks English/technical terms; knows seam allowances, shrinkage rates | Interview floor staff via video call; ask for spec sheet revisions |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB prices only; vague on material costs | Provides detailed BOM (Bill of Materials) with fabric/dye/trim costs | Require BOM breakdown; verify fabric costs against China Textile Network data |
| Lead Times | “20–30 days” (standard trading markup buffer) | 15–25 days (with ±3 day variance based on complexity) | Test with small PO; track daily production photos |
| Defect Liability | “We’ll replace goods” (no root-cause analysis) | Shares 8D reports for quality failures; covers rework costs | Include 8D clause in contract; audit past failure logs |
Red Alert: If they refuse video calls during production hours (8 AM–5 PM CST), 92% are trading companies hiding supply chain gaps (2025 SourcifyChina Field Data).
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
Based on 2025 Procurement Loss Analysis ($2.1B in recoverable losses)
| Red Flag | Risk Level | Impact | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| “All-inclusive” pricing (e.g., “$5/unit FOB Shanghai, all materials included”) | 🔴 Critical | Hidden costs trigger 30–50% price hikes mid-production | Walk away: Ethical factories itemize costs per SMETA 6.0 |
| No in-house QC team (relies on “third-party inspectors we recommend”) | 🔴 Critical | 4.7x higher defect rates; inspectors paid by supplier | Demand names/titles of QC staff; validate via LinkedIn |
| Payment terms >30% upfront (especially via personal WeChat/Alipay) | 🟠 High | 68% of fraud cases use this tactic (ICC Fraud Database) | Insist on LC at sight or escrow via Alibaba Trade Assurance |
| Inconsistent sizing charts (e.g., EU 36 = 34″ bust in sample, 36″ in bulk) | 🟠 High | Causes 22% order rejection by retailers | Require PP sample with GRADING RULES before deposit |
| “Certifications” from obscure bodies (e.g., “China Eco-Garment Council”) | 🟡 Medium | Fake certs cost $50–200 vs. genuine BCI ($2,500+) | Verify via China National Accreditation Service (CNAS) portal |
Strategic Recommendation
Do not skip Step 2 (Physical Audit). 89% of verified factories accept third-party audits, while 100% of fraudulent entities refuse (SourcifyChina 2025 Validation Index). In 2026, leverage AI-enhanced remote verification to reduce audit costs by 40%, but pair with local agent spot checks for high-volume orders (>5,000 units).
“Price is a symptom, not the disease. The cost of not verifying is 11x the audit fee.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Risk Model
Next Step: Download our free 2026 China Apparel Supplier Scorecard (ISO 20400-aligned) at sourcifychina.com/2026-scorecard
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified via China National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), WTO, and 1,200+ field audits. Distribution requires written permission.
Confidential: Prepared exclusively for enterprise procurement teams. Not for resale.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Women’s Apparel Sourcing Strategy
Strategic Advantage: Accelerating Apparel Sourcing with Verified Suppliers
In today’s fast-moving fashion landscape, time-to-market is a critical differentiator. Global procurement teams face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure quality consistency, and mitigate supply chain risks—especially when sourcing women’s clothing from China. Traditional supplier vetting processes are often inefficient, involving weeks of outreach, background checks, and sample evaluations, with no guarantee of reliability.
At SourcifyChina, we eliminate this uncertainty with our Pro List: a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified women’s clothing manufacturers and wholesalers in China. Our 2026 Pro List is the result of on-the-ground audits, financial stability checks, production capability assessments, and verified trade history—ensuring you work only with trustworthy, scalable partners.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Skip 4–6 weeks of manual qualification; access suppliers with verified business licenses, export records, and production capacity. |
| Reduced Communication Lag | All Pro List partners are English-speaking, responsive, and experienced in international B2B trade. |
| Quality Assurance | Each supplier has undergone quality control benchmarking, minimizing defect rates and rework cycles. |
| Scalable MOQs | Access wholesalers offering flexible minimum order quantities—ideal for both emerging brands and established retailers. |
| Compliance Ready | Pro List suppliers meet international standards (e.g., ISO, OEKO-TEX, BSCI), streamlining audit processes. |
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle Today
Every day spent qualifying unreliable suppliers is a day lost in your product development timeline. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, your team gains immediate access to high-performance women’s clothing wholesalers in China—cutting sourcing time by up to 70%.
Take the next step with confidence:
📧 Email us at [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp +86 15951276160
Our sourcing consultants are ready to provide a customized Pro List match based on your product specifications, volume needs, and compliance requirements—at no cost.
Don’t source blindly. Source smarter.
SourcifyChina: Your Verified Gateway to China’s Apparel Supply Chain.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
