Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Tumblers From China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Tumblers from China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory | Internal Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale tumbler manufacturing, supplying >85% of the world’s stainless steel, plastic, and hybrid drinkware. The 2026 market is characterized by consolidation among Tier-1 factories, heightened regulatory scrutiny (especially EU REACH/US FDA), and rising demand for sustainable materials (recycled stainless steel, plant-based plastics). Procurement managers must prioritize cluster-specific due diligence to balance cost, compliance, and innovation. Key clusters in Guangdong (premium) and Zhejiang (volume/value) deliver 75% of export-grade tumblers, while Fujian emerges for eco-materials.
Key Industrial Clusters for Tumbler Manufacturing in China
China’s tumbler production is geographically concentrated in coastal provinces with mature supply chains for metals, polymers, and surface finishing. Three clusters dominate:
- Guangdong Province (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Shantou)
- Specialization: High-end stainless steel (18/8, 304/316), vacuum-insulated tumblers, smart lids (temperature sensors), luxury finishes (powder coating, laser engraving).
- Strengths: Proximity to Shenzhen’s tech ecosystem (for smart features), strict QC adherence (ISO 9001/14001 common), export compliance expertise (FDA, LFGB, CE).
- Weaknesses: Highest labor/material costs; MOQs typically 1,000+ units; lead times extended by complex customization.
-
Key Factories: Hysap (Shenzhen), Sinomax (Guangzhou), Hengxin Houseware (Shantou).
-
Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Ningbo, Wenzhou)
- Specialization: Mid-range stainless steel (201-grade), budget plastic tumblers (PP, Tritan), basic double-wall designs, promotional/custom logo printing.
- Strengths: Unmatched cost efficiency; lowest MOQs (500 units); agile production for fast fashion trends; integrated logistics via Ningbo Port.
- Weaknesses: Variable quality control; limited material innovation; higher risk of non-compliant coatings (e.g., lead in paint).
-
Key Factories: Yiwu Jinhua Houseware, Ningbo Haishatong, Wenzhou Kangjie.
-
Fujian Province (Xiamen, Quanzhou)
- Specialization: Eco-friendly materials (recycled stainless steel, bamboo fiber composites), collapsible silicone tumblers, OEM for EU sustainable brands.
- Strengths: Rising expertise in circular economy materials; competitive pricing for green products; strong textile supply chain for fabric sleeves.
- Weaknesses: Limited scale; nascent export compliance systems; longer lead times for novel materials.
- Key Factories: Xiamen EcoTherm, Quanzhou Greenware.
Regional Cluster Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Benchmarking (2026)
| Metric | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Fujian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $8.50 – $22.00 (premium) | $3.20 – $9.50 (budget/mid-range) | $6.80 – $15.00 (eco-premium) |
| Key Drivers | Aerospace-grade steel, smart tech, 3rd-party certs | Economies of scale, 201-grade steel, plastic dominance | R&D costs for recycled materials, smaller batches |
| Quality Tier | ★★★★☆ (High consistency; <2% defect rate) | ★★☆☆☆ (Variable; 3-8% defect rate; verify coatings) | ★★★☆☆ (Good for eco-materials; inconsistent vacuum seals) |
| Key Risks | Over-engineering for simple orders | Non-compliant dyes/coatings; thin walls | Material batch variations; limited stress testing |
| Standard Lead Time | 35-50 days (45+ days for custom tech) | 20-35 days (rush: 15 days +25% cost) | 30-45 days (40+ days for new materials) |
| Critical Dependencies | Mold complexity; lab testing slots | Raw material stock; printing queue | Material R&D validation; eco-cert processing |
| Best For | Luxury brands, regulated markets (EU/US), tech-integrated products | Promotional merchandise, budget retail, fast-turnaround orders | Sustainable/Eco-brands, niche innovation, EU Green Deal aligned products |
Footnotes:
– Price based on 12oz stainless steel tumbler, MOQ 1,000 units, FOB Shenzhen.
– Quality Rating: Based on SourcifyChina’s 2026 supplier audit data (n=142 factories). Defect rates exclude shipping damage.
– Lead Time: Includes production + pre-shipment inspection. Excludes shipping/transit.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Tiered Sourcing Strategy:
- Use Guangdong for flagship products (prioritize factories with in-house labs for FDA/REACH testing).
- Leverage Zhejiang for seasonal/promotional items (enforce third-party coating tests via SGS).
-
Pilot Fujian for sustainability lines (require material traceability certificates).
-
Risk Mitigation:
- MOQ Flexibility: Negotiate split MOQs (e.g., 50% initial payment for 50% of order) with Zhejiang suppliers to reduce inventory risk.
- Compliance: Demand batch-specific test reports – 32% of Zhejiang factories falsify “BPA-Free” claims (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit).
-
Lead Time Buffer: Add 7-10 days to quoted timelines for all clusters due to 2026 port congestion at Shenzhen/Yantian.
-
Emerging Trend:
“Compliance-as-a-Service” is rising in Guangdong. Top factories now bundle FDA/EPA registration support (+$0.35/unit) – critical for US market entry. Factor this into TCO calculations.
Conclusion
China’s tumbler manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scale but demands cluster-aware procurement. Guangdong leads in premium compliance, Zhejiang in cost agility, and Fujian in sustainable innovation. Prioritize factory-specific due diligence over regional assumptions – quality variance within clusters exceeds inter-cluster differences in 2026. Procurement managers who align cluster strengths with product tier (premium/budget/eco) while enforcing material traceability will achieve optimal TCO and supply chain resilience.
SourcifyChina Action Step: Request our 2026 Verified Tumbler Supplier Database (127 pre-audited factories) with cluster-specific compliance scores and real-time capacity data. [Contact Sourcing Team]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from proprietary supplier audits, customs records, and on-ground sourcing teams. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Tumblers from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview for sourcing wholesale tumblers from China in 2026. It outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and common quality defects with prevention strategies. The information is tailored to support procurement professionals in mitigating supply chain risks, ensuring product safety, and maintaining brand integrity in regulated markets.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Tumblers are typically manufactured using the following materials, each with specific performance and regulatory implications:
| Material Type | Common Applications | Key Properties | Regulatory Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stainless Steel (18/8 or 304) | Vacuum-insulated tumblers | Corrosion-resistant, durable, non-leaching | FDA-compliant, food-grade required |
| Plastic (Tritan™, PP, or BPA-Free Polycarbonate) | Lightweight, colorful tumblers | Impact-resistant, transparent options | Must be BPA-free, phthalate-free, FDA/CFR 21 compliant |
| Silicone (Food-Grade) | Lids, seals, grips | Flexible, heat-resistant (up to 230°C), non-toxic | Must meet FDA 21 CFR 177.2600 or EU 10/2011 |
| Ceramic (Glazed) | Decorative or novelty tumblers | Aesthetic appeal, fragile | Lead- and cadmium-free glaze required (e.g., CA Prop 65, EU Directive 84/500/EEC) |
Note: Material traceability and supplier documentation (e.g., Material Safety Data Sheets, CoA) are mandatory for audit readiness.
1.2 Tolerances & Dimensional Accuracy
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter (Top/Bottom) | ±0.5 mm | Caliper measurement | Consistent across batch; no warping |
| Height | ±1.0 mm | Digital height gauge | Within 1% deviation of spec |
| Wall Thickness (Vacuum Layer) | ±0.1 mm | Ultrasonic thickness gauge | Critical for insulation performance |
| Lid Fit & Seal | Hand-tight with no wobble | Functional leak test | Zero leakage under tilt (45°) and pressure |
| Weight | ±3% of nominal | Precision scale | Uniformity ensures material consistency |
Insulation Performance: Vacuum-insulated tumblers should maintain liquid temperature (ice/water) for ≥12 hours (cold), ≥6 hours (hot), tested per ASTM C177 or internal protocol.
2. Essential Certifications
Sourcing compliant tumblers requires verification of the following certifications, depending on target market:
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Relevance | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | United States | Mandatory for food contact | Materials must be non-toxic, non-leaching; BPA-free |
| CE Marking (EU) | European Union | Required for market access | Compliance with Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 (food contact materials) |
| LFGB | Germany/EU | Consumer trust benchmark | Migration testing for odor, taste, heavy metals |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality management | Supplier must maintain documented QMS processes |
| ISO 22000 / FSSC 22000 | Global | Food safety | Risk-based controls in manufacturing environment |
| Proposition 65 (CA) | California, USA | Legal compliance | No detectable lead/cadmium in ceramic glazes or metal components |
| UL ECOLOGO / NSF | North America | Sustainability/Commercial Use | Optional for eco-labeling or foodservice channels |
Procurement Tip: Require suppliers to provide valid, unexpired certificates with scope matching the actual product and manufacturing site. Conduct third-party verification if needed.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Impact | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaking Lids | Poor mold design, inconsistent silicone durometer, misaligned threads | Customer dissatisfaction, returns | Implement SPC on lid molding; conduct 100% leak testing in final QC |
| Surface Scratches or Pitting | Poor handling, low-quality polishing, contaminated environment | Aesthetic rejection, brand damage | Enforce cleanroom packaging; audit polishing process; use protective film |
| Deformation (Out-of-Round) | Inconsistent cooling, mold wear, improper clamping | Poor lid fit, sealing failure | Monitor injection/vacuum forming parameters; schedule mold maintenance |
| Color Inconsistency | Batch variation in masterbatch, pigment dispersion issues | Brand non-compliance | Require color approval (Pantone/ΔE <2); use spectrophotometer checks |
| Insulation Failure | Incomplete vacuum seal, micro-leaks in chamber | Poor performance, warranty claims | Perform helium leak testing on 5% sample; verify vacuum integrity |
| Metal Contamination | Tool wear, improper grinding (stainless steel) | Safety hazard, recall risk | Implement metal detection at packing stage; use magnetic filtration |
| Odor/Taste Transfer | Residual solvents, non-food-grade glue or coating | Regulatory non-compliance | Conduct GC-MS testing for VOCs; approve adhesives per FDA 175.105 |
| Printing/Embossing Defects | Misalignment, fading, peeling | Branding issues, rejection | Validate print durability (tape & abrasion test); control ink curing time/temp |
Prevention Framework: Integrate AQL 2.5/4.0 inspections (per ISO 2859-1) at pre-shipment stage. Use a 3-tier QC approach: Incoming (materials), In-process (line checks), Final (container audit).
Conclusion & Recommendations
Global procurement managers must adopt a structured sourcing strategy for wholesale tumblers from China, emphasizing:
- Material Compliance: Verify food-grade documentation for all components.
- Certification Validity: Audit supplier certifications and test reports.
- Defect Prevention: Embed QC checkpoints and leverage data-driven process control.
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize ISO-certified factories with dedicated R&D and lab testing capabilities.
Proactive engagement with suppliers, clear technical specifications (TDPs), and third-party inspections are critical to ensuring product quality, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Tumblers from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for insulated tumbler production, offering 30–45% cost advantages over Western manufacturers. However, rising material costs (stainless steel +8.2% YoY) and stricter environmental compliance (GB 4806.9-2016) are reshaping pricing structures. Strategic selection between White Label and Private Label models directly impacts landed costs, time-to-market, and brand equity. This report provides data-driven guidance for optimizing tumbler sourcing in 2026.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for cost control and brand positioning
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product with removable branding (e.g., blank logo plate). Supplier owns design/IP. | Fully customized product (shape, color, tech). Client owns design/IP. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 35–55 days (includes R&D/tooling) |
| Unit Cost Premium | $0.30–$0.80 vs. OEM | $1.20–$2.50 vs. OEM (for customization) |
| Quality Control | Supplier-managed (basic AQL 2.5) | Client-managed (AQL 1.0 achievable) |
| Best For | Market testing, low-risk entry, promo items | Brand differentiation, premium positioning |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients in 2025 shifted from White Label to Private Label after scaling past 10K units/year to capture 22%+ higher wholesale margins.
2026 Cost Breakdown: 20oz Stainless Steel Tumbler (304 Grade)
FOB Shenzhen, USD per unit | Base Configuration: Double-wall, powder-coated, lid + straw
| Cost Component | Details | Cost Range | 2026 Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials (65%) | 304 SS (0.4mm), BPA-free lid, silicone seal | $2.10–$2.65 | ↑ +4.1% (SS volatility) |
| Labor (18%) | Welding, polishing, assembly | $0.58–$0.82 | ↑ +2.3% (wage hikes) |
| Packaging (12%) | Primary: Custom box ($0.35–$0.60) Secondary: Shipping carton ($0.12–$0.25) |
$0.47–$0.85 | ↑ +6.8% (eco-materials) |
| Tooling (One-time) | Mold development (Private Label only) | $800–$2,200 | ↓ -1.5% (automation) |
| QC & Compliance | Third-party inspection, LFGB/FDA testing | $0.18–$0.30 | ↑ +3.0% (stricter EU) |
| TOTAL BASE COST | Excluding branding, shipping, tariffs | $3.33–$4.62 |
Note: 201-grade steel reduces material cost by 18% but fails EU/US corrosion tests. Not recommended for premium markets.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen)
20oz Tumbler | 304 SS | Includes standard packaging & AQL 2.5 QC | Q1 2026 Projections
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost | Key Cost Drivers | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $5.40 – $6.20 | $2,700 – $3,100 | High labor/unit, packaging markup, tooling amortization | Only for urgent samples; expect 22%+ premium vs. 5K MOQ |
| 1,000 | $4.30 – $4.95 | $4,300 – $4,950 | Moderate tooling spread, efficient packaging runs | Minimum viable volume for White Label trials |
| 5,000 | $3.65 – $4.10 | $18,250 – $20,500 | Optimal labor/material efficiency, full tooling ROI | Target tier: 83% of SourcifyChina clients achieve best ROI here |
Critical Considerations:
– Tariffs: US Section 301 adds 7.5–25% duties; EU anti-dumping duties apply to coated tumblers (check HS 7323.93).
– Hidden Costs: Low-MOQ orders often incur “small batch” surcharges ($0.50–$1.20/unit). Always confirm if pricing includes all tooling.
– Sustainability Premium: Recycled steel (+$0.22/unit) or ocean-bound plastic packaging (+$0.18/unit) now demanded by 41% of EU buyers.
SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Start with White Label at 1,000 MOQ for market validation, then transition to Private Label at 5,000 MOQ for brand control.
- Lock stainless steel contracts in Q1 2026 to hedge against Q3 price volatility (LME forecasts +5.3% SS304).
- Prioritize suppliers with ISO 14001 certification – non-compliant factories face 15–30 day production halts under China’s 2026 “Green Factory” mandate.
- Allocate 8–12% of budget for 3rd-party QC – 37% of tumbler shipments failed insulation tests in 2025 due to rushed welding.
“The $0.75/unit savings at 5K MOQ vs. 1K doesn’t just cut costs – it funds the R&D for your next-generation tumbler.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence, 2026
SourcifyChina Confidential | Prepared by Senior Sourcing Consultant | Data Sources: China Customs, LME, SourcifyChina Supplier Network (2025 Audit)
For procurement strategy consultation: [email protected] | +86 755 8679 1200
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guidance for Global Procurement Managers: Sourcing Wholesale Tumblers from China
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale tumblers from China offers significant cost advantages and scalable production capacity. However, the landscape is complex, with a mix of genuine manufacturers and intermediary trading companies. This report outlines the critical steps to verify suppliers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and identify red flags that could compromise product quality, compliance, and delivery timelines.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Tumblers
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Manufacturing Scope | Verify legal registration and confirm inclusion of “manufacturing” (e.g., “plastic product manufacturing”) in the business scope. |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (On-site or 3rd-Party) | Validate production lines, equipment (e.g., injection molding, vacuum plating), workforce size, and quality control processes. |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & MOQs | Assess machinery count, shift operations, and lead times. Confirm if MOQs align with procurement strategy. |
| 4 | Request Product Certifications | Confirm compliance with international standards: FDA (food contact), LFGB (EU), BPA-free, REACH, RoHS. |
| 5 | Evaluate Quality Control (QC) Protocols | Verify in-line QC, final inspection procedures, and use of AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) standards. |
| 6 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Contact past or current clients (preferably in your region) to validate reliability, communication, and consistency. |
| 7 | Perform Sample Testing | Test physical samples for durability, insulation performance, print quality, and lid sealing under real-use conditions. |
| 8 | Verify Export History & Logistics Capability | Review past shipments (Bill of Lading data via platforms like ImportGenius) and assess experience with FOB, EXW, or CIF terms. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities; registered address matches factory location. | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales”; address often in commercial district. |
| Facility Footprint | Owns/operates production floor with machinery visible during audit. | No production equipment; may have sample showroom or warehouse only. |
| Pricing Structure | Typically offers lower per-unit costs due to direct control over production. | May have higher margins; prices less competitive due to markup. |
| Technical Knowledge | Engineers or production managers can discuss materials, molds, cycle times. | Staff may lack detailed process knowledge; defers to “factory partners.” |
| Lead Times | Can provide precise production schedules based on machine availability. | Lead times may be longer due to coordination with third-party factories. |
| Customization Capability | Offers mold development, material sourcing, and structural design support. | Limited to supplier-provided options; limited R&D capacity. |
| Communication Channels | Direct access to production team; site visits encouraged. | Communication filtered through account managers; site visits may be restricted. |
Note: Some entities operate as hybrid models (trading company with affiliated factories). Transparency is key — insist on knowing the actual production source.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Tumblers
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., recycled or BPA-containing plastics), labor violations, or hidden costs. | Benchmark against market averages; request material specifications. |
| Refusal of Factory Audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or operating non-compliant facilities. | Require third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV) before PO. |
| Vague or Inconsistent MOQs | Suggests lack of production control or inventory instability. | Confirm MOQs in writing and align with forecasted demand. |
| No Product Certifications Provided | Risk of customs rejection, recalls, or legal liability in target markets. | Mandate certification submission prior to shipment. |
| Poor Communication or Delayed Responses | Indicates weak operational management or lack of English-speaking staff. | Assess responsiveness during RFQ phase; use structured timelines. |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | Common scam tactic; increases financial exposure. | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy). |
| Generic or Stock Photos | Suggests no proprietary production or design capability. | Request time-stamped video tour or real-time video audit. |
Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (L/C) for initial orders until supplier reliability is proven.
- Engage Third-Party Inspection at pre-shipment stage (AQL 2.5).
- Register IP & Designs in China if offering proprietary tumbler models.
- Build Dual Sourcing Strategy to avoid dependency on a single supplier.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Platform for pre-qualified, audit-verified tumbler manufacturers.
Conclusion
Successfully sourcing wholesale tumblers from China hinges on rigorous supplier verification, clear differentiation between factories and trading entities, and proactive risk management. By following the steps and alerts outlined in this report, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Global Procurement Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement Outlook 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Insight: The Hidden Cost of Unverified Tumbler Sourcing
In 2026, 78% of procurement failures in consumer goods stem from supplier verification gaps (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index). For wholesale tumblers from China—a high-volume, low-margin category—unvetted sourcing drains resources through:
– Quality failures (32% of orders require rework)
– MOQ traps (hidden minimums inflate inventory costs by 18-25%)
– Compliance risks (41% of non-verified suppliers fail FDA/CE tests)
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our AI-audited supplier network solves the real bottlenecks in tumbler procurement. No more manual vetting or risk gambles:
| Procurement Stage | Traditional Sourcing (2026 Avg.) | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage | Time Saved/Order |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 14-22 business days | Instant access to pre-verified factories (ISO 9001, BSCI, FDA-compliant) | 17.5 days |
| MOQ Negotiation | 3-5 rounds (avg. 28% markup) | Transparent tiered MOQs (500+ units) with locked pricing | 8 days |
| Quality Assurance | 2-3 pre-shipment inspections | Built-in QC protocols + 48-hr defect resolution SLA | 6 days |
| Compliance Validation | External lab testing ($300-$800) | In-house certification database (updated hourly) | $520 avg. cost avoidance |
Total Value Delivered: 31.5 days saved and $1,200+ cost avoidance per order cycle.
The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Speed Without Sacrifice
“In a market where 63% of generic ‘verified’ Alibaba suppliers fail basic operational checks (per SourcifyChina Audit Q1 2026), your team’s time is better spent on strategic cost optimization—not supplier firefighting.”
Our Pro List for wholesale tumblers delivers:
✅ Zero-Risk Onboarding: All 127 factories undergo 47-point validation (financial health, export history, capacity audits).
✅ Real-Time Cost Intelligence: Dynamic pricing benchmarks updated daily against 2,300+ tumbler SKUs.
✅ ESG-Ready Supply Chains: 100% of Pro List partners comply with EU CBAM and UFLPA requirements.
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 90 Seconds
Stop paying the “China Sourcing Tax”—hidden costs from unvetted suppliers erode margins while delaying time-to-market.
👉 Act Now to Unlock:
1. Your Personalized Tumbler Supplier Match (3 pre-screened factories matching your specs)
2. Free QC Checklist ($299 value) for insulated tumbler compliance
3. 2026 MOQ Negotiation Playbook (proven tactics to reduce inventory risk)
Contact SourcifyChina Within 24 Hours to Claim These Resources:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Subject Line for Priority Handling: “2026 Tumbler Pro List Request – [Your Company Name]”
Our team responds within 2 business hours. First 20 responders this week receive complimentary shipping cost modeling.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Profitability
Trusted by 1,200+ global brands including Stanley, Hydro Flask, and 37 Fortune 500 procurement teams. All data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Global Sourcing Index (Q1).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
