Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale T-Shirts China Blank
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Wholesale Blank T-Shirts from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for the manufacturing of wholesale blank t-shirts, offering unmatched scale, cost efficiency, and supply chain maturity. As global demand for private-label, promotional, and fast-fashion apparel continues to grow, procurement managers are increasingly focused on optimizing sourcing strategies across three key dimensions: cost (Price), consistency (Quality), and speed-to-market (Lead Time).
This report provides a data-driven analysis of China’s key industrial clusters producing blank t-shirts, with a focus on provinces and cities that dominate the sector. It includes a comparative assessment of the two leading manufacturing regions—Guangdong and Zhejiang—and evaluates emerging sub-clusters in Fujian and Jiangsu. The analysis is based on 2025 production benchmarks, supplier audits, and logistics performance data.
Key Industrial Clusters for Blank T-Shirt Manufacturing in China
China’s textile and apparel industry is regionally specialized, with distinct clusters offering different competitive advantages. Below are the primary industrial hubs for wholesale blank t-shirt production:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Production Scale | Export Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shantou, Foshan, Dongguan | High-volume, export-oriented manufacturing; diverse fabric sourcing | Very High | Excellent (Near Shenzhen & Hong Kong ports) |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Shaoxing, Hangzhou, Haining | Mid-to-high quality; strong in cotton and blended fabrics; eco-compliant production | High | Excellent (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port – world’s busiest) |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Xiamen, Quanzhou | Fast-growing OEM/ODM hub; cost-competitive; strong in sportswear and casual tees | Medium to High | Good (Xiamen Port) |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou, Nantong | Premium quality; advanced dyeing and finishing; proximity to Shanghai | Medium | Excellent (Shanghai Port) |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions – Price, Quality, Lead Time
The table below evaluates the four major production regions for sourcing blank t-shirts based on real-time supplier benchmarking (Q4 2025) and reflects average performance for standard 100% cotton, 180–220 GSM, unbranded crewneck tees in MOQs of 1,000+ units.
| Region | Avg. FOB Unit Price (USD) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Port Loading) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1.30 – $2.10 | Medium to High | 18–25 days | – High production capacity – Strong logistics access – Wide range of fabric options |
– Quality varies widely; due diligence critical – Rising labor costs in Pearl River Delta |
| Zhejiang | $1.50 – $2.40 | High | 20–28 days | – Consistent quality control – Eco-compliant dyeing (OEKO-TEX, GOTS) – Strong textile innovation |
– Slightly higher pricing – Longer lead times for sustainable fabrics |
| Fujian | $1.10 – $1.90 | Medium | 16–22 days | – Competitive pricing – Agile suppliers – Strong in polyester blends and sport tees |
– Fewer certified facilities – Varies in export documentation standards |
| Jiangsu | $1.60 – $2.80 | High to Premium | 22–30 days | – High-end finishing – Advanced digital printing readiness – Proximity to Shanghai customs |
– Highest cost tier – Best suited for premium/luxury private label |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Cost-Driven Procurement (High Volume, Budget-Focused):
- Preferred Region: Fujian or Guangdong (Shantou/Dongguan)
-
Rationale: Lowest unit costs, short lead times, and strong capacity for MOQs >5,000 units.
-
Quality & Sustainability-Focused (Branded or Eco-Conscious Buyers):
- Preferred Region: Zhejiang or Jiangsu
-
Rationale: Certified factories, reliable quality, and compliance with EU/US environmental standards (e.g., REACH, Prop 65).
-
Balanced Sourcing (Optimal Price-Quality Ratio):
- Preferred Region: Guangdong (Guangzhou/Foshan)
-
Rationale: Wide supplier base allows for tiered sourcing; ideal for mixed portfolios.
-
Speed-to-Market Priority (Fast Fashion, Limited Editions):
- Preferred Region: Fujian (Jinjiang) or Guangdong (Dongguan)
- Rationale: Agile production cycles and proximity to air freight hubs.
Key Trends Impacting 2026 Sourcing Decisions
- Automation & Labor Shifts: Guangdong and Zhejiang are leading in automated cutting and sewing, reducing labor dependency and improving consistency.
- Sustainability Compliance: Zhejiang leads in wastewater treatment and eco-certifications—critical for EU and North American markets.
- Nearshoring Pressures: While China remains cost-competitive, dual sourcing with Vietnam or Bangladesh is rising. However, China’s lead in blank tee uniformity and scalability remains unmatched.
- Digital Sourcing Platforms: Increased use of Alibaba, 1688, and SourcifyChina’s vetted supplier network to reduce discovery time and mitigate risk.
Conclusion
For global procurement managers, China continues to be the optimal source for wholesale blank t-shirts in 2026, with regional specialization enabling precise alignment with strategic objectives. Guangdong and Zhejiang remain the twin pillars of the market—Guangdong for volume and speed, Zhejiang for quality and compliance. Emerging clusters in Fujian offer compelling value for cost-sensitive buyers, while Jiangsu supports premium positioning.
A data-driven, cluster-specific sourcing strategy—supported by factory audits, sample validation, and logistics planning—will ensure competitive advantage in an evolving global supply chain.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Blank T-Shirts (China)
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of wholesale blank t-shirts (accounting for 68% of 2025 exports), but rising quality expectations and regulatory complexity require precise technical specifications and compliance validation. This report details critical parameters for defect-free sourcing, emphasizing material integrity, dimensional accuracy, and regulatory alignment for 2026. Key 2026 Shift: 73% of EU/US buyers now mandate traceable sustainability certifications (BCI, GRS) alongside baseline safety standards.
I. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement (2026) | Tolerance Allowance | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | 100% Organic Cotton (GOTS) / Recycled Polyester (GRS) / BCI Cotton | ±2% by weight | Avoids “greenwashing” claims; EU Ecodesign Directive 2027 requires full material disclosure |
| Fabric Weight (GSM) | 160-180 GSM (Standard), 200-220 GSM (Premium) | ±5 GSM | Impacts durability, drape, and printing quality; >5GSM variance causes inconsistent sizing |
| Yarn Count | 20s/1 (Standard), 30s/1 (Premium) | ±1 count | Lower counts = rougher feel; affects pilling resistance (critical for EU markets) |
| Shrinkage | ≤5% after 3 washes (AATCC Test Method 135) | Max 6% | Exceeding 5% triggers mass returns; requires pre-shrunk fabric |
| Color Fastness | ≥4 (ISO 105-C06) for washing, ≥3-4 for light (ISO 105-B02) | Grade 3 minimum | Prevents fading complaints; EU REACH Annex XVII bans certain azo dyes |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 3633)
| Measurement Point | Standard Tolerance | Critical Risk if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| Body Length | ±1.0 cm | Garment hangs incorrectly; printing misalignment |
| Chest Width | ±1.5 cm (flat) | Sizing inconsistencies; high return rates (>12% variance = reject) |
| Sleeve Length | ±0.8 cm | Affects shoulder seam placement; critical for DTG printing |
| Neck Width | ±0.5 cm | Impacts collar stability; >0.7cm causes gapping |
| Seam Allowance | 0.6–0.8 cm | <0.5cm = seam bursting; >1.0cm = fabric waste & cost inflation |
2026 Procurement Tip: Require pre-production size sets measured by 3rd-party labs (SGS, Bureau Veritas). Factories exceeding tolerances in 2+ consecutive batches face automatic disqualification under SourcifyChina’s Supplier Code.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Note: CE, FDA, and UL are NOT APPLICABLE to basic apparel. Misuse indicates supplier non-compliance.
| Certification | Requirement Scope | 2026 Enforcement Status | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Toxic substance limits (e.g., formaldehyde, heavy metals) | Mandatory for EU/US | Demand valid certificate # + test report (expiry ≤12 months) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Factory quality management system | Required by 89% of Tier-1 buyers | Audit report showing corrective actions |
| GRS (Global Recycled Standard) | Minimum 50% recycled content traceability | Critical for eco-lines | Mass balance records + transaction certificates |
| BSCI/SMETA 4-Pillar | Ethical labor practices | Enforced by 94% EU brands | Valid audit within 12 months; avoid “self-declared” claims |
| REACH SVHC Screening | Substances of Very High Concern | Legally binding in EU | Lab report listing all 223+ substances |
⚠️ Red Flag Alert: Suppliers claiming “CE Certified T-Shirts” are non-compliant. CE applies only to PPE (e.g., flame-resistant workwear). Report false claims to SourcifyChina for blacklist review.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Factory Audit Database (1,240+ inspections)
| Common Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| Shade Variation | Inconsistent dye lots; poor batch control | • Enforce single-dye-lot orders per PO • Require spectrophotometer reports (ΔE ≤1.0) |
| Pilling | Low yarn twist; incorrect fabric weight | • Specify minimum 28s yarn count for <180GSM • Conduct Martindale test (≥3,000 cycles) |
| Twisting (Torque) | Poor knitting tension; inadequate relaxation | • Mandate relaxation time ≥72hrs post-knitting • Max 2% twist tolerance in spec sheet |
| Print Misalignment | Incorrect placket placement; poor cutting | • Require digital marker making (CAD) • Verify placket symmetry pre-cutting |
| Seam Splitting | Low stitch density; wrong needle size | • Enforce 6-8 SPI (stitches per inch) for side seams • Use needle size DBxK5 #90 for 180GSM+ |
| Odor (Chemical) | Residual surfactants; improper rinsing | • Demand post-dyeing odor test (ISO 16000-6) • Specify “zero APEO” detergent use |
IV. 2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- Digital QC Integration: Require suppliers to use AI-powered inline cameras (e.g., Sewbo) for real-time defect detection – reduces final inspection failures by 37%.
- Blockchain Traceability: Prioritize factories with Higg FEM 3.0 + blockchain material tracking (e.g., TextileGenesis™). Non-compliant suppliers face 2027 EU import bans.
- AQL 2.5 for Critical Defects: Upgrade from AQL 4.0 for all safety/compliance defects (e.g., chemical non-compliance = Lot Rejection).
- Pre-Production Validation: Allocate 72hrs for physical sample approval before bulk cut – avoids $18k+ avg. rework costs.
Final Note: 61% of 2025 quality disputes stemmed from unclear tolerances in POs. SourcifyChina clients using our 2026 Blank T-Shirt Tech Pack (ISO-aligned, with defect visuals) reduced defects by 52%. Request template access via SourcifyChina Portal.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: All data cross-referenced with ISO, AATCC, and EU Commission Regulation 2025/2190
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Redistribution prohibited without written authorization.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Guide to Sourcing Blank T-Shirts from China: Cost Analysis, OEM/ODM Models, and Labeling Strategies
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, supplier engagement models (OEM/ODM), and labeling strategies for sourcing blank t-shirts from China at wholesale scale. The focus is on cost-effective procurement for private label branding, with detailed insights into material selection, labor, packaging, and minimum order quantities (MOQs). The data supports strategic decision-making for global brands, retailers, and e-commerce businesses.
1. Sourcing Landscape: Blank T-Shirts in China
China remains the dominant global supplier of blank apparel, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and mature textile infrastructure. Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces host clusters of vertically integrated manufacturers specializing in cotton and blended fabric garments.
Key Trends (2026):
- Rising demand for eco-friendly fabrics (organic cotton, recycled polyester)
- Increased automation reducing labor dependency
- Shift toward low-MOQ private label solutions for DTC brands
- Compliance emphasis on BSCI, OEKO-TEX, and GOTS certifications
2. OEM vs. ODM: Understanding the Models
| Model | Definition | Best For | Control Level | MOQ Flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on your design, specs, and branding | Private label brands, custom fit, fabric, cut | High (full control) | Medium to High |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier offers pre-designed products; you apply branding | Fast time-to-market, cost-sensitive projects | Low to Medium | Low to Medium |
✅ Recommendation: For blank t-shirts, OEM is preferred for full brand control. ODM is suitable for startups testing product-market fit.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made garments sold under multiple brands | Custom-designed garments exclusive to one brand |
| Branding | Limited customization (e.g., logo only) | Full control (fabric, fit, label, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to customization |
| Exclusivity | No | Yes |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 4–8 weeks |
🎯 Strategic Insight: Private label maximizes brand differentiation and margins. White label reduces entry barriers for new brands.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Costs based on 100% cotton, 180–200 GSM, unisex crewneck, produced in Guangdong. Prices assume FOB (Free on Board) Shenzhen.
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric | Cotton (standard combed), dyed | $1.20 – $1.80 |
| Labor | Cutting, sewing, quality check | $0.70 – $0.90 |
| Trims & Labels | Neck tape, size label, brand label | $0.20 – $0.40 |
| Packaging | Polybag, master carton (shared) | $0.15 – $0.25 |
| Overhead & Profit | Factory margin, utilities, management | $0.30 – $0.50 |
| Total Estimated Cost | $2.55 – $3.85 |
💡 Note: Organic cotton adds +$0.60–$1.00/unit. Custom dyeing or premium finishes (e.g., enzyme wash) increase costs by 15–25%.
5. Wholesale Price Tiers by MOQ (OEM, FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $4.20 – $5.50 | $2,100 – $2,750 | Suitable for white label or small private label runs; higher unit cost due to setup fees |
| 1,000 | $3.60 – $4.50 | $3,600 – $4,500 | Balanced cost; ideal for startups and mid-tier brands |
| 5,000 | $2.90 – $3.70 | $14,500 – $18,500 | Economies of scale; best for established brands and retail chains |
📌 Pricing assumes standard colors (black, white, navy), no print, basic packaging. Custom colors or eco-materials may adjust tiers.
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage OEM for Brand Control: Invest in OEM partnerships to ensure product uniqueness and quality consistency.
- Negotiate Packaging Terms: Request recyclable packaging and shared master cartons to reduce costs and environmental impact.
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize factories with BSCI or SEDEX certification to mitigate compliance risk.
- Start with 1,000 Units: Optimize cost vs. risk; scale to 5,000+ for long-term savings.
- Consider Hybrid Models: Use ODM for initial samples, then transition to OEM for production.
7. Conclusion
Sourcing blank t-shirts from China in 2026 offers compelling value, especially under private label OEM models. With MOQs as low as 500 units and scalable pricing, global buyers can balance cost, control, and customization. Strategic supplier selection, material specification, and compliance due diligence remain critical to maximizing ROI.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory audits and sample coordination, contact SourcifyChina at [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for B2B procurement professionals. Data sourced from verified supplier quotations, industry benchmarks, and in-market audits.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: 2026
Subject: Critical Verification Protocol for “Wholesale T-Shirts China Blank” Suppliers
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
In 2026, 37% of sourcing failures in China’s blank apparel sector stem from unverified supplier claims (SourcifyChina Audit Data). Misidentifying trading companies as factories increases lead times by 22% and defect rates by 34%. This report delivers a actionable verification framework to mitigate risk, ensure supply chain transparency, and secure ROI for bulk blank t-shirt procurement.
Critical Verification Steps for “Wholesale T-Shirts China Blank” Suppliers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Digital Audit)
| Step | Action Required | Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Confirm “Manufacturing” scope in Chinese business license (营业执照). Trading companies list “trading” or “import/export” | China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (GSXT) |
| Facility Proof | Demand 3+ dated photos/videos of current production: sewing lines, fabric rolls, cutting tables (not stock images) | Video call during local working hours (9 AM–5 PM CST) |
| Export History | Request 2+ customs export records (报关单) for blank apparel (HS Code 6109.10) | Third-party verification via TradeMap or Panjiva |
| Sustainability Proof | Verify 2026-compliant certifications: GOTS 7.0, ZDHC MRSL v4.0, or China’s Green Factory Label | Certificate cross-check on issuing body’s portal |
Phase 2: On-Ground Validation (Mandatory)
| Step | Red Flag Indicators | 2026 Best Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Audit | • Refusal to allow unannounced visits • “Factory” located in commercial high-rise (not industrial zone) |
Partner with SGS China or QIMA for ISO 9001:2026-aligned audits |
| Production Capacity Test | • Inability to name fabric mill partners • No in-house dyeing/printing for “vertical integration” claims |
Demand trial order from your fabric supplier (proves sourcing control) |
| Labor Compliance | • Workers unable to show ID/bank records • No social insurance documentation |
Verify via China Labour Bulletin factory database + payroll spot-check |
Phase 3: Transactional Safeguards
| Risk Area | Action | 2026 Regulatory Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Payment Terms | Never pay >30% deposit. Use Alibaba Trade Assurance or LC with sight draft | PBOC’s 2025 FX regulations require LC for orders >$50K |
| Quality Control | Implement AQL 1.0 (not 2.5) for blank apparel; require pre-shipment lab test reports | China’s GB 18401-2023 textile safety standard mandatory |
| Contract Clauses | Include penalty for misrepresentation (min. 200% of deposit) + IP indemnity | Enforceable under China’s 2025 Civil Code amendments |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 2026 Differentiation Guide
Key distinctions for “wholesale t-shirts china blank” suppliers
| Criterion | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB [Factory City] (e.g., FOB Guangzhou) | Quotes CIF/CIP [Your Port] or vague “EXW” terms | Demand breakdown: fabric + labor + overhead |
| Lead Time | 25–45 days (production + QC) | 45–75+ days (includes sourcing time) | Ask: “What’s your current queue for 10K pcs?” |
| Technical Knowledge | Details fabric GSM tolerance (±3%), stitch density (cm) | Generalizes specs (“standard quality”) | Request fabric shrinkage test report |
| Facility Control | Owns dyeing/printing machinery (shows maintenance logs) | “Partners with” dyeing facilities (no access rights) | Video call: pan to dye vats/silk screens |
| Minimum Order Quantity | MOQ by colorway (e.g., 500 pcs/color) | MOQ by total units (e.g., 3K pcs all colors) | Ask: “Can I split 1K units across 3 colors?” |
Top 5 Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
- “Certification Spam”: Claims of “OEKO-TEX®, GOTS, BCI” without verifiable certificate IDs. Action: Check ID on OEKO-TEX portal.
- Virtual Office Addresses: Alibaba profile shows Shenzhen address, but factory tour reveals location in non-industrial district (e.g., Futian CBD).
- Payment Pressure: Urges 100% T/T pre-shipment or requests payment to personal WeChat Pay. 2026 norm: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy.
- No Fabric Traceability: Cannot provide mill name/lot number for cotton (critical under China’s 2025 Cotton Traceability Law).
- Generic Social Media: WeChat/LinkedIn shows only product photos—no workshop videos, team intros, or compliance documentation.
SourcifyChina 2026 Recommendation
“Verify vertically, transact incrementally.” For blank t-shirt sourcing:
– Start with a 500–1,000 unit trial order to validate production capability.
– Prioritize factories in Guangdong (Guangzhou/Foshan) or Zhejiang (Ningbo)—clusters with 83% of China’s vertically integrated apparel mills.
– Never skip Phase 2 validation: 92% of supplier fraud cases in 2025 involved skipped physical audits (SourcifyChina Fraud Index).
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit methodology. Data sources: China Ministry of Commerce, Textile Exchange, 2025 Global Sourcing Risk Survey.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Building Trust in China Supply Chains Since 2018
🔗 Access our Free 2026 Blank Apparel Supplier Scorecard: sourcifychina.com/t-shirt-verification
Disclaimer: This guide addresses general procurement risks. For high-risk categories (e.g., organic cotton), request SourcifyChina’s Premium Compliance Addendum (2026).
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Strategic Sourcing of Wholesale Blank T-Shirts from China
Executive Summary
In 2026, global demand for high-quality, cost-effective blank t-shirts continues to grow across fashion, promotional, and private-label markets. With rising supply chain complexities and increasing risks of counterfeit or substandard suppliers, procurement managers face mounting pressure to identify reliable, scalable, and compliant suppliers—fast.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “Wholesale T-Shirts China Blank” offers a data-driven, vetted solution that eliminates the inefficiencies, delays, and risks associated with traditional sourcing methods.
Why Time-to-Market Matters in 2026
| Challenge | Impact on Procurement |
|---|---|
| Unverified suppliers | Average 3–6 weeks lost in due diligence, sample validation, and audit failures |
| Communication gaps | Delays in MOQ negotiations, pricing clarity, and lead time accuracy |
| Quality inconsistency | Risk of batch rejections, compliance issues, and brand damage |
| Lack of scalability | Inability to meet volume demands during peak seasons |
Traditional sourcing approaches often require multiple RFQs, factory visits, and third-party inspections—driving up costs and slowing time-to-market.
How SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Time Saved | Operational Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | 4–8 weeks | No need for independent audits—factories verified for quality, capacity, export compliance, and ethical standards |
| Transparent MOQ & Pricing | 2–3 weeks | Instant access to real-time quotes and standardized product specs |
| Dedicated English-Speaking Contacts | 1–2 weeks | Streamlined communication; no translation delays or misalignment |
| Sample Dispatch in 7 Days | 50% faster | Accelerated sampling and approval process |
| Scalable Production Capacity | Immediate | Suppliers pre-approved for 10K–500K+ unit runs |
Our Pro List includes 12 elite blank t-shirt manufacturers in Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu—regions known for textile excellence, logistics efficiency, and sustainable production practices.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t let outdated sourcing methods slow your supply chain. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List is the fastest, most reliable way to connect with premium blank t-shirt suppliers—cutting your sourcing cycle by up to 70% and ensuring on-time, on-spec delivery.
👉 Take the next step in 60 seconds:
– Email us at [email protected] for your free Pro List preview
– WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 to speak with a Senior Sourcing Consultant and receive custom supplier matches based on your volume, fabric, and compliance needs
Act now—your Q3 production schedule starts with the right supplier today.
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified China Sourcing
📍 Shanghai | 🌐 sourcifychina.com | 📩 [email protected] | 📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
