Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Pro Club T Shirts China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Pro Club T-Shirts from China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for premium blank pro club t-shirts (defined as heavyweight, ring-spun combed cotton, reinforced stitching, and professional-grade color consistency), supplying 68% of the international B2B market in 2025. Rising labor costs and environmental regulations are reshaping regional competitiveness, with Guangdong and Zhejiang emerging as the top clusters for quality-critical procurement. Procurement managers must prioritize cluster-specific sourcing strategies to mitigate hidden costs (e.g., dye-lot variations, MOQ penalties) while securing compliance (BSCI, ISO 9001). Critical insight: 42% of “pro club” Alibaba listings misrepresent fabric composition—third-party lab testing is non-negotiable.
Key Industrial Clusters for Pro Club T-Shirt Manufacturing
Pro club t-shirts require specialized knit mills, dyeing facilities, and quality control systems. China’s manufacturing is concentrated in four clusters, each with distinct advantages:
- Guangdong Province (Dongguan/Foshan/Shenzhen)
- Core Strength: Premium fabric production (ring-spun combed cotton ≥30s count), automated cutting, and consistent color matching (critical for team uniforms).
- Key Factories: Dongguan V-Textile (ISO 14001 certified), Foshan Elite Apparel (supplying MLS/NHL affiliates).
-
Market Share: 35% of high-end pro club volume. Ideal for orders requiring <2% shade variation.
-
Zhejiang Province (Shaoxing/Ningbo)
- Core Strength: Integrated fabric-to-finish supply chain (Shaoxing = “Textile Capital of Asia”), cost efficiency for mid-premium segments.
- Key Factories: Ningbo Youngor Knitwear (vertically integrated), Shaoxing Textile Group (BSCI audited).
-
Market Share: 40% of mid-tier pro club volume. Dominates hospitality/promo markets (e.g., hotel staff uniforms).
-
Fujian Province (Quanzhou/Xiamen)
- Core Strength: Sportswear specialization (moisture-wicking blends), lower labor costs.
- Limitation: Limited heavy-combed cotton capacity; quality control gaps in dyeing.
-
Use Case: Budget-conscious sports clubs (not “pro club” premium segment).
-
Jiangsu Province (Suzhou/Wuxi)
- Core Strength: Technical fabric innovation (e.g., recycled blends), automation.
- Limitation: High MOQs (5,000+ units/style), longer lead times.
- Use Case: Eco-conscious brands requiring GRS certification.
Strategic Note: Avoid “pro club” sourcing from Jiangxi/Henan clusters—these regions specialize in fast fashion, not heavyweight knits. Quality failure rates exceed 22% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
Regional Cluster Comparison: Critical Sourcing Metrics (Q1 2026)
All prices FOB port; based on 1,000-unit order of 180gsm 100% ring-spun combed cotton, solid color, 30s count.
| Region | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Quality Tier | Typical Lead Time | Key Risk Factors | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $4.20 – $5.80 | ★★★★★ (Elite) | 25-35 days | Labor cost inflation (+8% YoY); strict environmental compliance | Premium sports leagues, luxury hospitality |
| Zhejiang | $3.50 – $4.90 | ★★★★☆ (High) | 30-40 days | Fabric shortages (Q1 2026); inconsistent dye lots | Mid-market brands, corporate promo programs |
| Fujian | $2.90 – $4.10 | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | 20-30 days | High defect rates (stitching/color); limited audit compliance | Budget sportswear, non-critical uniforms |
| Jiangsu | $4.60 – $6.30 | ★★★★☆ (High, technical focus) | 40-50 days | Very high MOQs (5k+); complex tech-fabric pricing | Sustainable/technical apparel programs |
Quality Tier Definitions:
– ★★★★★: <1.5% defect rate, certified color consistency (AATCC Grey Scale 4+), reinforced neck tape
– ★★★★☆: 1.5-3% defect rate, minor dye-lot variations, standard stitching
– ★★★☆☆: 3-5% defect rate, inconsistent shrinkage, basic quality control
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Guangdong for Quality-Sensitive Orders:
- Action: Partner with Foshan-based mills for NFL/MLB-tier consistency. Budget 10-15% premium vs. Zhejiang but avoid 30%+ cost of post-production rejections.
-
2026 Trend: Guangdong factories are shifting to “smart dyeing” (AI color calibration), reducing lead times by 7 days by 2027.
-
Leverage Zhejiang for Cost-Optimized Mid-Tier Volume:
- Action: Consolidate orders with Shaoxing fabric suppliers to bypass middlemen. Critical: Enforce AQL 1.5 (not standard 2.5) for pro club specs.
-
Risk Alert: Shaoxing’s water discharge regulations (effective Q3 2026) may cause 10-15 day delays—build buffer into timelines.
-
Mandate Cluster-Specific Compliance:
- Guangdong/Zhejiang: Require on-site dyeing facility audits (70% of color defects originate here).
-
All clusters: Insist on third-party lab reports for fabric composition (common fraud: blending polyester into “100% cotton” claims).
-
Optimize Logistics:
- Guangdong: Use Shenzhen Yantian Port (direct US routes, 14-day transit).
- Zhejiang: Opt for Ningbo Port (lower congestion fees, +2 days transit time).
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang are the only clusters viable for true pro club t-shirt sourcing in 2026, but with divergent value propositions: Guangdong for uncompromised quality (despite higher costs), Zhejiang for scalable mid-premium volume (with tighter quality oversight). Procurement managers must abandon “China-wide” RFQs and instead target cluster-specialized suppliers. SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cluster Verification Program (including unannounced dye-house audits) reduces quality failures by 63%—contact your consultant for access.
Disclaimer: Pricing based on SourcifyChina’s Q1 2026 Sourcing Index (n=1,200 factories). Labor/environmental regulations subject to change. All data proprietary to SourcifyChina.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Next Step: Request our Verified Supplier List: Pro Club T-Shirt Clusters (2026) with audited factory contacts and compliance scores.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Wholesale Pro Club T-Shirts from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical and compliance framework for sourcing wholesale professional club (pro club) T-shirts from manufacturers in China. Designed for bulk procurement in sports, corporate branding, and promotional markets, these garments require strict adherence to material quality, dimensional tolerances, and international regulatory standards. This guide ensures procurement managers can evaluate suppliers effectively, mitigate quality risks, and maintain brand integrity.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Pro club T-shirts are typically constructed using combed ring-spun cotton or cotton-polyester blends to balance comfort, durability, and printability.
| Parameter | Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | 100% Combed Ring-Spun Cotton, or 60% Cotton / 40% Polyester Blend | Preferred for softness and reduced pilling |
| Fabric Weight | 180–220 GSM (Grams per Square Meter) | Standard for mid-weight comfort and structure |
| Thread Count | 30s or 40s single jersey knit | Higher thread count = smoother finish |
| Elasticity | ≤5% shrinkage after 3 washes (AATCC Test Method 135) | Pre-shrunk fabric required |
| Color Fastness | ≥4 on Gray Scale (AATCC 16 or ISO 105-B02) | Resistance to fading under light exposure |
1.2 Tolerances
Manufacturing tolerances must be controlled to ensure consistency across large-volume orders.
| Dimension | Tolerance | Testing Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Chest Width (Laid Flat) | ±1.0 cm | Measured 2 cm below armhole |
| Body Length | ±1.5 cm | From highest shoulder point to hem |
| Sleeve Length | ±1.0 cm | From shoulder seam to cuff |
| Neck Ribbing Height | ±0.3 cm | For crew neck designs |
| Weight per Unit | ±5% of sample average | Random batch sampling |
2. Essential Certifications
To ensure global market compliance, suppliers must provide valid documentation. These certifications validate ethical, environmental, and safety standards.
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | Mandatory for consistent production processes |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Harmful Substance Testing | Ensures absence of toxic dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals |
| BSCI or SMETA | Social Compliance Audit | Verifies ethical labor practices (EU/UK focus) |
| WRAP (Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production) | Ethical Manufacturing | Preferred for North American markets |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental Management | Required for sustainability-conscious brands |
| GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) | Organic Textile Processing | If sourcing organic cotton variants |
| FDA (Indirect) | Textile Dyes & Inks | Relevant if apparel contacts skin long-term; FDA monitors dye safety under CPSIA |
| REACH (EU) | Chemical Compliance (SVHC) | Required for EU market access |
| CA Prop 65 (USA) | Carcinogen & Reprotoxin Disclosure | Applies to printed garments sold in California |
Note: CE marking does not apply to basic apparel. UL certification is not applicable unless integrated electronics (e.g., smart fabrics) are involved.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Shrinkage >5% | Inadequate pre-shrinking or relaxation of fabric | Enforce pre-shrinking process; require AATCC 135 test reports |
| Color Variation (Lot-to-Lot) | Inconsistent dye batches or water pH | Use dyed yarns (solution-dyed) or enforce batch traceability; conduct strike-off approvals |
| Pilling on Surface | Low fiber quality or insufficient singeing | Use combed ring-spun cotton; specify anti-pilling finish; conduct Martindale abrasion test |
| Misaligned Prints/Logos | Poor screen registration or fabric tension | Require digital mockups and physical print approvals; audit print alignment (±2mm tolerance) |
| Seam Splitting | Low stitch density or poor thread quality | Enforce 12–14 SPI (stitches per inch); use bonded polyester thread; conduct seam slippage test (ASTM D434) |
| Neck Ribbing Roll or Deformation | Poor elastane content or knitting tension | Specify 95% Cotton / 5% Spandex rib; conduct 3-cycle wash test |
| Odor (Chemical or Mildew) | Residual processing chemicals or poor storage | Require odor-free certification; inspect warehouse humidity controls (<65% RH) |
| Sizing Inconsistencies | Pattern grading errors or cutting inaccuracies | Require size set approval; conduct in-line measurement audits at 20%, 50%, 80% production |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Conduct pre-shipment inspections (PSI) using AQL 2.5 (General Level II).
- Request Documentation: Full test reports (fabric, trims, final product), compliance certificates, and batch traceability logs.
- Use Third-Party QC: Engage SGS, Bureau Veritas, or TÜV for independent quality and compliance verification.
- Sample Approval Process: Implement 3-stage approval: prototype, pre-production, and bulk production samples.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Your Trusted Partner in Global Apparel Procurement
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Premium Club T-Shirt Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-APP-2026-003
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive, high-volume production of premium blank club t-shirts (e.g., Gildan® Heavy Cotton™ equivalents). This report details 2026 cost structures, strategic labeling options, and actionable sourcing intelligence for procurement managers targeting wholesale pro club t-shirts from China. Key findings indicate a 12–18% YoY cost increase driven by sustainable material premiums and labor adjustments, with MOQ flexibility now critical for margin preservation.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for brand control, cost, and scalability
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s pre-existing design/fabric; your label added | Fully customized design, fabric, fit, packaging; branded as your product |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units; uses existing inventory) | Medium (1,000–5,000 units; requires new production run) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (ready-made blanks) | 35–50 days (custom development + production) |
| Cost Premium | Base cost only (+$0.20–0.50/unit for labeling) | +15–30% vs. white label (R&D, tooling, exclusivity) |
| Brand Control | Limited (fabric/design fixed) | Full (specify GSM, dyes, stitching, hangtags) |
| Best For | Entry-level brands; urgent replenishment | Premium differentiation; long-term brand equity |
Strategic Insight: Private label adoption grew 22% in 2025 (SourcifyChina data). While 18% costlier, it yields 35%+ higher resale margins for DTC brands. White label suits inventory-driven retailers needing rapid turnover.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Premium Club T-Shirt (100% Combed Cotton, 6.1oz, S-XXL)
Per-Unit Costs (FOB China Port; USD)
| Cost Component | Base Cost (2025) | 2026 Projection | YoY Change | Key Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $2.10–$2.45 | $2.40–$2.85 | +14.3% | Organic cotton +8%; recycled polyester lining +12% (EU EPR compliance) |
| Labor | $0.65–$0.80 | $0.72–$0.88 | +9.5% | Minimum wage hikes (Guangdong: +7.2%); skilled sewing shortages |
| Packaging | $0.15–$0.25 | $0.18–$0.30 | +16.7% | Biodegradable polybags (+22%); custom hangtags (+$0.03/unit) |
| QC & Compliance | $0.10–$0.15 | $0.12–$0.18 | +15.0% | Enhanced social audits (SMETA 6.0); chemical testing (REACH Annex XVII) |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $3.00–$3.65 | $3.42–$4.21 | +14.0% |
Note: Costs exclude shipping, tariffs, and duties. U.S. Section 301 tariffs (7.5%) remain active on HTS 6109.10.0015 as of Q1 2026.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB China (USD/Unit)
Standard 100% Combed Cotton, 6.1oz, S-XXL | Includes basic labeling & polybag
| MOQ Tier | Price Range (USD/Unit) | Total Order Cost (Example) | Key Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4.05 – $4.65 | $2,025 – $2,325 | • High setup fees ($150–$250) • No fabric bulk discount • Fixed QC cost allocation |
| 1,000 units | $3.65 – $4.15 | $3,650 – $4,150 | • Reduced setup fee ($80–$150) • 5% fabric discount • Efficient QC per unit |
| 5,000 units | $3.30 – $3.75 | $16,500 – $18,750 | • Full fabric bulk discount (12–15%) • Optimized labor allocation • Volume-based packaging savings |
Critical Notes:
– 500-unit tier: Only viable with suppliers holding pre-approved fabric stock. New fabric development adds 10–14 days + $300–$500 fee.
– 5,000-unit tier: Achieves 19% lower cost/unit vs. 500 units, but requires 30% higher working capital.
– Hidden Costs: Artwork setup ($50), size-set deviation (+$0.15/unit), expedited shipping (+22% FOB).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Optimize MOQ Strategy: For startups, combine 500-unit white label orders with 3PL fulfillment to test markets. Scale to 5,000-unit private label once demand stabilizes.
- Lock Material Costs: Secure 6-month cotton contracts with Tier-1 mills (e.g., Shandong Weiqiao) to mitigate 2026 price volatility.
- Audit Compliance Early: Require suppliers to provide 2026-valid OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 and BCI certificates before PO placement. Non-compliant batches face EU border rejections (2025 avg. delay: 22 days).
- Leverage Hybrid Labeling: Use private label for core SKUs (5k+ MOQ) and white label for seasonal colors (500–1k MOQ) to balance cost/risk.
“Suppliers quoting below $3.20/unit FOB for 5k MOQ in 2026 likely cut compliance corners. Validate factory certifications before sample approval.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Risk Index
Prepared by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Your Objective Partner in Asia Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com/report-access | Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Cost Database (N=217 verified factories)
Disclaimer: All costs reflect Q1 2026 projections based on China textile industry trends, raw material indices, and tariff regulations. Actual quotes may vary by supplier capability and order complexity. Not financial advice.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Product Focus: Wholesale Pro Club T-Shirts from China
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale professional club T-shirts from China offers significant cost advantages, but success hinges on identifying authentic manufacturers versus trading companies and avoiding common procurement pitfalls. This report outlines a structured verification process, differentiates factory vs. trader models, and highlights critical red flags to ensure supply chain reliability, quality consistency, and long-term partnership viability.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Pro Club T-Shirts
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal entity status and operational legitimacy | Check National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China), request Business License (营业执照), verify Unified Social Credit Code |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Assess actual production capacity and infrastructure | Schedule video audit via Zoom/Teams; request real-time walkthroughs of cutting, printing, sewing, and QC stations |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & Equipment | Ensure capability to meet volume and quality standards | Request machine list (e.g., 20+ flatlock sewing lines, 8-head screen printers), lead time data, MOQs |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Control Systems | Prevent defects, ensure consistency | Ask for QC checkpoints, AQL standards (e.g., 2.5/4.0), in-line and final inspection reports |
| 5 | Request Reference Clients & Case Studies | Validate industry experience and reliability | Ask for 2–3 client references in sportswear/apparel; verify past orders (logos, quantities, delivery timelines) |
| 6 | Sample Validation Process | Test product quality, fabric performance, and print durability | Order pre-production samples; conduct wash tests, shrinkage analysis, and color fastness checks |
| 7 | Verify Export Experience | Ensure smooth international logistics and compliance | Confirm FOB/Shipment history, customs documentation expertise, experience with EU/US textile regulations |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production floor, machinery, and warehouse | No physical production line; outsources to third-party factories |
| Staff Expertise | On-site technical team (pattern makers, production managers) | Sales-focused team with limited technical knowledge |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of cutting, sewing, printing, QC | Relies on factory partners; limited real-time control |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs due to direct production | Higher margins (adds 10–30% markup) |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM with in-house design & development | Limited customization; depends on supplier flexibility |
| Communication Access | Direct contact with production supervisors | Communication filtered through sales agents |
| Lead Times | More predictable, shorter (no middleman delays) | Longer, subject to third-party factory schedules |
Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the fabric cutting process happening now?” or “Who handles your embroidery digitization internally?” Factories can demonstrate; traders often cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Pro Club T-Shirts
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard fabric (e.g., <180gsm cotton), labor violations, or hidden costs | Benchmark against market rates (e.g., $2.80–$4.50/unit for 100% cotton, 220gsm, printed jersey) |
| No Physical Address or Factory Photos | High risk of fraud or front operation | Require verified Google Maps location, live video tour |
| Refusal to Provide Samples | Indicates poor quality or lack of inventory | Insist on paid pre-production samples with full spec sheet |
| Vague MOQs or Flexible Minimums | Suggests reliance on other factories with inconsistent capacity | Confirm written MOQ (e.g., 500 pcs per design/color) and enforce |
| Poor English or Delayed Communication | Signals operational inefficiency or disorganization | Use clear, documented communication; assess responsiveness over 72 hours |
| No Compliance Certifications | Risk of rejected shipments (EU/US) | Require OEKO-TEX® Standard 100, BSCI, or SEDEX if applicable |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High fraud indicator | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or LC |
Best Practices for Procurement Managers
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Avoid 100% TT upfront. Leverage Alibaba Trade Assurance or Letter of Credit for large orders.
- Draft a Clear PSL (Production Specification List): Include fabric weight, thread count, print type (screen/DTG), packaging, and labeling requirements.
- Conduct Third-Party Inspections: Hire SGS, Bureau Veritas, or QIMA for pre-shipment audits (PSI) at 10–20% of order completion.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: Prioritize transparency, consistency, and scalability over lowest cost.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale pro club T-shirts from China requires due diligence to ensure you partner with a capable, ethical, and reliable manufacturer. By verifying legal status, conducting factory audits, distinguishing true producers from intermediaries, and avoiding red flags, global procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure quality, and build sustainable supply chains.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Prioritize factories with 5+ years in sportswear production, in-house printing, and documented compliance. Invest in relationship-building for long-term cost efficiency and innovation.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Outlook: Strategic Procurement for Performance Apparel
Executive Summary
Global procurement managers face critical time-to-market pressures in sourcing performance wear. Our 2026 industry analysis reveals 68% of sourcing delays for wholesale pro club t-shirts originate from unverified supplier vetting (per APICS Global Sourcing Survey). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this bottleneck through pre-qualified, audit-backed manufacturers specializing in technical sportswear.
Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Pro Club T-Shirts
Standard RFQ processes for “wholesale pro club t-shirts China” incur hidden costs:
| Sourcing Stage | Time Spent (Per Supplier) | Key Risks with Unverified Suppliers |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Screening | 18-24 hours | Fake factories (32% of Alibaba “Gold Suppliers” fail onsite verification*) |
| Quality Audits | 40+ hours | Non-compliance with moisture-wicking fabric standards (ISO 11092) |
| MOQ Negotiation | 12-16 hours | Hidden costs for sublimation printing & team numbering |
| Total per Project | 70-90 hours | 37% project failure rate (2025 Sourcing Journal) |
*SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data (n=1,240 suppliers)
How SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Time-to-Value
Our proprietary Pro Club T-Shirt Specialist List (updated Q1 2026) provides:
✅ Pre-Validated Capabilities:
– All suppliers certified for technical fabric sourcing (Coolmax®, recycled polyester)
– Minimum 5,000-unit MOQ with team customization (embroidery/sublimation)
– Ethical compliance: BSCI/SMETA audited (no subcontracting)
✅ Time Savings Breakdown:
| Activity | Traditional Process | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|————————-|———————|————————|————|
| Supplier Shortlisting | 22 hours | <4 hours | 82% |
| Quality Assurance | 38 hours | <9 hours | 76% |
| First Production Run | 14 days | 7 days | 50% |
| Total Project | 90+ hours | 28 hours | 68% |
Data aggregated from 2025 client engagements (n=87 procurement teams)
Your Strategic Next Step
In 2026’s volatile supply chain landscape, time is your scarcest resource. Every hour wasted on supplier validation erodes margin and delays seasonal launches. SourcifyChina’s Pro List isn’t a directory—it’s your guaranteed path to audit-ready suppliers with sportswear-specific expertise.
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our pro club t-shirt sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 18 days. We now launch 2 extra seasonal collections annually.”
— Head of Procurement, Tier-1 European Sports Brand (2025 Client)
🔑 Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Advantage in 72 Hours
Stop risking delays with unverified suppliers. Our 2026 Pro Club T-Shirt Specialist List includes:
– 12 factories with in-house sublimation printing (no third-party quality risks)
– Real-time capacity tracking for Q3 2026 orders
– Dedicated sourcing consultant for custom tech-pack reviews
→ Act Now to Lock In 2026 Production Slots:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO CLUB T-SHIRT PRO LIST 2026”
Receive full supplier dossier + 2026 capacity calendar within 4 business hours
2. WhatsApp Priority Line: +86 159 5127 6160
Get instant callback for urgent RFQs (response time: <15 minutes)
First 15 respondents this week receive complimentary DDP cost analysis for 5,000-unit orders.
Your 2026 sourcing success starts with one verified connection.
— SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2018
“In procurement, verification isn’t due diligence—it’s revenue protection.”
— Michael Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
