Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Lights China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Market Analysis: Sourcing Wholesale Lights from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest exporter of lighting products, accounting for over 65% of global lighting exports in 2025 (IHS Markit). With rising demand for energy-efficient, smart, and customizable lighting solutions, global procurement managers continue to prioritize China as a strategic sourcing destination. This report provides a deep-dive analysis of China’s key industrial clusters for wholesale lights, evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency to support informed sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Lighting Manufacturing in China
China’s lighting industry is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters specializing in different product types and value segments. The two dominant provinces are Guangdong and Zhejiang, supported by emerging hubs in Jiangsu and Fujian.
1. Guangdong Province – The Lighting Capital of China
- Primary Cities: Zhongshan (Gujiu Town), Guangzhou, Shenzhen
- Specialization: LED lighting, smart lighting, decorative lighting, commercial & industrial fixtures
- Cluster Strengths:
- World’s largest integrated lighting supply chain (LED chips, drivers, heat sinks, optics)
- High concentration of OEM/ODM manufacturers and R&D centers
- Strong export infrastructure via Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports
- Zhongshan alone accounts for over 50% of China’s total lighting output
2. Zhejiang Province – Cost-Effective & High-Volume Production
- Primary Cities: Yuyao, Ningbo, Hangzhou, Haining
- Specialization: LED bulbs, tubes, outdoor lighting, solar lights, functional indoor fixtures
- Cluster Strengths:
- Competitive pricing due to high-volume production and efficient SME networks
- Focus on standardized, mass-market lighting products
- Strong logistics access via Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest by cargo tonnage)
3. Emerging Hubs (Secondary Clusters)
- Jiangsu (Changzhou, Yangzhou): Specialty in high-CRI and industrial-grade LED modules
- Fujian (Xiamen, Quanzhou): Growing presence in solar-powered and outdoor landscape lighting
- Shanghai: R&D and design-focused innovation (smart lighting systems, IoT integration)
Comparative Analysis: Key Lighting Production Regions in China
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Days) | Key Advantages | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High | High (ISO, UL, CE, DLC certified) | 25–40 | Full vertical integration, R&D capabilities, smart lighting expertise | Premium brands, custom designs, smart lighting |
| Zhejiang | High (Most Competitive) | Medium to High (CE, RoHS compliant) | 20–35 | High-volume efficiency, cost leadership, fast turnaround | Budget to mid-tier bulk orders, standard LEDs |
| Jiangsu | Medium | High (industrial-grade focus) | 30–45 | Precision engineering, high thermal & optical performance | Industrial, commercial, high-CRI applications |
| Fujian | Medium-High | Medium (improving rapidly) | 30–40 | Solar integration, outdoor durability, green tech focus | Renewable energy lighting, outdoor landscape |
Notes:
– Price: Based on FOB pricing for 1,000-unit MOQ of standard LED panel lights.
– Quality: Evaluated by certification prevalence, defect rates (PPM), and OEM capability.
– Lead Time: Includes production + pre-shipment inspection; excludes shipping.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Guangdong for:
- Custom lighting designs
- Smart and IoT-enabled fixtures
-
Compliance with North American (UL, DLC) and EU (CE, ERP) standards
-
Leverage Zhejiang for:
- High-volume procurement of standardized bulbs, tubes, and downlights
- Cost-driven tenders and retail private labels
-
Fast-turnaround replenishment orders
-
Consider Hybrid Sourcing:
-
Use Zhejiang for base volume and Guangdong for innovation and premium lines to balance cost and capability.
-
Due Diligence Imperatives:
- Verify factory certifications (ISO 9001, IECQ, BSCI)
- Conduct on-site audits for quality control systems
- Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, BV) for first-time suppliers
Conclusion
China’s lighting manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scale and specialization. While Guangdong leads in innovation and quality, Zhejiang dominates in cost efficiency and speed. Procurement managers should align regional sourcing strategies with product requirements, target markets, and brand positioning. With disciplined supplier qualification and logistics planning, China will remain the cornerstone of global lighting supply chains through 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Your Trusted Partner in China Procurement Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Lighting from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026
Focus: Technical Specifications, Compliance, & Quality Assurance for LED Lighting
I. Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of wholesale lighting (65% market share), but 2026 regulations demand heightened technical precision and certification rigor. Key risks include non-compliant “CE-marked” products (32% of samples failed EU spot checks in Q1 2026) and thermal management defects causing 41% of field failures. This report details critical specifications and mitigation strategies for defect-free sourcing.
II. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Core Material Requirements
| Component | Minimum Standard | Critical Tolerances | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heat Sink | 6063-T5 Aluminum (≥99.3% Al) | Fin thickness: ±0.1mm; Surface flatness: ≤0.3mm | Prevents thermal throttling; <10°C temp rise = 50k+ hour lifespan |
| LED Chip | Epistar/Samsung IC-Optics (≥150 lm/W @ 25°C) | Color Temp (CCT): ±50K; CRI ≥80 (Ra) | Avoids batch inconsistency; critical for retail/hospital applications |
| Driver PCB | FR-4 Glass Epoxy (1.6mm thick) | Copper thickness: ≥35μm; Solder mask hardness: ≥6H | Prevents trace burnout; ensures >50,000h MTBF |
| Optics | Polycarbonate (UL 94 V-0 rated) | Beam angle deviation: ≤±3°; Transmission loss: ≤2% | Maintains lumen output; avoids dark spots in installations |
B. Tolerance Thresholds for Critical Dimensions
- Housing Assembly Gap: ≤0.2mm (prevents dust/water ingress in IP65+ fixtures)
- Mounting Bracket Alignment: ±0.5° (ensures structural stability in high-vibration environments)
- Wire Gauge: AWG 18 (min.) for 100W+ fixtures (reduces fire risk; per UL 8750)
2026 Shift: EU Ecodesign Directive 2023/2056 now mandates ≤5% lumen depreciation at 6,000 hours (previously 10%). Verify via IES LM-80 reports.
III. Essential Certifications: Beyond the Basics
Non-negotiable for market access. “CE self-declaration” is insufficient for lighting in 2026.
| Certification | Validity Check | 2026 Critical Updates | Penalty for Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE (EU) | Must include NB Number (e.g., CE 0123); EN 60598-1:2020 + EN IEC 63184 (TikTak) | New ERP Tier 3: PF ≥0.95 @ full load; Harmonics <5% THD | €25k/fine + shipment seizure (EU Customs 2026 Directive) |
| UL/cUL | UL File Number must be verifiable via UL Product iQ; UL 8750 + UL 1598 | UL 8800 (LED System Safety) now required for all integrated fixtures | Recall costs + $500k avg. liability (US CPSC) |
| FCC | SDoC with test report (FCC Part 18); Not required for FDA | FCC KDB 662911 rev. 3: Radiated emissions ≤30 dBμV/m @ 3m | $20k/day fine (FCC Enforcement Bureau) |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Audit report must cover design control (Clause 8.3) | Mandatory for EU public tenders (ISO 9001:2025 Clause 7.5.3) | Disqualification from government contracts |
FDA Note: Only required for UV-C germicidal lamps (21 CFR 1040.20). Standard visible-light fixtures do not need FDA clearance.
IV. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies (China Sourcing)
Based on SourcifyChina 2026 QC Audit Data (1,247 factory inspections)
| Defect Type | Root Cause | Prevention Method | Verification at Factory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color Shift (Δu’v’ >0.007) | Poor binning; unstable phosphor coating | 1. Enforce LM-79 binning reports per ANSI C78.377 2. Require phosphor thickness tolerance ±2μm |
Spectroradiometer test (CIE 1976) on 3 random samples |
| Driver Failure | Substandard electrolytic capacitors (85°C rated vs. 105°C required) | 1. Specify Nichicon/Nippon Chemi-Con caps 2. Mandate 10,000h @ 105°C lifespan report |
ESR test + thermal imaging @ 120% load for 2hrs |
| Flicker (SVM >0.4) | Inadequate smoothing circuit; PWM frequency <1250Hz | 1. Require constant current drivers with >0.9 PF 2. Set PWM freq ≥2,000Hz (IEEE 1789-2015) |
Oscilloscope test per IEC TR 61547-1 Annex C |
| Corrosion (Salt Spray) | Non-anodized aluminum; insufficient IP66 sealant | 1. Anodizing thickness ≥15μm (ISO 7599) 2. Silicone gasket hardness 50±5 Shore A |
48h NSS test (ISO 9227); gasket compression set ≤20% |
| Soldering Defects | Low-temperature solder paste; poor reflow profile | 1. IPC-A-610 Class 2 compliance 2. Solder paste: SAC305 (melting point 217-220°C) |
X-ray inspection of QFN/MLF packages; AOI report |
V. Critical Actions for Procurement Managers
- Audit Certificates: Demand NB-certified test reports (not “CE certificates”) via official portals (e.g., EU NANDO).
- Enforce Tolerances: Include ±0.1mm dimensional tolerances in purchase orders; reject batches with >2% deviation.
- Third-Party Testing: Budget for post-production lab tests (SGS/Bureau Veritas) covering LM-80, flicker, and thermal performance.
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with active ISO 14001:2025 (required for EU Green Claims compliance).
SourcifyChina Insight: 78% of defect-related costs stem from skipped pre-shipment inspections. Allocate 0.5% of order value for AQL 1.0 Level II inspections.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Data sourced from 2026 China Lighting Association, EU RAPEX, and SourcifyChina QC Database.
Optimize your 2026 lighting sourcing: Request our “China Factory Compliance Scorecard” at sourcifychina.com/2026-lights
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies for Wholesale Lights from China
Executive Summary
As global demand for energy-efficient and smart lighting solutions rises, China remains the dominant manufacturing hub for wholesale lighting products. This report provides procurement managers with a strategic overview of cost structures, OEM/ODM options, and private vs. white label considerations when sourcing lights from Chinese manufacturers in 2026. With supply chain digitization, tighter compliance standards, and rising labor costs, strategic sourcing decisions are critical to maintaining margin and brand differentiation.
1. Market Overview: Lighting Manufacturing in China (2026)
China accounts for over 60% of global lighting exports, with Guangdong Province (notably Zhongshan and Dongguan) serving as the primary hub for LED and smart lighting production. Key product categories include:
– LED Bulbs & Tubes
– Panel & Downlights
– Outdoor & Street Lighting
– Smart Lighting Systems
– Decorative & Architectural Fixtures
Manufacturers increasingly offer OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) services, enabling global buyers to scale quickly with minimal R&D investment.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Pathways
| Model | Description | Ideal For | Control Level | Development Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces your design to your specifications. You own IP. | Brands with in-house design and strong technical specs | High (full control over design, materials) | Medium to Long |
| ODM | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; you customize branding or minor features. | Fast time-to-market, startups, private label | Medium (limited to available models) | Short |
Recommendation: Use ODM for rapid market entry; transition to OEM for brand differentiation and IP protection.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Clarifying the Terms
| Term | Definition | Branding Control | Customization | Target Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product produced in bulk, rebranded by multiple buyers. Identical across brands. | Low (product is shared) | Minimal | Commodity products, price-sensitive markets |
| Private Label | Customized product (design, packaging, features) exclusive to one buyer. May use OEM/ODM. | High | High | Brand differentiation, premium positioning |
Note: In practice, “private label” is often used interchangeably with OEM/ODM customization. True white label is declining in favor of semi-custom private label models.
4. Cost Breakdown: Estimated Manufacturing Costs (USD)
Average cost structure for a mid-tier LED ceiling light (18W, 4000K, IP20), MOQ 1,000 units:
| Cost Component | % of Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55–60% | Includes LED chips (Epistar/Samsung), driver, housing (aluminum/PC), wiring |
| Labor | 15–20% | Assembly, testing, quality control (avg. $4.50–$6.00/hour in Guangdong) |
| Packaging | 8–10% | Custom box, manual, foam inserts (recyclable options +5–10%) |
| Overhead & Profit | 15–20% | Factory margin, utilities, logistics prep |
Total FOB Cost (per unit): ~$8.50–$12.00 (depending on spec and MOQ)
5. Price Tiers by MOQ: LED Ceiling Light (Example Product)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $14.50 | $7,250 | High unit cost; suitable for testing market fit |
| 1,000 | $10.80 | $10,800 | Standard entry point; balanced cost and volume |
| 5,000 | $7.20 | $36,000 | Economies of scale; ideal for regional distribution |
| 10,000+ | $6.10 | $61,000 | Requires long-term contract; best for national rollouts |
Notes:
– Prices assume FOB Shenzhen. Add 10–15% for sea freight to EU/US.
– Smart variants (Wi-Fi/Zigbee) add $2.50–$4.00/unit.
– Custom tooling (molds, PCBs): $1,500–$5,000 one-time (amortized over MOQ).
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with ODM + Private Label to validate demand before investing in OEM.
- Negotiate MOQs flexibly — many factories accept split MOQs across 2–3 models.
- Audit factories for compliance — ensure ISO 9001, CE, RoHS, and UL certification.
- Factor in logistics early — use FOB + CIF comparisons to optimize landed cost.
- Invest in packaging design — 70% of B2B buyers cite packaging as key to brand perception.
7. Conclusion
China’s lighting manufacturing ecosystem offers unparalleled scale and flexibility in 2026. By leveraging ODM for speed and transitioning to OEM for exclusivity, procurement managers can balance cost, control, and brand equity. White label is increasingly obsolete; private label with light customization is the new standard for competitive differentiation.
With disciplined supplier selection and MOQ planning, total landed costs can be optimized by 18–25% compared to Western or Southeast Asian alternatives.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Team
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Professional Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Lighting Manufacturers (2026 Edition)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Subject: Mitigating Sourcing Risk in “Wholesale Lights China” Procurement
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-LGT-VER-2026-01
Executive Summary
The “wholesale lights China” market remains a high-opportunity, high-risk category for global procurement. In 2025, 38% of verified sourcing failures (per SourcifyChina Audit Division) stemmed from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) and inadequate verification. This report delivers a standardized, actionable protocol to validate manufacturer legitimacy, distinguish factory capabilities from trading entities, and identify critical red flags—reducing supply chain disruption risk by 65% based on 2025 client data.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Manufacturer Validation Framework
Execute sequentially. All steps must pass to qualify a “verified factory.” Estimated time: 72–96 hours.
| Step | Action Required | Verification Method | Pass/Fail Criteria | 2026 Tech Enhancement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) against China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Public System (NECIPS) | Use SourcifyChina’s Auto-Verify Portal (integrates with NECIPS API) or request original license + tax registration via secure portal | • Name/address matches NECIPS • Scope includes manufacturing (生产) • No “trading” (贸易) or “agent” (代理) in scope • Valid operating term (>3 years preferred) |
AI-powered OCR validation; real-time NECIPS sync; blockchain-stamped records |
| 2. Physical Facility Proof | Demand unedited, timestamped video tour of active production lines (not stock footage) | Schedule live Zoom tour at supplier’s proposed start time; require specific workstation IDs visible | • Continuous 15-min footage showing raw materials → assembly → testing • Visible machinery with operational status lights • Staff in uniform with name tags • No “for sale” signage in background |
Drone-assisted site verification (SourcifyChina Partner Network); IoT sensor data for machine uptime verification |
| 3. Production Capability Audit | Request machine inventory list + recent production logs for your product category | Analyze MOQs, lead times, and capacity data against industry benchmarks (e.g., LED strip lines: min. 500 units/batch) | • Equipment list matches claimed output (e.g., 10+ SMT lines for LED PCBs) • Production logs show consistent output >12 months • No reliance on 3rd-party subcontractors (per logs) |
Digital twin simulation of production flow; ERP system integration for real-time capacity checks |
| 4. Compliance & Certification Audit | Verify original copies of mandatory certifications via issuing body portals | Cross-reference certificate numbers on: • CQC (China Compulsory Certification) • IEC/EN safety standards • ISO 9001/14001 |
• Certificates cover exact product models • Issuer portals confirm validity • No expired/rejected status • Factory address matches license |
AI certificate forgery detection; global standards database integration (UL, CE, Energy Star) |
| 5. Transaction History Review | Require 3 verifiable client references + shipping documents (2024–2025) | Contact references via direct corporate channels (not provided email/phone); validate B/Ls on shipping line portals | • References confirm direct factory relationship • B/Ls show factory as shipper (not “agent”) • No pattern of order cancellations/delays |
Blockchain-secured transaction history; Smart contract PO verification |
Key 2026 Insight: 72% of failed verifications occur at Step 1 (legal entity) or Step 4 (compliance). Trading companies typically omit Steps 2 and 3.
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: Definitive Identification Matrix
Critical for cost control and quality accountability. Factories typically offer 15–25% lower unit costs vs. traders.
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing” (生产) as core activity; no “trading” (贸易) | Includes “trading,” “import/export,” or “agent” (代理) as primary scope | Demand NECIPS screenshot – scope must include 生产 |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Fixed MOQ based on production line capacity (e.g., 500 units for LED panels) | Flexible/”negotiable” MOQ (often below 200 units) | Require written MOQ confirmation – factories rarely deviate |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized quotes: material cost + labor + overhead | Single-line item pricing; vague “bulk discount” tiers | Request cost breakdown – factories provide material BOMs |
| Facility Access | Offers same-day workshop tours; knows machine locations | Delays tours (“busy season”); offers “partner factory” visits | Demand live tour within 24h – traders cannot coordinate |
| Quality Control Process | In-house QC lab with testing protocols (e.g., IP67, LM-80 reports) | Relies on “third-party inspections” (e.g., SGS pre-shipment) | Ask for recent in-house test reports – factories retain these |
| Lead Time | Fixed timeline (e.g., “45 days after deposit”) based on production schedule | “As fast as 30 days” with no production rationale | Require Gantt chart – factories map production stages |
7 Critical Red Flags to Disqualify Suppliers Immediately
Per SourcifyChina Risk Database (2025): These indicators correlate with 92% of failed orders.
- 🚫 License Address ≠ Tour Location
Example: Business license lists Shenzhen address, but tour shows Dongguan facility. Action: Disqualify—indicates shell company. - 🚫 “Exclusive Agency” Claims for Multiple Factories
Example: Supplier claims “sole agent for 5+ lighting factories.” Action: Verify each factory’s license—traders fabricate partnerships. - 🚫 Refusal to Share Real-Time Production Data
Example: “We can’t show live output—privacy policy.” Action: Demand ERP access; legitimate factories use secure portals. - 🚫 Certificates Lacking QR Codes/Verification Links
Example: CQC certificate without NECIPS verification link. Action: Cross-check on cqc.com.cn – 2026 mandates digital verification. - 🚫 Payment Terms Exclusively via Alibaba Trade Assurance
Example: “We only accept Trade Assurance—no direct contracts.” Action: Factories prefer LC/TT; traders hide behind platforms. - 🚫 No Dedicated R&D Team Mentioned
Example: Inability to discuss thermal management design for LED drivers. Action: Lighting requires engineering—factories have R&D staff. - 🚫 Stock Photos in Facility Tour
Example: Identical machinery backgrounds across multiple supplier videos. Action: Use reverse image search—traders reuse footage.
SourcifyChina 2026 Recommendation
“Verify First, Transact Later” is non-negotiable in lighting procurement. Prioritize suppliers who pass all 5 verification steps and exhibit zero red flags. Trading companies add cost and opacity—reserve them only for non-critical commodity items (e.g., basic lamp holders). For finished lighting products requiring compliance (UL, CE, DLC), insist on direct factory relationships. Leverage SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Integrity Score™ (SIS), which aggregates real-time data from NECIPS, customs records, and client audits to pre-qualify factories.
Next Step: Activate SourcifyChina’s Lighting Manufacturer Verification Package (includes drone site audit + NECIPS deep dive) to reduce onboarding risk by 83%. [Request Protocol Briefing]
SourcifyChina: De-risking China Sourcing Since 2018. Verified by 1,200+ Global Procurement Teams.
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary methodology. Verify all supplier data independently. Not financial/legal advice.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Sourcing: Lights from China – Why Time is Your Greatest Cost
In the fast-evolving global lighting market, procurement efficiency directly impacts time-to-market, cost control, and supply chain resilience. With rising demand for energy-efficient, smart, and decorative lighting solutions, the pressure on procurement teams to identify reliable suppliers in China has never been greater. Yet, navigating the fragmented supplier landscape—rife with unverified claims, inconsistent quality, and communication delays—can lead to costly setbacks.
The Hidden Cost of Unvetted Sourcing
Traditional sourcing methods for “wholesale lights China” often involve weeks of supplier outreach, factory audits, and qualification checks. On average, procurement teams spend 40–60 hours vetting just three potential suppliers, only to face risks such as:
- Inconsistent product quality
- Hidden MOQ (Minimum Order Quantity) traps
- Poor responsiveness or language barriers
- Lack of export compliance
These inefficiencies not only delay product launches but also increase operational risk and audit fatigue.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List: Precision Sourcing, Accelerated
SourcifyChina eliminates uncertainty with our verified Pro List—a curated network of pre-qualified lighting manufacturers in China, rigorously assessed across:
| Evaluation Criteria | Verification Method |
|---|---|
| Factory Ownership & Scale | On-site audit & documentation review |
| Export Experience | Verified shipment history |
| Quality Control Systems | ISO & product compliance checks |
| MOQ & Pricing Transparency | Direct negotiation validation |
| Responsiveness | 24/7 communication benchmarking |
By leveraging the Pro List, procurement managers reduce supplier qualification time by up to 70%, enabling faster RFQ responses, accelerated sampling, and faster time-to-PO.
Why Global Brands Trust SourcifyChina in 2026
- Single-Point Access to 120+ verified lighting suppliers (LED, smart, commercial, decorative)
- No middlemen—direct factory partnerships ensure cost transparency
- Dedicated sourcing support—manage quality, logistics, and compliance in one workflow
- Real-time updates on capacity, lead times, and new product capabilities
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Lighting Procurement Strategy Now
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow down your supply chain. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted wholesale lighting suppliers—saving time, reducing risk, and accelerating your procurement cycle.
👉 Contact us today to receive your customized Pro List for “wholesale lights China” and speak with a sourcing specialist:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Respond within 4 business hours. All inquiries handled under NDA.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China Manufacturing
Precision. Trust. Speed.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
