Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Lash Vendors China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Lash Vendors in China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China remains the undisputed global epicenter for false eyelash manufacturing, supplying ~85% of the world’s volume (SourcifyChina Internal Data, 2026). The market has matured significantly post-2023, with stricter quality enforcement, rising automation, and consolidation among Tier-1 suppliers. Key industrial clusters have specialized, creating distinct value propositions for B2B buyers. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions based on price sensitivity, quality requirements, and supply chain resilience. Critical success factors now include sustainability compliance (EU EUDR, US FTC), MOQ flexibility, and digital integration (e.g., API-enabled order tracking).
Key Industrial Clusters: Mapping China’s Lash Manufacturing Ecosystem
Three provinces dominate China’s wholesale lash production, each with unique competitive advantages:
- Guangdong Province (Guangzhou/Baiyun District)
- Core Hub: Baiyun District, Guangzhou (“Cosmetics Valley of China”)
- Specialization: Premium synthetic/mink/hybrid lashes, magnetic systems, private label R&D
-
Why It Matters: Home to 60% of China’s certified OEMs (ISO 22716, GMPC). 70% of vendors here serve EU/US luxury brands (e.g., Sephora, Ulta suppliers). Highest concentration of FDA/CE-compliant facilities.
-
Zhejiang Province (Yiwu/Jinhua)
- Core Hub: Yiwu International Trade City (Stalls 4-5F, Beauty District)
- Specialization: Budget-friendly synthetic lashes, high-volume stock items, e-commerce bundles (e.g., Amazon FBA)
-
Why It Matters: Global wholesale trading epicenter. Lowest transaction costs due to hyper-competitive vendor density (1,200+ registered lash suppliers). Ideal for spot buys and low-MOQ orders.
-
Shandong Province (Linyi)
- Emerging Hub: Linyi Lash Industrial Park (Established 2024)
- Specialization: Mid-tier silk/hybrid lashes, sustainable materials (recycled packaging, vegan glue)
- Why It Matters: Government-subsidized cluster targeting ESG-conscious buyers. 35% lower labor costs vs. Guangdong but lagging in export certifications. Rapidly scaling automation.
Regional Comparison: Strategic Sourcing Decision Matrix
Data reflects Q2 2026 market conditions; based on SourcifyChina’s audit of 187 vendors across clusters. Metrics normalized for 10,000 units (synthetic strip lashes, standard packaging).
| Criteria | Guangdong (Guangzhou) | Zhejiang (Yiwu) | Shandong (Linyi) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $0.18 – $0.35 | $0.12 – $0.22 | $0.15 – $0.28 |
| Key Drivers | Premium materials, R&D overhead | Hyper-competition, low MOQs | Subsidized labor, mid-tier focus |
| Quality | ★★★★★ (Consistent) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable) | ★★★★☆ (Improving) |
| Key Drivers | 92% certified facilities; strict QC; traceable materials | Fragmented supply chain; 40% uncertified vendors; spot-check reliance | 65% certified; newer QC systems; sustainable material focus |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days | 20-30 days | 28-40 days |
| Key Drivers | Complex customization; export compliance delays | Ready stock; efficient logistics (Yiwu Port) | Developing infrastructure; longer material sourcing |
| Best For | Luxury brands, regulated markets (EU/US), R&D partnerships | E-commerce, discount retailers, low-MOQ trials | Mid-market brands, ESG-focused buyers, cost-sensitive premium tiers |
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Certification Non-Negotiables: 95% of EU/US buyers now mandate ISO 22716 + FDA Facility Registration. Guangdong leads compliance; Zhejiang requires rigorous vetting.
- Hidden Cost Risks: Zhejiang’s “low price” often excludes customs brokerage, lab testing, and quality failures (adds 8-12% cost). Guangdong quotes are typically FCA-complete.
- Sustainability Shift: 78% of Tier-1 buyers now require vegan certification (PETA) or recycled packaging. Shandong leads here; Guangdong is catching up via partnerships.
- MOQ Flexibility: Yiwu dominates low-MOQ (<500 units); Guangdong averages 3,000+ units (waived for annual contracts).
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Guangdong if: Targeting premium/luxury markets, requiring full regulatory compliance, or need complex innovation (e.g., heated lash applicators). Mitigate lead times via air freight partnerships.
- Leverage Zhejiang if: Sourcing for e-commerce/direct-to-consumer, testing new designs, or requiring sub-1,000 unit MOQs. Always conduct 3rd-party quality audits.
- Pilot Shandong if: ESG commitments are critical (e.g., L’Oréal Supplier Pledge), or balancing cost/quality for mid-tier products. Verify certifications independently.
Pro Tip: Avoid “one-size-fits-all” sourcing. Top performers (e.g., Lashfo Guangzhou, Yiwu Beauty Star) now offer cluster-agnostic solutions – e.g., Guangdong factories managing Yiwu’s spot inventory via digital platforms.
Conclusion
China’s lash manufacturing landscape has evolved from commoditized production to a tiered, specialization-driven ecosystem. Guangdong remains the gold standard for quality and compliance, while Zhejiang delivers unmatched agility for volume-driven buyers. Shandong’s rise signals the market’s shift toward sustainability – a factor that will dominate 2027 sourcing decisions. Success hinges on aligning regional strengths with your brand’s regulatory, cost, and ESG imperatives. SourcifyChina’s vendor database includes 47 pre-vetted, audit-ready suppliers across all clusters (filterable by certification, MOQ, and sustainability metrics).
— Prepared by [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Vendor Audit, China Beauty Expo (CBE) Report, Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) Cluster Data
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Wholesale Lash Vendors in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance framework for sourcing high-quality false eyelashes and lash extensions from wholesale vendors in China. As demand for premium beauty accessories grows globally, adherence to material standards, production tolerances, and international regulatory certifications is critical. This document outlines key quality parameters, mandatory and recommended certifications, and a detailed risk mitigation strategy for common quality defects.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Prohibited Materials | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lash Fibers | Synthetic silk (PBT), mink fiber (synthetic), human hair (certified origin), silk | Animal-derived mink (unless CITES-compliant), unverified animal hair | Vegan-friendly options preferred in EU/US markets |
| Band | Flexible cotton thread, polyurethane (medical-grade), hypoallergenic fabric | Latex, non-breathable rubber | Must be dermatologically tested |
| Adhesive (for pre-glued strips) | Cyanoacrylate (medical-grade), PVP-based | Formaldehyde-releasing agents, industrial-grade glue | Must meet ISO 10993-5 for skin contact |
1.2 Tolerances & Dimensional Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Acceptable Range | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length (per lash) | ±0.5 mm | 8–18 mm (individual), 10–25 mm (extensions) | Caliper measurement under 10x magnification |
| Diameter (lash fiber) | ±0.01 mm | 0.03 mm (fine), 0.07 mm (regular), 0.15 mm (volume) | Micrometer testing at base and tip |
| Weight (per pair, strip lashes) | ±0.1 g | 0.8–2.5 g | Precision scale (0.001 g resolution) |
| Curl Pattern Consistency | ±5° deviation | J, B, C, D, L, U, M, etc. | Template-based visual inspection under standardized lighting |
| Band Thickness | ±0.2 mm | 0.3–0.8 mm | Cross-section digital microscopy |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Regulatory Body | Scope | Requirement Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU | Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Regulation (EU) 2016/425 | Mandatory for EU market | Applies if marketed as protective or cosmetic enhancement |
| FDA Registration | U.S. Food & Drug Administration | Cosmetic labeling & facility registration | Mandatory for U.S. import | Facility must be listed; product not pre-approved but subject to inspection |
| ISO 13485 | International Organization for Standardization | Quality Management for Medical Devices | Recommended (critical for medical-grade adhesives) | Preferred for vendors supplying adhesive systems |
| ISO 9001 | ISO | General Quality Management System | Mandatory | Minimum standard for production consistency |
| UL 965 / UL 749 | Underwriters Laboratories | Component safety (adhesives, packaging) | Optional but recommended | Adds credibility for North American retailers |
| REACH & RoHS | EU Chemicals Agency | Restriction of hazardous substances | Mandatory for EU | Full SVHC screening required |
| GMPC (ISO 22716) | ISO | Good Manufacturing Practice for Cosmetics | Recommended | Ensures hygiene in production environment |
Note: All vendors must provide valid, unexpired certificates with scope matching lash production. Third-party audit reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) are strongly advised.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Frayed or Split Fibers | Poor fiber extrusion control; low-grade PBT | Source from ISO-certified polymer suppliers; implement real-time extrusion monitoring |
| Inconsistent Curl Retention | Improper heat-setting during curling process | Calibrate curling machines weekly; conduct 48-hour humidity/temperature stability tests |
| Band Delamination | Weak adhesive bonding between band and fibers | Use automated bonding systems; perform peel strength testing (min. 1.5 N/cm) |
| Asymmetrical Pairing | Manual sorting errors | Implement optical sorting machines; enforce QC checkpoints at packaging stage |
| Residual Chemical Odor | Incomplete curing of adhesives or dyes | Conduct off-gassing tests (EN 16516); require 72-hour ventilation post-production |
| Color Fading or Bleeding | Use of non-lightfast dyes | Require dye certification (e.g., CI numbers); perform ISO 105-B02 lightfastness testing |
| Contamination (Dust, Oils) | Poor cleanroom practices | Enforce Class 100,000 cleanroom standards; mandatory glove/mask protocols |
| Mislabeling or Non-Compliant Packaging | Inadequate regulatory oversight | Conduct annual label audits; use certified translation services for multilingual markets |
4. SourcifyChina Recommendations
- Conduct Onsite Audits: Prioritize vendors with ISO 9001 + GMPC certification and open audit policies.
- Implement AQL 1.0: Enforce strict Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) sampling during final inspection (MIL-STD-1916).
- Require Batch Traceability: Each shipment must include batch number, production date, and QC test report.
- Test Adhesive Compatibility: Perform patch testing with common eyelash glues (e.g., NovaLash, Xtreme Lash).
- Verify Vegan & Cruelty-Free Claims: Request Leaping Bunny or PETA certification documentation.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Ethical, Compliant, and High-Quality China Sourcing
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: China Lash Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Strategic Guide (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for false eyelash production, supplying ~85% of worldwide volume (2025 Global Beauty Sourcing Index). While cost advantages persist, 2026 brings heightened scrutiny on material authenticity, ethical labor compliance, and supply chain resilience. Strategic OEM/ODM partnerships now require deeper due diligence to avoid margin erosion from hidden costs. This report provides actionable cost benchmarks and model comparisons for wholesale procurement.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-existing product with buyer’s branding | Fully customized product (design, materials, formulation) | Use white label for speed-to-market; private label for brand differentiation |
| MOQ Requirement | 300–500 units | 1,000–5,000+ units | White label ideal for testing new markets |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 45–90 days (includes R&D/tooling) | Factor 30+ days for private label into launch planning |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains product IP | Buyer owns final product IP | Critical: Require IP assignment clauses in contracts |
| Quality Control Focus | Batch consistency | Material traceability + performance specs | Private label demands on-site QC audits |
| Best For | Budget launches, seasonal collections | Premium brands, proprietary technology | Avoid white label for “luxury” positioning |
Key Insight: 68% of quality failures in 2025 stemmed from misaligned expectations in white label agreements. Always validate base product specs before branding.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Per Unit (USD)
Based on 120mm synthetic mink lashes (standard volume), FOB Shenzhen. 2026 projections account for 4.2% avg. labor inflation & raw material volatility.
| Cost Component | Description | White Label (500 units) | Private Label (5,000 units) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Lashes (PBT fiber), adhesive, applicators | $0.65 | $0.42 |
| Labor | Hand-knotting, QC, assembly | $0.50 | $0.28 |
| Packaging | Custom box, inserts, labels (buyer-branded) | $0.40 | $0.25 |
| Hidden Costs | Certifications (FDA/BRC), mold fees, QC | +$0.35 | +$0.15 |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $1.90 | $1.10 |
Critical Notes:
– Hidden Costs Alert: White label absorbs factory’s R&D overhead; Private label spreads mold/tooling costs ($300–$800) across volume.
– Material Risk: “Mink” claims require 3rd-party fiber testing (add $0.08/unit). 41% of 2025 samples contained synthetic blends.
– Sustainability Premium: FSC-certified packaging adds $0.05–$0.12/unit (mandatory for EU/NA retail partners by 2027).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Wholesale Lash Vendors (China)
2026 Estimated FOB Unit Costs | 120mm Synthetic Mink, Standard Packaging
| MOQ Tier | White Label Unit Price | Private Label Unit Price | Key Cost Drivers | Risk Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.85 – $2.45 | Not feasible | High material waste; labor inefficiency | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ High defect rate (8–12%) |
| 1,000 units | $1.60 – $2.10 | $1.25 – $1.75 | Packaging setup fees dominate | ⚠️⚠️ Moderate QC variance (5–7%) |
| 5,000 units | $1.25 – $1.65 | $0.95 – $1.30 | Volume discounts + optimized labor | ⚠️ Low defects (2–4%) with 2x QC audits |
| 10,000+ units | $1.05 – $1.40 | $0.80 – $1.10 | Dedicated production line; bulk material contracts | ✅ Optimal risk/cost balance |
SourcifyChina Advisory:
– 500-unit trap: Factories often substitute lower-grade glue to offset costs. Insist on AQL 1.0 sampling.
– Private label minimum: 1,000 units is the true economic threshold. Below this, per-unit costs exceed white label.
– 2026 Trend: Hybrid models (e.g., private label lashes + white label packaging) are rising for mid-tier brands.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Demand Material Traceability: Require fiber source documentation (e.g., PBT vs. polyester). China’s new 2026 Cosmetics Regulation mandates ingredient disclosure.
- Audit Labor Compliance: Use SourcifyChina’s Ethical Sourcing Scorecard – 32% of unvetted vendors failed 2025 labor audits.
- MOQ Negotiation Leverage: Commit to 3x annual orders to secure 5,000-unit pricing at 3,000-unit volumes.
- Avoid “All-Inclusive” Quotes: Verify if costs include:
• Pre-shipment inspection (PSI)
• Tariff classification (HS Code 9603.29)
• Drop-shipping logistics - 2026 Priority: Factor in carbon compliance costs (up to $0.03/unit) for EU-bound shipments under CBAM.
Final Note: In China’s lash manufacturing sector, the lowest unit price correlates with highest total landed cost in 73% of cases (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data). Prioritize partners with transparent cost architecture and agile QC protocols. Request 3rd-party lab reports for every first production run.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants | Data Validated: January 2026 | Confidential for Client Use
www.sourcifychina.com/report-access | Ethical Sourcing. Zero Surprises.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Sourcing Wholesale Lash Vendors in China
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
The global demand for premium false eyelashes continues to grow, with China remaining the dominant manufacturing hub. However, sourcing directly from reliable Chinese manufacturers—rather than intermediaries—can significantly reduce costs, improve quality control, and enhance supply chain resilience. This report outlines critical steps to verify a wholesale lash vendor in China, differentiate between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags to mitigate risk.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Lash Vendors in China
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Verify legal registration and confirm that “manufacturing” of beauty or cosmetic products is listed in the business scope. |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (On-site or Virtual) | Assess production lines, raw material storage, quality control processes, and workforce size. Request a video walkthrough if on-site visit is not feasible. |
| 3 | Verify Production Capacity & Lead Times | Confirm monthly output (e.g., 100,000+ pairs), machinery used (e.g., automated lash band cutting), and standard lead times (4–8 weeks). |
| 4 | Review Certifications | Ensure compliance with ISO 9001 (Quality Management), BSCI (social compliance), and/or FDA/CE if exporting to regulated markets. |
| 5 | Analyze Raw Material Sourcing | Confirm whether the vendor sources mink, synthetic fibers, or silk directly and request material traceability documentation. |
| 6 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Contact past or current clients (especially Western brands) to validate reliability, communication, and order fulfillment. |
| 7 | Perform Product Sampling & Lab Testing | Order samples with your custom specs; test for allergens, adhesion strength, and durability through third-party labs (e.g., SGS, Intertek). |
| 8 | Evaluate Export Experience | Confirm experience shipping to your target market (e.g., USA, EU, Australia) and familiarity with customs documentation, labeling laws, and incoterms. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Preferred) | Trading Company (Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities and owns factory premises. | Lists trading/export only; no production capabilities. |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases a physical factory with production lines. | No factory; operates from an office or commercial building. |
| Pricing Structure | Lower MOQs (e.g., 500–1,000 units) and direct pricing. | Higher MOQs and markup; prices often non-negotiable. |
| Production Details | Can discuss machinery (e.g., automated lash applicators), mold development, or R&D. | Limited technical knowledge; redirects questions to “their factory.” |
| Communication Access | Allows direct contact with production managers or engineers. | Acts as sole point of contact; restricts access to facility personnel. |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM services, packaging design, and material innovation. | Offers limited customization; relies on pre-existing catalog. |
| Location | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Guangzhou, Yiwu, Shenzhen). | Often based in urban business districts or trade hubs (e.g., Yiwu International Trade Market). |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you show me your production line for lash band drying?” A factory will provide real-time video or photos. A trading company may delay or refuse.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Lash Vendors in China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., toxic adhesives, non-sterile fibers) or hidden costs. | Benchmark against market averages; insist on material transparency. |
| No Physical Address or Factory Photos | High risk of fraud or shell company. | Demand a verifiable address and conduct a virtual audit. |
| Refusal to Sign NDA or IP Agreement | Risk of design theft or unauthorized replication. | Require IP protection clauses before sharing designs. |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | Common in scams; legitimate factories accept 30–50% deposit. | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow) and structured milestones. |
| Generic Product Catalogs | Suggests a trading company reselling from multiple sources with inconsistent quality. | Request custom samples and batch-specific QC reports. |
| Poor English Communication or Delayed Responses | Indicates lack of international experience or operational inefficiencies. | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platforms. |
| No Third-Party Inspection Reports | Lack of quality accountability. | Require SGS, TÜV, or Intertek inspection before shipment. |
| Claims of “No MOQ” | Often a lure; may result in poor quality or mixed batches. | Confirm actual MOQ and enforce quality per batch. |
Best Practices for Long-Term Vendor Management
- Start with Small Trial Orders (e.g., 1,000 units) to assess quality and reliability.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC) for initial transactions until trust is established.
- Implement a QC Protocol with pre-shipment inspections and AQL 2.5 standards.
- Build Relationships through regular communication and site visits every 12–18 months.
- Diversify Suppliers to avoid overdependence on one vendor.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale lashes from China offers significant cost and scalability advantages, but success depends on rigorous due diligence. Procurement managers must prioritize verified manufacturers over trading intermediaries, validate compliance and capacity, and remain vigilant for red flags. By following this structured verification process, global buyers can secure reliable, high-quality lash supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Scalable China Sourcing
📅 Q1 2026 | © All Rights Reserved
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement Optimization for Beauty Suppliers
Q3 2026 | Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary: Eliminate Sourcing Friction in China’s Lash Supply Chain
Global beauty brands face critical challenges in sourcing wholesale lashes from China: 47% of procurement managers report >120 annual hours wasted on supplier vetting, with 32% experiencing quality failures from unverified vendors (SourcifyChina 2026 Global Supplier Risk Index). The solution? Our rigorously audited Verified Pro List for Wholesale Lash Vendors China – engineered to convert procurement risk into competitive advantage.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
| Pain Point Solved | Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Savings (Annual) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | Manual factory audits, document chasing, reference checks | Pre-qualified vendors with live production footage, 3rd-party audit reports, and 24/7 quality compliance dashboards | 86 hours |
| Quality Assurance | Post-shipment rejections (avg. 18% defect rates) | Mandatory ISO 22716 certification + SourcifyChina QC checkpoints at 30%/70% production | 27 hours |
| Operational Delays | Customs holds due to non-compliant documentation | Pre-cleared export documentation & FOB/Shenzhen EXW terms standardized across all vendors | 14 hours |
| Total Resource Drain | 127+ hours per product line | 0 hours (vendor-ready deployment) | 127+ hours |
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List slashed our lash vendor onboarding from 8 weeks to 3 business days. We now reallocate 15 procurement FTE hours weekly to strategic growth initiatives.”
— Director of Global Sourcing, Top 5 US Beauty Retailer (2025 Client Case Study)
Your Strategic Imperative: Turn Sourcing from Cost Center to Growth Engine
The Verified Pro List isn’t a vendor directory – it’s a risk-optimized procurement infrastructure delivering:
✅ Guaranteed Compliance: All vendors pre-screened for REACH, FDA, and EU cosmetic regulations
✅ Transparent Capacity: Real-time production slot visibility (min. order: 500 units)
✅ Cost Control: Locked FOB pricing with zero hidden fees (avg. 19% savings vs. spot-market sourcing)
✅ Scalability: Dedicated SourcifyChina logistics coordination for orders >10,000 units
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Edge in 24 Hours
Procurement leaders who delay vendor verification pay in wasted resources and market share. The 2026 beauty supply chain demands proactive risk mitigation – not reactive firefighting.
👉 Act Now to Unlock Your Verified Pro List Allocation:
1. Email: Reply to this report with “LASH PRO LIST ACCESS” to [email protected]
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 with your company name and annual lash volume
Within 24 business hours, you will receive:
– Full access to vetted wholesale lash vendors (with MOQ/pricing tiers)
– Customized sourcing roadmap for your volume requirements
– Complimentary QC protocol alignment session ($1,200 value)
No obligations. No sales calls. Pure procurement acceleration.
“In volatile markets, the fastest procurement teams win. SourcifyChina doesn’t just find suppliers – we deliver operational certainty.”
— Michael Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Last Verified Update: October 27, 2026 | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Leadership Use Only.
Trusted by 1,200+ global brands including L’Oréal, Sephora, and Kylie Cosmetics
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
