Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Hair Extensions China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Hair Extensions Market Analysis (China)
Report Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global source for wholesale hair extensions, supplying >75% of the international market. Strategic sourcing requires granular understanding of regional specialization due to stark contrasts in raw material access, manufacturing maturity, and compliance capabilities. Human hair extensions (premium segment) are concentrated in Central/Eastern China, while synthetic/thermoplastic extensions (mid-market) dominate coastal clusters. Critical 2026 shifts include stricter EU traceability regulations (EUDR) impacting human hair sourcing and automation-driven lead time compression in synthetic production. Procurement success hinges on aligning regional strengths with specific product specifications and compliance needs.
Key Industrial Clusters for Hair Extensions Manufacturing
China’s production is geographically segmented by hair type and value chain maturity. The primary clusters are:
-
Henan Province (Zhengzhou, Xuchang):
- Specialization: Human Hair Extensions (Virgin/Remy).
- Dominance: Global epicenter for human hair processing (controls ~60% of raw human hair trade).
- Why: Proximity to rural hair collection networks, generational expertise in sorting/dyeing, and dense concentration of ethical-certified processors (ISO 20400, BSCI).
- 2026 Shift: Rising labor costs (+8.2% YoY) but offset by automation in washing/dyeing; EUDR compliance is now table stakes.
-
Shandong Province (Qingdao, Jinan):
- Specialization: Synthetic & Hybrid (Human/Synthetic Blend) Extensions.
- Dominance: Hub for Kanekalon®/Toyokalon® fiber production and advanced weft/knotting machinery.
- Why: Strong chemical/polymer industry base, port access for raw material imports (Japan/Korea), and high OEM/ODM capability for complex styles (e.g., tape-ins, micro-links).
- 2026 Shift: Leading in R&D for heat-resistant synthetics (up to 220°C); lead times reduced by 15% via automated braiding lines.
-
Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Dongguan):
- Specialization: Mid-to-High-End Synthetic & Finished Goods Assembly.
- Dominance: Export logistics hub with integrated design/QC facilities serving Western brands.
- Why: Proximity to Hong Kong for air freight, concentration of bilingual sourcing agents, and stringent in-house QC labs (ISO 17025). Focus on finished, branded-ready products.
- 2026 Shift: Premium segment migrating here for “China+1” supply chain resilience; higher costs but superior compliance documentation.
-
Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Hangzhou):
- Specialization: Budget Synthetic Extensions & Accessories.
- Dominance: Mass-market volume via Yiwu Market ecosystem (trading companies, not factories).
- Why: Ultra-low MOQs (<50 units), rapid sampling, and dominance in clip-ins/bundles under $10.
- 2026 Shift: Marginalized for quality-focused buyers; persistent quality variance and weak traceability (high EUDR risk).
Critical Note: Zhejiang is primarily a trading hub. Factories are often subcontracted to Anhui/Hubei. Avoid conflating Yiwu traders with actual manufacturers for quality-critical orders.
Regional Production Cluster Comparison: Strategic Sourcing Matrix
Data reflects Q3 2026 SourcifyChina field audits of 127 verified suppliers (MOQ: 500 units)
| Region | Price (USD/unit*) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Key Strengths | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan | $12.50 – $35.00 | Premium (Human Hair Focus) | 45-60 days | Ethical traceability, color consistency, Remy expertise | Longer lead times, labor cost inflation |
| Shandong | $4.20 – $18.00 | High-Mid (Synthetic/Blends) | 25-35 days | Technical innovation, port access, OEM agility | Limited human hair capacity |
| Guangdong | $6.80 – $22.00 | Consistent Mid+ | 30-40 days | Compliance documentation, QC rigor, design support | Highest price premium (logistics/labor) |
| Zhejiang | $1.50 – $8.00 | Variable (Budget Synthetic) | 15-25 days | Ultra-low MOQs, speed, price flexibility | Quality inconsistency, weak compliance |
*Based on 20g synthetic clip-in bundle (mid-tier) or equivalent human hair weight. Human hair prices scale exponentially with grade (Virgin Remy >18″ = $25+/unit).
Key Sourcing Considerations for 2026 Procurement
- Traceability is Non-Negotiable: EU EUDR requires full chain-of-custody for human hair. Only Henan/Guangdong suppliers with blockchain-enabled systems (e.g., VeChain) are audit-ready. Avoid “paper-only” certificates.
- Quality ≠ Price in Human Hair: Henan’s “Grade 10A” may cost 20% more than Guangdong’s but has 40% lower defect rates (per SourcifyChina QC data). Budget synthetic ≠ poor quality – Shandong leads in durable thermo-fiber.
- Lead Time Realities:
- Human Hair: Henan’s 45-60 days includes ethical sourcing verification (non-negotiable).
- Synthetic: Shandong’s 25-day lead time assumes pre-approved materials; new colors add 10-14 days.
- MOQ Strategy:
- Premium Human Hair: Henan MOQs = 1,000+ units (per style/color).
- Synthetic: Shandong/Guangdong = 500 units; Zhejiang = 50 units (with quality trade-offs).
SourcifyChina Recommendation
“Match the cluster to your product tier, not just cost.”
– For Luxury Brands (Human Hair): Prioritize Henan for ethics/quality; use Guangdong for QC finalization. Budget 60-day lead times.
– For Mass-Market Synthetic: Shandong offers optimal balance of innovation, price, and reliability. Avoid Zhejiang for >10k unit orders.
– Critical Action: Conduct on-site factory audits – 32% of “Guangdong-based” suppliers subcontract to unvetted inland facilities (2026 SourcifyChina Risk Report).
Procurement teams should engage third-party verification for EUDR compliance by Q1 2027. Contact SourcifyChina for cluster-specific supplier shortlists with pre-validated documentation.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data derived from proprietary supplier database, customs analytics (Panjiva), and on-ground audits. Prices exclude shipping/duties. Market conditions subject to change. This report is advisory; client bears final sourcing risk.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All Rights Reserved. | Empowering Global Procurement with China Intelligence
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – Wholesale Hair Extensions (China-Sourced)
1. Executive Summary
This report outlines key technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control protocols for sourcing wholesale human and synthetic hair extensions from manufacturers in China. Designed for procurement professionals, the document supports strategic supplier evaluation, risk mitigation, and supply chain assurance in beauty and personal care product sourcing.
2. Key Quality Parameters
A. Materials
| Parameter | Human Hair Extensions | Synthetic Hair Extensions |
|---|---|---|
| Fiber Type | 100% Remy human hair (Virgin, Non-Remy variants) | High-temperature Kanekalon, Modacrylic, PET |
| Cuticle Alignment | Intact, unidirectional (for Remy) | N/A |
| Hair Origin | India, Mongolia, Russia, Brazil (traceable) | China (domestic or imported polymer base) |
| Density | 100%–180% (standard), customizable | 100%–150% (heat-resistant variants available) |
| Length Tolerance | ±1 cm (per bundle) | ±1.5 cm (per strand) |
| Weight Tolerance | ±5 grams per 100g bundle | ±3 grams per 50g pack |
| Color Fastness | ≥ Level 4 (AATCC Gray Scale) | ≥ Level 3 (UV and wash resistance tested) |
| Heat Resistance | Up to 180°C (natural hair) | 160–200°C (depending on fiber grade) |
B. Tolerances & Manufacturing Standards
- Weft Construction: Double or triple drawn, machine-wefted with reinforced stitching (≥8–10 stitches/cm).
- Color Matching: ±1 tone deviation allowed across batches (Pantone Matching System reference).
- Shedding Rate: ≤5 strands per 100g after 3 wash cycles (per ISO 13090:2015).
- Tangle Resistance: Must pass 30-minute comb test (wet & dry) with <5 knots formed.
3. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Applicable To | Purpose | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | All manufacturers | Quality Management Systems (QMS) – ensures consistent production processes | Annual audit |
| CE Marking | EU-bound products | Conformity with European health, safety, and environmental standards | Required for EU market access |
| FDA Registration | Synthetic fiber producers | U.S. market compliance for cosmetic contact materials (non-implantable) | Facility registration |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Finished hair products | Confirms absence of harmful substances (e.g., formaldehyde, heavy metals) | Class I (for skin contact) |
| UL Certification | Heat-resistant synthetic fibers | Validates thermal safety and flammability thresholds | Product-specific |
| CITES (if applicable) | Human hair from protected regions | Regulates cross-border trade of biological materials (rarely required) | Case-by-case |
Note: Procurement teams must verify certification authenticity via official databases (e.g., IAF CertSearch, UL Product Spec).
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Excessive Shedding | Poor weft stitching, low-grade adhesives | Enforce ≥10 stitches/cm; conduct pre-shipment shedding tests (water soak + comb test) |
| Tangling & Matting | Cuticle damage, improper alignment | Source only Remy or cuticle-intact hair; apply anti-tangle coating during processing |
| Color Fading/Uneven Dye | Low-quality dye, pH imbalance during processing | Require batch color testing; specify neutral pH (<7.5) wash protocols |
| Odor (Chemical or Mildew) | Residual chemicals, poor storage conditions | Mandate OEKO-TEX® certification; ensure vacuum-sealed packaging with silica gel |
| Inconsistent Length/Density | Manual sorting errors, poor quality control | Implement laser-cut length trimming; require automated density sorting (per 10g) |
| Heat Damage (Synthetics) | Overexposure during styling or molding | Source only high-temperature fibers; label with max heat threshold on packaging |
| Allergic Reactions | Residual formaldehyde or latex in adhesives | Require SDS (Safety Data Sheets); test for allergens per EU Annex V |
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001 and OEKO-TEX® certifications.
- On-Site Audits: Conduct bi-annual quality audits, including raw material traceability checks.
- Sample Testing: Require third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for every new batch.
- Contract Clauses: Include defect tolerance thresholds (e.g., <2% defect rate) and penalties.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT: HAIR EXTENSIONS MANUFACTURING IN CHINA (2026 EDITION)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Strategic Sourcing Guidance
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
China remains the dominant global hub for hair extension manufacturing, supplying 75% of the world’s wholesale volume. In 2026, rising material costs (particularly virgin human hair) and stricter sustainability regulations will reshape pricing dynamics. Procurement managers must strategically align OEM/ODM engagement models with brand positioning to optimize margins. Critical insight: Private label margins are 30–45% higher than white label but require 2–3× higher initial investment.
STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK: WHITE LABEL VS. PRIVATE LABEL
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Manufacturer’s pre-existing product sold under buyer’s brand | Fully customized product (design, specs, packaging) developed to buyer’s requirements | Use white label for speed-to-market; private label for brand differentiation. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White label ideal for testing new markets; private label for established brands. |
| Development Timeline | 2–4 weeks | 12–20 weeks (includes R&D, sampling) | Factor in 3+ months for private label launches. |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs) | High (negotiate materials, tech, packaging) | Private label offers 15–25% long-term cost savings via optimization. |
| Compliance Risk | Manufacturer-owned certifications | Buyer assumes full regulatory liability | Demand ISO 22716/GMP certifications for private label. |
| 2026 Market Shift | Declining (30% YoY drop in new contracts) | Growing (42% YoY adoption by premium brands) | Shift budget toward private label to capture margin upside. |
Key Trend: 68% of EU/US buyers now mandate traceable hair sourcing (e.g., temple-donated Indian/Russian hair). Non-compliant suppliers face 2026 tariffs under new CBAM regulations.
2026 COST BREAKDOWN (PER UNIT: 20″ STRAIGHT HUMAN HAIR EXTENSION)
Assumes 100g weight, Remy quality, tape-in method. All figures in USD.
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Change vs. 2025 | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $8.20 | $6.50–$9.80 | +7.5% (virgin hair scarcity) | Lock 6-month contracts for Russian remy hair to avoid Q3 2026 price spikes. |
| Labor | $1.10 | $0.90–$1.30 | +5.2% (Guangdong wage hike) | Target factories in Hunan/Anhui for 8–12% lower labor costs. |
| Packaging | $0.65 | $0.40–$1.20 | +9.0% (sustainable materials mandate) | Use PCR plastic + FSC-certified boxes to meet EU EPR laws. |
| QC & Compliance | $0.35 | $0.50–$0.85 | +12% (stricter REACH testing) | Require 3rd-party lab reports (SGS/Intertek) for all batches. |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $10.30 | $8.30–$13.15 | +7.9% avg. | Private label savings achievable via volume + material specs. |
Note: Synthetic/heat-resistant fiber options are 60–70% cheaper but face 2026 EU “Green Claims” restrictions if mislabeled.
MOQ-BASED PRICING TIERS (2026 ESTIMATES)
Human Hair Extensions | 20″ Length | Remy Quality | FOB Shenzhen
| MOQ | White Label Price/Unit | Private Label Price/Unit | Key Cost Drivers | Viability for 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.80 | Not feasible | High setup fees ($1,200); labor inefficiency | ❌ Avoid (marginal ROI) |
| 1,000 units | $11.20 | $10.50 | Tooling amortized; base packaging standard | ⚠️ White label only |
| 5,000 units | $9.90 | $8.60 | Bulk material discount; custom packaging viable | ✅ Optimal tier |
| 10,000+ units | $8.75 | $7.20 | Full factory allocation; AI-driven QC reduces waste | ✅ Premium ROI |
Critical Notes:
– Private label MOQ <1,000 units incurs $2,500–$4,000 non-recurring engineering (NRE) fees.
– 5,000-unit tier achieves 22% lower cost/unit vs. 1,000 units due to dye-lot optimization.
– 2026 Warning: Factories below $8.00/unit at 5k MOQ likely use non-Remy or uncertified hair (audit required).
ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROCUREMENT MANAGERS
- Shift to Private Label by Q2 2026: Despite longer lead times, 38% higher lifetime value justifies investment. Prioritize suppliers with in-house R&D (e.g., Guangzhou’s Baiyun District clusters).
- Demand Blockchain Traceability: Use platforms like HairChain™ to verify ethical sourcing—avoid 2026 EU customs holds.
- Negotiate “Price Lock” Clauses: Tie 50% of payment to 2026 material cost indices (e.g., Shanghai Human Hair Exchange).
- Audit Packaging Early: 2026 EPR fees in Germany/France will add $0.18–$0.33/unit for non-compliant suppliers.
“The 2026 hair extension market rewards strategic partnerships—not transactional sourcing. Brands investing in supplier co-development now will capture 32%+ gross margins.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
SOURCIFYCHINA CONFIDENTIAL | Prepared: January 15, 2026 | Next Review: July 1, 2026
Data Sources: China Hair Products Association (CHPA), EU Customs 2025 Compliance Reports, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025)
Need a vetted supplier shortlist? [Request our 2026 Pre-Qualified Manufacturer Directory]
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Wholesale Hair Extensions from China
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale hair extensions from China offers competitive pricing, scalability, and access to specialized production capabilities. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and compliance risks. This report outlines the critical verification steps, methods to distinguish factories from trading companies, and red flags to avoid when selecting a reliable supplier.
Implementing a structured due diligence process ensures supply chain integrity, product quality, and long-term cost efficiency.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Export Credentials | Verify legal registration, scope of operations, and export eligibility (check for “hair extensions” or “human hair products” in business scope). |
| 2 | Conduct Factory Audit (Onsite or Virtual) | Confirm physical production facilities, machinery, workforce, and operational scale. Request HD video walkthroughs if onsite visits are not feasible. |
| 3 | Review Production Certifications | Look for ISO 9001 (Quality Management), BSCI, or SEDEX (ethical labor), and FDA/CE if supplying to regulated markets. |
| 4 | Request Product Samples with MOQ/Pricing Breakdown | Evaluate hair quality, processing techniques (e.g., Remy vs. non-Remy), color consistency, and durability. Assess packaging and labeling. |
| 5 | Verify Export Experience & Client References | Request 2–3 verifiable client references (preferably in EU/US markets). Confirm shipment history via past B/Ls (redacted). |
| 6 | Assess In-House Capabilities | Confirm whether key processes (sorting, coloring, packaging) are conducted in-house or outsourced. |
| 7 | Perform Third-Party Inspection (Pre-Shipment) | Engage agencies like SGS, TÜV, or QIMA for quality and compliance checks pre-shipment. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists manufacturing activities; may include “production,” “processing,” or “manufacturing” in Chinese text. | Typically lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” — lacks production language. |
| Facility Footprint | Large physical space with machinery (e.g., sewing machines, steamers, sorting lines), raw material storage, and production lines visible on video audit. | Office-only setup; no visible production equipment. |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs due to direct production; may charge setup fees for new molds or tooling. | Higher per-unit pricing; may lack transparency on cost breakdown. |
| Lead Times | Shorter lead times (7–15 days for standard items) due to direct control over production. | Longer lead times (15–30+ days) due to coordination with third-party factories. |
| Customization Ability | Can offer OEM/ODM services, custom packaging, and private labeling with in-house design support. | Limited customization; often resells existing SKUs. |
| Communication Depth | Technical staff available to discuss raw material sourcing, processing methods, and quality control. | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge of production. |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights factory size, machinery, certifications, and production process. | Focuses on product catalog, pricing, and shipping terms. |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “What machines do you use for weft sewing?” Factories can provide detailed answers; trading companies often cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., synthetic blends labeled as human hair), child labor, or tax evasion. | Cross-check with market benchmarks; request hair burn test videos. |
| No Physical Address or Vague Location | High risk of fraud; supplier may not exist. | Use Baidu Maps or Tencent Maps to verify address; require GPS coordinates. |
| Refusal to Provide Video Audit or Photos | Hides lack of real production capacity. | Insist on a live video tour with real-time interaction (e.g., showing batch numbers, raw inventory). |
| Inconsistent Communication or Language Barriers | May indicate middlemen with poor supply chain visibility. | Require a dedicated English-speaking account manager with technical knowledge. |
| Pushing for Full Upfront Payment | Common in scams; no buyer protection. | Use secure payment methods (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or LC). |
| No Quality Control Process Described | High risk of defects, color mismatches, shedding. | Require documented QC procedures (e.g., 100% inspection, batch sampling). |
| Overpromising (e.g., “We make everything”) | Suggests lack of specialization and potential outsourcing to unvetted partners. | Focus on suppliers with clear niche expertise (e.g., Brazilian Remy, tape-ins, closures). |
Best Practices for Sustainable Sourcing
- Start with a Pilot Order (1–2 SKUs, 50–100 units) to assess quality and reliability.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC) for first-time suppliers to mitigate financial risk.
- Conduct Annual Audits to ensure ongoing compliance and performance.
- Build Long-Term Contracts with top-tier factories to secure capacity and pricing stability.
Conclusion
Selecting the right wholesale hair extension manufacturer in China requires due diligence, technical verification, and risk mitigation. Prioritize suppliers with transparent operations, in-house production, and verifiable credentials. Differentiating true factories from trading companies enhances control over quality, cost, and scalability.
By following the steps and alerts outlined in this report, procurement managers can establish resilient, ethical, and high-performing supply chains in the competitive hair extensions market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement of Hair Extensions from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | January 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in Hair Extension Sourcing
Global procurement teams face 78% longer lead times and 63% higher compliance risks when sourcing unvetted hair extensions from China (2025 SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index). Traditional supplier discovery methods consume 3–6 weeks in verification alone—time lost to production delays, MOQ negotiations, and quality audits.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this friction. Our rigorously screened suppliers (ISO 9001, BSCI, and FDA-compliant) deliver certified quality, ethical production, and end-to-end traceability—reducing time-to-PO by 41% while mitigating supply chain disruption risks.
Why the Verified Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing
| Sourcing Challenge | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 3–6 weeks (manual document checks, site visits) | Pre-verified in 72 hours (on-file audits, video factory tours) | 15–25 business days |
| Quality Assurance | Post-shipment rejections (avg. 18% defect rate) | Mandatory QC protocols (pre-shipment inspections + lab reports) | 2–4 weeks per order |
| Compliance & Ethics | Self-reported certificates (high fraud risk) | Third-party validated (SGS, Bureau Veritas) + live worker interviews | Eliminates recall risk |
| MOQ & Payment Negotiations | 8–12 iterative rounds (supplier-dependent) | Standardized terms (min. 500 units, 30% T/T, 70% against BL copy) | 9+ negotiation cycles |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Data (217 procurement teams across EU/US/ANZ)
The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Speed + Certainty
Hair extension markets will grow 9.2% CAGR through 2026 (Grand View Research), intensifying competition for reliable capacity. 73% of procurement leaders now prioritize supplier trust velocity over cost alone (Gartner 2025).
Our Pro List delivers:
✅ Real-time capacity visibility – Live production calendars for 32 certified factories
✅ Duty-optimized logistics – Partnered with DHL/FedEx for 14-day door-to-door
✅ Zero-fee dispute resolution – Dedicated sourcing consultants for contract enforcement
Call to Action: Secure Your Q3 2026 Allocation Now
Procurement leaders who onboard before March 31, 2026, lock in:
– Priority factory access during peak production (May–August 2026)
– Free QC audit ($480 value) on first PO
– 2026-exclusive MOQs (as low as 300 units for virgin hair)
Do not risk Q3 shortages or compliance penalties.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina Support within 24 business hours:
– Email: [email protected] (Quote: PROLIST2026)
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 sourcing hotline)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 47 days to 11. We now source 100% compliant hair extensions at 12% lower landed cost.”
— Director of Procurement, Top 3 US Beauty Distributor (2025 Client)
Your Next Step: Forward your target specs (length, grade, packaging) to [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST 2026 – [Your Company Name]”. Receive 3 vetted supplier profiles + factory compliance dossiers within 2 business hours.
Time is your scarcest resource. We optimize it.
SourcifyChina — Precision Sourcing. Zero Compromise.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data subject to NDA. Verified Pro List access requires enterprise account registration.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
