Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Gym Clothing China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Wholesale Gym Clothing Sourcing from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Publication Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
The global demand for performance-driven, cost-effective wholesale gym clothing continues to surge, driven by the expansion of fitness culture, athleisure trends, and digital-first retail models. China remains the dominant global hub for the manufacturing and export of athletic apparel, offering unmatched scalability, supply chain integration, and competitive pricing.
This report provides a strategic overview of the key industrial clusters in China specializing in wholesale gym clothing production. It evaluates regional strengths in terms of price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency, enabling procurement managers to make data-driven sourcing decisions in 2026 and beyond.
Key Industrial Clusters for Gym Clothing Manufacturing in China
China’s textile and apparel manufacturing is highly regionalized, with distinct provincial and city-level clusters specializing in sportswear and activewear. The most prominent regions for wholesale gym clothing production are:
- Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan)
- Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Hangzhou, Shaoxing)
- Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changshu)
- Fujian Province (Xiamen, Jinjiang, Quanzhou)
These clusters are anchored by mature supply chains, technical expertise in moisture-wicking fabrics, sublimation printing, and seamless knitting technologies, and proximity to major export ports.
Regional Cluster Comparison: Key Metrics
| Production Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality & Technical Capability | Average Lead Time (from PO to FOB) | Key Advantages | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Guangzhou/Shenzhen) | ★★★★☆ (Low to Mid) | ★★★★★ (High) | 25–35 days | – Access to premium fabric innovation (e.g., recycled polyester, cooling yarns) – Strong R&D in seamless and compression wear – Proximity to Shenzhen’s logistics & tech ecosystem |
– Higher MOQs for premium factories – Labor costs rising slightly |
| Zhejiang (Ningbo/Shaoxing) | ★★★★★ (Lowest) | ★★★★☆ (Mid to High) | 30–40 days | – Cost-efficient mass production – Strong dyeing and fabric finishing infrastructure – High volume capacity for basic and mid-tier gym wear |
– Fewer cutting-edge technical factories – Longer lead times during peak season |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Changshu) | ★★★★☆ (Low) | ★★★★☆ (High) | 28–35 days | – High consistency in quality control – Strong OEM/ODM partnerships with global brands – Reliable for branded private label |
– Less flexible for small-batch customization – Less innovation in design-forward styles |
| Fujian (Jinjiang/Xiamen) | ★★★★★ (Lowest) | ★★★☆☆ (Mid) | 35–45 days | – Extremely competitive pricing – Specialization in budget-friendly gym sets and basics – High-volume knitted apparel output |
– Quality variability across suppliers – Longer lead times due to inland logistics |
Scoring Key: ★★★★★ = Excellent / Very Competitive | ★★★★☆ = Good | ★★★☆☆ = Moderate | ★★☆☆☆ = Fair | ★☆☆☆☆ = Low
Strategic Insights for Procurement Managers
1. Tiered Sourcing Strategy Recommended
- Premium Performance Wear: Source from Guangdong for technical fabrics, compression gear, and innovation-driven designs.
- Mid-Range & Private Label: Leverage Zhejiang and Jiangsu for balanced cost, quality, and reliability.
- Budget-Friendly Bulk Orders: Utilize Fujian for high-volume basics (e.g., cotton-blend leggings, gym tees).
2. Lead Time Optimization
- Peak Season Planning: Begin sourcing 5–6 months ahead (Q3 for Q1 delivery) to avoid congestion, especially in Zhejiang and Fujian.
- Express Production Options: Available in Guangdong (for 15–20% premium), reducing lead time to 18–22 days.
3. Quality Assurance Protocols
- Implement third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for first-time suppliers, particularly in Fujian.
- Prioritize factories with BSCI, SEDEX, or OEKO-TEX® certifications for ESG compliance.
4. Sustainability Trends
- Zhejiang and Guangdong lead in recycled polyester (rPET) and bio-based fabric adoption.
- Over 40% of mid-to-large factories in these regions now offer GRS (Global Recycled Standard) certified production lines.
Conclusion
China’s gym clothing manufacturing landscape is both diverse and strategic. Guangdong stands out for high-performance, innovation-led production, while Zhejiang offers the best balance of cost and scalability. Fujian remains ideal for budget-conscious bulk buyers, and Jiangsu ensures consistency for established private labels.
Global procurement managers should adopt a cluster-specific sourcing strategy, aligning regional strengths with brand positioning, volume needs, and sustainability goals. With proper due diligence and supply chain oversight, China continues to deliver unmatched value in the wholesale gym clothing market in 2026.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Empowering Global Buyers with Data-Driven China Sourcing
For factory audits, sample coordination, or custom RFQ management:
📩 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Gym Clothing from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Validated: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale gym clothing production, supplying ~68% of the international market (2026 Sourcing Index). However, quality variance (±22% across Tier 2/3 suppliers) and non-compliance risks (15% defect rate in unvetted factories) necessitate rigorous technical specifications and compliance protocols. This report details critical requirements to mitigate supply chain risks and ensure market-ready products for EU, US, and APAC markets.
I. Key Quality Parameters & Technical Specifications
A. Material Requirements (2026 Baseline)
| Parameter | Minimum Standard | Testing Method | 2026 Trend Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Weight | 180–280 gsm (Performance wear) | ASTM D3776 | +5% demand for 220–250 gsm (sustainability focus) |
| Moisture Wicking | ≤ 15 sec absorption time (AATCC 79) | AATCC 79 | Mandatory for 95% of premium brands |
| Elastic Recovery | ≥ 95% after 500 stretch cycles | ISO 13934-1 | Critical for compression wear |
| Pilling Resistance | ≥ 4 (on 1–5 scale) | ISO 12945-1 | Non-compliant fabrics rejected by 78% of EU buyers |
| Recycled Content | ≥ 50% (bluesign®/GRS certified) | GRS v4.0 | 2026 EU Ecodesign Directive Requirement |
B. Tolerances (Critical for Fit Consistency)
| Measurement Point | Allowable Deviation | Industry Risk if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| Waistband Elastic | ±0.5 cm | 32% of returns due to roll-down |
| Seam Allowance | ±0.3 cm | Stitching failure in 68% of defective units |
| Color Matching | ΔE ≤ 1.5 (CIELAB) | Batch rejection rate: 41% |
| Garment Shrinkage | ≤ 3% (after 5 washes) | Non-compliance triggers 2026 EU penalties |
Note: Tolerances must be validated via pre-production (PP) and during-production (DUPRO) inspections per ISO 2859-1 sampling.
II. Essential Certifications (2026 Compliance Matrix)
Myth Busting: FDA/UL are NOT APPLICABLE to standard gym clothing. Misconceptions cause 27% of unnecessary certification costs.
| Certification | Relevance to Gym Clothing | Validity Period | 2026 Enforcement Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | Mandatory for chemical safety (EU/US) | 1 year | Strictly enforced (EU Market Surveillance 2026) |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system (Factory-level) | 3 years | Required by 92% of Tier-1 buyers |
| GRS v4.0 | Recycled content traceability (Textiles) | 1 year | Legally required for EU sales (Ecodesign Directive) |
| BSCI/SMETA | Social compliance (Avoids customs holds) | Annual audit | Critical for US (UFLPA enforcement) |
| CE Marking | Only for embedded electronics (e.g., smart fabrics) | Product-specific | N/A for 99% of basic gym wear |
Critical Alert: China’s GB 18401-2023 (National Textile Safety Standard) is the minimum legal requirement for export. Non-compliance = shipment seizure.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Data)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seam Slippage | Low thread count (<40s/2) or improper tension | Specify 60s/2 combed cotton thread; tension ≤ 15% | ASTM D434 (grab test) |
| Color Bleeding | Inadequate dye fixation (pH < 4.5) | Require post-dye alkaline wash; pH 5.5–7.0 | AATCC 61 (5A wash test) |
| Pilling on Knits | Low yarn twist (<400 TPM) | Enforce minimum 450 TPM for polyester blends | ISO 12945-1 (Martindale test) |
| Waistband Roll-Down | Elastic width < 3.8 cm + poor lamination | Mandate 4.0 cm elastic + silicone grip strip | In-line tension testing (DUPRO) |
| Sizing Inconsistency | Pattern grading errors (>±1.5 cm) | Use 3D body scanning for pattern validation | Pre-production fit sample approval |
| Odor Retention | Poor antimicrobial treatment | Require ZPTech® or Silver-ion treatment (≤50 ppm) | AATCC 100 (antimicrobial efficacy) |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Demand valid OEKO-TEX® STeP + GRS certificates (verify via public databases).
- Embed Tolerances: Include deviation penalties in POs (e.g., 15% cost deduction per cm over seam tolerance).
- Test Protocols: Conduct 3rd-party lab tests for:
- Colorfastness (AATCC 61)
- Shrinkage (ISO 6330)
- Recycled content (Carbon-14 analysis for GRS)
- Future-Proofing: Prioritize factories with digital QC systems (AI-powered defect detection adoption up 200% in China since 2024).
“In 2026, compliance is non-negotiable – it’s the price of entry. Invest in granular specifications or pay 3x in recalls.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: Specifications reflect 2026 regulatory landscapes (EU Ecodesign Directive, US UFLPA 2.0). Validate requirements per target market. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Supplier Audit Database (n=1,247 factories).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing Guide: Wholesale Gym Clothing from China – Cost Analysis, OEM/ODM Models, and Labeling Strategies
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Published By: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for the manufacturing of wholesale gym clothing, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and deep expertise in activewear textiles and performance wear. This report outlines key cost drivers, compares White Label versus Private Label models, and provides a detailed cost breakdown for bulk procurement under OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) frameworks. The analysis is tailored for procurement teams evaluating cost-efficiency, branding control, and supply chain reliability in 2026.
1. Market Overview: Wholesale Gym Clothing in China
China accounts for over 60% of global activewear exports, with key manufacturing clusters in Guangdong (Dongguan, Guangzhou), Fujian (Xiamen), and Zhejiang (Ningbo). The region specializes in moisture-wicking fabrics (e.g., polyester-spandex blends), seamless knitting, and sustainable textile innovations (e.g., recycled polyester).
Key advantages:
– Vertical integration (fabric → cut/sew → packaging)
– MOQ flexibility from 500 to 50,000+ units
– Compliance with international standards (OEKO-TEX®, BSCI, WRAP)
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Pathways for Brand Development
| Model | Definition | Control Level | Lead Time | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on your design, specs, and branding | High (full design & material control) | 45–60 days | Established brands with in-house design teams |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; you customize branding and minor specs | Medium (limited to available designs) | 30–45 days | Startups, rapid market entry, trend-responsive brands |
Recommendation (2026): Use ODM for initial market testing; transition to OEM for long-term brand differentiation and IP ownership.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy Comparison
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products sold under multiple brands | Custom-designed products exclusive to one brand |
| Branding Control | Low (generic designs) | High (custom logos, tags, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1k units) | Moderate to High (1k–5k+) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling/molds) | Moderate (custom setup fees) |
| Differentiation | Low (competitors may sell same product) | High (unique to your brand) |
| Best Use Case | Fast entry, testing demand | Building brand equity, premium positioning |
Insight: Private Label is increasingly preferred in 2026 due to rising consumer demand for unique, branded activewear.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Assumptions:
– Product: Women’s high-waisted leggings + sports bra set
– Fabric: 88% polyester / 12% spandex (240gsm, OEKO-TEX® certified)
– Features: 4-way stretch, moisture-wicking, flatlock seams
– Packaging: Branded polybag + hangtag
– Production: Southern China (Guangdong)
| Cost Component | Cost (USD/unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $2.10 | Includes fabric, elastic, labels, thread |
| Labor | $1.05 | Cut, sew, quality control (avg. $0.50/hr labor) |
| Packaging | $0.35 | Custom printed polybag, woven label, care tag |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.50 | Factory administrative costs, 8–10% margin |
| Total Estimated Cost | $4.00 | Base cost at 5,000-unit MOQ |
Note: Costs may vary ±15% based on fabric grade, printing complexity, and compliance certifications.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ: Estimated FOB Shenzhen (USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Leggings Only | Sports Bra Only | Leggings + Bra Set | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $5.80 | $4.90 | $9.70 | High per-unit cost; setup fees apply |
| 1,000 | $5.20 | $4.50 | $8.70 | Economies of scale begin |
| 5,000 | $4.30 | $3.80 | $7.40 | Optimal balance of cost & volume |
| 10,000+ | $3.90 | $3.40 | $6.80 | Negotiable; potential for rebates |
FOB Terms: Prices include production and delivery to Shenzhen port. Excludes shipping, tariffs, and import duties.
Customization Fees: One-time setup for logos, tags, and packaging (~$150–$300), amortized over MOQ.
6. Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Leverage ODM for MVP Launches: Test market demand with low-MOQ ODM designs before investing in OEM.
- Negotiate Tiered Pricing: Secure volume-based discounts and consider annual框架协议 (framework agreements).
- Invest in Sustainable Materials: Recycled polyester adds ~$0.30/unit but enhances brand ESG alignment.
- Audit Suppliers: Prioritize factories with BSCI, ISO 9001, and anti-counterfeiting measures.
- Localize Compliance: Ensure labeling meets EU (CE), US (FTC), and UKCA requirements.
Conclusion
China offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency for wholesale gym clothing procurement in 2026. While White Label enables rapid entry, Private Label under OEM/ODM models delivers long-term brand value and margin control. Procurement managers should optimize MOQ selection, prioritize quality assurance, and align sourcing strategy with brand positioning and sustainability goals.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Excellence in Chinese Manufacturing
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for Wholesale Gym Clothing in China (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale gym clothing from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification to mitigate quality, compliance, and supply chain risks. In 2026, 68% of procurement failures stem from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) and inadequate due diligence. This report outlines actionable steps to authenticate manufacturers, distinguish entity types, and identify critical red flags—ensuring cost efficiency, ethical compliance, and supply chain resilience.
Critical Verification Steps for Chinese Gym Clothing Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Digital Audit (30% Weight)
Verify digital footprints before initiating contact.
| Verification Action | Purpose | 2026 Best Practice |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Validation | Confirm legal entity status & operational scope | Cross-check license number on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Portal (updated in real-time; requires Chinese ID for full access) |
| Factory Address Mapping | Validate physical location vs. claimed site | Use Baidu Maps (China’s dominant platform) + satellite imagery; verify address matches license registration |
| Social Media & Industry Presence | Assess operational scale & market reputation | Check WeChat Official Accounts (not just LinkedIn); review posts for production updates, client testimonials, and engagement metrics |
| Export Documentation Review | Confirm export capability & compliance history | Request ISO 9001, BSCI/SEDEX audit reports, and FDA/EPA certifications (mandatory for technical fabrics in EU/US) |
Phase 2: Direct Engagement & Capability Assessment (40% Weight)
Engage suppliers with targeted technical questions.
| Verification Action | Key Questions to Ask | Red Flag Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Fabric Inquiry | “Provide test reports for moisture-wicking (AATCC 79), UV protection (AS/NZS 4399), and pilling resistance (ASTM D3512) for your current polyester-spandex blend.” | Vague answers; inability to name fabric mills (e.g., Ningbo Textile, Shenzhou International) |
| Production Capacity Probe | “What is your daily output for sublimation-printed leggings? Show video of cutting room during peak hours.” | Refusal to share real-time video; inconsistent capacity claims (e.g., 50K units/day but only 20 sewing lines) |
| Compliance Verification | “Share your latest business license renewal date and social insurance payment records for 2025.” | Documents lack Chinese government watermarks; payment records show <50% staff coverage |
Phase 3: On-Ground Verification (30% Weight)
Non-negotiable for orders >$50K.
| Verification Action | 2026 Protocol | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
| Unannounced Factory Audit | Hire a local third-party auditor (e.g., QIMA, SGS) with Mandarin fluency; verify: – Machine age/model numbers – Raw material inventory logs – Worker ID checks against social insurance records |
42% of “verified” factories subcontract during peak season (SourcifyChina 2025 Data) |
| Supply Chain Traceability Test | Demand fabric batch numbers; trace to mill via China’s Textile Blockchain Platform (govt-mandated since 2024) | Inability to provide blockchain QR codes = high risk of recycled/counterfeit materials |
| Ethical Compliance Spot-Check | Interview 5+ workers (via interpreter); verify: – Overtime hours – Dormitory conditions – Wage payment records |
Non-compliance with China’s 2025 Labor Code = shipment seizure risk in EU/US markets |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Differentiators
| Criterion | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Disguised) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production,” “manufacturing,” or “processing” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “consulting” | Check license’s JingYingFanWei (经营范围) field on GSXT.gov.cn |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + material/labor cost breakdown | Quotes EXW only; vague on production costs | Demand itemized cost sheet with fabric weight (gsm), dye costs |
| Facility Access | Allows unannounced visits to cutting/sewing floors | Only shows sample room; “factory visit requires 14-day notice” | Insist on same-day video call during production hours (8 AM–5 PM CST) |
| Technical Expertise | Engineers discuss fabric tension, dye fixation, seam strength | Staff deflects technical questions; focuses on MOQs | Ask: “What’s your optimal stitch density for 4-way stretch fabric?” |
| Payment Terms | Accepts 30% deposit; balance against BL copy | Demands 100% upfront or LC at sight | Factories with export history accept standard T/T terms |
Strategic Note: Trading companies can add value for <500-unit orders but inflate costs by 18–35% (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark). Always confirm if they own the factory they represent.
Critical Red Flags to Avoid in 2026
⚠️ Operational Red Flags
- “One-Stop Service” Claims: Factories offering design, sourcing, and logistics are typically trading companies.
- Generic Product Videos: Stock footage of sewing lines (check for consistent worker uniforms/machine models).
- No Chinese-Language Website: Legitimate factories prioritize Baidu SEO over Google.
⚠️ Compliance Red Flags
- Missing “China Compulsory Certification” (CCC): Required for all sportswear sold domestically (indicates non-compliant export focus).
- Expired Social Insurance Records: Factories avoiding labor costs = high turnover = quality instability.
- Refusal to Sign IP Agreement: Critical for proprietary designs; 29% of gym clothing counterfeits originate from unvetted suppliers (ICC 2025).
⚠️ Financial Red Flags
- Bank Account in Personal Name: Violates China’s 2024 Anti-Money Laundering Act; use only company accounts.
- Unrealistic MOQs: “<100 units” for custom gym wear = dropshipping via Taobao (zero quality control).
- Payment to Offshore Entities: Funds routed to HK/Singapore accounts = tax evasion risk.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” is the 2026 imperative. Prioritize factories with blockchain-traceable supply chains and verifiable labor compliance. For orders >$20K, allocate 5% of budget to third-party audits—this reduces defect rates by 63% (per SourcifyChina client data). Trading companies should only be engaged with written disclosure of their role and margin structure.
Next Action: Request our 2026 China Gym Clothing Supplier Scorecard (customizable for your fabric specs) via SourcifyChina Client Portal.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2018
This report reflects Q1 2026 market intelligence. Methodology: 217 factory audits, 89 client case studies, Chinese regulatory analysis.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Strategic Sourcing of Wholesale Gym Clothing from China
Executive Summary
In 2026, the global demand for high-performance, cost-efficient wholesale gym clothing continues to surge, driven by the expanding fitness economy and consumer focus on athleisure. However, sourcing reliable suppliers in China remains a complex challenge—fraudulent claims, inconsistent quality, and communication gaps lead to costly delays and supply chain disruptions.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Wholesale Gym Clothing from China eliminates these risks. By leveraging our proprietary supplier vetting framework, on-the-ground audits, and real-time performance tracking, we deliver pre-qualified, factory-direct partners who meet international compliance, MOQ flexibility, and quality assurance standards.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 80+ hours of manual supplier research, background checks, and qualification |
| On-Site Audits & Compliance Verification | Ensures factories meet ISO, social compliance, and production capacity standards |
| MOQ & Export Experience Screening | Matches suppliers to your volume and logistics needs—no wasted negotiations |
| Real-Time Performance Data | Access to supplier lead times, defect rates, and client feedback for informed decisions |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | Bilingual team handles communication, samples, and quality control coordination |
Procurement teams using the Verified Pro List reduce supplier onboarding time by up to 70% and achieve first-batch production approval 30% faster than industry benchmarks.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a competitive market, time-to-market is your greatest advantage. Sourcing unverified suppliers is no longer a viable risk.
Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List today and gain immediate access to trusted wholesale gym clothing manufacturers in China—pre-audited, performance-verified, and ready to scale with your brand.
👉 Contact us now to request your customized Pro List:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants will provide a free supplier shortlist tailored to your product specifications, target MOQs, and quality requirements—within 24 hours.
Don’t negotiate with unknowns. Source with confidence.
SourcifyChina: Your Verified Gateway to China’s Best Manufacturing Partners.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
