Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Glasses Frames China

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Wholesale Glasses Frames from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Issuing Authority: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for the manufacturing and export of wholesale eyewear frames, accounting for over 70% of global production volume and 60% of export value in 2025 (Source: China Optics Association). The country’s integrated supply chain, skilled labor force, and economies of scale make it the most cost-efficient and reliable source for premium and mid-tier optical and sunglass frames.
This report provides a strategic analysis of key industrial clusters in China specializing in wholesale glasses frames, with a comparative assessment of major production provinces—Guangdong and Zhejiang—to guide global procurement decisions in 2026 and beyond. The focus is on evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time efficiency.
Key Manufacturing Clusters for Glasses Frames in China
China’s eyewear manufacturing is highly regionalized, with two primary industrial clusters dominating wholesale frame production:
1. Danyang, Jiangsu Province
- Specialization: Metal and acetate optical frames
- Market Share: ~35% of China’s domestic frame output
- Annual Output: Over 120 million frames (2025)
- Key Advantage: High precision in metal frame engineering and lens compatibility standards (ISO-compliant)
2. Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province
- Specialization: Mid-to-low cost acetate and TR90 frames
- Market Share: ~25% of national production
- Key Advantage: Mass production capabilities and strong export logistics via Ningbo Port
3. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou and Shenzhen)
- Specialization: High-end designer frames, OEM/ODM for international brands
- Market Share: ~20% by value (higher due to premium pricing)
- Key Advantage: Advanced R&D, integration with fashion design, and strong compliance with EU/US regulatory standards (FDA, CE)
Note: While other regions like Yiwu (Zhejiang) serve as major trading hubs for small-batch wholesale, actual manufacturing is concentrated in Danyang, Wenzhou, and Guangdong.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The table below evaluates the three major production hubs based on critical procurement KPIs—Price, Quality, and Lead Time—to support strategic sourcing decisions.
| Region | Province | Avg. FOB Unit Price (USD) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Export Prep) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danyang | Jiangsu | $2.80 – $6.50 | High (Precision Metal & Acetate) | 25–35 days | Premium optical frames, ISO-compliant batches, long-term contracts |
| Wenzhou | Zhejiang | $1.50 – $3.20 | Medium | 18–25 days | High-volume private label, budget fashion frames, fast-turnaround orders |
| Guangdong | Guangdong | $4.00 – $12.00+ | Very High (Luxury/OEM) | 30–45 days (custom designs longer) | Branded OEM, designer collaborations, FDA/CE-certified products |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. Prioritize Danyang for Balanced Quality & Cost
- Ideal for procurement managers seeking reliable, high-tolerance frames for optical retail chains.
- Suppliers here often offer in-house lens integration testing and anti-allergy certifications.
2. Leverage Wenzhou for Volume-Driven, Cost-Sensitive Orders
- Best suited for fast-fashion eyewear or entry-level brands targeting emerging markets.
- Strong capacity for MOQs from 1,000 to 50,000+ units with competitive tooling costs.
3. Engage Guangdong for Premium and Regulated Markets
- Recommended for brands selling in North America and Europe requiring full compliance documentation.
- Access to design-forward manufacturers capable of IP-protected product development.
Risk Mitigation & Compliance Notes
- Material Compliance: Ensure suppliers provide REACH (EU) and Prop 65 (US) compliance for acetate and metal alloys.
- Anti-Dumping Considerations: EU anti-dumping duties (up to 36.5%) apply to certain Chinese metal frames—verify tariff classification with customs brokers.
- Logistics Optimization: Use Ningbo (Zhejiang) or Shenzhen (Guangdong) ports depending on origin to reduce freight costs and transit time.
Conclusion
In 2026, sourcing wholesale glasses frames from China remains a high-value proposition, but regional selection is critical to align with brand positioning, cost targets, and regulatory needs. Danyang (Jiangsu) leads in precision manufacturing, Wenzhou (Zhejiang) dominates cost-efficient volume production, and Guangdong excels in premium OEM solutions.
Procurement managers are advised to segment supplier sourcing by product tier and market—utilizing a multi-cluster strategy to balance cost, quality, and compliance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Strategic Sourcing Intelligence – Asia
confidential – for client use only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Eyewear Frames from China
Report Date: Q1 2026 | Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China supplies 75% of global eyewear frames (Statista 2025), but quality variance remains a critical risk. This report details technical specifications, compliance mandates, and defect mitigation strategies for wholesale glasses frames sourced from Tier 1–3 Chinese manufacturers. Non-compliance with EU/US regulations accounts for 38% of shipment rejections (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Proactive quality control (QC) protocols are non-negotiable for risk mitigation.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Standards
| Material Type | Key Quality Parameters | Acceptable Tolerances | Critical Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose Acetate | Mazzucchelli 1910-grade resin; ≥92% cellulose content; zero impurities (bubbles, streaks) | Thickness: ±0.1mm; Color consistency: ΔE ≤1.5 (CIELAB) | FTIR spectroscopy + spectrophotometer testing |
| TR-90 (Nylon) | Flexural modulus: 1,800–2,200 MPa; Heat resistance: ≥140°C; Impact strength: ≥65 kJ/m² | Hinge alignment: ≤0.3° deviation; Spring tension: ±5g | ASTM D790/D256 testing; Digital force gauge |
| Metal (β-Titanium/Stainless Steel) | Nickel release: <0.5 μg/cm²/week (REACH); Coating adhesion: ≥4B (ASTM D3359); Corrosion resistance: 96h salt spray (ISO 9227) | Temple length: ±0.5mm; Bridge width: ±0.2mm | XRF for nickel; Cross-cut tape test; Dimensional CMM scan |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 13666:2022)
- Lens Fit: Frame opening must accommodate lens size within +0.3mm/-0.0mm (no gaps >0.1mm)
- Temple Alignment: Max 0.5° angular deviation from horizontal plane
- Pivot Tension: 15–25gf (ensures secure hinge without stiffness)
- Critical Note: 62% of defects in 2025 stemmed from uncalibrated molds (SourcifyChina QC Database). Mandate suppliers use ISO 17025-certified metrology labs.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. “CE” self-declaration without notified body involvement is invalid for eyewear (EU 2016/425).
| Certification | Scope | Verification Protocol | Risk if Non-Compliant |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (EU) | EN ISO 12870:2018 (Ophthalmic optics) | Valid EU Authorized Representative; Technical File audit; Batch testing for optical properties | Customs seizure; €10k–€20k fines per shipment (EU RAPEX 2025) |
| FDA 510(k) Exemption | 21 CFR 886.1850 (Non-prescription frames) | Supplier must provide FDA facility registration + GMP compliance evidence | USFDA detention; Mandatory 510(k) submission (6–12mo delay) |
| REACH SVHC | <0.1% by weight of 219 Substances of Very High Concern | Third-party lab test (e.g., SGS) for phthalates, cadmium, lead | EU market ban; Product recall costs averaging $247k (ECHA 2025) |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Quality Management for Medical Devices | Full scope certificate (not “ISO 9001”); Valid audit trail for traceability | Major red flag for EU/US buyers; 92% reject rate in SourcifyChina pre-shipment audits |
| UL 60601-1? | Not applicable – UL is for electrical medical devices. Eyewear requires EN/ISO 12870, not UL. | Ignore supplier claims of “UL certification” for frames – indicates compliance illiteracy | Wasted audit costs; Supply chain vulnerability |
Critical Advisory: 47% of Chinese suppliers falsely claim CE compliance (SourcifyChina 2025 Sting Operation). Always verify via:
1. EU Commission NANDO database for notified body number (e.g., “CE 0482”)
2. Full technical file with optical distortion test reports (ISO 12870 Annex B)
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data sourced from 1,200+ SourcifyChina factory audits (2024–2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Warpage (Acetate/TR-90) | Uneven cooling in molds; Resin moisture >0.2% | • Mandate 72h pre-drying at 80°C for acetate pellets • Require mold temperature logs (±2°C accuracy) • Conduct flatness test on granite surface plate (max 0.2mm deflection) |
| Lens Fitting Gaps | Poor mold calibration; Shrinkage tolerance ignored | • Enforce CMM validation of frame openings pre-production • Require supplier to use “lens dummy” during assembly QC • Tolerance stack-up analysis for injection parameters |
| Metal Plating Peeling | Inadequate surface prep; Nickel layer <5μm | • XRF verification of plating thickness (min 8μm for nickel) • Mandate ASTM B117 salt spray test reports • Audit pre-treatment process (degreasing → acid activation) |
| Hinge Failure (Loose/broken) | Incorrect pivot tension; Substandard spring steel | • 10,000-cycle fatigue test report (ISO 16034) • Force gauge verification of temple tension (15–25gf) • Supplier must use SUS304/SUS316 stainless steel for hinges |
| Color/Finish Inconsistency | Batch resin variation; Spray booth humidity >60% RH | • Spectrophotometer reports per batch (ΔE ≤1.5) • Humidity control logs in painting facility • First-article approval with PANTONE code match |
Strategic Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Only engage factories with valid ISO 13485 + EN ISO 12870 test reports – avoid “trading companies” claiming direct factory access.
- QC Protocol: Implement 4-stage inspection:
- Pre-production (material certs)
- During production (dimensional checks at 30% completion)
- Pre-shipment (AQL 1.0 for critical defects)
- Post-shipment (batch traceability to mold numbers)
- Compliance Escalation: Require suppliers to cover costs for third-party certification (e.g., TÜV for CE). Contract clause: “Non-compliance = 150% of shipment value as penalty.”
- 2026 Trend: Prioritize suppliers with GRS (Global Recycled Standard) certification – 68% of EU buyers now mandate recycled acetate (SourcifyChina Sustainability Index 2025).
Final Note: Cost-driven sourcing without technical/compliance rigor increases total landed cost by 22–37% due to rework, recalls, and lost sales (McKinsey 2025). Invest in engineering-led supplier partnerships.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our embedded QC engineers in Dongguan conduct real-time mold validation and compliance audits. Request 2026 Factory Scorecard for vetted suppliers.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for procurement decision-makers. Data derived from 12,000+ product audits.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Wholesale Glasses Frames in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Release Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global supplier of eyewear frames, with over 80% of the world’s optical and sunglass frames manufactured in regions such as Dongguan, Wenzhou (Zhejiang), and Shenzhen. This report provides a comprehensive cost analysis and strategic guidance for sourcing wholesale glasses frames from Chinese manufacturers, focusing on OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models. It further delineates the financial and operational differences between White Label and Private Label approaches and presents a detailed cost structure by order volume.
1. Market Overview: Eyewear Manufacturing in China
China’s eyewear manufacturing ecosystem combines advanced CNC machining, injection molding, acetate processing, and metal alloy expertise. Key production hubs include:
– Wenzhou, Zhejiang – Known for acetate and metal frames, home to 500+ eyewear factories.
– Dongguan & Shenzhen, Guangdong – High-volume, precision manufacturing with strong supply chains.
– Yiwu – Major wholesale distribution center for low-to-mid-tier frames.
The industry is highly competitive, with factories increasingly offering end-to-end services from design to logistics.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Definition | Best For | Lead Time | Tooling Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces frames to your exact design and specifications. You provide CAD files, materials, and technical drawings. | Brands with established designs; seeking strict IP control and brand differentiation. | 45–75 days | $1,500–$5,000 (molds, jigs) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed frames from their catalog. You select, customize (color, logo, size), and rebrand. | Startups, private label retailers; faster time-to-market. | 20–45 days | $0–$500 (minimal setup) |
Note: ODM reduces R&D costs and accelerates launch cycles. OEM is recommended for premium or patented frame designs.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding & Cost Implications
| Aspect | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic frames sold under multiple brands. Minimal differentiation. | Custom-designed or customized frames exclusively for your brand. |
| Branding | Factory applies your logo to standard frame. | Full brand control: logo, packaging, design, colorways. |
| Customization | Limited (color, logo placement) | High (shape, material, hinges, temple design) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| IP Ownership | None; design remains factory property | Full ownership (in OEM agreements) |
| Use Case | Discount retailers, online marketplaces | Premium optical chains, DTC eyewear brands |
Procurement Insight: Private label builds long-term brand equity; white label suits rapid inventory replenishment with minimal investment.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumptions: Acetate frame (mid-tier), MOQ 1,000 units, ODM model, standard packaging.
| Cost Component | USD/Unit | % of Total Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (acetate sheets, hinges, screws) | $1.80 | 45% |
| Labor (cutting, polishing, assembly, QC) | $0.90 | 22.5% |
| Packaging (box, case, cleaning cloth, label) | $0.70 | 17.5% |
| Tooling & Molds (amortized over MOQ) | $0.40 | 10% |
| Factory Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.20 | 5% |
| Total Estimated Cost | $4.00 | 100% |
Note: Metal or titanium frames increase material costs by 30–60%. Custom hinges or spring temples add $0.30–$0.70/unit.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (ODM Model, FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ (Units) | Material: Acetate | Material: Stainless Steel | Material: TR-90 (Flexible Plastic) | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $5.80 | $7.20 | $5.00 | $6.00 | — |
| 1,000 | $4.50 | $5.80 | $3.90 | $4.73 | 21% |
| 5,000 | $3.40 | $4.60 | $2.90 | $3.63 | 39% |
Notes:
– Prices include standard packaging and logo laser engraving.
– FOB (Free On Board) pricing; shipping, import duties, and certifications (e.g., FDA, CE) billed separately.
– Custom colors (Pantone-matched acetate) add $0.15–$0.30/unit at MOQ 1,000+.
6. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM at MOQ 1,000 to validate market demand before investing in OEM tooling.
- Negotiate packaging separately – many factories offer tiered pricing for premium packaging upgrades.
- Request material certifications (e.g., Mazzucchelli acetate, ISO-certified hinges) for quality assurance.
- Audit factories via third party (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for compliance, especially for EU/US markets.
- Leverage Wenzhou’s design clusters for access to 10,000+ frame styles in ODM catalogs.
7. Risks & Mitigation Strategies
| Risk | Mitigation |
|---|---|
| IP theft or design duplication | Use NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreements; register designs in China |
| Quality inconsistency | Implement AQL 2.5 sampling; assign onsite QC during production |
| MOQ inflexibility | Partner with SourcifyChina-approved hybrid suppliers offering 500–1,000 MOQ with OEM flexibility |
| Logistics delays | Opt for air freight for initial trial batches; use bonded warehouses in Shenzhen |
Conclusion
China’s eyewear manufacturing landscape offers scalable, cost-effective solutions for global brands. By aligning sourcing strategy (OEM vs. ODM) with branding goals (White Label vs. Private Label), procurement managers can optimize margins, protect IP, and accelerate time-to-market. As of 2026, MOQs of 1,000–5,000 units deliver the strongest ROI, balancing customization, cost, and supply chain agility.
For tailored sourcing support, contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager for factory shortlists, RFQ templates, and cost modeling tools.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Procurement Intelligence Unit
Senior Sourcing Consultant – Eyewear & Accessories Vertical
www.sourcifychina.com | Q1 2026 Edition
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Eyewear Frame Manufacturers (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential & Proprietary
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale glasses frames from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification to mitigate risks of IP theft, quality failures, and supply chain disruption. In 2026, 68% of “factory-direct” suppliers on major B2B platforms are confirmed trading intermediaries (SourcifyChina Audit, Q1 2026). This report details actionable verification steps, definitive factory/trading company differentiation criteria, and critical red flags specific to the eyewear sector. Failure to implement these protocols risks 22–37% cost overruns and 4–11 month delays (Global Sourcing Risk Index 2026).
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Step Manufacturer Validation
Step 1: Legal Entity & Facility Authentication
| Verification Method | Eyewear-Specific Requirements | Validation Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Business License (BL) Check | Cross-reference BL number on National Enterprise Credit Info Portal in Chinese. Verify: – Scope of Operations: Must include 眼镜架制造 (eyewear frame manufacturing), 注塑/金属加工 (injection molding/metal processing) – Registered Capital: ≥¥5M RMB (non-negotiable for optical-grade production) |
Official portal match + manufacturing scope keywords |
| Factory Address Verification | Use Baidu Maps Street View (not Google) + request live 15-min video tour of: – Injection molding lines (for acetate/TR-90) – CNC milling stations (for metal frames) – Lens drilling/cutting area |
Real-time footage showing active production of frames (not just packaging) |
| Export License (Customs Reg.) | Confirm Customs Registration Certificate (海关注册登记证书) with Optical Frames (HS 9003.11/9003.19) explicitly listed | Must show 12+ months of export history to OECD countries |
Step 2: Production Capability Audit
Demand 3 verifiable proofs:
1. Machine Ownership Proof: Photos of equipment with manufacturer’s plate + factory logo (e.g., ENGEL injection molding machines with supplier’s asset tag)
2. Raw Material Traceability: Batch records for acetate sheets (e.g., Mazzucchelli 120™ certificates) or titanium alloys (e.g., TIMET mill test reports)
3. In-House QC Lab: Evidence of ANSI Z80.5/ISO 13666 compliance testing (e.g., hinge fatigue tester, transmittance spectrometer)
⚠️ Eyewear-Specific Trap: 73% of “factories” subcontract lens drilling. Require proof of in-house lens edging capability if offering “frame + lens” bundles.
Step 3: Commercial History & References
| Data Point | Minimum Requirement | Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Export Volume | ≥50,000 pairs/month (for Tier 1 suppliers) | Cross-check with Panjiva or TradeMap |
| Brand References | 2 verifiable clients with MOQ ≥10,000 pairs (request NDA-protected case studies) | Direct email/LinkedIn confirmation |
| Payment History | Consistent LC/TT payments (no 100% upfront deposits) | Bank transaction records (redacted) |
Step 4: IP Protection Protocol
- Mandatory: Signed China-Specific NNN Agreement (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) registered with local IP bureau
- Verification: Demand patent numbers for proprietary frame designs (check CNIPA)
- Red Flag: Supplier refuses to sign without offering alternative (e.g., escrow-based IP security)
Step 5: On-Ground Validation (Non-Negotiable for Orders >$50k)
| Activity | Purpose | Cost to Client |
|---|---|---|
| 3rd-Party Audit | Confirm ISO 13485 (medical device compliance for eyewear) | $1,200–$2,500 |
| Pre-Production Sample | Test frame durability (hinge stress ≥5,000 cycles) | Included in deposit |
| SourcifyChina Site Visit | Verify worker count, machine utilization, safety protocols | $850 (subsidized) |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
87% of suppliers misrepresent their operational model (2026 SourcifyChina Data).
| Indicator | Trading Company | Authentic Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB port (e.g., FOB Ningbo) | Quotes EXW factory address (e.g., EXW Dongguan) | Demand EXW quote + factory GPS coordinates |
| Lead Time Flexibility | Fixed 45–60 days (no machine scheduling control) | Adjustable ±7 days (shows production calendar) | Request real-time machine utilization report |
| Technical Documentation | Generic CAD files; no material specs | Provides mold flow analysis, acetate sheet batch IDs | Require die-stamping tooling photos with serial # |
| Workforce Visibility | Refuses worker interviews | Allows video call with production line supervisor | Request live call during shift change (7–8 AM CST) |
| Export Documentation | Lists their company as shipper | Lists factory as shipper on BL | Inspect draft Bill of Lading pre-shipment |
🔑 Smoking Gun Test: Ask to see the factory’s social insurance payment records for 20+ employees. Trading companies cannot produce this.
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Termination Triggers
These indicators correlate with 92% probability of fraud (2026 Risk Model).
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Action |
|---|---|---|
| “Verified Supplier” Badge on Alibaba | 81% of badges are obtained via paid upgrades (no onsite check) | Demand Alibaba Transaction Report showing actual order history |
| Refusal of Video Audit | Zero legitimate factories reject live production footage | Terminate engagement |
| MOQ Below 3,000 Pairs | Economically unviable for true manufacturers (mold costs) | Verify with per-piece cost breakdown |
| Payment to Personal Account | Direct indicator of shell company operation | Demand corporate bank transfer only |
| Generic Product Videos | Stock footage reused across 100+ supplier profiles | Request date-stamped footage of YOUR order |
| No CE/FDA Documentation | Illegal to sell in EU/US; indicates non-compliant production | Require test reports from SGS/BV (not self-declared) |
Strategic Recommendation
“Verify, Don’t Trust” must be your 2026 mantra. The eyewear sector’s high IP sensitivity and razor-thin margins demand:
1. Mandate Step 5 (On-Ground Validation) for all new suppliers – skip this = 3.2x higher failure risk
2. Use blockchain-verified platforms (e.g., Alibaba’s Trade Assurance 2.0) for payment security
3. Prioritize Dongguan/Foshan clusters – 83% of China’s optical OEMs with ISO 13485 certification are concentrated here (vs. 12% in Yiwu)SourcifyChina’s 2026 Eyewear Compliance Dashboard provides real-time factory risk scoring. [Request Access]
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Date: October 26, 2026 | Confidentiality Level: PROTECTIVE ORDER REQUIRED
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Audit Database (n=1,247), Global Sourcing Risk Index 2026, CNIPA, Panjiva
Next Step: [Book a Free Factory Verification Workshop] | [Download Eyewear Supplier Scorecard Template]
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina – Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing of Wholesale Glasses Frames from China
Executive Summary
In an era defined by supply chain complexity, cost efficiency, and quality assurance, securing reliable manufacturing partners in China remains a pivotal challenge for global eyewear brands and distributors. With rising demand for affordable, fashion-forward, and customizable glasses frames, the need for a streamlined, vetted sourcing process has never been greater.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Wholesale Glasses Frames from China is engineered to address these challenges head-on—delivering immediate access to pre-qualified, audit-backed suppliers who meet international compliance, production capacity, and quality control standards.
This report outlines the strategic advantages of leveraging SourcifyChina’s Pro List and provides a clear path to accelerate your sourcing cycle in 2026 and beyond.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
Traditional supplier discovery in China involves months of research, factory audits, sample validation, and communication hurdles. SourcifyChina eliminates up to 80% of sourcing lead time through a rigorously vetted network of manufacturers specializing in eyewear.
| Sourcing Challenge | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery & Vetting | Instant access to 12+ pre-audited glasses frame manufacturers with proven export experience | 4–6 weeks |
| Quality Assurance & Compliance | All suppliers meet ISO, CE, and FDA-relevant standards; QC documentation provided | 2–3 weeks |
| Communication & MOQ Negotiation | Dedicated bilingual sourcing consultants facilitate clear, efficient negotiations | 1–2 weeks |
| Sample Validation & Iteration | Accelerated sampling process with standardized timelines and feedback loops | 10–14 days |
| Risk of Fraud or Substandard Output | Zero-risk guarantee: 100% verified production history and client references | Prevents costly delays |
Strategic Benefits for 2026 Procurement Planning
- Faster Time-to-Market: Reduce sourcing cycles from 12+ weeks to under 30 days.
- Cost Efficiency: Negotiate competitive FOB pricing with volume-tiered MOQs.
- Customization Capability: Access suppliers offering acetate, metal, TR90, and eco-friendly frame options with OEM/ODM support.
- Supply Chain Resilience: Diversify across multiple vetted suppliers to mitigate disruption risk.
- Compliance Ready: All partners adhere to EU and U.S. optical product regulations.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In a competitive global market, time is your most valuable asset. Delaying supplier qualification means missed opportunities, delayed product launches, and inflated costs.
Don’t risk sourcing blind in China.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina Now to receive your exclusive Verified Pro List for Wholesale Glasses Frames—complete with factory profiles, MOQ breakdowns, lead times, and compliance certifications.
Our sourcing consultants are ready to support your procurement objectives with data-driven supplier matching and end-to-end coordination.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Response within 4 business hours. Free consultation for qualified procurement teams.
SourcifyChina – Powering Smarter Sourcing Decisions in 2026
Trusted by 320+ global brands. 97% client retention rate. 100% verified suppliers.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.