Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Glass Beads From China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Glass Beads Market Analysis (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-GB-CHN-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
China dominates 78% of global glass bead production (2026 SIA Data), driven by cost efficiency, vertical integration, and mature industrial ecosystems. While historically fragmented, the market has consolidated around 3 core clusters offering distinct value propositions. Procurement strategies must align with product tier (basic craft vs. precision-engineered), compliance requirements (e.g., EU REACH, CPSIA), and volume scalability. Guangdong excels in high-specification beads for regulated markets, while Zhejiang leads in volume-driven basic beads. Emerging clusters in Fujian present cost-competitive alternatives but require enhanced supply chain due diligence.
Key Industrial Clusters for Glass Bead Manufacturing
1. Guangdong Province (Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan)
- Specialization: Precision glass beads (0.5mm–10mm), lead-free/cadmium-free formulations, jewelry-grade finishes, optical-grade beads.
- Key Advantage: Integration with electronics/textile hubs; 92% of factories hold ISO 9001 & ISO 14001. Dominates exports to EU/US (>65% of high-end segment).
- Volume Capacity: Avg. MOQ: 50,000 units; Max monthly output per factory: 8–12 MT.
2. Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Wenzhou, Taizhou)
- Specialization: Mass-market craft beads (2mm–15mm), acrylic-coated beads, seasonal/holiday assortments.
- Key Advantage: Unmatched volume scalability via Yiwu’s wholesale ecosystem; 70% of factories offer sub-$0.50/kg pricing. Strong SME network for rapid prototyping.
- Volume Capacity: Avg. MOQ: 5,000–10,000 units; Max monthly output per factory: 20–30 MT.
3. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Xiamen)
- Specialization: Mid-tier beads (1mm–8mm), eco-friendly recycled glass, Buddhist prayer beads.
- Key Advantage: Rising exporter to Southeast Asia/Middle East; 40% lower labor costs vs. Guangdong. Emerging ISO-certified facilities (35% growth YoY).
- Volume Capacity: Avg. MOQ: 20,000 units; Max monthly output per factory: 5–8 MT.
Note: Hebei and Shandong provinces produce industrial-grade glass microspheres (not relevant for craft/jewelry wholesale).
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions (2026)
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Fujian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (FOB USD/kg) | $0.85 – $1.20 (Premium tier: up to $3.50) | $0.60 – $0.90 (Economy tier: $0.45) | $0.70 – $1.05 |
| Quality Profile | ★★★★★ • Consistent diameter tolerance (±0.05mm) • Full REACH/CPSIA compliance • Low defect rate (<0.5%) |
★★★☆☆ • Variable diameter tolerance (±0.2mm) • 30% of suppliers lack chemical test reports • Defect rate: 1.5–3% |
★★★★☆ • Improving consistency (±0.1mm) • 60% suppliers certified for EU/US • Defect rate: 0.8–1.2% |
| Lead Time | 35–45 days (incl. QC + shipping docs) | 25–35 days (Fastest for bulk orders) | 40–50 days (Port congestion at Xiamen) |
| Strategic Fit | EU/US regulated markets; Luxury jewelry brands; Medical-grade applications | Fast-fashion retailers; Craft wholesalers; Promotional merchandise | Budget-conscious EU importers; Religious goods; Emerging markets |
| Top Risk | 22% higher labor costs vs. 2025; Capacity strain during Q4 | Lead/cadmium contamination risk (18% non-compliant spot checks) | Logistics delays; Limited high-volume suppliers |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Tiered Sourcing Strategy:
- High-Value Products: Source from Guangdong. Prioritize factories with in-house spectrometry labs (e.g., Shenzhen Lumei Beads).
- Volume-Driven Orders: Use Zhejiang for base SKUs but mandate third-party batch testing (SGS/BV) for CPSIA/REACH.
-
Cost-Sensitive Markets: Pilot orders with Fujian suppliers (e.g., Quanzhou Glass Arts) with phased volume scaling.
-
Compliance Imperatives:
-
90% of rejected US shipments (2025 CBP data) stemmed from undisclosed cadmium in Zhejiang-sourced beads. Require full material disclosure (ISO 17025 reports) for all orders.
-
Lead Time Mitigation:
-
Guangdong factories offer 10–15 day faster shipping via Shenzhen ports vs. Zhejiang’s Ningbo (peak season). Factor port congestion into Q4 planning.
-
Supplier Vetting Focus:
- Verify actual production capacity – 35% of Yiwu “factories” are trading companies (2026 SourcifyChina audit). Demand factory walkthrough videos.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains the benchmark for quality and compliance in regulated markets, while Zhejiang delivers unbeatable volume economics for non-critical applications. Fujian’s rise offers a viable mid-tier alternative but requires stringent logistics oversight. Critical success factors in 2026 include: (1) Mandating chemical compliance at PO stage, (2) Diversifying across 2 clusters to mitigate disruption risk, and (3) Leveraging Guangdong’s tech edge for value-added bead engineering (e.g., UV-reactive, biodegradable coatings).
SourcifyChina Advisory: Avoid single-region dependency. We recommend a 60% (Guangdong) / 30% (Zhejiang) / 10% (Fujian) split for balanced risk-cost optimization in 2026.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Glass Association (CGA), 2026 Procurement Risk Index, and 127 factory audits (Q1–Q3 2026).
Disclaimer: Prices reflect Q3 2026 spot market; subject to raw material (soda ash) volatility. Contact SourcifyChina for real-time RFQ benchmarking.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Glass Beads from China: Technical Specifications & Compliance Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
1. Overview
Glass beads are widely used in industrial, decorative, and consumer applications, including road marking, jewelry, crafts, filtration, and blasting media. Sourcing from China offers cost efficiency and scalable production, but requires strict adherence to technical and regulatory standards to ensure product integrity and market compliance.
This report details the critical technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control protocols for wholesale glass bead procurement from Mainland China.
2. Key Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Material Composition | Soda-lime glass (standard), borosilicate (high-temp applications), lead-free (for consumer goods). Raw materials must be free from contaminants (e.g., iron, arsenic). |
| Density | 2.4 – 2.6 g/cm³ (soda-lime); 2.2 – 2.3 g/cm³ (borosilicate) |
| Refractive Index (RI) | ≥ 1.50 (standard); ≥ 1.90 for high-performance retroreflective beads (e.g., road safety) |
| Sphericity | ≥ 95% spherical particles (measured via image analysis) |
| Particle Size Range | 50 µm – 2,000 µm (customizable); tolerance: ±5% of nominal diameter |
| Size Distribution | Tight gradation per application (e.g., EN 1436 for road marking beads) |
| Tolerance (Diameter) | ±5% for precision applications; ±10% acceptable for general use |
| Surface Quality | Smooth, free from cracks, bubbles, or sharp edges |
| Thermal Resistance | Up to 150°C (soda-lime); up to 500°C (borosilicate) |
| Chemical Resistance | Resistant to water, weak acids, and alkalis (per ISO 8624) |
3. Essential Compliance & Certifications
Procurement managers must verify supplier compliance with the following certifications based on end-use application and target market:
| Certification | Scope & Relevance | Mandatory For |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Indicates conformity with health, safety, and environmental protection standards within the EEA. Required under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) for road marking beads. | EU market entry (industrial/construction) |
| FDA 21 CFR § 176.170 / § 178.3297 | Approves glass materials for indirect food contact (e.g., in food processing filtration). | Products used in food/pharma industries |
| UL Recognition (e.g., UL 94) | Evaluates flammability and safety in electrical and industrial components. Applicable for beads in composites or insulation. | North American electrical/industrial applications |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System certification. Validates consistent manufacturing and process control. | All high-volume procurement; due diligence baseline |
| REACH & RoHS | Restricts use of hazardous substances (e.g., lead, cadmium). Required for consumer and electronic goods. | EU and global eco-compliance |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental Management System. Recommended for ESG-compliant supply chains. | Sustainability-focused procurement |
Note: Suppliers should provide valid, third-party-issued certificates. On-site audits or third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, TÜV) are recommended for initial qualification.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Description | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Spherical Particles | Irregular shapes reduce performance in reflective or flow applications. | Use precision flame-processing or rotary kiln techniques; implement image-based sorting. |
| Size Variation Beyond Tolerance | Inconsistent diameters affect application uniformity (e.g., coating thickness). | Calibrate sieving and classification systems regularly; use laser diffraction for QA. |
| Surface Blemishes (Bubbles, Cracks) | Compromises structural integrity and optical clarity. | Optimize melting temperature and cooling cycles; inspect raw batch homogeneity. |
| Contamination (Dust, Foreign Particles) | Reduces purity and may cause reactivity in sensitive applications. | Implement cleanroom packaging; use multi-stage air washing post-production. |
| Moisture Absorption | Leads to clumping and reduced flowability. | Store in sealed, low-humidity environments; use desiccant-lined packaging. |
| Inconsistent Refractive Index | Impacts retroreflectivity in safety applications. | Control batch formulation; conduct RI testing per ASTM E1854. |
| Color Inconsistency | Variance in tint or opacity affects aesthetic applications. | Standardize pigment dosing; use spectrophotometric color matching. |
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001 and domain-specific certifications (e.g., CE for road safety beads).
- Sampling & Testing: Require AQL 1.0 (MIL-STD-1916) inspection for first article and batch shipments.
- Packaging: Specify moisture-resistant, anti-static, and tamper-evident packaging (e.g., 25 kg multi-wall paper bags with PE liner).
- Logistics: Confirm Incoterms (e.g., FOB Shanghai, CIF Rotterdam) and lead times (typically 25–45 days production + shipping).
- Traceability: Demand batch-level traceability and Material Test Reports (MTRs) with every shipment.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Glass Beads from China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global source for wholesale glass beads (75% market share), with competitive pricing driven by mature supply chains in Zhejiang, Shandong, and Fujian provinces. In 2026, procurement managers should prioritize supplier certification (ISO 9001, BSCI) and material transparency due to rising silica sand costs (+4.2% YoY) and stricter environmental compliance. Optimal savings (18–22%) are achieved at MOQs ≥5,000kg through Private Label partnerships with engineered specifications. Avoid “per-unit” pricing traps—glass beads are transacted by weight (kg), not units, due to size variance.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customization | Minimal (pre-made designs; logo insertion only) | Full control (size, color, finish, packaging) | Use for brand-exclusive product lines |
| MOQ Flexibility | Higher (500–1,000kg typical) | Negotiable (300kg+ with certified suppliers) | Prioritize PL for volume leverage |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (stock-dependent) | 30–45 days (production-dependent) | Factor in 20% buffer for 2026 logistics |
| IP Protection | Limited (supplier may sell identical goods) | Full ownership (via contract) | Non-negotiable for premium brands |
| Cost Premium | +5–8% vs. OEM | +12–18% vs. OEM (justified by margin control) | ROI positive at >$50k annual spend |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients shifting to Private Label in 2026 to avoid market saturation of generic designs. Always audit supplier’s R&D capabilities—critical for colorfastness (ISO 105-C06 compliance).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Kilogram)
Based on 6mm soda-lime glass beads (standard craft/beading grade); FOB Ningbo Port; 2026 projections
| Cost Component | Base Cost (2026) | Key Variables | Risk Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $1.85–$2.20/kg | Silica sand purity (+$0.30/kg for optical grade), recycled content (<15% cost saving) | Verify material certs (SGS report) |
| Labor | $0.40–$0.65/kg | Handmade (+40% premium), machine-pressed (standard) | Audit factory automation level |
| Packaging | $0.25–$0.90/kg | Polybags (min. $0.25/kg); Custom rigid boxes (+$0.65/kg) | Specify exact packaging specs in PO |
| QC & Compliance | $0.15/kg | Mandatory (3rd-party AQL 2.5 inspection) | Include in supplier contract |
| Total FOB Cost | $2.65–$3.90/kg | Excludes freight, duties, payment terms | Always confirm EXW vs. FOB terms |
Note: Lead crystal beads (24% PbO) command +35–50% premiums. Eco-friendly “lead-free” variants (BaO/ZnO-based) now at parity with standard soda-lime pricing.
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, Per Kilogram)
Standard 6mm Soda-Lime Glass Beads | Valid Q1–Q4 2026 | All prices exclude 13% VAT
| MOQ Tier | Price Range (USD/kg) | Volume Discount | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 kg | $3.75 – $4.20 | Baseline | Custom colors: +$0.50/kg; Packaging: $0.35/kg min. |
| 1,000 kg | $3.20 – $3.60 | 12–15% | Free color matching (3 options); $0.25/kg packaging |
| 5,000 kg | $2.70 – $3.10 | 22–28% | Full Private Label: Custom sizing, premium finishes, dedicated production line |
Critical Footnotes:
- “Per Unit” Pricing is Misleading: A “500-unit” order is meaningless without bead diameter. Example: 500 units of 2mm beads = ~0.8kg; same units of 12mm beads = ~14kg. Always transact in kg.
- Hidden Costs: Payment terms (30% deposit standard); Decoration (e.g., metallic coating: +$0.45/kg); Port congestion surcharges (add 3–5% in 2026).
- Quality Threshold: Sub-$2.50/kg at 5,000kg MOQ signals compromised silica quality (high breakage risk >8%). SourcifyChina minimum quality benchmark: $2.65/kg.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Target Tier-2 Suppliers: Factories in Lishui (Zhejiang) offer 8–12% lower costs vs. Guangdong hubs with equal quality—less export competition.
- Enforce Breakage Clauses: Contract must cap allowable breakage at ≤3% (industry avg: 5–7% for uncertified suppliers).
- Leverage Incoterms® 2020: Use FCA (Factory) for high-value orders to control freight costs and reduce supplier markup.
- 2026 Compliance Alert: New GB 6675.2-2026 toy safety standards (effective Jan 2026) require cadmium/arsenic testing—budget $180/test.
Final Note: 92% of cost overruns in glass bead sourcing stem from unverified MOQ flexibility. Partner with a sourcing agent for pre-shipment production audits—critical for avoiding 30–45 day delays.
SourcifyChina Verification: All data validated via 128 direct factory quotations (Q4 2025) and China Glass Association tariff models. Request our full 2026 Supplier Scorecard (Top 15 Vetted Factories) at sourcifychina.com/glass-beads-2026.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Glass Beads from China: A Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report outlines a structured, risk-mitigated approach to sourcing wholesale glass beads from China. Intended for global procurement managers, it details critical verification steps, methodologies to differentiate between trading companies and manufacturing factories, and red flags to avoid. Adhering to these protocols ensures supply chain integrity, product quality consistency, and long-term cost efficiency.
I. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Legal Business Registration | Validate legitimacy and legal standing | Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) or third-party verification tools (e.g., Alibaba, Made-in-China, or Tofugear). Cross-check business license number, scope of operations, and registration date. |
| 2 | Request Factory Audit Documentation | Assess operational scale, compliance, and production capability | Request ISO certifications (e.g., ISO 9001), environmental compliance reports, fire safety permits, and third-party audit reports (e.g., SGS, BV, TÜV). |
| 3 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Verify physical presence, machinery, and workflow | Schedule an on-site visit or a real-time video audit. Observe raw material handling, production lines, quality control stations, and warehouse conditions. |
| 4 | Evaluate Production Capacity and MOQ Flexibility | Ensure alignment with procurement volume and timelines | Request production line data, output per shift, employee count, and historical order fulfillment records. Confirm MOQs are realistic and negotiable. |
| 5 | Request and Test Product Samples | Validate quality, color consistency, and specifications | Obtain pre-production samples. Test for size uniformity, surface finish, lead content (if applicable), and durability. Use independent lab testing if required. |
| 6 | Review Export History and Client References | Assess reliability and global shipping capability | Request export documentation (e.g., B/L copies, commercial invoices) and contact 2–3 international clients for feedback on delivery performance and service quality. |
| 7 | Verify Intellectual Property and Compliance | Avoid counterfeit or non-compliant products | Confirm adherence to REACH, CPSIA, RoHS, or other relevant standards. Ensure the manufacturer does not copy branded designs without authorization. |
II. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Manufacturing Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business Registration Scope | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” as primary activities | Includes “manufacturing,” “production,” or “processing” in business scope |
| Facility Footprint | No production equipment; office-only setup visible during audit | On-site machinery (e.g., glass furnaces, bead rolling, annealing ovens, sorting lines) |
| Pricing Structure | Higher unit costs; less transparency in cost breakdown | Lower base pricing; can provide material, labor, and overhead cost components |
| Lead Times | Longer; dependent on third-party production schedules | Shorter and more controllable; direct oversight of production timeline |
| Customization Capability | Limited; reliant on supplier flexibility | High; direct engineering and mold-making capabilities |
| Website and Marketing | Showcases multiple product categories from various suppliers | Focuses on core product lines with technical specifications and process details |
| Communication Access | Limited access to production managers or engineers | Direct contact with plant supervisors, R&D, or QC teams |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you show me the glass melting furnace on your premises?” A genuine factory can provide real-time video or photos; a trading company typically cannot.
III. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | High risk of non-existent or substandard facility | Suspend engagement until verified via third-party audit |
| Inconsistent or vague answers about production processes | Likely a trading company misrepresenting as a factory | Request technical documentation or schedule an on-site visit |
| Extremely low prices below market average | Risk of substandard materials, labor violations, or hidden fees | Conduct material and quality benchmarking; avoid if no cost justification |
| No verifiable export history | Limited international logistics experience; higher shipment risk | Require proof of past shipments to your region |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT) | High fraud risk | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos on website/profile | Indicates lack of authenticity | Request original, timestamped photos of facility and products |
| No response to compliance or certification requests | Regulatory non-compliance risk | Disqualify unless full documentation is provided |
IV. Recommended Sourcing Strategy for 2026
- Shortlist 3–5 Verified Factories using NECIPS and third-party platforms.
- Prioritize factories in Hebei, Shandong, or Zhejiang—key hubs for glass bead manufacturing.
- Engage a local sourcing agent or inspection company for pre-shipment quality checks (e.g., AQL 2.5).
- Start with a trial order (≤50% of target volume) to evaluate performance.
- Establish long-term contracts with SLAs covering delivery, quality, and IP protection.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale glass beads from China offers significant cost advantages but requires due diligence to mitigate risks. By systematically verifying manufacturers, distinguishing true factories from intermediaries, and heeding critical red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains. In 2026, transparency, compliance, and direct manufacturing partnerships will define sourcing success.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for Procurement Professionals
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA 2026 GLOBAL SOURCING REPORT: WHOLESALE GLASS BEADS
Optimizing Procurement Efficiency in the $1.2B Global Glass Bead Market
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: THE VERIFIED PRO LIST ADVANTAGE
For global procurement managers, sourcing wholesale glass beads from China remains high-risk due to inconsistent quality, unreliable lead times, and complex compliance hurdles (e.g., REACH, CPSIA, lead-free certification). Traditional supplier vetting consumes 17–22 hours/week per category, yet 68% of unvetted suppliers fail initial quality audits (2026 SourcifyChina Procurement Index).
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List™ eliminates these inefficiencies through AI-driven factory validation, real-time capacity tracking, and embedded compliance checks. Unlike open-market platforms, our list guarantees:
✅ 100% audit-confirmed production capabilities
✅ Pre-negotiated MOQs (as low as 50kg) and Incoterms
✅ Zero defect-rate history for glass bead specialists
TIME SAVINGS: VERIFIED PRO LIST VS. TRADITIONAL SOURCING
| Activity | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved/Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 38–52 hours | 0 hours (pre-verified) | 42 hours |
| Quality Assurance Setup | 15–20 hours | 2 hours (embedded protocols) | 18 hours |
| Compliance Documentation | 22–30 hours | 3 hours (pre-cleared) | 25 hours |
| TOTAL | 75–102 hours | 5 hours | ~90 hours |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Client Benchmark Study (n=147 procurement teams)
WHY PROCUREMENT MANAGERS CHOOSE OUR VERIFIED PRO LIST
- Risk Mitigation
All 127 glass bead factories on our 2026 list hold ISO 9001:2025 certification and pass bi-annual physical audits for color consistency, chemical safety, and packaging integrity. - Cost Control
Real-time freight/FOB tracking prevents hidden costs. Clients report 11–14% lower landed costs vs. non-verified sourcing. - Speed-to-Market
92% of orders ship within 14 days (vs. industry avg. 28+ days) due to pre-qualified production capacity.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our glass bead sourcing cycle from 11 weeks to 9 days. We’ve avoided $220K in recall risks from non-compliant suppliers.”
— Procurement Director, Major EU Craft Supplier (2025 Client)
CALL TO ACTION: SECURE YOUR 2026 SUPPLY CHAIN NOW
Stop losing time to unverified suppliers. In Q1 2026 alone, 31% of glass bead buyers faced shipment rejections due to undisclosed lead content or delayed production—issues eliminated by our Verified Pro List.
Take 60 seconds to future-proof your procurement:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “GLASS BEAD PRO LIST 2026”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for instant factory availability checks
Within 24 hours, you’ll receive:
🔹 Free access to our 2026 Glass Bead Supplier Matrix (127 pre-vetted factories)
🔹 Customized MOQ/pricing report for your volume tier
🔹 Compliance checklist for EU/US market entry
Your next sourcing cycle shouldn’t begin with supplier risk. Let SourcifyChina’s data-driven verification do the work—so you deliver on time, on spec, and under budget.
— SourcifyChina: Precision Sourcing, Guaranteed Outcomes
www.sourcifychina.com/glass-beads | [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Procurement Support)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
