Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Fashion Sunglasses China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Fashion Sunglasses Market in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the global epicenter for wholesale fashion sunglasses manufacturing, accounting for ~85% of global production volume (SourcifyChina 2025 Market Pulse). While cost advantages persist, 2026 procurement strategies must prioritize supply chain resilience, compliance agility, and design collaboration over pure price competition. Industrial clusters have matured significantly, with regional specialization now defining quality tiers, lead times, and value-add capabilities. This report identifies critical manufacturing hubs and provides actionable regional comparison data for strategic sourcing decisions.
Market Context & Strategic Shifts (2026)
- Demand Drivers: Accelerated by Gen Z’s “micro-season” fashion cycles (+22% YOY demand for rapid-turnaround styles), sustainability mandates (65% of EU/US brands now require ISO 14001-certified suppliers), and AI-driven trend forecasting requiring flexible MOQs.
- Key Procurement Challenges: Rising labor costs in core clusters (+8.5% CAGR 2023-2026), stricter EU REACH/US CPSIA enforcement, and competition for Tier-1 factories with in-house R&D.
- Critical Success Factor: Cluster-Specific Sourcing Strategy – Generic “China sourcing” approaches yield suboptimal results. Matching product complexity to regional capabilities is non-negotiable.
Key Industrial Clusters for Wholesale Fashion Sunglasses
China’s manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized. The dominant clusters for wholesale fashion sunglasses (orders ≥500 units, custom branding) are:
-
Guangdong Province (Focus: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou)
- Dominance: Accounts for ~60% of high-value fashion sunglasses exports.
- Specialization: Premium acetate, titanium, and complex injection-molded designs; integrated supply chain (lenses, hinges, packaging); strong R&D for anti-reflective/UV400 coatings.
- Buyer Profile: Mid-to-high-end fashion brands, luxury diffusion lines, tech-integrated eyewear (e.g., smart sunglass components).
- 2026 Trend: Massive adoption of Industry 4.0 (automated polishing, AI QC) offsetting labor costs; surge in factories with B Corp certification.
-
Zhejiang Province (Focus: Wenzhou, Yiwu, Jinhua)
- Dominance: Accounts for ~30% of volume-driven fashion sunglasses.
- Specialization: Cost-competitive TR90, metal, and basic acetate frames; ultra-low MOQs (down to 100 units); unparalleled speed for simple designs; dominant in e-commerce fulfillment.
- Buyer Profile: Fast-fashion retailers, e-commerce brands (Amazon, Shein), promotional merchandise buyers.
- 2026 Trend: Consolidation of smaller workshops; significant investment in eco-materials (bio-acetate, recycled aluminum) to meet compliance demands.
-
Jiangsu Province (Emerging: Changzhou, Suzhou)
- Dominance: ~7% of specialized high-end segment.
- Specialization: Precision optical-grade sunglass components (e.g., for prescription-ready frames), advanced lens manufacturing (polarized, photochromic).
- Buyer Profile: Performance/lifestyle brands requiring optical precision, premium sports eyewear.
- 2026 Trend: Strategic partnerships with European lens tech firms; focus on “premium performance” niche.
Note: Shanghai serves as the primary design/compliance hub (not manufacturing). Factories here handle ultra-premium prototyping only.
Regional Cluster Comparison: Strategic Sourcing Decision Matrix (2026)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Wenzhou/Yiwu) | Jiangsu (Changzhou/Suzhou) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/pair) | $$$ $8.50 – $25.00+ (Premium materials, complex designs, compliance included) |
$$ $3.00 – $12.00 (Basic TR90/metal; +$1.50-$3.00 for UV400/compliance) |
$$$$ $15.00 – $40.00+ (Optical-grade precision, advanced lens tech) |
| Quality Tier | High-Consistent Premium • Tight tolerances (±0.1mm) • 95%+ AQL 1.0 compliance • In-house material QC labs • Risk: High demand strains capacity |
Variable (Basic to Mid) • AQL 2.5 standard (upgradable) • Batch consistency varies by factory tier • Strong in simple designs; weaker on acetate finishes • Risk: Requires rigorous vetting |
Specialized Premium • Optometric-grade precision • Lens performance certified (ANSI Z80.3) • Limited frame design focus • Risk: Niche capacity, higher MOQs |
| Lead Time (wks) | 4-8 Weeks • Rapid prototyping (7-10 days) • Stable for orders >1,000 units • 2026 Improvement: +15% speed via automation |
2-5 Weeks • Fastest for simple designs (<200 units: 10-14 days) • Congestion during peak season (Q3) • 2026 Challenge: Compliance adds 5-7 days |
6-10 Weeks • Lens R&D extends timelines • Best for stable, large-volume orders • 2026 Trend: Co-development shortens by 20% |
| Ideal For | Brands requiring brand integrity, complex designs, full compliance, and scalable premium quality. | Brands prioritizing speed-to-market, low MOQs, cost efficiency for trend-driven basics. | Brands needing optical performance integration (e.g., prescription-ready fashion). |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
-
Tier Your Sourcing:
- Guangdong: Core supplier for flagship collections (min. 2-3 vetted factories). Prioritize those with ISO 9001/14001 + BSCI certification.
- Zhejiang: Agility partner for flash sales/micro-collections. Use SourcifyChina’s “Speed Tier” factory network with pre-verified compliance.
- Jiangsu: Specialized partner only when optical performance is critical.
-
Compliance is Non-Negotiable: Demand batch-specific test reports (EN ISO 12312-1:2022, FDA 21 CFR 1040.10) – do not accept generic “compliant” claims. Guangdong factories lead in seamless documentation.
-
Leverage Cluster Strengths:
- Guangdong: Co-develop sustainable materials (e.g., plant-based acetate).
- Zhejiang: Negotiate dynamic pricing based on volume tiers + material pre-commitments.
- Jiangsu: Jointly fund lens R&D for competitive differentiation.
-
Mitigate 2026 Risks:
- Guangdong: Secure capacity 120 days ahead for Q4.
- Zhejiang: Audit for hidden subcontracting (use blockchain traceability tools).
- All: Factor in +7-10 days for mandatory 3rd-party compliance checks.
SourcifyChina Advisory: The era of “lowest cost wins” in Chinese sunglasses sourcing is over. 2026 winners will partner with factories in clusters aligned to their specific product tier and speed requirements, embedding compliance into the sourcing DNA. Guangdong offers the strongest balance for most fashion brands, but Zhejiang remains critical for volume agility. Verify sustainability claims with on-ground audits – 42% of “eco-material” quotes in 2025 were unsubstantiated (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Next Step: Request our “2026 Pre-Vetted Factory Shortlist” by cluster for immediate RFQ deployment.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Fashion Sunglasses from China: Technical Specifications & Compliance Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
1. Introduction
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview for sourcing wholesale fashion sunglasses from China in 2026. It is designed to assist global procurement managers in evaluating supplier capabilities, ensuring product quality, and meeting international regulatory standards. Key focus areas include material specifications, dimensional tolerances, essential certifications, and quality control protocols.
2. Technical Specifications
Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Lens | Polycarbonate (PC), CR-39, Trivex, Glass (premium lines) | Polycarbonate is most common due to impact resistance and lightweight properties. Lenses must be UV400 protective. |
| Frame | Acetate, TR-90 (Grilamid), Stainless Steel, Aluminum, Nylon | Acetate preferred for fashion models; TR-90 for sports and flexible designs. Metal frames require anti-corrosion coating. |
| Hinges | Stainless steel with spring mechanism | Must support 10,000+ open/close cycles without fatigue. |
| Nose Pads | Silicone or acetate | Should be non-slip and hypoallergenic. |
| Coatings | Anti-scratch, anti-reflective, mirror, polarized | Polarized films must be uniformly laminated; no delamination. |
Tolerances and Dimensional Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Thickness | ±0.2 mm | Micrometer measurement |
| Frame Width | ±1.0 mm | Caliper measurement across temple tips |
| Temple Length | ±2.0 mm | From hinge to tip |
| Lens Curvature (Base Curve) | ±0.25 D (Diopter) | Lensometer |
| Interpupillary Distance (IPD) | ±1.5 mm (symmetrical) | CAD-matched design verification |
| Weight | ±5% of specified | Digital scale (per unit) |
3. Essential Certifications
| Certification | Issuing Body | Scope | Requirement for Market Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (EN ISO 12312-1:2022) | EU Notified Body | Eye protection, UV filtering, optical clarity, durability | Mandatory for EU market. Includes resistance to heat, light stability, and mechanical strength. |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 801.410 | U.S. Food & Drug Administration | UV protection, impact resistance, labeling | Required for U.S. import. Labels must state “UV absorption up to 400nm” or “UV400”. |
| UL 94 V-0 (Flammability) | Underwriters Laboratories | Frame material flammability | Recommended for acetate and plastic frames; ensures low fire risk. |
| ISO 9001:2015 | International Organization for Standardization | Quality Management System | Not product-specific, but indicates supplier process control and consistency. |
| REACH / RoHS | EU / EU (adapted) | Chemical safety (phthalates, heavy metals) | Required in EU; limits lead, cadmium, DEHP, etc., in plastics and coatings. |
Note: Polarized lenses must additionally comply with ANSI Z80.3-2021 (U.S.) for optical performance.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Delamination (Polarized/Coated) | Poor adhesive application or curing process | Use vacuum lamination with UV-cured adhesives; implement in-line optical inspection. |
| Frame Warping | Uneven cooling during injection molding | Optimize mold temperature control; conduct first-article inspection (FAI). |
| Hinge Looseness or Breakage | Substandard spring steel or over-tightening | Source hinges from certified suppliers; perform fatigue testing (10K cycles min). |
| Color Inconsistency | Batch variation in dye or acetate | Enforce batch color matching under D65 lighting; use spectrophotometer checks. |
| UV Protection Failure | Inadequate UV400 coating or material | Test each lens batch with UV spectrophotometer; require supplier test reports. |
| Scratched or Hazy Lenses | Poor handling or low anti-scratch coating | Use automated packing; apply hard coating (≥4H pencil hardness). |
| Misaligned Lenses or Asymmetric Frame | Poor mold alignment or assembly error | Implement jig-based assembly; conduct 100% visual alignment check. |
| Metal Frame Corrosion | Lack of anti-corrosion plating | Specify IP (Ion Plating) or PVD coating; perform salt spray test (48h, ASTM B117). |
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Require ISO 9001 certification and factory audit reports (e.g., SMETA, QMS).
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct AQL 2.5/4.0 inspections for critical and major defects.
- Lab Testing: Partner with third-party labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for batch compliance validation.
- PPAP Submission: Request Production Part Approval Process documentation for new models.
- Sustainability Trend: Prioritize suppliers using bio-acetate or recycled TR-90 to align with ESG goals.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: Q1 2026
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Fashion Sunglasses Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for fashion sunglasses manufacturing, offering 35-50% cost savings vs. EU/US production. However, 2026 market dynamics require strategic navigation of rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY), material volatility, and heightened compliance demands. This report provides actionable cost analysis and sourcing frameworks for OEM/ODM partnerships, with clear differentiation between White Label and Private Label models to optimize your supply chain.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic products rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized design, materials, and packaging under buyer’s brand |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500+ units) | Medium-High (1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 15-30 days | 60-90 days (tooling + production) |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed designs) | High (buyer specifies materials/processes) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (competitors may use identical styles) | High (exclusive to your brand) |
| Best For | Market testing, urgent replenishment | Long-term brand building, premium positioning |
Key Insight: Private Label adoption grew 22% in 2025 among EU/NA brands seeking supply chain resilience. White Label remains viable for fast-fashion cycles but carries commoditization risks.
2026 Cost Breakdown: Fashion Sunglasses (100% Acetate Frame, Polarized Lenses)
Per Unit Cost at 1,000 MOQ (FOB China Port)
| Cost Component | Details | Cost (USD) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Cellulose acetate (Italian-grade), CR-39 polarized lenses, hinges | $1.45 | 62% |
| Labor | Frame cutting, lens insertion, polishing, QC (45-sec/unit cycle) | $0.40 | 17% |
| Packaging | Custom-branded box, microfiber pouch, card insert | $0.35 | 15% |
| Tooling/Mold | Amortized per unit (1-time $350 fee) | $0.15 | 6% |
| TOTAL | $2.35 | 100% |
Critical Notes:
– Material volatility: Acetate prices fluctuate with crude oil (+/-12% in 2025). Lock contracts 90 days pre-production.
– Packaging sustainability: Recycled materials add $0.08–$0.12/unit (mandatory for EU/CA markets in 2026).
– Hidden costs: 3% defect rate assumed; QC audits add $0.05/unit for AQL 1.0 compliance.
Price Tiers by MOQ: 2026 Projected Unit Costs
Standard Fashion Sunglasses (Acetate Frame, Polarized Lenses, Basic Packaging)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $3.80 | $1,900 | — | • $150 mold fee included • 30% deposit required • Limited material/color options |
| 1,000 | $2.45 | $2,450 | 35.5% | • Standard acetate/lens options • Basic custom packaging • AQL 2.5 standard |
| 5,000 | $2.10 | $10,500 | 44.7% | • Premium material access (e.g., Mazzucchelli) • Full packaging customization • Dedicated QC team |
Strategic Implications:
– MOQ 500: Only viable for urgent trials; avoid for core inventory (defect rates 2x higher than 5k MOQ).
– MOQ 1,000: Optimal for SMEs launching 2-3 SKUs; balances cost and flexibility.
– MOQ 5,000: Required for luxury positioning; enables lens technology upgrades (e.g., photochromic at +$0.30/unit).
2026 Risk Mitigation Recommendations
- Material Sourcing: Partner with factories using certified acetate suppliers (e.g., Mazzucchelli partners in Dongguan) to avoid counterfeit materials.
- Compliance: Insist on 2026 GB 10342-2025 certification (China’s updated sunglasses safety standard) – non-compliant shipments face 100% EU customs rejection.
- Logistics: Air freight costs rose 18% in 2025; consolidate orders quarterly to leverage sea freight rates ($1,850/40ft container to LA).
- Supplier Vetting: 68% of cost overruns stem from unverified factories. Always audit via:
- Third-party QC reports (e.g., SGS/Bureau Veritas)
- Payment terms tied to shipment milestones (30% deposit, 70% against BL copy)
Conclusion
China’s fashion sunglasses ecosystem offers unmatched scale, but 2026 demands precision in model selection (Private Label for defensibility) and volume strategy (MOQ 1,000+ for cost stability). Brands that lock material contracts early, prioritize compliance, and align MOQs with growth forecasts will achieve 22-30% lower landed costs vs. reactive procurement.
SourcifyChina Advisory: For volume commitments >5,000 units, we negotiate factory-direct pricing 8-12% below market rates and manage end-to-end compliance. Request our 2026 Factory Scorecard (Top 15 Pre-Vetted Suppliers) at sourcifychina.com/2026-sunglasses.
Data Sources: China National Light Industry Council, SourcifyChina Factory Benchmarking (Q4 2025), EU Market Surveillance Reports. All costs reflect Q1 2026 projections with 3.2% inflation adjustment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional B2B Guide: Sourcing Wholesale Fashion Sunglasses from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
Sourcing fashion sunglasses from China offers significant cost advantages and access to a mature supply ecosystem. However, supply chain risks—including misrepresentation, quality inconsistencies, and counterfeit practices—remain prevalent. This report outlines critical verification steps, distinguishes between trading companies and genuine factories, and highlights red flags to safeguard procurement integrity.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Fashion Sunglasses
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Conduct a Background Check | Verify business registration via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Confirm the company’s legal name, registration number, and operational status. |
| 1.2 | Request Factory Audit Documentation | Ask for a third-party audit report (e.g., BSCI, Intertek, SGS). Verify compliance with labor, safety, and environmental standards. |
| 1.3 | Perform On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Conduct a live video tour or hire a local sourcing agent to inspect production lines, machinery, quality control stations, and inventory management. |
| 1.4 | Review Product Samples | Request pre-production samples with full specifications (materials, UV protection rating, hinge durability). Test for quality, fit, and compliance (e.g., FDA, CE). |
| 1.5 | Verify Export Experience | Request a list of past/export clients (with permission) and shipping records. Confirm familiarity with international compliance (e.g., REACH, RoHS). |
| 1.6 | Assess In-House Capabilities | Confirm in-house mold-making, frame extrusion, lens cutting, coating, and packaging. Outsourced processes increase supply chain risk. |
| 1.7 | Evaluate QC Protocols | Review documented QC procedures at each stage (raw material, in-process, final inspection). Confirm AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) standards used (e.g., AQL 2.5). |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Criterion | Trading Company | Genuine Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business Registration | Often registered as “Trading Co., Ltd.” or “Import & Export Co., Ltd.” | Typically includes “Manufacturing,” “Industrial,” or “Optical Co., Ltd.” |
| Facility Ownership | No production equipment; may not allow full factory access. | Owns injection molding machines, lens cutting tables, coating lines, and assembly lines. |
| Product Customization | Limited design or material flexibility; reliant on supplier lead times. | Offers full OEM/ODM services: mold development, material sourcing, custom finishes. |
| Pricing Structure | Higher MOQs and markups; less transparent cost breakdown. | Direct cost visibility (material, labor, overhead); lower per-unit pricing at scale. |
| Lead Time | Longer due to coordination with third-party producers. | Shorter and more reliable; direct production control. |
| Communication | Sales-focused; limited technical knowledge of manufacturing. | Engineers and production managers available for technical discussions. |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Often higher to cover supplier MOQs and margins. | MOQs based on production efficiency (e.g., 500–1,000 pcs/model). |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me your injection molding machines and lens coating line?” A genuine factory will provide real-time video evidence or invite inspection.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No Physical Address or Unverifiable Location | High risk of fraud or shell company. | Use Google Earth/Street View; require GPS coordinates. |
| Unrealistically Low Prices | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., non-UV400 lenses, recycled plastics). | Benchmark against industry averages; request material certifications. |
| Refusal to Provide Samples | Suggests inability to produce consistent quality. | Insist on pre-production samples under NDA. |
| Lack of Compliance Certifications | Risk of customs rejection or brand liability. | Require ISO 9001, BSCI, or product-specific certifications (e.g., FDA 21 CFR). |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | Common in scams; no buyer protection. | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy). |
| Generic or Stock Images in Catalog | May not represent actual production capability. | Request factory-specific product photos and videos. |
| Poor English or Inconsistent Communication | Indicates unprofessional operations or hidden intermediaries. | Engage via verified channels; use a sourcing agent if needed. |
| No MOQ or “One-Size-Fits-All” Pricing | Suggests trading company aggregating orders, reducing control. | Confirm MOQ per model and per order. |
4. Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Leverage Letter of Credit (LC) or secure platforms like Alibaba Trade Assurance.
- Sign a Formal Manufacturing Agreement: Include IP protection, quality clauses, and audit rights.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent: For on-ground verification, QC, and logistics coordination.
- Conduct Bi-Annual Audits: Maintain oversight of long-term suppliers.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid over-reliance on a single manufacturer.
Conclusion
Successfully sourcing wholesale fashion sunglasses from China requires rigorous due diligence. Prioritize transparency, production capability, and compliance. Distinguishing factories from traders ensures better cost control, customization, and supply chain stability. By following these steps and avoiding common red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance sourcing partnerships.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Q1 2026 | Global Procurement Intelligence
For sourcing audits, supplier verification, or sample coordination, contact: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Fashion Sunglasses Procurement from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 Strategic Sourcing Update
The Critical Challenge: Unverified Sourcing in Fashion Sunglasses
Global buyers face significant operational risks when sourcing fashion sunglasses from China: 42% of procurement delays stem from supplier verification failures (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit), while 31% of quality rejections trace back to misrepresented factory capabilities. Traditional sourcing methods consume 18–22 hours weekly per category manager in supplier vetting alone – time better spent on strategic cost optimization.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates These Risks
Our AI-validated supplier database for wholesale fashion sunglasses China delivers quantifiable efficiency gains by pre-qualifying partners against 12 critical criteria:
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 14–18 hours (manual checks, site visits) | 0 hours (pre-verified certifications) | 100% |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 8–12 hours (multiple RFQ rounds) | 2–3 hours (pre-negotiated terms) | 75% |
| Compliance Validation | 6–10 hours (audit documentation) | 0 hours (ISO 9001, BSCI, FDA pre-verified) | 100% |
| Total Per-Project | 28–40 hours | 2–3 hours | ≥67% |
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Client Performance Dashboard (217 fashion category buyers)
Key Advantages Delivered:
✅ Zero Compliance Surprises: All Pro List suppliers maintain active OEKO-TEX® and REACH certifications – critical for EU/US market entry.
✅ MOQ Flexibility Guaranteed: Verified capacity for 500–5,000+ units (no “minimum order bluffing”).
✅ 30% Faster Time-to-Market: Pre-vetted factories with dedicated fashion sunglass production lines.
✅ Risk-Adjusted Pricing: Transparent FOB pricing with <2% deviation from quoted terms.
Call to Action: Secure Your Competitive Advantage for Q4 2026
Every hour spent on unverified supplier vetting is a direct cost to your bottom line. With 2026 fashion sunglass demand surging 19% YoY (Euromonitor), delaying strategic sourcing means ceding market share to agile competitors.
Take Action Before Seasonal Capacity Closes:
1. Contact our Sourcing Team TODAY to receive your free, customized Pro List for wholesale fashion sunglasses China.
2. Validate supplier readiness for Q4 2026 production runs – including pre-confirmed capacity at Tier-1 factories.
3. Reduce sourcing cycle time by 67% while eliminating quality/compliance failures.
→ Immediate Next Steps:
📧 Email: [email protected]
💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Include “FASHION SUNGLASSES PRO LIST 2026” in your subject line for priority processing.
Limited Verified Capacity Alert: Only 37 Pro List suppliers currently accept new Q4 2026 orders. First-come priority applies.
Why Act Now?
Procurement leaders using SourcifyChina’s Pro List in 2025 achieved 22.4% lower total landed costs and 99.1% on-time delivery – outperforming industry benchmarks by 34%. Don’t navigate China’s complex supplier landscape alone. Our data-driven verification is your insurance against cost overruns and supply chain disruption.
Optimize. Verify. Procure.
SourcifyChina: Where Strategic Sourcing Meets Certainty
© 2026 SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants | All Data Validated per ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Standards
Unsubscribe: [email protected] | Report misuse to [email protected]
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
