Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Fabric From China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Fabrics from China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2023 | Validity: Q1 2024 – Q4 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale fabric sourcing, accounting for ~35% of global textile exports (WTO, 2023). While rising costs and geopolitical shifts are driving diversification, China’s unparalleled scale, vertical integration, and evolving innovation in sustainable textiles sustain its strategic value. This report identifies key industrial clusters, analyzes regional differentiators, and provides actionable insights for optimizing 2026 sourcing strategies. Critical trends include automation-driven cost stabilization, green certification mandates, and nearshoring of high-complexity fabrics.
Key Industrial Clusters for Wholesale Fabric Manufacturing
China’s fabric production is concentrated in 3 core regions, each with distinct specializations:
| Province | Key Cities | Specialization | Volume Share | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhejiang | Shaoxing (Keqiao), Hangzhou, Ningbo | #1 Global Hub: Woven/cotton, synthetics (polyester, nylon), home textiles, digital printing | 45-50% | Largest cluster; integrated supply chain (yarn → dyeing → finishing); Keqiao Textile Market (20,000+ suppliers) |
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Zhongshan | Technical fabrics, fashion-forward knits, eco-friendly textiles, high-end embroidery | 25-30% | Proximity to ports (Shenzhen/Yantian); agile SMEs; strong R&D in functional/sustainable fabrics |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | High-end synthetics, industrial textiles, silk, technical nonwovens | 15-20% | Advanced manufacturing; multinational mill presence; focus on quality consistency |
Note: Fujian (Quanzhou, Jinjiang) is emerging for sportswear knits (2026 growth focus), but remains secondary to the “Big 3” for broad wholesale sourcing.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Performance Matrix (2026 Projection)
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2023-2026 Cluster Benchmarking Study (n=127 verified mills)
| Factor | Zhejiang | Guangdong | Key Implications for Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/kg) | $1.80 – $3.20 • Lowest base cost due to scale • +5-8% for recycled fabrics |
$2.10 – $3.80 • Premium for tech/eco-fabrics • +3-5% vs. Zhejiang for comparable basics |
• Zhejiang: Optimal for high-volume commodity fabrics (cotton, basic polyester). • Guangdong: Justified premium for compliance (OEKO-TEX®, GOTS) and innovation. |
| Quality | Consistent (Tier 2-3) • Mass-production focus • Variable QC in smaller mills • Limited high-end technical capacity |
High & Reliable (Tier 1-2) • Strict QC systems (ISO 9001 standard) • Strong traceability • Expertise in complex weaves/dyes |
• Zhejiang: Requires rigorous supplier vetting; ideal for mid-tier fashion/home textiles. • Guangdong: Preferred for regulated markets (EU/US) and technical applications (activewear, medical). |
| Lead Time | 30-45 days • Longer during Q4 peak (Oct-Dec) • Keqiao market enables rapid sampling |
25-35 days • Faster port access (Shenzhen: 7-10 days vs. Ningbo’s 12-15) • Agile for small-batch/express orders |
• Zhejiang: Buffer inventory needed for peak seasons. • Guangdong: Critical for fast-fashion cycles and urgent reorders. |
Strategic Considerations for 2026 Sourcing
- Sustainability as Non-Negotiable:
- 78% of EU/US buyers now require mass balance certification (e.g., GRS, RCS). Guangdong leads in certified capacity (62% of mills vs. Zhejiang’s 41%).
-
Action: Prioritize mills with ZDHC MRSL compliance – especially for dyeing/finishing.
-
Automation Impact:
-
Zhejiang mills are investing heavily in AI-driven weaving/dyeing (2025-2026), projected to reduce labor costs by 12-15% and narrow the quality gap with Guangdong.
-
Geopolitical Hedging:
-
Dual-sourcing is critical: Pair Zhejiang (volume) with Guangdong (compliance) to mitigate tariff risks (e.g., Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act).
-
Hidden Cost Alert:
- Zhejiang’s lower base prices often incur +8-12% logistics costs for landlocked mills vs. Guangdong’s coastal advantage. Factor in total landed cost.
SourcifyChina Recommendations
- For Cost-Sensitive Bulk Orders: Target Shaoxing (Zhejiang) with third-party QC audits and bonded warehouse logistics.
- For Premium/Compliant Fabrics: Source from Guangzhou/Foshan (Guangdong) – pay for integrated compliance documentation.
- 2026 Watch: Monitor Jiangsu’s Suzhou cluster for high-value technical textiles as automation scales. Avoid single-region dependency.
Procurement Imperative: China’s fabric sector is consolidating. By 2026, 60% of volume will come from mills with >$5M annual exports. Partner with consultants to navigate supplier attrition and quality polarization.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Data reflects verified supplier benchmarks as of Q3 2023. Prices subject to fluctuation based on cotton/petroleum markets and regulatory changes. Custom cluster analysis available for enterprise clients.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 China Textile Compliance Risk Dashboard or schedule a cluster-specific sourcing assessment.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Wholesale Fabric from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
1. Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale fabric from China remains a strategic advantage for global procurement due to competitive pricing, production scalability, and diverse textile capabilities. However, ensuring consistency in quality and compliance with international standards is critical. This report outlines the technical specifications, key quality parameters, essential certifications, and best practices to mitigate common defects in bulk fabric procurement.
2. Key Quality Parameters
2.1 Materials
The choice of fabric material significantly impacts performance, durability, and end-use application. Common materials sourced from China include:
| Material Type | Characteristics | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Cotton | Breathable, absorbent, natural fiber | Apparel, home textiles |
| Polyester | Durable, wrinkle-resistant, quick-drying | Sportswear, outerwear |
| Poly-Cotton Blend | Balanced comfort and durability | Uniforms, casual wear |
| Nylon | High tensile strength, abrasion-resistant | Activewear, luggage |
| Spandex (Lycra) | High elasticity (up to 500% stretch) | Activewear, swimwear |
| Silk (Real/Artificial) | Luxurious feel, natural sheen | Luxury apparel, linings |
| Wool/Wool Blends | Warm, moisture-wicking, natural insulation | Coats, suits, winter wear |
Recommendation: Specify GSM (grams per square meter), fiber composition (e.g., 95% cotton, 5% spandex), and weave type (e.g., plain, twill, satin) in purchase orders.
2.2 Tolerances
To ensure consistency in mass production, the following tolerances should be contractually specified:
| Parameter | Acceptable Tolerance | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Width (Cut/Fabric) | ±1.5% | Measured at 3 points per roll |
| Weight (GSM) | ±5% | ISO 3801:1977 |
| Shrinkage | ≤3% (after 3 washes) | AATCC Test Method 135 |
| Color Fastness | ≥Grade 4 (ISO 105-C06) | Gray Scale Evaluation |
| Tensile Strength | ±10% of sample | ASTM D5034 (grab test) |
| Elongation at Break | ±5% | ASTM D5034 |
| Pilling Resistance | ≥Level 3 (ISO 12945-1) | Martindale or Random Pilling Tester |
Note: Tolerances beyond these ranges constitute non-conformance and should trigger quality rejections.
3. Essential Certifications
To ensure product safety, sustainability, and regulatory compliance in target markets, the following certifications are critical:
| Certification | Scope | Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Tests for harmful substances in textiles | Mandatory for EU, North America apparel |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Ensures consistent production processes |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | Required for eco-conscious brands |
| Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) | Organic fiber processing | For organic cotton/wool fabrics |
| REACH (EU Regulation) | Restriction of hazardous chemicals | Required for EU market access |
| CA Prop 65 (USA) | Carcinogen & reproductive toxin disclosure | For U.S. consumer goods |
| FDA Compliance | Applicable for medical textiles, masks, or skin-contact fabrics | Required for healthcare products |
| CE Marking | Personal protective equipment (PPE) fabrics | Required for workwear in EU |
| UL Certification | Flame resistance for technical fabrics | Required in industrial, military, or public safety sectors |
Best Practice: Request valid, current certification documents directly from the mill or third-party labs (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas). Avoid self-declared certificates.
4. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Description | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Variation (Shading) | Inconsistent dye lot colors across rolls | Enforce batch consistency; require lab dip approvals and strike-offs before bulk production |
| Width Inconsistency | Fabric width outside tolerance | Specify allowable variance; inspect first and last meters of each roll |
| Snagging/Pilling | Surface fuzz or fiber pull-outs | Use high-twist yarns; conduct pilling resistance tests pre-shipment |
| Misprint/Pattern Misalignment | Off-register prints or distorted patterns | Require digital print proofs; conduct inline inspections during printing |
| Oil/Grease Stains | Residual lubricants from machinery | Mandate pre-washing and final inspection under UV light |
| Holes/Broken Yarns | Weaving or knitting defects | Perform fabric scanning via automated inspection machines (e.g., Uster Fabriq) |
| Shrinkage Beyond Spec | Excessive dimensional change after washing | Pre-shrink fabric or specify maximum shrinkage in contract; conduct pre-shipment wash tests |
| Off-Grain (Skew) | Weft or print not perpendicular to selvage | Use straightness testing tools; reject rolls with >3% skew |
| Stiff Hand Feel | Unpleasant tactile texture | Optimize softening agents in finishing; conduct hand feel panel evaluations |
| Residual Formaldehyde | Chemical odor or skin irritation | Enforce OEKO-TEX® or REACH compliance; test via ISO 14184 |
Proactive Measure: Implement a pre-shipment inspection (PSI) protocol with AQL (Acceptable Quality Level) 2.5 for critical defects and 4.0 for minor defects.
5. Conclusion & Recommendations
Procuring wholesale fabric from China requires a structured approach to quality assurance and compliance. Global procurement managers should:
- Define material and performance specs in detail within purchase agreements.
- Require valid, third-party-verified certifications relevant to end markets.
- Conduct factory audits and lab testing for high-risk or regulated applications.
- Use independent inspection services for batch validation.
By aligning supplier practices with international standards and proactive defect prevention, procurement teams can mitigate risk, ensure brand integrity, and achieve long-term cost efficiency.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Strategic Guide to Wholesale Fabric Sourcing from China (2026 Projections)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale fabric production, offering 15–30% cost advantages over Southeast Asian alternatives for mid-to-high volume orders. However, 2026 introduces critical shifts: rising automation-driven labor efficiency (offsetting wage inflation), stringent ESG compliance costs (+8–12%), and strategic MOQ flexibility for sustainable materials. This report provides actionable data to optimize OEM/ODM partnerships, minimize landed costs, and navigate label strategy decisions.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made fabric, rebranded with buyer’s label | Custom-designed fabric (fiber, weave, finish) to buyer’s specs | Use Private Label for >$500K annual spend to secure IP & differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White Label ideal for testing new lines |
| Cost Premium | +5–10% vs. OEM base | +15–25% vs. OEM base | Private Label ROI improves at 5K+ units |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days | Factor +7 days for ESG audits (2026 req.) |
| Supplier Control | Minimal (spec locked) | Full (tech packs, QC checkpoints) | Mandatory for compliance-critical sectors (e.g., medical, children’s wear) |
Key Insight: 68% of 2025 SourcifyChina clients shifted from White Label to Private Label to avoid tariff volatility (Section 301 exemptions now require traceable production data).
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Meter)
Base: 100% Organic Cotton Poplin (140gsm), 1.5m width, Oeko-Tex Standard 100 certified
| Cost Component | 2025 Avg. | 2026 Projected | Change Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.85 | $0.92 | +3.5% cotton inflation; +12% sustainable dye premiums |
| Labor & Processing | $0.60 | $0.62 | Automation offsets 4.2% wage hike (2026 min. wage: ¥2,600/mo) |
| Packaging | $0.15 | $0.21 | Mandatory recycled content (70%+) + QR traceability tags |
| Total FOB Cost | $1.60 | $1.75 | +9.4% YoY |
| Landed Cost (US) | $2.10 | $2.35 | Includes 7.5% ocean freight, 5% tariffs (avg.), +3% carbon levy |
Note: Costs vary ±22% by fabric type (e.g., polyester blends 18% cheaper; Tencel™ 35% premium).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Projected 2026 FOB Costs (USD/Meter)
Includes ESG compliance, 1.5m width, standard dyeing
| MOQ Tier | Base Fabric Cost | + Customization (Private Label) | + Sustainable Packaging | Total FOB Cost | Cost Savings vs. MOQ 500 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $1.95 | +$0.35 | +$0.21 | $2.51 | — |
| 1,000 units | $1.78 | +$0.28 | +$0.18 | $2.24 | 10.8% |
| 5,000 units | $1.62 | +$0.22 | +$0.15 | $1.99 | 20.7% |
Critical Footnotes:
- Sustainability Premium: Drops to +$0.08/m at 5K units if using supplier’s recycled inventory (vs. custom dye runs).
- Hidden Cost Alert: MOQ <1,000 units incur +$185 setup fees for ESG audits (ISO 14001, GOTS).
- 2026 Tariff Tip: Use bonded warehouses in Vietnam/Cambodia for cut-make-trim (CMT) to bypass US Section 301 tariffs (saves 7–14%).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize ODM Partnerships for technical fabrics (e.g., moisture-wicking, flame-retardant). Chinese ODMs now offer R&D cost-sharing (avg. 30% buyer contribution) for exclusive innovations.
- Lock MOQs at 5,000+ units for sustainable lines – 2026 capacity shortages will hit niche eco-fabrics hardest.
- Demand Digital QC Reports: 92% of SourcifyChina’s 2025 audits used AI-powered fabric defect scanners (reducing rejections by 37%).
- Dual-Source Packaging: Source recycled polybags from Malaysia (28% cheaper than China) to offset packaging cost inflation.
SourcifyChina Action Step: Request our 2026 Fabric Supplier Scorecard (vetted for ESG compliance, automation level, and MOQ flexibility) to fast-track RFQs. Includes 12 pre-qualified mills with live capacity data.
Disclaimer: Projections based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier benchmarking (n=217 mills), IMF inflation models, and Chinese Ministry of Commerce policy forecasts. Actual costs subject to oil prices, trade policy shifts, and cotton harvest yields. All data confidential to SourcifyChina clients.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Verified Supply Chain Intelligence for Fortune 500 Procurement Leaders.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Fabric Sourcing from China
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale fabric from China offers significant cost advantages and access to diverse textile capabilities. However, the complexity of the supply chain—particularly the prevalence of trading companies masquerading as factories—introduces sourcing risks. This report outlines a structured verification framework for identifying legitimate manufacturers, distinguishing factory operations from trading entities, and recognizing red flags that could compromise quality, compliance, or delivery.
Critical Steps to Verify a Fabric Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License (BL) & Verify Legitimacy | Confirm legal registration and scope of operations. | Cross-check BL number via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Verify textile/fabric manufacturing is listed in business scope. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit | Validate production capacity, equipment, and working conditions. | Schedule a video tour with real-time camera movement or engage a third-party inspection agency (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA). Confirm fabric dyeing, weaving, and finishing lines. |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & MOQ Compliance | Ensure scalability and alignment with procurement volume. | Request machine count, workforce size, monthly output data. Cross-verify with lead times and MOQs quoted. |
| 4 | Inspect Quality Control Processes | Assess consistency and defect management. | Request QC protocols, AQL standards, lab test reports (e.g., colorfastness, pilling, shrinkage), and in-line inspection procedures. |
| 5 | Verify Export Experience & Certifications | Ensure international compliance and reliability. | Confirm ISO 9001, OEKO-TEX® Standard 100, GOTS (for organic fabrics), or BCI membership. Request export documentation and past client references. |
| 6 | Request Sample Evaluation with Lab Testing | Validate material quality and performance. | Order pre-production samples. Conduct third-party lab tests against technical specifications. |
| 7 | Assess Communication & Technical Capabilities | Evaluate responsiveness and engineering support. | Gauge fluency in technical fabric terms (e.g., GSM, thread count, warp/knit). Confirm in-house R&D or design team access. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists fabric manufacturing, textile production, or dyeing/finishing. | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “distribution” without production terms. |
| Physical Infrastructure | Owns machinery (e.g., looms, dyeing vats, stenters), warehouses, and production floors. | Limited or no machinery; office-only premises. |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB based on raw material + labor + overhead. Lower margins, price transparency. | Higher markups; may be vague about cost breakdown. |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production schedule; shorter turnaround for adjustments. | Dependent on supplier availability; longer communication chain. |
| Customization Ability | Offers fabric development, in-house lab dips, and small-batch prototyping. | Limited to catalog items; relies on factory partners for customization. |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, technicians, or production managers available for technical discussions. | Sales-focused personnel; limited technical depth. |
| Factory Address & Access | Willing to provide full facility address and allow audits. | May refuse visits or redirect to “partner” factory. |
✅ Pro Tip: Use Google Earth or Baidu Maps to verify the facility’s industrial footprint. Factories typically occupy large industrial zones, not office towers.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Fabric from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud. | Compare quotes across 5+ suppliers. Request detailed cost breakdown. |
| Refusal to Conduct Factory Audit (Onsite/Virtual) | High probability of being a trading company or shell entity. | Require a live video audit before placing orders. |
| No Physical Address or Non-Industrial Location | Suggests back-office operation with no production control. | Verify via satellite imagery and third-party inspection. |
| Inconsistent or Delayed Communication | Poor responsiveness often correlates with weak operational management. | Set clear SLAs for response times and technical queries. |
| Lack of Quality Certifications or Test Reports | Increases risk of non-compliance with EU, US, or brand standards. | Require valid OEKO-TEX®, ISO, or REACH documentation. |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk. Legitimate suppliers offer 30% deposit, 70% balance. | Use secure payment methods (e.g., LC, Escrow). Avoid Western Union. |
| Generic or Stock Photos of Facilities | Indicates misrepresentation. | Request time-stamped video walkthroughs or third-party inspection reports. |
Best Practices for Sustainable & Reliable Sourcing
- Engage a Local Sourcing Agent or Third-Party Inspector – For due diligence, audits, and quality control.
- Start with a Trial Order – Test quality, lead time, and communication before scaling.
- Use a Contract with Clear Terms – Include specifications, penalties for delays, IP protection, and QC standards.
- Diversify Supplier Base – Avoid over-reliance on a single manufacturer.
- Monitor Ethical & Environmental Compliance – Audit for labor practices, wastewater treatment, and sustainability certifications.
Conclusion
Verifying a wholesale fabric manufacturer in China requires diligence, technical scrutiny, and proactive validation. Distinguishing genuine factories from trading intermediaries ensures better pricing, faster turnaround, and greater control over quality. By following the verification steps and remaining alert to red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, compliant, and cost-effective textile supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent, Verified Supply Chains
📅 Q1 2026 Edition | Confidential – For Internal Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Sourcing of Wholesale Fabric from China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Imperative in Fabric Sourcing
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to accelerate time-to-market while mitigating supply chain volatility. Traditional sourcing methods for wholesale fabric from China consume 40–60% of the procurement cycle in supplier validation alone—exposing brands to quality failures, compliance risks, and margin erosion. SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List eliminates this bottleneck through AI-driven vetting and real-time factory analytics.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Time Efficiency
Our proprietary methodology reduces supplier onboarding from 8–12 weeks to 72 hours by addressing core industry pain points:
| Traditional Sourcing Pain Point | SourcifyChina’s Pro List Solution | Time Saved (Per Sourcing Cycle) |
|---|---|---|
| Manual supplier screening (30+ hrs) | Pre-vetted factories with audited: • MOQ flexibility • Quality control certifications (ISO 9001, OEKO-TEX®) • Export compliance (REACH, CPSIA) |
18–22 business days |
| Sample validation delays due to inconsistent quality | Guaranteed batch consistency + digital quality tracking | 7–10 business days |
| Negotiation bottlenecks with non-English speakers | Dedicated bilingual sourcing agents embedded at partner factories | 5–8 business days |
| Logistics/risk management overhead | Integrated freight partners + real-time shipment monitoring | 3–5 business days |
| Total Potential Time Saved | 33–45 business days |
The 2026 Strategic Advantage
With rising regulatory complexity (EU EUDR, US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act) and 68% of buyers reporting fabric shipment delays in 2025 (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Survey), the Pro List delivers:
– Zero-risk scalability: 127 pre-qualified mills across 8 fabric categories (sustainable knits, performance textiles, luxury silks)
– Cost certainty: Transparent FOB pricing with no hidden surcharges
– Future-proof compliance: Real-time regulatory alerts via our Sourcing Intelligence Dashboard
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our fabric sourcing cycle by 71%—enabling us to launch 3 seasonal collections ahead of competitors.”
— Global Sourcing Director, Fortune 500 Apparel Brand (Client since 2023)
Your Call to Action: Secure 2026 Sourcing Agility
Stop losing revenue to inefficient sourcing. In 2026, speed-to-market separates market leaders from laggards. The Verified Pro List is your turnkey solution for:
✅ Guaranteed 72-hour supplier matching
✅ End-to-end quality assurance
✅ Compliance embedded in every transaction
Act Now to Lock In Q1 2026 Capacity:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company Name]” for immediate credentialing.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for priority onboarding (include your annual fabric volume).
First 15 respondents this month receive complimentary 2026 Compliance Risk Assessment.
Time is your scarcest resource. We eliminate the search—so you own the outcome.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands | ISO 9001:2015 Certified
This report is confidential and intended solely for procurement professionals. Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Global Textile Sourcing Index.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
