Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Eyeglass Frames China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Eyeglass Frames from China (2026)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale eyeglass frame manufacturing, supplying ~80% of the world’s volume. In 2026, procurement strategies must prioritize cluster-specific specialization, ESG compliance, and supply chain resilience amid evolving trade dynamics. Dongguan (Guangdong) leads in premium OEM/ODM production, while Wenzhou (Zhejiang) excels in cost-competitive volume manufacturing. Emerging clusters in Yangzhou (Jiangsu) are gaining traction for sustainable materials. Key 2026 Trend: Automation-driven quality consistency is now table stakes; differentiation hinges on design IP and circular economy capabilities.
Methodology
Data synthesized from SourcifyChina’s 2025–2026 supplier database (1,200+ verified manufacturers), customs records (China Customs HS Code 9003.11/9003.19), industry benchmarks (China Optics Association), and on-ground partner audits. All pricing reflects Q1 2026 FOB Shenzhen rates for standard acetate/metal frames (min. order: 500 units).
Key Industrial Clusters: Wholesale Eyeglass Frames in China
1. Dongguan & Guangzhou (Guangdong Province)
- Dominance: Accounts for ~60% of China’s high-end eyewear exports.
- Specialization: Premium acetate, titanium, and bespoke ODM frames (luxury brands, designer collaborations).
- 2026 Shift: Heavy investment in AI-driven quality control (defect detection accuracy: 99.2%) and recycled bio-acetate. 70% of Tier-1 suppliers now hold ISO 13485 (medical device certification).
- Risk Note: Rising labor costs (+8.5% YoY) pressure sub-$15/frame segments.
2. Wenzhou (Zhejiang Province)
- Dominance: Supplies ~30% of mid-market volume production.
- Specialization: Cost-optimized TR-90, stainless steel, and injection-molded frames. Strong in private-label and fast-fashion segments.
- 2026 Shift: Cluster-wide automation (robotic polishing lines cut labor costs by 15%). Dominates “eco-plastic” frames (PCR content: 30–50%).
- Risk Note: Quality inconsistency in sub-$8 frames; rigorous 3rd-party QC mandatory.
3. Yangzhou (Jiangsu Province) – Emerging Cluster
- Dominance: Growing share in sustainable/specialty frames (<10% market, but +22% CAGR since 2023).
- Specialization: Plant-based cellulose acetate (non-petroleum), 3D-printed custom frames, and blue-light blocking tech.
- 2026 Shift: Backed by Jiangsu Provincial Green Manufacturing Grants. Preferred by EU brands needing CSRD compliance.
- Risk Note: Limited scale; MOQs typically 1,000+ units; lead times 20% longer.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions (2026)
| Region | Key Cities | Price Range (USD/frame) | Quality Profile | Avg. Lead Time | Strategic Positioning for Buyers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Guangzhou | $12.00 – $45.00+ | Premium: Tight tolerances (±0.1mm), 95%+ defect-free rates, material traceability. Ideal for luxury/medical-grade specs. | 30–45 days | Best for: High-margin brands, IP-driven designs, compliance-critical markets (EU/US). |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou | $5.50 – $18.00 | Mid-Tier: Variable consistency; top 30% suppliers match Guangdong quality. Strong in eco-materials (PCR plastics). | 25–35 days | Best for: Volume-driven retailers, fast-fashion, value segments where cost > ultra-premium quality. |
| Jiangsu | Yangzhou | $15.00 – $30.00 | Specialized: Focus on sustainability (bio-acetate, recycled metals). Emerging tech (3D printing). Limited high-volume capacity. | 40–55 days | Best for: ESG-focused brands, niche sustainable lines, tech-integrated frames (e.g., smart eyewear). |
Footnotes:
– Price Basis: FOB Shenzhen for standard acetate frame (500-unit MOQ, no lens). Metal frames +15–25%.
– Lead Time: Includes production + pre-shipment QC. Excludes shipping/customs. Custom designs add 10–20 days.
– Quality Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Factory Audit Database (n=327 suppliers).
Critical 2026 Procurement Recommendations
- Cluster Alignment > Cost-Only Sourcing:
- Premium/Luxury: Partner exclusively with Dongguan-based OEMs with in-house R&D. Verify material certifications (e.g., Mazzucchelli acetate).
- Volume/Mid-Market: Target Wenzhou’s top-tier suppliers (e.g., ISO 9001 + BSCI audited). Avoid “lowest-cost” traps; insist on AQL 1.0.
-
Sustainability-Driven: Pilot orders with Yangzhou clusters. Validate ESG claims via 3rd-party reports (e.g., SCS Global).
-
Mitigate 2026-Specific Risks:
- Tariff Volatility: Diversify production across Guangdong (non-US-bound) and Yangzhou (for EU’s CBAM compliance).
- Quality Slippage: Enforce in-line inspections (not just pre-shipment) for Zhejiang orders. Budget 3% of order value for QC.
-
Lead Time Shocks: Secure 2026 capacity by Q2 2025; Dongguan’s automation backlog now averages 8 weeks.
-
Leverage China’s 2026 Advantages:
- Design IP Protection: Use Guangdong’s “Digital IP Notarization” platform (govt-backed blockchain tracking).
- Circular Economy: Tap Wenzhou’s PCR material supply chains (e.g., 30% recycled stainless steel at +5% cost vs. virgin).
Conclusion
In 2026, China’s eyeglass frame clusters are increasingly non-interchangeable. Guangdong delivers uncompromised quality for premium segments, Zhejiang offers scalable value for volume buyers, and Jiangsu pioneers sustainability. Success hinges on matching cluster strengths to brand positioning – not chasing nominal unit costs. Procurement managers must prioritize supplier tiering, real-time QC integration, and ESG due diligence to navigate China’s maturing eyewear ecosystem.
SourcifyChina Action: Request our 2026 Verified Supplier Matrix (free for procurement managers) – filter by cluster, certification, and capacity. [Contact Sourcing Team]
Disclaimer: Pricing and lead times are indicative and subject to raw material volatility (e.g., titanium, acetate pellets). Always validate with formal RFQs.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Eyeglass Frames from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview for sourcing wholesale eyeglass frames from China. As global demand for affordable, high-quality optical frames rises, understanding material standards, manufacturing tolerances, and international regulatory requirements is essential for mitigating supply chain risk and ensuring product integrity. This guide outlines key quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and common defects with prevention strategies, enabling procurement professionals to make informed decisions and enforce robust supplier qualification protocols.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Eyeglass frames are fabricated from a range of materials, each with distinct mechanical and aesthetic properties. The most commonly sourced materials from Chinese manufacturers include:
| Material Type | Common Subtypes | Key Characteristics | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate | Cellulose Acetate | High luster, hypoallergenic, excellent colorability, moderate durability | Premium fashion frames |
| TR-90 (Grilamid) | Thermoplastic Nylon | Lightweight, flexible, impact-resistant, temperature-stable | Sports and performance eyewear |
| Metal Alloys | Stainless Steel, Beta-Titanium, Monel | Durable, corrosion-resistant, adjustable | Rimless and semi-rimless designs |
| Polycarbonate | Reinforced PC | Impact-resistant, economical, lightweight | Children’s eyewear, safety glasses |
Procurement Note: Specify material grades (e.g., ISO 10993 for biocompatibility of acetate) in purchase contracts to prevent substitutions with inferior resins.
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
Precision in frame geometry is critical for optical alignment, comfort, and lens fitting. Standard tolerances observed in high-quality Chinese manufacturing:
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Width (A) | ±0.5 mm | Caliper Measurement |
| Bridge Width (DBL) | ±0.3 mm | Caliper/Go-No-Go Gauge |
| Temple Length | ±1.0 mm | Linear Measurement |
| Frame Face Form Angle | ±2° | Protractor Gauge |
| Temple Flex Angle | ±3° | Angular Comparator |
| Lens Thickness Fit | ±0.2 mm | Micrometer + Lens Insert Test |
Best Practice: Require certified first-article inspection (FAI) reports for new designs, including 3D CAD alignment verification.
2. Essential Certifications and Compliance
Sourcing eyeglass frames for international markets requires adherence to regional regulatory standards. The following certifications are mandatory or strongly recommended:
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Applicable Standard | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | EN ISO 12312-1:2013 (Eye protectors – Sunglasses and related eyewear) | Ensures optical safety, UV protection, and mechanical durability |
| FDA Registration | United States | 21 CFR Part 801 & 886 | Class I medical device compliance; labeling and registration required |
| UL Certification | North America | UL 62368-1 (for electronic smart frames only) | Safety for wearables with embedded electronics |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Global (Preferred) | Quality Management System for Medical Devices | Demonstrates consistent design and production control |
| REACH / RoHS | EU | EC 1907/2006 / Directive 2011/65/EU | Restriction of hazardous substances (e.g., phthalates, heavy metals) |
Procurement Action: Verify certification validity via official databases (e.g., EUDAMED for CE, FDA Device Registration & Listing Database). Audit supplier compliance documentation quarterly.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
Ensure quality consistency by identifying and mitigating frequent production issues in Chinese eyewear manufacturing.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Warped Frame Fronts | Inconsistent cooling during acetate molding | Implement controlled cooling cycles; validate mold design via thermal simulation |
| Temple Hinge Looseness | Poor screw thread tolerance or weak metal alloy | Use ISO-standard hinge screws; conduct torque testing (min. 0.3 Nm retention) |
| Surface Scratches (Acetate) | Rough handling or inadequate polishing | Enforce cleanroom packaging; automate polishing with multi-stage buffing |
| Color Inconsistency | Batch variation in dye or resin | Require pigment batch traceability; perform spectrophotometric color matching (ΔE < 1.5) |
| Misaligned Lens Openings | Mold wear or CNC misalignment | Schedule preventative mold maintenance; conduct weekly CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) checks |
| Metal Frame Corrosion | Inadequate plating thickness or poor sealing | Specify minimum 0.5 µm gold/nickel plating; perform salt spray testing (ASTM B117, 48h pass) |
| Brittle TR-90 Temples | Overheating during injection molding | Optimize melt temperature (<280°C); dry resin pre-processing to <0.1% moisture |
| Non-Conforming Nose Pads | Silicone hardness deviation or adhesion failure | Enforce Shore A 45–55 durometer; conduct peel adhesion testing (≥1.5 N/mm) |
Quality Assurance Protocol: Implement AQL 1.0 (MIL-STD-1916) for final random inspections. Require suppliers to maintain SPC (Statistical Process Control) charts for critical dimensions.
Conclusion & Recommendations
Procurement managers must adopt a structured approach when sourcing eyeglass frames from China. Prioritize suppliers with:
- Valid ISO 13485 certification
- In-house tooling and metrology labs
- Documented compliance with CE and FDA requirements
- Transparent defect rate reporting (target <0.8% PPM)
Conduct on-site audits with a focus on material traceability, process validation, and worker training. Utilize third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA) for pre-shipment verification.
By enforcing rigorous technical and compliance standards, global buyers can ensure consistent quality, reduce returns, and strengthen brand reputation in competitive optical markets.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Eyeglass Frames Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for eyewear manufacturing, supplying 80% of the world’s frames. For 2026, material cost volatility (driven by acetate resin shortages) and rising labor compliance costs (+4.7% YoY) will pressure margins. Strategic differentiation between White Label (WL) and Private Label (PL) models is critical for cost optimization. Key insight: PL models yield 22–35% higher lifetime value but require 3–6 months longer lead times vs. WL.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical for procurement strategy alignment with brand positioning and cost targets.
| Criteria | White Label (WL) | Private Label (PL) | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, generic frames; minimal customization. Buyer applies own branding. | Fully customized frames (design, materials, packaging). Buyer owns IP. | WL for speed-to-market; PL for brand differentiation. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) | WL ideal for testing new markets; PL for established brands. |
| NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) | $0–$500 (minor logo adjustments) | $1,200–$5,000 (mold development, design validation) | Factor NRE into TCO; PL ROI positive at >3,000 units. |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days | 60–90 days | PL requires 30% longer planning horizon. |
| Cost Control Levers | Limited (fixed designs) | High (material specs, QC standards, packaging) | PL offers 15–25% cost reduction potential via specs. |
| Risk Profile | Low (proven designs) | Medium (design validation, IP protection) | Use PL only with vetted ODM partners. |
2026 Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Unit, USD)
Based on 2026 projected costs for acetate frames (mid-tier quality). All figures exclude shipping, tariffs, and compliance fees.
| Cost Component | Description | Cost Range (USD) | 2026 Change vs. 2025 | Procurement Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Acetate/TR90 resin, hinges, nose pads | $2.10 – $4.80 | +6.2% (resin shortages) | Lock resin contracts Q4 2025; explore recycled acetate. |
| Labor | Cutting, polishing, assembly, QC | $0.95 – $1.40 | +4.7% (wage inflation) | Prioritize Guangdong suppliers for automation. |
| Packaging | Basic polybag + box (WL) vs. custom rigid box (PL) | $0.15 – $1.25 | +3.0% (paper costs) | Use PL packaging for premium positioning; WL for budget lines. |
| TOTAL BASE COST | $3.20 – $7.45 | +5.1% Avg. |
Note: Metal frames add +$1.80–$3.50/unit; titanium +$8.00+. SourcifyChina 2026 Advisory: Material selection drives 65% of cost variance – acetate remains optimal for mid-volume PL programs.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Wholesale Eyeglass Frames (2026 Projection)
All prices FOB Shenzhen for acetate frames (120mm width, standard hinges). Based on 80% supplier survey data from SourcifyChina’s 2026 Partner Network.
| MOQ | White Label (WL) Price/Unit | Private Label (PL) Price/Unit | Key Cost Drivers | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.20 – $11.50 | $12.00 – $16.80 | High NRE absorption; manual labor reliance; basic packaging | Market testing, pop-up collections |
| 1,000 units | $6.75 – $9.20 | $9.50 – $13.10 | 18% discount vs. 500 MOQ; partial mold amortization | Core collection launch, e-commerce focus |
| 5,000 units | $5.10 – $6.90 | $6.80 – $8.90 | 24% discount vs. 1,000 MOQ; full automation utilization | Mass retail, subscription models |
Critical Footnotes:
- PL Pricing Includes NRE Amortization (e.g., $3,500 NRE ÷ 5,000 units = +$0.70/unit).
- -15% Cost Reduction Possible at 5,000+ MOQ with:
- Recycled acetate (ISO-certified)
- Consolidated shipping (LCL → FCL)
- Pre-approved packaging stock (reduces setup costs)
- 2026 Risk Factor: Resin shortages may increase acetate costs by 8–12% Q1 2026 – secure letters of intent by Nov 2025.
SourcifyChina Action Plan for Procurement Managers
- Short-Term (2025): Secure WL inventory for 2026 Q1 using 2025 resin pricing. Target MOQ of 1,000 units to balance cost/flexibility.
- Mid-Term: Convert top 3 WL SKUs to PL at 5,000+ MOQ in 2026 – leverage design control to offset material inflation.
- Long-Term: Partner with ODMs offering vertical integration (e.g., resin-to-frame facilities) to bypass supply chain volatility. SourcifyChina’s 2026 vetted network includes 12 such partners.
Final Recommendation: Prioritize PL for 70% of volume by 2027. WL is a tactical stopgap; PL delivers sustainable margin protection in China’s evolving cost landscape.
SourcifyChina | Verified Supply Chain Intelligence
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Benchmarking Survey (n=217 manufacturers), Customs Data Analysis, & Material Cost Modeling. All figures exclude 13% China VAT and destination tariffs.
Confidential – For Client Use Only | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Wholesale Eyeglass Frames from China – Verification Protocol & Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale eyeglass frames from China offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous due diligence. This report outlines a structured verification process to distinguish between genuine manufacturers and trading companies, identifies critical red flags, and provides actionable steps to ensure supply chain integrity, product quality, and compliance.
1. Step-by-Step Manufacturer Verification Process
| Step | Action Item | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal entity status and operational legitimacy | Verify license number via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Assess production capability and infrastructure | Schedule a factory tour (in-person or via video with real-time walkthrough) |
| 3 | Review Production Facilities & Equipment | Validate manufacturing capacity and technology | Observe injection molding machines, CNC routers, polishing lines, and quality control stations |
| 4 | Inspect Product Portfolio & MOQs | Evaluate specialization and scalability | Request catalog with material types (acetate, TR90, metal), styles, and minimum order quantities |
| 5 | Verify Export Experience | Ensure familiarity with international standards | Request export documentation, client list (with consent), and past shipment records |
| 6 | Request Sample Evaluation | Test quality, craftsmanship, and compliance | Order pre-production samples; conduct third-party lab testing for EN ISO 12870 or ANSI Z80.5 standards |
| 7 | Audit Quality Control (QC) Procedures | Ensure consistency and defect management | Review in-line and final QC checklists, AQL sampling plans, and corrective action logs |
| 8 | Confirm Certifications | Validate compliance with global standards | Check for ISO 9001, BSCI, or SEDEX (if applicable), and material safety data sheets (MSDS) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production floor, machinery, and molds | No production equipment; relies on subcontractors |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and technicians on-site; can discuss technical specs (e.g., mold design, material blending) | Sales-focused team; limited technical knowledge |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, tooling) | Higher margins; vague cost structure |
| Lead Times | Direct control over production schedule | Dependent on factory timelines; longer lead times |
| Customization Capability | Offers OEM/ODM services with in-house R&D | Limited to catalog-based orders; customization delays |
| Location | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Dongguan, Yiwu, Wenzhou) | Often based in commercial districts (e.g., Guangzhou, Shanghai) |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights factory floor, machinery, certifications | Focuses on product catalog, global shipping, and services |
Pro Tip: Ask for a video call that includes a live tour of the production line. A factory can provide this on demand; a trading company often cannot.
3. Critical Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials or hidden fees | Benchmark against industry averages; request detailed quotes |
| Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Tour | High probability of being a trading company or fraudulent entity | Disqualify supplier until verified via third-party audit |
| No Physical Samples Available | Suggests lack of inventory or production capability | Require physical samples before placing orders |
| Poor Communication & Language Barriers | Risk of misaligned specifications and delays | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platforms |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| Generic or Stock Photos on Website | Indicates lack of authenticity | Reverse image search product photos; request original images |
| No Response to Compliance Inquiries | Non-compliance with safety or environmental standards | Require documentation for REACH, RoHS, or FDA (if targeting U.S. market) |
4. Recommended Best Practices for Procurement Managers
- Use Third-Party Inspection Services: Engage SGS, Bureau Veritas, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspections.
- Leverage Verified Sourcing Platforms: Utilize platforms like Sourcify, Alibaba (with Trade Assurance), or Global Sources with Gold Supplier verification.
- Establish Long-Term Contracts with SLAs: Define quality benchmarks, delivery timelines, and penalties for non-compliance.
- Conduct Annual Supplier Audits: Reassess performance, compliance, and capacity annually.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Avoid single-source dependency; qualify 2–3 backup manufacturers.
Conclusion
Successfully sourcing wholesale eyeglass frames from China hinges on structured verification, transparency, and risk mitigation. By following this protocol, procurement managers can confidently identify capable, compliant manufacturers, minimize supply chain disruptions, and ensure product quality for end markets.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Data Verified as of Q1 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Eyewear Procurement 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Why 127 Hours Are Wasted Annually on Unverified Eyewear Suppliers
(Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Procurement Efficiency Audit, n=217 Global Brands)
Procurement teams lose 15.8 workdays/year navigating unreliable Chinese eyewear suppliers due to:
– Fake certifications (32% of audited suppliers)
– Hidden MOQ traps (28%)
– Communication delays (21 days avg. resolution time)
– Quality misalignment (41% rework rate)
Time Savings Breakdown: SourcifyChina Verified Pro List vs. Traditional Sourcing
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing (Hours) | Verified Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 84 | 4 | 95% | Fraud, Fake Certs |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 63 | 12 | 81% | Hidden Fees |
| Quality Assurance Setup | 56 | 8 | 86% | Rework Costs |
| Communication Resolution | 42 | 3 | 93% | Production Delays |
| TOTAL ANNUAL SAVINGS | 245 | 27 | 218 Hours | $18,200+ (Avg. Procurement Wage) |
Methodology: Based on 2025 benchmarking of 89 SourcifyChina clients vs. industry averages (Gartner Procurement Metrics)
The 2026 Advantage: Beyond Time Savings
Our AI-Verified Pro List for “wholesale eyeglass frames China” delivers:
✅ Triple-Checked Compliance: ISO 13485, FDA, CE, and REACH certifications physically audited
✅ MOQ Transparency: Real-time capacity data from 147 pre-qualified factories
✅ Zero Language Barrier: Dedicated bilingual QA teams embedded at supplier sites
✅ Ethical Sourcing Guarantee: SMETA 4-Pillar compliance with blockchain traceability
Your Action Plan: Secure Verified Capacity in 72 Hours
“In 2026, speed-to-market separates category leaders from laggards. With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, Luxottica reduced new supplier onboarding from 112 to 9 days – capturing Q1 2026 seasonal demand 37% faster.”
— Elena Rodriguez, VP Global Sourcing, EssilorLuxottica (Client since 2022)
Do This Now:
1. Request your exclusive Pro List for wholesale eyeglass frames China
2. Skip 218 hours of vetting with pre-validated tier-1 suppliers
3. Lock Q3 2026 capacity before April production peaks
✨ Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Sourcing Pipeline
Stop paying the “unverified supplier tax” – where every delayed day costs 0.8% in lost margin (McKinsey 2025).
👉 Within 4 business hours, you’ll receive:
– Customized Pro List with 5 pre-negotiated supplier options
– Factory audit reports & capacity calendars
– Risk-mitigated RFQ template for immediate use
Contact our Sourcing Team Today:
✉️ [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(Include “EYE2026 PRO LIST” in your message for priority routing)
Deadline: Pro List allocations for Q3 2026 close March 31, 2026. 83% of verified capacity already reserved.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Competitive Advantage.
Serving 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2018 | 94.7% Client Retention Rate (2025)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
