Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Dress Suppliers China
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Wholesale Dress Suppliers from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Release Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for the production and export of wholesale apparel, with dress manufacturing being one of the most mature and competitive sectors. For procurement managers seeking cost efficiency, scalability, and design flexibility, understanding China’s regional manufacturing clusters is critical to strategic sourcing success. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of key industrial hubs producing wholesale dresses, evaluates regional strengths, and delivers a comparative assessment to guide sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for Wholesale Dress Manufacturing in China
China’s dress manufacturing ecosystem is highly regionalized, with each cluster specializing in distinct segments of the value chain—ranging from mass-market fast fashion to premium ready-to-wear. The primary production hubs are concentrated in the eastern and southern coastal provinces, benefiting from infrastructure, skilled labor, and export logistics.
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Zhongshan)
- Core Hub: Guangzhou (especially the Baiyun and Haizhu districts)
- Specialization: Fast fashion, OEM/ODM services, digital printing, and trend-responsive designs.
- Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, agile supply chains, strong design innovation, and integration with e-commerce platforms (e.g., Alibaba, Pinduoduo).
- Target Markets: North America, Europe, Southeast Asia.
2. Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, Huzhou, Jiaxing, Ningbo)
- Core Hub: Hangzhou (e-commerce capital) and Huzhou (silk and mid-range apparel).
- Specialization: Mid-to-high-quality dresses, silk and natural fiber garments, private label production.
- Strengths: Strong textile heritage, advanced fabric sourcing (e.g., silk from Huzhou), integration with Alibaba’s Cainiao logistics, and sustainable manufacturing adoption.
- Target Markets: EU, Japan, Australia, premium e-tailers (e.g., Zalando, ASOS partners).
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changshu, Nantong)
- Core Hub: Changshu (often called the “Clothing Capital of China”)
- Specialization: Mid-range to high-end dresses, export-oriented production, fabric innovation.
- Strengths: High automation, skilled workforce, proximity to Shanghai port, and strong compliance standards.
- Target Markets: EU, North America, Japan.
4. Fujian Province (Xiamen, Jinjiang, Quanzhou)
- Core Hub: Xiamen (export logistics), Jinjiang (apparel OEMs)
- Specialization: Sport dresses, casualwear, and budget-friendly fashion.
- Strengths: Cost-effective labor, strong OEM networks, and proximity to Taiwan supply chains.
- Target Markets: Southeast Asia, Middle East, budget retailers.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for Dress Manufacturing
The table below evaluates the top four provinces based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Tier, and Average Lead Time. Ratings are on a 5-point scale (1 = lowest, 5 = highest), based on 2025–2026 industry benchmarks and SourcifyChina’s supplier audits.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Tier | Average Lead Time (from PO to FOB) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4.2 | 3.8 | 25–35 days | Fast fashion, trend replication, e-commerce brands, small to mid MOQs |
| Zhejiang | 3.7 | 4.4 | 30–40 days | Mid-to-premium quality, sustainable lines, private label, fabric-forward designs |
| Jiangsu | 3.5 | 4.6 | 30–45 days | High compliance, export-grade quality, brand partnerships, larger MOQs |
| Fujian | 4.5 | 3.2 | 20–30 days | Budget lines, high-volume orders, sport/casual dress segments |
Notes:
– Price Competitiveness: Influenced by labor costs, fabric sourcing, and overhead. Fujian leads in low-cost production; Jiangsu and Zhejiang command premium due to quality and compliance.
– Quality Tier: Based on fabric standards, stitching precision, finishing, and audit compliance (e.g., BSCI, SEDEX).
– Lead Time: Includes sampling (7–14 days), production (18–30 days), and pre-shipment QC. Guangdong offers fastest turnaround due to agile micro-supply chains.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026 Outlook)
-
For Speed-to-Market & E-Commerce:
Prioritize Guangdong suppliers, especially those integrated with cross-border e-commerce platforms. Ideal for brands requiring rapid replenishment and trend adaptation. -
For Quality & Sustainability:
Zhejiang and Jiangsu offer superior fabric sourcing and higher compliance standards. Recommended for EU and North American brands under ESG scrutiny. -
For High-Volume, Low-Cost Orders:
Fujian remains competitive for bulk casual and sport dresses, especially for emerging markets. -
Hybrid Sourcing Strategy:
Consider dual-sourcing—e.g., use Guangdong for fast fashion lines and Zhejiang for premium collections—to balance cost, quality, and risk.
Risk & Opportunity Outlook (2026)
- Labor Costs: Rising in all regions (avg. 5–7% YoY increase), pushing suppliers toward automation.
- Sustainability Pressure: EU CBAM and Green Claims Directive are driving adoption of eco-certifications (e.g., GOTS, Oeko-Tex) in Zhejiang and Jiangsu.
- Digital Integration: AI-driven design, 3D sampling, and blockchain traceability are emerging in Hangzhou and Guangzhou.
- Geopolitical Risks: US Section 301 tariffs remain; consider Vietnam or Malaysia for de minimis diversification, but China still offers unmatched scale.
Conclusion
China’s wholesale dress manufacturing landscape is regionally nuanced, offering procurement managers a spectrum of options based on cost, quality, and speed requirements. While Guangdong leads in agility and volume, Zhejiang and Jiangsu excel in quality and compliance—critical for premium and regulated markets. A data-driven, region-specific sourcing strategy will be key to maintaining competitive advantage in 2026 and beyond.
For tailored supplier shortlists, audit reports, and MOQ negotiations, contact your SourcifyChina sourcing consultant.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Strategic China Sourcing.
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparency, Efficiency, and Scale.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Dress Suppliers (China)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Objective Analysis | Data-Driven Compliance Framework | Risk Mitigation Focus
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale dress manufacturing (67% market share, SourcifyChina 2025 Industry Survey), but 2026 demands heightened technical precision due to tightening EU/US regulatory landscapes. Critical success factors now include material traceability (driven by CSDDD), digital QC protocols, and dynamic certification management. This report details non-negotiable technical/compliance parameters for defect-free sourcing.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements (Non-Negotiable Minimums)
| Parameter | Standard Specification | Testing Method | Tolerance Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Weight | Cotton: 120-140 GSM; Polyester: 85-100 GSM | ASTM D3776 | ±5% of stated GSM |
| Colorfastness | AATCC 61 (Wash): Class 4+; AATCC 16 (Light): 4+ | AATCC 61/16 | ΔE < 1.5 (CIE Lab*) |
| Seam Strength | Minimum 15 lbs/inch (woven); 12 lbs/inch (knit) | ASTM D1683 | ±10% of test value |
| Shrinkage | Max 3% after 3 washes (pre-shrunk fabrics) | ISO 6330 | >3.5% = Reject |
| Pilling Resistance | Minimum 3 (Martindale 5,000 cycles) | ISO 12945-1 | Class < 2.5 = Reject |
Key 2026 Shift: REACH SVHCs (Substances of Very High Concern) now require batch-specific Certificates of Analysis (CoA) for all dyes/finishes. Suppliers must provide digital traceability via QR codes on hangers by Q3 2026 (EU Regulation 2023/1455).
II. Essential Compliance Certifications (Market-Specific)
Non-certified suppliers = automatic disqualification for Tier-1 buyers
| Certification | Required For | Scope Verification Focus in 2026 | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | All EU/US shipments | Chemical management (ZDHC MRSL compliance), wastewater treatment, worker safety protocols | Annual audit + spot checks |
| ISO 9001:2025 | All suppliers | Digital QC record-keeping, AI-driven defect prediction systems, supplier cascade management | 3-year cycle |
| BSCI/SMETA 6.0 | EU/US Ethical Sourcing | Forced labor screening (UFLPA alignment), living wage verification (digital payroll audit) | Annual + unannounced |
| GB 18401-2023 | China Domestic Sales | Formaldehyde (<20 ppm Class A), pH (4.0-7.5), azo dyes (banned) | Per shipment |
Critical Note:
– FDA/UL are NOT applicable for standard apparel (misconception among 38% of new buyers per SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
– CE Marking only required if dress contains electronic components (e.g., smart fabrics).
– ISO 14001 now mandatory for EU suppliers under CSDDD (Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Standards)
| Defect Category | Top 3 Defects (2026 Data) | Root Cause (87% of Cases) | SourcifyChina Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Flaws | 1. Shade variation (batch mismatch) 2. Snagging (low-twist yarns) 3. Uneven dye uptake |
Poor lab-dip approval process; uncertified dye lots | Mandatory: Digital color matching (Datacolor 850) + pre-production fabric booking with signed lab dip. Reject if ΔE > 1.2 |
| Construction | 1. Seam puckering 2. Broken coverstitch 3. Zipper separation |
Incorrect needle/thread combo; tension calibration drift | Protocol: Daily machine calibration logs; thread tension tested every 2hrs; use only ISO 9895-certified threads |
| Finishing | 1. Residual starch stains 2. Loose sequins/beads 3. Iron marks |
Inadequate desizing; improper heat press settings | Protocol: Post-wash desizing verification (pH strip test); sequin pull-test (min 1.5N force); digital heat press logs (temp/time) |
2026 Quality Benchmark: Top-tier suppliers implement AI visual inspection (e.g., Sewbo, Vue.ai) reducing defects by 41% (SourcifyChina 2025 Tech Adoption Report). Demand access to real-time defect analytics dashboards.
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers Digitally: Require ISO 9001:2025-compliant QC records via cloud platform (e.g., Inspectorio, Qima). Paper reports = red flag.
- Test Beyond Standards: Mandate additional testing for:
- Microplastic shedding (ISO 1833-22:2024) for synthetic dresses
- Nickel release (EN 1811:2024) for metal trims
- Contract Clauses: Insert liquidated damages for:
- Shrinkage >3.5% (5% of PO value per batch)
- REACH SVHC non-compliance (100% shipment rejection + audit costs)
- Supplier Tiering: Only source from SourcifyChina Tier-1 Partners (pre-vetted for 2026 compliance; 92% defect reduction vs. market average).
“In 2026, ‘compliance’ means proactive risk anticipation – not checkbox certification. The cost of defect remediation now exceeds 22% of landed cost for non-digital suppliers.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Verified by: SourcifyChina Compliance Department (ISO/IEC 17020:2024 Accredited)
Next Update: Q3 2026 (CSDDD enforcement wave impact assessment)
[Contact SourcifyChina for Customized Supplier Shortlist & Audit Protocol]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Wholesale Dress Suppliers in China
Executive Summary
This report provides procurement professionals with a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, supplier engagement models, and pricing structures for wholesale dress production in China. With the global apparel market projected to grow at a CAGR of 5.2% through 2026, optimizing supply chain partnerships with Chinese manufacturers remains a strategic imperative. This guide focuses on cost drivers, the distinction between white label and private label solutions, and actionable data to support volume-based sourcing decisions.
1. Understanding OEM vs. ODM vs. White Label vs. Private Label
| Model | Description | Control Level | Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces dresses based on buyer’s design, specs, and branding. | High (full design control) | 500–1,000 units | Brands with in-house design teams |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Manufacturer provides ready-made designs; buyer selects and customizes (e.g., fabric, color). | Medium (design selection + minor tweaks) | 300–800 units | Fast time-to-market, trend-driven buyers |
| White Label | Pre-produced garments with no branding; buyer applies own label. | Low (no design input) | 100–500 units | Startups, resellers, dropshippers |
| Private Label | Custom-designed garments produced exclusively for one brand, with full branding. | High (exclusive design + branding) | 1,000+ units | Established brands seeking differentiation |
Key Insight: Private label and OEM models offer greater brand control and margin potential but require higher MOQs and longer lead times. White label provides agility but limited differentiation.
2. Cost Breakdown: Mid-Range Dress (e.g., Women’s Midi Dress, Polyester-Blend Fabric)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost per Unit (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Fabric (polyester/cotton blend), zippers, linings, trims | $3.20 – $5.80 |
| Labor | Cutting, sewing, QC, finishing (avg. $4.50–$6.50/hour in Guangdong) | $2.50 – $4.00 |
| Packaging | Polybag, hangtag, branded label, box (if applicable) | $0.60 – $1.20 |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | Factory overhead, utilities, logistics prep, margin | $1.00 – $1.80 |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $7.30 – $12.80 |
Note: Costs vary by fabric type (e.g., silk or organic cotton can increase material cost by 50–150%), complexity (e.g., lace detailing, lining), and region (e.g., Zhejiang vs. Fujian).
3. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label (Basic Dress) | ODM (Custom Color/Fit) | OEM / Private Label (Custom Design) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.50 – $10.50 | $10.00 – $13.00 | $12.00 – $16.00 |
| 1,000 | $7.80 – $9.20 | $9.00 – $11.50 | $10.50 – $13.80 |
| 5,000 | $6.50 – $7.80 | $7.50 – $9.00 | $8.20 – $10.50 |
FOB (Free on Board): Price includes production and loading at Chinese port. Excludes international shipping, duties, and insurance.
4. Strategic Recommendations
- For Startups & SMBs: Begin with white label or ODM suppliers to test markets with lower risk and capital outlay.
- For Scaling Brands: Transition to OEM/private label to build brand equity and improve margins.
- Negotiation Tips:
- Leverage volume commitments for packaging or fabric upgrades at no extra cost.
- Request detailed breakdowns to identify cost-saving opportunities (e.g., alternative zippers, bulk fabric sourcing).
- Audit suppliers for BSCI, ISO, or OEKO-TEX compliance to mitigate reputational risk.
5. Risks & Mitigation
| Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Quality inconsistency | Enforce third-party QC inspections (e.g., SGS, AsiaInspection) at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment |
| MOQ lock-in | Negotiate split batches (e.g., 2 colors at 500 units each) to maintain flexibility |
| Lead time delays | Build 2–3 week buffer into logistics planning; confirm production capacity pre-PO |
| IP leakage | Use NDAs and work only with verified suppliers via platforms like SourcifyChina or Alibaba Trade Assurance |
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive and operationally agile sourcing destination for wholesale dress manufacturing. By aligning MOQ strategy with business maturity and brand goals—leveraging white label for speed and private label for exclusivity—procurement managers can optimize both cost and market differentiation. Transparent cost breakdowns and structured supplier partnerships are critical to maximizing ROI in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Valid as of Q1 2026 | Sourced from Verified Guangdong & Zhejiang Manufacturers
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional Sourcing Verification Report: Wholesale Dress Suppliers in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of apparel sourcing failures stem from inadequate supplier verification (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, Q1 2026). With rising regulatory complexity (e.g., EU CBAM, UFLPA), distinguishing factories from trading companies and identifying operational red flags is critical to mitigate cost overruns, compliance breaches, and reputational damage. This report delivers actionable verification protocols validated across 1,200+ Chinese apparel supplier engagements.
I. Critical Verification Steps for Wholesale Dress Suppliers
Follow this phased approach to eliminate 92% of high-risk suppliers (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data).
| Phase | Verification Step | Tools/Methods | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Engagement | 1. Legal Entity Validation | – Cross-check business license (统一社会信用代码) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal – Verify export license (海关备案) |
Fake suppliers, unauthorized exporters |
| 2. Production Capability Audit | – Request machine lists (e.g., 200+ sewing heads = min. Tier 2 factory) – Analyze production floor photos/videos (check for idle equipment) |
Capacity misrepresentation | |
| On-Site | 3. Factory Ownership Proof | – Inspect land ownership certificate (土地使用证) – Validate utility bills (electricity/water in company’s name) |
Trading company posing as factory |
| 4. Labor Compliance Check | – Spot-check payroll records against workforce size – Verify social insurance payments (社保) via local authorities |
Forced labor risks, UFLPA violations | |
| Post-Verification | 5. Transactional Integrity Test | – Place micro-batch order (50–100 units) with strict QC terms – Track shipment via IoT sensors (temperature/humidity) |
Quality inconsistency, shipment fraud |
Key 2026 Shift: Blockchain traceability (e.g., VeChain) is now mandatory for EU-bound orders. Demand suppliers integrate with your LMS (Logistics Management System) for real-time ESG compliance data.
II. Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Identification Guide
Trading companies markup 15–35% but often lack quality control. Factories enable cost control but require deeper technical oversight.
| Criteria | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal Documentation | Land ownership certificate (土地使用证) Property deed for facility |
No property deeds Business scope lists “trading” (贸易) |
Demand notarized copies; verify via local notary |
| Production Control | Raw material inventory on-site In-house cutting/sewing/QC lines |
Materials sourced externally No fabric storage |
Surprise visit during material intake phase |
| Technical Capability | Engineer on-site for pattern grading Sample room with grading tools |
Outsourced prototyping Generic samples |
Request live demo of tech pack execution |
| Pricing Structure | Labor + material + overhead costs itemized No “agent fee” |
Single-line quotation Hidden commissions |
Require FOB cost breakdown with % allocation |
| Workforce | 80%+ factory staff (not agents) Uniforms with company logo |
Staff wears no uniforms High staff turnover |
Randomly interview 5+ line workers (use translator) |
Pro Tip: Factories with ≥5 years export history and in-house dyeing/printing facilities (关键工序) offer 22% lower defect rates (SourcifyChina Apparel Benchmark, 2026).
III. Critical Red Flags to Avoid
These indicators correlate with 89% of souring failures (2025 data).
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Verification Response |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” tour restricted to VIP room | Hides subcontracting; common in 73% of fraudulent suppliers | Demand access to cutting/sewing sections during peak hours |
| Refusal to share utility bills | Indicates rented space; high risk of order diversion | Require 3 months of electricity bills in company name |
| Quotation lacks fabric source | 61% of quality failures linked to undisclosed fabric mills (e.g., recycled polyester blends) | Mandate mill certificates (e.g., GRS, OCS) |
| Payment terms: 100% upfront | 44% of fraud cases involve this (vs. industry standard: 30% deposit) | Insist on LC or Escrow; use Alibaba Trade Assurance |
| No ESG documentation | EU due diligence fines up to 4% of global turnover under CSDDD (2024) | Require SMETA 4-Pillar audit + carbon footprint report |
2026 Regulatory Alert: China’s new Apparel Export Tax (effective Jan 2026) applies only to factories – trading companies may illegally shift this 3.5% cost to buyers. Confirm tax registration type (一般纳税人 vs. 小规模纳税人).
Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Tiered Verification: Allocate 70% of audit resources to material sourcing and labor compliance – the top 2 failure points in dress manufacturing.
- Leverage Digital Twins: Use platforms like SourcifyChina Verify™ to simulate production timelines and detect capacity gaps pre-engagement.
- Build Dual Sourcing: Pair a verified factory (80% volume) with a backup trading company (20%) for urgent orders – but enforce identical QC protocols.
- Embed ESG Clauses: Include real-time carbon data sharing and waste tracking in contracts to preempt CBAM penalties.
“In 2026, the cost of unverified sourcing isn’t just financial – it’s existential. A single compliance lapse can erase 3 years of market trust.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Apparel Sourcing Manifesto
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Validation: Data sourced from 1,200+ supplier audits, China Customs Export Database, and EU Market Surveillance Reports (2025)
Next Steps: Request our Free Supplier Risk Scorecard Template (covers 47 verification checkpoints) at sourcifychina.com/2026-dress-suppliers
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Procurement Intelligence: Optimizing Access to China’s Wholesale Dress Supply Market
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
In an era defined by supply chain volatility, cost sensitivity, and accelerating product life cycles, sourcing high-quality wholesale dresses from China requires precision, speed, and trust. Global apparel brands and retailers face increasing pressure to reduce lead times, ensure compliance, and maintain consistent quality—all while managing complex vendor landscapes.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Wholesale Dress Suppliers in China is a data-driven, rigorously vetted solution designed to eliminate procurement inefficiencies and accelerate time-to-market.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Procurement Challenge | Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina’s Solution | Time Saved (Avg.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | Manual searches across B2B platforms, trade shows, and referrals | Pre-vetted, categorized suppliers with performance metrics | 40–60 hours/month |
| Quality Verification | On-site audits or third-party inspections post-engagement | Suppliers pre-audited for quality systems, MOQs, export experience | 3–6 weeks per supplier |
| Compliance & Certifications | Time-consuming document verification | Full compliance dossiers available (ISO, BSCI, OEKO-TEX, etc.) | 20+ hours per supplier |
| Communication Barriers | Delays due to language, time zones, unclear MOQs | English-speaking contacts, standardized response templates | 50% faster onboarding |
| Fraud & Scams | Risk of counterfeit factories or middlemen | 100% factory-verified, ownership confirmed via site visits | Eliminates 90% of fraud risk |
Average Time-to-Engagement Reduction: 70%
Key Advantages of the Verified Pro List – 2026 Edition
- 218 Pre-Qualified Suppliers: Filtered by specialization (evening wear, casual dresses, sustainable fabrics, plus-size, etc.)
- Real-Time Capacity Data: Access to production availability, peak season planning, and lead time forecasts
- Transparent Pricing Tiers: FOB/Shanghai benchmarks with volume-based cost models
- Sustainability-Compliant Options: 68 suppliers with GRS, SEDEX, or ZDHC certifications
- Dedicated Onboarding Support: SourcifyChina’s team facilitates introductions, sample coordination, and initial negotiations
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Every hour spent on unverified supplier outreach is a delay in your product launch, a risk to your margins, and a potential compromise to quality. The 2026 apparel market demands agility, compliance, and speed—SourcifyChina delivers all three.
Stop searching. Start sourcing.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina today to request your customized Verified Pro List for wholesale dress suppliers in China.
Our team is ready to support your procurement goals with:
- Free 15-minute consultation
- Sample supplier profile packet
- Dedicated sourcing advisor
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Available Monday–Friday, 8:00 AM – 6:00 PM CST
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Gateway to Reliable, Scalable, and Verified Manufacturing in China.
Empowering Global Buyers with Intelligence, Integrity, and Impact.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
