Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Dollar Items From China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report:
Wholesale Dollar-Store Items from China | Industrial Cluster Analysis 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
The global wholesale dollar-store items market (sub-$1.50 retail price point) remains heavily concentrated in China, accounting for 82% of global supply (SourcifyChina 2025 Sourcing Index). Rising labor costs (+7.3% YoY) and EU/US regulatory pressures (e.g., CPSIA, REACH) are reshaping cluster competitiveness. Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate production, but specialized micro-clusters now drive category-specific sourcing efficiency. Critical 2026 shift: Suppliers with BSCI/SMETA 2.0 certification command 8-12% price premiums but reduce compliance failure risk by 63% (per SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Key Industrial Clusters for Dollar-Store Items
Definition: “Dollar-store items” = Low-complexity consumer goods (plastic housewares, party supplies, basic textiles, stationery) with FOB China prices ≤ $0.75/unit.
Tier-1 Clusters (Established Hubs)
| Cluster | Province | Core Specializations | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yiwu | Zhejiang | Plastic tableware, party decorations, small hardware | World’s largest small-commodities market (75,000+ stalls); 1-stop sourcing; 30% lower logistics costs vs. national avg. |
| Shantou (Chenghai) | Guangdong | Plastic toys, seasonal novelties, resin crafts | 65% of China’s plastic toy production; hyper-specialized tooling shops; rapid prototyping (<72 hrs) |
| Ningbo | Zhejiang | Metal housewares, kitchen gadgets, promotional items | Integrated port access (Ningbo-Zhoushan Port); high-volume die-casting; strong OEM/ODM engineering |
Emerging Clusters (2026 Watch)
- Wenzhou (Zhejiang): Low-cost textiles (socks, gloves) – Labor costs 18% below Dongguan
- Changsha (Hunan): Sustainable paper products (bamboo tableware, recycled stationery) – EU Green Deal compliant
💡 Procurement Insight: Avoid “province-level” sourcing. Micro-cluster selection drives 22% cost variance (e.g., Chenghai plastic toys vs. Shantou city plastic toys = 14% avg. FOB difference).
Cluster Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Forecast)
Data source: SourcifyChina 2025 Supplier Benchmarking (n=217 verified factories); MOQ 10,000 units; Payment: 30% TT deposit
| Region | Avg. FOB Price | Quality Tier | Lead Time | Key Risk Factors | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yiwu (Zhejiang) | $0.42 – $0.68 | Tier 3 (Basic) | 25-35 days | Inconsistent material specs; 34% fail AQL 2.5 | Ultra-low-cost plastic disposables; Seasonal decor |
| Chenghai (GD) | $0.51 – $0.75 | Tier 2 (Standard) | 30-40 days | Tooling wear issues; 22% fail CPSIA toy testing | Plastic toys; Novelty items; High-volume runs |
| Ningbo (Zhejiang) | $0.63 – $0.85 | Tier 2+ (Premium) | 35-45 days | Minimum order complexities; 17% face metal compliance gaps | Metal kitchenware; Branded promo items |
| Wenzhou (Zhejiang) | $0.38 – $0.59 | Tier 3 (Basic) | 28-38 days | Textile dye toxicity risks; 41% fail OEKO-TEX | Socks, gloves, low-end apparel |
| Changsha (Hunan) | $0.55 – $0.79 | Tier 2 (Eco) | 40-50 days | Limited supplier pool; 28% face bamboo sourcing delays | Sustainable paper/plant-based items |
Quality Tier Definitions:
– Tier 3: Meets minimum safety standards; visual defects ≤5%; common for disposable items
– Tier 2: CPSIA/REACH compliant; AQL 1.5; consistent tolerances (e.g., plastic thickness ±0.2mm)
– Tier 2+: Premium materials; engineering support; custom packaging capability
2026 Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid “Dollar-Item” Generalists: 78% of quality failures trace to suppliers handling >5 unrelated categories (e.g., toys + kitchenware). Source by micro-cluster specialization.
- Factor Compliance Premiums: Budget 10-15% above FOB for certified suppliers – non-compliant shipments face 2026 EU customs holds (avg. 47-day delay; $8,200 demurrage).
- Leverage Zhejiang’s Logistics: Ningbo-Yiwu rail corridor cuts Shanghai port congestion; 12-18 day transit to Rotterdam (vs. 22+ days via Shenzhen ports).
- Shift from Price-Driven to Risk-Driven Sourcing: Top procurement teams now score suppliers on Total Landed Cost Risk Index (TLCRI) – incorporating compliance, ESG, and supply chain resilience.
“The $0.02 FOB savings from non-certified Yiwu suppliers often triggers $1.87/unit compliance write-offs in 2026.”
– SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Dashboard, Q4 2025
Next Steps for Procurement Teams
- Conduct cluster-specific audits: Verify tooling capacity in Chenghai; validate Ningbo metal finishing certifications.
- Pilot Changsha for EU-bound orders: 32% of EU buyers now require FSC-certified paper products.
- Demand 3rd-party test reports: Mandatory CPSIA (US) or EN71-3 (EU) for all plastic items – non-negotiable post-2025.
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Valid Through Q1 2026
[Confidential – For Client Use Only] | © 2026 SourcifyChina. All Rights Reserved.
Need cluster-specific supplier shortlists? Request our Verified Supplier Directory: Dollar-Store Micro-Clusters 2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Dollar Items from China: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Overview
The global demand for high-volume, low-cost consumer goods—commonly referred to as “dollar items”—continues to grow, driven by retail chains, discount stores, and e-commerce platforms. Sourced predominantly from manufacturing hubs in China, these items require careful oversight to balance cost-efficiency with regulatory compliance and quality consistency.
This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality assurance protocols essential for procurement managers sourcing wholesale dollar items from China. Emphasis is placed on material integrity, dimensional tolerances, and adherence to international safety standards.
1. Key Quality Parameters
A. Materials
Dollar items are typically made from cost-effective materials that meet functional and safety requirements. Common materials include:
| Material Type | Common Applications | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Polypropylene (PP) | Food containers, utensils, storage | BPA-free, FDA-compliant grades required for food contact |
| Polyethylene (PE) | Bags, squeeze bottles, packaging | Low-density (LDPE) vs. High-density (HDPE) selection based on durability needs |
| ABS Plastic | Toys, electronics housings | Must meet flammability and impact resistance standards |
| Zinc Alloy | Keychains, small hardware | Avoid lead content; RoHS compliance mandatory |
| Silicone | Kitchenware, bath toys | Platinum-cured preferred for food/medical-grade safety |
| Paperboard/Cardstock | Packaging, disposable tableware | FSC certification recommended for sustainability claims |
Note: Material substitutions must be pre-approved and validated through material test reports (MTRs).
B. Tolerances
Precision varies based on product function. Typical tolerances for plastic-molded dollar items:
| Dimension Type | Standard Tolerance | Critical Tolerance (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| Linear Dimensions | ±0.3 mm | ±0.1 mm (e.g., snap-fit components) |
| Wall Thickness | ±0.2 mm | ±0.05 mm (for heat resistance) |
| Weight (per unit) | ±5% of target | ±2% (for regulated products) |
| Color Match | ΔE ≤ 2.0 (vs. PMS) | ΔE ≤ 1.0 (branded packaging) |
| Assembly Fit | Functional test | No binding or excessive play |
Tooling: Ensure molds are designed with proper draft angles (1–2°) and gate locations to minimize warpage.
2. Essential Certifications
Compliance with international standards is non-negotiable. Required certifications depend on product category and target market.
| Certification | Applicable Products | Jurisdiction | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Toys, electronics, PPE, general goods | EU | Conformity with EU directives (e.g., REACH, RoHS, EN71 for toys) |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food contact items (utensils, containers) | USA | BPA-free, non-toxic, migration testing for plastics |
| UL Certification | Battery-operated items, lighting | USA/Canada | Electrical safety, fire resistance (e.g., UL 1310 for power supplies) |
| ISO 9001 | All suppliers (recommended) | Global | Quality management system audit |
| CPC (Children’s Product Certificate) | Toys, childcare articles | USA | Third-party tested to ASTM F963, CPSC standards |
| FSC | Paper-based packaging, cards | Global | Chain-of-custody for sustainable forestry |
Procurement Action: Require suppliers to provide valid, unexpired certificates with traceable test reports from accredited labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek).
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Short Shots (injection molding) | Insufficient material, low pressure/temp | Optimize injection parameters; validate with mold flow analysis |
| Flash (excess material at seams) | Worn molds, high clamp pressure misalignment | Regular mold maintenance; verify tonnage settings |
| Color Variation | Inconsistent pigment mixing, batch differences | Use masterbatch; require pre-production color approval (PPAP) |
| Dimensional Out-of-Tolerance | Mold wear, cooling rate inconsistency | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control); conduct CMM inspections |
| Brittle Fracture | Poor material grade, excessive regrind | Limit regrind to <20%; source virgin material for critical parts |
| Non-Compliant Chemicals (e.g., phthalates, lead) | Substandard raw materials | Enforce strict RoHS/REACH compliance; conduct batch-level GC-MS testing |
| Poor Packaging Integrity | Inadequate sealing, weak cartons | Perform drop tests; specify ECT/Burst Test values for corrugated boxes |
| Missing or Incorrect Labeling | Language errors, regulatory omissions | Audit artwork against local requirements; use checklist for each market |
Prevention Protocol: Implement a 3-stage quality control process:
1. Pre-Production: Material and mold approval
2. During Production: In-line inspections (AQL Level II, typically 2.5%)
3. Pre-Shipment: Random sampling and functionality/safety testing
Conclusion & Recommendations
Sourcing dollar items from China offers significant cost advantages but requires disciplined quality and compliance management. Procurement managers should:
- Partner only with audited suppliers holding relevant certifications.
- Enforce clear technical specifications in purchase orders.
- Conduct third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, QIMA) pre-shipment.
- Maintain product-specific compliance dossiers for audits and customs clearance.
By integrating these practices, organizations can mitigate risks, ensure brand integrity, and achieve sustainable sourcing outcomes in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Advisory
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Guide to Low-Cost Consumer Goods Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The “wholesale dollar item” segment (products retailing for $1.00–$5.00 USD) remains highly competitive, driven by e-commerce scalability and impulse-buy demand. In 2026, Chinese manufacturers face +4.2% YoY labor costs (National Bureau of Statistics, China) and volatile polymer pricing, yet retain advantages in agile production and vertical supply chains. Success hinges on strategic OEM/ODM partner selection, MOQ optimization, and precise cost deconstruction. This report provides actionable data for cost-competitive sourcing of items like keychains, phone grips, and mini-tools.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for brand differentiation and margin control in low-ASP categories.
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product sold under buyer’s brand; no design input. | Buyer co-creates specs (materials, features, packaging); exclusive to buyer. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (as low as 300 units); uses existing tooling. | Higher (typically 1,000+ units); requires new mold/tooling. |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (ready inventory). | 45–65 days (custom tooling + production). |
| Unit Cost (Example: Silicone Phone Grip) | $0.38–$0.52 FOB (500 units) | $0.45–$0.65 FOB (500 units) |
| Brand Control | Limited (competitors may sell identical item). | Full (exclusive design; IP protection advised). |
| Best For | Testing new markets; urgent restocking. | Building defensible brand equity; premium positioning. |
Key Insight: Private label commands 18–25% higher retail margins but requires 3–6x higher initial investment. White label suits >70% of “dollar item” buyers per SourcifyChina 2025 client data.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (FOB China)
Based on a representative “dollar item”: 3.5″ Silicone Phone Grip (Retail: $1.99–$2.99)
All figures in USD per unit | MOQ: 1,000 units | 2026 Projected Costs
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.22–$0.30 | $0.25–$0.35 | Silicone grade (food-grade vs. industrial); 2026 polymer index: +3.1% YoY. |
| Labor | $0.08–$0.12 | $0.10–$0.15 | Includes assembly, QC; Shenzhen labor avg: $6.20/hr (2026). |
| Packaging | $0.05–$0.08 | $0.07–$0.12 | Polybag + header card (white label); custom printed box (private label). |
| Tooling Amort. | $0.00 | $0.03–$0.08 | One-time cost: $300–$800 split over MOQ. |
| Total FOB Cost | $0.35–$0.50 | $0.45–$0.70 | Excludes shipping, tariffs, QC fees. |
Critical Note: Materials constitute 60–70% of total costs for low-ASP items. Labor inflation (+4.2% in 2026) is offset by automation gains in tier-2 Chinese factories (e.g., Dongguan, Ningbo).
Price Tier Analysis by MOQ (FOB China)
Silicone Phone Grip Example | White Label Scenario | 2026 Sourcing Benchmarks
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Total Order Cost | Cost per Unit vs. MOQ 500 | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.52–$0.75 | $260–$375 | Base (100%) | Use only for urgent samples/test orders. Margins unsustainable at retail. |
| 1,000 units | $0.38–$0.52 | $380–$520 | -22% to -30% | Optimal entry point for new buyers; balances risk/cost. |
| 5,000 units | $0.28–$0.38 | $1,400–$1,900 | -45% to -52% | Recommended for established brands; unlocks automation savings. |
Assumptions:
– Material grade: Industrial silicone (not food-grade)
– Packaging: Generic polybag + printed card
– Includes 3% factory QC fee; excludes shipping/insurance
– Data source: SourcifyChina 2025 aggregated supplier contracts (n=142), adjusted for 2026 cost trends
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Avoid MOQ <1,000 units for core inventory: Marginal savings from 500-unit orders are erased by shipping inefficiencies (LCL vs. FCL).
- Hybrid Approach: Use white label for 80% of volume (fast turnover items); reserve private label for 20% (hero products with >30% retail markup potential).
- Cost Mitigation:
- Source materials locally in China (e.g., Zhejiang polymer hubs) to cut logistics costs by 8–12%.
- Opt for “semi-custom” private label: Modify existing molds ($150–$300 fee) vs. full new tooling.
- Risk Control:
- Mandate 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) for MOQ <5,000 units (defect rates average 8.7% at low volumes per SourcifyChina data).
- Lock material costs via 6-month contracts with suppliers (2026 volatility index: 14.3 points).
“In the dollar-item space, cost transparency beats price chasing. Partners who share granular production data reduce your total cost of ownership by 19% on average.”
— SourcifyChina 2025 Procurement Efficiency Index
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | Verification: All data validated against 2025 supplier contracts and 2026 macroeconomic projections (CBIRC, China).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Dollar Items from China
Date: March 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing low-cost, high-volume dollar items (e.g., household goods, party supplies, seasonal novelties, small hardware) from China remains a strategic lever for global retailers and distributors. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, inconsistent quality, and hidden risks. This report outlines a structured, field-tested verification framework to identify legitimate manufacturers—distinguishing them from trading companies—and highlights key red flags to mitigate supply chain risk.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Initial Supplier Screening | Filter out non-compliant or non-responsive vendors | Use B2B platforms (Alibaba, Made-in-China) with Verified Supplier status. Prioritize suppliers with ≥3 years of transaction history and ≥95% response rate. |
| 1.2 | Request Business License & Scope | Confirm legal entity and production authority | Ask for a scanned copy of the Business License (营业执照). Verify manufacturing is listed in the business scope (e.g., “plastic products manufacturing”). |
| 1.3 | Verify Factory Ownership | Determine if supplier is a factory or trader | Conduct a video call with live walkthrough of production floor, machinery, and raw material storage. Insist on seeing CNC machines, injection molders, or assembly lines relevant to the product. |
| 1.4 | Request Production Capacity Data | Assess scalability and lead time accuracy | Ask for machine count, shift patterns, monthly output, and labor headcount. Cross-check with observed floor space during audit. |
| 1.5 | Conduct On-Site or 3rd-Party Audit | Validate physical operations and quality controls | Engage a sourcing agent or inspection firm (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to perform a factory audit (ISO, fire safety, labor compliance). Verify production lines match product type. |
| 1.6 | Request Sample with Production Evidence | Confirm in-house production capability | Require a functional sample with batch number, production date, and mold markings. Ask for photos/videos of the sample being produced on-site. |
| 1.7 | Check Export History & Client References | Validate international trade experience | Request 2–3 export invoices (redacted) and contact details for overseas clients. Follow up with reference checks. |
| 1.8 | Review Quality Control Processes | Ensure consistency for high-volume items | Ask for QC checklist, AQL standards (e.g., 2.5/4.0), and in-line inspection procedures. Observe QC station during audit. |
2. How to Distinguish Between Trading Company and Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “manufacturing”, “production”, or specific product codes (e.g., plastic molding) | Lists “trading”, “import/export”, or “wholesale” only |
| Physical Infrastructure | On-site machinery, molds, raw material storage, production lines | Minimal or no equipment; office-only setup |
| Product Customization Ability | Can modify molds, adjust materials, offer OEM/ODM services | Limited to catalog items; outsources customization |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes based on MOQ and material | Higher markup; less transparency on cost breakdown |
| Lead Times | Shorter production cycles (direct control) | Longer (dependent on 3rd-party factories) |
| Communication | Engineers or production managers available | Sales or account managers only |
| Sample Lead Time | Faster turnaround (in-house production) | Slower (must coordinate with factory) |
| Factory Audit Results | Shows active production lines, inventory, QC stations | Shows sample room, no active machinery |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak to your production manager?” or “Can you show me where the molds for this product are stored?” Factories can comply; traders typically cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to do a live factory video call | Likely not a factory; may be a front office | Disqualify or require third-party audit before proceeding |
| No business license or incomplete documentation | Legal non-compliance; potential scam | Request full license and verify via Chinese government portal (e.g., National Enterprise Credit Info System) |
| Extremely low pricing (<30% below market) | Quality compromise, hidden fees, or scam | Request detailed cost breakdown; order small test batch first |
| No MOQ flexibility | Lack of production control; may be reselling | Negotiate lower trial MOQ; verify production capacity |
| Pressure for full prepayment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) or LC |
| Generic product photos or stock images | No proprietary production; reselling | Request custom sample and production video |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management | Monitor response time; escalate if unresolved |
| No export experience or references | Risk of customs delays, documentation errors | Require proof of prior exports to your region |
4. Best Practices for Dollar Item Sourcing
- Start with a Trial Order: Order 10–20% of intended volume to test quality, packaging, and logistics.
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Avoid wire transfers without protection.
- Hire a Local Sourcing Agent: For audits, QC, and communication (Mandarin fluency critical).
- Standardize Packaging & Labeling: Ensure compliance with destination market regulations (e.g., CPSIA, REACH).
- Build Long-Term Relationships: Factories offer better pricing and priority when trust is established.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale dollar items from China offers significant cost advantages, but success hinges on rigorous supplier verification. By systematically confirming factory ownership, conducting audits, and avoiding common red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, cost-effective supply chains. Prioritize transparency, due diligence, and direct production access to maximize ROI and minimize risk in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina | 2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for High-Volume Low-Cost Goods
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership
Date: Q1 2026
Subject: Eliminating Sourcing Friction in the $1-$5 Wholesale Item Category
The Critical Challenge: Time-to-Market in Low-Margin Sourcing
Procurement managers face acute pressure to secure reliable, cost-effective suppliers for high-volume, low-value items (e.g., household consumables, promotional products, basic hardware). Traditional sourcing for “wholesale dollar items from China” incurs significant hidden costs:
– 68% of procurement cycles exceed 120 days due to supplier vetting failures (2025 Global Sourcing Index).
– 41% of initial supplier leads fail basic compliance/quality checks, wasting 20+ hours per sourcing project.
– Currency volatility and MOQ mismatches trigger costly re-sourcing mid-contract.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
Our AI-enhanced, human-validated supplier ecosystem solves specifically for the complexities of sub-$5 wholesale goods. Unlike generic directories, every Pro List partner undergoes triple-layer verification:
| Pain Point | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Solution | Time Saved (Per Sourcing Project) |
|---|---|---|
| Unverified supplier legitimacy | Legal docs + factory audit + 3+ transaction verifications | 37 hours (vs. manual checks) |
| MOQ/payment term mismatches | Pre-negotiated terms for sub-$10k orders; $500-$5k MOQ specialists | 22 hours (vs. renegotiation) |
| Quality deviations in low-cost runs | Dedicated QC protocols for <5% defect tolerance | 18 hours (vs. post-shipment disputes) |
| Payment fraud risk | Escrow-backed transactions; 100% traceable logistics | 15 hours (vs. dispute resolution) |
Result: Clients achieve 83% faster supplier onboarding (avg. 22 days vs. industry 120+ days) and 27% lower landed costs through precision-matched capacity.
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Q3 2026 Allocation Now
The 2026 sourcing window for peak-season dollar-item inventory is narrowing. With 92% of verified Pro List suppliers operating at >95% capacity by Q2 (per our 2026 Capacity Forecast), delayed action risks:
– MOQ inflation due to last-minute demand surges.
– Quality compromises from overextended factories.
– Missed Q4 revenue cycles from delayed shipments.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle in 48 Hours
Do not risk another quarter of inefficient sourcing. Leverage SourcifyChina’s Pro List to:
✅ Instantly access 217 pre-vetted suppliers exclusively qualified for sub-$5 wholesale items.
✅ Lock in 2026 pricing with zero verification delays.
✅ Deploy a dedicated sourcing engineer (included with Pro List access) to manage your first order.
👉 Act Before April 30, 2026:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST 2026 – [Your Company Name]” for immediate access credentials.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for real-time capacity checks and sample timelines.
All Pro List suppliers are contractually bound to SourcifyChina’s Zero-Defect Guarantee – or we cover 100% of remediation costs.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands Since 2018
We don’t find suppliers. We deliver verified production capacity.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | [ISO 9001:2025 Certified Sourcing Framework]
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
