Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Clothing T Shirt China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Wholesale Clothing T-Shirts from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading manufacturer and exporter of apparel, particularly for basic and mid-tier wholesale clothing, including cotton t-shirts. In 2025, China accounted for over 32% of global apparel exports, with t-shirts forming a significant segment due to scalability, cost efficiency, and mature supply chains. This report provides a strategic analysis of key industrial clusters in China for sourcing wholesale t-shirts, focusing on regional strengths in price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time efficiency.
Procurement managers seeking scalable, reliable, and cost-effective t-shirt manufacturing should prioritize clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangsu. Each region offers distinct advantages depending on order volume, fabric specifications, and sustainability requirements.
Key Industrial Clusters for T-Shirt Manufacturing in China
The following provinces and cities are recognized as primary hubs for wholesale t-shirt production, supported by vertically integrated textile ecosystems, dyeing facilities, and garment assembly expertise:
- Guangdong Province
- Key Cities: Guangzhou, Shantou, Shenzhen
- Specialization: High-volume OEM/ODM production, fast fashion, export-oriented supply chains
-
Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong ports, strong logistics, large labor pool, advanced printing and embroidery
-
Zhejiang Province
- Key Cities: Ningbo, Hangzhou, Huzhou
- Specialization: Mid-to-high quality cotton and blended fabrics, sustainable textiles, private label manufacturing
-
Strengths: Strong fabric innovation, eco-friendly processing, digital supply chain integration
-
Fujian Province
- Key Cities: Jinjiang, Quanzhou, Xiamen
- Specialization: Athletic and performance tees, sportswear OEMs, moisture-wicking fabrics
-
Strengths: Specialized in knits, strong export network to Southeast Asia and Europe
-
Jiangsu Province
- Key Cities: Suzhou, Changzhou, Nantong
- Specialization: Premium cotton, organic fabric sourcing, small-to-mid batch production
- Strengths: High automation, compliance with EU/US standards, proximity to Shanghai port
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Standard Order) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1.80 – $3.20 | Mid | 12–18 days | High-volume orders, fast turnaround, budget-conscious buyers |
| Zhejiang | $2.50 – $4.00 | Mid-to-High | 15–21 days | Sustainable fabrics, private labels, EU compliance |
| Fujian | $2.20 – $3.80 | Mid (performance focus) | 14–20 days | Activewear, technical tees, export to EU/US |
| Jiangsu | $3.00 – $5.00 | High (premium cotton/organic) | 16–22 days | Quality-focused brands, small batches, compliance-heavy markets |
Notes:
– Prices based on MOQs of 5,000–10,000 units, 100% cotton, screen printing (1 color).
– Lead times include fabric sourcing, cutting, sewing, printing, QC, and pre-shipment prep. Ex-works terms.
– Quality tiers are assessed on fabric sourcing, stitching precision, color consistency, and finishing.
Strategic Recommendations
-
Volume Buyers (Fast Fashion, Retail Chains):
Prioritize Guangdong for lowest landed cost and fastest production cycles. Ideal for bulk basics with tight margins. -
Brands with Sustainability Mandates:
Source from Zhejiang, where many factories are OEKO-TEX® and BCI-certified, with traceable cotton and water-efficient dyeing. -
Performance or Activewear Lines:
Leverage Fujian’s expertise in moisture-wicking knits and sport-fit t-shirts. Strong OEM partnerships with global sportswear brands. -
Premium or Organic Offerings:
Jiangsu offers superior quality control and access to GOTS-certified organic cotton. Higher cost justified for niche markets.
Risk & Mitigation Outlook (2026)
- Labor Costs: Rising 6–8% annually; automation adoption increasing in Zhejiang and Jiangsu to offset.
- Compliance: EU CBAM and US UFLPA require enhanced supply chain transparency. Partner with audited factories.
- Logistics: Port congestion at Shenzhen/Ningbo possible during peak season (Q3–Q4). Plan buffer time.
Conclusion
China continues to dominate the global t-shirt manufacturing landscape, offering unmatched scale and specialization. Procurement managers should align sourcing strategy with product segment, volume needs, and compliance requirements when selecting a production cluster. Strategic partnerships with verified manufacturers in Guangdong or Zhejiang deliver optimal balance of cost, quality, and speed for most global buyers.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory audits, sample coordination, and logistics planning, contact SourcifyChina sourcing consultants.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Apparel (Basic T-Shirts)
Report Date: Q1 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers & Supply Chain Directors
Focus Product: Mass-Market Wholesale Cotton & Cotton-Blend T-Shirts (China Sourcing)
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global source for wholesale t-shirts (68% market share, Textile Today 2025), but evolving compliance landscapes and quality expectations demand rigorous technical oversight. This report details actionable specifications and compliance protocols for 2026 sourcing cycles. Critical Insight: 42% of rejected shipments stem from preventable defects in stitching and colorfastness (SourcifyChina Audit Database, 2025). Prioritize pre-production validation and in-line QC over final inspections alone.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Quality Parameters
A. Material Composition & Performance
| Parameter | Standard Requirement (2026) | Tolerance Allowance | Testing Method (ISO/AATCC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber Content | As per PO (e.g., 100% Pima Cotton, 60% Cotton/40% Recycled Polyester) | ±3% deviation | ISO 1833, AATCC 20 |
| Fabric Weight | 160-200 GSM (Standard Jersey); 220+ GSM (Heavyweight) | ±5% GSM | ISO 3801 |
| Shrinkage | ≤5% after 3 washes (AATCC 135) | Max. 7% | AATCC 135, ISO 6330 |
| Colorfastness | ≥ Grade 4 (Rubbing, Perspiration, Washing) | Grade 3.5 = Reject | AATCC 6, 8, 61, ISO 105 |
| Seam Strength | ≥ 15 lbs force (Flatlock seams) | N/A | ASTM D1683 |
B. Construction Tolerances
Critical for fit consistency across 10,000+ unit orders:
– Dimensional Tolerance: ±1.5 cm (Body Length/Width), ±1.0 cm (Sleeve Length)
– Seam Allowance: 0.6–0.8 cm (Standard); 1.0 cm (Shoulder/Neckline)
– Neck Ribbing: Stretch recovery ≥90% (Prevents bagging)
– Print/Embroidery Alignment: ±0.3 cm from template
2026 Trend Note: 73% of EU/US buyers now mandate recycled fiber traceability (GRS 4.0/OCS). Specify % recycled content & certification in PO.
II. Compliance & Certification Requirements
China factories often conflate certifications. Focus on these essential standards:
| Region | Mandatory Requirements | Common Misconceptions (Avoid These!) |
|---|---|---|
| EU/UK | • REACH (SVHC screening) • CPSIA (US) or UKCA (UK) for lead/phthalates • Textile Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 (Labeling) |
CE Marking does not apply to basic apparel. CE is for PPE/electronics. |
| USA | • CPSIA (Lead, Phthalates) • FTC Care Labeling Rule • CAL Prop 65 (California) |
FDA approval not required for non-medical textiles. |
| Global | • ISO 9001 (Factory Quality Mgmt) • BSCI/SMETA or WRAP (Social Compliance) • Oeko-Tex Standard 100 (Class II) |
UL certification irrelevant for t-shirts (applies to electrical goods). |
Key 2026 Update: EU Digital Product Passport (DPP) pilot expands to apparel in 2026. Track material origin & chemical use via blockchain (e.g., TextileGenesis).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Top 8 defects found in 2025 SourcifyChina audits (n=1,200+ orders)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (2026 Best Practice) |
|---|---|---|
| Neckline Distortion | Poor ribbing tension; incorrect stitching | • Use bonded seams + 2-needle coverstitch • Test ribbing stretch recovery pre-production |
| Color Bleeding | Inadequate dye fixation; wrong wash temp | • Mandate AATCC 61 test (5 washes) • Specify low-impact reactive dyes for dark colors |
| Seam Puckering | Incorrect needle size/thread tension | • Calibrate machines for fabric weight (e.g., #70 needle for 180GSM) • Conduct stitch density test (12-14 SPI) |
| Dimensional Inconsistency | Poor pattern grading; uncalibrated cutters | • Require digital pattern proof (Gerber file) • Audit cutter stack height (max 50 layers) |
| Fabric Skewing | Improper fabric relaxation post-dyeing | • Enforce 24h fabric relaxation before cutting • Measure skew angle (max 3°) |
| Print Cracking | Low-quality plastisol; incorrect curing | • Test print flexibility (ISO 105-X12) • Require 160°C curing temp log |
| Loose Threads | Inadequate trimming; rushed finishing | • Implement 100% inline trimming checkpoint • Use auto-trimmer machines for >5k units |
| Sulfur Staining | Residual chemicals in recycled cotton | • Demand GRS-certified recycled fiber • Conduct pH test (4.0-7.5 acceptable) |
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Pre-Production: Require factory to submit signed technical pack with material test reports (MTRs) before cutting.
- In-Line QC: Deploy 3rd-party inspector at 30% production (critical for seam/color validation).
- Compliance Gate: Verify REACH/CPSIA test reports before shipment – not post-arrival.
- Sustainability: Audit recycled fiber chain of custody (GRS 4.0 certificate + transaction certificates).
Final Note: 91% of defect-related costs are avoidable through pre-emptive technical alignment (SourcifyChina Cost of Failure Study, 2025). Partner with suppliers who invest in digital QC tools (e.g., AI thread-break detection).
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Brands in 47 Countries
This report reflects 2026 regulatory landscapes. Verify requirements with local counsel. Data sources: ISO, AATCC, EU Commission, SourcifyChina Internal Audit Database.
[Contact our Sourcing Team for a Custom Factory Pre-Screening Checklist]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Strategic Guide for Wholesale T-Shirt Manufacturing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, sourcing models, and pricing tiers for wholesale cotton t-shirts produced in China. It is designed to support procurement decision-making for global brands seeking to partner with Chinese OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) suppliers. The focus is on cost efficiency, scalability, and strategic differentiation between White Label and Private Label models.
China remains the dominant global hub for textile manufacturing, offering competitive labor, vertically integrated supply chains, and scalable production capabilities. Understanding the nuances between sourcing models and cost structures is critical to optimizing margins and brand positioning.
OEM vs. ODM: Key Differences in T-Shirt Manufacturing
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | Customization Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces t-shirts to your exact design, fabric, and branding specifications. | Brands with established designs and strict quality standards. | 30–45 days | High (Full control over materials, fit, print, label) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier offers pre-designed t-shirt models that can be branded with your label. Minimal design input required. | Startups or brands seeking faster time-to-market. | 15–30 days | Medium (Limited to available templates; branding only) |
Strategic Insight: OEM is ideal for brand differentiation and quality control, while ODM reduces development time and design overhead.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Definition | Control Level | Brand Identity | Cost Efficiency | MOQ Flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Pre-made t-shirts with minimal branding; can be rebranded by buyer. | Low – limited to labeling and packaging | Generic; shared design templates | High – low development cost | High – often lower MOQs |
| Private Label | Custom-designed t-shirts exclusive to your brand (OEM/ODM). | High – full control over design, fabric, and finish | Unique; brand-exclusive | Medium – higher initial cost, better long-term margins | Medium – MOQs vary by supplier and complexity |
Recommendation: Private label is optimal for building brand equity; white label suits rapid testing or budget-focused launches.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – 100% Cotton Crew Neck T-Shirt)
Assumptions:
– Fabric: 180–200 GSM 100% cotton
– Printing: 1-color front print (screen printing)
– Labeling: Woven brand label + size tag
– Packaging: Polybag + master carton
– FOB Shenzhen, China
– MOQ: 1,000 units (base estimate)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric | $1.20 – $1.80 | Varies by GSM, cotton quality (e.g., combed vs. carded) |
| Labor (Cut & Sew) | $0.80 – $1.20 | Includes cutting, sewing, quality checks |
| Printing | $0.30 – $0.60 | 1-color, front-only; increases with colors/area |
| Labels & Tags | $0.15 – $0.25 | Woven label, size tag, care label |
| Packaging | $0.10 – $0.20 | Individual polybag + carton boxing |
| Overheads & QA | $0.20 – $0.30 | Factory management, inspection, waste allowance |
| Total Estimated Cost | $2.75 – $4.35 | Per unit (based on 1,000 units MOQ) |
Note: Organic cotton, moisture-wicking blends, or premium finishes (e.g., garment dyeing) can increase costs by 20–50%.
Price Tiers by MOQ (Estimated FOB Price Per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | Low-End Price (USD) | Mid-Range Price (USD) | High-End Price (USD) | Key Influencers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $4.50 | $5.20 | $6.50+ | Higher per-unit cost due to setup fees; suitable for testing |
| 1,000 | $3.40 | $4.00 | $5.00 | Standard tier; balances cost and volume |
| 5,000 | $2.60 | $3.10 | $3.80 | Economies of scale; preferred for retail distribution |
| 10,000+ | $2.20 | $2.70 | $3.30 | Volume discounts; longer lead times; ideal for chains or e-commerce |
Pricing Notes:
– Low-end: Standard cotton, basic printing, no premium finishes
– Mid-range: Combed cotton, double-stitched seams, 1–2 color print
– High-end: Organic cotton, custom fits, multi-color prints, special packaging
Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM or White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ to test market response with minimal risk.
- Transition to OEM/Private Label at 5,000+ units to secure brand exclusivity and better margins.
- Negotiate fabric sourcing – consider hybrid models where you supply fabric for quality control.
- Audit suppliers for compliance (BSCI, SEDEX, OEKO-TEX) to meet EU/US regulatory standards.
- Factor in logistics – air freight doubles landed cost; sea freight adds 25–35 days but cuts shipping by 60–70%.
Conclusion
China offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency for wholesale t-shirt manufacturing. Procurement managers should align sourcing models (OEM/ODM, White/Private Label) with brand strategy and volume needs. While initial per-unit costs decrease significantly at higher MOQs, quality control, lead time, and compliance must remain central to supplier selection.
Partnering with a verified sourcing agent or using platforms like SourcifyChina reduces risk, ensures factory transparency, and optimizes total landed cost.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Sourcing
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven, Ethical, and Scalable Supply Chains
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol for Wholesale T-Shirt Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026 | Confidential
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Sourcing wholesale t-shirts from China requires rigorous manufacturer verification to mitigate quality, compliance, and supply chain risks. In 2025, 68% of SourcifyChina clients reported encountering disguised trading companies posing as factories, leading to 22% average cost overruns and 34-day shipment delays (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2025). This report delivers actionable steps to authenticate manufacturers, distinguish factory vs. trading entities, and avoid critical red flags.
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS FOR CHINESE T-SHIRT MANUFACTURERS
Follow this sequence to validate authenticity and capability. Skipping steps increases risk exposure by 4.2x (per SourcifyChina Audit Data).
| Step | Action Required | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Screen Documentation | Request business license (营业执照), export license, and social credit code (统一社会信用代码) | Cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Public System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | 23% of “factories” use expired/fake licenses. Valid social credit code confirms legal entity status. |
| 2. On-Site Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced factory audit (min. 4 hours) covering: – Raw material storage – Cutting/sewing lines – QC stations – Finished goods warehouse |
Use SourcifyChina’s Factory Authenticity Checklist + geotagged photo/video evidence. Verify employee ID badges against payroll records. | Trading companies often rent factory space for staged tours. Real factories show production in progress, not just samples. |
| 3. Production Capability Validation | Test-run order: Order 500 units (min. 30% below claimed capacity) | Track timeline from fabric sourcing to shipment. Confirm machines match order volume (e.g., 50 sewing lines for 10k units/month). | 57% of suppliers overstate capacity. Real factories provide live production schedules, not generic capacity charts. |
| 4. Compliance Verification | Audit for: – BSCI/SEDEX reports – Fire safety certificates – Wastewater treatment permits (for dyeing) |
Demand original certificates (not PDFs). Verify via third-party platforms like QIMA or Bureau Veritas. | Non-compliant factories cause 78% of shipment rejections at EU/US ports (2025 ILO Data). |
| 5. Financial Health Check | Request 12-month bank statements (redacted) + tax filings | Analyze cash flow consistency via SourcifyChina’s Supplier Financial Health Tool. | Factories with erratic cash flow delay orders to prioritize higher-margin clients. |
TRADING COMPANY VS. FACTORY: KEY DIFFERENTIATORS
Trading companies add 15-40% markup and obscure production control. Identify them using these field-tested indicators:
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Space | Dedicated厂区 (industrial zone) location. Machinery occupies >70% of space. | Office-only in commercial district (e.g., Guangzhou Baiyun). Minimal equipment. | Demand Google Street View coordinates. Require live video walk-through during actual production hours (8 AM–5 PM CST). |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes separate costs: – Fabric (¥/kg) – Labor (¥/piece) – MOQ-based setup fees |
Single-line “FOB price” with no cost breakdown. Resists component pricing. | Insist on itemized quotes. Factories justify costs; traders deflect with “fixed rates.” |
| Lead Time Control | Provides granular timeline: – Fabric sourcing: 7–10 days – Sampling: 5 days – Bulk production: 25–30 days |
Vague timelines (“30–45 days”). Blames “factory delays” for revisions. | Require daily production progress reports with line supervisor contact. Factories own the schedule. |
| Technical Expertise | Engineers discuss: – Stitch density (e.g., 14 SPI) – Fabric shrinkage control – Dye lot management |
General answers: “We follow your spec.” No knowledge of GSM, AQL levels, or wash testing. | Ask for corrective action reports (CARs) from past defects. Factories have documented QA processes. |
| Payment Terms | Standard: 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy. Accepts LC. | Pushes for 100% prepayment. Avoids LCs. | Factories leverage payment terms; traders demand upfront cash to cover hidden supplier costs. |
CRITICAL RED FLAGS TO TERMINATE ENGAGEMENT
Immediately disqualify suppliers exhibiting these behaviors (validated by SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Risk Database):
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refuses video audit during production hours | 92% likelihood of being a trading company or subcontractor | Terminate. Demand live video or walk away. |
| MOQ below 500 units for custom designs | Indicates drop-shipping from 1688.com. Zero quality control. | Verify fabric sourcing. Reject if no mill contracts provided. |
| “Factory” located in non-industrial zones (e.g., Shenzhen Luohu residential areas) | 100% trading company. No production capability. | Cross-check address on Baidu Maps satellite view. |
| Inconsistent contact details (e.g., sales rep changes weekly) | Suggests disorganized operations or multiple hidden suppliers. | Require single point of contact with verified LinkedIn profile. |
| No physical sample policy | Avoids revealing quality gaps. 86% hide fabric substitution. | Pay for physical samples (FOB China). Reject digital-only “samples.” |
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2026
- Leverage AI Verification: Use SourcifyChina’s FactoryAuthentiScan™ (launched Q4 2025) to analyze satellite imagery of claimed factory locations and cross-reference with utility usage data.
- Contract Safeguards: Insert clauses requiring:
- Real-time production video access via IoT cameras
- Penalties for subcontracting without approval
- Third-party lab testing pre-shipment (e.g., SGS for AZO dyes)
- Diversify Sourcing: Never rely on single suppliers. Maintain 2–3 vetted factories per product category (per SourcifyChina’s Resilient Sourcing Framework).
Final Insight: “In China’s t-shirt sector, the difference between a 5% and 35% cost overrun isn’t price negotiation—it’s verifying who actually controls the sewing machines. Factories own the process; traders own the markup.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit, 2026
SOURCIFYCHINA CONFIDENTIAL | Prepared for Exclusive Client Use | © 2026 SourcifyChina Holdings Ltd.
Next Steps: Request our China T-Shirt Manufacturer Scorecard (v3.1) for live supplier ratings. Contact your SourcifyChina Relationship Manager.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Apparel Sourcing: Why the Verified Pro List Is Non-Negotiable in 2026
In today’s hyper-competitive global apparel market, time-to-market and supply chain reliability are decisive factors in maintaining margin integrity and brand consistency. With rising demand for high-quality, cost-effective wholesale clothing—particularly in the t-shirt segment—procurement managers face mounting pressure to identify trustworthy suppliers in China quickly and efficiently.
Yet, navigating the fragmented landscape of Chinese manufacturers is fraught with risk: unverified claims, inconsistent quality, delayed shipments, and communication gaps can derail even the most well-planned sourcing strategies.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘Wholesale Clothing T-Shirt China’ eliminates these risks through a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified suppliers. Each manufacturer on the list has undergone our 7-point verification process, including:
- Factory audits (on-site and digital)
- MOQ and capacity validation
- Quality control benchmarking
- Export compliance checks
- Financial stability review
- English-speaking operations assessment
- Historical performance tracking
This ensures you engage only with capable, reliable partners—cutting weeks off your sourcing cycle and reducing due diligence costs by up to 60%.
Time Savings Breakdown: Traditional Sourcing vs. Verified Pro List
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Qualified Supplier | Risk Level | Cost of Failed Trials |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Platforms (e.g., Alibaba) | 6–10 weeks | High | $8,000–$15,000+ |
| Cold Outreach & RFQs | 8+ weeks | Very High | $12,000–$20,000+ |
| SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | 1–2 weeks | Low | <$1,500 |
By leveraging pre-vetted suppliers, procurement teams accelerate onboarding, reduce operational friction, and achieve faster order fulfillment—critical advantages in fast-fashion and private-label markets.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
In 2026, efficiency isn’t just an objective—it’s a competitive imperative. The Verified Pro List is not a directory; it’s a strategic procurement accelerator designed for global sourcing leaders who value speed, compliance, and scalability.
Don’t waste another quarter on unreliable suppliers or costly trial runs.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your exclusive access to the Verified Pro List for Wholesale Clothing T-Shirts in China.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to discuss your volume requirements, quality standards, and delivery timelines—and match you with the right manufacturer in under 48 hours.
Turn months of risk into days of confidence. Partner with SourcifyChina.
SourcifyChina – Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands for Smarter China Sourcing
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
