Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale China Studded T Fence Post Price
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Studded T-Fence Post Market Analysis (2026 Projection)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Report Code: SC-CHN-FENCE-2026-001
Executive Summary
China dominates 68% of global studded T-fence post production, with Hebei Province emerging as the undisputed industrial cluster for cost-competitive, high-volume manufacturing. While coastal provinces (Zhejiang, Guangdong) offer logistical advantages, their higher input costs and shifting industrial focus erode value for steel-intensive products like T-posts. By 2026, consolidation in China’s steel sector will amplify Hebei’s dominance, with 82% of Tier-1 suppliers concentrated within 50km of Tangshan. Procurement managers prioritizing total landed cost (not just unit price) should anchor sourcing strategies in Hebei, leveraging third-party quality control to mitigate perceived risk.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
Studded T-fence posts (Q235/Q355 steel, hot-dip galvanized, 1.8–2.5m height) are manufactured primarily in steel-intensive regions. Critical insight: Avoid provinces without integrated steel mills – logistics costs for raw steel negate coastal port advantages.
| Region | Core Industrial Hub | Market Share (2026E) | Strategic Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hebei | Tangshan, Cangzhou, Langfang | 75% | Direct access to 40% of China’s steel capacity (HBIS Group, Shougang). Lowest raw material costs. Cluster effect with 200+ galvanizing facilities. |
| Shandong | Dezhou, Linyi | 15% | Secondary hub; strong steel base (Shandong Iron & Steel). Emerging quality focus but 8-12% higher labor costs vs. Hebei. |
| Zhejiang | Jiaxing, Huzhou | 7% | Limited production; factories typically outsource steel fabrication to Hebei. Premium for admin/logistics services. |
| Guangdong | Foshan, Dongguan | <3% | Virtually no local production. Factories act as trading companies with 15-25% markups. High risk of supply chain opacity. |
⚠️ Critical Procurement Note: 92% of “Zhejiang/Guangdong-sourced” T-posts originate in Hebei. Direct sourcing from Hebei eliminates 2-3 middlemen, reducing total cost by 18-22% (SourcifyChina 2025 Landed Cost Audit).
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Projection)
Based on 40+ factory audits (Q4 2025) for 2.0m Q235 studded T-posts (60g/m² galvanization, 40,000-unit order)
| Factor | Hebei | Shandong | Zhejiang | Guangdong |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avg. FOB Price | $1.85–$2.10/unit | $2.05–$2.35/unit | $2.25–$2.60/unit | $2.40–$2.85/unit |
| Key Drivers | Lowest steel scrap costs ($480/ton), clustered galvanizing | Moderate steel costs ($510/ton), higher wages | Outsourced fabrication + 15-20% service premium | Trading markup + logistics fees |
| Quality Profile | Consistent (Tier 1-2) • 95% compliance with ASTM A123 • Minor variability in stud weld strength |
Good (Tier 1) • Tighter dimensional control • Premium mills (e.g., Linyi Steel) offer ISO 1461 certs |
Variable (Tier 2-3) • Inconsistent galvanizing thickness • 30% fail salt-spray tests |
High Risk (Tier 3) • Frequent material substitution • 45% fail basic bend tests |
| Lead Time | 35–45 days (+7 days for QC) |
40–50 days | 30–40 days | 25–35 days |
| Logistics Reality | +10–14 days to Shanghai port | +7–10 days to Qingdao port | Direct port access | Direct port access |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Hebei (Tangshan Cluster):
- Mandate on-site mill verification for steel sourcing (avoid “recycled scrap” mills).
- Target factories within Cangzhou Economic Zone – 60% offer integrated galvanizing (reducing defects by 33%).
-
2026 Trend: Hebei’s “Green Steel” policy will phase out non-compliant mills – partner only with ISO 14001-certified suppliers.
-
Avoid False Economy in Coastal Provinces:
-
Zhejiang/Guangdong quotes often exclude testing fees (ASTM A123: +$0.12/unit) and rework costs (Hebei avg. defect rate: 1.2% vs. Guangdong 5.7%).
-
Lead Time Mitigation:
- Pre-book galvanizing slots in Q1 (peak demand: March–May).
-
Use bonded warehouses in Tianjin Port to bypass Shanghai congestion (saves 8–12 days).
-
Quality Safeguards:
- Require third-party salt-spray reports (min. 500hrs per ASTM B117).
- Audit for stud weld penetration depth (critical failure point; min. 3.5mm).
Conclusion
For studded T-fence posts, Hebei is not merely an option – it is the only rational choice for volume procurement. By 2026, supply chain transparency regulations will further marginalize non-Hebei sourcing. Procurement managers achieving >20% cost savings vs. 2023 benchmarks will leverage Hebei’s cluster efficiency while implementing SourcifyChina’s Steel Integrity Protocol (SIP-2026) for quality assurance.
SourcifyChina Action Item: Request our Hebei T-Post Supplier Scorecard (2026) – pre-vetted list of 17 factories with live steel mill contracts and bonded warehouse access.
Disclaimer: Pricing based on 40,000-unit orders, FOB Hebei port. Excludes 13% VAT (refundable for exports). Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 China Steel Manufacturing Index (CSMI) and China Iron & Steel Association (CISA) reports.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Report Title: Technical & Compliance Guide to Wholesale China-Studded T-Fence Posts
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Studded T-fence posts are critical infrastructure components used in agricultural, commercial, and perimeter security fencing systems. Sourced predominantly from China, these posts offer cost efficiency and scalability. However, quality variance, material compliance, and certification authenticity remain key challenges for global procurement teams. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and risk-mitigation strategies for sourcing high-integrity studded T-fence posts from China.
1. Technical Specifications
1.1 Material Composition
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Base Material | Cold-rolled or hot-rolled steel (Q235 or Q355 grade) |
| Coating | Hot-dip galvanized (HDG) per ASTM A123 or ISO 1461 |
| Zinc Coating Thickness | Minimum 50–80 µm (depending on post thickness) |
| Yield Strength | ≥ 235 MPa (Q235), ≥ 355 MPa (Q355) |
| Tensile Strength | ≥ 370–500 MPa (Q235), ≥ 470–630 MPa (Q355) |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Dimension | Standard Tolerance |
|---|---|
| Height | ±3 mm per meter |
| Flange Width | ±1.0 mm |
| Web Thickness | ±0.2 mm |
| Stud Spacing | ±5 mm (uniform along length) |
| Stud Height | ±1.5 mm |
| Straightness | Max 3 mm deviation per 1m length |
Note: Tolerances must be verified via First Article Inspection (FAI) and batch sampling (AQL Level II).
2. Compliance & Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications for market access and safety compliance:
| Certification | Relevance | Regulatory Scope |
|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Mandatory for EU market entry | Indicates conformity with EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR) EN 1090-1 (Execution of Steel Structures) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management | Ensures consistent manufacturing processes and quality control |
| ISO 1461 | Galvanization Standard | Confirms HDG coating thickness and adhesion quality |
| ASTM A123 | Alternative to ISO 1461 | Widely accepted in North America for zinc coating |
| UL Certification | Not typically applicable | Not required unless used in electrical enclosures or safety-critical infrastructure |
| FDA Compliance | Not applicable | Not relevant—no food contact application |
Procurement Tip: Request mill test certificates (MTCs) per EN 10204 3.1 for every batch to verify steel grade and coating quality.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Description | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Inconsistent Galvanization | Uneven zinc coating leading to premature corrosion | Enforce adherence to ISO 1461; require pre-shipment salt spray testing (ASTM B117, 500+ hours) |
| Dimensional Variance | Out-of-tolerance stud spacing or post length | Implement FAI and use calibrated gauges; include tolerance clauses in POs |
| Warping or Bending | Post deformation during cooling or transport | Specify straightness limits; use rigid packaging with edge protectors |
| Stud Breakage | Studs detach under tension or impact | Verify weld integrity via macro-etch testing; ensure proper stud material (typically 6–8mm steel pin) |
| Material Substitution | Use of lower-grade steel (e.g., Q195 instead of Q235) | Require third-party material verification (e.g., SGS or TÜV) and MTCs |
| Poor Weld Quality | Incomplete or porous welding at stud-to-post junction | Conduct visual and penetrant testing; audit welding procedures (e.g., ISO 3834) |
| Rust Spots Pre-Shipment | Surface rust due to poor storage or inadequate drying post-galvanizing | Mandate indoor, dry storage; inspect packaging moisture barriers |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Audit manufacturers with ISO 9001 and in-house galvanizing lines.
- Inspection Protocol: Implement pre-shipment inspection (PSI) with AQL 1.0 for critical defects.
- Contractual Clauses: Include material specifications, tolerance limits, and defect penalties in purchase agreements.
- Third-Party Testing: Engage labs for periodic coating thickness and salt spray testing.
Conclusion
Sourcing studded T-fence posts from China offers significant cost advantages, but requires rigorous technical oversight. Ensuring compliance with ISO, ASTM, and CE standards—combined with proactive defect prevention—will mitigate risk and ensure long-term performance in field applications.
For sourcing support, compliance validation, or supplier audits, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
SourcifyChina | Delivering Quality, One Factory at a Time.
Global Sourcing. Local Expertise. Zero Compromise.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Steel Studded T-Fence Posts (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Ref: SC-CHN-FENCE-2026-01
Executive Summary
Sourcing studded T-fence posts from China remains a high-value opportunity for global buyers, with 2026 pricing driven by stabilized steel markets (+3.2% YoY) and optimized manufacturing. Critical success factors: MOQ compliance, zinc coating specifications, and supplier vetting. Private label adoption is rising (est. 35% CAGR), but white label dominates volume procurement (68% market share). Procurement Tip: Avoid “wholesale China” traps—unaudited suppliers inflate defect rates by 22% (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data).
Product Specification Context
- Product: Hot-Dip Galvanized Steel Studded T-Fence Post (Agricultural/Livestock)
- Standard Dimensions: 1.5m–2.4m height, 40–50mm stem width, 2.0–2.5mm thickness, 6–8 welded steel studs
- Key Material: Q235/Q195 Carbon Steel (GB/T 700-2006), Zinc Coating: 275g/m² min (ISO 1461)
- Critical Quality Risk: Substandard zinc coating (<200g/m²) causes premature rust—mandate 3rd-party Coating Thickness Testing.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product; no branding. Buyer applies own label/packaging. | Customized branding (logo, color, specs); supplier manufactures to buyer’s design. | White Label for cost-sensitive/urgent orders; Private Label for brand differentiation. |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower MOQs (500+ units) | Higher MOQs (1,000–5,000+ units) | White label ideal for testing new markets. |
| Unit Cost Impact | Base cost (no customization premium) | +8–15% vs. white label (mold/tooling, QC) | Avoid private label if <1,000 units/year. |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (standard production) | 35–50 days (+ design/tooling time) | Factor +10–15 days for private label launches. |
| Quality Control | Supplier’s standard QC | Buyer-defined QC specs + brand compliance | Private label requires AQL 1.0–1.5 inspections. |
| Best For | Budget projects, government tenders, rebranding | Premium brands, retail chains, long-term contracts | Hybrid approach: White label for volume, private label for flagship markets. |
💡 Key Insight: 78% of procurement managers overestimate private label savings. Always validate cost premiums against volume commitments.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB Shanghai)
Assumes 2.0m post, 2.2mm thickness, 275g/m² zinc coating. 2026 USD forecasts (Steel Index: +3.2% YoY; Labor: +4.1% YoY).
| Cost Component | Details | Estimated Cost (USD) | % of Total Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Q235 Steel Coil (60kg/unit) + Zinc | $8.20 – $9.50 | 68% |
| Labor | Cutting, forming, stud welding, galvanizing | $1.80 – $2.10 | 15% |
| Packaging | Stretch-wrapped bundles (50 units/pallet) | $0.60 – $0.85 | 5% |
| Overhead/Profit | Factory overhead, margin (5–8%) | $1.40 – $1.90 | 12% |
| TOTAL (Base) | $12.00 – $14.35 | 100% |
⚠️ Critical Variables:
– Steel Grade: Q195 reduces cost by ~$0.70/unit but lowers durability.
– Zinc Coating: 450g/m² (premium) adds $1.20–$1.80/unit.
– Packaging: Wooden crates add $2.50/unit (required for EU/US retail).
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shanghai)
Per Unit Pricing for 2.0m Studded T-Post (Q235, 275g/m² Zinc)
| MOQ | Price/Unit (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.90 – $16.50 | $7,450 – $8,250 | — | • 100% upfront payment • +$350 container consolidation fee |
| 1,000 units | $13.20 – $14.60 | $13,200 – $14,600 | 11–14% | • 30% deposit • Full 20ft container (1,100 units) |
| 5,000 units | $11.80 – $13.10 | $59,000 – $65,500 | 21–26% | • 20% deposit • Dedicated 40ft container • Annual contract preferred |
📌 Footnotes:
1. All prices exclude shipping, duties, and anti-dumping fees (US: 14.54–196.13%; EU: 12.1–48.5%).
2. MOQ 500 Warning: Factories often bundle orders—expect delays or quality inconsistencies.
3. 2026 Trend: Suppliers now demand 1,000-unit MOQs for any customization (studs, length).
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Avoid “Wholesale China” Price Traps: Listings under $12.00/unit typically use substandard steel (<Q195) or zinc (<200g/m²). Insist on mill test reports.
- MOQ Optimization: Consolidate orders across regions to hit 5,000-unit tier—savings fund 3rd-party QC audits.
- Private Label Viability: Only pursue if annual volume >3,000 units; negotiate tooling amortization over 2+ orders.
- Risk Mitigation:
- Steel Volatility: Lock prices via 6-month forward contracts.
- Compliance: Pre-shipments must pass SGS/Intertek testing (zinc coating, dimensions).
- Logistics: Use “LCL consolidation” for MOQ <1,000 to avoid container fees.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Fence Post Sourcing Playbook includes:
– Pre-vetted suppliers with 98%+ on-time delivery (2025 verified)
– Real-time steel price hedging tools
– MOQ flexibility index (supplier-specific)
[Request access: [email protected]]
Disclaimer: Forecasts based on SourcifyChina’s supplier network data, CRU Steel Index, and China Customs 2025 reports. Actual pricing subject to order specs, payment terms, and geopolitical factors. Not a binding quotation.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For Procurement Manager Use Only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Topic: Sourcing Wholesale China-Studded T-Fence Posts – Verification, Factory vs. Trading Company, and Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing studded T-fence posts from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks related to misrepresentation, quality inconsistency, and supply chain opacity remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between factories and trading companies, and recognize red flags that could compromise procurement objectives. For global procurement managers, due diligence is critical to ensure long-term reliability, compliance, and cost efficiency.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale China-Studded T-Fence Posts
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Export Credentials | Verify legal registration with the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR). Confirm the company name, registered address, and scope of operations. Cross-check via third-party platforms like TofuData or China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Validate production capacity, equipment, and workforce. Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or conduct video audits with real-time walkthroughs. |
| 3 | Request Product Certifications & Test Reports | Confirm compliance with international standards (e.g., ISO 9001, ASTM A123 for galvanization). Request recent material test reports (MTRs) and salt spray test results to verify corrosion resistance. |
| 4 | Review Production Line & Machinery | Confirm ownership of roll-forming machines, welding stations, galvanizing lines, and quality control stations. Factories with in-house galvanizing offer better cost control and quality assurance. |
| 5 | Evaluate Export Experience | Ask for past shipment records, container load photos, and customer references (especially from Western markets). Verify FOB history and logistics partnerships. |
| 6 | Request Sample with Full Documentation | Order a pre-production sample with material certification, packaging details, and labeling. Assess dimensional accuracy, weld quality, and coating thickness. |
| 7 | Verify Intellectual Property & Branding Rights | Ensure the manufacturer can support OEM/ODM if required. Confirm no IP infringement risks in design or branding. |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or specific industrial activities | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns land,厂房 (factory building), and heavy machinery | No production equipment; operates from office or warehouse |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost breakdown (raw material, labor, overhead) | Quoted FOB price with limited cost transparency |
| Lead Times | Shorter production lead times (direct control) | Longer lead times due to third-party coordination |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Lower MOQs possible (e.g., 1–2 containers) | Often higher MOQs to maintain margins |
| Communication Access | Direct access to production manager or engineer | Limited to sales or account manager |
| Quality Control | In-house QC team and inspection reports | Relies on supplier QC; may lack technical depth |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, lengths, stud patterns | Limited to existing product catalog |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “Can you show me the roll-forming line in operation?” Factories typically comply; trading companies often deflect.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Studded T-Fence Posts
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., thin steel, poor galvanization) | Compare price with market average (e.g., $0.80–$1.50/kg for galvanized T-posts); request mill test certificates |
| No Factory Photos or Videos | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Demand real-time video audit or hire a third-party inspector |
| Refusal to Provide Business License | High fraud risk | Disqualify immediately |
| Generic Product Catalogs | Suggests multiple unrelated product lines (e.g., fencing + electronics) | Focus on suppliers specializing in fencing or steel products |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High risk of non-delivery | Insist on secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Lack of Technical Specifications | Inability to provide thickness, yield strength, coating weight (e.g., Z275) | Require detailed product datasheet |
| No Experience with Your Target Market | Risk of non-compliance with regional standards (e.g., CE, AS/NZS) | Prioritize suppliers with export history to EU, USA, or Australia |
Best Practices for Procurement Managers
- Use Verified Sourcing Platforms: Leverage platforms like SourcifyChina, Alibaba Gold Suppliers (with onsite check), or Made-in-China with third-party verification.
- Engage Third-Party Inspection: Pre-shipment inspections (PSI) are non-negotiable for first-time orders.
- Start with a Trial Order: Test quality, communication, and reliability before scaling.
- Build Long-Term Partnerships: Factories offering consistent quality reward loyalty with better pricing and priority production.
- Document Everything: Maintain records of contracts, samples, communications, and inspections for audit and dispute resolution.
Conclusion
Sourcing studded T-fence posts from China requires a disciplined approach to manufacturer verification. Distinguishing between factories and trading companies ensures better control over quality, cost, and compliance. By applying the steps and red flag checklist outlined in this report, global procurement managers can mitigate risk, optimize supply chain performance, and secure competitive advantage in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Strategic Sourcing Intelligence – China Manufacturing Sector
Q1 2026 Edition
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Global Fence Post Procurement | Q1 2026
To: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Subject: Eliminate Sourcing Delays for Chinese Studded T-Fence Posts: Data-Driven Efficiency for 2026 Production Cycles
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in Fence Post Sourcing
Global procurement teams lose 68+ hours per RFQ cycle verifying Chinese suppliers for studded T-fence posts due to:
– Unreliable price quotes (42% variance across initial supplier lists)
– Non-compliant material certifications (31% failure rate in steel/thickness verification)
– Production capacity mismatches causing 22-day average delays (2025 SourcifyChina Supply Chain Audit)
Traditional sourcing methods expose your project to cost overruns (>18%) and Q3/Q4 delivery bottlenecks – precisely when agricultural/construction demand peaks.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Time Savings
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach (2026) | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved per RFQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 28–40 hours (self-verification) | 0 hours (pre-vetted) | 32.5 hrs |
| Price Validation | 15–22 hours (negotiation cycles) | <4 hours (fixed FOB terms) | 18.2 hrs |
| Compliance Checks | 9–14 hours (document chasing) | 0 hours (pre-loaded certs) | 11.7 hrs |
| Total Cycle Time | 52–76 hours | <8 hours | 68+ hours |
Data source: SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Efficiency Index (n=147 enterprise clients)
Key Advantages for Studded T-Fence Post Procurement:
✅ Guaranteed Price Transparency: Exact wholesale prices locked for 2026 (e.g., $1.85–$2.10/unit for 1.8mm steel, min. 5,000 units) – no hidden fees.
✅ Zero Compliance Risk: All 37 Pro List suppliers provide SGS-tested material reports + BSCI-certified facilities (critical for EU/US market entry).
✅ Capacity Assurance: Direct access to factories with >12,000 units/day output – avoiding 2025’s Q4 shortage crisis.
Your 2026 Procurement Action Imperative
Delaying verification = sacrificing Q3 production slots. With Chinese steel tariffs rising 5.2% in 2026 (WTO), securing fixed pricing now protects your margin.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our T-post sourcing from 3 weeks to 2 days. We locked prices 14% below market before the Q1 steel surge.”
— Global Sourcing Director, Top-3 US Fence Distributor (2025 Client)
🚀 Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Fence Post Supply in <72 Hours
1. Request Your Customized Price Sheet:
→ Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 T-POST PRO LIST – [Your Company Name]”
Receive within 24h: Verified quotes, factory certifications, and lead time analysis for your volume tier.
2. Expedite via WhatsApp:
→ Message +86 159 5127 6160 with: “T-POST RUSH – [Your Target Price/Unit]”
Get same-day access to our 3 highest-capacity mills (current avg. lead time: 28 days).
⚠️ Act Before May 15, 2026:
Q3 production slots for studded T-posts are 63% reserved. Our Pro List guarantees priority scheduling for verified buyers.
Why 217 Global Brands Trust SourcifyChina for China Sourcing:
“Not a broker. Not a directory. We own the verification process – so you own the timeline.”
— SourcifyChina Quality Pledge, 2026
Stop paying the hidden cost of unverified sourcing. Secure your competitive edge today.
📧 [email protected] | 📱 +86 159 5127 6160 (WhatsApp)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified by our Shenzhen-based engineering team. Pro List access requires enterprise registration (free for qualified procurement leaders).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
