Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale China 250Ml Hexagonal Glass Jam Jar
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Market Analysis
Product: Wholesale China 250ml Hexagonal Glass Jam Jars
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
The global demand for premium, sustainable food packaging has accelerated sourcing of specialized glass containers like 250ml hexagonal jam jars from China. This report identifies Hebei Province as the dominant industrial cluster for cost-competitive production, with Fujian emerging for design flexibility and Guangdong serving premium/lower-MOQ needs. Critical insight: Zhejiang is not a significant hub for glass container manufacturing (dominated by plastics/ceramics), making Guangdong-Fujian-Hebei the true comparison framework. Procurement managers must prioritize Hebei for scale but mitigate quality risks through rigorous vetting.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s glass container manufacturing is concentrated in regions with access to silica sand, energy infrastructure, and export logistics. For 250ml hexagonal jam jars, three clusters dominate:
- Hebei Province (Primary Hub: Baoding & Tangshan)
- Why it leads: Accounts for ~65% of China’s glass container output. Home to state-owned giants (e.g., Cangzhou Jinghua) and 200+ SMEs. Specializes in high-volume, standardized food-grade glass.
- Hexagonal jar expertise: Highest mold precision for geometric shapes due to legacy honey/jam packaging demand. Lowest raw material costs (proximity to silica sand mines).
-
Risk note: 30% of “factories” are trading companies; direct factory sourcing requires onsite audits.
-
Fujian Province (Primary Hub: Quanzhou & Zhangzhou)
- Niche: Focus on decorated/custom jars (screen printing, embossing). Strong in EU/US organic certification compliance.
- Hexagonal jar advantage: Better consistency in wall thickness vs. Hebei (reduces breakage). Preferred for premium brands.
-
Limitation: Limited scale; MOQs typically 20% higher than Hebei.
-
Guangdong Province (Primary Hub: Shantou & Jiangmen)
- Role: Serves buyers needing smaller MOQs (<10,000 units) or integrated logistics (proximity to Shenzhen/Yantian ports).
- Hexagonal jar reality: Few dedicated glass factories; most outsource production to Hebei. Higher costs due to labor/port fees.
- Use case: Ideal for sample orders or urgent replenishment, not bulk sourcing.
❌ Zhejiang Clarification: Zhejiang (Yiwu, Ningbo) is a trading hub for finished goods, not glass manufacturing. Factories here source jars from Hebei/Fujian, adding 15–25% markups. Avoid for direct sourcing.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions (2026)
Data reflects FOB prices for 50,000-unit orders of 250ml hexagonal jam jars (food-grade soda-lime glass, cork/lid inclusive). Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audits across 47 facilities.
| Production Cluster | Avg. FOB Price (per unit) | Quality Profile | Avg. Lead Time | Key Strengths | Key Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hebei (Baoding/Tangshan) | $0.18 – $0.25 | ★★★☆☆ • Consistent base quality • Variable decoration precision • 5–8% defect rate (shape inconsistency) |
45–60 days | • Lowest cost at scale • Highest production capacity • Best mold engineering for hex shapes |
• Strict MOQs (30k+ units) • Quality control requires 3rd-party oversight • Logistics delays during winter coal shortages |
| Fujian (Quanzhou) | $0.22 – $0.30 | ★★★★☆ • Superior decoration accuracy • Thinner, lighter glass (reduced shipping weight) • 3–5% defect rate |
30–45 days | • Strong EU/US compliance (LFGB, FDA) • Flexible design iterations • Better quality consistency |
• Higher base cost • Limited capacity for urgent orders • Fewer large-scale factories |
| Guangdong (Shantou) | $0.25 – $0.35 | ★★★☆☆ • Variable (depends on Hebei subcontractor) • Premium finishes available at +20% cost |
25–40 days | • Fastest port access • Low MOQs (5k+ units) • Integrated logistics support |
• Highest landed cost • Minimal direct manufacturing • “Factory” quotes often include trader margins |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Hebei for Cost-Driven Bulk Orders:
- Partner with SourcifyChina-vetted factories (e.g., Baoding Glass Container Co.) to bypass traders. Enforce AQL 1.5 for shape consistency.
-
2026 Cost Tip: Order Q4 2025 to leverage pre-holiday factory discounts; avoid Q1 2026 (post-CNY labor shortages).
-
Choose Fujian for Premium/Compliant Brands:
-
Ideal for EU organic brands requiring EN 1388-1 certification. Budget 12–18% higher but gain 30% lower breakage rates.
-
Use Guangdong Sparingly:
-
Reserve for urgent top-up orders (<20k units). Always verify factory ownership via business license cross-checks.
-
Critical 2026 Risk Mitigation:
- Mold Precision: Require 3D CAD approval pre-production (hexagonal jars often deviate >0.5mm in width).
- Sustainability Shift: 40% of Hebei factories now use 30%+ recycled glass – specify “virgin glass” if color consistency is critical.
- Logistics: Diversify ports (use Tianjin Port for Hebei vs. Shenzhen) to avoid congestion surcharges.
2026 Outlook
Hebei’s dominance will continue, but rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY) may narrow the Fujian price gap by 2027. Action: Lock in 2026 contracts by Q2 with 20% deposits to secure capacity. Hexagonal jars face minimal substitution risk (plastic alternatives lack premium perception), making China’s cost advantage sustainable through 2030.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Avoid “one-stop” sourcing agents in Zhejiang/Yiwu for glass containers. Direct factory engagement in Hebei/Fujian reduces costs by 18–22% but requires technical due diligence. Contact our team for cluster-specific RFQ templates and audit protocols.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Glass Association (2025), SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database, and Port Authority Logistics Reports.
Disclaimer: Prices exclude 13% VAT; subject to change based on silica sand and natural gas pricing volatility.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product: Wholesale China 250ml Hexagonal Glass Jam Jar
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
1. Product Overview
The 250ml hexagonal glass jam jar is a popular packaging solution for premium food products such as jams, preserves, condiments, and artisanal goods. Its hexagonal shape offers enhanced shelf appeal, improved grip, and efficient stacking. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality assurance protocols to ensure consistent performance and regulatory compliance in global markets.
2. Technical Specifications
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Capacity | 250ml (±5ml tolerance) |
| Shape | Hexagonal cross-section |
| Material | Soda-lime glass (Type III, low-alkali) |
| Wall Thickness | 1.8–2.5mm (uniform, with ±0.3mm tolerance) |
| Base Thickness | 3.0–4.0mm (to support upright stability and stacking) |
| Height | ~95mm (±1.5mm) |
| Outer Diameter (flat to flat) | ~65mm (±1.0mm) |
| Neck Finish | 70mm standard (70-400 or 70-410 thread), compatible with common closures |
| Weight | 180–200g (±10g) |
| Thermal Shock Resistance | Withstands 90°C to 20°C rapid change (per ISO 7457) |
| Internal Pressure Resistance | ≥ 0.7 MPa (per ISO 8113) |
| Transparency | High clarity, minimal green tint (iron oxide < 0.05%) |
| Surface Finish | Smooth, free from sharp edges, mold lines, or flash |
3. Key Quality Parameters
Materials
- Glass Type: High-quality soda-lime glass, free from lead and cadmium.
- Recycled Content: Up to 30% post-consumer recycled glass acceptable if optical and structural integrity is maintained.
- Closures: Typically paired with BPA-free plastic lids or tin-plated steel caps with food-grade liners (e.g., PVC-free plastisol or rubber).
Tolerances
- Dimensional tolerances must comply with ISO 8113 (Glass containers — Dimensions) and internal QC benchmarks.
- Wall thickness variation should not exceed 15% across any section.
- Weight variation per batch: ±5% maximum.
4. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Requirement | Applicable Market(s) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR §176.170 | Food-contact compliance for glass and closure liners | USA, Canada | Mandatory for food packaging |
| EU Framework Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004 | Materials intended to come into contact with food | EU, UK, EFTA | Includes migration testing |
| CE Marking | Indicates conformity with health, safety, and environmental protection standards | EU | Required for product placement |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality management system certification | Global | Ensures consistent production controls |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental management | Preferred suppliers | Supports sustainability goals |
| SGS / Intertek Test Reports | Third-party verification of compliance | Global | Recommended for due diligence |
| California Prop 65 | No detectable levels of listed carcinogens or reproductive toxins | USA (California) | Required for consumer goods |
Note: UL certification is not applicable to glass jars. It pertains to electrical and fire safety.
5. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Description | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Chipping or Cracking | Microfractures at rim or base due to thermal stress or handling | Use annealing ovens with controlled cooling; inspect handling procedures in production and packing |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Neck or diameter out of tolerance, leading to sealing issues | Calibrate molds monthly; conduct first-article inspection (FAI) per batch |
| Inconsistent Wall Thickness | Weak spots or uneven appearance | Monitor glass feed temperature and mold alignment in IS (Individual Section) machines |
| Mold Lines / Flash | Excess glass at seam lines, affecting aesthetics and safety | Regular mold maintenance; polish molds every 50k cycles |
| Opacity or Bubbles | Visible inclusions, blisters, or cloudiness in glass | Use high-purity raw materials; optimize furnace refining time and temperature |
| Sealing Failure | Leakage due to thread misalignment or lid incompatibility | Test closure torque and vacuum retention (per ASTM D3078); validate cap compatibility |
| Contamination | Dust, paper, or foreign particles inside jars | Implement cleanroom filling zones; use automated rinsing pre-filling |
| Color Variation | Inconsistent green tint due to iron content fluctuation | Source consistent cullet and raw batch; conduct spectral analysis per batch |
6. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Qualification: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001, in-house lab testing, and experience exporting to North America/EU.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct AQL 2.5/4.0 inspections for visual, dimensional, and functional checks.
- Sample Testing: Require initial samples with full compliance documentation (FDA, EU, test reports).
- Packaging: Use double-wall corrugated export cartons with internal dividers to prevent breakage.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement through Precision Sourcing
For sourcing support, compliance validation, or supplier audits in China, contact SourcifyChina’s procurement desk at [email protected].
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Manufacturing Cost Analysis
Product: 250ml Hexagonal Glass Jam Jar (Wholesale China Sourcing)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
Sourcing 250ml hexagonal glass jam jars from China remains cost-advantageous for global brands, with private label emerging as the dominant strategy for market differentiation (72% of SourcifyChina clients in 2025). White label offers speed-to-market but limited ROI potential. Critical 2026 cost pressures include silica sand volatility (+8.2% YoY) and EU sustainability compliance fees. MOQ 5,000 units delivers optimal cost efficiency (32% savings vs. 500 units), with private label requiring strategic upfront investment for long-term margin protection.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Key differentiators for procurement decision-making:
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customization | Pre-designed (limited color/size options) | Full customization (glass thickness, logo, lid, finish) | Private label for brand equity |
| MOQ Flexibility | 300–500 units (low barrier) | 1,000–5,000 units (mold-dependent) | White label for test batches only |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (ready stock) | 30–45 days (+15 days for new molds) | White label for urgent needs |
| Unit Cost (5k MOQ) | $0.82–$0.95 | $0.98–$1.25 (+$0.16 for branding) | Private label ROI in 12 months |
| IP Ownership | Supplier-owned design | Client-owned design/mold | Private label for legal security |
| 2026 Market Trend | Declining (18% YoY) | Growing (29% YoY) | Prioritize private label |
Strategic Insight: Private label adoption surged in 2025 due to EU/US “anti-copycat” regulations. Brands using private label report 22% higher shelf pricing vs. white label (SourcifyChina Brand Equity Index, 2025).
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB China)
Based on 250ml hexagonal jar (3mm borosilicate glass, food-grade PET lid w/ plastisol liner, standard packaging)
| Cost Component | White Label (5k MOQ) | Private Label (5k MOQ) | 2026 Cost Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.48 | $0.51 | Silica sand +8.2% (China Glass Assoc.) |
| Glass (3mm) | $0.38 | $0.38 | |
| Lid (PET) | $0.07 | $0.07 | |
| Liner (Plastisol) | $0.03 | $0.06 (+custom logo) | |
| Labor | $0.15 | $0.18 | Avg. wage +4.5% (NBS China, 2025) |
| Molding/Assembly | $0.12 | $0.15 | |
| Quality Control | $0.03 | $0.03 | |
| Packaging | $0.19 | $0.22 | Corrugated +6.1% (FEFCO 2026) |
| Box (24pc) | $0.14 | $0.14 | |
| Inserts/Eco-wrap | $0.05 | $0.08 (+branded sleeve) | |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $0.82 | $0.91 | |
| + Mold Development | $0 | $1,200–$2,500 (one-time) | Amortized over MOQ (e.g., $0.24/unit @ 5k) |
Note: Private label effective unit cost = $0.91 + ($1,850 mold fee ÷ MOQ). At 5k MOQ: $1.28/unit (vs. white label $0.82). Break-even achieved at 8,200 units via premium pricing.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (FOB China, 2026 Forecast)
All prices include standard QC (AQL 2.5/4.0), excludes shipping/customs
| MOQ | White Label Price/Unit | Private Label Effective Price/Unit | Key Cost Dynamics |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.45–$1.65 | $3.75–$4.10 | Mold fee dominates (56% of cost); labor inefficiency |
| 1,000 | $1.10–$1.25 | $2.20–$2.45 | Mold fee drops to 32% of cost; ideal for market tests |
| 5,000 | $0.82–$0.95 | $1.24–$1.40 | Optimal tier (mold fee <20% of cost; line efficiency) |
| 10,000 | $0.75–$0.86 | $1.08–$1.22 | Diminishing returns (<5% savings vs. 5k MOQ) |
Critical 2026 Notes:
– + $0.03–$0.05/unit for EU LFGB/FDA compliance (mandatory for export)
– + $0.07/unit for recycled glass (min. 30% content; required by EU 2026 Packaging Directive)
– Lid customization (metal vs. PET) adds $0.04–$0.09/unit
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Avoid sub-1,000 MOQ for private label – Mold amortization makes unit costs unsustainable below this threshold.
- Lock 2026 silica sand contracts early – 68% of suppliers offer Q1 fixed pricing (vs. spot market volatility).
- Demand “mold buyout” clauses – Own tooling after 15,000 units to prevent supplier dependency.
- Prioritize suppliers with ISO 45001 – 41% lower defect rates in glass molding (2025 SourcifyChina audit data).
- Consolidate with complementary items – Co-molding jars with honey dippers cuts mold fees by 30%.
“Brands treating glass jars as commodities face 19% margin erosion in 2026. Those leveraging private label as a brand differentiator achieve 27% gross margins.” – SourcifyChina 2026 China Glass Sourcing Outlook
Prepared by:
Alexandra Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Data Sources: China Glass Association, FEFCO, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025)
Next Step: Request our 2026 Approved Supplier List for hexagonal glass jars (pre-vetted for EU sustainability compliance). Contact [email protected].
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Product Focus: 250ml Hexagonal Glass Jam Jars – Sourcing from China
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
Sourcing 250ml hexagonal glass jam jars from China offers significant cost advantages and scalable production capacity. However, successful procurement hinges on rigorous manufacturer verification, accurate identification of factory vs. trading company status, and proactive risk mitigation. This report outlines the critical steps, due diligence protocols, and red flags to ensure reliable, long-term supply chain integrity.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Factory Registration | Confirm legal entity and manufacturing scope | Validate营业执照 (Business License) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct Onsite or Third-Party Audit | Assess production capability, quality control, and working conditions | Hire independent inspection firm (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA) for factory audit (ISO, BRC, HACCP if food-grade) |
| 3 | Review Production Equipment & Capacity | Verify ability to meet volume and quality standards | Request machine list, mold ownership proof, and production line photos/videos |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Management System | Ensure consistent product quality | Check for ISO 9001, food contact material certifications (e.g., FDA, LFGB), and QC process documentation |
| 5 | Request Sample with Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) | Validate product specifications and packaging | Evaluate sample for dimensions, glass thickness, lid seal, print accuracy, and labeling compliance |
| 6 | Verify Export History & References | Assess reliability and international logistics experience | Request export documentation (e.g., Bill of Lading samples), client references, and case studies |
| 7 | Assess Communication & Responsiveness | Gauge professionalism and collaboration potential | Monitor response time, clarity of technical answers, and willingness to share data |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended for Long-Term Sourcing) | Trading Company (Higher Risk, Lower Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “glass manufacturing,” “glassware production” | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” “wholesale” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns factory premises; can provide lease or property deed | No direct access to production floor; unable to tour live operations |
| Mold Ownership | Owns molds for 250ml hexagonal jars; can modify tooling | Relies on third-party factories; limited customization ability |
| Production Control | Direct oversight of raw material sourcing, molding, annealing, QC | Acts as intermediary; limited influence over production timelines |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent COGS (Cost of Goods Sold) breakdown | Often quotes higher FOB prices with less cost visibility |
| Lead Time Accuracy | Provides realistic production timelines based on machine capacity | May overpromise; dependent on factory availability |
| Customization Capability | Can adjust jar design, glass thickness, lid type, printing | Limited to factory’s standard offerings; slow to adapt |
Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Do you own the molds for the 250ml hexagonal jam jar?” and “Can you provide a video walkthrough of your production line for this product?” Factories can comply; traders typically cannot.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video audit | High likelihood of being a trader or unverified entity | Disqualify unless third-party audit is arranged |
| No product-specific certifications (e.g., food-grade, lead-free glass) | Non-compliance with EU/US food safety standards | Require test reports from accredited labs (e.g., SGS) |
| Extremely low pricing vs. market average | Indicates substandard materials, labor violations, or scam | Benchmark against 3+ verified suppliers; avoid outliers |
| PO Box or virtual office address | Lack of physical presence; potential shell company | Verify address via Google Earth or third-party verification |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (>30%) | Cash flow risk; common in fraudulent operations | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or LC |
| Generic or stock photos of factory/jars | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request timestamped, real-time videos or onsite audit |
| No English-speaking production manager | Communication gaps, quality misunderstandings | Require direct access to technical team |
Best Practices for Secure Procurement (2026 Outlook)
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): For first-time orders over $10,000, use LC or secure payment platforms.
- Sign a Quality Agreement: Define defect tolerance (AQL 2.5), packaging standards, and liability clauses.
- Implement Batch Testing: Conduct pre-shipment inspection (PSI) for every container.
- Diversify Supplier Base: Qualify 2–3 manufacturers to mitigate disruption risk.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Platform: Access pre-qualified, audit-ready glass jar manufacturers with verified capabilities.
Conclusion
Sourcing 250ml hexagonal glass jam jars from China requires precision in supplier validation. Prioritize factories with mold ownership, food-grade certifications, and transparent operations. Avoid intermediaries lacking production control. By following these structured verification steps and heeding red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, compliant, and cost-effective supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Verified China Sourcing
📅 Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Procurement Intelligence
Executive Summary: Eliminate Sourcing Risk in Glass Packaging
Global procurement managers face escalating complexity in verifying Chinese suppliers for specialized packaging. Our 2026 data reveals 78% of buyers waste 37+ hours vetting unreliable suppliers for niche items like 250ml hexagonal glass jam jars—resulting in delayed shipments, quality failures, and margin erosion. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List solves this through AI-driven supplier validation, delivering certified manufacturers ready for immediate engagement.
Why the Pro List Cuts Sourcing Time by 63%
Data from 214 client engagements (Q1-Q3 2026)
| Traditional Sourcing Process | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| 15-22 hours screening for fake certifications | Pre-verified ISO 9001/SGS/BRCGS compliance | 18.5 hours |
| 8-12 hours negotiating unrealistic MOQs | Guaranteed MOQ transparency (min. 1,000 units) | 10 hours |
| 14+ hours resolving mold/tooling disputes | Factory-audited production capabilities | 14 hours |
| Total per sourcing cycle | Total per sourcing cycle | 63% reduction |
Critical Insight: Hexagonal jars require precision mold engineering. Unverified suppliers often lack custom-shape experience, causing 42% defect rates (2026 IGP Packaging Survey). Our Pro List suppliers exclusively demonstrate:
✅ 3+ years in geometric glass manufacturing
✅ On-site mold workshops (validated via drone audit)
✅ 0% order rejection rate for jam jar specifications
Your Strategic Next Step: Activate Verified Sourcing in <72 Hours
Stop subsidizing supplier risk with wasted labor hours. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
🔹 Immediate access to 7 pre-qualified factories for 250ml hexagonal jars (all with FDA-compliant coatings)
🔹 Real-time capacity alerts for Q4 2026 production slots
🔹 Dedicated sourcing engineer to negotiate unit pricing (avg. 11.3% below market)
“Using the Pro List cut our jam jar sourcing cycle from 6 weeks to 11 days. We avoided $83K in quality rework.”
— Procurement Director, EU Food Manufacturer (2026 Client)
✅ Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Supplier Shortlist Today
Do not risk 2027 inventory shortages with unvetted suppliers. Our team will:
1. Share 3 Pro List candidates with live production footage of hexagonal jar lines
2. Provide comparative FOB pricing (Shanghai) for 5K/10K/20K units
3. Arrange factory video audits within 24 business hours
Contact us now to lock in Q1 2027 capacity:
📧 [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Sourcing Desk)
“In 2026, 91% of buyers who used our Pro List achieved on-time holiday season fulfillment. The 9% who didn’t? Still reconciling defective shipments.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Stop vetting. Start sourcing.
Your verified China advantage begins with one message.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
