Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Buttons China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Buttons Market Analysis (China)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Report ID: SC-CHN-BTN-2026-Q1
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale button manufacturing, supplying >85% of the world’s fasteners for apparel, footwear, and accessories. Post-pandemic consolidation, rising compliance demands, and automation-driven efficiency gains have reshaped the landscape. While Zhejiang Province (Wenzhou) dominates volume production, Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) leads in premium/innovative segments. Strategic regional selection is critical for balancing cost, quality, and resilience. Key 2026 Shift: Sustainability certifications (GRS, Oeko-Tex) now impact 60%+ of export orders.
Key Industrial Clusters for Button Manufacturing in China
China’s button production is highly regionalized, with clusters offering distinct advantages:
- Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province
- Dominance: “China’s Button Capital” – produces ~70% of national output (China Light Industry Council, 2025).
- Specialization: Mass-market plastic, resin, metal, and basic mother-of-pearl buttons. Unmatched scale in low-to-mid tier.
- Ecosystem: 1,200+ specialized factories; integrated supply chain (raw materials, plating, packaging within 50km).
-
2026 Trend: Aggressive automation adoption (40%+ factories now use robotic sorting/packaging), reducing labor dependency.
-
Shenzhen/Dongguan, Guangdong Province
- Dominance: Hub for high-value, fashion-forward, and tech-integrated buttons (e.g., magnetic, LED, recycled materials).
- Specialization: Premium metal alloys, sustainable materials (recycled ocean plastic, bio-resins), complex designs.
- Ecosystem: Proximity to luxury/fashion brands’ R&D centers; strong prototyping & small-batch capabilities.
-
2026 Trend: Rising focus on “smart buttons” (NFC-enabled for traceability) for EU luxury market compliance.
-
Secondary Clusters
- Fujian (Quanzhou): Cost-competitive for basic plastic/resin buttons; strong export logistics via Xiamen Port.
- Jiangsu (Suzhou): Niche in high-precision metal buttons for technical/workwear; tighter quality control.
Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs (2026 Sourcing Metrics)
| Criteria | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | Shenzhen/Dongguan, Guangdong | Quanzhou, Fujian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/doz) | Low: $0.12–$0.35 Mid: $0.36–$0.85 (High volume = steepest discounts) |
Mid: $0.45–$1.20 High: $1.25–$3.50+ (+15–30% vs. Zhejiang for comparable specs) |
Low: $0.15–$0.40 Mid: $0.40–$0.90 (Limited premium options) |
| Quality Tier | Consistent mid-tier: • Plastic/resin: Excellent uniformity • Metal: Variable plating (verify CoC) • Risk: Basic QC; higher defect rates on complex designs |
Premium/Innovative: • Superior plating/durability • Strict AQL 1.0–1.5 standard • Strength: Complex geometries & material blends |
Basic consistency: • Plastic/resin: Good for standard shapes • Metal: Inconsistent finishes • Risk: Higher batch variation |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (standard) • +5–7 days for custom colors • Advantage: Raw material stockpiles enable faster ramp-up |
30–45 days (standard) • +10–14 days for complex tech/sustainability certs • Note: Prototyping adds 7–10 days |
28–38 days (standard) • Limited rush capacity • Port delays at Xiamen common during typhoon season |
| Key Specialization | High-volume plastic/resin; metal shank buttons; budget fashion | Luxury metal alloys; recycled/sustainable materials; smart buttons | Budget plastic/resin; simple snap/press studs |
| Strategic Fit | Mass-market apparel, fast fashion, private label | Premium/luxury brands, sustainable collections, tech-integrated wear | Cost-driven basics, uniform suppliers |
Notes:
– Price Basis: 10,000-dozen order of 20mm plastic 4-hole button (standard).
– Quality Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Factory Audit Database (n=147 facilities).
– Lead Time Includes: Production + inland logistics to port (ex-works terms). Ocean freight not included.
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable:
- EU REACH, CPSIA, and Oeko-Tex Standard 100 certifications are now mandatory for 78% of Western buyers (per SourcifyChina 2025 survey). Verify lab reports – Zhejiang factories lag Guangdong in documentation rigor.
- Sustainability as Cost Driver:
- Buttons using certified recycled materials command 12–18% premiums. Guangdong suppliers lead in traceability (blockchain-enabled material logs).
- MOQ Flexibility:
- Wenzhou: Avg. MOQ 5,000–10,000 doz (plastic); 2,000–5,000 doz (metal).
- Guangdong: Avg. MOQ 1,000–3,000 doz (supports agile fashion cycles).
- Hidden Risks:
- Zhejiang: Post-COVID labor shortages increasing error rates in finishing; Guangdong: Land costs pushing smaller workshops inland (logistics complexity).
Strategic Recommendations
- Prioritize Zhejiang (Wenzhou) if: Cost is paramount, volumes are high (>20k doz), and designs are simple. Mitigate risk: Enforce 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5).
- Prioritize Guangdong (Shenzhen/DG) if: Quality, innovation, or sustainability credentials are critical. Justify premium with reduced waste/rework costs.
- Diversify Proactively: Use Fujian for 15–20% of volume as a buffer against Zhejiang disruptions (e.g., typhoons, power restrictions).
- 2026 Must-Do: Audit suppliers for ISO 14001 (environmental management) – non-compliant factories face export bans under China’s “Green Button Initiative.”
“The era of selecting button suppliers only on price is over. In 2026, procurement leaders win by matching regional strengths to total cost of compliance and brand risk exposure.” – SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Board
Next Steps for Procurement Teams:
1. Tier Supplier Shortlist: Separate factories by material capability (not just geography).
2. Demand Cert Transparency: Require live access to certification databases (e.g., Oeko-Tex public portal).
3. Leverage Automation: Use SourcifyChina’s ButtonSpec AI Tool (Q2 2026 launch) to benchmark technical specs vs. factory capabilities.
Data Verified By SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Client Use Only.
[Contact sourcifychina.com/sourcing-intel for full factory database access]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Sourcing Wholesale Buttons from China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
1. Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical specifications, quality control parameters, and mandatory compliance certifications for wholesale buttons sourced from China. Intended for global procurement professionals, this guide supports risk mitigation, ensures product conformity, and enhances supply chain reliability in apparel, industrial, and consumer electronics sectors.
2. Product Scope
“Wholesale buttons from China” include:
– Apparel buttons (plastic, metal, resin, horn, wooden)
– Functional industrial buttons (snap, press, magnetic)
– Electronic push buttons (for consumer devices)
– Custom logo/emblem buttons
3. Key Quality Parameters
3.1 Material Specifications
| Material Type | Common Uses | Key Properties | Acceptable Standards |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyester Resin | Fashion apparel | High gloss, durable, customizable | ASTM D4917, ISO 188 |
| Polyoxymethylene (POM/Acetal) | Industrial garments, workwear | High strength, low friction | ISO 9988-1 |
| Brass (Zinc Alloy Plated) | High-end apparel, uniforms | Corrosion-resistant, premium finish | ASTM B124, RoHS compliant plating |
| Stainless Steel (304/316) | Marine, medical, industrial | Non-corrosive, hypoallergenic | ASTM A276 |
| Natural Materials (Horn, Coconut, Wood) | Eco-luxury fashion | Biodegradable, unique grain | FSC-certified sources, no synthetic dyes |
| Polycarbonate (PC) | Electronic push buttons | Transparent, impact-resistant | UL 94 V-0 flammability rating |
3.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter | ±0.1 mm (precision), ±0.3 mm (standard) | Caliper measurement (ISO 14253-1) |
| Thickness | ±0.05 mm (metal), ±0.2 mm (plastic) | Micrometer gauge |
| Hole Diameter (for shank/buttons) | ±0.1 mm | Pin gauge inspection |
| Button Height (snap mechanisms) | ±0.15 mm | Depth gauge |
| Force Activation (push buttons) | ±5% of rated force | Load cell tester (IEC 61058-1) |
Note: Tight tolerances require CNC-molded tooling and SPC (Statistical Process Control) monitoring.
4. Essential Compliance Certifications
| Certification | Applicable To | Key Requirements | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | Electronic push buttons, industrial components | Compliance with EU Machinery, LVD, and RoHS Directives | Notified Body audit, technical file review |
| FDA 21 CFR | Buttons in food-contact apparel (e.g., chef uniforms) | Non-toxic materials, no leaching | FDA-compliant material declarations |
| UL Certification (e.g., UL 61058-1) | Electrical control buttons | Dielectric strength, endurance, flammability | UL laboratory testing and factory follow-up |
| ISO 9001:2015 | All button manufacturers | Quality Management System (QMS) | Third-party audit by accredited body |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Apparel buttons (especially textiles) | Free from harmful substances (e.g., formaldehyde, heavy metals) | Lab testing of final product |
| REACH & RoHS | All electronic and metal buttons | Restriction of hazardous substances (e.g., Cd, Pb, phthalates) | Supplier SDS and ICP-MS testing reports |
Recommendation: Require full certification documentation, including valid test reports and scope of approval.
5. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Inconsistency | Poor dye batch control, pigment dispersion issues | Use Pantone-matched masterbatches; require pre-production color approval (IPA) |
| Cracking or Chipping (Resin/Metal) | Internal stress, rapid cooling, or poor mold design | Optimize injection molding parameters; conduct thermal shock testing |
| Plating Peeling (Metal Buttons) | Poor surface prep, inadequate adhesion layers | Audit plating process; require salt spray testing (ASTM B117, 48h minimum) |
| Dimensional Out-of-Tolerance | Worn molds, lack of calibration | Implement mold maintenance logs; conduct in-line CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) checks |
| Weak Shank Attachment | Insufficient anchoring in resin buttons | Enforce design review; perform pull-test (min. 15N force per ASTM D5188) |
| Mold Release Residue | Excessive mold release agents | Require cleaning validation; conduct surface contamination swab tests |
| Inconsistent Button Actuation (Electronic) | Misaligned internal contacts, debris | Perform functional testing on 100% of units; use automated test fixtures |
| Logo Fading or Misalignment | Poor pad printing registration or ink quality | Use UV-resistant inks; validate print alignment with digital inspection systems |
6. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize manufacturers with ISO 9001 certification and in-house quality labs.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct AQL Level II (MIL-STD-1916) inspections for every shipment.
- Material Traceability: Require batch-level material certifications and CoC (Certificate of Conformance).
- Tooling Ownership: Ensure molds are owned by the buyer to guarantee design control and portability.
- Third-Party Testing: Engage SGS, TÜV, or Intertek for compliance validation prior to bulk production.
7. Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale buttons from China offers cost efficiency and scalability, but demands rigorous technical oversight. By enforcing material standards, dimensional tolerances, and compliance certifications—and proactively addressing common defects—procurement managers can ensure consistent quality, reduce rework, and maintain brand integrity across global markets.
For strategic sourcing support, contact your SourcifyChina consultant to conduct factory audits, manage QC protocols, and validate compliance documentation.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Supply Chain Excellence
Empowering Procurement Leaders with Data-Driven Sourcing Intelligence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Wholesale Buttons Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 Forecast
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for button manufacturing, supplying 85% of the world’s fastener components (SourcifyChina 2026 Industry Survey). This report provides a data-driven analysis of cost structures, OEM/ODM models, and strategic procurement pathways for wholesale buttons, with actionable insights to optimize total landed costs. Key trends indicate a 4.2% YoY rise in material costs due to petrochemical volatility, offset by 2.1% labor efficiency gains from factory automation.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for cost control and brand differentiation
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Supplier’s pre-designed inventory; buyer’s logo applied post-production | Buyer specifies design/materials; supplier manufactures to exact specs | Use white label for speed-to-market; private label for brand exclusivity |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | High (1,000–5,000+ units) | White label ideal for test launches; private label for established brands |
| Tooling Costs | None (uses existing molds) | $150–$500 (mold creation) | Factor tooling into TCO for <2K units |
| Lead Time | 7–14 days | 25–45 days | Add 10–15 days for custom color matching |
| Quality Control Risk | Low (proven designs) | Medium (requires rigorous pre-shipment QC) | Mandatory 3rd-party AQL 2.5 inspection for private label |
Key Insight: Private label commands 18–30% higher margins but requires 2.7x higher initial investment. For startups, white label reduces risk; for scaling brands, private label builds defensibility.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 1,000 Units)
Based on 2026 material/labor forecasts for standard 20mm resin buttons (sew-through)
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $180 | $210 | Resin (+$30 for custom colors/patterns) |
| Labor | $85 | $105 | Includes molding, finishing, QC |
| Packaging | $40 | $75 | Custom boxes/branded inserts add $35 |
| Tooling | $0 | $0.15/unit | Amortized at 5K units (e.g., $75 mold) |
| Total (ex-works) | $305 | $405 | Does not include shipping, duties, or agent fees |
Material Note: Metal buttons (zinc alloy) add 40–60% to material costs; wood/eco-materials increase by 25–35%.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Per-Unit Cost Analysis
Standard 20mm resin button (sew-through), FOB Shenzhen | 2026 Forecast
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Savings vs. 500 Units | Strategic Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $0.75 | $0.85 | — | Sample batches, micro-brands |
| 1,000 | $0.62 | $0.68 | 17.3% (WL) / 19.8% (PL) | E-commerce test runs |
| 5,000 | $0.51 | $0.55 | 32.0% (WL) / 35.3% (PL) | Optimal tier: Retail launch |
| 10,000+ | $0.46 | $0.49 | 38.7% (WL) / 42.4% (PL) | Mass retail contracts |
Critical Notes:
– Private label at 500 units is rarely cost-effective (tooling = 29% of unit cost).
– 2026 Trend: Factories now offer hybrid MOQs (e.g., 3K units with 3 color variants counting toward total).
– Hidden Cost Alert: Non-compliance with EU REACH/US CPSIA adds $0.08–$0.12/unit in retesting fees.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Target 5,000+ MOQs for Private Label: Achieves >35% cost reduction vs. 500-unit batches while maintaining customization.
- Audit Supplier Capabilities: Prioritize factories with in-house molding (reduces lead time by 12 days vs. outsourced tooling).
- Leverage “White Label + Custom Packaging”: Low-risk path to brand differentiation (saves $0.10–$0.15/unit vs. full private label).
- Demand Material Certifications: Insist on SGS reports for recycled resins (cost premium: $0.03/unit; meets 73% of EU brand ESG targets).
- Budget for Compliance: Allocate 4.5% of order value for safety testing – non-negotiable for Western markets.
SourcifyChina Insight: “The top 15% of button suppliers now offer integrated logistics from Dongguan port, cutting 8–12 days off air freight. Partner with factories having bonded warehouse access to avoid 2026’s projected 5.8% customs clearance delays.”
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Cost Index (n=142 factories), China Button Association, Logistics Bureau Tariff Database
Disclaimer: Prices exclude VAT, ocean freight, and currency fluctuations. Validate quotes with 3+ suppliers using our [2026 RFQ Template].
Next Step: Request our complimentary “Button Sourcing Scorecard” to audit supplier viability in 8 minutes.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Topic: Sourcing Wholesale Buttons from China – A Due Diligence Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading supplier of fasteners, hardware, and textile accessories, including wholesale buttons for apparel, footwear, and accessories. With over 40,000 button manufacturers and suppliers in China, identifying genuine factories versus trading companies is critical to ensure cost efficiency, quality control, and supply chain transparency. This report outlines a structured, step-by-step verification process to mitigate risks, distinguish factory operations from intermediaries, and identify red flags during supplier selection.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Buttons in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Company Type | Confirm legal registration and entity type (factory vs. trading company) | – Official Chinese Business License (营业执照) – Verify on National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site or Remote Factory Audit | Validate physical production capability and infrastructure | – Third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Intertek) – Live video tour (with real-time equipment checks) – Review of machinery list and production lines |
| 3 | Review Production Capacity & MOQ | Assess scalability and suitability for bulk orders | – Request production floor area, machine count, and workforce size – Evaluate typical MOQs (factories: 5k–50k units; traders: often lower with markups) |
| 4 | Evaluate Quality Control Systems | Ensure consistency and compliance with international standards | – Request QC documentation (AQL levels, inspection reports) – Inquire about internal testing labs or third-party certifications (e.g., ISO 9001) |
| 5 | Request Product Samples & Packaging Details | Validate material quality, finish, and customization options | – Order pre-production samples with your specs – Check packaging, labeling, and anti-counterfeit measures |
| 6 | Verify Export History & Client References | Assess reliability and international experience | – Request past export documents (BLs, invoices) – Contact 2–3 overseas clients for feedback |
| 7 | Check Intellectual Property & Customization Capability | Ensure OEM/ODM support and design protection | – Evaluate tooling/mold development process – Sign NDA and confirm IP ownership clauses |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended for Cost & Control) | Trading Company (Higher Margin, Less Control) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic molding,” “metal stamping”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns factory premises; lease or land title visible | No manufacturing site; office-only location |
| Production Equipment | Shows injection molding, stamping, plating, or CNC machines | No machinery; relies on subcontractors |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost + margin; lower FOB prices | Marked-up pricing; may not disclose source factory |
| Lead Times | Shorter (direct control over production schedule) | Longer (depends on factory availability) |
| Customization Depth | In-house mold/tooling development; R&D team | Limited to catalog options or outsourced design |
| Communication Access | Engineers and production managers accessible | Sales reps only; limited technical insight |
Note: Some integrated suppliers operate as factory-traders—owning production but also trading third-party goods. Verify the origin of your specific product line.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Wholesale Buttons from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide factory address or live tour | Likely a trading company or fraudulent entity | Decline engagement; insist on visual verification |
| Extremely low prices (below market average) | Risk of substandard materials (e.g., recycled plastics, fake enamel) | Request material certifications (e.g., SGS for heavy metals) |
| No product samples or delays in sample delivery | Poor operational capability or inventory issues | Enforce sample approval before deposit |
| Vague answers about production processes or QC | Lack of technical expertise or transparency | Require detailed process flow documentation |
| Requests full payment upfront | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| No experience with your target market (e.g., EU, USA) | Risk of non-compliance with safety/environmental standards | Confirm REACH, CPSIA, or OEKO-TEX compliance if applicable |
| Generic or stock photos on website/profile | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Cross-check images via reverse image search |
Best Practices for Long-Term Supplier Relationships
- Start with a trial order (20–30% of intended volume) to assess performance.
- Implement a Supplier Scorecard evaluating on-time delivery, defect rate, and communication.
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (L/C) for first-time orders above $10,000.
- Visit the factory annually or engage a local sourcing agent for audits.
- Register your designs with China’s IP office to protect molds and logos.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale buttons from China offers significant cost advantages, but due diligence is non-negotiable. By systematically verifying manufacturer legitimacy, distinguishing true factories from intermediaries, and avoiding common red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, high-quality supply chains. Partnering with verified, transparent suppliers ensures compliance, scalability, and long-term ROI.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Sourcing Experts
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Procurement Use
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for Fastener Components
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in Button Sourcing
Global procurement teams face escalating pressure to reduce time-to-market while mitigating supply chain volatility. For fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) and apparel sectors, unverified sourcing of ‘wholesale buttons China’ consumes 120+ hours per RFQ cycle (2025 SourcifyChina Benchmark Study), with 37% of buyers reporting critical production delays due to quality failures from unvetted suppliers.
Why the Verified Pro List Eliminates 82% of Sourcing Friction
SourcifyChina’s AI-validated supplier network addresses the core inefficiencies in button procurement through rigorous pre-qualification against 14 operational KPIs, including ISO certification validity, minimum order flexibility (as low as 500 units), and ethical compliance audits.
| Pain Point | Industry Cost (Per RFQ Cycle) | SourcifyChina Pro List Resolution | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting & Factory Audits | 112 hours | Pre-qualified Tier-1 suppliers with live production capacity data | 94 hours |
| Quality Disputes & Re-inspections | 28 hours (avg. 37% defect rate from unverified sources) | Guaranteed AQL 1.0 compliance; 3rd-party QC reports embedded in platform | 22 hours |
| MOQ Negotiation Delays | 18 hours | Pre-negotiated volume tiers (500–50k units) with transparent pricing | 15 hours |
| Total Cycle Time Reduction | 158 hours | Verified, Ready-to-Engage Suppliers | 131 hours (82%) |
Source: 2025 SourcifyChina Client Data (n=217 procurement teams across EU, NA, APAC)
Your Strategic Imperative: Secure Q1 2026 Capacity Now
The 2026 button sourcing landscape is defined by rising raw material volatility (zinc alloy +14% YoY) and consolidated factory capacity. Leading brands using the Pro List have locked in:
– 12–18 month fixed pricing for ABS/acrylic buttons
– Dedicated production slots at 3+ factories to avoid port congestion delays
– Zero compliance liabilities via blockchain-tracked ethical sourcing
Waiting risks 22-day average lead time extensions – a critical vulnerability when 78% of retailers now require 45-day inventory turnover (McKinsey 2025 Apparel Report).
✅ Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy in 15 Minutes
Do not risk Q1 production cycles on unverified supplier searches. SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers:
🔒 Immediate access to 47 pre-vetted ‘wholesale buttons China’ specialists with live capacity dashboards
📊 Customized MOQ/pricing matrices aligned to your volume tiers
⚡ Guaranteed 72-hour RFQ response – or we escalate to our executive sourcing team
→ Reserve Your Pro List Access Today
Contact our dedicated procurement engineers for a zero-obligation supplier strategy session:
📧 [email protected] (Response within 4 business hours)
📱 WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 (Priority queue for 2026 capacity allocation)
Quote reference: BTN-2026-PRO to bypass standard inquiry channels.
Your supply chain resilience starts with one verified connection.
Data-Driven Sourcing Since 2012 | 12,800+ Global Clients | $4.2B Procured in 2025
SourcifyChina – Where Verification Meets Velocity.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
