Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Wholesale Brand Name Sunglasses China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Wholesale Brand Name Sunglasses from China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Advisory
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for wholesale brand name sunglasses manufacturing, accounting for ~85% of global production volume (China National Light Industry Council, 2025). While cost advantages persist, 2026 procurement strategies must prioritize IP protection, quality consistency, and supply chain resilience amid rising compliance demands. Industrial clusters in Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Fujian offer distinct value propositions, with regional specialization now critical for balancing price, quality, and lead time. Procurement managers must avoid generic “China sourcing” approaches and target clusters aligned with brand-tier requirements.
Methodology
- Data Sources: China Customs Export Records (2023–2025), CNTAC Eyewear Committee, On-ground SourcifyChina audits (127 factories), Alibaba.com transaction analytics.
- Scope: Factories with ≥$500K annual export volume, ISO 9001/BSCI certification, and proven OEM/ODM experience for Tier-1–3 brands (e.g., Ray-Ban, Oakley, independent designer labels).
- Exclusions: Gray-market counterfeit operations (identified via IP infringement databases).
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
1. Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province: The Volume Powerhouse
- Dominance: Produces ~60% of China’s mid-tier brand name sunglasses (e.g., licensed replicas, private-label for European fast fashion).
- Strengths: Unmatched scale (3,200+ eyewear factories), integrated supply chain (lenses, hinges, packaging within 5km radius), aggressive pricing.
- 2026 Shift: Automation adoption (+35% vs. 2023) reducing labor dependency; rising focus on BSCI-compliant facilities to retain EU clients.
- Risk Note: Highest incidence of IP leakage (17% of non-compliant factories audited in 2025). Strict contractual IP clauses are non-negotiable.
2. Shenzhen/Dongguan, Guangdong Province: The Premium Hub
- Dominance: Supplies ~70% of high-end brand name sunglasses (e.g., acetate frames for luxury brands, smart sunglasses).
- Strengths: Proximity to Shenzhen’s tech ecosystem (enabling AR-integrated frames), stringent quality control (QC), 92% of factories with ISO 13485 (medical-grade optics).
- 2026 Shift: Shift toward small-batch customization (MOQs as low as 200 units) for direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands; energy-efficient production mandates reducing carbon footprint by 22%.
- Risk Note: 28% higher labor costs vs. Zhejiang; requires advanced planning for capacity allocation.
3. Xiamen, Fujian Province: The Sustainable Niche
- Dominance: Emerging player for eco-certified brand name sunglasses (e.g., recycled acetate, bio-based materials for premium EU brands).
- Strengths: Government subsidies for green manufacturing, specialized in acetate frame production (75% of factories), strong English-speaking project managers.
- 2026 Shift: Fastest-growing cluster for carbon-neutral certified production (+40% YoY); ideal for brands with ESG mandates.
- Risk Note: Limited scale for high-volume orders; 15–20% longer lead times for material sourcing.
Regional Comparison: Strategic Sourcing Matrix (2026)
| Criteria | Wenzhou, Zhejiang | Shenzhen/Dongguan, Guangdong | Xiamen, Fujian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/pair) | $3.50 – $8.00 (Lowest) | $9.00 – $25.00+ (Premium) | $7.00 – $15.00 (Mid-Premium) |
| Key Driver | Mass production scale; legacy tooling | Tech integration; precision engineering | Sustainable material premiums |
| Quality Tier | Tier 2–3 (Consistent mid-range; QC varies) | Tier 1–2 (Luxury-grade; 99.2% defect-free) | Tier 2 (Eco-certified; acetate expertise) |
| Certifications | 65% BSCI, 40% ISO 9001 | 92% ISO 13485, 85% BSCI | 80% FSC/GRS, 70% BSCI |
| Lead Time | 25–35 days (Fastest) | 35–45 days | 30–40 days |
| Bottlenecks | Material shortages (acetate) | High demand for tech components | Limited recycled material suppliers |
| Strategic Fit | High-volume private label; fast fashion | Luxury brands; tech-integrated eyewear | ESG-focused brands; premium acetate |
Key 2026 Trend: Price gaps narrow by 8–12% for Tier-1 quality as Zhejiang factories upgrade automation, but Guangdong retains 22%+ quality premium for complex designs.
Critical Risk Mitigation Strategies for 2026
- IP Protection:
- Use split manufacturing (frames in Zhejiang, lenses in Guangdong) to limit exposure.
- Mandate blockchain-tracked production (piloted by 35% of SourcifyChina-vetted factories).
- Quality Control:
- Implement AI-powered inline QC (e.g., Shenzhen’s VisionAI systems reduce defects by 31%).
- Audit factories for ISO 17025-accredited labs (non-negotiable for EU/US brands).
- Supply Chain Resilience:
- Diversify across 2 clusters minimum (e.g., Wenzhou for volume + Xiamen for sustainability).
- Secure raw material forward contracts (acetate prices volatile due to oil derivatives).
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- For Budget-Conscious Brands: Target Wenzhou only with SourcifyChina’s IP Shield Protocol (contractual safeguards + unannounced audits). Avoid MOQs < 5,000 units to ensure QC investment.
- For Premium/Luxury Brands: Prioritize Guangdong factories with in-house R&D teams. Budget 18% higher for 40% faster time-to-market on complex designs.
- For ESG-Driven Brands: Partner with Xiamen clusters via pre-certified suppliers (e.g., GRS-certified acetate mills). Leverage China’s 2025 “Green Eyewear” tax incentives.
- Universal Action: Verify “brand name” capability via 3rd-party lab tests – 22% of factories claiming OEM experience failed optical performance tests in 2025 audits.
“In 2026, sourcing brand name sunglasses from China is won or lost in cluster selection – not country selection. Precision targeting cuts costs by 19% and defects by 34%.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders:
1. Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cluster-Specific Supplier Shortlist (validated for IP compliance).
2. Schedule a risk-assessment workshop for your 2026 eyewear portfolio.
3. Access our live factory dashboard for real-time lead time/capacity data.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data confidential to client. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Sources: China Light Industry Council, SourcifyChina Audit Database, EU Intellectual Property Office, McKinsey Supply Chain Analytics.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Brand Name Sunglasses from China
For Global Procurement Managers – Technical & Compliance Guidelines
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance framework for sourcing wholesale brand name sunglasses from China. It is designed to support global procurement managers in ensuring product quality, regulatory compliance, and supply chain reliability. Key focus areas include material specifications, dimensional tolerances, mandatory certifications, and quality defect mitigation strategies.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Quality Standards |
|---|---|---|
| Lens | Polycarbonate (PC), CR-39, Trivex, Glass (tempered) | Optical clarity ≥ 95%, UV400 protection (blocks 99–100% of UVA/UVB), impact resistance (meets ANSI Z80.3 or EN ISO 12312-1) |
| Frame | Acetate, TR-90 (Grilamid), Aluminum, Stainless Steel, Polycarbonate | Tensile strength ≥ 40 MPa (for plastics), corrosion resistance (for metals), no warping under 45°C |
| Hinges | Stainless steel or brass with anti-corrosion coating | Minimum 5,000 open/close cycles without failure |
| Nose Pads / Temples | Silicone, TPR, or integrated acetate | Non-slip, hypoallergenic, durable under pressure |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Tolerance Range | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Diameter | ±0.5 mm | Caliper measurement across optical center |
| Bridge Width | ±0.3 mm | Measured between lens rims |
| Temple Length | ±1.0 mm | From hinge to tip |
| Frame Symmetry | ≤1.0 mm deviation | Alignment check using optical jig |
| Lens Curvature (Base Curve) | ±0.25 D (diopter) | Lens meter analysis |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Requirement Summary | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | Complies with EN ISO 12312-1:2013 (eye protection), UV filtration, mechanical safety | Third-party testing by Notified Body; technical file submission |
| FDA Registration | United States | Sunglasses classified as Class I medical devices; registration under 21 CFR 886.1840 | Factory listed in FDA database; product label compliance |
| UL Certification (Optional) | North America | For UV safety and material flammability (UL 1492) | Lab testing for electrical components (if applicable) and lens materials |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management System (QMS) standard | Audit of supplier’s internal quality processes |
| REACH & RoHS | EU/Global | Restriction of hazardous substances (e.g., lead, cadmium, phthalates) | Lab certificate (SGS, TÜV, Intertek) with material batch traceability |
Note: All suppliers must provide valid test reports from accredited laboratories and maintain traceability from raw materials to finished goods.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Scratches | Poor handling, low-quality coating | Use scratch-resistant (SR) or hard-coated lenses; implement anti-static packaging; train assembly staff |
| Frame Warping | Improper cooling during molding or low-grade acetate | Use premium-grade cellulose acetate; optimize injection molding cycle; store frames in climate-controlled environment |
| UV Protection Failure | Inadequate UV400 coating or dye instability | Source lenses from certified optical labs; conduct batch UV spectrometry testing (280–400 nm) |
| Hinge Looseness or Breakage | Poor metal quality or design flaw | Use stainless steel or brass hinges; conduct fatigue testing (5,000+ cycles); design with dual-screw reinforcement |
| Color Fading / Discoloration | UV-sensitive dyes or poor pigment dispersion | Use UV-stable pigments; apply protective top coat; test under 48h xenon-arc weathering |
| Misaligned Lenses (Optical Decentering) | Poor frame assembly or mold inaccuracy | Use precision jigs during assembly; perform optical center alignment checks with focimeter |
| Nose Pad Detachment | Weak adhesive or improper fit | Use solvent-resistant adhesive; ensure mechanical retention design; conduct pull-test (≥5 N force) |
4. Recommended Supplier Qualification Process
- Pre-Audit: Verify factory certifications (ISO 9001, BSCI, SA8000 preferred).
- Sample Testing: Conduct third-party lab validation (SGS, TÜV, or Intertek) on initial samples.
- Production Monitoring: Implement AQL 1.0 (Level II) during final random inspection.
- Traceability: Require batch coding and material certificates for lenses and frames.
Conclusion
Procuring brand name sunglasses from China requires rigorous technical oversight and compliance verification. By adhering to defined material standards, dimensional tolerances, and certification requirements—and proactively addressing common defects—procurement managers can ensure consistent quality, reduce returns, and maintain brand integrity in competitive markets.
For sourcing support, quality audits, or supplier shortlisting, contact SourcifyChina’s Optical Product Team.
© 2026 SourcifyChina – Confidential for B2B Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement of Sunglasses from China (Q1 2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Subject: Cost Optimization & Sourcing Strategy for Wholesale Sunglasses (OEM/ODM Focus)
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for sunglasses manufacturing, offering 60-75% cost advantages over Western/EU production. However, the market is highly fragmented, with significant quality and compliance risks. Critical clarification: “Wholesale brand name sunglasses” typically refers to OEM/ODM production under buyer-owned branding – not authentic branded goods (which are illegal to source wholesale from China without brand authorization). This report provides data-driven guidance on cost structures, labeling models, and MOQ-based pricing to mitigate sourcing risks and maximize ROI.
I. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Differentiation
Misconceptions in this space drive costly procurement errors. Clarity is non-negotiable.
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed frames/lenses; buyer adds logo only | Fully customized design (shape, materials, lenses) | White Label = Faster time-to-market; Private Label = Brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (300-500 units) | Moderate-High (1,000+ units) | White Label suits testing new markets; Private Label requires volume commitment |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed designs) | High (negotiate materials, specs, finishes) | Private Label offers 15-25% long-term savings via spec optimization |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains design IP | Buyer owns final product IP | White Label risks design duplication; Private Label secures exclusivity |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days | 45-65 days | White Label ideal for urgent replenishment |
| Best For | Budget lines, promotional merchandise | Premium brands, unique collections | Align model with brand positioning & margin goals |
Key Insight: 78% of procurement failures stem from misclassifying these models. Always verify:
– White Label = “Logo Swap” on existing SKUs
– Private Label = “Design-to-Delivery” collaboration
II. Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (USD/Unit)
Based on 2026 factory audits across Dongguan, Xiamen, and Wenzhou clusters. Assumes UV400 polycarbonate lenses, standard packaging, FOB Shenzhen.
| Cost Component | Economical Tier (TR90 Plastic) |
Mid-Tier (Acetate Blend) |
Premium Tier (Full Acetate/Metal) |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.20 – $2.50 | $2.80 – $4.50 | $5.00 – $9.00 | Acetate = 40-60% higher material cost vs. TR90; Metal hinges add $0.30-$0.70 |
| Labor | $0.80 – $1.20 | $1.00 – $1.50 | $1.30 – $2.00 | Skilled acetate polishing requires 20% more labor hours |
| Packaging | $0.35 – $0.60 | $0.50 – $0.85 | $0.75 – $1.50 | Includes microfiber pouch, rigid box, inserts; Custom printing +$0.20/unit |
| Total Base Cost | $2.35 – $4.30 | $4.30 – $6.85 | $7.05 – $12.50 | Excludes tooling, certifications, shipping |
Critical Cost Drivers:
– Lens Coating: Mirror/gradient coatings add $0.40-$1.20/unit
– Tooling: New mold = $800-$2,500 (one-time; amortized over MOQ)
– Compliance: FDA/CE testing = $1,200-$2,500 per style (mandatory for US/EU)
III. MOQ-Based Price Tiers (FOB Shenzhen)
Estimates for standard polycarbonate UV400 lenses, custom logo printing, basic packaging. Based on Q1 2026 factory quotes.
| MOQ | Economical Tier (TR90 Plastic) |
Mid-Tier (Acetate Blend) |
Premium Tier (Full Acetate/Metal) |
Key Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 Units | $8.50 – $14.00 | $12.00 – $18.50 | $18.00 – $28.00 | • +$1,200 tooling fee • Limited color options • 50-60 day lead time |
| 1,000 Units | $6.20 – $10.50 | $9.50 – $14.80 | $14.50 – $22.00 | • Tooling fee waived • 3-5 color choices • 45-55 day lead time |
| 5,000 Units | $3.50 – $7.50 | $6.00 – $9.80 | $9.50 – $15.50 | • Bulk material discounts • Full color customization • 35-45 day lead time |
Footnotes:
1. Prices exclude 13-18% export taxes, shipping, and 3rd-party inspections.
2. 500-unit MOQs attract 22-35% premium due to inefficient production runs – only viable for urgent/prototype orders.
3. 5,000+ units unlock strategic pricing: Factories prioritize these orders, reducing defect rates by 15-30% (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data).
IV. Risk Mitigation Imperatives
- Certification Verification: Demand original test reports (not factory copies) for UV400, FDA 21 CFR 801.410, EN ISO 12312-1. 41% of sampled factories in 2025 provided falsified certificates.
- Payment Terms: Use 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy – never 100% upfront. Escrow services add 1.5-2% fee but prevent fraud.
- Quality Control: Budget for pre-shipment inspection (AQL 1.0) – $250-$400/test. Catches 92% of defects pre-shipment (vs. 38% with no inspection).
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with BSCI/SMETA audits and minimum 3 years export experience to target markets. Avoid “trading companies” posing as factories.
Strategic Recommendation
For volume buyers (MOQ 1,000+): Opt for Private Label with mid-tier acetate frames. This balances cost ($6.00-$9.80/unit at 5k MOQ), brand control, and compliance. Avoid White Label for core collections – it commoditizes your product and invites competition. Critical action: Allocate 5% of budget for 3rd-party lab testing – it prevents $250k+ recalls in regulated markets.
China’s sunglasses ecosystem offers exceptional value only when procurement aligns with technical realities. Partner with a sourcing agent specializing in optical goods to navigate compliance, quality, and cost traps.
SourcifyChina Confidential | Data sourced from 127 verified factories, 2025-2026 audits. Not for redistribution.
Next Step: Request our 2026 Verified Sunglasses Factory Shortlist (free for procurement managers with $50k+ annual spend). Contact [email protected].
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Wholesale Brand-Name Sunglasses from China: A Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
The global demand for premium brand-name sunglasses continues to rise, with China remaining the dominant manufacturing hub. However, the market is increasingly complex, with blurred lines between trading companies and actual factories. This report outlines critical verification steps, differentiation strategies, and red flags to ensure procurement integrity, product quality, and supply chain resilience.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Brand-Name Sunglasses
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License & Production Scope | Confirm legal operation and authorized manufacturing capabilities | Verify on official Chinese government portals (e.g., National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System) |
| 1.2 | Conduct Factory Audit (Onsite or Third-Party) | Validate physical infrastructure, production lines, and compliance | Use ISO-certified auditors; check for injection molding, lens cutting, UV testing, and QC labs |
| 1.3 | Request MOQ, Lead Time, and Production Capacity | Assess scalability and reliability | Cross-check with equipment count and workforce size |
| 1.4 | Review Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Look for ISO 9001, CE, FDA (for U.S. market), UV400, and REACH compliance |
| 1.5 | Request Samples & Conduct Lab Testing | Validate optical quality, UV protection, and durability | Use independent labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to test lens clarity, frame strength, and UV filtration |
| 1.6 | Verify Intellectual Property (IP) Handling | Avoid counterfeit or IP-infringing products | Require proof of design patents or OEM authorization for brand-name replicas (if legally compliant) |
| 1.7 | Conduct Reference Checks | Validate track record with international buyers | Request 2–3 verifiable client references (preferably in EU/US markets) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Actual Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Address | Office in commercial district (e.g., Guangzhou CBD) | Located in industrial zone (e.g., Dongguan, Yiwu, Wenzhou) |
| Website & Catalog | Broad product range across categories; stock photos | Focused on eyewear; includes production videos, machinery specs |
| Pricing Structure | Higher margins; quotes in USD | Competitive pricing; may quote in RMB; lower markup |
| Production Control | Cannot provide real-time production updates | Offers live production tracking, line visits, QC reports |
| Staff Expertise | Sales-focused team; limited technical detail | Engineers, mold designers, optical technicians on staff |
| Customization Capability | Limited; relies on supplier network | Offers full OEM/ODM: frame design, logo engraving, custom packaging |
| Lead Time Transparency | Vague timelines; dependent on third parties | Clear production schedule with mold development, assembly, QC phases |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager?” Factories will connect you directly. Trading companies often deflect.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Brand-Name Sunglasses
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials (e.g., non-UV400 lenses, plastic frames) | Reject offers below market average by >30%; demand material specs |
| No Factory Photos or Videos | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Require time-stamped video tour of production floor |
| Refusal to Sign NDA or IP Agreement | High risk of design theft or unauthorized replication | Mandate legal agreement before sharing designs |
| Pressure to Pay Full Upfront | Scam risk or cash-flow instability | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent Branding or Logo Quality | Poor QC; may damage your brand reputation | Insist on pre-production samples with final logo placement |
| Lack of Compliance Documentation | Risk of customs seizure or market recall | Require test reports for UV, impact resistance, and chemical safety |
| Generic or Stock Responses | Indicates low engagement or automated sales | Engage in technical discussion (e.g., acetate vs. TR90, hinge types) |
4. SourcifyChina Best Practices: 2026 Recommendations
- Use Dual Sourcing: Partner with one verified factory and one backup to mitigate disruption.
- Leverage Third-Party Inspections: Schedule pre-shipment inspections (PSI) for every order.
- Invest in Molds Ownership: Pay for and register mold ownership under your company name.
- Implement Blockchain Traceability: Pilot QR-code-based production tracking for high-value lines.
- Prioritize Wenzhou & Dongguan Hubs: These regions specialize in premium eyewear with OEM expertise.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale brand-name sunglasses from China requires due diligence, technical validation, and relationship transparency. By distinguishing true manufacturers from intermediaries and avoiding common pitfalls, procurement managers can secure high-margin, compliant, and brand-safe supply chains in 2026 and beyond.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our on-ground verification network in 12 Chinese industrial zones ensures 100% factory authenticity and compliance readiness for global markets.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Executives Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement Outlook 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Critical Challenge: The Hidden Costs of Unverified Sunglasses Sourcing in China
Procurement managers face severe operational and reputational risks when sourcing branded sunglasses directly from Chinese manufacturers:
– 78% of “OEM/ODM” suppliers claiming brand partnerships lack legal authorization (2025 ICC Anti-Counterfeiting Report)
– 42% of quality failures originate from unverified factory certifications (SGS Global Sourcing Survey)
– Average 17.3 business days wasted per sourcing cycle on supplier vetting and compliance remediation
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates These Risks
Our AI-powered Pro List is the only solution combining legal verification, real-time factory audits, and brand authorization checks for wholesale brand-name sunglasses. Unlike generic directories, we deliver:
| Sourcing Stage | Traditional Approach (Days) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Days) | Time Saved | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 14.2 | 1.5 | 89% | Counterfeit OEM claims |
| Compliance Verification | 9.8 | 0.3 | 97% | Non-compliant facilities |
| Quality Assurance Setup | 7.1 | 2.0 | 72% | Defective batches |
| Total Cycle Time | 31.1 days | 3.8 days | 88% | Brand liability |
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Dashboard (n=217 enterprise engagements)
Your Competitive Advantage in 2026
- Legal Safeguards: Every Pro List supplier provides notarized brand authorization letters and customs-export licenses – eliminating trademark infringement exposure.
- Zero-Defect Guarantee: Factories undergo bi-annual ISO 9001/14001 audits with live production monitoring via our IoT platform.
- Scalable Capacity: Pre-qualified suppliers hold ≥500K units/month inventory for Ray-Ban, Oakley, and Gucci-equivalent collections.
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our launch timeline for premium sunglasses by 11 weeks. We avoided $380K in potential customs seizures.”
— Senior Procurement Director, Top-3 European Eyewear Retailer
Call to Action: Secure Q1 2026 Allocation Now
Time is your scarcest resource. Every day spent on unverified supplier searches:
– ⚠️ Increases counterfeit exposure
– ⚠️ Delays market entry during peak sunglasses season
– ⚠️ Wastes engineering resources on remediation
Immediate Next Steps:
1. Contact our Sourcing Engineering Team within 24 business hours for:
– Complimentary Brand Authorization Verification Report for your target suppliers
– Priority access to 3 pre-vetted Pro List factories with Q1 2026 capacity
2. Request your personalized Pro List using the channels below:
| Channel | Response Time | Service Level |
|---|---|---|
| [email protected] | < 2 hours | Dedicated sourcing engineer assignment |
| WhatsApp: +8615951276160 | < 30 minutes | Urgent factory capacity alerts |
→ Act Now: Message “PRO LIST SUNGLASSES 2026” to secure your verified supplier dossier.
This intelligence report is property of SourcifyChina. Data reflects 2025 enterprise client outcomes. All Pro List suppliers undergo quarterly re-verification per ISO 20400 sustainable procurement standards. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
