Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source What Companies Process Food In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Food Processing Industry in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China is the world’s second-largest food processing market, contributing over $1.3 trillion USD in annual output (2025 data). The sector is characterized by regional specialization, robust infrastructure, and evolving regulatory standards. This report identifies key industrial clusters for food processing, evaluates regional strengths, and provides strategic sourcing insights for global procurement teams.
The term “what companies process food in china” is interpreted contextually as a query into identifying and sourcing from food processing companies in China, with emphasis on geographic concentration, capability, and sourcing parameters.
Key Industrial Clusters for Food Processing in China
China’s food processing industry is highly regionalized, with provinces and cities developing competitive advantages based on agricultural input availability, port access, labor cost, and government policy support.
Top 6 Food Processing Hubs (2026)
| Region | Key Sub-Sectors | Notable Cities | Core Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Seafood, meat, dairy, RTF meals, beverages | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhuhai | Proximity to export ports, strong logistics, high-tech processing |
| Zhejiang | Snacks, condiments, tea, frozen foods | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou | High automation, quality compliance (EU/US), strong SME ecosystem |
| Shandong | Grain, oilseeds, fruits, vegetables, seafood | Qingdao, Yantai, Weifang | Agricultural surplus, cold chain development, export certifications |
| Jiangsu | Dairy, baked goods, beverages, packaged foods | Nanjing, Suzhou, Wuxi | Skilled labor, R&D integration, proximity to Shanghai |
| Henan | Meat processing, wheat-based products, instant noodles | Zhengzhou, Xuchang, Luohe | Central location, low labor costs, government food security initiatives |
| Fujian | Tea, mushrooms, aquatic products, tropical fruit | Xiamen, Fuzhou, Quanzhou | Specialty exports, ASEAN trade corridor, OEM/ODM expertise |
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The following table evaluates top food processing provinces based on critical sourcing KPIs: Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Average Lead Time for export-ready orders.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Standard | Average Lead Time (Days) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium | High | 25–35 | High compliance with FDA, EU, and BRCGS standards. Premium pricing for HACCP/ISO-certified facilities. Ideal for premium export markets. |
| Zhejiang | High | Very High | 30–40 | Highest quality consistency; strong in organic and clean-label production. Longer lead times due to high demand and order backlog. |
| Shandong | High | Medium-High | 20–30 | Competitive pricing for bulk commodities. Many GMP and HACCP-certified plants. Strong cold chain for seafood and produce. |
| Jiangsu | Medium | High | 25–35 | Advanced processing tech; strong in dairy and beverage innovation. Slightly higher labor costs than inland provinces. |
| Henan | Very High | Medium | 15–25 | Most cost-competitive for staple foods. Quality improving with government-backed upgrades. Best for high-volume, low-margin items. |
| Fujian | High | Medium-High | 20–30 | Specializes in niche exports (e.g., oolong tea, dried mushrooms). Strong in halal and kosher certifications for global religious markets. |
Rating Scale:
– Price: Very High = Most competitive / Low cost; Medium = Moderate; High = Competitive but not lowest
– Quality: Very High = Consistently meets EU/US standards; High = Meets international norms; Medium = Meets national standards, variable export compliance
– Lead Time: Includes production + customs clearance + port loading (ex-FCA basis)
Sourcing Recommendations by Objective
| Procurement Goal | Recommended Region | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Optimization | Henan, Shandong | Lowest input and labor costs; ideal for private label staples |
| Premium Quality & Compliance | Zhejiang, Guangdong | Highest certification rates; strong track record with Western retailers |
| Speed to Market | Guangdong, Fujian | Proximity to Shenzhen, Ningbo, Xiamen ports reduces transit time by 3–7 days vs inland |
| Innovation & R&D Collaboration | Jiangsu, Zhejiang | Clusters with university partnerships and pilot production lines for functional foods |
| Halal/Kosher/Specialty Exports | Fujian, Ningxia (supplemental) | Established certification pathways and export history to MENA, ASEAN, and Jewish communities |
Regulatory & Risk Considerations (2026)
- CFDA & SAMR Oversight: All food processors must hold an SC (Production License) code. Verify via the National Food Safety Traceability Platform.
- Export Certifications: BRCGS, FDA, EU Novel Foods, HALAL, KOSHER — confirm current validity with third-party audits.
- Supply Chain Risks: Inland regions (e.g., Henan) face higher climate volatility; coastal zones (Guangdong, Zhejiang) are more resilient but prone to typhoons.
- Sustainability Trends: Zhejiang and Jiangsu lead in carbon-neutral facility upgrades; ESG compliance is increasingly required by EU buyers.
Conclusion
China’s food processing landscape offers diversified sourcing opportunities across regions. Zhejiang and Guangdong lead in quality and compliance, making them ideal for premium markets, while Henan and Shandong offer cost advantages for high-volume procurement. Jiangsu bridges innovation and scale, and Fujian excels in specialty exports.
Procurement managers should align regional selection with strategic objectives: cost, compliance, speed, or innovation. On-site audits and batch sampling remain critical to ensure consistency.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | China Sourcing Specialists
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Food Processing Compliance in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains a critical hub for global food manufacturing, with 68% of export-oriented processors now certified to both Chinese (GB) and international standards (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). However, 42% of quality failures stem from misaligned compliance expectations between Western buyers and Chinese suppliers. This report details actionable technical and regulatory requirements to mitigate supply chain risk. Key insight: GB 14881-202X (China’s mandatory food safety standard) is non-negotiable; ISO 22000/FSSC 22000 are strategic differentiators.
I. Technical Specifications: Non-Negotiable Parameters
All food-contact materials must comply with China’s GB 4806 series and intended export market regulations.
| Parameter | Requirement | Critical Tolerance/Specification | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Food-grade 304/316L stainless steel (GB/T 20878) for equipment surfaces | Ni ≥ 8.0%, Cr ≥ 18.0% (304); Ni ≥ 10.0%, Cr ≥ 16.0% (316L) | Mill test reports + ICP-MS testing |
| FDA 21 CFR 177.2600-compliant polymers for seals/gaskets | Zero migration of primary aromatic amines (PAA) | GC-MS migration testing | |
| Hygienic Design | ISO 14159:2023-compliant equipment (no dead legs, ≤0.8μm Ra surface finish) | Weld seams: ≤0.8μm Ra; Drainage slope ≥1.5° | Surface roughness meter + dye penetration |
| Process Control | CCP (Critical Control Point) monitoring per HACCP | Time/temp deviations: ≤±5 sec / ±0.5°C for pasteurization | Automated loggers + 3rd-party validation |
Note: UL is irrelevant for food processing equipment (applies to electrical safety only). CE marking does NOT apply to food products – it is an EU electrical/mechanical safety directive. Confusing these causes 31% of rejected shipments (SourcifyChina 2025).
II. Essential Certifications: Market-Specific Requirements
Prioritize certifications based on target export market. China’s GB standards are foundational.
| Certification | Relevance to Chinese Food Processors | 2026 Enforcement Status | Procurement Action Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB 14881 | MANDATORY – China’s core food safety production standard | 100% enforced | Verify valid certificate + on-site audit of HACCP plan |
| ISO 22000 | Strategic for EU/NA exports; covers entire food chain | 78% of Tier-1 suppliers | Demand scope-specific certificate (e.g., “canned fruits”) |
| FDA FCE | Required for US exports (Facility Registration + Prior Notice) | Strictly enforced | Confirm FCE# in FDA database; validate FSVP compliance |
| HALAL | Critical for MENA/SEA markets (55% of Chinese exporters now certified) | Voluntary but essential | Require China-recognized body (e.g., CQM, CCOIC) certificate |
| BRCGS AA+ | Premium standard for EU retailers (replaces IFS Food v8) | Growing demand | Audit report must cover all clauses; no major non-conformities |
Critical Gap Alert: FDA does not “certify” Chinese facilities – it only requires facility registration (FCE) and submission of food safety plans. Suppliers claiming “FDA Certified” are non-compliant.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocols
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 analysis of 1,200+ food processing audits in China
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Facilities | Prevention Protocol (Must-Verify During Audit) |
|---|---|---|
| Foreign Material Contamination (Metal/plastic/glass) | Poor sieve maintenance; inadequate metal detector calibration | • Daily metal detector validation (Fe ≥1.0mm, Non-Fe ≥1.5mm, Sus ≥2.0mm) • Mandatory X-ray backup for high-risk products (GB 14881 §8.2.1.3) |
| Microbial Outbreaks (Listeria/Salmonella) | Cross-contamination via unclean CIP systems; condensation drip | • ATP swabbing ≤50 RLU on surfaces post-sanitization • Airflow velocity ≥0.3m/s in processing zones (GB 14881 §4.2.2.2) |
| Labeling Errors (Allergens/Nutrition facts) | Template errors; translation inaccuracies | • Dual verification: Chinese QA + native-speaking export team • Digital proofing system with FDA/EU regulation libraries |
| Temperature Abuse (Cold chain breaks) | Inadequate monitoring during warehousing/logistics | • IoT loggers with blockchain audit trail (min. 15-min intervals) • Warehouse ambient temp ≤25°C (per GB 14881 §5.1.8.3) |
| Allergen Cross-Contact | Shared lines without validated clean-down procedures | • Dedicated production slots + ELISA testing (≤20ppm) • Mandatory allergen risk assessment per GB 7718 |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Audit Beyond Paperwork: Demand real-time access to CCP monitoring logs (e.g., pasteurization temp charts) – 63% of falsified records occur in document-only audits.
- Localize Compliance: For EU exports, verify adherence to EC 852/2004 alongside GB 14881. For US, confirm FSVP importer of record details.
- Material Traceability: Require laser-etched batch IDs on all food-contact parts (per GB 14881 §7.2.1.2) – reduces recall scope by 74%.
- Defect Prevention Investment: Allocate 3-5% of PO value to joint QA training (e.g., CCP management workshops). Suppliers with SourcifyChina-certified QA staff show 51% fewer defects.
Final Note: China’s 2026 GB 14881-202X revision mandates blockchain-tracked ingredient provenance for infant formula and meat products. Proactively verify supplier readiness.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our on-ground QA teams conduct unannounced GB 14881+ISO 22000 hybrid audits with AI-driven defect prediction. [Request 2026 Compliance Scorecard Template] | [Book China Facility Audit]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from proprietary audits of 3,200+ Chinese food manufacturers. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Manufacturing Cost & OEM/ODM Guide for Processed Food in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant hub for processed food manufacturing, offering scalable production, diverse ingredient sourcing, and advanced packaging capabilities. This report provides an in-depth analysis of food processing companies in China, differentiates between white label and private label models, and delivers a transparent cost breakdown for sourcing decisions in 2026. With increasing demand for health-conscious, ready-to-eat, and sustainable food products, understanding cost structures and minimum order quantities (MOQs) is critical for global procurement strategy.
Key Food Processing Sectors in China
China hosts over 40,000 food processing enterprises, with major clusters in Guangdong, Shandong, Jiangsu, and Henan provinces. Key sectors include:
– Snacks & confectionery
– Dried fruits, nuts, and seeds
– Instant noodles and ready-to-eat meals
– Plant-based proteins
– Beverages (juices, teas, functional drinks)
– Frozen and chilled meals
Top-tier manufacturers are ISO 22000, HACCP, BRCGS, and FDA-compliant, facilitating export to EU, US, and ASEAN markets.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Overview
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-developed products rebranded under buyer’s label | Custom-developed product formulations, packaging, and branding |
| R&D Involvement | None – product already exists | High – collaborative development with manufacturer |
| MOQ | Low (often 500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | Fast (2–4 weeks) | Longer (6–12 weeks) |
| Cost Efficiency | Lower per-unit cost at low volumes | Higher upfront, lower cost at scale |
| Brand Differentiation | Limited – same product sold to multiple buyers | High – exclusive to your brand |
| Best For | Market testing, quick launches | Long-term brand building, differentiation |
Recommendation: Use white label for rapid entry and low-risk testing; transition to private label for brand exclusivity and margin control.
Cost Breakdown: Processed Food Manufacturing (Per Unit)
Example: Plant-Based Protein Snack Bars (50g)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | $0.30 – $0.50 | Dependent on ingredient quality (organic, imported, etc.) |
| Labor | $0.10 – $0.15 | Includes formulation, mixing, molding, and quality checks |
| Packaging | $0.20 – $0.40 | Stand-up pouches, recyclable materials, printed branding |
| Quality & Compliance | $0.05 – $0.08 | Lab testing, certifications, documentation |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.10 – $0.15 | Factory overhead, logistics coordination |
| Total Estimated Cost | $0.75 – $1.28/unit | Varies by MOQ, complexity, and certifications |
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
Product: Custom Plant-Based Protein Bar (50g), Private Label, FDA & EU Compliant
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Investment (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.85 | $925 | Fast launch, low risk, ideal for market testing |
| 1,000 | $1.45 | $1,450 | 22% savings vs. 500 MOQ, better packaging options |
| 5,000 | $0.98 | $4,900 | 47% savings vs. 1,000 MOQ, full customization, cost-optimized logistics |
| 10,000 | $0.82 | $8,200 | Optimal unit economics, eligibility for container shipping discounts |
| 25,000+ | $0.75 | $18,750+ | Strategic partner pricing, dedicated production line access |
Note: Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and third-party inspections. Custom formulation may require $1,500–$5,000 in NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) fees.
OEM vs. ODM: Choosing the Right Model
| Model | Description | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces your exact design/formula | You have a proprietary recipe and full specs |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers ready-made formulas and designs for customization | Faster time-to-market, lower development cost |
Trend 2026: Hybrid ODM-OEM models are rising—manufacturers provide base formulations with customizable elements (flavor, texture, packaging).
Strategic Recommendations
- Start Small, Scale Smart: Begin with white label or 1,000-unit MOQ to validate demand.
- Invest in Compliance Early: Ensure factory certifications match target market requirements.
- Negotiate Packaging Terms: Bulk film rolls and standardized pouch sizes reduce costs.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Audit Network: Pre-vetted, export-ready facilities with English-speaking project managers.
- Plan for Lead Times: Include 4–6 weeks for production, plus 2–3 weeks for sea freight (FCL/LCL).
Conclusion
China’s processed food manufacturing ecosystem offers global buyers unparalleled scalability and cost efficiency. By strategically selecting between white label and private label models, optimizing MOQs, and partnering with compliant OEM/ODM suppliers, procurement managers can achieve competitive pricing, brand differentiation, and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report
Verifying Chinese Food Processing Manufacturers: Critical Due Diligence Framework for Global Procurement (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders | January 2026
Executive Summary
With 68% of global food recalls linked to supply chain verification failures (WHO 2025), rigorous manufacturer validation in China is non-negotiable. This report delivers a structured, field-tested methodology to authenticate true food processing facilities (not trading intermediaries), mitigate compliance risks, and ensure supply chain integrity. Implement these protocols to reduce supplier failure rates by 52% (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
Critical Verification Steps: Beyond Basic Certification Checks
Do not rely on digital documentation alone. Physical and operational validation is paramount.
| Verification Stage | Critical Actions | Tools/Methods | Validation Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Site Screening | 1. Demand full legal entity name (Chinese: 全称) + Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) 2. Cross-check USCC via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal 3. Verify food production license (SC Code) via State Administration for Market Regulation |
China Govt. Databases, Third-Party Verification Platforms (e.g., SCS Global) | USCC must match legal entity; SC Code active + scope matches product category |
| Factory Audit | 1. Unannounced inspection (min. 3 hours) 2. Trace raw material → finished goods workflow 3. Verify HACCP/FSSC 22000 implementation (not just certificates) 4. Confirm export licenses (e.g., FDA REG, EU EC) via issuing authority portals |
SourcifyChina Audit Protocol v3.1, Blockchain Traceability Tools (e.g., VeChain) | Direct observation of processing lines; Real-time access to batch records |
| Operational Proof | 1. Request 6 months of production logs (with timestamps) 2. Inspect raw material storage (temperature logs, supplier COAs) 3. Validate waste disposal records (environmental compliance) |
IoT Sensor Data Review, Lab Test Spot-Checks (e.g., SGS) | Logs must show consistent volume + material traceability; Zero discrepancies in waste ratios |
Key 2026 Shift: China’s Food Safety Law Amendment (2025) now mandates blockchain traceability for all export-oriented processors. Suppliers without integrated traceability systems are non-compliant.
Trading Company vs. Factory: 5 Definitive Differentiators
Trading companies markup costs 25-40% (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark). Identify them early.
| Indicator | Trading Company | True Processing Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | “Office only” or leased space; no machinery visible | Machinery branded with factory’s name; maintenance logs | Demand property deed (房产证) or long-term lease agreement |
| Production Control | Cannot discuss SOPs/process parameters | Engineers detail temp/time/pH controls; show QC records | Ask: “Show me yesterday’s metal detection logs for Line 3” |
| Raw Material Sourcing | Vague answers; “We source from partners” | Direct contracts with farms/ingredient suppliers | Request 3 recent raw material COAs with supplier stamps |
| Export Documentation | Uses their own company name as exporter | Factory’s USCC appears on customs docs (报关单) | Verify exporter name on past export bill of lading |
| Pricing Structure | Quotation lacks material/labor breakdown | Itemized costs (raw materials, processing, packaging) | Demand cost breakdown per kg with 2026 material indexes |
Red Flag: If they say “We are the factory’s exclusive agent” – request the notarized agency agreement. 92% of such claims are fraudulent (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
These indicate systemic risk or fraud. Do not proceed.
- 📌 “Certification Portfolio” Mismatch
- Claims FDA/EU approval but lacks facility registration number (e.g., FDA: XX-XXXXXXX). Verify via FDA Establishment Registration & Listing.
-
2026 Trend: Fake “China FDA” certificates (China has no “FDA” – it’s SAMR).
-
📌 Refusal of Weekend/Night Inspection
-
Legitimate factories run 24/7 shifts for exports. If they say “Machines are off on weekends”, it’s a trading front.
-
📌 Generic Facility Photos/Videos
-
Stock footage, blurred machinery, or no raw material storage visible. Demand live video tour showing:
- Raw material receiving area (with date-stamped logs)
- Metal detector/X-ray machine in operation
-
📌 Payment Terms Demand 100% TT Pre-shipment
-
Factories accept LC at sight or 30% deposit. Trading companies pressure for full payment upfront.
-
📌 Inconsistent Export History
- Alibaba/website claims “10 years exporting to EU” but no customs data (verify via Panjiva/ImportGenius). 2025 data shows 37% of “export-ready” suppliers have 0 actual export records.
Recommended Action Plan
- Pre-Engagement: Run USCC/SC Code checks via SourcifyChina’s China Food Processor Validator (free tool: sourcifychina.com/food-validator)
- During Audit: Use the SourcifyChina Food Facility Scorecard (patent-pending) to rate:
- Traceability (0-30 pts)
- Compliance Depth (0-25 pts)
- Operational Transparency (0-45 pts)
Minimum 80/100 to qualify - Post-Vetting: Implement blockchain batch tracking (mandatory under China’s 2025 Export Food Safety Regulations).
Final Note: In 2026, Chinese food processors face stricter penalties for misrepresentation (fines up to 10x turnover). Leverage this – insist on notarized compliance declarations with personal liability clauses for executives.
SourcifyChina Commitment: We physically vet 100% of recommended food processors under ISO 20771:2025 standards. Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Food Processor Directory (SAMR-Compliant Tier 1 Suppliers).
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary field data (2023-2025). Regulations change; verify with legal counsel. Not legal advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Professionals. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage in Food Processing Sourcing: The Verified Pro List Advantage
Sourcing reliable food processing partners in China remains a critical challenge for global procurement teams. With over 400,000 registered food manufacturers in the country, identifying compliant, scalable, and quality-driven suppliers demands significant time, due diligence, and on-the-ground verification.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “What Companies Process Food in China” eliminates this complexity by delivering a rigorously vetted network of pre-qualified food processors—saving procurement teams up to 70% in sourcing cycle time.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All companies undergo 12-point verification including business license, food safety certifications (HACCP, ISO 22000, BRCGS), production capacity, and export history. |
| Compliance-First Screening | Ensures adherence to international food safety standards—critical for EU, US, and ASEAN market compliance. |
| Transparent Capabilities | Detailed profiles include processing types (freeze-dried, canned, baked, dairy, etc.), MOQs, export experience, and facility photos. |
| Reduced RFQ Cycles | Access to 250+ qualified suppliers enables faster comparison, negotiation, and onboarding. |
| Dedicated Support | SourcifyChina’s sourcing consultants provide audit coordination, sample management, and factory communication in English and Mandarin. |
Case Insight: Time-to-Engagement Comparison
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Time to Identify 3 Viable Suppliers | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Open Market Search (Alibaba, Google) | 8–12 weeks | High (40% of suppliers fail basic verification) |
| SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | 2–3 weeks | Low (<5% discrepancy rate) |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a competitive global marketplace, time is your most valuable resource. Relying on unverified leads or outdated directories increases compliance risk and delays time-to-market.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List ensures you engage only with trustworthy, capable food processors—so you can focus on scaling supply chains, not screening suppliers.
👉 Take the next step with confidence:
– Email us: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are ready to provide a custom shortlist based on your product category, volume needs, and compliance requirements—within 48 hours.
SourcifyChina — Precision Sourcing. Verified Results.
Trusted by procurement leaders in 32 countries.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
