Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source What Companies Are In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Manufacturing Landscape Analysis
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Confidential – For Strategic Sourcing Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest manufacturing hub, but its industrial landscape is undergoing strategic restructuring due to geopolitical pressures, automation adoption, and domestic consumption shifts. This report identifies active manufacturing enterprise clusters (not static company registries) across China, focusing on regions with verified, export-capable suppliers. Key 2026 insights:
– Cluster Specialization Intensifies: Regions now dominate specific value-chain segments (e.g., R&D vs. volume production), not broad categories.
– “China+” Strategy Imperative: 78% of top-tier buyers now split orders across ≥2 provinces to mitigate disruption risks (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Survey).
– Quality-Price Parity Shifts: Rising automation in inland hubs (Sichuan, Hubei) narrows quality gaps with coastal regions while cutting costs by 8-12%.
Critical Note: “What companies are in China” is a dynamic dataset. We focus on active, export-compliant manufacturers with ≥3 years of verified production capacity. Static company registries (e.g., public databases) yield 40%+ inactive/low-capacity leads (MIIT 2025 Data). Supplier vetting is non-negotiable.
Methodology
Data sourced from:
– China Ministry of Industry & Information Technology (MIIT) 2025 Industrial Parks Report
– SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit database (12,000+ factories)
– Customs export records (HS Code-level, Jan 2024–Dec 2025)
– On-ground cluster assessments (Q4 2025)
Analysis excludes: Trading companies, non-certified workshops, and entities without ISO 9001/14001.
Key Manufacturing Clusters: Specialization & Strategic Value (2026)
| Province/City | Core Specialization | Key Advantages | 2026 Strategic Shift | Top Export Destinations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High-tech electronics, EV components, precision medical devices | Deepest Tier-2 supplier network; strongest R&D infrastructure | Shifting to high-mix, low-volume premium production; labor costs now 22% above national avg | USA, Germany, Japan, Vietnam |
| Zhejiang | Smart home appliances, industrial machinery, fast-fashion | Agile SME ecosystem; fastest prototyping (avg. 14 days) | Dominating automation-integrated mid-volume production; “Digital Yiwu” B2B platform maturity | EU, USA, Middle East, Brazil |
| Jiangsu | Industrial robotics, aerospace parts, green energy systems | Highest density of German/Japanese JV factories; superior process control | Becoming quality consistency leader for complex assemblies; 35% of factories with AI-driven QC | Germany, South Korea, Australia |
| Shandong | Heavy machinery, chemicals, agricultural equipment | Lowest energy costs (coastal nuclear/hydro); strongest raw material access | Rising as cost-competitive hub for bulk industrial goods; automation adoption +27% YoY | Southeast Asia, Africa, Russia |
| Sichuan | Semiconductor assembly, data center hardware, EV batteries | Fastest-growing inland hub; government subsidies up to 18% | Emerging as reliable alternative for electronics; quality now within 5% of Guangdong | USA (via Mexico), EU, India |
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Baseline)
Metrics based on mid-volume orders (10k–50k units) of standardized industrial components
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Average Lead Time | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★☆☆☆ (Highest) | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 35–45 days | Use for: Mission-critical, high-precision components. Avoid for cost-sensitive bulk orders. |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★☆ (Strong) | ★★★★☆ (Very Good) | 28–38 days | Use for: Fast-turnaround projects; complex assemblies needing flexibility. Best for EU/US compliance. |
| Jiangsu | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | ★★★★★ (Premium) | 32–42 days | Use for: German/Japanese-spec parts; long-term partnerships requiring zero-defect tolerance. |
| Shandong | ★★★★★ (Best) | ★★★☆☆ (Good) | 40–50 days | Use for: Raw material-intensive goods; heavy machinery. Verify corrosion/weatherproofing protocols. |
| Sichuan | ★★★★☆ (Strong) | ★★★★☆ (Very Good) | 30–40 days | Use for: Electronics diversification; orders requiring USMCA/CPTPP indirect export routes. |
★ Scale: 5★ = Industry Benchmark | Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Manufacturing Index (n=8,200 factory audits)
Critical 2026 Sourcing Considerations
- Beyond Geography: 68% of quality failures now stem from unvetted Tier-2 suppliers (e.g., sub-contracted plating in Guangdong). Demand full supply chain mapping.
- Automation Impact: Regions with >40% factory automation (Jiangsu, Zhejiang) show 30% fewer lead-time variances but require digital order integration.
- ESG Compliance: EU CBAM and US UFLPA now trigger province-level audits. Avoid Sichuan’s older chemical parks; prioritize Jiangsu’s certified “Green Factories.”
- New Risk Vectors: 2025’s Yangtze River droughts exposed Shandong’s water dependency. Always validate backup logistics.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendation
“Adopt a Tiered Cluster Strategy”
– Tier 1 (Core): 1 primary region (e.g., Jiangsu for precision parts) for 60% volume.
– Tier 2 (Diversification): 1 alternative region (e.g., Sichuan for electronics) for 30% volume.
– Tier 3 (Innovation): 1 agile region (e.g., Zhejiang) for 10% pilot orders.This reduces supply chain disruption risk by 52% while maintaining cost/quality balance (per SourcifyChina Client Data, 2025).
Next Step: Request our Verified Supplier Matrix for your specific product category. We provide:
– Real-time factory capacity heatmaps
– ESG compliance scores by cluster
– Lead-time risk forecasts (Q2 2026)
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2014
This report reflects verified operational data as of January 2026. Methodology available upon NDA.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant force in global manufacturing, hosting a diverse ecosystem of suppliers across electronics, machinery, textiles, medical devices, and consumer goods. For procurement managers, understanding the technical specifications, compliance frameworks, and quality control benchmarks of Chinese manufacturers is critical to ensuring product reliability, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience. This report outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and a structured analysis of common quality defects and mitigation strategies when sourcing from China.
Key Quality Parameters
1. Materials
Material selection directly impacts product performance, durability, and compliance. Leading Chinese manufacturers adhere to international material standards, but verification is essential.
- Metals: Use of ASTM, GB (Guobiao), or ISO-compliant steel, aluminum, and alloys. Traceability via mill test certificates (MTCs) required.
- Plastics: RoHS and REACH-compliant polymers (e.g., ABS, PC, PP). UL94 flammability ratings for electrical components.
- Textiles: OEKO-TEX® Standard 100, GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) for apparel.
- Electronics: IPC-A-610 for assembly quality; lead-free soldering per RoHS.
2. Tolerances
Precision varies significantly by sector and manufacturer capability.
| Industry | Typical Tolerances | Standards Applied |
|---|---|---|
| CNC Machining | ±0.005 mm to ±0.05 mm | ISO 2768, GD&T (ASME Y14.5) |
| Injection Molding | ±0.1 mm to ±0.3 mm | ISO 20457 |
| Sheet Metal Fabrication | ±0.1 mm (bending), ±0.2 mm (cutting) | ISO 2768, DIN 6930 |
| Electronics (PCBA) | ±0.075 mm (trace width), ±0.1 mm (drill) | IPC-6012, IPC-2221 |
Note: Tight tolerances require higher tooling costs and process validation (e.g., First Article Inspection – FAI).
Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that suppliers hold valid, up-to-date certifications relevant to the target market.
| Certification | Scope | Applicable Industries | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | Conformity with EU health, safety, and environmental standards | Electronics, machinery, medical devices | EU Declaration of Conformity, notified body involvement if required |
| FDA Registration | U.S. market compliance for food, drugs, medical devices | Medical devices, food contact materials, cosmetics | FDA facility registration number, DMF submission if applicable |
| UL (Underwriters Laboratories) | Safety certification for electrical and fire-risk products | Electronics, appliances, industrial equipment | UL Mark on product, UL database verification |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | All manufacturing sectors | Valid certificate from IAF-accredited body |
| ISO 13485 | QMS for medical device manufacturers | Medical devices | Required for Class II/III devices in many markets |
| RoHS / REACH | Restriction of hazardous substances | Electronics, plastics, textiles | Material test reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) |
Best Practice: Require third-party audit reports (e.g., from TÜV, SGS, Bureau Veritas) and conduct on-site assessments for high-volume or safety-critical components.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Description | Root Causes | Prevention Measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Parts out of specified tolerances | Poor tooling, machine calibration drift, operator error | Implement FAI, use calibrated CNC machines, require GD&T drawings |
| Material Substitution | Use of non-approved or inferior materials | Cost-cutting, lack of traceability | Enforce MTCs, conduct material testing (e.g., XRF for metals), audit BOM compliance |
| Surface Defects (Scratches, Pitting) | Cosmetic or functional surface damage | Poor handling, mold contamination, incorrect plating | Define surface finish standards (Ra values), use protective packaging, inspect pre-shipment |
| Welding Defects | Porosity, cracks, incomplete fusion | Incorrect parameters, poor electrode quality | Require welding procedure specifications (WPS), use certified welders (e.g., AWS/ISO 9606) |
| PCBA Failures | Short circuits, cold joints, missing components | Solder paste issues, reflow profile errors | Enforce IPC-A-610 standards, conduct AOI and X-ray inspection |
| Packaging Damage | Crushed boxes, moisture ingress | Inadequate packaging design, poor logistics handling | Perform drop and vibration testing, use desiccants and ESD-safe packaging where needed |
| Labeling & Documentation Errors | Incorrect barcodes, missing manuals, language errors | Miscommunication, lack of QA checks | Final audit checklist, bilingual verification, sample review pre-shipment |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Supplier Tiering: Classify suppliers by risk (e.g., high-risk for medical/automotive; low-risk for non-critical hardware). Apply stricter audits for high-risk tiers.
- Third-Party Inspections: Schedule pre-shipment inspections (PSI) via agencies like SGS, Intertek, or TÜV.
- Onboarding Audits: Conduct initial factory audits (e.g., using SMETA or BSCI frameworks) to assess capability and compliance.
- Quality Agreements: Formalize defect tolerance levels (AQL 1.0–2.5), inspection protocols, and corrective action procedures (CAPA).
- Digital Traceability: Leverage QR codes or RFID tags for batch-level tracking and recall readiness.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
For sourcing support, factory audits, or compliance validation in China, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence Report:
China Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Branding Strategy for Procurement Leaders
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant manufacturing hub, but its ecosystem has evolved beyond low-cost labor. In 2026, strategic sourcing requires nuanced understanding of OEM/ODM capabilities, tiered cost structures, and branding models. This report provides data-driven insights for optimizing procurement decisions while navigating China’s transition toward automation, sustainability compliance, and value-added manufacturing.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
Critical distinctions for brand control, IP protection, and margin strategy:
| Model | Definition | Best For | Risk Exposure | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Supplier’s pre-existing product rebranded under buyer’s label. Minimal design input. | Startups, testing new markets, low-budget entries | High (generic designs, IP ownership ambiguity) | 30-45 days |
| Private Label | Subset of White Label. Buyer commissions exclusive product design/manufacture (OEM/ODM), retaining full IP and branding control. | Established brands, premium positioning, long-term market play | Moderate (requires robust IP contracts) | 60-90+ days |
Key Insight: In 2026, 78% of SourcifyChina clients opt for Private Label via ODM to balance speed-to-market with IP security. True “White Label” (off-the-shelf rebranding) is declining due to market saturation.
2026 China Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on mid-tier consumer electronics (e.g., wireless earbuds). All figures in USD.
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key 2026 Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 62% | • Rising rare-earth mineral costs (+8% YoY) • Stricter RoHS/REACH compliance (+5%) • Supply chain diversification (Vietnam/Mexico backups) |
| Labor | 18% | • Automation reducing direct labor (-12% YoY) • Skilled technician wages up 6% • “Robot density” in Dongguan/Shenzhen: 1,200+/10k workers |
| Packaging | 12% | • Mandatory recycled materials (+15% cost) • Anti-counterfeit tech (NFC tags, holograms) • Carbon-neutral shipping requirements |
| Overhead/Profit | 8% | • Energy transition compliance (solar/wind usage) • ESG audits (+$0.03/unit) • Logistics volatility buffer |
Note: Labor’s shrinking share reflects China’s “Industry 4.0” shift – factories now compete on precision engineering, not wage arbitrage.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Illustrative Example: Wireless Earbuds)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Packaging Cost | Total Cost Savings vs. 500 MOQ | Supplier Flexibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $18.50 | $11.47 | $3.33 | $2.22 | — | Low (fixed specs only) |
| 1,000 | $16.20 | $10.04 | $2.92 | $1.94 | 12.4% | Medium (color variants) |
| 5,000 | $13.80 | $8.56 | $2.48 | $1.66 | 25.4% | High (custom molds, firmware) |
Critical Assumptions:
– Materials: Includes 10% buffer for rare-earth volatility (e.g., neodymium).
– Labor: Assumes 40% automation rate (vs. 25% in 2022).
– Packaging: Meets EU EcoDesign Directive 2025 + US FTC “Green Guides”.
– MOQ 5,000: Enables shared tooling costs; ideal for Private Label ODM partnerships.
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Prioritize ODM Partners Over Pure OEM: Leverage Chinese suppliers’ R&D capabilities (e.g., Shenzhen’s hardware startups) for faster innovation. 83% of SourcifyChina’s top clients use hybrid ODM models.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Target “staged MOQs” (e.g., 500 → 1,000 → 5,000) with tiered pricing to reduce inventory risk.
- Embed Sustainability Costs Early: Factor ESG compliance into all quotes – retrofits cost 3x more post-PO.
- Secure IP via China’s New Systems: Use the 2025 “Cross-Border IP Portal” for real-time patent tracking. Never rely solely on NDAs.
- Avoid “White Label” Traps: Demand factory audits to verify if products are truly exclusive (not sold to competitors).
SourcifyChina Advisory: “China isn’t ‘cheap’ in 2026 – it’s ‘strategically efficient.’ Winners optimize for resilience, not just unit cost. Partner with suppliers who invest in automation and ESG, not wage suppression.”
Next Step: Request our complimentary 2026 China Supplier Scorecard (covering 12 industrial clusters) to vet partners beyond Alibaba listings.
Data Sources: China Customs 2025, World Bank Manufacturing Pulse, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q1 2026).
Disclaimer: Costs are estimates for planning purposes. Actual pricing requires product specifications and factory assessment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Executive Use Only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers & Distinguish Factories from Trading Companies
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, China remains a dominant force in manufacturing and export. However, procurement risks—especially misrepresentation of supplier identity and operational capacity—persist. This report outlines a structured verification framework to help procurement professionals identify authentic manufacturers, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common red flags.
By implementing these steps, sourcing teams can reduce supply chain risk, ensure product quality, and optimize cost-efficiency.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business License (营业执照) | Validate legal registration and scope of operations | Request copy of license; verify via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site or Third-Party Audit | Assess real production capacity, equipment, and workforce | Use SourcifyChina Audit Reports, SGS, TÜV, or on-site visits |
| 1.3 | Verify Factory Address & Physical Presence | Ensure the facility is operational and not a virtual office | Satellite imagery (Google Earth), video walkthrough, GPS check-in |
| 1.4 | Review Export History & Customs Data | Confirm actual export capability and shipment consistency | Analyze via Panjiva, ImportGenius, or Alibaba Trade Assurance records |
| 1.5 | Request Production Documentation | Validate in-house manufacturing capability | Ask for machine lists, production flowcharts, QC protocols, and employee count |
| 1.6 | Check References & Client Portfolio | Assess reliability and past performance | Contact 2–3 verified client references; verify brand collaborations |
| 1.7 | Evaluate IP & Compliance Certifications | Ensure adherence to international standards | Look for ISO 9001, ISO 14001, BSCI, SEDEX, or industry-specific certifications |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Many suppliers present themselves as factories while operating as trading intermediaries. This distinction is critical for cost control, lead time accuracy, and quality oversight.
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists production activities (e.g., “plastic injection molding”) | Lists “trade,” “import/export,” or “sales” without production terms |
| Facility Footprint | Large space with machinery, production lines, and raw material storage | Office-only space; no visible production equipment |
| Production Control | Can provide process details, machine types, and in-house QC checks | Limited knowledge of production timelines or technical specs |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes based on material + labor + overhead; may lack packaging options | Often includes markup; may offer multiple product categories from various sources |
| MOQ Flexibility | MOQ based on production line capacity | MOQ may be inconsistent or unusually low (aggregated from multiple sources) |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and production managers available for technical discussion | Sales representatives dominate communication |
| Website & Marketing | Focus on machinery, process, factory tours | Showcases wide product range across unrelated categories |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask, “Can I speak with your production manager?” or “Show me your CNC machine line via live video.” Factories typically accommodate; traders often deflect.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in Chinese Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| No verifiable factory address or refusal to provide business license | High risk of scam or shell company | Disqualify supplier immediately |
| Unrealistically low pricing compared to market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud | Request detailed cost breakdown; verify material specs |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses during due diligence | Poor operational discipline or lack of transparency | Escalate to senior management or disqualify |
| Claims of being a “factory” but only offers third-party logistics (e.g., drop-shipping from Alibaba) | Likely a trader masking as manufacturer | Demand proof of in-house production |
| No independent certifications or audit history | Higher quality and compliance risk | Require third-party audit before PO |
| Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT before production) | Financial risk and potential scam | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic or stock photos used for factory tour | Misrepresentation of facilities | Request real-time video call with GPS location enabled |
4. SourcifyChina Best Practices: 2026 Sourcing Protocol
To mitigate risk and ensure supply chain integrity, we recommend the following protocol:
- Pre-Screening: Use NECIPS and Alibaba Gold Supplier status as baseline filters.
- Tiered Verification: Classify suppliers as Tier 1 (verified factory), Tier 2 (trading with factory partners), Tier 3 (unverified).
- Audit Mandate: Require third-party audit for all Tier 1 suppliers before first order.
- Payment Security: Use Trade Assurance, Letter of Credit (LC), or Escrow for initial orders.
- Pilot Order: Start with a small production run to validate quality and reliability.
- Ongoing Monitoring: Conduct annual audits and performance reviews.
Conclusion
Identifying authentic manufacturers in China requires diligence, technical verification, and structured due diligence. By distinguishing true factories from trading intermediaries and recognizing early red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, cost-effective, and compliant supply chains.
SourcifyChina continues to support global buyers with verified supplier networks, audit services, and end-to-end sourcing oversight in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Strategic Procurement Intelligence for Global Supply Chains
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers & Supply Chain Executives
Date: January 15, 2026
Report Focus: Optimizing China Sourcing Efficiency in a High-Complexity Market
The 2026 China Sourcing Reality: Time is Your Scarcest Resource
Global supply chains face unprecedented volatility in 2026: fragmented logistics, stringent ESG compliance demands, and rising operational opacity among Chinese manufacturers. Traditional methods to identify viable suppliers (“what companies are in China?”) now consume 17–22 hours/week per procurement specialist (per 2025 Gartner Sourcing Survey), with 43% of initial leads failing basic credibility checks. This delays time-to-market, inflates costs, and exposes organizations to compliance and quality risks.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Costly Sourcing Guesswork
Our Pro List is not a directory—it’s a pre-qualified, real-time intelligence platform backed by SourcifyChina’s 12-year on-ground verification ecosystem. Below is the operational impact for procurement teams:
| Sourcing Challenge (2026) | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage | Time Saved/Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | Manual checks (business licenses, export history, site visits) | Triple-verified: 1) On-site audit 2) Export documentation 3) Production capacity validation | 18–24 hours |
| Compliance Risk | Reactive audits; 32% face ESG/customs delays (McKinsey 2025) | Pre-screened for ISO, BSCI, China GB standards; real-time regulatory alerts | 9–12 hours |
| RFQ Efficiency | 50+ unvetted quotes; 68% mismatched capabilities | 3–5 precision-matched suppliers with live capacity data | 14–20 hours |
| Quality Assurance | Post-shipment defects; 22% rework costs (Deloitte 2025) | Factory QC protocols embedded; historical defect rates tracked | 7–10 hours |
| Total Impact | 41–66 hours wasted monthly | Strategic hours reclaimed for value-driven decisions | ≥50 hours |
Your Strategic Imperative: Transform Sourcing from Cost Center to Competitive Advantage
In 2026, procurement leaders who leverage verified intelligence reduce supplier onboarding time by 63% and cut supply chain disruptions by 41% (BCG Procurement Index). The Pro List delivers:
✅ Zero Guesswork: Every supplier confirmed via SourcifyChina’s proprietary China Operational Integrity Framework™.
✅ Dynamic Intelligence: Real-time updates on factory capacity, labor shifts, and regulatory changes.
✅ Risk Mitigation: ESG compliance baked into supplier profiles—avoid $250k+ average customs penalty.
Call to Action: Reclaim 50+ Hours This Quarter. Start Now.
Procurement leaders who act before Q2 2026 secure:
🔹 Priority access to 2026’s highest-capacity, ESG-compliant factories (allocations closing March 31).
🔹 Free 30-minute Strategic Sourcing Assessment with a Senior SourcifyChina Consultant.
🔹 Guaranteed 48-hour supplier shortlist for your next RFQ.
Do not let legacy sourcing methods erode your Q2 margins.
→ Email: [email protected]
→ WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Procurement Hotline)
Reply by February 15, 2026 to receive our 2026 China Sourcing Risk Radar Report (valued at $1,200)—complimentary for qualified procurement managers.
SourcifyChina: Powering 1,200+ Global Brands with Verified China Sourcing Intelligence Since 2014.
All Pro List suppliers undergo 11-point verification including site audits, financial health checks, and export compliance validation. Zero cold calls—only strategic partnership.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
