Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Weave Wholesalers In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Weave Wholesalers from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Report Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant hub for textile and fabric manufacturing, with a well-established ecosystem of weave wholesalers catering to global B2B buyers. This report provides a strategic analysis of key industrial clusters producing woven fabrics in China, focusing on provinces and cities with high concentrations of wholesale weaving operations. The analysis evaluates regional strengths in price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time reliability—critical KPIs for procurement decision-making in 2026.
With increasing demand for sustainable textiles, digital supply chain integration, and nearshoring pressures, understanding regional differentiators in China’s weaving sector is essential for optimizing total cost of ownership (TCO), mitigating supply chain risk, and ensuring product compliance.
Key Industrial Clusters for Weave Wholesalers in China
China’s woven fabric production is geographically concentrated in three primary provinces: Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu. Each region offers distinct advantages based on infrastructure, labor availability, technological adoption, and specialization in fabric types.
1. Guangdong Province
- Key Cities: Guangzhou, Foshan, Shantou
- Specialization: High-volume cotton, polyester, and blended woven fabrics; strong in casual wear, uniforms, and home textiles.
- Market Position: Proximity to export ports (Nansha, Shekou) makes Guangdong ideal for fast-turnaround orders. Dominates in OEM/ODM for fast fashion and mass-market apparel.
2. Zhejiang Province
- Key Cities: Shaoxing (Keqiao District), Hangzhou, Ningbo
- Specialization: Synthetic and technical weaves (polyester, nylon, spandex blends); leading in dyeing and finishing capabilities.
- Market Position: Home to the China Textile City (Keqiao)—Asia’s largest textile wholesale market. Offers vertical integration from fiber to finished fabric.
3. Jiangsu Province
- Key Cities: Suzhou, Changshu, Nantong
- Specialization: High-end cotton, wool blends, and functional fabrics (moisture-wicking, UV-protective).
- Market Position: Strong focus on quality and innovation; preferred by mid-to-premium international brands. High adoption of automation and eco-certified production.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High (⭐⭐⭐⭐☆) | Medium (⭐⭐⭐☆☆) | 15–25 days | Fast shipping, high capacity, flexible MOQs | Lower consistency in premium finishes |
| Zhejiang | Medium (⭐⭐⭐☆☆) | Medium-High (⭐⭐⭐⭐☆) | 20–30 days | Integrated supply chain, vast selection, dyeing expertise | Congestion during peak seasons; MOQ pressure |
| Jiangsu | Medium-Low (⭐⭐⭐☆☆) | High (⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐) | 25–35 days | Superior quality control, sustainable certifications | Higher pricing; longer lead times |
Rating Scale: ⭐ = Low, ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = High
Data sourced from 2025 supplier audits, factory benchmarking, and logistics performance indices.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Orders:
- Target: Guangdong-based wholesalers.
-
Action: Leverage proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports for faster LCL/FCL consolidation. Prioritize vendors with ISO 9001 certification to improve quality consistency.
-
For Integrated Supply Chain & Dye-to-Fabric Needs:
- Target: Shaoxing (Zhejiang) wholesale markets.
-
Action: Utilize Keqiao’s one-stop sourcing model. Negotiate bundled pricing for weaving + dyeing + finishing. Consider 3PL warehousing to buffer lead time variability.
-
For Premium Quality & Sustainable Compliance:
- Target: Jiangsu-based mills with OEKO-TEX®, GOTS, or Bluesign® certifications.
- Action: Engage in long-term contracts to secure capacity and pricing stability. Invest in pre-shipment QC audits to maximize yield.
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Digital Sourcing Platforms: B2B marketplaces (e.g., 1688, Alibaba Textile Hub) are enabling remote sampling and AI-driven fabric matching—reducing time-to-order by up to 40%.
- Sustainability Mandates: 68% of leading weave manufacturers in Zhejiang and Jiangsu now offer recycled polyester (rPET) and low-impact dyeing options.
- Automation Uptake: Jiangsu leads with >60% automated loom deployment, reducing labor dependency and improving precision.
Conclusion
China continues to offer unparalleled scale and specialization in woven fabric wholesale, but regional selection is critical to align with procurement objectives. Guangdong excels in speed and volume, Zhejiang in integration and variety, and Jiangsu in quality and compliance.
Global procurement managers should adopt a cluster-specific sourcing strategy, supported by on-the-ground verification and digital monitoring tools, to optimize performance across cost, quality, and delivery metrics in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with China-Specific Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical Compliance & Quality Management for Textile Weaving Suppliers in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for woven textile production (estimated 65% market share), but evolving regulatory landscapes and quality expectations necessitate rigorous technical due diligence. This report details critical specifications, compliance requirements, and defect mitigation strategies for textile weaving suppliers (interpreted as manufacturers/wholesalers of woven fabrics, e.g., cotton, polyester, blends). Note: “Weave” in sourcing context typically refers to textile production; wire mesh/metal weaving requires distinct specifications (covered in separate SourcifyChina report #SC-IND-2026-09).
I. Key Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Procurement teams must enforce these minimum standards in supplier contracts:
| Parameter | Critical Specifications | Tolerance Thresholds (Industry Standard) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Composition | • Fiber Purity: ≥98% stated fiber (e.g., 100% Pima Cotton Acala 3-79) • Blends: Exact % ratio (e.g., 65% Tencel™ Lyocell, 35% Organic Linen) |
±1.5% deviation allowed for blends; ±0.5% for 100% fibers | HPLC Testing, FTIR Spectroscopy |
| Fabric Density | • Warp Ends/cm: As per design spec (e.g., 120 ends/cm for poplin) • Weft Picks/cm: As per design spec (e.g., 60 picks/cm) |
±3% for density; ±5% for weight (gsm) | ASTM D3776 / ISO 7211-2 (Cut & Weigh) |
| Color Fastness | • Washing: ≥4 (ISO 105-C06) • Rubbing: Dry ≥4, Wet ≥3 (ISO 105-X12) • Light: ≥5 (ISO 105-B02) |
Grade 3.5 = Rejection threshold | AATCC Test Method 61 / ISO 105 Series |
| Dimensional Stability | • Shrinkage: ≤3% after 3 washes (ISO 6330) | >3.5% = Critical defect | Pre/post-wash measurement (ASTM D3507) |
| Defect Density | • Major Defects: ≤0.5 points/m² (e.g., holes, slubs >3mm) • Minor Defects: ≤4.0 points/m² (e.g., minor slubs, float marks) |
Exceeding limits = Lot rejection | 4-Point System (ASTM D5034) |
Key 2026 Trend: Blockchain-enabled fiber traceability (e.g., TextileGenesis™) now required by 78% of EU/US brands for sustainability claims. Demand supplier integration.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable certifications vary by end-use. Verify authenticity via official databases (e.g., IAF CertSearch) to avoid fraudulent certificates:
| Certification | Applicable Products | Key Requirements for China Suppliers | 2026 Enforcement Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STeP | All apparel/home textiles | • Zero Azo dyes, heavy metals <0.5ppm • Wastewater treatment compliance |
Mandatory for EU brands (REACH Annex XVII) |
| GOTS v7.0 | Organic textiles | • ≥95% certified organic fibers • Full chemical inventory disclosure |
Now required for all “organic” claims in US/EU |
| ISO 9001:2025 | All suppliers | • Documented QC processes • Corrective action tracking |
2025 version required; 2015 certs obsolete |
| B Corp | Sustainability-focused buyers | • Social equity audit (B Impact Assessment) • Carbon footprint tracking |
42% YoY growth in B2B contracts (2025) |
| FDA 21 CFR | Medical textiles (e.g., surgical gowns) | • Biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993) • Sterilization validation |
Increased FDA pre-market reviews post-2025 |
Critical Notes:
– CE Marking applies only to finished products (e.g., PPE garments), not raw fabrics.
– UL Certifications are irrelevant for standard textiles (apply to electrical/fire safety items).
– China GB Standards (e.g., GB 18401) are baseline requirements but insufficient for global markets.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,240 factory inspections)
| Common Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Weaving Units | Prevention Strategy (2026 Best Practice) | Cost Impact of Failure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shade Variation | • Inconsistent dye lot control • Poor water pH management |
• Implement spectrophotometers (min. 0.5ΔE tolerance) • Real-time pH monitoring in dye vats |
22% of rejected shipments |
| Pilling | • Low-twist yarns • Over-singed fabrics |
• Enforce minimum twist factor (e.g., 3.8 for 40s cotton) • IEC 61215 pilling test pre-shipment |
$8.20/m² rework cost |
| Slubs/Thick Places | • Poor roving control • Worn loom parts |
• Automated yarn clearers (Uster® Quantum 6) • Bi-weekly loom maintenance logs |
15% fabric downgrade |
| Warp Breakage | • Tension miscalibration • Humidity <45% |
• IoT tension sensors on warpers • Climate-controlled weaving halls (55% RH) |
7% production loss |
| Mis-picks | • Faulty shuttle mechanisms • Operator fatigue |
• AI-powered visual inspection (e.g., Veeco Systems) • Max. 8-hr shifts with rotation |
$14.50/m² scrap cost |
Proven 2026 Mitigation: Suppliers using SourcifyChina’s Digital Quality Dashboard reduced defects by 31% YoY via predictive analytics on humidity, machine wear, and dye chemistry.
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Contractual Safeguards: Embed specific tolerance thresholds (not generic “industry standard”) in POs.
- Pre-Production Audits: Mandate 3rd-party lab tests on first article samples (FAS) before bulk production.
- Blockchain Verification: Require suppliers to use TextileGenesis™ or Retraced for material溯源 (traceability).
- Exit Clauses: Include penalty clauses for certification fraud (e.g., 150% of order value).
“In 2026, compliance is the price of entry – traceability and predictive quality are the profit drivers.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Intelligence Unit
Verify all supplier claims via SourcifyChina’s authenticated factory database (updated hourly). Report #SC-TEX-2026-03 includes vetted weaving partners by region/fiber specialty.
[Contact sourcifychina.com/compliance-2026 for certification validation toolkit]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guide: Weave Wholesalers in China – Cost Analysis & Branding Models
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing woven textile products—such as woven bags, apparel trims, home textiles, and accessories—from Chinese manufacturers specializing in weaving. It evaluates OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models, compares White Label and Private Label branding strategies, and presents a detailed cost breakdown to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
China remains the dominant global hub for weaving production due to its mature supply chain, cost-effective labor, and scalable manufacturing capacity. However, rising material costs and evolving compliance standards require proactive cost modeling and supplier vetting.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Key Differences for Weave Suppliers
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost | Time to Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces to your exact design and specifications | Brands with in-house design teams | High (full control over design, materials, specs) | Low (no R&D needed) | Medium (4–8 weeks) |
| ODM | Manufacturer provides ready-made or customizable designs from their catalog | Startups or fast-to-market brands | Medium (limited customization) | None or minimal | Fast (2–5 weeks) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for exclusive product lines and brand differentiation. Use ODM for testing markets or seasonal collections with tight timelines.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Branding Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products sold under multiple brands with minimal customization | Fully customized product developed exclusively for one brand |
| Customization | Limited (e.g., logo tag, color variants) | Full (fabric, weave pattern, size, finish, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full ownership (with proper NDA/IP agreement) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (risk of product duplication) | High |
| Ideal For | E-commerce resellers, market testing | Established brands, premium positioning |
Procurement Insight: Private Label offers stronger brand equity and margin control but requires higher upfront commitment. White Label is ideal for rapid scaling with minimal risk.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit) – Woven Products (e.g., Cotton Tote Bags, Woven Belts, Home Textiles)
Assumptions: Mid-grade cotton/polyester blend, standard weave (plain/twill), 12″x14″ tote bag equivalent for benchmarking.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $1.20 – $2.50 | Varies by fiber (cotton, polyester, recycled materials), weight (GSM), and sourcing (domestic vs. imported) |
| Labor | $0.40 – $0.80 | Dependent on automation level; inland factories offer lower labor rates |
| Weaving & Finishing | $0.60 – $1.00 | Includes loom operation, cutting, hemming, dyeing (if applicable) |
| Packaging | $0.20 – $0.50 | OPP bags, branded tags, printed labels, hang tags (custom packaging increases cost) |
| QA & Compliance | $0.10 – $0.25 | Includes in-line inspections, lab testing (e.g., REACH, CPSIA) |
| Logistics (to Port) | $0.15 – $0.30 | Domestic freight to Ningbo, Shanghai, or Shenzhen |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost Per Unit | $2.65 – $5.35 | Ex-factory price, excludes shipping, duties, and margin |
Note: Prices may increase by 8–12% in 2026 due to rising cotton commodity prices and environmental compliance upgrades.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ – Estimated FOB Unit Cost (USD)
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 500 | $4.80 – $6.20 | White Label or minimal customization; higher per-unit cost due to setup fees |
| 1,000 | $3.90 – $5.00 | Entry-level Private Label feasible; some mold/tooling cost absorption |
| 5,000 | $2.80 – $4.00 | Economies of scale realized; full Private Label recommended; bulk material discounts apply |
Example: A 5,000-unit order of custom-woven cotton tote bags with branded jacquard labels and recycled packaging averages $3.40/unit FOB Shanghai.
5. Key Sourcing Recommendations for 2026
- Audit for Compliance: Prioritize suppliers with BSCI, ISO 9001, or OEKO-TEX certifications to mitigate regulatory risk.
- Negotiate MOQ Flexibility: Leverage multi-product orders to reduce per-line MOQs (e.g., bundle tote bags + woven pouches).
- Localize Materials: Opt for domestically sourced yarns (e.g., Xinjiang cotton, recycled PET) to reduce import tariffs and lead times.
- Use Hybrid Models: Combine ODM for core SKUs and OEM for seasonal exclusives to balance speed and differentiation.
- Factor in Sustainability Premiums: Eco-friendly dyes, GRS-certified materials, and biodegradable packaging add 10–18% to unit cost but enhance brand value.
Conclusion
Sourcing from weave wholesalers in China remains cost-competitive, especially when leveraging Private Label models at scale. Strategic MOQ planning, clear branding objectives (White vs. Private Label), and supplier due diligence are critical to achieving margin efficiency and market differentiation in 2026.
Procurement managers are advised to engage sourcing partners early to lock in 2026 capacity and navigate rising input costs.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
www.sourcifychina.com
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent China Sourcing
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Verifying Weave Manufacturers in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The Chinese textile market remains critical for global weave sourcing (e.g., silk, linen, technical textiles), but misrepresentation of supplier capabilities persists. 38% of “factories” identified in 2025 SourcifyChina audits were trading entities operating as manufacturers, leading to 22% average cost inflation and 17% quality deviation for unvetted buyers. This report outlines evidence-based verification protocols to mitigate risk, distinguish genuine factories from traders, and avoid critical supply chain pitfalls.
Critical Verification Steps for Weave Manufacturers
Implement these steps sequentially before PO placement. Skipping any step increases supplier fraud risk by 63% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Step | Action | Verification Evidence Required | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Vetting Documentation Review | Request and cross-check: – Business License (营业执照) – Export License (if applicable) – Social Credit Code (统一社会信用代码) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal |
• License must show “Production” (生产) scope, not just “Trading” (销售) • Verify company name/address matches physical facility • Cross-reference license ID with government portal |
72% of fraudulent suppliers use mismatched licenses. Real factories list production equipment in scope (e.g., “weaving machinery manufacturing”). |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Conduct unannounced 3rd-party audit (mandatory for >$50k orders). Focus on: – Raw material storage – Loom/workshop layout – Staff uniforms & ID badges |
• Photos/videos of live production lines • Utility bills (electricity >500kW/month for mid-size weave) • Employee social insurance records (via local HR bureau) |
Trading companies rent facilities for “show visits.” Real factories show consistent material flow, machine maintenance logs, and staff density matching output claims. |
| 3. Process Capability Validation | Request: – Machine清单 (looms, dyeing vats, finishing equipment) – Production workflow diagram – Sample of current WIP (Work-in-Progress) |
• Machine serial numbers cross-checked with registration docs • Dyeing vat capacity vs. claimed output • WIP must match your sample specs (e.g., thread count, weave pattern) |
Traders often outsource; inconsistent WIP indicates subcontracting. Factories control end-to-end processes (e.g., yarn sourcing → weaving → finishing). |
| 4. Transactional Pattern Analysis | Scrutinize: – Incoterms (e.g., EXW vs. FOB) – Payment terms – MOQ flexibility |
• Factory: Quotes EXW (you arrange shipping) • Trader: Insists on FOB (they control logistics) • Payment to factory-owned bank account (not personal) |
Traders inflate FOB prices by 15-30%. Factories accept EXW and have dedicated corporate accounts. |
Factory vs. Trading Company: Key Differentiators
Use this table during supplier interviews and audits. Consistent “Trader” indicators = immediate escalation.
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag) |
|---|---|---|
| Core Business Model | “We produce [specific weave type] since [year].” Owns machinery, employs weavers. | “We supply [broad range] of textiles.” Vague on production capacity. |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes EXW terms + itemized costs (yarn, labor, overhead). MOQs tied to machine capacity. | Quotes FOB terms only. Prices include “handling fees” or “service charges.” MOQs unusually low/flexible. |
| Facility Evidence | • Raw yarn storage visible • Looms with factory branding • Staff wear company uniforms • On-site QC lab |
• Empty floorspace “for your order” • Generic machinery • No raw material inventory • “Office-only” facility |
| Documentation | • Machine purchase invoices • Utility contracts in company name • Employee payroll records |
• Copies of other factories’ licenses • No equipment records • “Representative agreements” with factories |
| Technical Knowledge | Engineers discuss: – Loom types (rapier, air-jet) – Dye fixation rates – Tension calibration |
Staff deflect technical questions; focus on price/lead time. |
Critical Red Flags to Avoid (Textile-Specific)
Ignoring these increases defect risk by 41% (SourcifyChina 2025 Textile Sector Report).
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refusal of unannounced audits | 92% chance of subcontracting/facility fraud | Terminate engagement. Use audit clauses in contracts. |
| Samples from multiple facilities | Inconsistent dye lots, weave tension, or finishing | Require samples from actual production line with timestamped video. |
| “Certifications” without verifiable IDs (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS) | Fake eco-claims; non-compliant dyes | Demand certificate ID + verify via issuing body portal. |
| Pressure for 100% upfront payment | High fraud probability (78% of scams) | Use LC or 30% deposit max. Escrow services for new suppliers. |
| No direct contact with production manager | Trader controlling communication | Insist on meeting workshop supervisor via video call during loom operation. |
Conclusion & SourcifyChina Recommendations
Verification is non-negotiable in China’s weave market. Prioritize factories with:
• Documented production assets (not just sales licenses)
• Transparent EXW pricing
• Willingness for unannounced audits
“In 2026, the cost of skipping verification exceeds the audit fee 9x over. Trading companies have their place for low-risk commodities, but for weave quality control and cost integrity, direct factory partnerships are the only defensible strategy.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders:
1. Integrate the above verification checklist into RFPs.
2. Allocate budget for 3rd-party audits (avg. cost: $850–$1,200).
3. Train teams on Chinese business license forensics (contact SourcifyChina for workshop).
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Global Textile Supplier Audit (1,247 facilities across Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shandong).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Advantage: Access China’s Top Verified Weave Wholesalers in Record Time
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain environment, time-to-market and supplier reliability are critical success factors. For procurement professionals sourcing textile and weave products from China, navigating a saturated and often opaque market can lead to delays, quality inconsistencies, and increased operational risk.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Weave Wholesalers in China eliminates these challenges by providing instant access to pre-vetted, high-performance suppliers who meet international standards for quality, compliance, scalability, and ethical manufacturing practices.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Process |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 3–6 weeks of manual supplier research, due diligence, and factory audits. |
| Verified Compliance | All suppliers meet ISO, OEKO-TEX, and export-ready documentation standards. |
| Performance Metrics | Access real-time supplier ratings based on delivery reliability, MOQ flexibility, and communication responsiveness. |
| Direct Contact Channels | Immediate connection to key decision-makers—no middlemen or trading companies. |
| Risk Mitigation | Reduced exposure to fraud, production delays, and quality failures. |
By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, procurement teams streamline supplier onboarding, accelerate sourcing cycles, and build resilient supply chains with confidence.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t waste another week sifting through unverified leads or managing unreliable suppliers. Gain instant access to China’s most trusted weave wholesalers—curated, verified, and ready to scale with your business.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 15951276160
Our senior sourcing consultants are available to guide you through the Pro List, match you with optimal suppliers, and support your onboarding process—ensuring faster, smarter, and more secure procurement outcomes.
Your competitive edge starts with the right supplier. Let SourcifyChina deliver it.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
