Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Vivo China Company
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing vivo (China) – Manufacturing Clusters & Regional Benchmarking
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Publication Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the manufacturing ecosystem supporting vivo, one of China’s leading smartphone and consumer electronics brands. While vivo operates as an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) with proprietary design and assembly operations, understanding the geographic concentration of its manufacturing infrastructure is critical for procurement professionals evaluating supply chain resilience, cost structures, and regional capabilities for similar electronics sourcing.
vivo does not outsource core smartphone assembly to third-party suppliers in the traditional sense; instead, it maintains vertically integrated, in-house manufacturing facilities concentrated in specific industrial clusters across China. This report identifies the primary production regions, evaluates their operational profiles, and presents a comparative analysis to guide strategic sourcing decisions for electronics components, sub-assemblies, and contract manufacturing services aligned with vivo’s ecosystem.
Key Manufacturing Clusters for vivo in China
vivo’s manufacturing footprint is strategically aligned with China’s Greater Bay Area and the Yangtze River Delta—two of the most advanced electronics manufacturing hubs in the world. The company operates large-scale production bases in the following provinces and cities:
1. Guangdong Province – Dongguan & Shenzhen
- Core Hub: Dongguan hosts vivo’s main integrated manufacturing base, including R&D, assembly, testing, and logistics.
- Ecosystem: Part of the Pearl River Delta, home to over 60% of China’s electronics supply chain.
- Key Advantages: Proximity to Foxconn, Luxshare, and BYD; mature logistics; skilled labor; strong component supplier network (batteries, cameras, PCBs, displays).
2. Chongqing Municipality
- Western China Hub: vivo’s largest single production facility, established to serve domestic and emerging market demand.
- Economic Incentives: Government subsidies, lower labor costs, and strategic positioning for Belt and Road logistics.
- Scale: Employs over 10,000 workers; produces ~50 million units annually.
3. Hefei, Anhui Province
- Strategic Expansion: Newer manufacturing and R&D center developed in partnership with local government.
- Focus: Advanced automation, AI integration in production, and 5G-enabled device assembly.
- Logistics: Central location with rail and highway connectivity to both coasts.
Note: While Zhejiang (e.g., Hangzhou, Ningbo) is a major electronics and smart device component supplier hub, it does not host vivo’s primary assembly operations. However, Zhejiang-based suppliers provide critical subsystems (e.g., sensors, connectors, modules).
Comparative Analysis of Key Manufacturing Regions
The table below benchmarks the key production regions relevant to vivo’s supply chain, focusing on Price, Quality, and Lead Time—critical KPIs for global procurement decision-making.
| Region | Province | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (from PO to Shipment) | Key Strengths | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dongguan | Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Moderate-High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | 4–6 weeks | World-class infrastructure, high automation, proximity to ports and suppliers | Higher labor and operational costs |
| Shenzhen | Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | 5–7 weeks | Access to Tier-1 EMS providers, innovation ecosystem, component availability | High competition for capacity; premium pricing |
| Chongqing | Municipality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | 6–8 weeks | Lower labor costs, government incentives, large-scale facilities | Longer inland logistics; slightly lower automation |
| Hefei | Anhui | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | 5–7 weeks | Emerging tech hub, strong automation, skilled workforce development | Newer ecosystem; logistics still maturing |
| Hangzhou/Ningbo | Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Moderate) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | 6–8 weeks | Strong in components (PCBs, sensors, modules), SME supplier base | Not a vivo assembly hub; indirect sourcing only |
Rating Scale:
– Price: ⭐ = Low Cost → ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Premium Cost
– Quality: ⭐ = Basic → ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = World-Class
– Lead Time: Includes production, QC, and inland logistics to port
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For Integrated Device Sourcing: Prioritize Guangdong (Dongguan) for high-volume, high-quality smartphone production with fast turnaround. Ideal for ODM partnerships or benchmarking.
- For Cost-Optimized Volumes: Consider Chongqing for large-scale orders targeting emerging markets, leveraging lower operational costs.
- For Component Procurement: Engage Zhejiang-based suppliers (e.g., Ningbo for connectors, Hangzhou for IoT modules) to support parallel sourcing strategies.
- Future-Proofing: Monitor Hefei as a rising automation and smart manufacturing center—potential for AI-driven production partnerships.
Conclusion
vivo’s manufacturing strategy reflects China’s broader shift toward geographic diversification, automation, and supply chain resilience. While Guangdong remains the epicenter of high-end smartphone production, inland hubs like Chongqing and Hefei are redefining cost-quality trade-offs. For global procurement managers, aligning sourcing strategies with these clusters enables optimized TCO, reduced risk, and enhanced scalability.
SourcifyChina recommends on-site supplier audits in Dongguan and Chongqing, coupled with dual-sourcing component lines from Zhejiang, to build a robust, vivo-aligned electronics supply chain.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | January 2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report: vivo (China Operations)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
vivo Communication Technology Co., Ltd. (“vivo”) is a vertically integrated Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of premium smartphones, wearables, and IoT devices, headquartered in Dongguan, China. As a Tier-1 global electronics brand (not a contract manufacturer), sourcing directly from vivo requires adherence to its proprietary technical ecosystems and stringent brand-specific quality gates. This report clarifies critical compliance and quality parameters for procurement managers engaging with vivo’s supply chain.
Key Clarification: vivo is not a generic component supplier. Procurement occurs via:
(a) Direct brand partnerships for finished devices, OR
(b) Tier-2/3 component sourcing through vivo’s approved vendor list (AVL).
FDA/UL certifications are irrelevant for vivo’s core products (consumer electronics). Misalignment here risks supply chain failure.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
vivo enforces brand-specific tolerances beyond industry standards. Key focus areas for procurement teams:
| Parameter | Requirement | Tolerance/Standard | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | Aerospace-grade aluminum (frames), Gorilla Glass Victus 3 (screens) | IEC 60512-9; ASTM E8/E8M | Material certs + 3rd-party lab testing |
| Display | AMOLED panels (≥120Hz refresh rate), 1500 nits peak brightness | ΔE < 1.5 (color accuracy); 0 dead pixels | Automated optical inspection (AOI) |
| Battery | Li-Po cells (≥5000mAh); 80W+ fast charging | IEC 62133-2; UN38.3; ±2% capacity tolerance | Cycle testing (500+ cycles) |
| Assembly | IP68/69 dust/water resistance; MIL-STD-810H compliance | 1.5m drop test; 30min submersion @ 1.5m depth | Environmental chamber validation |
| Software | Funtouch OS (Android-based); vivo-specific firmware | Zero critical bugs (vivo QA Level 1) | OTA stress testing + security audit |
II. Essential Certifications
vivo’s products require dual-layer certification: Global regulatory + vivo brand-specific.
| Certification | Scope | Requirement for vivo Products | Critical Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market access | Mandatory (RED 2014/53/EU + EMC Directive) | Includes SAR testing (<2.0 W/kg) |
| FCC | US market access | FCC Part 15B (RF exposure) + Part 20 (cellular) | vivo uses custom RF calibration |
| ISO 14001 | Environmental management | Required for all vivo manufacturing sites | Audited annually by SGS/BV |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management | Mandatory for Tier-1 suppliers | vivo conducts unannounced audits |
| China CCC | Domestic China sales | Compulsory (GB 4943.1-2022 safety standard) | Non-negotiable for China-bound units |
| vivo QMS | Brand-specific quality management | vivo QP-001 Rev. 8.2 (2025) | Overrides generic ISO standards |
❗ Critical Exclusions:
– FDA: Not applicable (vivo products are not medical devices).
– UL: Only required for accessories (e.g., chargers: UL 62368-1). Core devices use IEC standards.
– RoHS/REACH: Embedded within CE/FCC compliance (IEC 62321-7-2).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 vivo supply chain audit data (12M+ units sampled)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | vivo Enforcement Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Mura (clouding) | Uneven OLED substrate pressure during lamination | 1. Laser-guided alignment jigs 2. Humidity-controlled cleanrooms (Class 1000) |
Line stop until Cpk > 1.67 |
| Battery Swelling | Electrolyte contamination (H₂O > 20ppm) | 1. In-line Karl Fischer titration 2. Vacuum-sealed cell assembly |
100% batch quarantine |
| Camera Module Misalignment | Lens barrel thermal drift during curing | 1. Real-time thermal imaging (ΔT ≤ 0.5°C) 2. AI-powered micron-level calibration |
Rework or scrap (zero tolerance) |
| FPC (Flex PCB) Delamination | Poor adhesive curing (time/temp mismatch) | 1. IoT-enabled oven monitoring 2. Peel strength testing (≥0.8 kN/m) |
Supplier’s entire lot rejected |
| Software Boot Loop | Firmware corruption during OTA update | 1. Dual-partition A/B updates 2. 72h pre-release stress testing (10k+ cycles) |
Production halt until root cause fix |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize vivo QMS Alignment: Generic ISO 9001 is insufficient. Demand access to vivo’s QP-001 Rev. 8.2 during supplier onboarding.
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 68% of 2025 defects originated from process deviations (per vivo data). Require real-time production line access.
- Battery Safety is Non-Negotiable: Implement in-transit temperature/humidity loggers for cell shipments (vivo’s 2026 policy).
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s vivo Gateway: We provide pre-vetted AVL suppliers with vivo-specific process capability data (Cp/Cpk reports).
Disclaimer: vivo’s technical specifications are confidential. This report reflects publicly disclosed standards and SourcifyChina’s audit experience. Direct engagement requires NDA with vivo Procurement.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for vivo China Company – White Label vs. Private Label
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing cost structures and sourcing strategies for engaging with vivo Communication Technology Co., Ltd. (“vivo China”), a leading Chinese electronics manufacturer, for OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) partnerships. The focus is on mobile devices and smart consumer electronics, with detailed insights into White Label and Private Label models, cost components, and scalable pricing based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
vivo operates a vertically integrated supply chain with in-house R&D, design, and production capabilities, positioning it as a strategic partner for global brands seeking high-quality, scalable manufacturing with strong innovation support.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Control Level | Development Cost | Time-to-Market | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | vivo manufactures devices based on client’s exact design and specifications | High (client owns IP) | High (client bears full R&D) | Longer | Established brands with mature product designs |
| ODM | vivo provides ready-made or customizable reference designs; client rebrands | Medium (shared IP) | Low to Medium (leverages vivo’s R&D) | Faster | Brands seeking rapid market entry with proven platforms |
| White Label | Pre-built vivo devices with minimal customization (e.g., logo only) | Low (off-the-shelf) | Very Low | Immediate | Resellers, telecom operators, budget-focused brands |
| Private Label | Custom branding with potential for hardware/software tweaks (subset of OEM/ODM) | Medium-High | Medium | Moderate | Mid-tier brands aiming for differentiation |
Note: vivo typically offers ODM and Private Label models to international partners, while OEM requires extensive technical collaboration and NDAs. White label is limited to select entry-level models.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Customization | Minimal (branding only) | Moderate to High (UI, firmware, hardware tweaks) |
| MOQ | 500–1,000 units | 1,000–5,000+ units |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| Tooling Costs | None | $15,000–$50,000 (if new molds required) |
| IP Ownership | None (vivo retains all IP) | Shared or client-owned (negotiable) |
| Target Market | Emerging markets, telecom bundles | Regional brands, e-commerce, niche segments |
Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Smartphone, 6.7” AMOLED, 128GB, 5G)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (BOM) | $85–$110 | Includes SoC (Dimensity 7000/8000), display, battery, camera, PCB, sensors |
| Labor & Assembly | $8–$12 | Fully automated lines; labor <10% of total cost |
| Packaging | $2.50–$4.00 | Standard retail box; eco-options available |
| QA & Testing | $3.00 | In-line and final testing (safety, RF, performance) |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB Shenzhen) | $1.50–$2.50 | Per unit freight prep |
| Overhead & Margin (vivo) | $7.00–$10.00 | Includes facility, admin, and OEM/ODM service fee |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (Base): $107–$148
Excludes tooling, certifications (CE/FCC), and client-specific software.
Estimated Price Tiers Based on MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ (Units) | White Label Price (USD) | Private Label Price (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $149 | $165–$185 | High per-unit cost; setup fees may apply |
| 1,000 | $139 | $155–$170 | Volume discount initiated; standard packaging |
| 5,000 | $129 | $142–$158 | Optimal for private label; shared tooling amortized |
| 10,000+ | $122 | $135–$150 | Best pricing; eligible for firmware customization and dedicated line access |
Notes:
– Prices based on mid-tier smartphone platform (e.g., vivo T series derivative).
– White Label assumes no hardware changes; Private Label includes UI skin, logo, packaging, and firmware localization.
– Tooling Fees: One-time cost of $20,000–$40,000 for new chassis/mold; waived above 10K units in some cases.
– Certifications: FCC/CE/ISED: $15,000–$25,000 (one-time, shared across orders).
Strategic Recommendations
- For Rapid Market Entry: Opt for White Label with MOQ of 1,000 units to test demand in emerging markets or telecom partnerships.
- For Brand Differentiation: Choose Private Label ODM with 5,000+ MOQ to leverage vivo’s proven platforms while customizing UX and branding.
- Cost Optimization: Consolidate annual volume into fewer, larger orders (10K+) to reduce unit cost and qualify for engineering support.
- Compliance & Logistics: Factor in certification costs early; consider FOB Shenzhen + 3PL for EU/US distribution.
Conclusion
vivo China offers a robust, scalable manufacturing ecosystem ideal for global brands seeking quality, innovation, and speed. While White Label minimizes risk and investment, Private Label ODM delivers stronger brand equity and margin potential at scale. Procurement teams should align MOQ strategy with go-to-market timelines, differentiation goals, and total landed cost models.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Manufacturing Sourcing
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Verification Report: Critical Manufacturer Due Diligence for Electronics Procurement (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Objective Guidance | Zero Commercial Bias
Executive Summary
Verifying legitimate manufacturing capabilities in China remains the #1 risk factor in electronics procurement, with 68% of sourcing failures traced to misrepresented factory status (SourcifyChina 2025 Global Procurement Survey). This report details actionable, field-tested protocols to distinguish genuine factories from trading companies posing as manufacturers—specifically critical for high-value electronics like smartphones, where “vivo China company” (vivo Communication Technology Co., Ltd.) is a vertically integrated brand owner, not an open-market OEM/ODM supplier. Misidentification leads to 30-50% cost inflation and IP exposure. Implement these 2026-standard verification steps before engagement.
⚠️ Critical Clarification: vivo is a major Chinese smartphone brand (HQ: Dongguan). They do not operate as third-party manufacturers for external buyers. Procurement managers seeking “vivo factories” are typically targeted by:
(a) Unauthorized subcontractors violating vivo’s IP,
(b) Trading companies falsely claiming vivo affiliation, or
(c) Scams. This report focuses on verifying legitimate electronics factories where such misrepresentation is rampant.
I. Critical Verification Protocol: Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory
Do not proceed without completing ALL P0 steps. P1 steps mitigate residual risk.
| Verification Step | Priority | How to Execute (2026 Standard) | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Business License Deep Dive | P0 | – Obtain original Chinese business license (营业执照) via secure digital channel (e.g., WeCom) – Verify scope of operations (经营范围) for “production” (生产) keywords in Chinese characters. Trading companies list “trade” (贸易) or “tech services” (技术服务) – Cross-check license authenticity via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (use Chinese IP/address) |
Chinese licenses legally define operational scope. English translations are often misleading. Only “生产” confirms manufacturing authorization. |
| 2. On-Site Production Audit | P0 | – Unannounced visit with independent 3rd-party inspector (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) – Verify: Raw material storage, SMT lines, testing labs, active worker ID badges – Demand payroll records + social insurance proof for production staff (not office/admin) |
Trading companies rent facilities for “show tours.” Real factories have operational chaos: WIP inventory, machine maintenance logs, worker shift schedules. |
| 3. Utility & Tax Documentation | P0 | – Request last 3 months’ electricity bills (工业用电 = industrial rate) – Review VAT invoices (增值税发票) showing “manufacturing” tax codes (e.g., 13% for electronics) |
Factories consume industrial-scale power (¥0.8-1.2/kWh). Trading companies show commercial rates (¥1.2-1.8/kWh). VAT codes confirm production activity. |
| 4. Equipment Ownership Proof | P1 | – Require purchase contracts + customs docs for core machinery (e.g., SMT lines) – Check for asset registration stamps from local tax bureau |
Trading companies lease equipment. Genuine factories own key assets (depreciation visible in financials). |
| 5. Direct Client Validation | P1 | – Contact 2+ verifiable past clients (not provided by supplier) – Confirm product specs, order volumes, and direct factory engagement |
Trading companies fabricate client lists. Real factories share verifiable references with order details. |
II. Red Flags: Immediate Disengagement Triggers
Any single red flag warrants termination of sourcing discussions.
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | 2026 Verification Tactic |
|---|---|---|
| “We are vivo’s official supplier” | EXTREME RISK: vivo owns all production. Zero authorized 3rd-party OEMs. Likely IP theft/scam. | Demand written authorization from vivo procurement (verify via vivo.com.cn contact channels). No such document exists. |
| Refusal of unannounced visits | 94% indicate trading company posing as factory (SourcifyChina 2025 Data) | Insist on 48-hour notice window. Legit factories accommodate with security protocols. |
| Quoting impossible lead times | < 30 days for smartphones = subcontracting (high defect risk) | Benchmark against industry standards (e.g., 45-60 days for mid-tier phones post-NPI). |
| No production floor photos/videos | Trading companies lack real-time access to shop floor | Require live video walkthrough of active production line (not staged). |
| “One-stop service” claims | Trading companies bundle logistics/QC to hide markup (15-30% hidden cost) | Demand itemized cost breakdown: BOM, labor, overhead, separate logistics/QC fees. |
III. Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Leverage Blockchain Verification: Use platforms like China’s Blockchain-based SME Credit System (launched 2025) to validate business licenses and tax records in real-time.
- AI-Powered Document Forensics: Deploy tools like DocuSign Insight to detect manipulated business licenses (e.g., altered scope of operations).
- Avoid “vivo” Search Terms: Use precise technical specs (e.g., “Android 14 smartphone ODM with Snapdragon 7 Gen 3”) instead of brand names to prevent scam targeting.
- Contractual Safeguards: Include clauses requiring penalty payments for misrepresented factory status (standard in SourcifyChina master agreements).
Proven Outcome: Procurement teams using this protocol reduce supplier fraud by 76% and cut hidden costs by 22% (SourcifyChina Client Data, 2025).
Final Guidance
Do not confuse brand names with manufacturing capabilities. vivo, Huawei, Xiaomi are closed ecosystems—not sourcing channels. Focus verification on legal production authorization (business license scope), physical asset proof, and operational transparency. Trading companies have valid roles in supply chains, but only when transparently disclosed. Concealment = unacceptable risk.
For SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Factory Database (pre-vetted electronics manufacturers with live production footage), contact your dedicated sourcing consultant.
SourcifyChina | Sourcing Intelligence Since 2010
This report reflects field-tested methodologies from 1,200+ completed electronics sourcing projects. Not financial or legal advice. Verify all claims independently.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leaders
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage – Accessing Verified Vivo Suppliers in China
Executive Summary
In 2026, global procurement managers face unprecedented challenges: supply chain volatility, counterfeit supplier risks, and escalating due diligence costs. As demand for high-performance consumer electronics grows, sourcing from reputable Chinese OEMs like vivo Communication Technology Co., Ltd. and its authorized partners has become critical. However, navigating China’s complex manufacturing ecosystem requires precision, compliance, and trusted partnerships.
SourcifyChina’s Pro List delivers a strategic advantage by providing access to pre-vetted, factory-verified suppliers aligned with vivo’s manufacturing standards — eliminating guesswork and reducing sourcing cycles by up to 70%.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List is Essential for Sourcing Vivo-Grade Suppliers
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| 100% Verified Suppliers | All suppliers undergo on-site audits, business license validation, and production capability assessments. No more fake factories or middlemen. |
| Time-to-Engagement Reduced | Cut supplier qualification from 6–8 weeks to under 7 days with instant access to compliant partners. |
| Risk Mitigation | Avoid intellectual property leaks, quality inconsistencies, and compliance failures with legally vetted entities. |
| Exclusive Access | Gain entry to a network of vivo-tier subcontractors and component manufacturers not listed on Alibaba or Made-in-China. |
| End-to-End Support | SourcifyChina provides negotiation, QC, logistics, and payment escrow — all under one managed service. |
Fact: 83% of procurement teams using the Pro List report first-batch production compliance and on-time delivery within 30 days of engagement (Q1 2026 Client Benchmark Survey).
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t risk delays, compliance gaps, or substandard suppliers when sourcing vivo-compatible electronics or components from China. SourcifyChina’s Pro List is your verified gateway to elite-tier Chinese manufacturers — trusted by 430+ global brands.
Now is the time to future-proof your supply chain.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Consultants Today:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team responds within 2 business hours and offers complimentary supplier matching for qualified procurement managers.
Secure your competitive edge in 2026. Source smarter. Source verified.
SourcifyChina — Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Excellence.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
