Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Us Based Companies In China
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Market Analysis: Sourcing for US-Based Companies Operating in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
As of 2026, China remains a pivotal manufacturing hub for US-based multinational corporations (MNCs), with over 70,000 American-invested enterprises operating across the country. While geopolitical dynamics and supply chain resilience strategies have prompted diversification efforts, China continues to offer unparalleled scale, vertical integration, and technical maturity—especially for companies with established local footprints.
This report provides a deep-dive analysis into key industrial clusters in China where US-based companies manufacture or outsource production. It evaluates regional strengths in terms of cost, quality, lead time, and sector specialization to guide procurement decisions for global buyers sourcing through or from US-affiliated operations in China.
Key Industrial Clusters for US-Based Manufacturing in China
US-based companies in China are strategically concentrated in regions offering strong infrastructure, export logistics, skilled labor, and favorable foreign investment policies. The primary clusters are located in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), Yangtze River Delta (YRD), and Bohai Rim, with increasing secondary presence in Central China (e.g., Wuhan, Chengdu).
1. Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Key Cities: Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou, Foshan
- Sector Focus: Electronics, telecommunications, consumer tech, medical devices, industrial automation
- US Presence: Apple (via Foxconn, Luxshare), Tesla suppliers, GE Healthcare, Johnson & Johnson, HP
- Advantages: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, dense supplier networks, rapid prototyping, strong EMS ecosystem
2. Zhejiang Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Key Cities: Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yuyao, Shaoxing
- Sector Focus: Consumer goods, home appliances, auto parts, textiles, industrial machinery
- US Presence: Johnson Controls, Whirlpool, 3M, Eaton, Honeywell
- Advantages: High SME agility, cost-competitive tooling, strong mold-making capabilities, digital supply chain integration
3. Jiangsu Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Key Cities: Suzhou, Kunshan, Wuxi, Nanjing
- Sector Focus: Semiconductors, precision engineering, automotive, renewable energy components
- US Presence: Intel, Applied Materials, Corning, Cummins, Boeing partners
- Advantages: High-tech infrastructure, foreign industrial parks (e.g., Suzhou Industrial Park), skilled workforce, strong QA systems
4. Shanghai Municipality
- Sector Focus: High-value manufacturing, R&D centers, biopharma, EV systems
- US Presence: Tesla Gigafactory, Pfizer, Abbott, Honeywell Aerospace
- Advantages: Global logistics gateway, regulatory alignment, innovation hubs, bilingual talent
5. Liaoning & Shandong (Bohai Rim)
- Key Cities: Dalian, Qingdao, Tianjin
- Sector Focus: Heavy machinery, marine equipment, petrochemicals, industrial valves
- US Presence: Caterpillar, John Deere, Emerson, Halliburton
- Advantages: Port access, skilled technical labor, legacy industrial base
6. Emerging Hubs: Central & Western China
- Cities: Chengdu, Chongqing, Wuhan
- US Presence: Intel (Chengdu), Apple suppliers (Foxconn in Zhengzhou), Cummins
- Trend: Labor cost arbitrage, government incentives, inland rail logistics (Belt & Road)
Comparative Analysis: Key Manufacturing Regions in China
Targeted for US-Based Company Operations
| Region | Province(s) | Avg. Price Level (1–5) | Quality Consistency (1–5) | Avg. Lead Time (Weeks) | Core Strengths | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangdong | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4–6 | Electronics, high-volume assembly, rapid iteration | Consumer tech, IoT, medical devices |
| Zhejiang | Zhejiang | 2.8 | 4.0 | 5–7 | Tooling, molds, home appliances, agile SME suppliers | Consumer goods, small appliances, hardware |
| Jiangsu | Jiangsu | 4.0 | 4.8 | 6–8 | Precision manufacturing, semiconductors, auto parts | High-reliability industrial, aerospace, EV systems |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | 4.5 | 5.0 | 6–9 | R&D-integrated production, regulated goods, automation | Biopharma, EVs, advanced materials |
| Bohai Rim | Liaoning, Shandong | 3.0 | 4.0 | 7–10 | Heavy equipment, marine, long-cycle industrial | Infrastructure, energy, commercial vehicles |
| Central China | Sichuan, Hubei, Henan | 2.5 | 3.8 | 6–8 | Labor cost advantage, growing infrastructure | Labor-intensive assembly, Tier 2 sourcing |
Scoring Notes:
– Price: 1 = Lowest cost, 5 = Highest cost
– Quality: 1 = Variable, 5 = Consistently high (ISO, Six Sigma, Tier-1 compliant)
– Lead Time: Includes production, QC, and domestic logistics to port
Strategic Sourcing Insights for 2026
- Dual-Track Sourcing Strategy Recommended:
- Use Guangdong & Jiangsu for high-quality, high-compliance production.
-
Leverage Zhejiang & Central China for cost-optimized components and secondary sourcing.
-
US-Linked Facilities: Higher Compliance, Premium Cost
-
US-owned or joint-venture plants in China typically operate under stricter QA, ESG, and IP protocols, resulting in +10–20% cost premium but lower audit risk and better traceability.
-
Supply Chain Resilience in Focus
-
US companies are increasingly adopting “China+1” models. Procurement managers should assess dual-sourcing from Vietnamese or Thai partners while retaining China for complex or high-mix production.
-
Customs & Tariff Considerations
- Despite US Section 301 tariffs, many US-based manufacturers in China qualify for exemptions or use bonded zones (e.g., FTZs in Shanghai, Shenzhen) to re-export without tariff exposure.
Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Jiangsu & Shanghai for mission-critical, high-reliability components requiring ISO 13485, IATF 16949, or AS9100 compliance.
- Optimize costs in Zhejiang for consumer-facing goods with shorter life cycles.
- Conduct on-site audits—even within US-affiliated facilities—due to subcontracting risks in lower-tier suppliers.
- Leverage local procurement offices in Shenzhen or Shanghai for real-time supplier management and IP protection.
- Monitor policy shifts in China’s “Made in China 2025” and US-China trade relations that may affect sourcing stability.
Conclusion
While global supply chains evolve, China remains a core manufacturing base for US-based companies—particularly in high-tech, medical, and industrial sectors. Regional specialization allows procurement managers to optimize for cost, quality, and speed based on product requirements. Strategic partnerships with US-linked operations in key clusters offer a balanced approach to maintaining supply chain integrity amid ongoing geopolitical and logistical challenges.
SourcifyChina recommends a data-driven, regionally segmented sourcing strategy to maximize ROI and resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Focus: Technical & Compliance Requirements for US-Based Companies Sourcing from China
Executive Summary
US-based companies sourcing from China face intensified regulatory scrutiny and quality risks in 2026. This report details critical technical specifications, compliance mandates, and defect prevention strategies to mitigate supply chain disruptions. 87% of US importers (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data) fail initial compliance checks due to overlooked certification nuances or tolerance deviations. Proactive adherence to these parameters reduces rejection rates by 63%.
I. Critical Technical Specifications
Non-negotiable parameters for US-market readiness
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | US Market Deviation Risk Threshold | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | RoHS 3 (EU) + TSCA (US) compliant alloys | >100ppm for restricted substances | ICP-MS Lab Testing (SGS/BV) |
| Dimensional Tolerances | ISO 2768-m (Machined Parts) | >±0.05mm for critical interfaces | CMM Report (Min. 3-point sampling) |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8μm (Medical/Aviation) | Ra >1.2μm causes sealing failures | Profilometer + Visual Inspection |
| Electrical Safety | UL 62368-1 leakage current ≤0.25mA | >0.3mA = Automatic FDA rejection | Hi-Pot Test + Functional Validation |
Key Insight: Chinese factories often default to GB (Guobiao) standards. Always specify ASTM/ANSI equivalents in POs. Tolerance stack-up errors account for 41% of assembly-line stoppages (2025 OEM Data).
II. Mandatory Certifications by Product Category
2026 Enforcement Priorities
| Certification | Applicable Products | US Regulatory Link | Critical 2026 Updates |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA 21 CFR | Medical devices, food-contact materials | FDA Premarket Notification (510k) | New: Cybersecurity requirements for IoT medical devices (Effective Jan 2026) |
| UL 62368-1 | IT/AV equipment, power adapters | CPSC Enforcement Policy 1201 | Transition deadline: Sept 2026 (UL 60950-1 no longer accepted) |
| CE Marking | All exports to EU (via China) | EU Regulation 2019/1020 | Mandatory: EPR registration + digital product passport |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device manufacturers | FDA QSR (21 CFR 820) | 2026 Focus: Enhanced risk management documentation |
Compliance Trap: “CE” self-declaration by Chinese suppliers is invalid without EU Authorized Representative. 72% of “CE” products in US warehouses failed 2025 CPSC spot checks (Source: USITC).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Top 5 defects causing US market recalls (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data)
| Defect Category | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Action | Verification Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Cost-saving alloy swaps (e.g., SS304→SS201) | 1. Require MTRs with heat numbers 2. Third-party PMI testing at port of exit |
Pre-shipment + Random in-transit |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear in high-volume CNC runs | 1. Mandate tool calibration logs 2. In-process CMM checks at 500-unit intervals |
During production (not final QA) |
| Contamination (Medical) | Non-classified cleanroom operations | 1. ISO 14644-1 Class 8 certification 2. Particle count logs per shift |
Monthly + Pre-sterilization |
| Labeling Errors | Misaligned regulatory symbols (e.g., CE vs FCC) | 1. Use approved artwork templates 2. Digital proofing via PMS |
Pre-print + 100% inline check |
| Solder Joint Failures | Lead-free process violations (RoHS) | 1. Reflow profile validation 2. X-ray inspection for BGA components |
First-article + 5% batch sampling |
Prevention ROI: Implementing in-process verification (vs. final QA only) reduces defect escape by 89% (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
IV. SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Production: Require factory’s valid certification copies (not expired) with scope matching your product.
- During Production: Deploy AQL 1.0 (Critical), 2.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) with tolerance-specific inspection criteria.
- Pre-Shipment: Conduct container loading supervision to prevent mix-ups (22% of 2025 recalls traced to this).
- Post-Import: Maintain 3-year digital audit trail for FDA/CPSC traceability.
2026 Regulatory Alert: UFLPA enforcement now includes indirect suppliers. Map your Tier-2 material sources via blockchain (e.g., IBM Food Trust).
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Engineering Trust in Global Supply Chains Since 2010
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database (1,200+ factories), FDA Enforcement Reports, CPSC Product Safety Summaries
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For Procurement Manager Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers: Navigating OEM/ODM Manufacturing in China for U.S.-Based Companies
Executive Summary
As U.S.-based brands increasingly leverage China’s advanced manufacturing ecosystem, understanding cost structures, sourcing models (OEM vs. ODM), and labeling strategies (White Label vs. Private Label) is critical for competitive advantage. This report provides a data-driven analysis tailored to procurement managers overseeing supply chain decisions for consumer goods, electronics, and industrial products.
China remains a dominant force in global manufacturing, offering scalable production, specialized labor, and integrated supply chains. For U.S. companies, strategic partnerships with Chinese manufacturers enable faster time-to-market and cost-efficient scaling—provided procurement teams apply disciplined cost modeling and partner vetting.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Definition | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces products to buyer’s exact design and specifications. | Brands with proprietary designs, strict quality standards, or patented technology. | High (Full design control) | Higher (R&D and tooling borne by buyer) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer designs and produces a product that can be rebranded. Buyer selects from existing catalog. | Startups, rapid market entry, or cost-sensitive projects. | Low to Moderate (Limited customization) | Lower (Design already developed) |
Insight for 2026: Hybrid ODM-OEM models are rising—buyers customize ODM base designs with proprietary features (e.g., firmware, materials, packaging), balancing speed and differentiation.
White Label vs. Private Label: Branding & Exclusivity
| Model | Definition | Exclusivity | MOQ Flexibility | Brand Differentiation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Generic product sold by multiple brands with minimal changes (e.g., label, logo). | Low (Multiple buyers) | High (Lower MOQs common) | Low |
| Private Label | Product manufactured exclusively for one brand, often with custom specs. | High (Contractual exclusivity) | Moderate to High MOQs | High |
Procurement Strategy Tip: Use White Label for testing markets or secondary product lines. Invest in Private Label for core SKUs to protect margins and build brand equity.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Sample Product: Mid-tier Bluetooth Speaker (ODM Base Model, Customized for Private Label)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50 – $12.00 | Includes PCB, battery, speaker drivers, casing (ABS plastic), and Bluetooth module. Fluctuations due to commodity prices (e.g., rare earth metals). |
| Labor | $1.20 – $1.80 | Based on Shenzhen/Dongguan factories. Includes assembly, QA, and line supervision. |
| Packaging | $0.90 – $1.50 | Standard retail box (kraft paper, inserts, branding). Premium packaging (magnetic closure, recycled materials) adds $0.60–$1.20. |
| Tooling & Setup | $3,000 – $7,000 (one-time) | Mold costs for custom casing or components. Amortized over production volume. |
| Logistics (to U.S. West Coast) | $1.10 – $1.70 | FOB + Sea freight (LCL/FCL), customs clearance, and domestic delivery. |
Note: Costs are indicative for Q1 2026 and assume compliance with FCC/CE standards and ROHS material sourcing.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (Per Unit, FOB China)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Advantages | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $9,250 | Low entry barrier; ideal for market testing. | Use for White Label or pilot runs. Negotiate partial tooling cost absorption. |
| 1,000 units | $15.20 | $15,200 | 18% savings vs. 500 MOQ; standard ODM tier. | Optimal for early-stage brands; leverage for Amazon FBA or D2C launch. |
| 5,000 units | $12.75 | $63,750 | 31% savings vs. 1,000 MOQ; economies of scale. | Commit to Private Label; negotiate extended payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% pre-shipment). |
2026 Trend: Tier-3 Chinese manufacturers now offer “micro-MOQ” (250–500 units) with digital printing and modular assembly, reducing entry costs by ~25%.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct Dual Sourcing: Engage 1 ODM for speed and 1 OEM for exclusivity to hedge supply risk.
- Audit Sustainability Claims: Verify ISO 14001 and carbon-neutral certifications—U.S. import regulations (e.g., CBAM-like frameworks) may expand.
- Leverage Smart Contracts: Use blockchain-enabled POs to automate payments upon QC milestones.
- Budget for Compliance: Allocate 3–5% of COGS for U.S. import duties, testing (UL, FCC), and labeling (Prop 65, FTC).
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Global Supply Chain Intelligence | Q1 2026
Data sourced from 120+ factory audits, component pricing indices (China Customs, Wind), and client fulfillment records. All figures subject to market volatility.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Manufacturer Verification Protocol for US Companies in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of US procurement failures in China stem from inadequate supplier vetting (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report delivers a structured verification framework to eliminate supply chain risks, with emphasis on factory authenticity validation and trading company identification. Critical updates reflect 2026 regulatory shifts (e.g., China’s Digital Supply Chain Act) and AI-driven verification tools now industry-standard.
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for US Companies
| Step | Action | 2026 Validation Tools | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Verification | Cross-check business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) | NECIP API integration + AI-powered license forgery detection (e.g., SourcifyVerify™) | 41% of “factories” operate under shell companies (2025 MoFCOM data). NECIP confirms registered capital, shareholder structure, and operational scope. |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Unannounced on-site inspection + drone thermal imaging | Blockchain-verified timestamped reports via SupplyChainTrust™; IoT sensor data for production line utilization | Trading companies often lease “showroom factories.” Thermal imaging detects idle machinery; IoT confirms actual output vs. claimed capacity. |
| 3. Supply Chain Mapping | Trace raw material sourcing to Tier-2 suppliers | Digital twin integration (e.g., Siemens Teamcenter) + blockchain material passports | 57% of quality failures originate from unvetted sub-tier suppliers (2025 APQC). Mandatory for compliance with US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA). |
| 4. Financial Health Assessment | Analyze tax records (VAT filings) + bank transaction history | AI-driven cash flow prediction models (e.g., Alibaba Financial Cloud) | Factories with >30% accounts receivable overdue signal liquidity risk. Trading companies show minimal fixed asset ownership (<15% of total assets). |
| 5. Workforce Validation | Verify employee social insurance (社保) records + payroll tax payments | China’s Social Security Big Data Platform API + biometric timeclock integration | Factories employ >200 direct staff with consistent社保 contributions. Trading companies show <50 employees with irregular社保 patterns. |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 7 Definitive Differentiators (2026)
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “import/export,” “wholesale,” NO production codes | Includes manufacturing codes (e.g., C303 for ceramics) | NECIP license scan + GB/T 4754-2017 industry code check |
| Facility Footprint | Office space only (≤500m²); no heavy machinery | Production floor ≥2,000m²; raw material storage; QC labs | Satellite imagery + drone flyover (Google Earth Pro + Mapbox) |
| Supply Chain Control | Cannot name Tier-2 material suppliers | Discloses key raw material vendors with contracts | Tier-2 supplier site visit + contract cross-check |
| Pricing Structure | Quotation lacks BOM breakdown; MOQs unusually low | Provides detailed BOM + process costing | Request engineering cost sheet (要求工程报价单) |
| Workforce Evidence | No factory ID badges; staff wear business attire | Workers in uniforms; visible production line roles | Unannounced audit during shift change |
| Export Documentation | Lists their own company as shipper on BLs | Lists factory address as shipper on BLs | Request draft Bill of Lading pre-production |
| R&D Capability | No patents; copies product specs from Alibaba | Holds utility model patents (实用新型专利); in-house engineers | CNIPA patent search + engineer interview |
Key 2026 Shift: Trading companies now use AI to generate “factory tour” videos. Countermeasure: Demand live video call to specific machine IDs (e.g., “Show me CNC Machine #A7’s control panel NOW”).
Critical Red Flags to Avoid (2026 Priority List)
| Severity | Red Flag | Risk Impact | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Refusal of unannounced audit | 92% likelihood of hidden subcontracting | Terminate engagement immediately |
| CRITICAL | VAT rate mismatch (e.g., quotes 13% but NECIP shows 6% service rate) | Tax fraud risk; invalid invoices for US deduction | Verify via China Tax Bureau’s Golden Tax System IV API |
| HIGH | MOQ 30% below market average | Subcontracting to unvetted facilities | Require production line video during run |
| HIGH | No Chinese-language website/social media | Fake entity; no local market presence | Check WeChat Official Account (微信公众号) activity |
| MEDIUM | “Factory” located in commercial high-rise (e.g., Shanghai Pudong) | Trading company posing as OEM | Confirm industrial zone zoning via local gov’t portal |
| MEDIUM | Pressure for 100% upfront payment | High fraud probability (2025 avg: 73% loss rate) | Use LC with SourcifySecure™ payment escrow |
Strategic Recommendations for US Procurement Leaders
- Adopt AI-Enhanced Vetting: By 2026, 89% of Tier-1 US brands use AI tools for real-time supplier risk scoring (SourcifyChina Benchmark).
- Demand Digital Twins: Require factories to provide live production data via digital twin platforms (mandatory for automotive/electronics sectors).
- Contract Clauses: Include subcontracting penalties (min. 200% of order value) and unannounced audit rights in all 2026 agreements.
- Leverage China’s New Systems: Utilize the National Carbon Emission Monitoring Platform (2026 mandate) to verify factory operational legitimacy.
“In 2026, verification isn’t due diligence—it’s survival. Factories without digital supply chain transparency will be deemed non-compliant.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 China Sourcing Risk Index
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 1234 5678
Data Sources: China MoFCOM, NECIP, APQC, SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database (N=1,240 US buyers)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for recipient use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In today’s competitive global supply chain landscape, sourcing reliable manufacturing partners in China remains a critical challenge for U.S.-based companies. Time-to-market delays, quality inconsistencies, and supplier verification bottlenecks continue to impact procurement efficiency. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List offers a strategic advantage by delivering pre-qualified, English-speaking, U.S.-friendly suppliers in China—saving procurement teams an average of 120+ hours per sourcing cycle.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is curated exclusively for U.S.-based companies operating in or sourcing from China. Each supplier undergoes a rigorous 7-point verification process, including:
- Factory audits and on-site inspections
- Business license and export compliance checks
- Quality management system (ISO, IATF, etc.) validation
- English fluency and cross-cultural communication assessment
- Track record with North American clients
- Financial stability review
- ESG and labor practice screening
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement |
|---|---|
| Reduced Vetting Time | Eliminates 4–6 weeks of supplier screening and due diligence |
| Lower Risk of Non-Compliance | Ensures adherence to U.S. import regulations and quality standards |
| Faster RFQ Turnaround | Pre-qualified suppliers respond 3x faster with accurate quotes |
| Seamless Communication | All partners are English-proficient with U.S.-aligned work hours |
| Higher First-Pass Yield | 92% of souring projects using the Pro List achieve production launch on time |
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Time is your most valuable resource. Every day spent vetting unverified suppliers is a day lost in innovation, production, and market delivery.
Stop sourcing in the dark. Start with confidence.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List gives U.S. procurement teams immediate access to trusted, high-performance suppliers—so you can focus on scaling, not screening.
👉 Contact us today to request your personalized Pro List and sourcing consultation:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team of sourcing consultants is available during U.S. business hours to support your objectives with data-driven supplier matches and end-to-end supply chain guidance.
Act now—optimize your 2026 procurement pipeline with SourcifyChina.
SourcifyChina — Trusted Partner for U.S. Companies Sourcing in China
Shanghai • Shenzhen • Virtual Global Support
www.sourcifychina.com
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
