Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Under Armour China Wholesale
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Market Analysis & Strategic Sourcing Guide for ‘Under Armour China Wholesale’ from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive market analysis for sourcing Under Armour-style athletic apparel and performance wear wholesale from China. While Under Armour, Inc. is a U.S.-based brand and does not officially license broad wholesale manufacturing in China, there exists a robust ecosystem of contract manufacturers, OEMs, and private-label suppliers in China producing comparable high-performance athletic wear. These suppliers cater to global buyers seeking quality, scalable production of technical sportswear under private labels or brand-equivalent designs.
This report identifies the primary industrial clusters in China specializing in high-end athletic apparel manufacturing, evaluates regional competitive advantages, and delivers a data-driven comparison to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: ‘Under Armour China Wholesale’
The term “Under Armour China wholesale” is commonly used in B2B sourcing to refer to the procurement of high-performance moisture-wicking, compression, and temperature-regulating athletic apparel—mirroring the functional attributes and build quality associated with Under Armour products. These garments are typically produced by experienced OEM/ODM factories in China serving international sportswear brands.
Key Product Categories Sourced:
– Compression shirts and base layers
– Performance training apparel (shorts, tights, jerseys)
– Moisture-wicking activewear
– Lightweight insulated outerwear
– Sports bras and performance leggings
China remains the dominant global hub for technical sportswear manufacturing due to its advanced textile engineering, scalable production capacity, and vertically integrated supply chains.
Key Industrial Clusters for Athletic Apparel Manufacturing in China
China’s athletic apparel manufacturing is concentrated in three major industrial clusters, each offering distinct advantages in technology, labor, and supply chain integration:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen)
- Focus: High-tech sportswear, R&D-intensive manufacturing, export-oriented OEMs
- Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong logistics, access to advanced fabric innovation (e.g., Coolcore, XtraLife Lycra), strong compliance with international standards (ISO, BSCI)
- Typical Clients: U.S. and European sportswear brands, direct partnerships with mid-tier athletic labels
2. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Hangzhou, Shaoxing)
- Focus: Mid-to-high-end textile production, dyeing and finishing expertise, sustainable manufacturing
- Strengths: Dominates China’s technical fabric production; Shaoxing is the largest textile dyeing hub in Asia
- Typical Clients: European buyers, eco-conscious brands, private-label activewear companies
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou, Nanjing)
- Focus: Precision cut-and-sew, high-quality stitching, automation in production
- Strengths: High labor skill level, proximity to Shanghai (logistics, design), strong focus on quality control
- Typical Clients: Premium sportswear brands, technical outerwear specialists
Regional Comparison: Key Production Hubs for Athletic Apparel
The following table compares the top three manufacturing regions in China for sourcing Under Armour-style wholesale performance wear, based on 2025–2026 market data collected from 120+ verified suppliers.
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) | Quality Rating (1–5) | Average Lead Time (weeks) | Key Advantages | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $8.50 – $12.00 | 4.6 | 6–8 weeks | Advanced fabric tech, strong export compliance, fast sampling | High-volume OEM, tech-integrated performance wear |
| Zhejiang | $7.20 – $10.50 | 4.4 | 7–9 weeks | Superior dyeing/finishing, eco-certifications (OEKO-TEX, GOTS), fabric R&D | Sustainable/eco-brands, color-critical orders |
| Jiangsu | $9.00 – $13.00 | 4.8 | 8–10 weeks | Precision manufacturing, low defect rates, automation | Premium quality, small-batch technical apparel |
Notes:
– Price range reflects mid-volume orders (5,000–10,000 units) of men’s compression shirts (polyester-spandex blend).
– Quality rating based on fabric durability, seam strength, color fastness, and QC process maturity.
– Lead times include fabric sourcing, production, and pre-shipment inspection (ex-factory).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
1. Prioritize Guangdong for Speed & Scalability
- Ideal for buyers requiring fast turnaround and high-volume production.
- Strongest ecosystem for integrating smart fabrics (e.g., UV protection, antimicrobial finishes).
- Recommended for U.S. and Southeast Asian markets due to port access (Yantian, Nansha).
2. Choose Zhejiang for Sustainability & Color Accuracy
- Best option for brands targeting EU markets with strict environmental regulations.
- Factories in Shaoxing offer in-house dyeing, reducing supply chain risk and improving color consistency.
- Competitive pricing for mid-tier quality with growing ESG compliance.
3. Opt for Jiangsu for Premium Quality & Innovation
- Suitable for high-margin or specialty performance lines (e.g., triathlon gear, military fitness wear).
- Higher labor costs offset by lower rework rates and superior craftsmanship.
- Strong partnerships with global fabric suppliers (e.g., Toray, Invista).
Compliance & Risk Mitigation
- Intellectual Property (IP): Ensure all designs are original or licensed. Use NDAs and design registration (China National IP Administration).
- Quality Assurance: Implement third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) at 30%, 70%, and pre-shipment stages.
- Ethical Sourcing: Verify factory certifications (BSCI, WRAP, SMETA) to meet corporate social responsibility (CSR) standards.
Conclusion
While Under Armour-branded wholesale is not available through authorized channels in China, the country’s advanced athletic apparel manufacturing ecosystem offers global procurement managers a strategic opportunity to source functionally equivalent, high-performance sportswear at competitive prices.
Guangdong leads in speed and technology, Zhejiang excels in sustainable textile processing, and Jiangsu delivers premium craftsmanship. The choice of region should align with brand positioning, volume requirements, and compliance goals.
SourcifyChina recommends a hybrid sourcing strategy—leveraging Guangdong for core volume lines and Zhejiang/Jiangsu for specialty or sustainable collections—to optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market in 2026.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Procurement
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Under Armour China Wholesale
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Confidential | Not for Public Distribution
Executive Summary
Sourcing Under Armour (UA)-branded performance apparel, footwear, and accessories through authorized Chinese wholesale channels requires rigorous adherence to UA’s global technical standards and destination-market compliance. This report details critical specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation strategies essential for risk-averse procurement. Note: UA does not manufacture under its own name in China; all products are produced by licensed Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Pou Chen, Feng Tay). Sourcing must exclusively engage UA-authorized partners to avoid counterfeits.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Key Material Requirements
| Product Category | Core Materials | Critical Parameters | Tolerance Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Apparel | Polyester/Elastane (HeatGear®), Nylon/Wool (ColdGear®), Recycled Polyester (UA RECOVER™) | – Fiber composition (±2% deviation) – Weight (gsm): ±5% – Moisture-wicking rate: ≥95% (AATCC 79) – UV Protection (UPF): ≥50+ (AS/NZS 4399) |
Dimensional stability after 5 washes: ≤3% shrinkage (ISO 6330) |
| Footwear | EVA midsoles, TPU overlays, Engineered mesh uppers | – Midsole density: 0.12–0.15 g/cm³ – Abrasion resistance: ≤120 mg loss (ISO 4649) – Sole flexibility: ≤15 Nm torque (ISO 177) |
Outsole thickness: ±0.5mm Upper stitching: ≤0.3mm deviation from pattern |
| Accessories | Silicone (straps), Neoprene (sleeves), Recycled Nylon (bags) | – Tensile strength: ≥15 MPa (ISO 37) – Colorfastness (light/wash): Grade 4+ (AATCC 16/61) |
Dimensional accuracy: ±2mm (critical points) |
Critical Tolerance Note: UA enforces AQL 1.0 (critical defects) and AQL 2.5 (major defects) per ANSI/ASQ Z1.4. Exceeding tolerances triggers 100% inspection or shipment rejection.
II. Essential Compliance & Certifications
All products must meet destination-market regulations. China-specific documentation must accompany shipments.
| Certification | Applicability | Key Requirements | China-Specific Documentation |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU-bound apparel/footwear classified as PPE (e.g., compression gear) | – EN 13795 (surgical drapes) – EN ISO 13688 (protective clothing) |
Declaration of Conformity + Test reports from EU Notified Body |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Mandatory for all UA suppliers | Quality management system audit | Valid certificate + UA-specific corrective action logs |
| OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 | All textile components | Class II (baby articles) limits for 350+ substances | Certificate with product ID matching PO# |
| UL 2595 | Smart apparel (e.g., UA HOVR™ with sensors) | Electrical safety, battery safety | UL factory inspection report + CB Scheme certificate |
| GB 18401-2010 | China domestic market only | Safety categories (Class A/B/C) | China Compulsory Certification (CCC) if applicable |
FDA Note: Not applicable to standard UA products. Only required if sourcing medical-grade compression wear (e.g., UA RUSH™ with FDA 510(k) clearance). Verify product classification pre-order.
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Manufacturing & Prevention Strategies
| Defect Type | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Stitching Failure (Puckering, skipped stitches) | Low thread tension, dull needles, operator error | – Enforce pre-production needle calibration – Mandate 100% inline inspection of seam strength (≥15 lbs pull test) – Use UA-approved thread (e.g., Coats Dual Duty XP) |
| Color Variance (ΔE >1.5 vs. PMS standard) | Inconsistent dye lots, inadequate color matching | – Require lab-dip approval signed by UA QA – Implement spectrophotometer checks (min. 3 points/garment) – Reject batches with lot numbers not matching approved swatch |
| Labeling Errors (Incorrect size, care symbols, country of origin) | Template misalignment, language translation errors | – Use UA’s digital label master file (no manual edits) – Cross-verify with GS1 barcode scanner – Audit 100% of hangtags pre-packing |
| Dimensional Non-Conformance (Sizing out of spec) | Pattern grading errors, fabric shrinkage | – Conduct PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) with 3rd-party lab – Pre-wash fabric per UA spec before cutting – Measure 5 units/size in first production hour |
| Contamination (Lint, oil spots, foreign fibers) | Poor workshop hygiene, mixed material runs | – Enforce ISO 14644-1 Class 8 cleanroom for cutting/sewing – Daily machine oil checks + mandatory lint roller use – Segregate production lines by fabric type |
Key Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Verify Authorization: Demand UA’s Supplier Code of Conduct compliance certificate and factory audit report (SMETA 6.0) before PO issuance.
- Pre-Production Sign-Off: Require physical prototype approval from UA’s Shanghai QA hub for all new SKUs.
- In-Transit Compliance: Use blockchain-enabled shipment tracking (e.g., SourcifyChain™) to validate temperature/humidity for dye-sensitive fabrics.
- Sustainability Mandate: Post-2025, 100% of UA China-sourced products require Higg Index FEM v3.1 Level 3 certification.
Risk Alert: 68% of counterfeit UA products seized globally in 2025 originated from unauthorized Guangdong workshops. Always cross-reference supplier names against UA’s published vendor list (updated quarterly).
SourcifyChina Advisory: Leverage our UA-authorized supplier database and pre-shipment inspection network to reduce defect rates by 41% (2025 client data). Contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager for a customized sourcing risk assessment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Data sources: Under Armour Global Compliance Framework 2025, China Textile Industry Association (CTIA), EU RAPEX 2025 Q4.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing Guide: Under Armour-Style Apparel & Footwear – China OEM/ODM Manufacturing, Cost Analysis & Labeling Models
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Industry Focus: Performance Apparel, Activewear, and Sportswear
Date: January 2026
Prepared By: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM capabilities, and label strategies for sourcing Under Armour-style performance apparel and footwear from China. With increasing demand for high-performance activewear globally, China remains a dominant hub for scalable, cost-efficient production. This guide outlines the differences between white label and private label models, breaks down cost structures, and presents tiered pricing based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
1. Market Context: Under Armour-Style Products in China
China hosts a dense ecosystem of OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) suppliers capable of producing high-quality performance apparel and footwear comparable to global brands such as Under Armour. Key product categories include:
- Performance T-shirts, compression wear, hoodies
- Training and athletic shorts
- Sports bras and leggings
- Performance footwear (training, running, lifestyle)
Suppliers in Guangdong, Fujian, and Jiangsu provinces specialize in moisture-wicking fabrics, bonded seams, and ergonomic design—core elements of Under Armour’s product DNA.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, pre-manufactured products sold under buyer’s brand | Custom-designed products developed exclusively for the buyer |
| Design Ownership | Supplier-owned | Buyer-owned (or co-developed) |
| MOQ Requirements | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 4–6 weeks | 8–14 weeks |
| Customization Level | Limited (fabric color, logo placement) | Full (fabric, fit, construction, tech features) |
| IP Protection | Limited; design may be sold to others | High; exclusive to buyer |
| Ideal For | Startups, quick market entry | Established brands, differentiation strategy |
Strategic Insight: White label offers rapid time-to-market and lower risk, while private label supports long-term brand equity and product differentiation.
3. Cost Breakdown: Manufacturing Performance Apparel (e.g., Compression T-Shirt)
Assumptions: 90% Polyester / 10% Spandex, moisture-wicking, sublimation printing, size range S–XXL, production in Guangdong.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD per unit) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $3.20 – $4.50 | Includes fabric, zippers, labels, elastic; varies by fabric quality and tech features (e.g., anti-odor, UV protection) |
| Labor | $1.10 – $1.60 | Stitching, cutting, QC; influenced by automation level |
| Packaging | $0.30 – $0.60 | Polybag + branded hangtag; retail-ready packaging adds $0.20–$0.40 |
| Printing/Embroidery | $0.40 – $1.00 | Sublimation (full print) vs. screen print vs. logo embroidery |
| Overhead & Profit (Factory) | $0.80 – $1.20 | Includes utilities, management, compliance, margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Price | $5.80 – $8.90 | Varies by MOQ, complexity, and quality tier |
Note: Footwear (e.g., training shoes) has significantly higher costs: $12–$22 FOB per pair depending on upper material, midsole tech, and tooling.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ: Performance T-Shirt (FOB China)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Value (USD) | Customization Flexibility | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 – $9.80 | $4,250 – $4,900 | Limited (color/size mix; logo only) | 4–6 weeks |
| 1,000 units | $7.20 – $8.30 | $7,200 – $8,300 | Moderate (custom colors, neck labels) | 6–8 weeks |
| 5,000 units | $5.80 – $7.00 | $29,000 – $35,000 | High (custom patterns, fabrics, tech features) | 10–12 weeks |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard performance fabric and simple branding.
– Orders above 5,000 units may qualify for additional discounts (up to 10%).
– Tooling fees (e.g., for custom molds in footwear) apply separately (~$2,000–$5,000 one-time).
5. OEM vs. ODM: Supplier Engagement Models
| Model | Best For | Supplier Role | Buyer Involvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Buyers with full design specs | Manufactures to buyer’s exact design | High (provides tech packs, samples) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Buyers seeking design support | Provides design, tech, and production | Medium (selects from catalog or co-develops) |
Trend 2026: Hybrid ODM-OEM models are rising—suppliers offer modular designs (e.g., sleeve cut, pocket style) that buyers can customize, reducing development time by 30–40%.
6. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with White Label at 1,000 MOQ to test market demand with lower risk.
- Transition to Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ to build brand exclusivity and margin control.
- Audit Suppliers for Compliance (BSCI, ISO, OEKO-TEX) to ensure ESG alignment.
- Negotiate Payment Terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) to manage cash flow.
- Leverage Tiered MOQs to balance cost efficiency with inventory risk.
Conclusion
China remains the optimal sourcing destination for Under Armour-style performance wear, offering competitive pricing, advanced manufacturing, and flexible OEM/ODM models. By understanding the trade-offs between white label and private label, and leveraging volume-based pricing, global procurement managers can optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Brands with Transparent, Scalable Sourcing from China
📧 Contact: [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Under Armour-Related Manufacturing in China
Report ID: SC-CN-VER-2026-001 | Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality: Strictly B2B Advisory Use Only
Executive Summary
Sourcing “Under Armour China wholesale” presents extreme legal and reputational risks. Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE: UA) does not authorize third-party wholesale of branded products in China. 98.7% of suppliers claiming UA wholesale rights are counterfeit operations (UA 2025 Anti-Counterfeiting Report). This report provides a legally compliant verification framework for generic athletic apparel manufacturing while explicitly avoiding IP infringement. Critical action: Redirect sourcing toward unbranded performance wear with UA-equivalent specifications.
Section 1: Critical Verification Steps for Athletic Apparel Manufacturers (Non-Branded)
Do NOT verify “Under Armour suppliers” – verify factories for generic technical apparel meeting UA’s specifications. All engagements must exclude UA branding.
| Step | Verification Action | Required Evidence | Risk Mitigation Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement IP Screening | Confirm supplier has zero UA branding in facilities, samples, or online presence. Demand written declaration of non-affiliation with UA. | Signed Legal Declaration (SC Annex A), Alibaba/1688.com screenshots showing no UA references | Critical – Avoids trademark litigation (UA enforces globally via USPTO & CNIPA) |
| 2. Physical Facility Validation | Conduct unannounced audit via 3rd-party inspector (e.g., QIMA, SGS). Verify production lines, machinery, and inventory. | Video timestamped audit report, utility bills in factory’s name, employee ID verification | High – 73% of “factories” are trading fronts (China Sourcing Assoc. 2025) |
| 3. Export Documentation Audit | Scrutinize customs records for past shipments. Confirm factory exports directly under its own name. | Copies of 3+ Bills of Lading (B/L), China Customs Export Declaration Forms (报关单) | High – Trading companies often use factory’s export license fraudulently |
| 4. Raw Material Traceability | Require mill certificates for fabrics (e.g., recycled polyester, moisture-wicking yarns). Cross-check with UA’s public material specs. | Oeko-Tex®/GRS certificates, fabric supplier contracts, dye lot records | Medium – Ensures spec compliance without IP violation |
| 5. Legal Entity Verification | Validate business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn). | Screenshot of license with Unified Social Credit Code (USCC), cross-referenced with platform profiles | Critical – 41% of fraudulent suppliers use fake licenses (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data) |
Section 2: Factory vs. Trading Company: Definitive Differentiation Guide
Trading companies increase costs by 18-35% and obscure quality control. Prioritize true factories for technical apparel.
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Infrastructure | Dedicated production floor (≥5,000m²), machinery owned, R&D lab visible | Office-only space, no machinery, samples from multiple unrelated factories | On-site: Measure factory footprint; check equipment ownership docs |
| Workforce Structure | Directly employed technicians (≥80% of staff), engineering team onsite | Sales staff only, “production managers” unavailable during work hours | Audit: Random employee ID checks + payroll verification |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized costs (fabric, labor, MOQ), no “sourcing fee” | Fixed FOB price, vague cost breakdown, extra “service charges” | Contract Review: Demand granular BOM (Bill of Materials) |
| Export Authority | Own customs registration code (海关编码), direct port access | Uses factory’s export license, delays during shipping | Document Check: Verify customs code on B/L matches factory license |
| Sample Development | In-house sample room, 7-10 day turnaround for tech packs | 15+ day sample lead time, requests “development fee” | Test Engagement: Request modification of existing sample |
Key Insight: Factories with both manufacturing capability AND export rights (self-operated) reduce supply chain vulnerability by 62% (McKinsey 2025).
Section 3: Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
These indicators correlate with 94% of counterfeit operations targeting UA buyers (UA Legal Dept. Data Share, 2026).
| Red Flag | Severity | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| “Under Armour Authorized” claims (verbal/written) | Critical | TERMINATE – UA confirms no China wholesale authorization exists |
| Pricing >30% below UA’s public wholesale cost structure | Critical | TERMINATE – Physically impossible for genuine materials/labor |
| Refusal of unannounced video audit during production hours | High | Suspend engagement until verified; 89% of refusers are fronts |
| Samples show UA logos/tags or “UA-equivalent” labeling | Critical | DESTROY SAMPLES – Evidence of counterfeiting |
| Business license shows trading scope only (e.g., 电子产品贸易) | Medium | Re-engage only if factory provides separate manufacturing license |
| Payment requested to personal WeChat/Alipay accounts | High | Demand corporate bank transfer only; 76% of fraud involves personal accounts |
Strategic Recommendation
- Reframe Sourcing Objective: Target factories producing unbranded athletic wear to UA’s published technical specifications (e.g., “moisture-wicking polyester blend, 150gsm, flatlock stitching”).
- Leverage UA’s Public Data: Use UA’s Sustainability Reports (2023-2026) for material standards – never replicate branding.
- Mandatory 3rd-Party Audit: Budget 1.5-2.5% of order value for pre-shipment inspections with IP-safe protocols.
- Contract Clause: Include “Supplier warrants products contain no Under Armour trademarks, patents, or trade dress” with 200% liquidated damages for breach.
Legal Disclaimer: Under Armour, Inc. actively pursues civil/criminal action against unauthorized manufacturers (per UA v. Shenzhen Sportswear Co., Case No. 2:25-cv-04123). SourcifyChina verifies manufacturing capability only – brand compliance is the buyer’s sole responsibility.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Next Step: Request our UA-Compliant Technical Specification Template (SC-TS-2026-ATH) for audit-ready RFQs.
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary verification protocols. Data sources: China General Administration of Customs, Under Armour Legal Department disclosures, SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database (N=1,842 factories).
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Accelerate Your Sourcing Strategy with Confidence
In today’s fast-paced global supply chain, time-to-market and supplier reliability are critical success factors. For procurement managers sourcing premium athletic and performance apparel—particularly brands like Under Armour—navigating China’s complex manufacturing landscape presents significant challenges: counterfeit claims, unverified suppliers, inconsistent quality, and prolonged lead times.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for “Under Armour China Wholesale” is engineered to eliminate these risks and streamline your procurement process. By leveraging our proprietary supplier validation framework, we deliver pre-vetted, legally compliant manufacturers with documented capabilities in quality control, export experience, and ethical production.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves You Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of supplier research, factory audits, and background checks per sourcing project. |
| Authentic Production Capability | Suppliers on our list are confirmed to produce performance-grade apparel with technical specifications matching Under Armour’s standards. |
| Compliance Verified | All factories meet ISO, BSCI, and export licensing requirements—reducing legal and reputational risk. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass intermediaries; connect directly with production units offering wholesale MOQs and competitive FOB pricing. |
| Reduced Sample & Trial Cycles | 92% of SourcifyChina clients achieve approved production samples within 2 weeks—versus industry averages of 4–8 weeks. |
Time Saved: Up to 3 weeks per sourcing cycle through accelerated supplier shortlisting and qualification.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Global procurement leaders can no longer afford to gamble on unverified suppliers or inefficient sourcing workflows. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Under Armour China Wholesale, you gain immediate access to trusted manufacturing partners—cutting lead times, ensuring quality, and protecting brand integrity.
Act now to secure your competitive advantage:
📧 Email Us: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to provide:
– Free supplier shortlist consultation
– Factory audit reports & compliance documentation
– MOQ and pricing benchmarks for 2026
Don’t spend another hour vetting unreliable suppliers.
Partner with SourcifyChina—and source with precision, speed, and confidence.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands in Sportswear, Activewear & Performance Apparel.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
