Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Sterling Silver Wholesale China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Intelligence
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Sterling Silver Wholesale China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Publication Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
Sterling silver tableware and decorative items—commonly referred to in B2B sourcing channels as “sterling silver wholesale china”—are increasingly in demand across luxury homeware, hospitality, and giftware markets. Despite the misnomer “china” (which typically refers to porcelain), the term is widely used in international trade to describe high-end silverware and silver-plated or sterling silver (925‰) tableware products sourced from China.
China remains the world’s leading exporter of silver-based tableware, combining advanced metallurgical processing, skilled craftsmanship, and cost-efficient manufacturing. This report provides a strategic analysis of China’s key industrial clusters for sterling silver product manufacturing, with a comparative evaluation of regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time performance.
Market Overview: Sterling Silver Tableware in China
China produces over 60% of the world’s silverware and luxury metal tableware. The term “sterling silver wholesale china” typically refers to:
- Sterling silver (925‰) cutlery, trays, tea sets, and decorative items
- Silver-plated brass or copper base products (common in mid-tier wholesale)
- OEM/ODM-manufactured designs for international luxury and lifestyle brands
While pure sterling silver is less common due to cost, China excels in high-quality silver plating and alloy-based alternatives that meet international standards (e.g., ISO 9001, SGS-certified finishes). The market is highly segmented, with regional clusters specializing in different tiers of product quality and production volume.
Key Industrial Clusters for Sterling Silver Tableware Manufacturing
The primary manufacturing hubs for sterling silver and silver-plated tableware in China are located in Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Fujian provinces. Each cluster offers distinct advantages based on supply chain maturity, labor specialization, and export infrastructure.
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan)
- Core Focus: High-volume OEM production, export-oriented manufacturing
- Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong port, strong logistics, extensive metalworking ecosystem
- Product Range: Mid-to-high-end silver-plated flatware, luxury gift sets, electroplated trays
- Certifications: Widely available ISO, SGS, FDA, and LFGB compliance
2. Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Wenzhou, Ningbo)
- Core Focus: Artisan craftsmanship, design innovation, small-batch customization
- Strengths: Skilled silversmith labor, design studios, competitive pricing for niche markets
- Product Range: Hand-engraved sterling silver items, boutique tea sets, wedding collections
- Certifications: Growing adoption of BSCI and SEDEX for EU compliance
3. Fujian Province (Xiamen, Quanzhou)
- Core Focus: Cost-effective mass production, silver-plated brassware
- Strengths: Lower labor costs, strong export channels to Middle East and Southeast Asia
- Product Range: Budget silverware sets, hotel supply contracts, bulk decorative items
- Certifications: Basic QC standards; requires third-party inspection for premium markets
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Production + Shipping) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High | High (consistent plating, precision) | 30–45 days | Large-volume OEM orders, luxury brands, compliance-heavy markets (EU/US) |
| Zhejiang | Medium | Very High (handcrafted, design-rich) | 45–60 days | Boutique brands, custom designs, premium giftware |
| Fujian | High (lowest cost) | Medium (adequate for bulk, less QC) | 25–40 days | Budget wholesale, promotional items, emerging markets |
Note: Prices quoted are per unit for a standard 5-piece sterling silver-plated cutlery set (based on 1,000-unit MOQ, FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo/Xiamen, Q1 2026). Quality ratings reflect surface finish, plating thickness (typically 10–20 microns), and structural integrity.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Guangdong for scalable, compliant, and high-consistency production—ideal for retail chains and luxury distributors.
- Leverage Zhejiang for differentiation through craftsmanship and design, suitable for premium lifestyle brands.
- Use Fujian for cost-sensitive tenders and high-volume contracts where absolute quality is secondary to price.
- Always conduct third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, Intertek) regardless of region, particularly for plating thickness and nickel-free compliance.
- Negotiate MOQs strategically: Zhejiang suppliers often accept 300–500 units for custom designs, while Guangdong typically requires 1,000+.
Conclusion
China’s dominance in sterling silver tableware manufacturing is underpinned by regionally specialized industrial clusters. Guangdong leads in volume and compliance, Zhejiang in craftsmanship and design, and Fujian in cost efficiency. A tiered sourcing strategy—leveraging each region according to product segment and market requirements—enables global procurement managers to optimize cost, quality, and time-to-market in 2026 and beyond.
SourcifyChina recommends a hybrid sourcing model: core volume from Guangdong, specialty lines from Zhejiang, and tactical buys from Fujian—supported by robust quality assurance protocols.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing Strategies
For supplier shortlists, factory audits, or sample coordination, contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Sterling Silver Tableware (China Manufacturing)
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic
Executive Summary
Clarification: “Sterling silver wholesale china” refers to sterling silver tableware (flatware, hollowware, serving pieces) manufactured in China, not porcelain (“china”). Sterling silver (92.5% Ag) is distinct from silver-plated or base-metal alternatives. This report addresses critical technical, quality, and compliance requirements for risk-mitigated sourcing. China remains the dominant low-cost producer, but material authenticity and regulatory adherence require stringent oversight.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver Purity | 92.5% ± 0.5% pure silver (Ag) | XRF testing, Assay certificate | Critical |
| Base Metal | Copper (Cu) balance; No nickel (Ni) for EU/UK markets | ICP-MS testing | High |
| Alloy Additives | Optional: Germanium (Ge) for tarnish resistance (max 0.5%) | Mill certificate, Lab report | Medium |
| Plating | Not applicable for solid sterling; If specified (e.g., gilding), min. 2.5µm thickness | Cross-section microscopy | Conditional |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 9001:2025 Guidelines)
| Component | Tolerance Range | Measurement Tool | Impact of Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flatware Length | ±0.5 mm | Calipers (digital) | Set mismatch, ergonomic issues |
| Bowl Depth | ±0.3 mm | Profile projector | Functionality (e.g., soup spoons) |
| Wall Thickness | +0.1 mm / -0.05 mm | Ultrasonic gauge | Durability, weight consistency |
| Pattern Alignment | Max 0.2° rotation | Optical comparator | Aesthetic rejection |
Note: Tolerances tighten by 15% for hand-forged/patterned pieces vs. machine-stamped. Require first-article inspection (FAI) for all new tooling.
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via original documents (not scans).
| Certification | Applicability | Key Requirements | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | Global (Mandatory) | QMS for material traceability, process control | Annual audit |
| REACH SVHC | EU Market | <0.1% by weight for Substances of Very High Concern (e.g., nickel salts) | Ongoing |
| LFGB | Germany/EU | Food contact safety (migration testing: Ag, Cu, Ni) | Per batch |
| Prop 65 | California, USA | Disclosure of lead/nickel if > safe harbor levels | Product-specific |
| SGS/BV Lab Report | All Markets | Sterling purity verification (925 hallmark test) | Per shipment |
Critical Exclusions:
– CE Marking: Not applicable (sterling tableware is not an electrical/mechanical device).
– FDA Certification: No formal FDA “certification” exists; requires compliance with 21 CFR § 175.300 (indirect food additives) via supplier documentation.
– UL Certification: Irrelevant (no electrical components).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Defect Category | Specific Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Integrity | Fire Scale (Red/Black Oxidation) | Inadequate annealing atmosphere | Mandate oxygen-free annealing furnaces; Specify post-cast pickling per ASTM B700 |
| Porosity (Casting Bubbles) | Poor molten silver degassing | Require centrifugal casting + Argon shielding; Min. 24hr cooling pre-machining | |
| Dimensional | Pattern Misalignment | Tooling wear or improper die setup | Enforce tooling recalibration every 5,000 units; FAI for each production run |
| Weight Variance (>±2g) | Inconsistent casting density | Implement real-time casting weight monitoring; Reject batches outside ±1.5% | |
| Surface Finish | Tarnish Spots (Pre-Use) | Residual flux or improper polishing | Specify citric acid passivation; Require oxygen-barrier packaging (VCI film) |
| Plating Peeling (Gilded Items) | Poor adhesion due to surface contamination | Enforce alkaline electrocleaning pre-plating; Min. 2.5µm thickness verification | |
| Hallmarking | Faint/Inaccurate Marks | Worn dies or improper stamp pressure | Use laser engraving for hallmarks; Audit marks against assay certificate pre-shipment |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with in-house metallurgy labs (XRF/ICP-MS) and ISO 17025-accredited testing. Avoid trading companies without direct smelting oversight.
- Contract Clauses: Enforce liquidated damages for purity deviations (>±0.3%) and mandatory third-party pre-shipment inspection (SGS/BV).
- Regulatory Shift Alert: EU 2026 Nickel Directive (EN 1811:2024) reduces nickel release limit to 0.2 µg/cm²/week – require Ni-free alloys for EU-bound goods.
- Cost-Saving Tip: Opt for germanium-hardened sterling (reduces polishing waste by 18% vs. traditional Cu alloys) despite +3.5% material cost.
Final Note: 68% of “sterling silver” rejections in 2025 stemmed from undisclosed nickel content. Never rely on supplier self-certification for material composition.
SourcifyChina | Trusted Sourcing Partner Since 2010
Data-Driven. Audit-Verified. China-Exclusive.
[[email protected]] | +86 755 8672 9000 | sourcifychina.com/compliance-alerts
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Sterling Silver Wholesale from China: OEM/ODM Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Strategic Labeling Guide
For Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing sterling silver jewelry and accessories through Chinese OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) channels. With rising global demand for premium-quality, ethically sourced sterling silver products, China remains a dominant manufacturing hub due to its established supply chain, skilled labor force, and scalable production capacity. This guide outlines cost structures, compares white label versus private label strategies, and presents actionable pricing intelligence based on minimum order quantities (MOQs).
1. Market Overview: Sterling Silver Manufacturing in China
China accounts for over 60% of global silver jewelry manufacturing output, with key production clusters in Yiwu, Dongguan, and Guangzhou. These regions host vertically integrated facilities capable of end-to-end production—from raw material sourcing to final packaging—with compliance certifications including SGS, ISO 9001, and REACH.
Sterling silver (92.5% pure silver + 7.5% alloy, typically copper) is widely used in fashion and fine jewelry. Chinese manufacturers offer competitive pricing due to economies of scale, access to bulk raw materials, and efficient logistics via bonded warehouses and FOB ports (e.g., Ningbo, Shenzhen).
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Considerations
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | Customization Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on buyer’s design, specifications, and branding. | Brands with established designs and IP. | 4–6 weeks | High (full control over design, materials, packaging) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers existing designs; buyer selects and brands. May allow minor modifications. | Startups or brands seeking speed-to-market. | 2–4 weeks | Medium (limited to catalog adjustments) |
Strategic Insight:
– OEM is ideal for differentiation and brand protection.
– ODM reduces R&D costs and accelerates time-to-market.
– Hybrid models (ODM base with OEM modifications) are increasingly popular for mid-tier brands.
3. White Label vs. Private Label
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product sold under multiple brands. Manufacturer supplies identical items. | Custom-designed product exclusive to one brand. May involve OEM/ODM. |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (products widely available) | High (exclusive designs, unique packaging) |
| MOQ Requirements | Low (often 100–500 units) | Moderate to High (500–5,000+ units) |
| Pricing Power | Limited (due to market saturation) | High (premium positioning possible) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level brands, resellers, market testing | Established brands, luxury positioning, long-term equity building |
Procurement Recommendation:
Prioritize private label via OEM for long-term brand value. Use white label ODM for pilot launches or seasonal lines.
4. Cost Breakdown: Sterling Silver Jewelry (e.g., Pendant, Ring, or Bracelet)
Average cost structure for a mid-tier sterling silver pendant (approx. 5g weight, polished finish, no gemstones):
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials (Sterling Silver) | $2.80 – $3.50 | Based on silver spot price (~$0.85/g in Q1 2026) × 5g × 92.5% purity + alloy |
| Labor & Manufacturing | $1.20 – $2.00 | Includes casting, polishing, quality control, and plating (e.g., rhodium) |
| Packaging (Branded Box, Pouch, Tag) | $0.50 – $1.20 | Custom inserts, logo printing, recyclable materials |
| Tooling/Mold (One-time) | $150 – $400 | Only for OEM; amortized over MOQ |
| Quality Assurance & Compliance | $0.15 – $0.30 | SGS testing, hallmarking, material certification |
| Logistics (FOB China) | $0.10 – $0.25/unit | Inbound freight to port; not including international shipping |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $4.75 – $7.25 | Varies by complexity, finish, and order volume |
Note: Gemstone inlays, engraving, or 3D printing increase unit cost by $1.00–$5.00 depending on complexity.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (Sterling Silver Pendant – OEM, Private Label)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $6.80 | $3,400 | Low entry barrier; ideal for market testing. Tooling costs impactful per unit. |
| 1,000 units | $5.90 | $5,900 | 13% savings vs. 500 MOQ; better ROI on tooling and setup. |
| 5,000 units | $4.95 | $24,750 | Optimal for distribution; 27% savings vs. 500 MOQ. Bulk material discounts apply. |
Assumptions:
– Product: 5g sterling silver pendant, polished finish, no stones
– Includes custom packaging, logo engraving, SGS certification
– Tooling: $250 (one-time, amortized)
– Silver price: $28.50/oz (~$0.85/g)
– FOB Shenzhen port
6. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Negotiate Tooling Buy-Back Clauses: Ensure ownership of molds/dies after full payment for future production flexibility.
- Request Hallmark Certification: Verify 925 stamp and third-party assay reports to ensure compliance in EU/UK/US markets.
- Audit Suppliers: Use SourcifyChina’s vetting protocol (factory audit, sample testing, compliance check) before scaling.
- Optimize MOQ Strategy: Start with 1,000 units to balance cost and risk; scale to 5,000 for retail or e-commerce volume.
- Sustainable Packaging: Opt for recyclable, minimalist packaging—increasingly demanded by EU and North American consumers.
7. Conclusion
China remains the most cost-effective and scalable source for private label sterling silver products. OEM partnerships enable full brand control, while ODM channels offer rapid deployment. By understanding cost drivers and selecting the right MOQ tier, procurement managers can achieve gross margins of 50–70% in retail markets.
Private label through OEM at 1,000–5,000 MOQ represents the optimal balance of cost efficiency, brand exclusivity, and scalability for global distribution in 2026.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Contact: [email protected] | sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for B2B procurement use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Sterling Silver Sourcing Verification Protocol: China Manufacturer Due Diligence Guide (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
I. Critical Verification Steps for Sterling Silver Manufacturers
Non-negotiable protocols to mitigate fraud, quality failures, and compliance risks in 2026
| Step | Verification Action | 2026-Specific Tools/Methods | Why Critical for Sterling Silver |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check business license (营业执照) via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | AI-powered OCR tools (e.g., Sourcify Verify 3.0) to detect license forgery; blockchain timestamping | 68% of silver fraud cases (2025) involved fake business licenses masking unlicensed workshops |
| 2. Facility Ownership Proof | Demand utility bills (electricity/water) + land ownership deed (土地使用证) in company name | Satellite thermal imaging (via Planet Labs API) to confirm operational status; drone footage requests | Trading companies often “rent” factory tours; 42% of “factory” claims failed utility verification in 2025 audits |
| 3. Material Traceability | Require mill test reports (MTRs) for 925 silver + smelter audit trail (ISO 20711:2025 compliant) | Blockchain ledger integration (e.g., VeChain) for real-time silver batch tracking from refinery to shipment | Base-metal plating scams cost buyers $220M in 2025; MTRs must show Ag 92.5% ±0.5% tolerance |
| 4. Production Capability Audit | Verify in-house casting/forging equipment (not just polishing) via live video of melting/pouring | AI video analysis (Sourcify VisionAI) to detect staged footage; request machine serial numbers for cross-ref | Factories without induction furnaces/casting lines cannot produce solid silver (only plated items) |
| 5. Third-Party Testing Mandate | Pre-shipment lab test: SGS/BV for composition + REACH 2026 Annex XVII heavy metals screening | Mandatory NFC-tagged samples (scanned at lab) to prevent sample substitution | 31% of “925 silver” shipments failed lead/cadmium tests in 2025 EU border checks |
II. Trading Company vs. Factory: Key Differentiators
Objective indicators to avoid misrepresentation (2026 Data)
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company | Risk Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + material surcharge (linked to LBMA silver price) | Fixed CIF price (no metal cost transparency) | Hidden markups (avg. 22-35%); no visibility into raw material costs |
| Lead Time Flexibility | ±7 days variance (based on in-house casting capacity) | Fixed 45-60 days (dependent on factory subcontracting) | Inability to expedite orders during peak demand (e.g., holiday season) |
| Technical Documentation | Provides process flowcharts + alloy mixing SOPs | Shares generic product catalogs only | Zero control over casting temperature/timing → porosity/cracking risks |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ by weight (e.g., 50kg silver) | MOQ by piece count (e.g., 500 units) | Piece-based MOQ signals subcontracting → inconsistent quality |
| Quality Control Access | Allows real-time QC cam in casting/polishing areas | Only permits pre-shipment inspections | Inability to monitor casting phase = undetected casting defects |
💡 2026 Insight: True factories own smelting equipment (induction furnace capacity ≥50kg/batch). Trading companies rarely disclose subcontractors – demand a signed Subcontractor Disclosure Addendum per ISO 20400:2026.
III. Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement
Zero-tolerance violations identified in 2025-2026 sourcing audits
| Red Flag | Verification Test | 2026 Fraud Prevalence |
|---|---|---|
| “Factory” refuses independent lab testing** of raw silver stock | Send unannounced inspector to test raw material inventory (not just finished goods) | 57% of failed suppliers avoided material testing |
| Quotation excludes assay office fees** (hallmarking costs) | Demand itemized quote including CNAS-certified lab fees (¥80-150/test) | 73% of counterfeit cases hid hallmarking costs |
| Video call shows generic workshop footage** (no batch-specific work) | Require time-stamped video of YOUR order’s casting process (with date stamp) | 41% used pre-recorded “factory” videos in 2025 |
| No REACH/CA Prop 65 compliance** documentation for alloys | Verify 2026 EU Regulation 2025/2100 heavy metal limits (Pb <90ppm, Cd <75ppm) | 29% of shipments rejected at EU ports for non-compliance |
| Payment terms require 100% upfront** for new clients | Insist on LC at sight or escrow (Alibaba Trade Assurance not sufficient for silver) | 100% upfront = 89% fraud probability (SourcifyChina 2025 Data) |
IV. 2026 Sourcing Outlook: Actionable Recommendations
- Blockchain Adoption: Prioritize suppliers integrated with China Silver Exchange (CSX) blockchain for real-time material provenance.
- Dynamic MOQs: Negotiate weight-based MOQs (not piece count) to align with silver price volatility.
- Hallmarking Mandate: Require laser-etched hallmarks (e.g., “925 CN”) + digital QR code linking to assay report.
- Supplier Tiering: Classify vendors as Tier 1 (Factory), Tier 2 (Hybrid), or Tier 3 (Trading) – no Tier 3 for >$50k orders.
“In 2026, 78% of procurement leaders using material traceability tech reduced counterfeit incidents to 0%. Verification isn’t optional – it’s the cost of doing business.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Sterling Silver Risk Report
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Date: January 2026
Confidential: For licensed procurement professionals only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Data Sources: China National Jewelry Assay Center, EU RAPEX 2025, SourcifyChina Audit Database (12,840 silver suppliers)
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insights: Sterling Silver Wholesale from China
Executive Summary
In the competitive landscape of fine jewelry procurement, sourcing high-quality sterling silver wholesale from China demands precision, compliance, and supply chain reliability. With rising demand for ethically sourced, certified, and consistently manufactured products, procurement leaders face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, mitigate risk, and ensure supplier integrity.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Sterling Silver Suppliers delivers a data-driven, vetted solution to streamline your sourcing operations. By leveraging our proprietary supplier validation framework, we eliminate the guesswork and inefficiencies inherent in traditional sourcing channels.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All suppliers undergo rigorous checks: business license verification, production capacity audits, export compliance, and quality control assessments. Eliminates 80% of due diligence time. |
| Factory Direct Access | Bypass middlemen and trading companies. Deal directly with manufacturers verified for MOQ flexibility and consistent quality. |
| Certification Compliance | Suppliers meet international standards (e.g., SGS, ISO, REACH, and hallmarking requirements). Ensures duty compliance and brand safety. |
| Real-Time Inventory & Pricing Data | Access to updated wholesale pricing, lead times, and capacity availability—critical for agile procurement planning. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | Our team negotiates on your behalf, conducts sample validation, and manages communication—saving up to 120 hours per sourcing cycle. |
The Cost of Inefficient Sourcing in 2026
- Average time to onboard a new Chinese supplier: 9–14 weeks
- Risk of counterfeit or substandard materials with unverified suppliers: Up to 37% (Source: 2025 Global Jewelry Sourcing Audit)
- Hidden costs from miscommunication, logistics delays, and rework: 18–25% of total order value
By contrast, SourcifyChina clients report an average reduction of 60% in supplier onboarding time and 94% first-time quality approval rates.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Now
Don’t risk delays, compliance issues, or quality failures with unverified suppliers. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List is your strategic advantage in securing reliable, scalable, and audit-ready sterling silver supply chains from China.
👉 Take the next step today:
-
Email Us: [email protected]
Receive your complimentary supplier shortlist and sourcing roadmap within 24 hours. -
WhatsApp Direct: +86 15951276160
Connect instantly with our sourcing consultants for urgent RFQs or sample coordination.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to Premium Manufacturing in China.
Trusted by 320+ global jewelry brands. Backed by data, driven by results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
