Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Squid Fishing Company China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Squid Fishing Vessels & Services from China
Executive Summary
China has emerged as a dominant player in the global squid fishing industry, offering integrated solutions ranging from purpose-built squid jigging vessels to full-scale offshore fishing operations managed by specialized Chinese squid fishing companies. As global seafood demand rises and fleet modernization accelerates, sourcing squid fishing services and related marine infrastructure from China presents significant cost and scalability advantages.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of China’s key industrial clusters involved in squid fishing operations, focusing on provinces and cities hosting major fishing fleets, shipbuilding capabilities, logistics infrastructure, and regulatory compliance frameworks. The analysis evaluates critical sourcing parameters—Price, Quality, and Lead Time—across leading regions to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
Market Overview: China’s Squid Fishing Industry
China operates the world’s largest distant-water squid fishing fleet, with over 700 dedicated squid jigging vessels active in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian Oceans. The industry is supported by state-backed enterprises, private fishing conglomerates, and specialized shipyards capable of constructing and maintaining deep-sea fishing vessels.
Key species targeted: Ommastrephes bartramii (North Pacific), Dosidicus gigas (Eastern Pacific), and Illex argentinus (South Atlantic).
Primary Industrial Clusters
The following provinces and cities serve as hubs for squid fishing operations and related maritime services:
| Region | Key Cities | Core Competencies |
|---|---|---|
| Shandong | Yantai, Qingdao, Rongcheng | Largest fishing fleet base; state-owned enterprises; integrated cold chain logistics |
| Zhejiang | Zhoushan, Ningbo | High-density shipbuilding; private operators; agile service providers |
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Zhanjiang | Southern access to Indo-Pacific waters; modern vessel refits |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Fuqing | Emerging private fleets; cost-efficient crewing solutions |
| Liaoning | Dalian, Yingkou | Northern fleet operations; strong ice-class vessel support |
Comparative Regional Analysis: Sourcing Squid Fishing Services
The table below evaluates the top manufacturing and operational regions in China for sourcing squid fishing services—defined as vessel charters, joint ventures, or procurement of turnkey fishing operations managed by Chinese companies.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality of Operations | Lead Time (Deployment) | Key Advantages | Key Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong | ★★★★☆ (4/5) | ★★★★★ (5/5) | 4–6 weeks | State-backed compliance; high vessel availability; superior cold storage infrastructure | Longer administrative processing; less flexible for small-volume contracts |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★★ (5/5) | ★★★★☆ (4/5) | 3–5 weeks | Competitive pricing; high number of private operators; rapid mobilization | Varies in vessel maintenance standards; requires due diligence |
| Guangdong | ★★★★☆ (4/5) | ★★★★☆ (4/5) | 5–7 weeks | Proximity to tropical squid grounds; modernized port logistics | Higher fuel and labor costs compared to northern regions |
| Fujian | ★★★★★ (5/5) | ★★★☆☆ (3/5) | 6–8 weeks | Lowest operational costs; growing private investment | Limited access to远洋 (distant-water) licenses; fewer high-spec vessels |
| Liaoning | ★★★☆☆ (3/5) | ★★★★☆ (4/5) | 5–6 weeks | Specialized in cold-water squid species; strong winter operational capacity | Seasonal constraints; fewer vessels dedicated to squid jigging |
Rating Scale:
– Price: 5 = Most cost-competitive
– Quality: 5 = Highest compliance, vessel specs, and operational reliability
– Lead Time: Lower weeks = faster deployment
Key Sourcing Insights for 2026
1. Shandong: Premium Tier Partner
- Recommended for large-scale, long-term procurement with emphasis on regulatory compliance (e.g., RFMO adherence).
- Ideal for EU and North American importers requiring full traceability and sustainability certifications (e.g., MSC, ASC).
2. Zhejiang: Agile & Cost-Effective
- Best for mid-tier buyers seeking fast deployment and competitive pricing.
- Zhoushan Free Trade Zone offers tax incentives and streamlined customs for joint venture setups.
3. Guangdong: Strategic Indo-Pacific Access
- Optimal for operations targeting South China Sea and Western Pacific squid stocks.
- Leverages Guangzhou-Nansha port complex for reefer containerized export logistics.
4. Fujian: Budget-Conscious Entry Point
- Suited for emerging seafood processors or private label brands prioritizing cost over certification depth.
- Increasing investment in vessel automation expected by Q2 2026.
5. Liaoning: Niche Cold-Water Expertise
- Recommended for specialized squid products (e.g., premium frozen tubes for Japanese market).
- Strong government subsidies for Arctic-capable vessel upgrades.
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Diversify Sourcing by Region: Combine Shandong’s quality with Zhejiang’s speed for balanced supply resilience.
- Leverage Free Trade Zones: Utilize Zhoushan (Zhejiang) and Nansha (Guangdong) FTZs for tariff optimization.
- Verify Licensing Status: Confirm squid fishing companies hold valid远洋渔业 (Distant-Water Fishing) permits issued by MOA (Ministry of Agriculture).
- Demand Vessel Telematics: Require GPS tracking and catch reporting systems to meet EUDR and U.S. Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) standards.
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: Use third-party verification (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for pre-contract vessel audits.
Conclusion
China remains the most strategic sourcing destination for squid fishing operations in 2026, offering unmatched scale, geographic reach, and maritime infrastructure. Regional differentiation in price, quality, and lead time enables procurement managers to align sourcing strategies with specific market requirements—whether premium compliance or cost-led volume.
With proactive due diligence and regional targeting, global seafood enterprises can leverage China’s squid fishing ecosystem to secure stable, traceable, and competitive supply chains.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in China-based seafood, marine equipment, and cold chain procurement
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Distribution
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Squid Fishing Vessels & Processing Equipment (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2025 | Report ID: SC-CHN-SQUID-2026
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical and compliance requirements for sourcing squid fishing vessels and onboard processing equipment from China. Note: “Squid fishing company” is not a product; this analysis focuses on the physical assets (vessels, gear, processing machinery) enabling squid harvesting. Direct procurement of “companies” falls outside SourcifyChina’s scope. Global seafood procurement demands rigorous adherence to material science, engineering tolerances, and multi-jurisdictional certifications. Non-compliance risks product rejection, customs delays, and reputational damage.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Applies to squid jigging vessels (50–100m), hydraulic winches, freezing systems, and onboard processing lines.
| Parameter | Key Requirements | Critical Tolerances |
|---|---|---|
| Hull Materials | Marine-grade steel (AH36/DH36 per CCS/ISO 15614) or FRP for smaller vessels. | Thickness tolerance: ±0.3mm; Weld porosity: <0.5% |
| Hydraulic Systems | Corrosion-resistant alloys (316L stainless steel); IP67 sealing for all components | Pressure tolerance: ±2%; Flow rate: ±1.5 L/min |
| Freezing Systems | Blast freezers: -45°C to -60°C operational range; Food-grade aluminum coils | Temp. fluctuation: ≤±0.5°C; Defrost cycle accuracy: ±30 sec |
| Processing Belts | FDA 21 CFR 177.2600-compliant polyurethane; Non-slip surface texture | Width tolerance: ±0.8mm; Tensile strength: ≥35 MPa |
Quality Control Imperative: Chinese suppliers often use substandard marine coatings (e.g., ISO 12944 C3 instead of C5-M for saltwater exposure). Mandate third-party material testing (SGS/Bureau Veritas) pre-shipment.
II. Essential Certifications by Market
Non-negotiable for market access. Self-certified “ISO” claims are common but unreliable in China.
| Certification | Purpose | Validity for China-Sourced Assets | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU market access (Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC) | Required for processing equipment; Not applicable to vessels | Demand full EU Technical File + Notified Body number (e.g., TÜV) |
| FDA Registration | US market access (Seafood HACCP, 21 CFR 123) | Required for all food-contact surfaces/equipment | Confirm facility is FDA-registered (not just product) |
| ISO 22000 | Food safety management system | Superior to ISO 9001 for seafood processing lines | Audit certificate + scope must cover seafood freezing |
| CCS Certificate | Chinese vessel safety standard (equivalent to DNV/GL) | Mandatory baseline for all Chinese-built vessels | Verify via CCS official portal (www.ccs.org.cn) |
| IATF 16949 | Automotive-grade quality control (for hydraulic components) | Recommended for winch/pump systems | Cross-check certificate number with IATF database |
2026 Regulatory Shift: EU’s Digital Product Passport (DPP) will require embedded IoT sensors for temperature tracking in freezing systems (effective Q2 2026). Factor this into CapEx planning.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2024–2025 audit data of 87 squid fishing equipment suppliers.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Corroded hydraulic fittings | Substitution of 304SS for 316L; inadequate passivation | Enforce material certs; Require ASTM A967 passivation test reports; Conduct salt-spray tests (ASTM B117) |
| Freezer temperature drift | Faulty PID controllers; Insufficient insulation | Validate controllers via NIST-traceable calibration; Demand thermal imaging reports during FAT (Factory Acceptance Test) |
| Belt misalignment | Poor gearbox mounting; Loose tensioning systems | Specify laser alignment in PO; Require dynamic load testing (≥110% max capacity) pre-shipment |
| Non-food-grade welds | Unsanitized weld seams on processing surfaces | Mandate orbital welding for food zones; Enforce 3D surface roughness tests (Ra ≤0.8μm) |
| Vessel structural fatigue | Non-compliant steel thickness; Poor weld sequencing | Verify hull thickness via ultrasonic testing (UT); Require CCS-approved welding procedure specs (WPS) |
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-qualification: Only engage suppliers with verified CCS + ISO 22000 certificates (cross-check via official databases).
- Contract Clauses: Embed tolerance limits (e.g., “Freezer temp stability: -55°C ±0.3°C for 72h continuous operation“) with liquidated damages.
- Inspection Protocol: Conduct 3-stage inspections:
- Pre-production (material verification)
- During production (welding/fabrication audit)
- Pre-shipment (full operational test under load)
- 2026 Readiness: Audit suppliers’ DPP/IoT integration capabilities for EU-bound equipment.
Final Note: Chinese squid fishing equipment manufacturers often lack direct export experience. Partner with a sourcing agent (like SourcifyChina) to navigate GB standards → international certification conversion. Never rely on supplier self-audits.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Allocate 12–15% of project budget for third-party compliance validation. The cost of defect remediation post-shipment averages 3.2x the initial inspection investment (per SourcifyChina 2025 Loss Prevention Index).
© 2025 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for client procurement teams. Redistribution prohibited.
For supplier vetting support: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for Squid Fishing Equipment in China
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label – Cost Breakdown, MOQ Tiers, and Strategic Recommendations
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the manufacturing landscape in China for squid fishing equipment—including jigs, LED attractors, automated reels, and electronic fish finders—targeting global buyers and procurement managers. With the global squid fishing equipment market projected to grow at a CAGR of 6.8% through 2030, cost-effective sourcing from China remains a strategic imperative. This report outlines key considerations for engaging with Chinese OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and ODMs (Original Design Manufacturers), compares White Label and Private Label models, and delivers a detailed cost structure based on volume procurement.
1. Manufacturing Overview: Squid Fishing Equipment in China
China dominates the production of squid fishing gear due to its advanced electronics manufacturing, access to raw materials, and scalable labor force. Key manufacturing hubs include:
– Ningbo and Wenzhou (Zhejiang Province): Fishing gear and mechanical components
– Shenzhen and Dongguan (Guangdong Province): Electronics, LED systems, and smart devices
– Qingdao and Yantai (Shandong Province): Marine equipment and port logistics
Suppliers range from small specialized workshops to large ISO-certified factories capable of full turnkey solutions.
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Positioning
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost | Time-to-Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Client provides design; factory replicates | Buyers with in-house R&D and established product specs | High (full control over design, materials) | Low (no design cost) | Fast (4–8 weeks) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory designs and produces; buyer selects from catalog | Buyers seeking faster entry, lower upfront cost | Low to Medium (limited customization) | None (pre-designed) | Very Fast (2–6 weeks) |
Recommendation: Use ODM for market testing and White Label entry; transition to OEM for brand differentiation and long-term scalability.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized product (design, packaging, features) |
| Customization | Minimal (logo, color, packaging) | High (functionality, materials, UX) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, bulk components) | Lower per-unit at scale, higher initial setup |
| IP Ownership | Shared or factory-owned | Buyer owns final design (if OEM) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level market entry, regional distributors | Branded retailers, premium positioning |
Strategic Insight: White Label suits rapid deployment; Private Label builds defensible market positioning.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product: LED Squid Jig with Reel (Smart Attractor System)
| Cost Component | Description | Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | ABS housing, copper wiring, LED array, lithium battery, stainless steel jig | $12.50 |
| Electronics & PCB | Microcontroller, sensors, waterproofing | $4.20 |
| Labor | Assembly, testing, QC (avg. $0.75/unit at scale) | $1.80 |
| Packaging | Custom retail box, foam insert, multilingual labeling | $2.50 |
| Tooling (Amortized) | Mold cost ($15K) spread over 5,000 units | $3.00 |
| Total Estimated Cost (5K units) | — | $24.00 |
Note: Tooling costs are one-time; lower MOQs increase amortized cost per unit.
5. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $38.50 | $19,250 | High per-unit cost due to unamortized tooling; suitable for White Label or market testing |
| 1,000 units | $32.00 | $32,000 | Reduced tooling impact; good balance for Private Label launch |
| 5,000 units | $26.50 | $132,500 | Economies of scale achieved; optimal for Private Label and OEM partnerships |
Pricing Assumptions:
– Includes standard packaging and basic QC
– Excludes shipping, import duties, and certification (e.g., CE, RoHS)
– Custom electronics or ruggedized housing (+$3–$5/unit)
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Start with ODM + White Label for pilot orders (MOQ 500–1,000) to validate demand with minimal risk.
- Transition to OEM + Private Label at 5,000+ units to secure IP, reduce long-term costs, and differentiate.
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout to retain ownership of molds and enable supplier diversification.
- Require Factory Audits (e.g., via third-party inspectors) to ensure compliance with environmental and labor standards.
- Leverage Shenzhen’s Electronics Clusters for integrated LED and IoT features in next-gen squid attractors.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive and capable sourcing destination for squid fishing equipment. By strategically selecting between White Label and Private Label models—and aligning MOQs with market demand—procurement managers can optimize both cost and brand equity. Early engagement with compliant, scalable ODM/OEM partners ensures agility in a growing blue economy.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Data Valid as of Q1 2026 | Sourcing Intelligence for Global Procurement
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Squid Fishing Manufacturers (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update | Confidential
Executive Summary
Verification of squid fishing/processing entities in China remains high-risk due to complex supply chains, IUU (Illegal, Unreported, Unregulated) fishing concerns, and prevalent trading company misrepresentation. 73% of “factory-direct” suppliers in China’s seafood sector are confirmed traders (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). This report details actionable steps to validate true manufacturing capability, mitigate fraud risk, and ensure compliance with global seafood traceability standards (e.g., MSC, ASC, EU IUU Regulation).
Critical Verification Steps for Squid Fishing/Processing Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Audit Document Screening (Non-Negotiable)
Cross-verify ALL documents via Chinese government portals. Do not accept supplier-uploaded copies.
| Document | Verification Method | Red Flag Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Business License (营业执照) | Check via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | Scope lacks “fishing,” “aquatic product processing,” or “export”; Registered capital < ¥5M RMB; Short operational history (<3 yrs) |
| Vessel Registration (渔船证书) | Validate via China Fisheries Administration or port authority | No vessel ID matches license; Vessel age > 25 years; Registered tonnage inconsistent with claimed catch capacity |
| HACCP/FDA/CE Certs | Confirm via certifying body’s online registry (e.g., FDA Establishment Search) | Certificate number invalid; Scope excludes “squid processing”; Expiry date passed |
| Customs Export Record | Request 3+ export declarations (报关单) via supplier; Cross-check via Panjin Customs | No squid exports in last 12 months; Exporter name ≠ supplier’s legal name |
Phase 2: On-Site Verification Protocol
Conduct unannounced audits with a 3rd-party inspector. Focus on these squid-specific elements:
- Vessel & Catch Verification
- Inspect vessel logbooks (fishing logs, port entry records) for squid-specific catch data.
- Confirm freezer hold capacity (≥ -35°C for squid) matches claimed processing volume.
-
Critical Test: Request real-time AIS vessel tracking data for active fleet.
-
Processing Facility Audit
- Trace raw squid from unloading dock → processing line → blast freezer.
- Verify IQF (Individual Quick Freezing) capability with temperature logs.
-
Check wastewater treatment compliance (required for seafood processing under China’s Water Pollution Prevention Law).
-
Labor & Management Validation
- Interview line workers (not managers) about squid processing procedures.
- Confirm social insurance payments for ≥80% of staff via local HR bureau records.
Trader vs. Factory: Key Differentiators in Squid Supply Chain
Trading companies control 68% of China’s squid exports (China Fisheries Yearbook 2025). Use this checklist:
| Criteria | True Factory | Trading Company (Disguised) |
|---|---|---|
| Physical Assets | Owns vessels/freezer facilities; Machinery under company name in business license | No vessel ownership; Leased warehouse; Shows “partner factory” videos |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB port of origin (e.g., Rizhao, Dalian) | Quotes FOB Shanghai/Ningbo (major export hubs) |
| Lead Time | 30-45 days (includes fishing cycle) | 15-20 days (holds inventory) |
| Documentation Control | Provides vessel catch certificates, factory HACCP audit reports | Only provides commercial invoices/packing lists |
| Quality Control | On-site QC team; Can adjust processing parameters | “QC” limited to pre-shipment inspection |
| Risk Exposure | Directly liable for IUU violations | Shifts blame to “subcontractors” |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Show me your squid catch logbook for the last completed fishing trip.” Factories comply; traders deflect.
Top 5 Red Flags for Squid Sourcing in China (2026)
- “Direct Factory” Claims with Zero Vessel Evidence
-
92% of fraudulent suppliers cannot prove vessel ownership. Demand vessel registration certificates with company name as owner.
-
Pricing Below $1,200/MT for Frozen Squid (2026 Baseline)
-
Unsustainable vs. fuel costs ($780/MT avg.). Indicates IUU catch or adulterated product.
-
Refusal to Provide Catch Documentation
-
Legitimate factories share fishing logs. Avoid suppliers citing “commercial confidentiality.”
-
Alibaba “Gold Supplier” Status Only
-
61% of verified traders hold this badge. Requires independent validation via Phase 1 checks.
-
No Traceability System for Vessel-to-Port
- Non-compliant with EU Regulation 1005/2008. Must show electronic catch documentation (e.g., China’s National Fishing Log System).
Recommended Action Plan
- Mandate Third-Party Audits: Use SourcifyChina’s Seafood Integrity Protocol (SIP-2026) for on-site vessel/facility verification.
- Require Blockchain Traceability: Insist on integration with platforms like IBM Food Trust or SeafoodChain for real-time catch data.
- Contract Stipulations:
- Clause: “Supplier warrants 100% legal origin of squid per FAO IUU Guidelines. Non-compliance = automatic termination + liquidated damages.”
- Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against verified catch documentation & pre-shipment inspection.
SourcifyChina Advisory: In 2026, Chinese squid processors face stricter MOFCOM export quotas. Prioritize suppliers with 2025-2026 squid export quotas (visible in customs data) to avoid supply disruption.
Next Steps for Procurement Leaders
✅ Immediate: Run target suppliers through our free China Seafood Supplier Risk Scanner (validates vessel docs/license in 72 hrs)
✅ Q2 2026: Attend SourcifyChina’s Seafood Compliance Summit (Shanghai, Apr 15) for live IUU risk mapping
✅ Ongoing: Subscribe to our China Fisheries Regulatory Tracker (free for procurement managers)
Authored by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification Data Source: China Ministry of Agriculture, FAO Global Record, SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database (n=317 suppliers)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Not for Distribution.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Strategic Procurement Insights for Global Buyers
Executive Summary: Optimizing Sourcing of Chinese Squid Fishing Operators
As global demand for sustainably sourced seafood continues to rise, procurement managers face mounting pressure to identify reliable, compliant, and high-capacity squid fishing suppliers in China. The fragmented nature of China’s marine export sector, combined with regulatory complexity and supply chain opacity, presents significant operational risks and delays for unassisted sourcing efforts.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Squid Fishing Companies in China eliminates these challenges through a rigorously vetted database of pre-qualified suppliers—each validated for legal compliance, export capability, vessel ownership, and sustainability certifications.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Cycle |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Reduces supplier screening time by up to 70% — no need for manual background checks, factory audits, or export license verification. |
| Verified Export Capacity | Confirmed cold-chain logistics, processing facilities, and international shipment experience — ensuring on-time delivery. |
| Regulatory Compliance | All listed companies meet Chinese MOC, Customs, and FAO fishing regulations — minimizing customs delays and compliance risks. |
| Direct Access to Decision Makers | Bypass layers of intermediaries with direct contact details for procurement and export managers. |
| Sustainability Documentation | Access to suppliers with MSC pre-certification, vessel monitoring systems (VMS), and IUU fishing compliance records. |
The Cost of Unverified Sourcing
Procurement teams relying on open-source platforms (e.g., Alibaba, B2B directories) often face:
– Wasted months engaging unlicensed brokers
– Inflated pricing due to middlemen
– Non-compliant catch documentation
– Shipment rejections at destination ports
With SourcifyChina’s Pro List, you gain immediate access to only qualified, operationally active squid fishing enterprises — accelerating RFQ cycles, improving negotiation leverage, and ensuring supply chain integrity.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t risk delays, compliance gaps, or supplier fraud in your seafood procurement. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Chinese Squid Fishing Companies is the only intelligence tool designed specifically for time-sensitive, compliance-driven global buyers.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team Now to request your customized Pro List and begin due diligence in under 24 hours.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our senior sourcing consultants are available Monday–Friday, 9:00–18:00 CST, to guide your team through supplier shortlisting, audit preparation, and contract negotiation.
SourcifyChina — Your Verified Gateway to China’s Seafood Supply Chain
Trusted by Procurement Leaders in 32 Countries
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
