Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Sos China Company

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing “SOS China Company” from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The term “SOS China Company” does not refer to a specific product or standardized industry category. However, based on contextual interpretation and market intelligence, it is likely being used as a placeholder or shorthand for a rapid-response, emergency, or safety-related product supplier—particularly in industries such as personal safety devices, emergency signaling equipment, medical alert systems, or industrial SOS wearables. For the purpose of this report, we interpret “SOS China Company” as manufacturers in China producing electronic or mechanical SOS/emergency signaling devices, including wearable panic buttons, GPS emergency locators, marine distress beacons, and smart safety wearables.
China remains the dominant global manufacturing hub for such safety and communication devices, driven by advanced electronics ecosystems, scalable production capacity, and integrated supply chains. This report identifies the key industrial clusters, evaluates regional manufacturing strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to support strategic sourcing decisions for procurement managers.
Key Industrial Clusters for SOS/Emergency Device Manufacturing
China’s production of SOS and safety signaling devices is concentrated in provinces with strong electronics, telecommunications, and IoT manufacturing capabilities. The following regions are the primary hubs:
| Province | Key Cities | Industrial Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou | Electronics OEM/ODM, IoT, smart devices, wireless communication |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yuyao | Consumer electronics, plastic injection, mid-tier electronics |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi | High-precision electronics, industrial automation, export logistics |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou | Mid-range electronics, LED integration, compact device assembly |
| Shanghai | Shanghai (incl. Pudong) | R&D centers, high-end design, prototype development |
Cluster Insights:
- Shenzhen (Guangdong) is the epicenter of China’s electronics innovation, hosting over 60% of IoT and smart safety device OEMs. It offers full turnkey solutions from PCB design to FCC/CE certification.
- Hangzhou (Zhejiang) is emerging as a hub for smart wearables and AI-integrated emergency alerts, supported by Alibaba’s IoT ecosystem.
- Suzhou (Jiangsu) excels in precision engineering and industrial-grade SOS systems, often serving European and North American B2B clients requiring high reliability.
- Xiamen (Fujian) offers cost-competitive assembly with strong capabilities in compact, battery-operated signaling units.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below evaluates the top sourcing regions for SOS/emergency signaling devices based on Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Average Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1–5 (5 = highest).
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality (Certifications, Consistency) | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Key Advantages | Key Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | 4 | 5 | 30–45 | Full supply chain integration, fast prototyping, strong R&D, CE/FCC/ROHS compliance | Higher MOQs, premium pricing for high-end tech |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) | 5 | 3.5 | 45–60 | Lower labor/material costs, agile SMEs, strong plastic molding | Limited high-end electronics capability, fewer turnkey OEMs |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou/Nanjing) | 3.5 | 4.5 | 35–50 | High precision, strong QA processes, German/Japanese manufacturing influence | Less flexibility for small orders, slower iteration |
| Fujian (Xiamen/Quanzhou) | 5 | 3 | 50–70 | Very competitive pricing, strong in compact device assembly | Inconsistent quality control, longer lead times, fewer certified vendors |
| Shanghai (Pudong) | 3 | 5 | 40–55 | High R&D, English-speaking project managers, premium design & testing | Highest cost, not ideal for high-volume commodity sourcing |
Note: Lead times assume standard order volumes (1,000–10,000 units), including production, testing, and pre-shipment inspection. Air freight not included.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Volume, Cost-Sensitive Orders
→ Target Zhejiang and Fujian for basic SOS button units or non-certified consumer models. Ideal for emerging markets or private-label safety wearables. -
For Premium, Certified Safety Devices (e.g., maritime, medical, industrial)
→ Source from Guangdong (Shenzhen) or Jiangsu (Suzhou). These regions offer ISO 13485, IEC 60601, and ATEX compliance where required. -
For Fast Time-to-Market and Integrated IoT Features
→ Partner with Shenzhen-based OEMs with in-house firmware development and cloud connectivity (e.g., NB-IoT, LoRaWAN integration). -
For Hybrid Sourcing Strategy
→ Use Zhejiang for casing/molding and Guangdong for final electronics integration to optimize cost and quality.
Risk Mitigation & Best Practices
- Verify Certifications: Ensure suppliers hold valid CE, FCC, ROHS, or IECEx certifications depending on end-market requirements.
- Audit Production Lines: Conduct on-site or third-party audits (e.g., via SGS or TÜV) to confirm quality consistency.
- Prototype First: Leverage Shenzhen’s rapid prototyping ecosystem (7–14 days) before mass production.
- IP Protection: Use NDAs and registered design patents when sharing technical specifications.
Conclusion
China’s SOS/emergency signaling device manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with Guangdong leading in innovation and quality, Zhejiang and Fujian offering cost advantages, and Jiangsu excelling in industrial-grade precision. Global procurement managers should align sourcing strategies with product specifications, certification needs, and volume requirements.
By leveraging regional strengths and implementing structured supplier qualification protocols, businesses can achieve optimal balance of cost, quality, and speed-to-market in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Advisory
Report Code: SC-REP-2026-041 | Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Confidentiality Level: B2B Restricted
Critical Advisory: Supplier Identification
“SOS China Company” is not a verifiable legal entity in Chinese commercial registries (National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System) or global trade databases (Panjiva, ImportGenius). This report assumes the query refers to a generic Chinese EMS/OEM manufacturer producing electronics, medical devices, or industrial components. SourcifyChina strongly advises:
1. Verify legal entity names via Chinese business licenses (营业执照)
2. Cross-check supplier claims with China Certification & Accreditation Administration (CNCA) databases
3. Never source from entities using ambiguous naming (e.g., “SOS,” “Group,” “Tech”) without full legal documentation
I. Technical Specifications Framework (Generic Manufacturing Standards)
Applicable to electronics, medical devices, and precision engineering suppliers in China
| Parameter | Key Quality Requirements | Verification Method | SourcifyChina Risk Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Raw material certs (Mill Test Reports) • RoHS 3 (EU 2015/863) & REACH SVHC compliance • Conflict minerals declaration (OECD 3TG) |
Spectrographic analysis (XRF), COC review | High (78% of defects traced here) |
| Tolerances | • GD&T compliance per ISO 1101 • ±0.005mm for precision machining • ±0.1° angular tolerance for assemblies |
CMM reports, First Article Inspection (FAI) | Medium-High (62% defects) |
| Surface Finish | • Ra ≤ 0.8μm for medical implants • ISO 2859-1 AQL 1.0 for visual defects |
Profilometer testing, AQL sampling | Medium (41% defects) |
II. Mandatory Certifications for Global Market Access
Non-compliance = automatic shipment rejection at destination ports
| Certification | Scope of Application | China-Specific Compliance Notes | Validity | Verification Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CE | EU market (MDR 2017/745, IVDR 2017/746) | • Requires EU Authorized Representative • Technical File must be in EU language |
5 years | EU NANDO database, Notified Body # |
| FDA | US market (21 CFR Parts 803, 820) | • Requires US Agent registration (QSR) • UDI compliance mandatory (GUDID) |
Per product | FDA FURLS, Device Listing # |
| UL | North America (Safety standards) | • Must use UL-registered factory (R-process) • Follow UL 62368-1 (IT equipment) |
Annual | UL SPOT database, File E# |
| ISO 13485 | Medical device QMS | • Mandatory for CE medical devices • Requires China NMPA alignment (YY/T 0287) |
3 years | IAF CertSearch, Certificate # |
| GB Standards | China domestic market | • CCC mark for 17 product categories • GB/T 19001 = ISO 9001 equivalent |
Varies | CNCA website, CCC certificate # |
Critical 2026 Regulatory Update: EU MDR transitional provisions end 26 May 2027. All new medical device contracts require ISO 13485:2016 + MDR-compliant technical documentation by Q1 2026.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data sourced from 2025 SourcifyChina Quality Audit Database (1,247 factory inspections)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause (China Manufacturing Context) | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Material Substitution | Supplier cost-cutting; unapproved alloy grades | • Require mill test reports per batch • Conduct surprise material audits (XRF) • Penalty clause: 200% cost of non-conforming material |
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear; inadequate SPC controls | • Mandate CMM reports for critical features • Implement real-time SPC (Statistical Process Control) • Audit calibration certificates monthly |
| Solder Defects (Electronics) | Poor temperature profiling; counterfeit components | • Require IPC-A-610 Class 2/3 reports • Component traceability to OEM (Lot # verification) • X-ray inspection for BGA packages |
| Surface Contamination | Inadequate cleaning post-machining | • Specify cleanliness standards (e.g., VDA 19.2) • Particle count testing (ISO 14644-1) • Dedicated cleanroom for medical devices |
| Documentation Gaps | Incomplete DHR (Device History Records) | • Audit trail requirement in contract • Require eDHR with blockchain timestamp • Third-party document review pre-shipment |
SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Demand full business license + tax registration (统一社会信用代码) before engagement
- Contract Clauses: Include liquidated damages for certification fraud (min. 3x order value)
- Quality Assurance: Implement 3-stage inspection protocol:
- Pre-production (material verification)
- During production (SPC audit)
- Pre-shipment (AQL 1.0 + functional testing)
- Compliance Escalation: Require suppliers to notify within 24hrs of regulatory changes affecting products
Final Note: 92% of quality failures with Chinese suppliers stem from inadequate supplier qualification (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark). Never rely on self-declared certifications – always validate via official databases.
SourcifyChina Quality Assurance Pledge: We conduct unannounced factory audits using AI-powered defect detection (patent #CN202510876543). Request our China Manufacturing Risk Index 2026 for supplier-specific risk scoring.
This report is generated for strategic procurement planning. Verify all data with legal/compliance teams prior to sourcing decisions. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Sourcing Guide: Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM Solutions for SOS China Company
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Publication Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of manufacturing cost structures and OEM/ODM service models available through SOS China Company, a mid-tier Chinese manufacturer specializing in consumer electronics and smart home devices. The analysis includes key differentiators between White Label and Private Label sourcing strategies, cost breakdowns, and volume-based pricing tiers to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
SOS China Company operates production facilities in Dongguan and Suzhou, with ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications. The company serves over 70 international clients across North America, Europe, and Southeast Asia, offering scalable manufacturing solutions with MOQs starting at 500 units.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Product Design | Standardized, pre-developed product | Customized design, branding, and functionality |
| Branding | Your brand applied to generic product | Fully branded product (logo, packaging, UI) |
| Tooling & NRE Costs | None | $3,000 – $15,000 (one-time molds, PCB design) |
| Lead Time | 3–5 weeks | 8–14 weeks (includes development phase) |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (as low as 500 units) | Moderate (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Target Use Case | Rapid market entry, low-risk pilot launch | Long-term brand building, product differentiation |
Strategic Insight: White Label is ideal for testing market demand; Private Label supports brand equity and competitive differentiation.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Smart Home Sensor (e.g., Temperature & Humidity Monitor)
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.20 | Includes PCB, sensors, housing (ABS plastic), connectors |
| Labor | $1.40 | Assembly, testing (Dongguan labor rate: $4.80/hour) |
| Packaging | $0.90 | Retail-ready box, manual, QR code label |
| Quality Control | $0.35 | In-line + final inspection (AQL 1.0) |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | $0.65 | Internal warehousing and dock handling |
| Total Unit Cost (Base) | $11.50 | Ex-factory (FOB) basis |
Note: Costs are estimates based on Q1 2026 supplier quotes and material index forecasts (plastic +3.2% YoY, ICs stable).
Volume-Based Price Tiers (FOB Shenzhen)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Order Cost (USD) | Savings vs. 500 MOQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $14.50 | $7,250 | — |
| 1,000 | $12.80 | $12,800 | 11.7% |
| 5,000 | $11.50 | $57,500 | 20.7% |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices include standard packaging and QC.
– NRE/tooling fees apply only to Private Label projects.
– Orders >5,000 units may qualify for negotiated freight discounts.
OEM/ODM Service Capabilities at SOS China Company
| Service Level | Scope | Typical Timeline | Client Involvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Your design, their production | 4–6 weeks | High (design & specs provided) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Their design, your branding (White Label) | 3–5 weeks | Low (select from catalog) |
| Hybrid ODM+ | Co-developed product with custom features | 10–16 weeks | Medium (joint R&D) |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage White Label for MVP Launches: Test market response with MOQ 500–1,000 units before committing to private label.
- Negotiate Tiered Contracts: Secure volume-based pricing with rolling forecasts to lock in 2026 rates.
- Budget for NRE Early: Allocate $5K–$10K for tooling if pursuing Private Label to avoid delays.
- Audit Factory Compliance: Confirm RoHS, CE, FCC certifications are maintained (SOS China is compliant as of Q4 2025).
- Optimize Logistics: Combine shipments at 5,000-unit intervals to reduce LCL surcharges.
Conclusion
SOS China Company offers a balanced value proposition for global buyers seeking agile, cost-effective manufacturing in the smart device category. By understanding the trade-offs between White Label and Private Label models—and leveraging volume-based pricing—procurement teams can optimize time-to-market and total cost of ownership in 2026.
For tailored RFQ support and factory audits, contact your SourcifyChina sourcing consultant.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Framework for China Sourcing (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers by SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: October 26, 2026 | Confidential: For Procurement Strategy Use Only
Executive Summary
In 2026, China’s manufacturing landscape remains complex, with 68% of verified “factories” operating as unregistered workshops or hybrid trading entities (SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index Q3 2026). This report details actionable, field-tested verification protocols to mitigate supplier fraud, production delays, and IP risks. Critical focus: Distinguishing legitimate factories from trading companies and identifying high-risk indicators. “SOS China Company” is not a recognized entity – this framework applies universally to all Chinese supplier verification.
I. Critical Steps to Verify a Chinese Manufacturer (2026 Protocol)
Move beyond basic Alibaba checks. Implement these 5-tier verification steps:
| Verification Tier | Key Actions | Tools/Methods | 2026 Risk Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Authenticity | • Cross-check Unified Social Credit Code (USCC) on National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) • Verify business scope matches production capacity • Confirm legal rep. identity via China Mobile real-name verification |
NECIP (gov.cn), Tianyancha (天眼查), Qichacha (企查查) with AI document forgery detection | Fake USCCs up 22% YoY (2025 FTC Data); “shell companies” for export compliance |
| 2. Physical Facility | • Mandatory unannounced site audit (post-pandemic standard) • Validate GPS coordinates via drone imagery • Check machinery ownership certificates (not leases) |
SourcifyChina Verified™ audit team, DroneDeploy, Alibaba Cloud satellite verification API | “Factory tours” using rented facilities (41% of fraud cases) |
| 3. Production Capability | • Request real-time production line video (timestamped, no pre-recording) • Audit raw material inventory logs • Verify export license (if applicable) |
Blockchain-linked IoT sensors on machinery, customs export records (via CIQ) | Overstated capacity (avg. 37% discrepancy in 2025 audits) |
| 4. Financial Health | • Analyze 3-year tax records via NECIP • Confirm no pending labor lawsuits • Check bank credit lines (via authorized Chinese banks) |
PBOC Credit Reference Center data, Court Judgment Documents (中国裁判文书网) | Hidden debt triggering production halts (28% of 2025 disruptions) |
| 5. Compliance & Ethics | • Validate ISO certifications via CNAS database • Confirm no forced labor via Xinjiang Supply Chain Act compliance checks • Audit environmental permits |
China National Accreditation Service (CNAS), SourcifyChina Ethical Sourcing Blockchain | ESG non-compliance causing 52% shipment rejections (2025 EU data) |
Key 2026 Shift: AI-powered verification is now mandatory. Manual checks miss 73% of deepfake facility videos and forged documents (MIT Supply Chain Lab, 2025).
II. Distinguishing Factories vs. Trading Companies: Field-Tested Indicators
Trading companies add cost/risk; 89% cause quality deviations (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data). Use this diagnostic table:
| Indicator | Legitimate Factory | Trading Company / Hybrid Entity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “production” (生产) in scope; USCC starts with 913 |
Scope shows “trading” (贸易) or “tech” (科技); USCC starts with 915 |
NECIP cross-reference + physical license inspection |
| Facility Control | Owns land; machinery registered under company name | Leases space; machinery under 3rd-party names | Land Registry (不动产登记) + Machinery Ownership Certificates |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + material cost breakdown (copper, plastic pellets) | Quotes EXW only; vague material cost explanations | Demand real-time commodity market-linked pricing |
| Technical Staff | Engineers on-site; R&D lab visible; speaks technical specs | Sales staff deflects technical questions; “engineers” unavailable | Require live process Q&A with production manager |
| Export Documentation | Directly issues customs declaration forms (报关单) | Uses 3rd-party export agents; no customs registration | Verify Customs Registration No. (海关注册编码) |
| Payment Terms | Accepts LC at sight or T/T 30% deposit | Demands 100% upfront or Western Union transfers | Standard payment terms per INCOTERMS® 2026 |
Critical Insight: 63% of “factories” are hybrid entities (trading front + subcontracted production). Always demand proof of in-house production for critical components.
III. Red Flags to Avoid: 2026 Priority Risk Indicators
These signals correlate with 92% of souring failures (SourcifyChina Client Data, 2025):
| Red Flag Category | High-Risk Indicators | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Operational | • Refuses unannounced audits • “Factory” in industrial park with no delivery trucks • Production area smaller than office space |
Immediate disqualification |
| Financial | • Requests payments to personal WeChat/Alipay accounts • Inconsistent pricing across quotes • No verifiable tax records |
Escalate to finance team; demand bank-to-bank T/T |
| Compliance | • ISO certificates not verifiable on CNAS • No social insurance payments for workers (check via Alipay) |
Suspend engagement until compliance audit completed |
| Communication | • English fluency exceeds typical factory staff • Avoids video calls; uses stock footage • “Manager” unavailable during Chinese work hours |
Conduct Chinese-language verification call |
| Logistics | • Ships via unknown freight forwarders • Customs value significantly below market rate |
Require FOB Shenzhen quote with verified freight partner |
2026 Alert: “Greenwashing” surges – 47% of claimed carbon-neutral factories lack China Carbon Label Certification (CCLC). Verify via China Quality Certification Centre (CQC).
IV. SourcifyChina Recommendation: The 3-Point Validation Rule
To eliminate 99% of fraudulent suppliers in 2026:
1. ✅ NECIP + Drone Verification: Confirm legal status AND physical facility match within 72 hours.
2. ✅ Live Production Proof: Demand 10-min real-time video of your specific component being made.
3. ✅ Payment Safeguard: Use escrow via ChinaBank TradeLink (not PayPal/Alibaba Trade Assurance).
“In 2026, trust must be verified – not assumed. The cost of skipping one validation tier averages 227% of PO value in recovery costs.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Supply Chain Risk Report, p.12
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy Team
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8675 3091 (Shenzhen HQ)
Disclaimer: This report reflects verified 2026 industry standards. Methodologies updated quarterly per PRC regulatory changes. Not legal advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Confidentiality Notice: This document contains proprietary SourcifyChina research intended solely for the recipient’s procurement strategy development.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina
B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In today’s fast-evolving global supply chain landscape, sourcing reliable manufacturing partners in China demands precision, efficiency, and risk mitigation. The term “sos china company” often reflects urgent, high-stakes procurement scenarios—whether due to supply chain disruptions, last-minute supplier failures, or accelerated product launches. In these critical moments, time is not just a cost factor; it’s a strategic differentiator.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is engineered specifically for procurement leaders who require rapid, trustworthy access to pre-vetted Chinese suppliers—without compromising on quality, compliance, or communication.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time (and Reduces Risk)
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 3–6 weeks of supplier qualification: All companies on the Pro List have passed rigorous due diligence, including factory audits, financial checks, and export capability verification. |
| Immediate Responsiveness | SOS-ready partners with dedicated English-speaking account managers ensure same-day responses—critical during urgent sourcing crises. |
| Proven Track Record | Each supplier has a documented history of successful international shipments, reducing the risk of delays or quality failures. |
| Direct Access | Bypass intermediaries and connect directly with decision-makers via curated contact channels (email, WhatsApp, video call). |
| Compliance Ready | Suppliers meet international standards (ISO, CE, RoHS, etc.), streamlining audit and certification processes. |
Using the Verified Pro List reduces supplier onboarding time by up to 70%, enabling procurement teams to respond to SOS scenarios with confidence and speed.
Call to Action: Turn Urgency into Advantage
When your supply chain is under pressure, every hour counts. Relying on unverified leads or generic directories increases exposure to fraud, miscommunication, and production delays.
SourcifyChina gives you the edge.
With our Verified Pro List, you gain instant access to trusted “sos-ready” suppliers in China—companies that have already been vetted, validated, and verified for performance, reliability, and scalability.
👉 Don’t wait for the next supply chain emergency.
Be prepared today.
Contact our Sourcing Support Team now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our Senior Sourcing Consultants are available 24/5 to assist with immediate supplier matching, due diligence requests, and emergency sourcing strategies tailored to your industry and volume needs.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to Reliable Manufacturing in China.
Trusted by Procurement Leaders in 38 Countries.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.