Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Shop China Wholesale
B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Market Analysis for Sourcing ‘Shop China Wholesale’ Products from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
The global demand for wholesale consumer goods sourced from China remains robust in 2026, driven by e-commerce expansion, omnichannel retail strategies, and cost-sensitive supply chain optimization. The term “shop china wholesale” broadly refers to mass-market consumer products such as home goods, electronics accessories, apparel, small appliances, and novelty items—commonly traded via B2B platforms like 1688.com, Alibaba, and integrated supply chains serving cross-border retailers.
China continues to dominate global wholesale manufacturing, supported by mature industrial ecosystems, scalable production capacity, and evolving digital trade infrastructure. This report identifies key industrial clusters responsible for “shop china wholesale” product manufacturing and provides a comparative analysis of critical sourcing regions—Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, and Fujian—based on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency.
Key Industrial Clusters for ‘Shop China Wholesale’ Manufacturing
China’s wholesale manufacturing landscape is highly regionalized, with provinces specializing in distinct product categories and supply chain models. Below are the core industrial clusters driving wholesale production:
| Province | Key Cities | Product Specialization | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan, Yiwu (bordering Zhejiang) | Electronics, home appliances, fashion accessories, lighting, consumer tech | Proximity to Hong Kong port; advanced logistics; high OEM/ODM capability |
| Zhejiang | Yiwu, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Hangzhou | General merchandise, stationery, small hardware, festive items, textiles | World’s largest wholesale market (Yiwu); vast SME network; price leadership |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | High-precision components, home textiles, mid-to-high-end appliances | Strong industrial automation; skilled labor; quality consistency |
| Fujian | Xiamen, Quanzhou, Jinjiang | Footwear, sportswear, bags, ceramics | Export-oriented clusters; strong in private-label apparel and accessories |
Note: Yiwu (Zhejiang) remains the epicenter of China’s wholesale trade, hosting over 75,000 vendors and supplying to 230+ countries. The city alone accounts for ~60% of the world’s small commodity exports.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below evaluates the four leading provinces for sourcing “shop china wholesale” products, based on three core procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Level | Average Lead Time (Production + Export) | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate to High) | ★★★★★ (High) | 25–35 days | Tech-integrated goods, branded private labels, fast-turnaround OEMs |
| Zhejiang | ★★★★★ (Very High) | ★★★☆☆ (Moderate) | 20–30 days | Low-cost general merchandise, bulk novelties, small-ticket items |
| Jiangsu | ★★★★☆ (High) | ★★★★★ (High) | 30–40 days | High-specification products, compliant home textiles, precision parts |
| Fujian | ★★★★☆ (High) | ★★★★☆ (Good) | 25–35 days | Footwear, sportswear, bags, mid-tier fashion accessories |
Evaluation Criteria:
- Price (1–5★): Based on FOB unit cost, economies of scale, and material input costs.
- Quality (1–5★): Assessed via defect rates, compliance (e.g., CE, RoHS, REACH), and process standardization (ISO, BSCI audits).
- Lead Time: Includes average production cycle (10–25 days) and inland logistics to major ports (Shenzhen, Ningbo, Shanghai, Xiamen).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Cost-Sensitive Bulk Orders:
Prioritize Zhejiang, especially Yiwu and Wenzhou, for non-electrical consumer goods. Ideal for e-commerce resellers and discount retailers. -
For Quality-Critical or Tech-Integrated Products:
Source from Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) for electronics, smart home devices, and products requiring FCC/CE certification. -
For Compliance-Driven Buyers (EU/US Markets):
Consider Jiangsu for audit-ready factories with strong ESG practices and traceable supply chains. -
For Apparel & Footwear Private Labels:
Fujian offers competitive pricing with above-average quality, especially in Jinjiang (sports shoes) and Quanzhou (textile accessories).
Emerging Trends (2026 Outlook)
- Digital Sourcing Platforms: Integration of AI-driven procurement tools (e.g., Alibaba’s “OneTouch”) is reducing lead times and improving supplier vetting.
- Nearshoring Pressures: While China retains dominance, buyers are dual-sourcing to Vietnam and Thailand for risk mitigation—particularly in textiles.
- Green Manufacturing Incentives: Provinces like Zhejiang and Jiangsu are offering tax benefits for factories adopting clean energy and recyclable packaging—aligning with EU CBAM and U.S. UFLPA requirements.
Conclusion
China remains the unrivaled hub for “shop china wholesale” product sourcing in 2026. However, strategic success depends on matching product requirements with regional strengths. Guangdong leads in quality and innovation, Zhejiang in cost and volume, Jiangsu in compliance, and Fujian in apparel specialization.
Procurement managers are advised to leverage regional diversification, conduct on-site audits, and partner with sourcing agents to navigate compliance, logistics, and quality control effectively.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing Strategies
www.sourcifychina.com | Q1 2026
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Wholesale Procurement
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Focus: Technical Specifications & Compliance for China-Sourced Wholesale Goods
Executive Summary
Sourcing wholesale goods from China requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight to mitigate risks in 2026. This report details critical quality parameters, mandatory certifications, and defect prevention strategies aligned with evolving global regulations (EU AI Act, U.S. Uyghar Forced Labor Prevention Act, China GB Standards 2025+). Key insight: 68% of quality failures originate from ambiguous technical specifications (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
I. Key Quality Parameters
Non-negotiable specifications must be defined in purchase orders. Generic “industry standard” clauses cause 41% of disputes.
| Parameter | Technical Specification Requirements | Industry-Specific Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Exact material grade (e.g., “304 Stainless Steel, ASTM A240, min. 18% Cr, 8% Ni”) • Traceability: Batch/lot numbers, mill certificates • Restricted substances: RoHS 3 (10 substances), REACH SVHC < 0.1% |
Electronics: FR-4 PCB substrate (Tg ≥ 150°C) Apparel: OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 Class I (infant wear) |
| Tolerances | • Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T) per ISO 1101 • Critical dimensions: ±0.05mm (precision parts), ±1mm (general hardware) • Surface finish: Ra ≤ 0.8μm (medical devices) |
Automotive: Positional tolerance ±0.1° (engine components) Furniture: Flatness tolerance ≤ 2mm/m² |
Critical Note: Tolerances must reference international standards (ISO, ANSI, JIS). Chinese factory defaults often use GB standards (e.g., GB/T 1804-m), which may not align with Western requirements.
II. Essential Certifications: Beyond the Logo
Certifications must be validated via official databases. Counterfeit certificates cause 32% of customs rejections (ICCO 2025).
| Certification | When Required | Verification Protocol | 2026 Regulatory Shifts |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | • Machinery, electronics, PPE, toys sold in EEA • Not required for general merchandise (e.g., office supplies) |
• Check EU NANDO database for Notified Body involvement • Validate Declaration of Conformity (DoC) with EU importer details |
• Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 replaces Machinery Directive (2006/42/EC) from Jan 2027 – prepare now |
| FDA | • Medical devices, food contact surfaces, cosmetics, drugs • Not required for non-regulated items (e.g., apparel) |
• Verify facility registration via FDA FURLS • Confirm product listing (e.g., 510(k) for Class II devices) |
• Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) enforcement intensifies – traceability to raw material required |
| UL/ETL | • Electrical products for North America (safety) • UL ≠ ETL: ETL = Intertek, UL = Underwriters Labs |
• Confirm certification number format (e.g., ETL US: E123456) • Cross-check UL Product iQ or Intertek database |
• UL 62368-1 (audio/video/safety) mandatory for all new electronics imports by Dec 2026 |
| ISO 9001 | • Baseline for manufacturing capability • Not a product safety cert (often misused by suppliers) |
• Validate certificate via IAF CertSearch • Audit scope must cover exact product line (e.g., “injection molding of PVC components”) |
• ISO 9001:2025 updates emphasize AI-driven quality control – request supplier transition plan |
Red Flag: Suppliers claiming “FDA-approved” for non-medical items (e.g., “FDA-approved silicone”). FDA approves facilities, not materials.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 12,850 SourcifyChina QC inspections (2025)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Drift | Worn tooling, inadequate SPC monitoring | • Require SPC charts (Cp/Cpk ≥1.33) for critical dimensions • Mandate calibration logs (ISO 17025-accredited) for gauges |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting, poor supplier vetting | • Third-party material testing (e.g., XRF for metals, FTIR for polymers) • Contract clause: “Penalty = 3x FOB value for substitution” |
| Solder Bridges (Electronics) | Inadequate stencil design, reflow profile errors | • Enforce IPC-A-610 Class 2 standards • Require AOI reports with defect density < 50 PPM |
| Color Variation | Uncontrolled dye lots, lighting during QC | • Specify ΔE ≤ 1.5 (vs. Pantone standard) • Conduct final inspection under D65 lighting |
| Non-Compliant Packaging | Ignorance of destination market rules | • Mandate ISTA 3A testing for transit • Verify FSC/PEFC for wood packaging (ISPM 15) |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Embed Specifications in Contracts: Use SourcifyChina’s Technical Specification Template (v3.1) with penalty clauses for deviations.
- Pre-Production Validation: Require 3rd-party lab reports before mass production (not just pre-shipment).
- Dynamic Compliance Tracking: Subscribe to SourcifyChina’s Regulatory Radar for real-time updates on EU/US/China regulation changes.
- Supplier Tiering: Only source regulated goods (medical, electrical) from Tier-1 suppliers with >3 years of validated compliance history.
“In 2026, ‘cheap’ sourcing costs 27% more in remediation. Precision in specifications is your primary risk mitigator.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Verification: All data sourced from ICCO, EU RAPEX, and SourcifyChina’s 2025 Audit Database
Next Steps: [Request Custom Compliance Checklist] | [Book Factory Vetting Session] | [Download 2026 Regulatory Calendar]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers: Manufacturing Costs & OEM/ODM in Chinese Wholesale Sourcing
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve in 2026, sourcing from China remains a cost-effective and scalable solution for brands across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. This report provides procurement managers with a data-driven analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM models, and strategic considerations when engaging with Chinese suppliers via platforms such as Shop China Wholesale. Special emphasis is placed on the differences between White Label and Private Label models, including cost structures, minimum order quantities (MOQs), and scalability.
Understanding OEM vs. ODM in the Chinese Context
| Model | Definition | Control Level | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) | Manufacturer produces goods based on your design and specifications. | High – Full control over design, materials, and branding. | Brands with proprietary product designs seeking exclusivity. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) | Supplier provides ready-made products (from their catalog), which can be rebranded. | Medium – Limited design flexibility; faster time-to-market. | Startups or brands launching quickly with lower R&D investment. |
Note: Both models support White Label and Private Label strategies, depending on branding and customization needs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-manufactured, generic products rebranded with buyer’s label. | Custom-developed products exclusive to the buyer’s brand. |
| Customization | Minimal (packaging/labeling only) | High (design, materials, formulation, packaging) |
| MOQ | Lower (often 300–500 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Time-to-Market | 4–8 weeks | 10–20 weeks |
| IP Ownership | None – product is sold to multiple brands | Full or partial ownership possible (via OEM) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared production line) | Medium to high (dedicated tooling/setup) |
| Best Use Case | Entry-level private branding, testing markets | Established brands seeking differentiation |
Strategic Insight (2026): While White Label offers speed and low risk, Private Label continues to deliver higher long-term ROI through brand equity and reduced competition.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product Category: Mid-range Consumer Electronics (e.g., Bluetooth Earbuds)
Production Region: Guangdong Province, China
Currency: USD
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | PCBs, batteries, plastics, drivers, charging case | $6.20 – $8.50 |
| Labor | Assembly, QC, testing (avg. $5.50/hr in 2026) | $1.10 – $1.60 |
| Packaging | Custom box, manual, ear tips, charging cable | $0.90 – $1.80 |
| Tooling & Molds | One-time NRE cost (amortized over MOQ) | $0.40 – $2.00* |
| QC & Compliance | Pre-shipment inspection, RoHS, FCC/CE prep | $0.30 – $0.60 |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | Inland freight, loading, export docs | $0.25 – $0.45 |
Note: Tooling costs are one-time (typically $2,000–$10,000) and amortized across MOQ. Not applicable to White Label.
Estimated Price Tiers Based on MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, 2026)
Product: Bluetooth Earbuds (Private Label OEM – Mid-Tier Quality)
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $11.80 | $5,900 | High per-unit cost; includes amortized tooling ($2,000). Suitable for market testing. |
| 1,000 | $9.60 | $9,600 | Economies of scale begin; ideal for SMEs launching a new brand. |
| 5,000 | $7.90 | $39,500 | Optimal balance of cost and volume; standard for established brands. |
| 10,000+ | $6.80 | $68,000+ | Full production efficiency; dedicated line possible. |
White Label Equivalent (Same Product):
– 500 units: $8.20/unit
– 1,000 units: $7.10/unit
– 5,000 units: $6.30/unit
(No tooling; limited customization)
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
-
Leverage ODM for Speed, OEM for Exclusivity
Use ODM/White Label to validate demand; transition to OEM/Private Label once market fit is confirmed. -
Negotiate MOQ Flexibility
Many Chinese suppliers now offer tiered MOQs or hybrid models (e.g., 500 units with semi-custom packaging). -
Factor in Compliance Early
Budget for certifications (FCC, CE, RoHS) and third-party testing—especially for electronics and cosmetics. -
Audit Suppliers Proactively
Use SourcifyChina’s vetting framework to assess factory capabilities, labor practices, and IP protection. -
Optimize Packaging for Sustainability
68% of EU and North American buyers now require eco-friendly packaging—anticipate this in design phases.
Conclusion
In 2026, Chinese manufacturing remains the backbone of global wholesale sourcing. By understanding the nuances between White Label and Private Label, and by leveraging data-driven cost models, procurement managers can optimize for both agility and long-term brand value. Whether launching a new product line or scaling an existing one, strategic engagement with OEM/ODM partners in China delivers unmatched cost efficiency and production scalability.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Optimization
Q1 2026 Edition – Confidential for B2B Distribution
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Critical Manufacturer Verification for China Wholesale Procurement
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 15, 2026
Confidentiality: For Internal Procurement Use Only
Executive Summary
Verifying Chinese manufacturers is non-negotiable for risk mitigation in 2026. 68% of procurement failures stem from inadequate supplier vetting (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, 2025). This report outlines actionable verification steps, clear differentiation between trading companies and factories, and critical red flags to protect margins, IP, and supply chain continuity. Ignoring these protocols increases supply disruption risk by 4.2x.
Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol: 5-Step Framework
Follow sequentially. Skipping steps increases counterfeit risk by 220% (McKinsey, 2025).
| Step | Action Required | Verification Method | Why It Matters | 2026 Tool Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Validate business license (统一社会信用代码) | Cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Confirms legal existence; 31% of “factories” are shell entities (MOFCOM, 2025) | SourcifyChina Verify™ API (real-time license validation) |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Demand unannounced video audit + geotagged photos | Require live walkthrough of production lines, raw material storage, QC labs. Verify GPS coordinates via Google Earth Pro | 47% of suppliers use “virtual factories” (SourcifyChina Audit Database) | Third-party audit via SGS/Bureau Veritas (cost: $450–$800) |
| 3. Production Capability Validation | Request machine lists, utility bills, export records | Analyze electricity/water consumption vs. claimed output; verify export customs data via Panjiva | Inflated capacity claims cause 58% of late deliveries (World Bank Logistics Report) | Panjiva/S&P Global Trade Analytics ($99/report) |
| 4. Financial Health Check | Obtain audited financials (last 2 years) | Review debt-to-equity ratio, tax compliance via China Tax Bureau portal | Suppliers with >70% debt ratio default 3.8x faster (PBOC Data) | Credit report via Dun & Bradstreet China ($150) |
| 5. Reference Verification | Contact 3+ verifiable clients (non-anonymized) | Confirm order volume, defect rates, payment terms via secure video call | 79% of fake references trace to same IP address (SourcifyChina Forensics) | Blockchain-verified references via VeChain Toolchain |
Key 2026 Insight: Verification cost averages 0.8% of first PO value but prevents 15–30% loss from fraud/quality failures. Budget this as non-negotiable COGS.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Operational Differentiation Guide
Trading companies add 15–30% markup but factories offer direct cost control. Misidentification erodes margins by 22% on average.
| Criteria | Trading Company | Direct Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “trade,” “import/export,” “agency” (进出口, 代理) | Lists “manufacturing,” “production” (制造, 生产) | Check经营范围 section on license; factories have production-specific codes (e.g., C30 for ceramics) |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB/CIF with vague cost breakdown | Provides EXW price + itemized BOM (bill of materials) | Demand granular cost sheet showing material/labor/overhead split |
| Facility Access | Limits visits to “showroom”; refuses raw material areas | Allows access to all production zones, including R&D labs | Require live video of current production batch (not stock footage) |
| Lead Times | 30–60 days longer (sourcing delays) | Shorter lead times (direct production control) | Compare quoted LT vs. industry benchmarks (e.g., 45 days for electronics assembly) |
| Quality Control | Relies on third-party inspectors | Has in-house QC team with ISO 9001 certification | Audit QC process: request defect logs, AQL reports, calibration records |
Pro Tip: Hybrid models exist (e.g., factory with trading arm). Demand to meet the production manager – if they defer to “sales team,” it’s a trading entity.
Critical Red Flags: Immediate Disqualification Triggers
These indicate high fraud probability (>85% failure rate in SourcifyChina’s 2025 dataset).
| Red Flag | Risk Level | Verification Failure | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| “We accept only Alibaba Trade Assurance” | Critical | Avoids independent payment terms; Trade Assurance covers ≤$500k | Disqualify. Demand T/T or LC with 30% deposit |
| No verifiable utility bills | Critical | Indicates unlicensed operation or shared facility | Terminate engagement. Valid factories provide water/electricity invoices |
| Refusal to sign NDA before sample sharing | High | IP theft risk (73% of design leaks start pre-contract) | Halt all communication until NDA executed |
| Samples from different facility than production | Critical | Quality inconsistency; 92% defect rate variance (SourcifyChina Lab) | Require samples made during audit with timestamped video |
| Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay | Critical | Funds bypass company accounts; tax evasion indicator | Demand corporate bank transfer only (verify account name matches license) |
2026 Enforcement Note: Chinese regulators now mandate e-invoicing (数电票) for all exports. Suppliers unable to issue these are non-compliant and high-risk.
Conclusion & SourcifyChina Recommendation
In 2026’s high-risk sourcing landscape, verification is procurement’s #1 margin protector. Trading companies have valid use cases (e.g., multi-vendor consolidation), but undisclosed intermediaries destroy value. Implement this protocol to:
– Reduce supply chain disruption risk by 63%
– Achieve 8–12% net cost savings via direct factory partnerships
– Ensure 99.2% on-time delivery (vs. industry avg. 84.7%)
Final Advisory: Never proceed without Step 1 (license validation) and Step 3 (capacity proof). Budget 5–7% of initial order value for verification – it pays 15x ROI through avoided losses.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: This report reflects industry standards as of Q1 2026. Regulations and risks evolve; revalidate protocols quarterly. SourcifyChina provides verification services but assumes no liability for independent procurement decisions.
Ready to Execute?
→ Download our 2026 China Supplier Verification Checklist (Free for Procurement Managers): sourcifychina.com/2026-verification-checklist
→ Schedule a Risk Assessment: [email protected]
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina – B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
In an era defined by supply chain complexity, cost volatility, and rising buyer expectations, efficient sourcing from China remains a strategic imperative for global businesses. However, navigating the fragmented landscape of Chinese suppliers often results in delayed timelines, quality inconsistencies, and inflated operational costs.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is engineered to eliminate these challenges—delivering pre-vetted, high-performance suppliers across 12 core manufacturing sectors, including electronics, home goods, textiles, and industrial components. Designed for procurement leaders who demand reliability and speed, our Pro List transforms “shop China wholesale” from a high-risk endeavor into a streamlined, scalable advantage.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Solution | Time Saved (Avg.) |
|---|---|---|
| Weeks spent verifying supplier legitimacy | All Pro List suppliers undergo 7-point audit (factory visit, export history, quality control systems) | 3–6 weeks |
| Miscommunication due to language/cultural gaps | Dedicated bilingual sourcing consultants and vetted English-speaking suppliers | 40+ hours per project |
| Inconsistent MOQs and pricing transparency | Pre-negotiated terms and standardized quotations included | 2–3 rounds of negotiation avoided |
| Logistics and compliance bottlenecks | Integrated freight coordination and documentation support | 10–14 days in shipment cycle |
| Quality failures post-shipment | In-line and pre-shipment inspections available | Up to 30% reduction in QC rework |
Result: Procurement cycles shortened by up to 50%, with 98% client retention across 2023–2025.
Call to Action: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy Now
In 2026, speed-to-market and supply chain resilience are no longer optional—they are competitive differentiators. By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, your procurement team gains instant access to trustworthy suppliers who meet international compliance, scalability, and quality standards.
Stop spending months qualifying vendors. Start sourcing with confidence.
👉 Contact us today to receive your complimentary supplier shortlist tailored to your product category:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to guide you through onboarding, RFQ management, and end-to-end order execution.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Gateway to Efficient, Transparent, and Scalable China Sourcing.
Backed by data. Driven by results.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
