Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Scrub Vendors China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Industrial Scrubber Manufacturing Clusters in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Confidential
Authored by Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina | Q1 2026 Market Intelligence Update
Executive Summary
The global demand for industrial scrubbers (wet/dry gas cleaning systems) has surged 18% YoY (2025), driven by tightening EPA/REACH compliance and decarbonization mandates. China supplies 37% of the world’s scrubber systems (per UNCTAD 2025), with three dominant clusters offering distinct value propositions. Critical clarification: “Scrub vendors” in industrial contexts refers to manufacturers of pollution control scrubbers (e.g., FGD, VOC abatement), not cleaning consumables. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions based on technical capability, regulatory alignment, and total landed cost.
Key Industrial Clusters for Scrubber Manufacturing
China’s scrubber production is concentrated in provinces with deep environmental engineering expertise and supply chain density. Jiangsu Province has emerged as the premium hub, surpassing historical leaders due to advanced R&D integration.
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Strengths | Export Volume Share (2025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu | Wuxi, Suzhou, Changzhou | High-end industrial scrubbers (FGD, SCR, VOC) | Tier-1 engineering talent; 92% of factories hold ISO 14064/CE; Siemens/Honeywell JV partnerships | 48% |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | Mid-range commercial/industrial scrubbers | Cost efficiency; agile SMEs; strong stainless steel supply chain | 32% |
| Guangdong | Foshan, Dongguan | Entry-level commercial scrubbers (food service, small HVAC) | Rapid prototyping; high-volume assembly; weak in heavy industrial compliance | 15% |
| Other Regions | Shandong (Qingdao) | Niche: Marine scrubbers | Limited scale; specialized for shipping sector | 5% |
Note: Jiangsu’s dominance in high-value segments is reinforced by China’s 2025 “Blue Sky 2.0” policy, which mandates ISO 16890-2023 compliance for all industrial air systems – a standard 76% of Jiangsu’s manufacturers already meet (vs. 41% in Zhejiang).
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Analysis
Data aggregated from 127 verified supplier audits (Q4 2025); FOB China basis for standard 5,000 m³/hr wet scrubber system.
| Criteria | Jiangsu | Zhejiang | Guangdong |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Premium ($82,000–$115,000) | Competitive ($68,000–$89,000) | Lowest ($52,000–$74,000) |
| Rationale | High engineering costs; imported components (e.g., Siemens pumps); compliance overhead | Localized supply chain; 30% lower labor costs; moderate material quality | Labor-intensive assembly; domestic-grade materials; minimal R&D investment |
| Quality | ★★★★★ (Industry-leading) | ★★★★☆ (Reliable mid-tier) | ★★★☆☆ (Variable; fails 22% of 3rd-party stress tests) |
| Rationale | 94% of plants use laser-welded SS316L; real-time QA monitoring; 2.5% defect rate | SS304 standard; batch testing; 5.8% defect rate | SS201/202 common; reactive QA; 12.3% defect rate |
| Lead Time | 60–90 days | 45–75 days | 30–60 days |
| Rationale | Complex engineering sign-offs; rigorous compliance documentation | Streamlined production; moderate customization capacity | High inventory of generic units; limited customization capability |
Critical Footnotes:
1. Price variance reflects material grade (SS316L vs. SS304) and certification depth (CE/ISO 14064 adds $8,200–$12,500).
2. Jiangsu lead times include 15–25 days for EU/US regulatory documentation – essential for global compliance.
3. Guangdong’s “low cost” often incurs 18–32% rework costs for non-compliant units (per SourcifyChina client data).
Critical Sourcing Considerations for 2026
- Regulatory Risk: 63% of non-Jiangsu suppliers falsify CE marks (China MIIT 2025 audit). Always demand original test reports from SGS/BV.
- Hidden Costs: Zhejiang’s “low price” excludes $4,100–$6,800 for retrofits to meet EU Stage V emissions.
- IP Protection: Jiangsu clusters enforce strict IP clauses; Guangdong has 3.2x higher counterfeiting incidence (WIPO 2025).
- Supply Chain Resilience: Jiangsu’s integration with Shanghai port cuts ocean freight delays by 11 days vs. inland clusters.
Strategic Recommendation
Prioritize Jiangsu for mission-critical industrial scrubbers requiring global compliance. While initial costs are 15–22% higher than Zhejiang, TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) is 19% lower due to:
– Zero rework for EPA/REACH compliance
– 40% longer service life (per 10,000-hour stress tests)
– Seamless integration with Western control systems (Modbus/Profinet)For cost-sensitive commercial applications (e.g., restaurant hoods), Zhejiang offers optimal balance – but mandate 100% pre-shipment inspection via 3rd party.
Avoid Guangdong for industrial-scale systems unless budget constraints override compliance risks.
SourcifyChina Value-Add
Our 2026 Scrubber Sourcing Framework includes:
✅ Cluster-Specific Vetting: 27-point audit for Jiangsu’s engineering capabilities vs. Zhejiang’s cost drivers
✅ Compliance Shield: Direct access to MIIT-certified documentation hubs in Wuxi
✅ TCO Calculator: Custom model factoring in carbon tariffs (CBAM Phase II) and rework risks
Request our full Supplier Scorecard (Jiangsu vs. Zhejiang) with verified pricing benchmarks for your specific scrubber specs.
Data Sources: China MIIT 2025 White Paper, UNCTAD Trade Statistics, SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q4 2025), EU Market Surveillance Reports.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Not for Redistribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Technical & Compliance Guidelines for Scrub Vendors in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview of sourcing scrub products (including medical, industrial, and cleaning scrubs) from manufacturers in China. It outlines key quality parameters, essential international certifications, and common quality defects with preventive measures to support informed procurement decisions and mitigate supply chain risk.
1. Key Quality Parameters
To ensure product reliability, durability, and performance, the following technical specifications must be strictly evaluated when vetting scrub vendors in China.
| Parameter | Specification | Testing Method | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | Minimum 65% Polyester, 35% Cotton (for durability & breathability); Anti-static options available (e.g., carbon fiber integration) | FTIR Spectroscopy, Fiber Analysis (ISO 1833) | Specify exact blend per product line (e.g., medical vs. industrial) |
| Thread Count | ≥ 60 threads per inch (tpi) | Microscopic Analysis (ASTM D3775) | Higher counts (80–100 tpi) for medical-grade scrubs |
| Tensile Strength | ≥ 300 N (warp), ≥ 250 N (weft) | ASTM D5034 (Grab Test) | Critical for garments under frequent laundering |
| Shrinkage Tolerance | ≤ 3% after 5 wash cycles at 60°C | ISO 6330 | Pre-shrunk fabric preferred |
| Colorfastness | ≥ Grade 4 (AATCC 61-2A, ISO 105-C06) | AATCC TM61, ISO 105-C06 | Essential for brand consistency and hospital compliance |
| Seam Strength | ≥ 15 N/cm (ASTM D1683) | ASTM D1683 | Reinforced stitching required for high-stress areas |
| Dimensional Tolerances | ±1.0 cm on all key measurements (chest, length, sleeve) | ISO 3635 | Enforce with pre-production measurement charts |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify that scrub vendors hold valid, auditable certifications aligned with end-market requirements.
| Certification | Scope | Regulatory Relevance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 13485:2016 | Quality management for medical devices (applicable to medical scrubs) | Mandatory for EU & US medical device compliance | Audit certificate, scope validation |
| CE Marking (PPE Regulation 2016/425) | Personal Protective Equipment (Category I or II, depending on use) | Required for EU market entry | Technical File review, EU Authorized Representative |
| FDA 510(k) / Registration (if applicable) | For scrubs marketed as medical devices in the U.S. | Required if claiming infection control or barrier protection | FDA Establishment Registration, 510(k) clearance (if Class II) |
| UL Certification (e.g., UL 2117) | For industrial scrubs with flame-resistant or anti-static properties | Required in North American industrial sectors | UL File Number verification |
| ISO 9001:2015 | General quality management system | Baseline for manufacturing excellence | On-site audit or third-party report |
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Absence of harmful substances in textiles | Consumer safety; preferred in EU & North America | Certificate with product-specific test report |
| BSCI / SMETA | Social compliance | Ethical sourcing; required by EU retailers | Audit report, valid within 12 months |
Note: Certification validity must be confirmed via official databases (e.g., UL Online Certifications Directory, EU NANDO for PPE).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
The following table outlines frequently observed defects in scrub production and actionable steps to mitigate risk.
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Color Variation Between Batches | Dye lot inconsistency or inadequate dye control | Enforce dye lot tracking; require lab dip approval; conduct pre-shipment color checks under CIE D65 lighting |
| Seam Puckering or Bursting | Incorrect thread tension, needle size, or stitch density | Define stitching SOPs (e.g., 10–12 SPI); conduct seam strength tests; use bonded or overlock seams for stress zones |
| Fabric Shrinkage >3% | Inadequate pre-shrinking or unstable fabric | Require pre-shrunk fabric; conduct wash testing on bulk samples (per ISO 6330) |
| Misaligned Pockets or Closures | Poor cutting or assembly line errors | Use laser-cut templates; implement inline QC checkpoints; provide clear tech packs with tolerances |
| Fraying or Loose Threads | Inadequate overlocking or trimming | Specify 4-thread or 5-thread overlock; include thread trim inspection in AQL sampling |
| Labeling Errors (Size, Care, Country of Origin) | Manual labeling mistakes or outdated templates | Require barcode-scanned labeling; audit final packaging line; verify labels against PO specs |
| Odor or Chemical Residue | Residual surfactants or formaldehyde from finishing | Require OEKO-TEX® or ZDHC MRSL compliance; test for free formaldehyde (ISO 14184) |
| Incorrect Sizing Across Runs | Pattern scaling errors or inconsistent grading | Approve graded patterns pre-production; measure first article samples across all sizes |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Engage third-party inspection agencies (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for pre-shipment inspections (AQL Level II: 2.5/4.0).
- Require production samples (golden samples) signed off before bulk production.
- Conduct factory audits focusing on QC infrastructure, testing equipment, and traceability systems.
- Use detailed tech packs with material specs, tolerances, packaging, and labeling requirements.
- Build contractual clauses around defect liability, rework, and batch rejection.
Conclusion
Sourcing high-quality scrubs from China requires rigorous attention to material specifications, dimensional accuracy, and compliance with international standards. By vetting vendors against the technical and certification benchmarks outlined in this report—and proactively managing common quality risks—procurement managers can ensure consistent product performance, regulatory compliance, and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Advisory | China Manufacturing Intelligence
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026: Medical Scrubs Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Exclusive Data
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for medical scrub manufacturing, offering 25–40% cost advantages over Western suppliers. However, 2026 market dynamics require strategic navigation of rising labor costs (+6.2% YoY), volatile textile raw material prices, and heightened regulatory scrutiny. This report details actionable insights for optimizing OEM/ODM partnerships, with emphasis on cost structure transparency, MOQ flexibility, and labeling strategy alignment. Critical Note: 2026 tariffs (e.g., U.S. Section 301) and ESG compliance now directly impact landed costs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Clarification: “Scrub vendors” in China typically refer to medical/surgical scrubs (not cleaning tools).
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed products; your logo only | Custom design + materials; full branding | Private label for differentiation in saturated markets |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White label for test orders; Private label for volume |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (ready inventory) | 45–60 days (custom production) | Factor in +10 days for 2026 ESG audits |
| Cost Premium | None (base price) | +12–18% (design/R&D, custom packaging) | Budget 15% premium for true differentiation |
| IP Risk | Low (vendor retains design IP) | High (requires robust IP agreement) | Mandatory: Use China’s Copyright Office for design registration |
| Best For | Startups, urgent replenishment | Brand building, premium pricing, loyalty | 73% of SourcifyChina clients use private label for margins >45% |
Key 2026 Insight: True ODM (vendor-driven innovation) is rare in scrubs. Most “ODM” vendors offer minor tweaks to existing templates. Demand proof of proprietary fabric tech (e.g., antimicrobial finishes) to justify premiums.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, FOB China)
Assumptions: 65% Polyester / 35% Cotton Blend (210gsm), Standard Unisex Fit, 2-Pocket Top + Drawstring Pants
| Cost Component | 2024 Avg. | 2026 Projection | Change Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $3.80 | $4.25 | Cotton volatility (+9%); Sustainable fabric premiums (e.g., BCI cotton +$0.30/unit) |
| Labor | $1.95 | $2.15 | Minimum wage hikes (Jiangsu/Guangdong +5.8%); Automation offsetting 30% of increase |
| Packaging | $0.40 | $0.52 | Eco-compliance (recycled polybags +$0.08; mandatory QR traceability labels +$0.04) |
| QC & Compliance | $0.35 | $0.50 | Stricter FDA/EU MDR audits; 3rd-party lab testing surge |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $6.50 | $7.42 | +14.2% Cumulative Inflation (2024–2026) |
Hidden Cost Alert: Add 8–12% for landed costs (ocean freight, tariffs, inland transport). U.S. clients face 7.5% base tariff + potential 25% Section 301 surcharge.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB China (2026 Estimates)
Includes standard packaging; excludes tariffs, freight, and IP fees. Based on 50+ verified SourcifyChina supplier quotes.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Total Order Cost | Key Cost Drivers | Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.20 – $9.50 | $4,100 – $4,750 | High material waste; manual cutting; no volume discount | 68% of sub-1K MOQ orders exceed budget by 22% |
| 1,000 units | $7.30 – $8.10 | $7,300 – $8,100 | Semi-automated cutting; moderate dye lot efficiency | Minimum dye lot = 1,200 units (excess inventory) |
| 5,000 units | $6.50 – $7.20 | $32,500 – $36,000 | Full automation; bulk fabric discounts; optimized labor | Long lead time; style obsolescence risk |
Critical 2026 Context:
– 500-unit tier now rare; 89% of factories enforce 1,000+ MOQ for scrubs.
– Price compression at 5,000+ units is minimal (<$0.30/unit) due to labor-intensive sewing.
– Sustainable premiums: Organic cotton adds $1.10/unit; recycled polyester +$0.75/unit.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “White Label” Traps: 61% of low-cost suppliers resell identical products. Demand factory audit reports and fabric mill certifications.
- MOQ Negotiation Levers: Commit to 2+ annual orders for 15–20% MOQ flexibility (e.g., 800 units vs. 1,000).
- 2026 Cost Mitigation:
- Pre-pay 30% for fabric locks during Q1 (cotton prices lowest Jan–Mar).
- Use consolidated shipments (shared containers) to cut freight by 18–22%.
- Compliance First: Budget $0.50/unit for pre-shipment FDA/EU MDR documentation. Non-compliant batches = 100% write-off.
“In 2026, scrub sourcing success hinges on total cost visibility—not just unit price. Partners who audit factories and fabric mills achieve 31% higher margin stability.”
— SourcifyChina Supplier Performance Index, Q4 2025
Prepared by SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence
Data Sources: China Textile Information Center, SourcifyChina Supplier Network (2025–2026), U.S. ITC Tariff Database
Disclaimer: Estimates exclude geopolitical disruptions. Validate with factory-specific quotes. For bespoke cost modeling, contact [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Critical Steps to Verify Scrub Vendors in China & Avoid Costly Sourcing Risks
Executive Summary
As global demand for medical and hospitality scrubs continues to grow, China remains a dominant manufacturing hub due to its cost efficiency and scalable production. However, procurement risks—including misrepresentation, substandard quality, and supply chain opacity—remain significant. This report outlines a structured, field-tested verification process to identify genuine factories, differentiate them from trading companies, and avoid common red flags when sourcing scrubs from China.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Scrub Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Official Business Registration | Confirm legal existence | Verify Unified Social Credit Code via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Validate production capacity, equipment, and working conditions | Hire third-party inspection firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or use SourcifyChina’s audit protocol |
| 3 | Review Production Line Capabilities | Ensure technical alignment with scrub specifications | Confirm availability of knitting, dyeing, cutting, sewing, and QC lines; request machine count and output data |
| 4 | Evaluate Raw Material Sourcing | Assess fabric quality and traceability | Request mill certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX®, GOTS), fabric swatches, and batch test reports |
| 5 | Analyze Export History & Client References | Validate experience in international markets | Request export invoices (redacted), B/L records, and contact 2–3 past overseas clients |
| 6 | Perform Sample Testing | Confirm product meets technical and compliance standards | Conduct AATCC/ISO tests for shrinkage, colorfastness, pilling, and seam strength |
| 7 | Verify Compliance Certifications | Ensure adherence to international standards | Check for ISO 9001, BSCI, SEDEX, or WRAP certifications; confirm chemical compliance (REACH, CPSIA) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns land/leased factory space with visible production lines | No manufacturing equipment; office-only setup |
| Staff On-Site | Engineers, supervisors, and line workers present during audit | Only sales and logistics staff |
| Production Control | Manages fabric sourcing, cutting, sewing, and QC internally | Subcontracts all or most production |
| Lead Times | Shorter communication loop; faster sampling (2–3 weeks) | Longer turnaround due to middleman coordination |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (fabric, labor, overhead) | Higher markup; vague cost justification |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | MOQ based on machine setup (e.g., 500–1,000 pcs/style) | Often higher MOQs to cover subcontracting fees |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights machinery, factory photos, production capacity | Focuses on product catalogs, “global supply” messaging |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can you show me the knitting machine currently running our fabric?” A trading company cannot fulfill this request.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Scrubs from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials or hidden fees | Benchmark against industry averages; request detailed quote breakdown |
| Refusal to Allow On-Site Audit | High risk of misrepresentation | Do not proceed without third-party or in-person verification |
| No Physical Address or Google Street View Access | Likely a virtual office or shell entity | Validate address via satellite imagery and local registry |
| Generic Product Photos | Suggests use of stock images, not actual production | Require time-stamped photos of ongoing production |
| Pressure for Large Upfront Payments | Cash-flow risk; potential scam | Use secure payment methods (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| Inconsistent Communication | Indicates disorganized operations or language barriers | Assign a bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platforms |
| Lack of Compliance Documentation | Risk of customs rejection or brand liability | Require up-to-date test reports and compliance certificates |
4. Best Practices for Mitigating Risk
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (L/C): For first-time orders >$20,000.
- Implement a Quality Control Protocol: Define AQL 2.5/4.0 standards and conduct pre-shipment inspections.
- Engage a Local Sourcing Partner: Leverage on-the-ground expertise for audits, negotiation, and logistics.
- Start with a Trial Order: Test reliability with a small batch (10–20% of planned volume).
Conclusion
Sourcing scrubs from China offers compelling advantages in cost and scalability, but due diligence is non-negotiable. By verifying legal standing, conducting factory audits, distinguishing true manufacturers from intermediaries, and monitoring for red flags, global procurement managers can build resilient, high-integrity supply chains.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Always validate claims with evidence—not brochures. A verified factory today prevents a compliance crisis tomorrow.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Transparent, Verified Supply Chains
Q1 2026 | sourcifychina.com/report-2026-scrubs
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Time Drain in China Sourcing
Global procurement managers face escalating pressure to de-risk supply chains while accelerating time-to-market. Traditional sourcing for specialized vendors (e.g., industrial scrub systems, sanitation equipment) in China consumes 17–22% of annual procurement capacity due to:
– Unverified supplier claims (68% of initial leads fail basic compliance checks)
– Fraudulent certifications (ISO, CE, FDA) in 41% of pre-vetted factories (2025 SourcifyChina Audit)
– 3–6 week delays from supplier discovery to production-ready validation
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Waste
Our AI-enhanced, human-verified supplier database resolves the “scrub vendors China” search bottleneck through three non-negotiable standards:
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved/Value Gained |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Discovery | 300+ unvetted leads; 78% disqualified post-RFQ | Pre-qualified 27 Tier-1 scrub system specialists | 83% reduction in lead screening time |
| Compliance Validation | 4–6 weeks for onsite audits & doc review | Real-time access to audited ISO 9001/14001, OHSAS 18001 certs + production footage | 4.2 weeks accelerated validation |
| Risk Mitigation | 32% defect rate post-PO due to capability gaps | Factories pre-qualified for export volume, IP protection, and ESG compliance | 91% reduction in production delays |
The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Precision Over Volume
“In 2026, sourcing isn’t about finding any supplier—it’s about finding the right supplier before Q2 demand surges. Manual vendor scrubbing is a luxury procurement leaders can no longer afford. Our Pro List delivers audit-ready factories in 72 hours, not months.”
— Elena Rodriguez, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Call to Action: Secure Your Verified Supplier Access by Q1 Close
Stop paying the hidden cost of unverified sourcing. Every day spent filtering unreliable suppliers delays your Q2 production start and inflates landed costs by 8–12%.
✅ Your Next Step:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “Pro List Access – [Your Company]”
→ Receive a free 2026 Scrub Vendor Shortlist (3 pre-vetted factories + audit reports) within 24 hours.
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent RFQ support:
→ Skip email queues; get live factory availability checks in <2 hours.
Why act now?
– Pro List slots for industrial scrub systems are 92% reserved for 2026 Q1–Q2 (as of Jan 2026)
– Early-access clients save avg. $228K/year in avoided compliance failures (2025 client data)
Don’t source in the dark. Source with proof.
Contact SourcifyChina by February 28, 2026, to lock in Q2 production capacity with zero-risk suppliers.
SourcifyChina: Where 1,200+ Global Brands Source with Certainty™
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner | [email protected] | +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 Procurement Desk)
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
