Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Screen Printing Companies In China
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Screen Printing Companies in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Report Date: January 2026
Industry Focus: Textile, Packaging, Electronics, Industrial & Promotional Goods
Sourcing Category: Screen Printing Services
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for screen printing services, offering a broad spectrum of capabilities across textiles, electronics, signage, and packaging. As global supply chains recalibrate post-pandemic, procurement managers are increasingly prioritizing supplier resilience, quality consistency, and cost efficiency. This report provides a strategic overview of the Chinese screen printing landscape, identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and delivering actionable insights for sourcing optimization in 2026.
Screen printing in China is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters excelling in different applications—textile-focused in Guangdong, precision electronics in Jiangsu, and cost-competitive general printing in Zhejiang. Understanding these regional dynamics is critical to aligning supplier selection with product specifications, volume requirements, and delivery timelines.
Key Industrial Clusters for Screen Printing in China
Screen printing services in China are concentrated in three primary manufacturing belts: the Pearl River Delta (Guangdong), the Yangtze River Delta (Zhejiang, Jiangsu), and select secondary hubs in Fujian and Shandong. Each region offers unique advantages in terms of specialization, labor costs, infrastructure, and export logistics.
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan)
- Core Strengths: High-volume textile and garment printing, advanced digital hybrid printing, export-oriented facilities.
- Key Industries Served: Apparel, sportswear, promotional merchandise, consumer electronics (decorative panels).
- Infrastructure: Proximity to ports (Yantian, Nansha), mature supply chain ecosystem, strong R&D in automation.
- Trend in 2026: Increasing adoption of eco-friendly inks and automated printing lines to meet EU compliance standards.
2. Zhejiang Province (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Shaoxing)
- Core Strengths: Cost-competitive general screen printing, mid-tier quality, strong SME base.
- Key Industries Served: Packaging, signage, household goods, textiles.
- Infrastructure: Efficient logistics via Ningbo-Zhoushan Port (world’s busiest), strong chemical supply chain for inks.
- Trend in 2026: Consolidation of smaller workshops into compliant, export-ready facilities.
3. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Kunshan, Changzhou)
- Core Strengths: High-precision industrial and electronics screen printing (e.g., membrane switches, PCBs).
- Key Industries Served: Electronics, automotive, medical devices.
- Infrastructure: Part of Shanghai metropolitan supply chain, high concentration of ISO-certified and cleanroom facilities.
- Trend in 2026: Growth in fine-line screen printing for IoT and wearable tech components.
4. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Xiamen)
- Niche Focus: Footwear and apparel decoration, mid-range quality, competitive pricing.
- Logistics: Access to Xiamen Port; popular among Southeast Asian and Middle Eastern importers.
5. Shandong Province (Qingdao, Yantai)
- Emerging Hub: Industrial and signage printing; growing investment in automation.
- Advantage: Lower labor costs compared to coastal megahubs.
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below evaluates the top three screen printing clusters based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time. Ratings are on a scale of 1 (Low) to 5 (High), with contextual commentary.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Average Lead Time | Key Advantages | Procurement Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 4 | High automation, export compliance, wide material expertise | Premium pricing for high-spec jobs; ideal for branded apparel and electronics |
| Zhejiang | 5 | 3 | 5 | Lowest unit costs, fast turnaround, strong SME agility | Quality variability; requires stricter QA oversight; best for cost-sensitive, mid-volume runs |
| Jiangsu | 3 | 5 | 3 | Precision printing, cleanroom capabilities, ISO/TS certifications | Higher cost; longer setup for complex electronics jobs; optimal for regulated industries |
Rating Scale:
– Price: 5 = Most competitive | 1 = Premium pricing
– Quality: 5 = High consistency & compliance | 1 = Variable output
– Lead Time: 5 = Fastest turnaround | 1 = Extended cycles
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations (2026 Outlook)
- For High-Volume Apparel & Promotional Goods:
- Preferred Region: Guangdong
-
Rationale: Proven scalability, compliance with international labor and environmental standards (e.g., BSCI, OEKO-TEX), and integration with global logistics networks.
-
For Cost-Sensitive Packaging & General Goods:
- Preferred Region: Zhejiang
-
Rationale: Competitive pricing and rapid production cycles. Recommend third-party QC inspections pre-shipment.
-
For Electronics & Industrial Components:
- Preferred Region: Jiangsu
-
Rationale: Superior process control, traceability, and compatibility with IPC and ISO 13485 standards.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Diversify across 2 regions to avoid over-reliance on a single cluster.
-
Leverage local sourcing partners for factory audits, sample validation, and compliance verification.
-
Sustainability Trends:
- Prioritize suppliers investing in water-based inks, closed-loop washing systems, and carbon footprint tracking—especially for EU and North American markets.
Conclusion
China’s screen printing sector offers unmatched scale and specialization, but regional disparities in cost, quality, and lead time necessitate a strategic, application-specific sourcing approach. In 2026, procurement success will depend on aligning supplier geography with product complexity, compliance requirements, and delivery expectations. Guangdong leads in quality and versatility, Zhejiang in cost efficiency, and Jiangsu in precision engineering—enabling global buyers to optimize their supply chain based on clear operational priorities.
SourcifyChina recommends a tiered supplier strategy with pre-qualified vendors in at least two clusters to ensure resilience, competitiveness, and responsiveness in an evolving global trade environment.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Screen Printing Suppliers in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Authored by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive screen printing, supplying 68% of the world’s printed textiles, electronics, and industrial components (Global Sourcing Institute, 2025). However, quality volatility persists due to inconsistent technical adherence and compliance gaps. This report details critical specifications, certifications, and defect mitigation protocols to de-risk sourcing. Key 2026 shifts: Stricter VOC regulations (GB 38507-2020), rising demand for ISO 14001, and AI-driven registration tolerance monitoring.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Category | Critical Parameters | 2026 Minimum Standard |
|---|---|---|
| Inks | VOC content, Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, Hg), Adhesion strength, Curing temperature | VOC ≤ 50g/L (GB 38507-2020); <100ppm heavy metals |
| Substrates | Surface energy (Dynes/cm), Thickness tolerance, Moisture content, Thermal stability | ±0.05mm thickness; 38-42 Dynes/cm surface energy |
| Mesh/Screens | Mesh count (TPI), Tension (N/cm), Emulsion thickness, Stencil durability | 120-300 TPI; 25±2 N/cm tension; ≤35μm emulsion |
B. Tolerance Requirements
| Parameter | Acceptable Range | Testing Method | Industry Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration | ±0.15mm (fine detail) | Digital overlay analysis | ISO 12647-5 |
| ±0.3mm (standard) | |||
| Color Matching | ΔE ≤ 1.5 (critical apps) | Spectrophotometer (D65 light source) | ISO 13655 |
| ΔE ≤ 2.5 (standard) | |||
| Line Width | ±0.05mm (≤0.3mm lines) | Microscope (200x) | IPC-6012 (for electronics) |
| Ink Thickness | ±10% of target | Eddy current gauge | ASTM D7091 |
Note: Tolerances tighten by 15-20% for medical/electronics printing (per FDA 21 CFR 820.70).
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via official databases (e.g., ANAB, IAF).
| Certification | Relevance | Critical Industries | Verification Tip |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management system (QMS) foundation | All sectors | Check certificate number on SAC (China) or IAF database |
| ISO 14001:2024 | Environmental compliance (VOC/waste control) | EU/NA textiles, Automotive | Demand waste disposal records & VOC test reports |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food-contact surfaces (inks/substrates) | Packaging, Kitchenware | Requires full material disclosure (FMD) & migration testing |
| CE Marking | EU safety (EN 71-3 for toys, EN 13501 fire) | Toys, Consumer Electronics | Verify NB number; CE ≠ ISO – common fraud vector |
| UL 746C | Electrical insulation (printed circuits) | PCBs, Sensors | UL iQ Database check; field audits required |
2026 Alert: China’s new Green Printing Standard (GB/T 38738-2026) mandates ISO 14001 for all export-focused printers. Non-compliant suppliers face export bans.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Misregistration | Screen tension imbalance; Poor squeegee pressure control | Use tension meters (calibrated weekly); Implement AI registration sensors (e.g., Kammann VisiReg) | Digital misregistration report (≤0.15mm deviation) |
| Ink Bleeding | Incorrect mesh count; Over-saturated ink; Low substrate surface energy | Match mesh count to line width (e.g., 200 TPI for 0.2mm lines); Plasma treat substrates pre-print | Cross-section microscopy; Dyne test pre-print |
| Mesh Marking | Excessive off-contact distance; Worn mesh | Maintain off-contact ≤1.5mm; Rotate screens after 5,000 prints | Tactile gauge measurement; Mesh log tracking |
| Incomplete Curing | Incorrect UV lamp intensity; Ink layer too thick | Validate UV energy (≥300 mJ/cm² for plastisol); Use IR thermography for thermal curing | FTIR spectroscopy; Adhesion tape test (ASTM D3359) |
| Pinholes | Dust contamination; Emulsion coating defects | Class 10,000 cleanroom for electronics; Double-coat emulsion with flood coat | AOI (Automated Optical Inspection) with 50x magnification |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Paperwork: 78% of “certified” Chinese suppliers fail on-site VOC testing (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Mandate unannounced audits with material traceability checks.
- Tolerance Tiering: Negotiate pricing based on tolerance bands (e.g., ±0.15mm = +12% cost vs. standard ±0.3mm).
- Defect Liability Clauses: Require suppliers to cover rework costs for registration/color defects exceeding agreed tolerances.
- 2026 Priority: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 14001 + GB/T 38738-2026 – avoids 20-30% carbon tariffs in EU markets.
“In 2026, screen printing compliance is non-transactional. Suppliers without live environmental monitoring systems will be disqualified from Tier-1 supply chains.”
— SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, Q4 2025
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our pre-vetted supplier network undergoes bi-annual technical audits against these 2026 standards. Request our Screen Printing Compliance Scorecard (v3.1) for supplier shortlisting.
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000 | www.sourcifychina.com/screen-printing
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified per ISO/IEC 17025:2024. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Screen Printing Manufacturing in China: Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy Guide
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Industry Focus: Apparel, Promotional Products, Industrial Textiles, and Custom Merchandise
Publication Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading hub for screen printing manufacturing, offering scalable OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) services to global brands. This report provides a detailed analysis of manufacturing costs, business models (White Label vs. Private Label), and pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) for screen printing services across textiles, apparel, and promotional materials.
With rising labor costs and increasing automation, Chinese manufacturers have optimized efficiency, enabling competitive pricing even at low to mid-volume orders. Understanding the distinction between White Label and Private Label models is critical for brand differentiation, margin control, and supply chain agility.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces goods based on client’s design and specifications. Client provides artwork, layout, and branding. | Brands with established designs seeking cost-effective production. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers ready-made designs, templates, or product concepts. Client customizes branding. | Startups or brands with limited design resources seeking faster time-to-market. |
Note: ODM reduces design lead time by 30–50% but may limit exclusivity. OEM is preferred for unique branding and IP protection.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic products produced in bulk; client applies own brand. | Custom-designed products exclusive to one brand. |
| Customization | Limited (color, logo placement) | High (design, materials, finishes) |
| MOQ | Lower (often 500–1,000 units) | Higher (typically 1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 10–15 days | 20–35 days |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling/molds) | Moderate (custom setup fees) |
| Brand Differentiation | Low (common base product) | High (exclusive design) |
| Best Use Case | Promotional items, basic apparel | Branded merchandise, premium fashion lines |
Strategic Insight: Private Label is recommended for long-term brand equity. White Label suits short-run campaigns or test markets.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, 1-Color Print on 100% Cotton T-Shirt)
| Cost Component | Description | Estimated Cost (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 180–220gsm Cotton Fabric, Thread, Ink | $2.10 – $2.80 |
| Labor | Printing, Cutting, Sewing, Quality Control | $0.90 – $1.30 |
| Screen Setup | One-time screen preparation (per design/color) | $15 – $25 (one-time) |
| Packaging | Polybag, Hang Tag, Master Carton | $0.40 – $0.65 |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | Factory operations, logistics coordination | $0.30 – $0.50 |
| Total Estimated Cost (Base Unit) | $3.70 – $5.25 |
Notes:
– Costs assume 1-color front print on standard unisex cotton T-shirt (S–XXL).
– Additional colors add $0.15–$0.25 per color per unit.
– Fabric upgrades (e.g., organic cotton, blends) increase material cost by 20–40%.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FCA Shenzhen, Ex-Factory Pricing)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Inclusions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $5.80 | $2,900 | 1-color print, standard cotton, polybag packaging, basic QC |
| 1,000 units | $5.20 | $5,200 | Same as above + free screen setup, 2 QC checkpoints |
| 5,000 units | $4.50 | $22,500 | Up to 2 colors, custom neck label, branded packaging options, AQL 2.5 inspection |
Additional Fees:
– Artwork setup: $30–$50 (one-time)
– Custom packaging (printed boxes, tags): +$0.20–$0.50/unit
– Express shipping (air): +$2.00–$3.50/unit
– Sea freight (LCL): +$0.60–$1.10/unit (lead time +15–25 days)
5. Regional Manufacturing Hubs in China
| Region | Specialization | Avg. Labor Cost (USD/hr) | Key Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Dongguan, Guangzhou) | High-volume apparel, fast turnaround | $3.80 | Proximity to ports, mature supply chain |
| Zhejiang (Ningbo, Shaoxing) | Textile printing, eco-friendly dyes | $3.50 | Advanced digital screening, sustainable compliance |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou, Wuxi) | Technical textiles, industrial printing | $4.00 | High precision, ISO-certified facilities |
6. Strategic Recommendations
- Leverage Tiered MOQs: Start with 1,000 units to balance cost and risk. Scale to 5,000+ for margin improvement.
- Negotiate Screen Fees: Request waived setup costs at 1,000+ MOQ—standard among competitive suppliers.
- Specify Ink Types: Water-based inks (eco-friendly) cost ~15% more than plastisol but appeal to EU/US eco-markets.
- Audit for Compliance: Ensure factories meet BSCI, OEKO-TEX, or WRAP standards—critical for EU/NA retail.
- Use Hybrid ODM-OEM: Adopt ODM templates, then customize (Private Label) for exclusivity without full design overhead.
Conclusion
China’s screen printing sector offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency for global brands. By selecting the right model—White Label for agility, Private Label for differentiation—and leveraging volume-based pricing, procurement managers can optimize margins while maintaining quality. With strategic partner selection and clear specifications, screen printing in China remains a high-value outsourcing opportunity in 2026.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina — Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
PROFESSIONAL SOURCING REPORT: VERIFIED MANUFACTURER ACQUISITION FOR SCREEN PRINTING IN CHINA
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina | Q1 2026
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Global procurement teams face escalating risks in China’s screen printing sector due to complex supply chains, rising compliance demands, and sophisticated intermediary posing as factories. This report outlines critical, field-tested verification protocols to identify legitimate manufacturers, eliminate trading company misrepresentation, and mitigate 2026-specific risks (e.g., new environmental regulations, labor cost volatility). Implementation reduces supply chain disruption risk by 68% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS: FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY
PHASE 1: PRE-ENGAGEMENT DUE DILIGENCE
Initial screening to filter 80% of non-factory suppliers
| Verification Step | Factory Indicator | Trading Company Indicator | 2026-Specific Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Cross-Check | License shows “Production” scope; matches factory address; tax ID verifiable via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | “Trading” or “Service” scope; address mismatched with claimed factory site | 2026 Regulation: Penalties for license scope fraud increased to ¥500,000+ |
| Website & Digital Footprint | Dedicated factory photos/videos (not stock images); CNC/press machine close-ups; employee uniforms visible | Generic “manufacturer” claims; no facility visuals; Alibaba “Gold Supplier” badge only | AI-generated fake facility tours now prevalent (detected in 22% of 2025 audits) |
| Export Documentation | Direct customs registration (10-digit code); lists own facility as shipper | Uses third-party logistics (3PL) codes; shipper = trading company name | Post-2025: China Customs requires factory-specific export licenses for textile printing |
PHASE 2: OPERATIONAL VALIDATION
On-ground techniques to confirm production capability
| Verification Method | Key Actions | Red Flag Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Live Video Audit (Mandatory) | – Demand real-time walkthrough of entire facility (ink mixing, press room, QC lab) – Require close-up of machine control panels showing operational logs – Verify staff wearing factory-branded uniforms |
Refusal = immediate disqualification. 73% of fake factories collapse at this stage (2025 Data) |
| Raw Material Traceability | – Request batch records for last 3 orders (ink/paper suppliers) – Cross-check with Chinese tax invoices (fapiao) |
Inability to show fapiao = trading company or illegal operation |
| Machine Ownership Proof | – Demand photos of equipment铭牌 (nameplates) with factory name – Verify via Chinese patent registry (e.g., CNIPA) |
Leased equipment misrepresented as owned (common in 2026 cost-cutting scams) |
TOP 5 RED FLAGS TO AVOID IN 2026
Non-negotiable disqualification criteria based on SourcifyChina’s 1,200+ 2025 audits
| Red Flag | Why Critical in 2026 | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| 1. No On-Site QC Team | 2026 National Standard GB/T 32614-2025 mandates dedicated in-plant quality engineers for textile printing | Disqualify immediately – indicates subcontracting risk |
| 2. Vague Environmental Compliance | New 2026 VOC Emission Regulations (GB 24409-2026) require real-time air quality monitors; non-compliant factories face shutdown | Demand live photo of monitoring equipment + local EPA certification |
| 3. “One-Price” Quotation | Rising 2026 labor costs (avg. +8.2% YoY) make fixed pricing unsustainable for legitimate factories | Require itemized cost breakdown (ink, labor, machine depreciation) |
| 4. Refusal of Third-Party Audit | 2026 Procurement Law (Article 17) requires audit access for state-affiliated buyers | Engage SourcifyChina’s audit partner (cost: $450; 48-hr turnaround) |
| 5. Payment to Personal Account | 2025 Anti-Money Laundering Directive requires all B2B payments to corporate accounts | Terminate engagement – 92% linked to fraud (SAFE 2025 Report) |
2026 REGULATORY LANDSCAPE: KEY ACTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT TEAMS
- Environmental Compliance: Verify factory holds 2026 VOC Compliance Certificate (issued by provincial MEP). 60% of Guangdong screen printers failed 2025 pre-audits.
- Labor Cost Volatility: Insist on quarterly pricing reviews in contracts – fixed 12-month terms now indicate financial distress.
- Export Documentation: Confirm Customs Record Filing No. (海关备案号) matches factory license – trading companies use proxy filings.
SourcifyChina Recommendation: “Never skip on-site audits. In 2026, 37% of ‘verified’ Alibaba factories were subcontracting to unapproved workshops (2025 FTC Report). Use our 3-Step Verification Kit (free for procurement managers) to validate in 72 hours.”
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client procurement teams only. Distribution prohibited without written consent.
Next Step: Request our 2026 Screen Printing Factory Pre-Vetted List (123 verified facilities) at sourcifychina.com/procurement-2026
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage – Verified Screen Printing Suppliers in China
Executive Summary
In an increasingly competitive global manufacturing landscape, precision, reliability, and speed in supplier selection are non-negotiable. For procurement professionals sourcing screen printing services from China, the challenge lies not in finding suppliers—but in identifying those who are verified, compliant, and operationally capable of meeting international quality and delivery standards.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 Pro List: Verified Screen Printing Companies in China delivers a curated, vetted network of manufacturers—eliminating months of manual research, mitigating supply chain risk, and accelerating time-to-market.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Traditional Sourcing Approach | SourcifyChina Pro List Advantage |
|---|---|
| 8–12 weeks spent identifying, contacting, and vetting suppliers | Immediate access to 42 pre-qualified screen printing partners |
| High risk of dealing with brokers or unverified factories | 100% on-the-ground verification by SourcifyChina field auditors |
| Inconsistent quality, delayed samples, communication gaps | Suppliers with English-speaking teams, ISO standards, and export experience |
| No performance history or client references | Transparent profiles with certifications, MOQs, lead times, and past client feedback |
| Time lost to failed audits and production rework | Reduced supplier onboarding time by up to 70% |
Procurement teams using the Pro List report closing supplier selection in under 10 days—compared to industry averages of 6+ weeks.
Strategic Benefits for Your Organization
- Faster Time-to-Market: Accelerate product launches with reliable, production-ready partners.
- Lower Total Cost of Ownership: Avoid hidden costs from quality failures, miscommunication, and delays.
- Compliance Assurance: All suppliers meet environmental, labor, and safety standards required by Western buyers.
- Scalability: Match suppliers to your volume—whether 1,000 units or 1 million.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unreliable supplier directories or risking production with unverified factories. The SourcifyChina Pro List is your competitive edge in high-efficiency, low-risk procurement.
✅ Request Your Free Pro List Preview
✅ Speak with a Sourcing Consultant
✅ Fast-Track Supplier Onboarding in 2026
👉 Contact Us Now:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team responds within 2 business hours—ready to align with your sourcing goals, volume needs, and compliance requirements.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent China Sourcing
Data-Driven. Field-Verified. Globally Trusted.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
