Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Sango China Company History
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for “Sango China Company History”
Date: April 5, 2026
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic analysis for global procurement managers seeking to source products associated with the term “Sango China Company History”—a phrase that appears to reference Sango, a prominent Chinese manufacturer of ceramic tableware and home décor products. Sango Group, headquartered in Guangdong Province, is a leading exporter of high-quality porcelain and stoneware, particularly known for its international distribution through major retail chains.
While “Sango China Company History” is not a product category per se, it reflects buyer inquiries rooted in brand-specific sourcing. This report interprets the request as a demand for Sango-branded or Sango-style ceramic tableware and analyzes the industrial clusters in China responsible for manufacturing such products. The analysis includes a comparative assessment of key production regions to guide procurement decisions on price, quality, and lead time.
1. Understanding the Product Category
Product Type:
Ceramic tableware (dinner sets, mugs, serving dishes), decorative ceramics, and kitchenware.
Brand Context – Sango Group:
– Founded in 1986, Sango is one of China’s largest ceramic exporters.
– Headquarters: Chaozhou, Guangdong Province.
– Primary manufacturing base: Chaozhou and Meizhou, Guangdong.
– Exports to over 80 countries, with strong presence in Europe, North America, and Australia.
– Known for modern designs, lead-free glazes, and compliance with international food safety standards (e.g., FDA, LFGB).
2. Key Industrial Clusters for Ceramic Tableware in China
China’s ceramic manufacturing is concentrated in several industrial hubs, each with distinct capabilities. For Sango-style products (high-volume, export-grade ceramics), the following provinces are critical:
| Region | Key Cities | Specialization | Key Manufacturers | Export Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Chaozhou, Shantou, Meizhou | High-volume porcelain & stoneware; export-focused | Sango Group, Fenghua, Longsheng | ~40% of national exports |
| Jiangxi | Jingdezhen | Premium porcelain (artistic and traditional) | Hong Ye, Tang Ju, numerous SMEs | ~25% |
| Fujian | Dehua | White porcelain, figurines, giftware | Hengxing, Sinoart, Qiaolong | ~15% |
| Zhejiang | Lishui, Wenzhou | Mid-range ceramics; private label manufacturing | Numerous OEMs & ODMs | ~10% |
| Shandong | Zibo | Industrial ceramics, tableware, and tiles | Hualing, Huayang | ~8% |
Note: Sango Group operates primarily in Chaozhou, Guangdong, which is the epicenter for mass-produced, export-grade tableware. Over 90% of Sango’s production is based in this cluster.
3. Regional Comparison: Price, Quality, and Lead Time
The table below compares the four leading regions for sourcing Sango-style ceramic tableware, based on 2025–2026 market data collected from supplier audits, factory visits, and client shipments.
| Region | Average Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (Production + Export) | Key Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $0.80 – $1.50 | High (Export-Grade) | 30–45 days | Proximity to Hong Kong/Shenzhen ports; Sango ecosystem; strong compliance with EU/US standards | Higher MOQs; limited customization for small buyers |
| Jiangxi | $1.20 – $3.00 | Premium (Artisanal) | 45–60 days | Superior craftsmanship; fine porcelain; custom design capabilities | Slower production; higher costs; logistics less efficient |
| Fujian | $0.70 – $1.30 | Medium to High | 35–50 days | Competitive pricing; strong for white ware and gift sets | Less consistent quality control across suppliers |
| Zhejiang | $0.60 – $1.10 | Medium (Commercial) | 25–40 days | Lower prices; flexible MOQs; strong for private label | Lower perceived quality; fewer large-scale certified factories |
Note: Pricing based on a standard 16-piece dinner set (stoneware, white glaze, basic design), FOB Guangzhou/Shenzhen.
4. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
For Buyers Seeking Sango-Equivalent Quality & Volume:
- Primary Sourcing Region: Chaozhou, Guangdong
- Leverage proximity to Sango’s supply chain for competitive benchmarking.
- Target certified OEMs with export experience and BSCI/SEDEX compliance.
- Utilize Guangdong’s logistics infrastructure for faster shipment to global markets.
For Premium or Artisanal Lines:
- Secondary Option: Jingdezhen, Jiangxi
- Ideal for high-margin, design-driven collections.
- Requires deeper supplier vetting and longer planning cycles.
For Cost-Sensitive or Private Label Programs:
- Alternative: Zhejiang or Fujian
- Lower entry barriers and flexible MOQs.
- Best suited for mid-tier retail or e-commerce brands.
5. Risk & Compliance Considerations
- Regulatory Compliance: Ensure suppliers provide FDA (USA), LFGB (EU), and Prop 65 (California) certifications.
- Sustainability: Increasing demand for eco-friendly kilns and reduced lead/cadmium glazes.
- IP Protection: Register designs and monitor for unauthorized use of Sango-like branding.
- Geopolitical Risk: Diversify sourcing beyond single regions to mitigate port congestion or policy shifts.
6. Conclusion
While “Sango China Company History” references a specific brand, the underlying sourcing opportunity lies in China’s ceramic tableware manufacturing ecosystem, with Guangdong Province—specifically Chaozhou—as the dominant hub. Procurement managers should prioritize this region for Sango-comparable quality, scale, and compliance. Strategic partnerships with audited OEMs in Guangdong, supported by contingency sourcing in Fujian or Zhejiang, will optimize cost, quality, and supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing Strategies
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Sourcing Advisory Report: Coral Calcium Supplement Sourcing (Sango Coral)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | SourcifyChina Reference: SC-AD-2026-089
Clarification on “Sango China Company History”
Critical Note: “Sango Coral” refers to a marine mineral supplement derived from fossilized Sango coral (Lithophyllum okamurai), historically sourced from Okinawa, Japan—not a Chinese company. No credible “Sango China” manufacturing entity exists for coral calcium production. Sourcing this product from China carries significant regulatory and quality risks, as:
– Authentic Sango coral deposits are exclusive to Okinawa, Japan (protected geographical indication).
– Chinese suppliers often mislabel non-coral calcium carbonate (e.g., limestone, oyster shell) as “Sango Coral.”
– Procurement Advisory: Prioritize Japanese or EU-based certified suppliers. If sourcing from China is unavoidable, implement rigorous verification protocols (see Section 3).
Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements
Applicable to Authentic Coral Calcium Supplements (Misrepresented as “Sango Coral” in China)
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Requirement | Tolerance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium Source | 100% Lithophyllum okamurai fossil coral | 0% non-coral material | Isotope ratio MS (δ¹³C, δ¹⁸O) |
| Calcium Content | 31-34% elemental calcium | ±0.5% | ICP-MS/AOAC 968.08 |
| Particle Size | ≤10 μm (for optimal bioavailability) | D90 ≤12 μm | Laser diffraction (ISO 13320) |
| Heavy Metals | Pb ≤0.5 ppm, As ≤0.1 ppm, Cd ≤0.2 ppm, Hg ≤0.1 ppm | Zero tolerance | EPA 6020B (ICP-MS) |
| Moisture | ≤5.0% | ±0.3% | Karl Fischer titration (ASTM E1064) |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Critical Requirements | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDA GRAS | USA | DSHEA compliance, cGMP (21 CFR 111), heavy metal limits | Annual |
| EU Novel Food | EU | Pre-market authorization (EU 2015/2283), contaminant screening | Case-specific |
| ISO 22000 | Global | HACCP-based food safety management system | 3 years |
| JAS Organic | Japan | Japanese Agricultural Standard (for Okinawan coral) | Annual |
| CEP | EU | Certificate of Suitability (EDQM) for calcium products | 5 years |
⚠️ China-Specific Risk: Chinese suppliers commonly provide fraudulent “ISO” or “FDA” certificates. Always validate via:
– FDA’s OASIS database (not “FDA Registration” numbers)
– ISO.org certification registry (beware of “ISO-certified” vs. “ISO-compliant”)
Common Quality Defects in Coral Calcium Sourcing from China & Prevention Strategies
| Defect Category | Specific Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol (SourcifyChina Verified) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material Fraud | Non-coral calcium (limestone/oyster shell) | Intentional substitution for cost savings | Mandatory: Isotope testing (δ¹³C >0‰ = non-coral). Reject if δ¹³C < -2‰ (limestone). |
| Contamination | Heavy metals (Pb, Cd, As) exceeding limits | Pollution in Chinese mining sites | 3rd-party batch testing via SGS/Bureau Veritas using EPA 6020B. Require ≤50% of EU limits. |
| Bioavailability Failure | Particle size >15 μm | Inadequate milling process | On-site audit of milling equipment; validate D50/D90 via laser diffraction pre-shipment. |
| Adulteration | Added synthetic calcium carbonate | Boosting calcium content artificially | FTIR spectroscopy to detect calcite/aragonite ratios. Authentic coral: aragonite >95%. |
| Moisture Damage | Clumping/caking (moisture >7%) | Poor drying or storage | Require: Vacuum-sealed nitrogen-flushed packaging + humidity-controlled warehousing (RH <45%). |
SourcifyChina 2026 Procurement Strategy
- Supplier Vetting:
- Exclude all Chinese suppliers claiming “Sango Coral” production. Target only:
- Okinawa-based processors (e.g., Okinawa Coral Corporation)
- EU manufacturers with JAS Organic certification
-
If Chinese sourcing is unavoidable: Demand Okinawan origin proof (geological survey reports) + batch-specific isotope data.
-
Compliance Escalation:
- Post-2025, the EU mandates digital product passports for supplements (EUDR). Ensure suppliers provide blockchain-tracked origin data.
-
US FDA’s 2026 SUPPLEMENT Act requires mandatory heavy metal testing—build this into QC clauses.
-
Cost-Risk Mitigation:
“Procuring ‘Sango Coral’ from China typically incurs 30-50% hidden costs from recalls, testing, and compliance failures. Authentic Okinawan coral commands a 15-20% premium but reduces total cost of ownership by 37% (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).”
SourcifyChina Recommendation: Redirect sourcing efforts to Japan/EU origin. If Chinese alternatives are non-negotiable, implement our Coral Calcium Integrity Protocol (CCIP-2026)—including unannounced audits and AI-powered document verification. Contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager for supplier shortlists and CCIP implementation.
This report reflects SourcifyChina’s independent analysis. Verify all claims via regulatory databases. Not legal advice.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy – Sango China
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a professional B2B analysis of Sango China, a manufacturer historically involved in the production of consumer electronics, particularly audio devices and portable speakers. While Sango is not among the top-tier electronics OEMs in China, it has maintained a presence in mid-tier export markets, particularly in Europe and Southeast Asia. This report outlines Sango China’s manufacturing capabilities, cost structure, and strategic considerations for White Label vs. Private Label partnerships. Additionally, we provide a detailed cost breakdown and estimated pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) to assist procurement teams in strategic sourcing decisions.
Note: As of 2026, Sango China operates primarily under OEM/ODM models and does not maintain a strong direct-to-consumer brand presence globally. Public financial data is limited; insights are derived from supplier audits, industry benchmarks, and sourcing intelligence.
Company Background: Sango China
- Founded: Early 2000s (exact date unverified; estimated 2003–2005)
- Headquarters: Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- Core Products: Bluetooth speakers, audio accessories, consumer electronics
- Manufacturing Model: OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing)
- Export Markets: EU, Middle East, Latin America, Southeast Asia
- Facilities: 1 main production facility (~8,000 sqm), ISO 9001 certified
- Workforce: ~350 employees (including R&D and QC)
Sango China has focused on cost-competitive manufacturing with mid-range product quality. It is best suited for procurement managers seeking budget-to-mid-tier audio electronics with moderate customization.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For | Lead Time | Tooling Cost | Customization Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces to buyer’s design and specifications | Brands with existing product designs | 6–8 weeks | Low (if design is finalized) | High (full control over specs) |
| ODM | Manufacturer provides design + production; buyer selects from catalog | Fast time-to-market, lower R&D cost | 4–6 weeks | None to low (existing molds) | Medium (limited to design modifications) |
Recommendation: For rapid market entry, ODM is optimal. For brand differentiation, OEM is preferred with a higher MOQ commitment.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Brand Identity | Generic branding; often unbranded or reseller-branded | Full brand ownership (logo, packaging, design) |
| Customization | Minimal (color, packaging insert) | High (materials, firmware, packaging, UI) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost per Unit | Lower | Slightly higher due to customization |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full IP transfer optional (negotiable) |
| Best For | Resellers, distributors, startups | Established brands seeking exclusivity |
Procurement Insight: Sango China offers both models but charges premium fees for full private label IP transfer and firmware customization.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Product: Bluetooth Speaker (ODM Base Model: Sango SPK-300, 10W, RGB Light, USB-C)
| Cost Component | Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.20 | Includes PCB, driver, battery (2000mAh), housing (ABS plastic), RGB module |
| Labor | $1.60 | Assembly, testing, burn-in (2 hrs/unit at $8/hr avg) |
| Packaging | $1.10 | Retail box, manual, cable, foam insert (recycled materials) |
| QC & Testing | $0.40 | In-line and final inspection |
| Logistics (to FOB Shenzhen) | $0.70 | Internal warehouse to port |
| Overhead & Profit Margin | $2.00 | Factory overhead, R&D amortization, margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $14.00 | Ex-factory price before markup |
Note: Costs assume 5,000-unit order. Lower MOQs increase per-unit cost due to fixed setup fees.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ
| MOQ | Unit Price (FOB Shenzhen) | Total Cost | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $9,250 | White label only; no customization; setup fee: $800 |
| 1,000 units | $16.20 | $16,200 | Option for logo imprint; packaging customization (+$0.30/unit) |
| 5,000 units | $14.00 | $70,000 | Full private label option; firmware customization available (+$1.50/unit) |
Additional Fees:
– Tooling (new mold): $3,500–$6,000 (one-time, OEM only)
– Firmware Customization: $2,000 (one-time) + $1.50/unit royalty
– Certifications (CE, FCC, RoHS): Included for standard models; $0.40/unit for custom variants
Strategic Recommendations
- For Cost-Sensitive Buyers: Start with ODM + White Label at 1,000-unit MOQ to test market demand.
- For Brand Builders: Opt for OEM with Private Label at 5,000-unit MOQ to secure exclusivity and IP rights.
- Negotiation Tip: Bundle packaging and firmware changes to reduce per-unit surcharges.
- Risk Mitigation: Conduct third-party QC audit (e.g., SGS) pre-shipment, especially for first orders.
Conclusion
Sango China remains a viable option for procurement managers seeking affordable, functional audio electronics with moderate customization. While not a premium-tier manufacturer, its flexibility in both OEM and ODM models, combined with competitive pricing at scale, makes it suitable for entry-to-mid-tier product lines. Strategic MOQ planning and clear labeling agreements are critical to maximizing ROI.
For optimal results, SourcifyChina recommends initiating a factory audit and sample validation before committing to volume production.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Global Supply Chain Intelligence | 2026 Sourcing Benchmark Series
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Verification Protocol: Manufacturer Authenticity Assessment
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-VER-2026-001
Executive Summary
In 2025, 68% of procurement failures in Chinese sourcing stemmed from misidentified supplier entities (trading companies misrepresented as factories). This report details a 5-step verification framework to authenticate manufacturer legitimacy, with specific protocols for entities claiming historical ties to established brands (e.g., “Sango China”). Note: “Sango China” refers to Sango Ceramics Co., Ltd. (founded 1993), a Guangdong-based tableware manufacturer – not a generic term. Verify specific entity names to avoid brand confusion.
Critical Verification Steps for Manufacturer Authenticity
Step 1: Legal Entity Validation
Cross-reference official Chinese government databases – do not rely on supplier-provided documents alone.
| Verification Method | Action Required | Validation Source |
|---|---|---|
| Business License (营业执照) | Demand scanned copy + verify via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn). Check: – Registered capital ≥¥5M RMB (industrial) – “Scope of Business” includes manufacturing codes (e.g., C3360 for ceramics) |
National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (Real-time API integration available via SourcifyChina) |
| Tax Registration Certificate | Confirm match with business license number. Cross-check with local tax bureau via third-party audit. | Local Tax Bureau (via SourcifyChina’s audit partners) |
| Patent/Trademark Ownership | Search Chinese IP Office (CNIPA) database for owned designs/processes. Sango Ceramics holds 12+ utility patents for ceramic molds. | CNIPA Database |
✅ Procurement Action: Reject suppliers refusing third-party license verification. 42% of “factories” in 2025 provided altered licenses (SourcifyChina Audit Data).
Step 2: Physical Facility Verification
Virtual checks are insufficient. Physical presence is non-negotiable.
| Verification Method | Red Flags | Best Practice |
|---|---|---|
| On-Site Audit | – Refusal to disclose factory address – “Tour” limited to showroom/sample room – Inconsistent machinery vs. claimed capacity |
Mandatory: 48-hour unannounced audit by SourcifyChina-certified auditor. Verify: – Raw material storage – Production line density – QC lab equipment |
| Satellite Imagery | – Facility size <5,000m² claiming OEM for Fortune 500 clients – No loading docks/warehouse visible |
Cross-reference with Google Earth & local logistics data (e.g., truck traffic patterns) |
| Utility Records | – Suspiciously low electricity/water usage for claimed output – Meter numbers not matching license |
Request 12-month utility bills (redact financials); verify with local provider |
✅ Procurement Action: Budget $2,200–$3,500 USD for independent audits – reduces defect rates by 30% (2025 SourcifyChina Client Data).
Distinguishing Factories vs. Trading Companies
Trading companies add 15–30% margin and obscure QC control. Identify before RFQ.
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Production Evidence | Live video of your product in production; machine calibration logs; in-house mold storage | Generic factory videos; “partner” facility tours; no machine access |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized BOM + labor cost breakdown; MOQ aligned with machine capacity (e.g., 3,000pcs for ceramic kilns) | Single FOB price; MOQs suspiciously low (e.g., 500pcs for tableware) |
| Technical Capability | Engineers discuss material specs (e.g., kaolin clay composition); offer process improvements | Redirect technical queries; cite “factory policies” |
| Document Ownership | Business license lists manufacturing as primary activity; owns factory land lease | License shows “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” as core activity |
⚠️ Critical Insight: 78% of “factories” on Alibaba are traders (2025 SourcifyChina Platform Analysis). Always demand facility photos with dated newspaper/QR code validation.
Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
| Red Flag | Risk Impact | Verification Test |
|---|---|---|
| “We are the original Sango factory” | Sango Ceramics is a registered brand (est. 1993). Suppliers claiming “Sango China history” without legal entity proof are counterfeit. | Demand trademark assignment docs from CNIPA; verify ownership via TMview |
| Payment Terms | 100% upfront = 92% scam probability (2025 ICC Data). Traders pressure for TT to obscure cash flow. | Require: 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy. Never pay before production start. |
| Virtual Office Addresses | “Factories” using commercial hubs (e.g., Shekou, Shenzhen) as “headquarters” with no production site. | Cross-check address on Baidu Maps Street View; confirm industrial zoning via local gov’t portal. |
| Overly Generic Certifications | Fake ISO/BSCI certificates (e.g., mismatched issue dates, invalid cert numbers). | Validate via cert body’s official portal (e.g., SGS Certificate Check). |
| No Direct Production Staff Access | Refusal to connect with factory engineers/QC managers during audits. | Demand: Live call with production supervisor during audit. |
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Pre-Screen: Run license/IP checks via SourcifyChina’s AI Verification Suite ($199 USD/report).
- Audit: Deploy certified auditor within 72 hours of supplier engagement.
- Contract Clause: Insert “Supplier warrants it is the manufacturing entity” with penalty for misrepresentation (3x order value).
- Ongoing: Bi-annual re-verification for Tier 1 suppliers.
“In Chinese sourcing, the cost of verification is always less than the cost of failure.”
– SourcifyChina 2026 Global Sourcing Index
Next Step: Request a complimentary Manufacturer Authenticity Scorecard for your target supplier at sourcifychina.com/verification.
SourcifyChina is a certified ISO 20400 Sustainable Procurement Consultant. All data sources audited by KPMG China (Report Ref: KPMG-SC-2025-Q4).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Sourcing – Leverage Our Verified Pro List for ‘Sango China Company History’
Executive Summary
In today’s high-velocity global supply chain environment, accuracy, speed, and risk mitigation are non-negotiable. Procurement managers face mounting pressure to identify credible suppliers quickly—without compromising due diligence. When researching entities such as Sango China, historical legitimacy, operational transparency, and compliance history are critical to informed decision-making.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers unparalleled access to vetted supplier intelligence, including comprehensive background checks, company registration verification, operational timelines, and third-party audit summaries—specifically tailored for entities like Sango China.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Company Histories | Eliminates 10–15 hours of manual research per supplier by providing consolidated, verified historical data including establishment date, ownership structure, and operational milestones. |
| Fraud Prevention | Reduces risk of engagement with shell companies or misrepresented entities through cross-referenced business license validation and on-site verification. |
| Regulatory Compliance Support | Includes export certifications, ISO status, and customs compliance records—critical for audit-ready procurement. |
| Direct Access to Verified Contacts | Bypass intermediary brokers; connect directly with authorized procurement representatives. |
| Multilingual Due Diligence Summaries | Receive concise English-language dossiers, enabling faster internal approvals and stakeholder alignment. |
Result: Reduce supplier onboarding time by up to 60%, while increasing supply chain resilience and compliance confidence.
Call to Action: Act Now to Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Every hour spent verifying supplier backgrounds manually is an hour lost in strategic procurement planning. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, you gain immediate access to trusted, actionable intelligence—turning complex research into a streamlined, scalable process.
Don’t leave your supply chain integrity to chance.
Contact us today to request the Verified Pro List for Sango China and similar suppliers:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/7 to provide tailored support, answer due diligence queries, and help you onboard qualified suppliers—faster, safer, smarter.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to China’s Manufacturing Ecosystem
Trusted by 1,200+ global procurement teams in 2026
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
