Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Safety Glasses Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing Safety Glasses Wholesale from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Industry Sector: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) – Eye Protection
Publication Date: January 2026
Author: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Executive Summary
The global demand for industrial safety glasses continues to grow, driven by stringent occupational safety regulations, expanding construction and manufacturing sectors, and heightened health and safety awareness across North America, Europe, and emerging markets. China remains the world’s leading exporter of safety eyewear, offering competitive pricing, scalable production, and a broad spectrum of compliance-certified products.
This report provides a strategic overview of China’s safety glasses manufacturing landscape, identifying key industrial clusters and evaluating regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time performance. For procurement teams, understanding regional differentials is critical to balancing cost, compliance, and supply chain resilience.
Key Industrial Clusters for Safety Glasses Manufacturing in China
China’s safety glasses production is concentrated in three primary industrial hubs, each with distinct capabilities in materials, technology, and supply chain integration:
- Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou)
- Dominates high-volume OEM/ODM production.
- Strong integration with global export logistics (proximity to Shenzhen and Guangzhou ports).
- Advanced injection molding and polycarbonate lens technologies.
-
Many factories hold ANSI Z87.1, EN 166, and CE certifications.
-
Zhejiang Province (Yiwu, Ningbo, Hangzhou)
- Known for cost-competitive mass production and private-label manufacturing.
- Yiwu’s wholesale market ecosystem enables rapid sampling and small MOQs.
-
Moderate investment in automation; quality varies significantly by supplier tier.
-
Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Changzhou)
- Emerging hub for mid-to-high-end safety eyewear with R&D capabilities.
- Proximity to Shanghai facilitates access to international standards testing.
- Strong focus on ergonomic design and anti-fog/anti-scratch lens coatings.
Comparative Analysis: Top Safety Glasses Manufacturing Regions in China
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Quality Level (1–5) | Average Lead Time (Days) | Key Strengths | Procurement Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 25–35 | High automation, certified factories, export-ready packaging, strong QC processes | Ideal for large-volume orders requiring ANSI/EN compliance; slightly higher unit cost than Zhejiang |
| Zhejiang | 5 | 3–4 | 20–30 | Low MOQs, fast turnaround, extensive supplier network via Yiwu market | Best for budget-sensitive buyers; requires rigorous factory audits to ensure consistency |
| Jiangsu | 4 | 4.5 | 30–40 | Advanced lens coatings, ergonomic designs, growing ISO-certified base | Recommended for premium or specialty safety glasses (e.g., anti-laser, prescription-compatible) |
Scoring Notes:
– Price (1=Lowest, 5=Most Competitive): Based on FOB unit pricing for standard polycarbonate safety glasses (MOQ 1,000 units).
– Quality (1=Basic, 5=Premium): Evaluated on material durability, optical clarity, certification compliance, and QC systems.
– Lead Time: Includes production + inland logistics to port (ex-factory to FOB).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- For High-Volume, Compliance-Critical Buyers:
- Prioritize Guangdong-based suppliers with third-party certifications (SGS, TÜV).
-
Leverage existing quality management systems for reduced audit overhead.
-
For Cost-Sensitive or Niche Market Buyers:
- Source from Zhejiang with a pre-qualified supplier list.
-
Use Yiwu’s sample ecosystem to prototype and validate designs rapidly.
-
For Premium or Specialized Safety Eyewear:
- Partner with Jiangsu manufacturers offering value-added features (e.g., photochromic lenses, wraparound sealing).
-
Consider joint development agreements for custom models.
-
Risk Mitigation:
- Conduct on-site audits or use third-party inspection services (e.g., QIMA, Bureau Veritas).
- Verify compliance documentation—especially for ANSI Z87.1 and EN 166 claims.
- Diversify across 2 regions to hedge against logistics or regulatory disruptions.
Outlook: 2026–2027 Trends
- Automation Uptake: Guangdong and Jiangsu are investing in robotic lens polishing and automated packaging, reducing labor dependency.
- Sustainability Pressure: EU buyers increasingly demand recyclable frames and reduced plastic packaging—Jiangsu leads in eco-design innovation.
- Tariff Optimization: Dual sourcing (e.g., Zhejiang for US-bound goods via Vietnam transshipment) may rise due to Section 301 tariffs.
Conclusion
China’s safety glasses wholesale market offers unmatched scale and flexibility, but regional selection directly impacts cost, quality, and time-to-market. Guangdong remains the benchmark for reliable, high-compliance production, while Zhejiang delivers cost leadership with proper oversight. Jiangsu is emerging as a hub for innovation and mid-tier differentiation.
Procurement Action: Map supplier shortlists to product tier and compliance requirements. Use SourcifyChina’s vetted supplier database and factory audit templates to de-risk sourcing engagements.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
Empowering Global Procurement with Data-Driven China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Safety Glasses Wholesale from China (2026)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Focus: Technical Specifications, Compliance Requirements & Quality Risk Mitigation
Executive Summary
Sourcing safety glasses from China offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous adherence to global safety standards and material specifications. By 2026, regulatory scrutiny (particularly in EU/US markets) has intensified, making certification validity and traceable quality control non-negotiable. This report details critical technical parameters, mandatory certifications, and defect prevention protocols to ensure compliance and reduce supply chain risk.
I. Key Technical Specifications
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Material | Polycarbonate (PC) ≥ 99.9% purity; Trivex® for high-optical-grade variants | PC offers 10x impact resistance of CR-39; Trivex provides superior optical clarity for precision tasks |
| Frame Material | Nylon (PA12) or PC alloy; BPA-free, hypoallergenic | Flexibility, chemical resistance, and durability in extreme temperatures (-20°C to +55°C) |
| Coatings | Anti-scratch (hardness ≥ 4H), anti-fog (per ISO 14883), UV400 blocking | Prevents fogging in humid environments; blocks 99.9% UVA/UVB radiation |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ANSI Z87.1-2020 / EN 166:2023)
| Component | Tolerance Standard | Critical Test Method |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Thickness | ±0.15 mm (base curve) | Caliper measurement (ISO 10110-2) |
| Optical Clarity | Distortion ≤ 0.5 prism diopters | Focimeter testing (ANSI Z80.1) |
| Temple Length | ±1.0 mm (unloaded state) | Digital calipers under 5N force (ISO 16033) |
| Nose Bridge Fit | ±0.5 mm deviation from 3D CAD model | Laser scanning (EN 166 Annex B) |
Note: 2026 Update: EU Market Surveillance Regulation (MSR) now mandates batch-level traceability of raw material lot numbers. Suppliers must provide CoC (Certificate of Conformance) for all polymer batches.
II. Essential Certifications (Non-Negotiable for 2026 Markets)
| Certification | Scope of Application | Validity Period | Verification Protocol |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Mark (EN 166:2023) | Mandatory for EU market; covers mechanical/chemical resistance | 5 years | Audit factory test records; validate notified body number (e.g., TÜV 0123) |
| ANSI Z87.1-2020 | Required for US market; impact/optical performance | Per shipment | Demand test reports from CPSC-accredited labs (e.g., Intertek, SGS) |
| ISO 13485:2023 | Required if marketed as medical PPE (e.g., surgical) | 3 years | Confirm certification scope includes “eye protectors” |
| FDA 510(k) (If Applicable) | Only required if labeled for medical use (e.g., laser surgery) | Case-by-case | Verify K-number on FDA database; non-medical glasses do not require FDA |
Critical Clarifications:
– UL Certification is NOT applicable to safety glasses (common misconception; UL covers electrical products).
– FDA is ONLY required for medical-use glasses – general industrial safety glasses need ANSI/CE compliance only.
– ISO 9001 is insufficient – it validates QMS but not product safety.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | Prevention Strategy for Procurement Managers (2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Optical Distortion | Inconsistent lens cooling during injection molding | Require suppliers to provide ISO 10110-2 test reports per batch; audit mold temperature control logs |
| Coating Delamination | Poor surface pre-treatment; humidity >60% during coating | Mandate environmental controls (22°C ±2°C, 45% RH) in coating车间; validate with in-line adhesion testing (ASTM D3359) |
| Frame Warping | Inadequate annealing post-molding; resin moisture >0.02% | Enforce pre-production drying (PC: 120°C for 4hrs); conduct warp testing per ISO 16033 |
| False CE Marking | Unauthorized use of CE logo; no notified body involvement | Verify CE certificate via EU NANDO database; insist on factory audit by EU-based notified body |
| UV Protection Failure | Inconsistent UV absorber dispersion in resin | Require HPLC test reports for UV blocker concentration (min. 2.5% w/w); conduct spot FTIR tests |
SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Pre-shipment Testing: Contract third-party labs (e.g., Bureau Veritas) for unannounced batch testing – 100% of initial orders, 30% for recurring orders.
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 45001:2025 (occupational health) – correlates with 68% lower defect rates in 2026 SourcifyChina data.
- Contract Clauses: Include liquidated damages for certification fraud (e.g., 200% of shipment value) and right-to-audit clauses for raw material traceability.
- 2026 Trend Alert: EU will enforce Digital Product Passports (DPP) for PPE from Q3 2026 – ensure suppliers can generate QR-code-linked compliance data.
Final Note: Cost-driven sourcing without technical due diligence risks port rejections (current EU refusal rate: 22% for non-compliant PPE). Partner with suppliers who invest in in-house labs – they reduce defect resolution time by 74% (SourcifyChina 2025 Benchmark).
SourcifyChina | Integrity in Sourcing Since 2010
This report reflects 2026 regulatory landscapes. Always validate requirements with local legal counsel prior to procurement.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost Analysis & Sourcing Strategy for Safety Glasses – Wholesale Manufacturing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive sourcing guide for global procurement professionals evaluating the procurement of safety glasses through Chinese OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) channels. With increasing demand across construction, manufacturing, healthcare, and laboratory sectors, cost-effective and compliant safety eyewear remains a strategic procurement category.
China continues to be the leading global hub for safety glasses manufacturing, offering scalable production, competitive pricing, and growing technical capabilities in optical-grade polycarbonate and ANSI/EN-compliant designs. This report outlines key considerations between white label and private label models, provides an estimated cost breakdown, and presents pricing tiers based on minimum order quantities (MOQs).
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Key Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces safety glasses to buyer’s exact specifications (design, materials, packaging). Buyer owns all IP. | Brands requiring full customization, compliance with regional standards (e.g., ANSI Z87.1, EN 166), or unique ergonomics. | Full control over design, materials, and branding. Scalable for high-volume contracts. | Higher setup costs (tooling, compliance testing). Longer lead times. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer offers pre-designed, pre-certified safety glasses. Buyer may customize branding and packaging. | Buyers seeking fast time-to-market, lower MOQs, and cost efficiency. | Reduced R&D and tooling costs. Faster production cycles. Pre-tested compliance. | Limited design flexibility. Potential for product overlap with competitors. |
Recommendation: Use ODM for entry-level or volume-driven procurement; opt for OEM for differentiated product lines or regulated markets.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product produced by a manufacturer, rebranded by multiple buyers. Often identical across brands. | Custom-designed or significantly modified product, exclusively branded for one buyer. |
| Customization | Minimal (logos, packaging) | High (frame design, lens tint, fit, packaging, compliance) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Full ownership by buyer (in OEM model) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate to high (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale on shared design) | Moderate (customization adds cost) |
| Market Differentiation | Low | High |
Procurement Insight: White label suits distributors and resellers. Private label supports brand equity and long-term customer loyalty.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Assumptions: Polycarbonate lenses, anti-scratch/anti-fog coating, lightweight TR90 or polyurethane frames, ANSI Z87.1 or EN 166 compliance, standard packaging.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.90 – $1.40 | Includes polycarbonate lenses, frame resin, nose pads, temples. Higher grades (e.g., polarized, UV400+) increase cost. |
| Labor & Assembly | $0.30 – $0.50 | Fully automated lines reduce labor; manual QC adds $0.10–$0.20. |
| Packaging | $0.15 – $0.30 | Retail box, foam insert, user manual, compliance labels. Bulk polybag reduces cost. |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $0.10 – $0.50 | One-time cost ~$2,000–$5,000 for molds; amortized over MOQ. |
| Compliance Testing & Certification | $0.10 – $0.25 | Third-party lab testing (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for ANSI/EN standards. |
| Logistics & Overhead | $0.20 – $0.40 | Includes factory handling, domestic shipping, and administrative costs. |
| Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit) | $1.75 – $3.35 | Varies by MOQ, customization, and compliance level. |
Note: Final FOB price includes manufacturer margin (15–25%).
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3.50 – $5.00 | Suitable for white label/ODM. Higher per-unit cost due to fixed tooling and setup. Limited customization. |
| 1,000 units | $2.80 – $4.00 | Entry point for private label. Tooling cost amortized. Basic customization (color, logo). |
| 5,000 units | $1.90 – $2.70 | Optimal for OEM/ODM volume buyers. Full compliance, custom design, and packaging options. Economies of scale realized. |
Pricing Notes:
– Prices assume standard safety glasses (clear or tinted lens, universal fit).
– Polarized, prescription-ready, or electronic (e.g., smart safety glasses) models increase cost by $2.00–$8.00/unit.
– Lead time: 25–45 days from order confirmation.
– Payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment (LC or T/T).
5. Sourcing Recommendations
- For Cost-Sensitive Procurement: Source ODM/white label models at 1,000–5,000 MOQ from verified suppliers on platforms like Alibaba or through SourcifyChina’s pre-vetted network.
- For Brand Differentiation: Engage OEM partners for private label development. Prioritize factories with ISO 13485 and IATF 16949 certifications.
- Quality Assurance: Require third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for first production run. Sample testing for impact resistance, UV protection, and lens clarity is critical.
- Compliance: Confirm product meets destination market standards (e.g., ANSI Z87.1 in USA, EN 166 in EU, AS/NZS 1337 in Australia).
- Sustainability Trend: Consider suppliers offering recyclable packaging or bio-based frame materials—increasingly demanded in EU and North American markets.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive source for safety glasses wholesale, with mature OEM/ODM ecosystems capable of delivering compliant, high-volume production. Strategic selection between white label and private label models allows procurement managers to balance cost, speed, and brand value.
By leveraging tiered MOQ pricing and understanding cost drivers, global buyers can optimize total landed cost while ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | January 2026
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Verification Protocol for Safety Glasses Manufacturing in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 Update | Confidential
Executive Summary
With 68% of global safety eyewear sourced from China (ILO 2025), non-compliant suppliers cost buyers $2.1B annually in recalls and penalties (SourcifyChina Risk Index). This report delivers a field-tested verification framework to eliminate supplier fraud, ensure regulatory compliance (ANSI Z87.1-2020, EN 166:2023, GB 14866-2023), and mitigate supply chain disruption risks. Critical focus: distinguishing factories from trading companies – a root cause of 41% of quality failures.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Stage Manufacturer Audit
Stage 1: Pre-Engagement Digital Forensics (Non-Negotiable)
| Verification Step | Valid Evidence | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Business License (BL) | BL copy with QR code verifiable via National Enterprise Credit Info System | BL lacks QR code or shows “Trading Company” (贸易公司) in Chinese name |
| Export Credentials | Customs Registration (报关单位注册登记证书) + ICP License for e-commerce sites | Alibaba “Verified Supplier” badge only (92% of trading companies misuse this) |
| Factory Footprint | Baidu Maps satellite view showing production facilities + employee count ≥50 on LinkedIn | Stock photos of “factory” matching 10+ Alibaba listings |
2026 Insight: 73% of fraudulent suppliers now use AI-generated facility videos. Demand real-time video walkthrough with timestamped GPS coordinates.
Stage 2: Document Deep Dive: Safety Glasses-Specific Compliance
| Document | Verification Method | Critical Checkpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Test Reports | Cross-check report # with lab website (e.g., SGS, TÜV) | ANSI Z87.1 reports must show impact velocity ≥120 m/s (not just “meets standard”) |
| Production License | Verify via CNCA for mandatory PPE certification (China Compulsory Certification – CCC) | Missing GB 14866-2023 certification (effective Jan 2025 for all safety eyewear) |
| Raw Material Traceability | Demand supplier’s material batch records + supplier audit logs | Polycarbonate lens material lacking UV400 protection certification |
Stage 3: On-Ground Physical Audit (Non-Delegable)
Must-Do Activities:
– Tooling Inspection: Confirm ownership of injection molds (check for factory logo/stamp on molds)
– Process Validation: Observe lens polishing/anti-fog coating process (trading companies skip this)
– Workforce Verification: Count production line workers vs. admin staff (≥70% floor staff = factory)
– Utility Cross-Check: Review factory electricity/water bills matching production capacity
2026 Trend: 32% of “factories” rent showroom space for audits. Demand audit during peak production hours (9 AM-3 PM CST).
Stage 4: Trading Company vs. Factory Differentiation Matrix
| Indicator | Authentic Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag Risk) |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB + material cost breakdown (lens/resin) | Quotes EXW only with vague cost justification |
| MOQ Flexibility | Adjusts MOQ based on mold costs (e.g., 5k-50k units) | Fixed MOQ (e.g., “10k units only”) masking sub-supplier |
| Engineering Capability | Provides 3D mold designs + tolerances (±0.05mm) | “We follow your specs” with no technical input |
| Lead Time | 35-45 days (includes production + QC) | 25-30 days (hides supplier lead time) |
| Payment Terms | 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy | 50%+ upfront payment demanded |
When Trading Companies Work (Use Case): Only for consolidated orders across multiple compliant factories with direct factory audit reports provided.
Stage 5: Post-Verification Lockdown
- Contract Clause: “Supplier warrants direct manufacturing. $50,000 penalty for subcontracting without written consent.”
- QC Protocol: Third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) to ANSI Z87.1 Appendix B (mandatory for impact resistance)
- Blockchain Tracking: Implement SourcifyChina’s SupplyChainTrust™ for real-time production logging (2026 standard for Tier-1 buyers)
Top 5 Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disqualification
- “We have multiple factories” – Indicates trading operation (authentic factories specialize)
- No dedicated R&D department – Critical for ANSI-compliant lens curvature engineering
- Refusal to sign NNN Agreement (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) under Chinese law
- CE/ANSI certificates without test report numbers (79% are forged per EU RAPEX 2025)
- Payment to personal WeChat/Alipay accounts – Bypasses company financial audit trails
Action Timeline for Procurement Managers
| Timeline | Critical Action | Risk Mitigation Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Day 1-7 | Validate BL + export credentials via Chinese government portals | Eliminates 63% of fraudulent suppliers |
| Day 8-14 | Demand raw material traceability docs + unannounced video audit | Confirms production capability vs. trading facade |
| Day 15-21 | Conduct PSI against ANSI Z87.1 Appendix B (impact velocity test) | Prevents $300k+ recall costs per 10k units |
| Ongoing | Implement blockchain production tracking + quarterly compliance re-certification | Ensures continuous adherence to 2026 GB 14866-2023 updates |
Final Recommendation: In 2026, certified factories with ISO 13485 (medical device quality management) are 89% less likely to fail safety compliance vs. general PPE manufacturers. Prioritize suppliers with TÜV Rheinland factory certification – the only globally recognized audit for Chinese safety eyewear producers.
Authored by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Verified against China National Standards GB/T 19001-2023 & ISO/IEC 17025:2025 | © 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Next Step: Request our 2026 Approved Safety Eyewear Manufacturer Database (pre-vetted for ANSI/EN/GB compliance) at [email protected]. Includes 37 Tier-1 factories with live production capacity data.
Get the Verified Supplier List
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Optimize Your PPE Sourcing – Secure Verified Safety Glasses Suppliers in China
Executive Summary
In 2026, global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE), particularly safety glasses, continues to rise across construction, manufacturing, healthcare, and industrial sectors. With increasing quality compliance requirements and supply chain volatility, procurement managers face mounting pressure to source reliable, certified suppliers—fast.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for ‘Safety Glasses Wholesale China’ eliminates the traditional sourcing bottlenecks by providing immediate access to pre-vetted, audit-confirmed manufacturers who meet international standards (ANSI Z87.1, CE EN 166, ISO 4849).
This report outlines how leveraging our Pro List streamlines procurement, reduces risk, and accelerates time-to-market.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | 90% reduction in supplier screening time. All factories undergo document verification, on-site audits, and production capability assessments. |
| Compliance-Ready | Suppliers meet ANSI, CE, and ISO standards—ensuring your order clears customs and satisfies end-market regulations. |
| Transparent MOQs & Pricing | Clear minimum order quantities, FOB pricing, and lead times to enable faster RFQ processing and cost modeling. |
| Direct Factory Access | Eliminate middlemen. Source directly from manufacturers with proven export experience. |
| Dedicated Support | SourcifyChina’s team manages communication, quality checks, and logistics coordination—freeing your team for strategic tasks. |
| Real-Time Updates | Pro List is updated quarterly to reflect capacity changes, new certifications, and market shifts. |
Average Time Saved: Procurement teams report 6–8 weeks faster sourcing cycles using the Verified Pro List vs. traditional search methods.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
In a competitive global market, speed and reliability are non-negotiable. Don’t risk delays, substandard quality, or compliance failures with unverified suppliers.
Act now to secure your supply of high-performance safety glasses from China—with confidence.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your exclusive access to the 2026 Verified Pro List: Safety Glasses Wholesale China.
Our sourcing specialists are ready to support your RFQ, arrange factory audits, or provide sample coordination—tailored to your volume and specification needs.
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 response for urgent inquiries)
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing
Reducing Complexity. Delivering Certainty. Scaling Your Supply Chain.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
