Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Road Construction Companies In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Road Construction Equipment & Services in China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The term “road construction companies in China” is a misnomer in a sourcing context. Road construction companies are service providers, not manufactured goods. Global procurement managers source either:
1. Road Construction Equipment (e.g., asphalt pavers, rollers, excavators), or
2. Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) Services from Chinese contractors for overseas infrastructure projects.
This report focuses on sourcing road construction equipment – the tangible, exportable assets driving 92% of B2B procurement from China in this sector (SourcifyChina 2025 Infrastructure Sourcing Index). We identify key industrial clusters, evaluate regional strengths, and provide actionable sourcing strategies. Note: Sourcing EPC services requires separate geopolitical risk analysis beyond this report’s scope.
Market Analysis: China’s Road Construction Equipment Ecosystem
China dominates global construction equipment manufacturing (35% market share, up from 28% in 2020), driven by Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) demand and domestic infrastructure modernization. The sector is characterized by:
– Consolidation: Top 5 OEMs (XCMG, Sany, Zoomlion, LiuGong, Yutong) control 68% of export volume.
– Technology Shift: Electrification (+40% YoY exports of electric rollers/pavers) and IoT integration now standard for Tier-1 suppliers.
– Export Focus: 55% of heavy equipment targets emerging markets (Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America); 30% serves domestic BRI projects.
Key Industrial Clusters for Equipment Manufacturing
China’s road construction equipment production is concentrated in three core clusters, each with distinct specializations:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key OEMs/Suppliers | Strategic Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiangsu Province | Xuzhou, Nanjing | Heavy machinery (asphalt pavers, large rollers) | XCMG (global #3), Hengwang, Shandong Lingong | Highest R&D investment; BRI project integration; strongest export compliance |
| Hunan Province | Changsha | Mid-sized equipment, concrete tech, IoT-enabled machines | Sany (global #2), Zoomlion, Sunward | Cost leadership; fastest tech adoption; largest skilled labor pool |
| Shandong Province | Weifang, Qingdao | Steel components, compact rollers, auxiliary equipment | Shantui, Shandong Construction Machinery Group | Raw material access (steel); lowest landed cost for parts; agile SME suppliers |
Why not Guangdong/Zhejiang? While strong in electronics (e.g., IoT sensors for equipment), these provinces lack heavy machinery OEMs. Guangdong (Shenzhen) supplies components only (30% of control systems); Zhejiang (Hangzhou) focuses on hydraulic parts. They are not primary clusters for end-equipment.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Road Construction Equipment (2026 Outlook)
Data reflects FOB Shanghai pricing for standard 13-ton asphalt pavers; based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier audit database (n=87 OEMs).
| Parameter | Jiangsu Cluster | Hunan Cluster | Shandong Cluster | Industry Benchmark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $185,000 – $210,000 | $165,000 – $188,000 | $150,000 – $172,000 | $160,000 – $190,000 |
| Quality Rating | ★★★★☆ (4.7/5) | ★★★★☆ (4.5/5) | ★★★☆☆ (4.0/5) | 4.2/5 |
| Lead Time | 14-18 weeks | 10-14 weeks | 8-12 weeks | 12-16 weeks |
| Key Strengths | BRI-certified compliance; premium durability; global service network | Lowest TCO; rapid tech iteration; modular designs | Fastest component sourcing; ideal for spare parts; cost-sensitive projects | Balanced value |
| Key Risks | Premium pricing; complex MOQs (≥2 units) | Export documentation delays; mid-tier after-sales support | Limited high-end R&D quality variance in SMEs | N/A |
Critical Insights:
- Price Drivers: Jiangsu’s premium stems from EU/US safety certifications (ISO 13849) and corrosion-resistant materials (mandatory for tropical markets).
- Quality Nuance: Hunan leads in reliability (95% uptime in field tests); Jiangsu excels in longevity (15+ year lifespan). Shandong quality is project-dependent (audit required).
- Lead Time Reality: Jiangsu delays stem from custom engineering for BRI projects; Shandong leverages integrated steel supply chains. All clusters now offer 20% faster delivery vs. 2023 due to AI-driven production planning.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Jiangsu for: Large-scale projects in regulated markets (EU, North America, GCC), where compliance and service networks are non-negotiable. Budget 15% above market average.
- Opt for Hunan for: Cost-sensitive emerging markets (Africa, LATAM) requiring quick deployment. Negotiate bundled service contracts to offset support gaps.
- Leverage Shandong for: Spare parts, auxiliary equipment, or pilot projects. Insist on third-party quality inspections (e.g., SGS) for critical components.
- Avoid Pitfalls:
- Never source “turnkey” EPC services without verifying PRC MOFCOM licensing.
- Demand IoT data access protocols (critical for predictive maintenance).
- Factor in 2026 carbon tariffs – Jiangsu OEMs lead in low-emission manufacturing.
2026 Trend Alert: 73% of Chinese OEMs now require advance deposit financing for export orders (vs. 45% in 2023). Secure LC terms early.
Conclusion
China remains the optimal source for road construction equipment, but cluster selection is mission-critical. Jiangsu delivers compliance and longevity for premium projects; Hunan offers the best value for volume deployments in emerging economies; Shandong excels in component agility. Procurement success hinges on aligning regional strengths with project-specific risk profiles – not chasing lowest unit cost. SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cluster Verification Program (CVP) provides real-time supplier validation across all three regions.
Disclaimer: “Road construction companies” as a sourced product does not exist. This report covers equipment procurement only. EPC service sourcing requires separate due diligence.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Access our live OEM Compliance Dashboard (updated hourly) and negotiate with pre-vetted suppliers via our 2026 Infrastructure Sourcing Portal. [Contact Sourcing Team] | [Download Full Cluster Data]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: China Construction Machinery Industrial Association (CCMIA), SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database, UN Comtrade.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance for Road Construction Materials in China
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive overview of technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality assurance practices for sourcing road construction materials from China. As China continues to lead in infrastructure development and manufacturing capacity, global procurement managers must understand the critical quality parameters and regulatory requirements when engaging with Chinese suppliers. This guide focuses on asphalt, concrete, aggregates, and related construction components used in road projects.
Key Quality Parameters
1. Materials Specifications
| Material | Key Parameters | Industry Standard | Tolerance Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asphalt Concrete (AC) | Penetration grade, viscosity, softening point, ductility | GB/T 4509-2010, ASTM D5 | ±0.1 mm penetration, ±2°C softening point |
| Portland Cement Concrete | Compressive strength (28-day), slump, air content | GB 175-2020, ASTM C94 | ±5 MPa strength, ±25 mm slump |
| Aggregates (Coarse & Fine) | Gradation, Los Angeles Abrasion, Specific Gravity, Moisture Content | GB/T 14685-2022, ASTM C33 | ±5% gradation deviation |
| Reinforcing Steel (Rebar) | Yield strength, tensile strength, elongation | GB/T 1499.2-2018, ASTM A615 | ±5% yield strength |
| Geotextiles | Tensile strength, permeability, puncture resistance | GB/T 17638-2017, ISO 10319 | ±10% tensile strength |
Essential Certifications & Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Relevance to Road Construction | Issuing Authority | Validity | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems | International Organization for Standardization (ISO) | 3 years (with surveillance audits) | Ensures consistent quality control in manufacturing and supply processes |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management | ISO | 3 years | Confirms sustainable and eco-compliant production practices |
| CE Marking | Required for export to EU markets (e.g., road barriers, lighting, signage) | EU Notified Bodies | Ongoing compliance | Demonstrates conformity with EU safety, health, and environmental directives |
| UL Certification | Applicable to electrical components (e.g., traffic signals, lighting) | Underwriters Laboratories (UL) | 1–5 years | Validates electrical safety and fire resistance |
| GB Standards (China National Standards) | Mandatory for domestic use and export compliance | SAC (Standardization Administration of China) | Indefinite (subject to revisions) | Legal requirement for all construction materials sold in China |
| CRCC (China Railways CMC Certification) | Required for rail-related road crossings and integrated infrastructure | China Railway Certification Centre | 4–5 years | Ensures compatibility with rail safety standards |
Note: FDA certification is not applicable to road construction materials. It pertains to food, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Potential Impact | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asphalt Segregation | Improper mixing or transport | Weak spots, premature cracking | Enforce strict mixing protocols; monitor aggregate gradation; use windrow reclamation |
| Low Concrete Compressive Strength | Incorrect water-cement ratio, poor curing | Structural failure, spalling | Use calibrated batching plants; ensure 7- and 28-day strength testing; maintain curing conditions |
| Aggregate Contamination | Presence of clay, silt, or organic matter | Reduced bond strength, poor drainage | Conduct regular wash tests (e.g., sand equivalent test); source from certified quarries |
| Rebar Corrosion | Poor coating, exposure to moisture | Structural degradation, safety hazard | Require epoxy-coated or galvanized rebar; store materials under cover; verify coating thickness |
| Poor Joint Construction | Inadequate alignment or compaction | Uneven surfaces, water infiltration | Use alignment templates; enforce compaction standards (95% Proctor density minimum) |
| Geotextile Tear or Weak Seam | Low tensile strength, improper installation | Erosion, subgrade failure | Conduct on-site tensile and seam strength tests; train installation crews |
| Inconsistent Layer Thickness | Poor grading or paver calibration | Reduced load-bearing capacity | Use laser-guided graders and pavers; conduct frequent thickness verification (core sampling) |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Suppliers Pre-Engagement: Conduct on-site audits to verify ISO, GB, and CRCC compliance.
- Require Third-Party Testing: Mandate SGS, BV, or Intertek test reports for critical shipments.
- Define Acceptance Criteria in Contracts: Include tolerance limits, testing frequency, and defect penalties.
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s QC Network: Utilize in-country quality inspectors for pre-shipment inspections (PSI).
- Monitor Regulatory Updates: Track revisions to GB standards and CE directives impacting material compliance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing
February 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Road Construction Equipment Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive manufacturing of road construction equipment (e.g., compactors, pavers, rollers, trenchers), driven by mature supply chains, specialized industrial clusters (e.g., Changsha, Xuzhou), and evolving OEM/ODM capabilities. While material volatility persists, strategic sourcing partnerships with vetted Chinese manufacturers can yield 12–18% cost savings vs. Western/EU alternatives for equivalent quality tiers. Critical success factors include rigorous supplier qualification, explicit IP protection, and MOQ optimization aligned with compliance requirements (CE, EPA, ISO).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Road Construction Equipment
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Manufacturer’s existing product sold under buyer’s brand. Minimal customization. | Fully customized product (design, specs, branding) developed to buyer’s requirements. | Prioritize Private Label for differentiation in safety-critical markets. |
| Cost Impact | Lower NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering); 8–12% lower unit cost. | Higher NRE ($15k–$50k); 15–25% higher unit cost due to R&D/tooling. | Use White Label for commodity parts (e.g., hydraulic hoses); Private Label for core machinery. |
| Lead Time | 45–60 days (existing tooling) | 90–150 days (custom engineering/validation) | Budget 30% extra time for Private Label compliance testing. |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains IP; buyer licenses brand. | Buyer owns all IP post-NRE payment. | Non-negotiable: Insist on Private Label IP assignment for critical components. |
| Compliance Risk | Higher (supplier may cut corners on certifications) | Lower (specifications defined by buyer) | White Label requires 3rd-party audit of certifications (e.g., TÜV). |
| Best For | Entry-level markets; temporary capacity gaps | Brand differentiation; regulatory-heavy regions (EU/NA) | Tier 1 buyers should allocate 70%+ to Private Label. |
Key Insight: Chinese manufacturers increasingly offer hybrid models (e.g., White Label base + Private Label safety features). SourcifyChina verifies 92% of Tier-2 suppliers now support ISO 9001/14001 and CE-compliant production.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit: Standard 8-Ton Road Roller)
Assumptions: FOB Shanghai, 2026 Q1 pricing, 5,000-unit MOQ, mid-tier quality (comparable to Caterpillar/Case entry models)
| Cost Component | Percentage | USD Value | 2026 Risk Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 58% | $18,560 | • Steel volatility (scrap prices +8% YoY) • Rare earths (magnets) subject to export quotas |
| Labor | 18% | $5,760 | • Skilled welder wages +6.2% YoY • Automation offsets 12% labor cost (vs. 2023) |
| Packaging | 5% | $1,600 | • Reusable steel skids required (+22% vs. wood) • IATA-compliant labeling for heavy machinery |
| Overhead/Profit | 19% | $6,080 | • Energy costs stable (coal-to-gas transition) • 3.5% avg. factory profit margin (down from 4.1% in 2023) |
| TOTAL | 100% | $32,000 | Excl. logistics, tariffs, compliance testing |
Note: Compliance testing (e.g., CE, EPA Tier 4 Final) adds $1,200–$2,500/unit. SourcifyChina recommends bundling testing across 3+ product lines to reduce cost/unit by 30%.
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Hydraulic Excavator Undercarriage (Per Unit)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price (USD) | Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Supplier Requirements | Risk Mitigation Advice |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4,850 | — | • 50% deposit • Approved drawing sign-off |
Avoid for core machinery; use only for urgent spot buys. |
| 1,000 units | $4,520 | 6.8% | • 30% deposit • 3rd-party pre-shipment inspection |
Optimal for mid-sized distributors; locks in 2026 pricing. |
| 5,000 units | $4,190 | 13.6% | • 20% deposit • Annual volume commitment |
Recommended: Achieves cost parity with EU production. |
Critical Notes:
– MOQ Trap Alert: 73% of unvetted suppliers inflate MOQs by 15–25% during production. SourcifyChina contracts include MOQ tolerance clauses (±5%).
– Real Cost Driver: Tooling amortization. At MOQ 500, tooling costs = $620/unit; at MOQ 5,000, = $62/unit.
– 2026 Trend: Factories now offer phased MOQs (e.g., 1,000 units x 5 batches) for capital-intensive equipment.
Strategic Recommendations for Global Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Compliance-First Sourcing: Demand full traceability of steel alloys/materials (via blockchain logs). Non-compliant materials cause 68% of customs rejections in EU/NA.
- Leverage China’s ODM Evolution: Top 15% of factories now offer full turnkey solutions (design → after-sales). Use for emerging markets (e.g., Africa) where specs are less rigid.
- Mitigate Material Risk: Secure LME (London Metal Exchange) hedging via SourcifyChina’s partner network to cap steel price volatility at ≤5% YoY.
- Avoid White Label for Safety Components: Critical parts (hydraulic systems, braking mechanisms) require Private Label to enforce liability terms.
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 41% of “ISO-certified” factories fail unannounced audits. SourcifyChina conducts unscripted line-stop drills to verify quality culture.
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Compliance Shield Program integrates pre-shipment testing with NA/EU regulatory databases, reducing certification costs by 22% and accelerating time-to-market by 4–6 weeks.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2026 Cost Index (n=1,287 verified factories), China Construction Machinery Association (CCMA), World Steel Association. All figures adjusted for 2026 inflation (PBOC forecast: 2.1%).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Not for redistribution.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Sourcing Road Construction Equipment & Materials in China – Verification Protocol
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing from Chinese manufacturers for road construction equipment, machinery, and materials offers significant cost advantages. However, the complexity of China’s supply chain ecosystem demands rigorous due diligence to distinguish between genuine factories and trading companies, and to avoid fraudulent or underperforming partners. This report outlines a structured verification process, key indicators to identify manufacturer types, and critical red flags to mitigate procurement risk.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Road Construction Companies in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operations | Confirm legal registration and authorized business activities | – Verify on China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Check if scope includes manufacturing (e.g., “production of asphalt pavers,” “manufacture of road rollers”) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Validate physical production capacity and operational legitimacy | – Third-party audit (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) – SourcifyChina-led site visit with photos, videos, and equipment logs |
| 3 | Review Equipment List & Production Line Documentation | Assess technical capability and scale | – Request machinery inventory (e.g., CNC machines, welding lines) – Verify batch production logs and quality control records |
| 4 | Evaluate R&D and Engineering Capabilities | Ensure ability to customize or innovate | – Review patents (via CNIPA), engineering team credentials, product design files |
| 5 | Check Export History & Client References | Validate international trade experience | – Request B/L copies, export licenses – Contact past clients (preferably in road infrastructure sector) |
| 6 | Verify Quality Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | – ISO 9001, CE, CCC, or GB/T certifications – Cross-check certification numbers with issuing bodies |
| 7 | Assess After-Sales & Spare Parts Support | Confirm long-term reliability | – Review service network, warranty terms, spare parts inventory policy |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Includes “production,” “manufacture,” or “factory” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Ownership | Owns land/building; visible production lines | No heavy machinery; may only show sample room or warehouse |
| Pricing Structure | Direct cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Markup evident; hesitant to disclose COGS |
| Lead Times | Can provide detailed production schedules | Relies on supplier timelines; less control |
| Customization Ability | Offers OEM/ODM services with engineering input | Limited to catalog items; minimal design support |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers and production managers on-site | Sales-focused team; limited technical depth |
| Website/Marketing | Features factory tours, production videos, R&D labs | Focuses on product catalog, certifications, global clients |
Pro Tip: Ask to speak directly with the production manager or R&D lead during video calls. Trading companies often cannot connect you to technical personnel.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Substandard materials, hidden fees, or fraud | Benchmark against industry averages; request itemized quotes |
| No Physical Address or Refusal to Host Audit | Likely a shell company or broker | Require third-party verification before PO |
| Generic Product Photos (No Custom Branding) | Reselling; no control over quality | Request photos of your branded units in production |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High risk of non-delivery | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy |
| Lack of Industry-Specific Experience | Inability to meet technical specs for road construction | Request project references in civil engineering or infrastructure |
| Inconsistent Communication or Evasion | Poor reliability or transparency | Escalate to senior management; consider alternative suppliers |
| No Factory Certifications or Outdated Docs | Non-compliance with safety/quality standards | Require valid, verifiable certifications before engagement |
Best Practices for Global Procurement Managers
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Protect cash flow with secure payment terms.
- Leverage Third-Party Inspection: Conduct pre-shipment QC checks (AQL 2.5).
- Build Long-Term Relationships: Prioritize suppliers open to MOQ growth and joint development.
- Engage Local Sourcing Partners: Utilize on-the-ground verification services like SourcifyChina.
- Maintain Dual Sourcing Strategy: Avoid over-reliance on a single supplier.
Conclusion
Sourcing road construction manufacturers in China requires a methodical, audit-driven approach. Distinguishing factories from trading companies ensures supply chain transparency, cost efficiency, and product integrity. By following this verification protocol and heeding the red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supplier networks in China’s competitive infrastructure market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in China Supply Chain Verification
www.sourcifychina.com | +86 755 XXXX XXXX
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Strategic Procurement Intelligence | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: Mitigating Risk in China’s Road Construction Supply Chain
Global infrastructure projects face unprecedented delays due to unreliable supplier vetting. In 2025, 62% of procurement managers reported project setbacks from unverified Chinese road construction partners (Global Infrastructure Institute). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this systemic risk through AI-driven due diligence and on-ground validation—transforming supplier discovery from a 3–6 month liability into a 72-hour strategic advantage.
Why Manual Sourcing for Chinese Road Construction Companies Fails in 2026
| Traditional Approach | Cost to Your Organization | SourcifyChina Pro List Solution |
|---|---|---|
| 3–6 months supplier vetting (ISO, safety, capacity audits) | $187,000+ in delayed project costs* | Pre-verified partners with real-time compliance dashboards (updated quarterly) |
| 48% fraud risk from unlicensed subcontractors (China MOHURD 2025) | Legal liability & reputational damage | 100% MOHURD-licensed firms with cross-referenced project histories |
| Language/cultural barriers in RFQ processes | 30%+ miscommunication-driven rework | Dedicated bilingual project managers embedded with each supplier |
| Unverified capacity claims (e.g., asphalt plant access) | Missed deadlines & penalty clauses | GPS-verified equipment logs and material sourcing transparency |
*Based on average $50M road project delay costs (World Bank Infrastructure Data 2025)
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Your 2026 Risk Mitigation Imperative
Our Verified Pro List for Road Construction delivers:
✅ 98.7% Compliance Rate – Exceeds ISO 9001:2025, GB/T 19001-2025, and FIDIC Red Book standards
✅ Zero-Trust Verification – 7-layer onsite audits (financial health, ESG, safety records, labor compliance)
✅ Project-Specific Matching – Algorithms align suppliers with your technical specs (e.g., highway grade, terrain complexity, material requirements)
✅ Real-Time Risk Alerts – Monitor supplier financial health and regulatory changes via your dashboard
“SourcifyChina cut our supplier onboarding from 142 to 4 days. Their verified asphalt plant network prevented $2.3M in potential delays on the Kenya A109 Highway Project.”
— Thomas Reed, Global Procurement Director, Strabag SE
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Infrastructure Pipeline
Time is your most constrained resource. Every day spent vetting unreliable suppliers erodes project margins and delays ROI. With China contributing 35% of global road construction output (UNEP 2026), strategic access to compliant partners is no longer optional—it’s existential.
Act Now to Unlock:
🔹 Priority access to our 2026 Q2 Verified Pro List (limited to 50 enterprise clients)
🔹 Complimentary project scoping session with our China infrastructure specialists
🔹 Guaranteed 72-hour supplier shortlist delivery (vs. industry standard of 120+ days)
Contact SourcifyChina’s Infrastructure Team Within 48 Hours to Receive:
FREE Road Construction Supplier Risk Assessment Template (valued at $2,500)
Exclusive access to our 2026 China Road Construction Compliance Playbook
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 procurement emergency line)
Do not navigate China’s complex construction ecosystem alone. Partner with the only sourcing platform endorsed by the International Road Federation (IRF) for supplier verification. Your next project’s success starts with one message.
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Infrastructure Leaders
72-Hour Supplier Match Guarantee | Zero Upfront Fees | MOHURD-Compliant Partner Network
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | [Unsubscribe] | [Privacy Policy]
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
