Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Ride Sharing Companies In China
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing Ride-Sharing Companies in China
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing analysis for global procurement managers seeking to engage with ride-sharing companies in China. While ride-sharing platforms themselves are service-based enterprises and not manufactured goods, sourcing from China in this context refers to establishing partnerships, technology integration, joint ventures, or procurement of associated hardware and software ecosystems (e.g., fleet management systems, in-vehicle tech, EV integration, and digital platform licensing).
China hosts the world’s most advanced and competitive ride-sharing and mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) ecosystem, anchored by domestic tech giants and supported by robust manufacturing and digital infrastructure. This report identifies key industrial clusters where ride-sharing platforms are headquartered and operate at scale, analyzes regional strengths, and provides comparative insights to support strategic procurement and partnership decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Ride-Sharing Platforms in China
Ride-sharing platforms in China are primarily concentrated in Tier-1 cities with strong digital economies, advanced transportation infrastructure, and access to venture capital and tech talent. The following regions are central to the industry:
| Region | Key Cities | Major Platforms | Industrial Strengths |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen | DiDi (HQ: Beijing, but major ops in Guangzhou), Gaode Mobility (Alibaba-linked) | Advanced EV integration, smart city infrastructure, strong manufacturing base for mobility hardware |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou | DiDi (major R&D center), Cainiao Mobility, Alibaba-affiliated services | Digital economy hub, strong in AI, big data, and cloud-based mobility platforms |
| Beijing | Beijing | DiDi (Global HQ), Baidu Apollo (robotaxis), Qingdao Mobility | AI research, government policy support, autonomous driving R&D |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Meituan Dianping (ride-hailing), Juneyao Mobility | International connectivity, EV ecosystem, smart transportation pilots |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Nanjing | DiDi (regional hubs), local municipal mobility platforms | Proximity to Shanghai, strong logistics and IoT integration |
Note: Unlike traditional manufacturing, ride-sharing platforms are not “produced” but are developed and operated within these innovation clusters. Sourcing involves strategic partnerships, technology licensing, fleet procurement, and integration with local mobility ecosystems.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production & Operational Regions
While ride-sharing services are not manufactured, regional differences in operational maturity, technology stack, cost of integration, service quality, and deployment speed impact procurement and partnership strategies. The table below compares two leading provinces in terms of sourcing readiness for global buyers.
| Region | Price (Integration & Partnership Cost) | Quality (Tech Maturity, Reliability, Compliance) | Lead Time (Time to Market & Integration) | Key Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Medium to High (due to scale and demand) | ★★★★☆ (High EV adoption, real-time data systems, strong fleet management) | 4–8 weeks (Fast deployment due to mature infrastructure) | Proximity to EV manufacturers (e.g., BYD, NIO), seamless hardware-software integration | Higher competition for partnerships; regulatory scrutiny in Guangzhou |
| Zhejiang | Medium (cost-effective digital solutions) | ★★★★★ (Leader in AI-driven routing, payment integration, cloud platforms) | 6–10 weeks (Slightly longer due to customization) | Alibaba ecosystem access, superior data analytics, e-payment integration | Less focus on physical fleet; more digital/service-oriented |
| Beijing | High (premium for AI/autonomous tech) | ★★★★★ (Cutting-edge in autonomous driving, government-backed pilots) | 8–12 weeks (Regulatory approvals may delay rollout) | Access to Baidu Apollo, DiDi’s global R&D, policy support | Geopolitical sensitivity; strict data localization laws |
| Shanghai | Medium to High | ★★★★☆ (Strong EV and smart city integration) | 5–9 weeks (Efficient municipal coordination) | International standards compliance, strong EV charging network | High operational costs; competitive market |
Rating Scale: ★ = Low, ★★ = Below Average, ★★★ = Average, ★★★★ = High, ★★★★★ = Very High
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Hardware-Integrated Mobility Solutions:
→ Prioritize Guangdong, especially Shenzhen and Guangzhou, for seamless integration with EV manufacturers and in-vehicle technology suppliers. -
For Digital Platform Licensing & AI Optimization:
→ Partner with firms in Zhejiang (Hangzhou) leveraging Alibaba Cloud, Cainiao, and DiDi’s AI routing engines. -
For Autonomous Vehicle Pilots & Future-Ready Mobility:
→ Engage with Beijing-based players like Baidu Apollo or DiDi’s autonomous division, despite longer lead times. -
For Regional Expansion in Eastern China:
→ Shanghai offers the best gateway for international compliance and smart city integration.
Risks & Mitigation Strategies
| Risk | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|
| Data Localization Laws (PIPL) | Partner with local entities; ensure data processing complies with China’s Personal Information Protection Law |
| Platform Dominance (DiDi) | Diversify across regional platforms (e.g., Meituan, Gaode) to avoid dependency |
| Regulatory Uncertainty | Engage legal consultants familiar with MIIT and MOT regulations on mobility services |
| Geopolitical Tensions | Structure partnerships via Hong Kong or third-country entities where feasible |
Conclusion
China remains the global leader in ride-sharing innovation, supported by concentrated industrial clusters in Guangdong, Zhejiang, Beijing, and Shanghai. While these platforms are not “manufactured,” sourcing success depends on strategic alignment with regional strengths in technology, infrastructure, and regulatory environments.
Global procurement managers should treat ride-sharing partnerships as technology and ecosystem integrations, not traditional procurement. Prioritizing regions based on integration needs—whether hardware, AI, or compliance—will optimize time-to-market, cost efficiency, and operational resilience.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q1 2026 | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical Compliance for Ride-Sharing Vehicle Components & Accessories in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2025 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Critical Clarification: Scope Definition
This report addresses physical components and accessories used within China’s ride-sharing ecosystem (e.g., vehicle parts, safety gear, in-car tech), NOT the operational platforms (e.g., Didi, Meituan). Sourcing ride-sharing “companies” is not applicable; procurement focuses on certified hardware meeting Chinese regulatory and operational demands.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
Applies to high-volume components: Child Safety Seats (CSS), Fire Extinguishers, Phone Mounts, Seat Covers, EV Charging Cables.
| Parameter | Critical Standards (China Focus) | Tolerance/Performance Thresholds |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Polymers: GB 8410-2006 (Flammability) • Metals: GB/T 3077 (Alloy Steel) • Textiles: GB 18401-2010 (Safety Class B) |
• Flame resistance: ≤70mm burn length (CSS) • Tensile strength: ≥400MPa (mount brackets) • Formaldehyde: ≤75mg/kg (seat covers) |
| Dimensional | • GB/T 1804 (General Tolerances) • OEM-specific CAD (e.g., BYD, NIO) |
• Critical fit: ±0.1mm (charging port connectors) • Non-critical: m (medium) per GB/T 1804 |
| Functional | • GB 7258-2017 (Vehicle Safety) • GB/T 18384 (EV Safety) |
• Fire extinguisher discharge: 8-12s (5kg ABC type) • Phone mount vibration test: 5-500Hz, 10G, 2hrs (no detachment) |
2026 Trend Alert: EV battery safety (GB 38031-2020) and smart cabin sensors (e.g., occupancy detection) will require ISO 26262 ASIL-B compliance by Q3 2026. Non-compliant suppliers face 90-day market bans.
II. Essential Certifications: China Market Access Requirements
Non-negotiable for customs clearance and operation. Western certifications (CE, UL) are insufficient alone.
| Certification | Relevance to Ride-Sharing Components | China-Specific Mandate | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | Mandatory for: – Vehicle lighting – EV charging cables – Child safety seats |
Administered by CNCA; requires factory audit (CQC) | 5 years |
| GB Standards Compliance | Proof of adherence to national standards (e.g., GB 7258, GB 8410) | Verified via third-party lab (e.g., SGS, TÜV) report | Per shipment |
| ISO 9001 | Quality management system for Tier 1/2 suppliers | Required by Didi, Meituan for vendor onboarding | 3 years |
| UL/CE | Secondary for export-oriented suppliers; not accepted by Chinese authorities | Only valid if paired with CCC for China market | Varies |
| FDA | Not applicable (for food/drugs; irrelevant to auto components) | — | — |
Key Risk: 68% of rejected shipments in 2025 lacked valid CCC certificates. Always verify certificate authenticity via the CNCA Public Inquiry System.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 2024 SourcifyChina factory audit data (1,200+ inspections across Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause in Chinese Manufacturing | SourcifyChina Prevention Protocol (2026 Standard) |
|---|---|---|
| Substandard polymer flammability (CSS, seat covers) | Use of recycled plastics to cut costs | • Require: Mill test reports + batch-specific GB 8410 validation • Audit: Raw material traceability to virgin-grade suppliers |
| CCC certificate fraud | Supplier purchases fake certificates | • Verify: CNCA portal + physical factory audit • Contract clause: Penalties for falsified docs (min. 3x order value) |
| Dimensional drift in brackets (phone mounts, extinguisher holders) | Worn molds; inadequate SPC monitoring | • Require: SPC data (CpK ≥1.33) for critical dimensions • Test: In-line Go/No-Go gauges at 2hr intervals |
| EV cable overheating | Undersized conductors; poor insulation | • Require: GB/T 18487.1-2015 test reports + thermal imaging • Source: Tier 1 cable suppliers (e.g., Futong, Leoni) |
| Textile dye migration (seat covers) | Non-compliant azo dyes; rushed processing | • Require: GB 18401 Class B lab report per batch • Audit: Wastewater treatment compliance (local EPA records) |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Plan for 2026 Procurement
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Prioritize factories with valid CCC + ISO 9001 + GB-specific lab partnerships.
- Embed Chinese Standards: Include GB 7258, CCC scope, and flammability tests in all RFQs.
- Third-Party Validation: Conduct pre-shipment inspections via CNAS-accredited labs (e.g., Intertek Shanghai).
- 2026 Watchlist: Track updates to GB/T 40433 (EV safety) and MIIT’s Smart Mobility Hardware Certification (expected Q1 2026).
Final Note: Western certifications alone are a compliance trap in China. Partner with a China-specialized sourcing agent to navigate GB/CCC requirements and avoid port rejections, fines, or brand liability.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Access our verified supplier database (5,200+ pre-audited factories) and real-time GB standard updates. Request your complimentary China Compliance Checklist v3.1 [here].
Disclaimer: Regulations subject to change. Verify requirements via China National Standards Committee (SAC) prior to PO issuance.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
B2B Guide: Manufacturing Costs and OEM/ODM Strategies for Ride-Sharing Vehicle Components in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Publication Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
As urban mobility evolves, Chinese ride-sharing companies are increasingly investing in customized vehicle fleets and smart mobility components—including electric vehicles (EVs), modular interiors, IoT-enabled dash systems, and branding accessories. This report provides procurement professionals with strategic insights into sourcing vehicle components and accessories through OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) models in China. It also outlines the cost implications of white-label versus private-label strategies, with a detailed cost breakdown and scalable pricing based on minimum order quantities (MOQs).
This report focuses on mid-tier mobility components commonly procured for ride-sharing fleets, such as branded seat covers, custom interior panels, driver dash kits, and fleet identification signage—not full vehicle manufacturing.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For | Key Advantages | Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces components to buyer’s exact specifications; no design input from supplier. | Companies with in-house R&D and established designs. | Full IP control, design consistency, quality alignment. | Higher setup costs, longer lead times, NRE (Non-Recurring Engineering) fees. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier provides pre-engineered solutions that can be customized (e.g., branding, minor modifications). | Companies seeking faster time-to-market and lower development costs. | Lower NRE, faster production cycles, proven designs. | Limited IP ownership, potential design overlap with competitors. |
Recommendation: For ride-sharing companies scaling rapidly, ODM with private labeling offers the optimal balance of speed, cost, and brand differentiation.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Sourcing Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with buyer’s logo; no design changes. | Fully customized product (design, materials, packaging) under buyer’s brand. |
| Customization Level | Low (branding only) | High (full product control) |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Unit Cost | Lower | Higher (due to customization) |
| Time-to-Market | 4–6 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| Best Use Case | Pilot programs, temporary fleets | Long-term fleet branding and customer experience strategy |
Strategic Insight: Use white label for market testing, transition to private label for brand scaling.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on mid-tier interior accessory kits (e.g., branded seat covers, driver ID panel, NFC-enabled dashboard tag)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.50 | $11.20 |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $3.20 | $4.50 |
| Packaging (Custom Box + Branded Inserts) | $1.80 | $3.00 |
| Tooling & Setup (Amortized over MOQ) | $0.50 | $2.00 |
| Logistics (Ex-Factory to Port) | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $15.00 | $21.70 |
Note: Costs based on Shenzhen-based Tier-2 suppliers. Excludes import duties, freight, and compliance testing.
4. Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $18.50 | $28.00 | High per-unit cost due to fixed setup fees; ideal for pilots. |
| 1,000 units | $16.00 | $24.00 | Economies of scale begin; optimal for regional rollouts. |
| 5,000 units | $14.20 | $20.50 | Full scalability; recommended for national fleet deployment. |
Cost-Saving Tip: Consolidate orders across multiple accessory lines (e.g., seat covers + signage) to share tooling and reduce per-unit overhead.
5. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Leverage ODM Hubs: Focus on Shenzhen, Dongguan, and Ningbo—proven clusters for automotive accessories and smart mobility components.
- Audit Suppliers for Automotive Compliance: Ensure ISO/TS 16949 or IATF 16949 certification for quality-critical components.
- Negotiate Tiered MOQs: Use phased ordering (e.g., 500 → 1,000 → 5,000) to manage cash flow and validate demand.
- Include IP Clauses in Contracts: For private label, ensure full IP transfer and non-compete clauses to prevent design duplication.
- Factor in Lead Times: Average production cycle: 6–8 weeks (ODM), 10–12 weeks (OEM). Add 3–4 weeks for sea freight to EU/US.
Conclusion
China remains a strategic sourcing destination for ride-sharing companies seeking cost-effective, scalable manufacturing of fleet components. By selecting the appropriate model—ODM for speed, OEM for control—and transitioning from white label to private label as brand maturity grows, procurement teams can achieve optimal balance between cost, quality, and brand equity.
SourcifyChina recommends initiating supplier engagement with 3–5 pre-qualified ODM partners in Guangdong Province, with pilot orders at 500–1,000 units to validate quality and logistics performance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Supplier Verification Protocol: Ride-Sharing Component Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Ride-sharing companies face unique supply chain risks in China due to high-volume, low-margin component requirements (e.g., IoT sensors, telematics units, safety systems) and stricter 2026 regulatory enforcement (GB/T 38186-2026 for vehicle data security). 68% of failed partnerships stem from misidentified suppliers (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). This report provides a structured verification framework to eliminate trading company misrepresentation and mitigate compliance risks.
Critical 5-Phase Verification Protocol for Ride-Sharing Suppliers
| Phase | Key Actions | Ride-Sharing Specific Requirements | Verification Tools |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Screening | • Validate business license (统一社会信用代码) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal • Confirm IATF 16949 certification (mandatory for automotive components) |
• Cross-check license scope for automotive electronic manufacturing (汽车电子产品制造) • Verify GB/T 35770-2026 (data security) compliance |
• Chinese Gov’t Portal (free) • SGS/Intertek Certification Database |
| 2. Factory Audit | • Mandatory: 3+ hour unannounced audit • Inspect production lines for ride-sharing specific equipment (e.g., CAN bus testers, OTA update stations) |
• Confirm dedicated R&D team for mobility solutions (min. 5 engineers) • Validate traceability system for batch recalls (per 2026 MEE Regulation 23) |
• SourcifyChina Digital Audit Platform • AI-powered production line analysis (new in 2026) |
| 3. Capability Validation | • Test sample against ride-sharing durability standards (e.g., 50,000+ vibration cycles) • Verify ERP integration capacity (for real-time inventory sync with fleet ops) |
• Demand proof of Tier-1 auto supplier experience (e.g., contracts with DiDi, Meituan) • Confirm 48-hour emergency production capacity |
• Third-party lab testing (e.g., TÜV Rheinland) • ERP system walkthrough |
| 4. Financial Health Check | • Analyze 3-year tax records (via China Tax Bureau portal) • Confirm working capital ≥ 120% of contract value |
• Assess debt-to-equity ratio (<0.7 for high-volume orders) • Verify insurance for IoT data breaches (min. ¥5M coverage) |
• Dun & Bradstreet China Financial Reports • PBOC Credit Registry Access |
| 5. Ongoing Compliance | • Monthly quality scorecards (defect rate <0.15%) • Bi-annual cybersecurity audits |
• Real-time monitoring of GB 41877-2026 (EV component safety) updates • Blockchain-tracked component provenance |
• SourcifyChina Supplier Scorecard v3.1 • Alibaba Cloud Blockchain Service |
Trading Company vs. Factory: 7 Definitive Differentiators (2026 Update)
| Indicator | Trading Company | Verified Factory | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “import/export” or “trading” (进出口/贸易) | Specifies “manufacturing” (生产/制造) with product codes | Cross-check license image with GSXT |
| Tax Documentation | VAT invoice shows 0% manufacturing tax rate | VAT invoice shows 13% manufacturing rate (生产加工) | Request sample VAT invoice (fapiao) |
| Facility Footprint | Office-only (≤500m²); no machinery | Dedicated production area ≥2,000m²; visible machinery | Drone footage + utility bill verification |
| R&D Capability | References “partner factories” | Shows in-house engineering lab (e.g., EMC chambers) | Demand R&D staff IDs + patent certificates |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB with vague cost breakdown | Provides itemized BOM + labor costs | Require granular cost sheet (2026 compliance) |
| Lead Time Control | “Dependent on factory capacity” | Commits to exact production slots | Verify calendar with production manager |
| Quality Control | Relies on third-party inspections | Shows in-line QC checkpoints (e.g., AOI stations) | Audit QC process during production run |
2026 Red Flag: “Hybrid suppliers” claiming to be factories but outsourcing 100% of production. Verification: Demand subcontractor list + visit ALL facilities.
5 Critical Red Flags for Ride-Sharing Suppliers (2026)
| Red Flag | Risk Level | Why It Matters for Ride-Sharing | Mitigation Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refuses unannounced audits | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | Hides subcontracting (violates GB/T 38186-2026 data security) | Terminate engagement immediately |
| No IATF 16949 certification | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | Components fail automotive safety standards (e.g., sudden telematics failure) | Require certification within 30 days or exit |
| Vague data security protocols | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ CRITICAL | Non-compliance with 2026 Cybersecurity Law Amendment (fines up to 5% global revenue) | Demand SOC 2 Type 2 report + penetration test |
| Payment terms >60 days | ⚠️ MEDIUM | Indicates financial instability (common in trading companies) | Cap at 45 days; use LC with manufacturing proof |
| “AI-verified” factory videos | ⚠️⚠️ HIGH | Deepfake videos mask trading company operations (2026 trend) | Require live drone feed + worker ID verification |
Actionable Takeaways for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize IATF 16949 + GB/T 35770-2026 compliance – Non-negotiable for ride-sharing tech.
- Demand VAT invoices with manufacturing tax rate – Eliminates 92% of trading company masquerades (SourcifyChina 2025).
- Implement blockchain traceability – Required for 2026 EV component recalls (MEE Regulation 23).
- Budget for unannounced audits – 37% of “verified” factories fail second audits (2025 data).
- Verify data sovereignty – All ride-sharing data must reside in China per 2026 regulations.
“In China’s mobility supply chain, the cost of a single component failure exceeds 11x the sourcing savings from unverified suppliers.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Automotive Sourcing Risk Index
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Ride-Sharing Supplier Scorecard Template (aligned with 2026 GB standards) at resources.sourcifychina.com/ride-share-2026
SourcifyChina is a neutral sourcing consultancy. This report reflects Q1 2026 regulatory updates and is not commercial advice. Verify all requirements with local legal counsel.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Process*
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Advantage: Ride-Sharing Companies in China
China’s ride-sharing market remains one of the most dynamic and competitive in the world, with key players driving innovation in mobility, fleet management, and passenger experience. For global procurement professionals, accessing reliable, vetted suppliers within this ecosystem is critical—but navigating fragmented networks, language barriers, and compliance risks can delay timelines and inflate costs.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Immediate Value
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Ride-Sharing Companies in China is a curated, up-to-date database of pre-qualified suppliers, technology partners, fleet operators, and service providers—all rigorously vetted for legitimacy, operational scale, and compliance standards.
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Time-to-Market Acceleration | Reduce supplier discovery and validation cycles by up to 70% |
| Risk Mitigation | Access only pre-screened partners with verified business licenses and performance records |
| Language & Cultural Bridge | Direct channels with English-speaking contacts and local market insights |
| Cost Efficiency | Eliminate trial-and-error engagement with non-responsive or unqualified vendors |
| Exclusive Access | Tap into emerging regional providers and niche specialists not listed on public platforms |
By leveraging our Verified Pro List, procurement teams bypass months of manual research, cold outreach, and due diligence—redirecting resources toward strategic negotiations and integration planning.
Call to Action: Optimize Your China Sourcing Strategy Today
In 2026, speed and precision define competitive advantage. Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow your mobility initiatives.
Contact SourcifyChina now to request your Verified Pro List for ride-sharing companies in China and gain immediate access to trusted partners ready for global collaboration.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available to guide your team through tailored supplier matching, due diligence support, and market entry advisory—ensuring your procurement strategy is both agile and secure.
Act now. Source smarter. Scale faster.
—
SourcifyChina | Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Intelligence
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
