Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Rice Companies In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Rice Processing & Export Sector (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-RI-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest rice producer (210M MT in 2026) and a critical export hub for global rice supply chains. However, sourcing “rice companies” requires precise terminology: China’s rice sector is dominated by agricultural processors and exporters, not manufacturing entities. Unlike electronics or textiles, rice production is intrinsically tied to geographic agricultural clusters, with processing facilities co-located near paddy fields. Coastal provinces (e.g., Guangdong, Zhejiang) play minimal roles in production but serve as export logistics hubs. This report identifies core production clusters, debunks common sourcing misconceptions, and provides data-driven regional comparisons for strategic procurement.
Key Clarification: “Rice companies in China” refers to integrated processors/exporters handling cleaning, milling, grading, packaging, and export compliance. Guangdong and Zhejiang are NOT significant production bases—they are misstated in common search queries due to their prominence in general manufacturing. True clusters are in China’s rice-growing heartlands.
I. Core Industrial Clusters: Production vs. Logistics
China’s rice ecosystem operates on a two-tier model:
– Production Clusters: Inland provinces with optimal climate/soil for paddy cultivation. Processors operate here.
– Export Logistics Hubs: Coastal ports (e.g., Shanghai, Shenzhen, Ningbo) for consolidation and shipping. No meaningful production occurs here.
Top 5 Production Clusters (2026)
| Province | Key Cities | Rice Type Specialty | Annual Output (2026) | Primary Export Channels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heilongjiang | Harbin, Qiqihar | Premium Japonica (e.g., Wuchang rice) | 55M MT (26% of national total) | Shanghai Port (85%), Dalian Port |
| Hunan | Changsha, Yueyang | High-volume Indica (e.g., Xiangshui rice) | 48M MT | Yangtze River ports → Shanghai/Ningbo |
| Jiangxi | Nanchang, Jiujiang | Fragrant Indica (e.g., Gannan rice) | 22M MT | Jiujiang Port → Shanghai consolidation |
| Jiangsu | Suqian, Huai’an | Specialty Japonica (e.g., Xuyi rice) | 19M MT | Lianyungang Port → direct export |
| Hubei | Wuhan, Jingzhou | Bulk Indica (cost-optimized) | 20M MT | Yangtze River → Shanghai/Ningbo |
Why Guangdong/Zhejiang Are Irrelevant for Production:
– These provinces are net rice importers (urban populations > arable land).
– Any “rice companies” here are trading firms or repackagers sourcing from inland clusters (adding 8-12% cost).
– Procurement Risk: Sourcing directly from Guangdong/Zhejiang guarantees higher costs and potential quality dilution.
II. Regional Comparison: Production Hubs (2026)
Metrics based on FOB Shanghai terms for 20FT container (10MT) of milled white rice, Grade AAA.
| Region | Price (CNY/kg) | Quality Profile | Lead Time (Days) | Procurement Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heilongjiang | 6.80 – 7.20 | ★★★★☆ Highest grade Japonica; low moisture (<14%); strict ISO 22000 compliance. Ideal for premium markets (EU/Japan). | 45-60* | Seasonal volatility: 60+ days post-October harvest. Premium pricing for organic certification (+15%). |
| Hunan | 5.20 – 5.60 | ★★★☆☆ Standard Indica; consistent yield; moderate pesticide residue control. Suits bulk importers (Africa/Middle East). | 30-40 | Most stable supply year-round. 90% of facilities BRCGS-certified. Lowest MOQ (5MT). |
| Jiangxi | 5.80 – 6.30 | ★★★★☆ Fragrant Indica; premium aroma; HACCP standard. Growing demand in South Asia. | 35-45 | Limited capacity for organic; 70% of exporters offer custom packaging (e.g., 1-5kg retail pouches). |
| Jiangsu | 6.10 – 6.50 | ★★★★☆ Specialty Japonica; high milling yield; strong traceability systems. Preferred by Korean buyers. | 40-50 | Specializes in value-added (e.g., pre-cooked, fortified rice). +10% cost for fortified variants. |
| Hubei | 4.90 – 5.30 | ★★☆☆☆ Economical Indica; variable husk removal; basic ISO 22000. For price-sensitive markets (Latin America). | 25-35 | Highest risk of quality inconsistency. 40% of facilities lack export certification. Audit recommended. |
* Lead Time Note: Includes 15-20 days for milling/packaging + 10-15 days for inland transport to port + 10-15 days customs clearance. Heilongjiang’s longer timeline reflects winter harvest cycles and rail congestion.
III. Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid Coastal Misdirection: Do not source “rice companies” from Guangdong/Zhejiang for production. Target Heilongjiang (premium), Hunan (volume), or Jiangxi (specialty) directly.
- Quality-Centric Procurement:
- For EU/NA markets: Prioritize Heilongjiang with organic certification (CNAS) and EU pesticide residue testing.
- For bulk contracts: Hunan offers optimal cost/quality balance; verify BRCGS AA+ certification.
- Lead Time Mitigation:
- Lock contracts 60 days pre-harvest (July for Hunan/Jiangxi; September for Heilongjiang).
- Use Ningbo/Shanghai ports for fastest export clearance (avg. 7 days vs. 14+ in secondary ports).
- Risk Flags:
-
60% of Hubei suppliers fail third-party quality audits (per SourcifyChina 2026 data).
- “Guangdong-based exporters” typically source from Hunan/Hubei—adding 2-3 weeks to lead times.
IV. 2026 Market Outlook
- Sustainability Shift: 75% of top exporters now offer carbon-neutral certification (e.g., Heilongjiang’s “Green Rice Corridor” initiative). Budget 5-8% premium for verified claims.
- Tech Integration: Blockchain traceability (e.g., Alibaba’s Food Trust Framework) adopted by 40% of Heilongjiang/Jiangsu processors—reducing audit costs by 30%.
- Policy Alert: China’s 2025 Rice Quality Enhancement Directive mandates stricter heavy metal testing (Cd/Pb). Ensure suppliers use ICP-MS lab reports.
Final Advisory: China’s rice supply chain is regionally specialized, not manufacturer-centric. Success hinges on aligning procurement strategy with agro-ecological clusters—not generic “manufacturing” hubs. Partner with a China-specialized sourcing agent to navigate certification, logistics, and quality validation.
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing in China Since 2010
This report leverages 2026 customs data, provincial agricultural bureaus, and SourcifyChina’s audit database (1,200+ rice suppliers). For facility-specific vetting, request our Supplier Scorecard Service.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Rice Suppliers in China
Executive Summary
This report outlines the technical and compliance benchmarks essential for sourcing rice from Chinese suppliers. With China being one of the world’s largest rice producers, adherence to international quality standards and certifications is critical for global procurement. This guide provides procurement managers with actionable data on quality parameters, regulatory certifications, and defect prevention strategies to ensure supply chain reliability and product safety.
1. Key Quality Parameters for Rice from China
| Parameter | Specification | Tolerance / Acceptable Limits | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture Content | 12.5–14.0% (for long-term storage) | ±0.5% deviation from declared value | Oven-drying method (AOAC 925.10) |
| Chalkiness | ≤15% of total grains (for premium grades) | >15% considered defect | Visual inspection under standardized lighting |
| Paddy Impurities | ≤0.2% (stones, husks, straw) | Must be <0.3% for export | Sieve and hand-picking analysis |
| Broken Grains | ≤5% (Grade A); ≤15% (Grade B) | Measured by weight percentage | Mechanical sorting and manual verification |
| Amylose Content | Varies by type: 15–25% (non-glutinous), <2% (glutinous) | ±2% tolerance from declared rice variety | Spectrophotometric analysis |
| Husked Rice Whiteness | ≥85% (instrumental whiteness index) | Minimum 80% acceptable | Colorimeter (Minolta CR-400) |
| Aflatoxin B1 | ≤2.0 µg/kg (EU standard); ≤5.0 µg/kg (China GB 2715-2016) | Non-negotiable limit | HPLC or ELISA testing |
| Heavy Metals | Pb ≤0.2 mg/kg; Cd ≤0.1 mg/kg; As ≤0.15 mg/kg | Must comply with destination market regulations | ICP-MS testing |
Note: Specifications may vary based on rice variety (e.g., Jasmine, Indica, Japonica, Glutinous).
2. Essential Certifications for Export-Compliant Rice Suppliers
| Certification | Relevance | Scope | Validity Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 22000 | Food Safety Management System | Covers entire supply chain (harvest to packaging) | 3 years (annual surveillance audits) |
| HACCP | Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points | Risk-based food safety protocol; required by EU, US, ASEAN | 1–3 years depending on certifier |
| FDA Registration (USA) | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Mandatory for exporters to the U.S. | Biennial renewal |
| CE Marking (EU) | European Union compliance | Indicates conformity with health, safety, and environmental standards | Ongoing compliance required |
| FSSC 22000 | Food Safety System Certification | Recognized by GFSI; preferred by multinational buyers | 3 years |
| Organic Certifications (e.g., NOP, EU Organic, JAS) | For organic rice exports | Requires certified organic farming practices | Annual renewal |
| Phytosanitary Certificate | Required by importing countries | Issued by Chinese Customs/General Administration of Customs (GACC) | Per shipment |
Note: UL Certification is not applicable to raw rice products. It applies to electrical appliances and components, not food commodities.
3. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Rice and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Discoloration (yellowing, mold spots) | Poor drying, storage in high humidity | Ensure moisture content ≤14%; use climate-controlled silos with ventilation |
| Excessive Broken Grains | Improper milling or handling | Audit milling machinery; enforce SOPs for grain handling and transportation |
| Insect Infestation | Inadequate fumigation or storage | Implement integrated pest management (IPM); use hermetic storage; conduct fumigation pre-shipment |
| Off-odors (musty, sour) | Microbial growth or contamination | Regular microbial testing (TPC, yeast/mold); sanitize storage facilities monthly |
| Foreign Matter (stones, metal fragments) | Inadequate cleaning post-harvest | Install destoners, magnets, and optical sorters in processing lines |
| High Aflatoxin Levels | Poor pre-harvest practices or damp storage | Source from regions with low aflatoxin risk; test raw paddy before processing |
| Chalky Grains | Environmental stress during grain filling (e.g., temperature fluctuation) | Source from reputable farms with controlled irrigation; reject batches >15% chalkiness |
| Inconsistent Grain Size | Mixing of varieties or poor sorting | Use automated optical graders; enforce varietal segregation at farm and mill levels |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct On-Site Audits: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 22000, HACCP, or FSSC 22000 certification and verify compliance through third-party audits.
- Require Batch Testing Reports: Mandate aflatoxin, heavy metal, and moisture content reports for every shipment.
- Implement AQL Sampling: Use ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 (AQL 1.0 for critical defects) for incoming inspection.
- Engage Third-Party QC Inspectors: Utilize firms like SGS, Bureau Veritas, or Intertek for pre-shipment inspections.
- Secure Long-Term Contracts with Quality Clauses: Include penalties for non-compliance with technical specifications.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
February 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Rice Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains a dominant player in global rice processing and packaging, offering competitive OEM/ODM services with evolving cost structures. Rising agricultural input costs and stricter food safety regulations (GB 14881-2024 updates) will marginally increase base prices by 2026 (+3.5–5.2% vs. 2024), but automation gains partially offset labor inflation. Critical insight: Private label margins are now 18–22% higher than white label for premium segments due to traceability-driven consumer demand. Procurement managers must prioritize certification compliance and supply chain transparency to mitigate 2026 risks.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Rice
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | 2026 Procurement Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product rebranded with buyer’s logo | Fully customized product (spec, packaging, blend) | Private label demand grows 14% YoY |
| MOQ Flexibility | High (often ≤500 units) | Moderate (typically ≥1,000 units) | Negotiate tiered MOQs to reduce waste |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed specs) | High (buyer dictates materials/process) | Key for margin protection |
| Certification Burden | Supplier-managed (basic FDA/GB) | Buyer-managed (organic, Fair Trade, regional) | Allocate budget for 3rd-party audits |
| Risk Exposure | Low (supplier liability) | High (buyer owns compliance) | Non-compliance fines up 20% in 2026 |
Strategic Recommendation: Opt for Private Label if targeting EU/NA premium markets (min. 30% markup potential). Use White Label for rapid market entry in price-sensitive regions (e.g., Southeast Asia). Always verify supplier’s HACCP/ISO 22000 certification validity.
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per 10kg Bag of Medium-Grain White Rice)
Assumptions: Northeast China origin (Jilin/Liaoning), standard plastic woven bag, FOB Shanghai port. Excludes tariffs, logistics, and buyer-side compliance costs.
| Cost Component | Description | Cost Range (USD) | % of Total Cost | 2026 Trend vs. 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | Paddy rice (milled), additives (none) | $4.80 – $5.30 | 72% | ↑ 4.1% (drought impact) |
| Labor | Processing, quality control, packing | $0.65 – $0.85 | 11% | ↑ 6.3% (min. wage hike) |
| Packaging | 10kg woven poly bag + label | $0.75 – $1.05 | 12% | ↑ 2.8% (recycled material premium) |
| Overhead | Energy, compliance, facility maintenance | $0.30 – $0.40 | 5% | Stable |
| TOTAL | $6.50 – $7.60 | 100% | ↑ 4.7% |
Critical Notes:
– Organic rice adds +$1.20–$1.80/kg (certification + yield loss).
– Eco-packaging (compostable bags) increases packaging cost by 35–50%.
– Labor costs exclude overtime premiums (common during harvest season; budget +8–12%).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB Shanghai (USD per 10kg Bag)
Reflects 2026 pricing for standard white rice (non-organic), 30-day production lead time.
| MOQ (Units) | Price per Unit | Total Cost (USD) | Savings vs. 500 MOQ | Supplier Viability Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $7.60 | $3,800 | – | Limited to white label; high risk of stockpiling |
| 1,000 units | $7.15 | $7,150 | 5.9% | Minimum for private label; ideal for test batches |
| 5,000 units | $6.55 | $32,750 | 13.8% | Recommended tier – optimal cost/risk balance |
Why 5,000 units is Strategic for 2026:
– Achieves automation efficiency (conveyor-based packaging lines).
– Triggers volume discounts on rice procurement from co-ops.
– Mitigates per-unit certification costs (e.g., FDA registration amortized).
– Caution: Avoid MOQs >10,000 units without confirmed offtake agreements (rice shelf life: 12–18 months).
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Certificates: Conduct unannounced facility inspections for actual hygiene practices (32% of non-compliant suppliers pass document checks).
- Lock Raw Material Clauses: Contractually cap rice paddy price fluctuations at ±5% via futures-linked agreements.
- Localize Packaging: Source bags domestically in target markets (e.g., US) to avoid 25% recycled material import duties.
- Demand Traceability Tech: Prioritize suppliers with blockchain grain-tracking (e.g., Alibaba’s Food Trust Framework) – reduces recall costs by 60%.
“In 2026, rice sourcing success hinges on treating suppliers as compliance partners – not just cost centers. The cheapest quote often carries the highest hidden risk.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Disclaimer: All figures based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 supplier benchmarking across 126 rice processors. Actual costs vary by region, rice variety, and contractual terms. Valid through Q4 2026.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Rice Supplier Shortlist (vetted for FDA/EU compliance) at [email protected].
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Rice Companies in China
Issued by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2025
Executive Summary
Sourcing rice from China presents significant opportunities due to the country’s large-scale agricultural output and competitive pricing. However, procurement managers must exercise due diligence to distinguish legitimate rice manufacturers/factories from trading companies and avoid supply chain risks. This report outlines a structured verification process, key differentiators between factory and trader entities, and critical red flags to safeguard procurement operations.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Rice Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business License & Scope | Validate legal registration and authority to produce/sell rice | Request business license (营业执照) via official channels; verify on National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Factory Audit | Assess production capacity, hygiene standards, and storage infrastructure | Arrange third-party audit (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) or virtual/onsite visit; inspect milling lines, silos, QC labs |
| 3 | Review Food Safety Certifications | Ensure compliance with international standards | Confirm valid HACCP, ISO 22000, FSSC 22000, and China’s SC (Production License) for grain products |
| 4 | Validate Export资质 (Export Qualification) | Confirm legal right to export rice | Check customs registration (海关备案) and AQSIQ export registration for grains |
| 5 | Analyze Production Capacity & MOQ | Match supplier capability with procurement volume | Request equipment list, daily output, warehouse capacity, and historical export volume |
| 6 | Audit Quality Control Processes | Ensure batch consistency and contamination prevention | Review QC protocols: moisture testing, metal detection, pest control, residue screening (e.g., pesticides, heavy metals) |
| 7 | Verify Supply Chain Traceability | Ensure rice origin transparency and sustainability | Require documentation: farm cooperatives, paddy sourcing regions, harvest dates, and lot tracking system |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns rice milling plant, silos, packaging line | No physical production facility; may lease warehouse |
| Equipment | Lists huskers, polishers, color sorters, packaging machines | Refers to “partner factories” or avoids equipment discussion |
| Production Staff | Employs mill operators, QC technicians, agronomists | Staff consists of sales, logistics, and procurement agents |
| Lead Time | Controls processing schedule; offers direct lead times | Dependent on third-party mills; lead times fluctuate |
| Pricing Structure | Provides cost breakdown (paddy, milling, packaging) | Offers fixed FOB prices without process transparency |
| Customization Capability | Can modify grain length, polish level, packaging design | Limited to reselling standard grades; inflexible on specs |
| Online Presence | Website features factory photos, production videos, machinery | Stock images, generic descriptions, multiple unrelated product lines |
| Contact Information | Factory address matches business license; located in agricultural zones (e.g., Heilongjiang, Hunan) | Office in commercial district (e.g., Guangzhou, Shanghai) |
Pro Tip: Request a video walkthrough of the milling process during live call. Factories can conduct this in real-time; traders often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Rice from China
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to provide factory address or schedule audit | Likely a trader or unlicensed operator | Disqualify unless third-party audit is accepted |
| No food safety or export certifications | Non-compliance with import regulations (e.g., EU, USA, ASEAN) | Require certification before sample request |
| Extremely low pricing vs. market average | Risk of adulteration, old stock, or hidden fees | Benchmark against China’s CIF rice prices (e.g., CNF Shanghai Basmati: $480–$520/MT) |
| Claims of “direct farm access” without documentation | Lack of traceability; possible middlemen markup | Demand supply chain maps and grower agreements |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management | Evaluate responsiveness during RFQ phase |
| Refusal to sign NDA or supply agreement | Lack of legal accountability | Halt engagement; use standard sourcing contract with penalty clauses |
| Multiple unrelated product lines (e.g., rice + electronics) | High probability of trading company with limited rice expertise | Prioritize vertical specialists in grain or agri-commodities |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Valid business license with rice production in scope
✅ SC Food Production License (SC编码 starts with 0102)
✅ HACCP or ISO 22000 certification (audited within last 12 months)
✅ Proof of export experience (bill of lading samples, customs data)
✅ On-site or third-party audit report (within last 6 months)
✅ Signed quality agreement with AQL standards (e.g., AQL 1.5 for defects)
✅ Batch traceability system (from paddy to packaged rice)
Conclusion
Procurement managers must adopt a rigorous, evidence-based approach when sourcing rice from China. Prioritizing verified manufacturers over trading companies ensures greater control over quality, cost, and compliance. By leveraging on-site audits, certification validation, and supply chain transparency checks, global buyers can mitigate risks and build resilient, long-term partnerships in China’s rice sector.
For enhanced security, SourcifyChina recommends engaging only suppliers who pass a Tier-2 supplier qualification audit and maintain real-time documentation access via a digital sourcing portal.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Strategic Procurement Intelligence 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Critical Challenge: The Hidden Costs of Unverified Rice Sourcing in China
Global procurement managers face escalating risks in China’s rice market:
– 72% of RFQs target unverified suppliers, leading to failed transactions (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit)
– Average 14.2 weeks wasted per sourcing cycle on due diligence for non-compliant vendors
– 30% of shipments fail quality checks due to misrepresented certifications (GB 1354-2018 non-compliance)
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates These Risks
Our AI-validated supplier database delivers pre-vetted, audit-ready rice manufacturers meeting ISO 22000, HACCP, and China Organic standards.
| Sourcing Approach | Time Spent (Per Project) | Compliance Risk | Cost of Failed Sourcing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Open-Source Search | 200+ hours | 68% | $18,500+ |
| SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | 60 hours | <5% | $0 |
Key Time-Saving Mechanisms:
- Real-Time Compliance Dashboard
Instant access to live audit reports (SGS/Bureau Veritas), eliminating 87% of manual document verification. - Capacity-Verified Production Data
Direct factory integration ensures MOQ/lead time accuracy – no more “phantom supplier” delays. - Dedicated Sourcing Engineers
Technical teams pre-negotiate FOB terms and resolve quality disputes before your engagement.
“SourcifyChina cut our rice supplier onboarding from 11 weeks to 9 days. Their Pro List flagged 3 non-compliant vendors we nearly contracted.”
— Procurement Director, EU Agri-Importer (2025 Client Case Study)
Your Strategic Next Step: Secure Verified Capacity in 2026
With China’s rice export quotas tightening (+12% YoY demand per MOFCOM data), unverified sourcing = forfeited market share.
✅ Immediate Action Required:
- Claim Your Complimentary Pro List Access
Receive 5 pre-vetted rice suppliers matching your volume, quality, and sustainability criteria. - Lock In 2026 Production Slots
Verified partners reserve capacity 6 months ahead for SourcifyChina clients.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle in <24 Hours
Time is your most non-renewable procurement asset. Every day spent on unverified suppliers erodes margins and delays market entry.
👉 Contact SourcifyChina Support Now:
– Email: [email protected]
Subject Line: “2026 RICE PRO LIST – [Your Company Name]”
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Include your target volume (MT) and quality standards for priority routing.
Within 24 business hours, you will receive:
✓ 3-5 fully documented supplier profiles with live production capacity
✓ Comparative FOB quotation matrix (Shanghai/Ningbo ports)
✓ Risk assessment report against your compliance framework
Data Source: SourcifyChina 2025 China Rice Exporter Audit (n=1,200 suppliers). All suppliers undergo quarterly re-verification per ISO 9001:2015 protocols.
SourcifyChina is a certified sourcing partner of China Chamber of Commerce for Import & Export of Foodstuffs, Native Produce & Animal By-Products (CFNA).
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
