Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Purses Made In China Wholesale
SourcifyChina Strategic Sourcing Report 2026: Purses Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for purse manufacturing, accounting for 68% of worldwide wholesale production (SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, 2025). While cost advantages persist, 2026 procurement strategies must prioritize cluster specialization, compliance rigor, and supply chain resilience amid rising labor costs (+7.2% YoY) and stringent EU/US regulatory frameworks. This report identifies optimal sourcing regions, quantifies trade-offs, and provides actionable pathways for risk-mitigated procurement.
Key Industrial Clusters Analysis
China’s purse manufacturing is concentrated in three coastal provinces, each with distinct capabilities:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Annual Output | Key Buyer Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Dongguan, Foshan | Premium leather goods, luxury accessories, tech-integrated purses | 42% of national volume | EU/US luxury brands, high-end retailers |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou, Jinhua, Yiwu | Mid-market fashion purses, synthetic materials, rapid-turnaround OEM | 38% of national volume | Fast-fashion retailers, e-commerce brands |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Quanzhou | Sport/leisure purses, eco-materials (recycled PET), budget accessories | 15% of national volume | Mass-market retailers, sustainable brands |
Note: 92% of factories in these clusters hold ISO 9001 certification (2025 China Leather Industry Association data). Avoid non-coastal regions due to logistical inefficiencies and inconsistent quality control.
Regional Comparison: Critical Procurement Metrics
Data validated via SourcifyChina’s 2026 Factory Audit Database (n=217 verified purse manufacturers)
| Metric | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Fujian | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $12.50 – $45.00+ (leather) $8.00 – $22.00 (synthetic) |
$6.00 – $18.50 (synthetic) $15.00 – $35.00 (leather) |
$4.50 – $14.00 (eco-synthetic) $10.00 – $28.00 (leather) |
Guangdong commands 20-30% premium for craftsmanship; Zhejiang optimal for volume-driven synthetic orders. |
| Quality (Defect Rate) | 0.8% – 1.5% (Strict QC, <2% material waste) |
2.5% – 4.0% (Variable; higher in sub-50k MOQ orders) |
1.8% – 3.2% (Eco-materials: 0.9% defect rate) |
Guangdong leads in consistency; Zhejiang requires enhanced 3rd-party QC for sub-$10 units. |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (production) +14 days (FCL ocean) |
30-45 days (production) +18 days (FCL ocean) |
35-50 days (production) +20 days (FCL ocean) |
Zhejiang fastest for urgent orders; Guangdong’s integrated supply chain minimizes delays. |
| MOQ Flexibility | 500-1,000 units (leather) 300-800 units (synthetic) |
100-500 units (synthetic) 300-700 units (leather) |
200-600 units (eco) 400-900 units (leather) |
Zhejiang best for test orders; Guangdong requires larger commitments. |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026 Procurement
- Tiered Sourcing Strategy:
- Premium/Luxury Lines: Source from Guangdong (prioritize Dongguan for leather; Foshan for hardware integration). Verify tannery certifications (e.g., LWG Gold).
- Volume Fashion Lines: Target Zhejiang’s Wenzhou cluster for synthetic purses. Mandate AQL 1.5 inspections to offset quality variance.
-
Sustainable Collections: Partner with Fujian’s Jinjiang eco-factories (audit for GRS/SCS certifications).
-
Critical Risk Mitigation:
- Compliance: 63% of EU rejections in 2025 stemmed from phthalates in Zhejiang-sourced synthetics. Require full material traceability and batch-specific test reports (REACH, CPSIA).
- Lead Time Buffer: Add 10-15 days to quoted timelines due to Pearl River Delta port congestion (Q4 2025 avg. delay: 8.2 days).
-
MOQ Negotiation: Leverage Zhejiang’s competitive landscape; 78% of factories accept 20% lower MOQs for 12-month contracts.
-
2026 Trend Alert:
Rise of “Traceable Luxury”: 41% of EU luxury buyers now demand blockchain-tracked material origins (sourcing from Guangdong’s Foshan cluster shows 92% compliance readiness). Budget 3-5% cost premium for this capability.
Conclusion
Guangdong remains unmatched for quality and complexity, while Zhejiang delivers agility for fast-fashion cycles. Do not optimize solely on price – Fujian’s eco-purse defect rates are 40% lower than Zhejiang’s synthetics at comparable price points. Partner with a sourcing agent possessing on-ground QC teams to navigate regional nuances; SourcifyChina’s 2026 data shows vetted suppliers achieve 22% lower total landed costs through defect prevention and logistics optimization.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy
Methodology: 217 factory audits, 2025 customs data analysis, buyer sentiment survey (n=89 global brands), CLIA regulatory updates.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. Data sources: China Customs, CLIA, SourcifyChina Audit Database.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
SourcifyChina | Global Procurement Intelligence
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Purses Made in China – Wholesale Sourcing Guide
Executive Summary
The global demand for high-quality, compliant, and cost-effective handbags and purses continues to grow, with China remaining a dominant manufacturing hub. For procurement managers, ensuring product integrity, regulatory compliance, and consistent quality is critical. This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance standards, and quality control benchmarks essential for sourcing purses from China at wholesale scale.
1. Technical Specifications for Purses Made in China
1.1 Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Preferred Standards |
|---|---|---|
| Outer Shell | Genuine leather, PU leather, PVC, nylon, canvas, recycled polyester | EN 14362 (azo dyes), REACH Annex XVII, Oeko-Tex Standard 100 |
| Lining | Polyester, cotton, microfiber, recycled fabrics | Low VOC emissions, colorfastness ≥ Grade 4 |
| Hardware | Zinc alloy, stainless steel, brass, nickel-free options | Nickel release < 0.5 µg/cm²/week (EU Nickel Directive) |
| Zippers | YKK, SBS, or equivalent; nylon, metal, or coil types | ISO 105-C06 (colorfastness), smooth operation (≤ 10 N pull force) |
| Adhesives | Water-based, solvent-free | Compliant with REACH, low formaldehyde (< 75 ppm) |
1.2 Tolerances & Dimensional Accuracy
| Parameter | Allowable Tolerance | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|
| Length/Width/Height | ±3 mm | Caliper or digital measuring tape |
| Strap Length | ±5 mm | Tape measure under light tension |
| Seam Allowance | 6–8 mm (consistent) | Visual + physical check |
| Stitch Density | 8–12 stitches per inch | Count per linear inch |
| Color Variation (ΔE) | ≤ 2.0 (vs. approved sample) | Spectrophotometer (CIE Lab*) |
| Weight | ±5% of sample weight | Digital scale (0.1g precision) |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Purpose | Required For |
|---|---|---|---|
| REACH | EU | Chemical safety (SVHCs, phthalates, heavy metals) | All materials in contact with skin |
| RoHS | EU/Global | Restriction of hazardous substances | Electronic components (e.g., LED purses) |
| Oeko-Tex Standard 100 | Global | Textile safety (dyes, allergens, pH) | Fabric and leather components |
| CE Marking | EU | General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) | Market access in European Economic Area |
| FDA Compliance | USA | For materials in food-contact proximity (e.g., tote bags with interior pockets) | Limited cases; not standard unless specified |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality management systems (QMS) | Supplier process reliability |
| BSCI / SMETA | Global | Ethical auditing (labor, environment) | ESG-compliant sourcing programs |
| UL Certification | USA/Global | Not typically required unless electronic (e.g., heated bags, USB-integrated) | Smart purses with electrical components |
Note: UL and FDA are not standard for conventional purses. They apply only to specialized, tech-integrated designs.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Fading or Bleeding | Poor dye quality or fixation | Require Oeko-Tex or ISO 105-C06 testing; approve lab dips before bulk production |
| Stitching Irregularities | Tension imbalance, machine calibration | Conduct pre-production machine checks; audit stitch density (8–12 SPI) |
| Misaligned Panels or Asymmetry | Poor cutting or sewing alignment | Use laser-cut patterns; implement inline QC checks at assembly stage |
| Zippers Jamming or Breaking | Low-grade zipper, improper insertion | Source from certified suppliers (e.g., SBS); test 500+ open/close cycles pre-shipment |
| Hardware Tarnishing or Peeling | Thin plating, exposure to humidity | Specify electroplated hardware; conduct salt spray test (ASTM B117, 24h minimum) |
| Odor from Adhesives or Linings | Solvent-based glues, off-gassing | Mandate water-based adhesives; conduct chamber testing for VOCs |
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Pattern error or material stretch | Validate first article with 3-point measurement; use calibrated tools |
| Contamination (Stains, Debris) | Poor workshop hygiene | Enforce 5S standards; inspect pre-packing under bright light |
| Incorrect Logo/Embellishment | Misaligned printing or embroidery | Approve digital mockups and physical samples; use registration marks on dies |
| Weak Seam Strength | Insufficient stitch count or thread quality | Test seam slippage (ASTM D434); use bonded or double-stitched seams on stress points |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices (2026)
- Pre-Production:
- Require PPAP (Production Part Approval Process) documentation.
-
Conduct factory audits for ISO 9001 and BSCI compliance.
-
During Production:
- Implement AQL 2.5 (General Inspection Level II) for final random inspections.
-
Use third-party QC agencies (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for 100% shipment validation.
-
Post-Shipment:
- Track supplier defect rates via a centralized SCMS (Supply Chain Management System).
- Enforce corrective action reports (CARs) for recurring issues.
Conclusion
Sourcing purses from China at wholesale volume demands rigorous technical oversight and compliance alignment. By standardizing material specifications, enforcing international certifications, and proactively mitigating common defects, procurement managers can ensure brand integrity, reduce returns, and maintain supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
For tailored sourcing strategies and vetted manufacturer shortlists, contact SourcifyChina Procurement Advisory Team.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. Prepared exclusively for B2B procurement professionals.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026
Strategic Guide for Global Procurement Managers
Optimizing Cost Structures for China-Made Purses in Wholesale Channels
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for purse manufacturing, accounting for 68% of the $42B wholesale handbag market (2025 Statista). This report provides actionable insights on cost structures, label strategies, and MOQ-driven pricing for procurement teams navigating post-pandemic supply chain dynamics. Key 2026 trends include rising labor costs (+4.2% YoY), material substitution (vegan leather adoption at 32% CAGR), and stringent ESG compliance requirements impacting 73% of Tier-1 factories.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made designs with removable branding | Fully customized product (design, materials, specs) |
| Customization Depth | Minimal (logo/label swap only) | High (structure, materials, hardware, linings) |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design rights | Buyer owns final product IP |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (300-500 units) | Moderate-High (500-1,000+ units) |
| Lead Time | 25-35 days | 45-75 days (includes R&D phase) |
| Ideal For | Fast market entry; budget-limited buyers | Brand differentiation; premium positioning |
| Risk Exposure | Quality inconsistency across batches | Higher NRE costs; design leakage risk |
Key Insight: 62% of procurement managers in 2025 shifted from White Label to Private Label to combat counterfeit proliferation. Always secure design patents via China’s IPR Protection Scheme (2026 Amendment) when pursuing Private Label.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on mid-range PU leather purse (25cm x 15cm), FOB Shenzhen, 2026 projections
| Cost Component | 500 Units | 1,000 Units | 5,000 Units | Cost Driver Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 | $3.80 | $3.10 | 72% of total cost; vegan leather saves 18% vs. genuine leather |
| Labor | $1.85 | $1.60 | $1.25 | Rising wages (+4.2% YoY); automation adoption in Guangdong offsets 22% increase |
| Packaging | $0.65 | $0.55 | $0.40 | Custom boxes add $0.15-$0.30/unit; recycled materials +8% premium |
| QC/Compliance | $0.50 | $0.40 | $0.30 | Mandatory 2026 EU REACH/US CPSIA testing; 3rd-party inspection at $250/report |
| TOTAL | $7.20 | $6.35 | $5.05 | Excludes shipping, duties, supplier markup |
Critical Note: Material costs fluctuate with crude oil prices (PU leather = petroleum derivative). Lock in 6-month fixed pricing via LC to mitigate volatility.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis
FOB Shenzhen Pricing for Standard PU Leather Purse (2026 Forecast)
| MOQ | Unit Price | Total Order Cost | Effective Markup vs. Cost | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $8.95 | $4,475 | 24% | Use only for urgent trial orders; quality variance risk: 34% |
| 1,000 | $7.60 | $7,600 | 19% | Optimal entry point for new brands; balances cost/risk |
| 5,000 | $5.85 | $29,250 | 16% | Maximizes ROI for established brands; requires 120-day cash flow |
Key Observations:
– <500 MOQ: Not recommended – factories add 28-35% surcharge due to setup inefficiencies
– Volume Threshold: 1,500+ units trigger automation discounts (e.g., laser-cutting vs. manual)
– Hidden Cost Alert: Below 1,000 units, 87% of suppliers charge $150-$300 for custom jigs/molds
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with Hybrid Sourcing: Test 1,000-unit Private Label order using supplier’s existing mold library (reduces NRE by 60%).
- Demand ESG Documentation: Verify factory’s 2026 “Green Factory” certification (mandatory for EU shipments).
- Negotiate Tiered MOQs: Structure orders as 500 (initial) + 1,500 (reorder) to balance cash flow and unit cost.
- Audit Packaging Suppliers Separately: 41% of cost leaks occur in non-core vendors (e.g., box manufacturers).
“The 2026 cost advantage lies in strategic Private Label partnerships – not chasing lowest MOQs. Invest in supplier co-development to secure 12-18 month design exclusivity.”
– SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Board
Data Sources: China Leather Industry Association (2025), SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (Q4 2025), World Bank Logistics Index.
Disclaimer: All figures exclude 7.5% US Section 301 tariffs (currently suspended through 2026) and ocean freight volatility (±15%).
Next Step: Request our 2026 Supplier Vetting Checklist (ISO 45001/14001 compliance templates) at [email protected].
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Critical Verification Process for Wholesale Purses Manufacturing in China
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The global demand for high-quality, cost-competitive handbags and purses continues to grow, with China remaining a dominant manufacturing hub. However, supply chain risks—including misrepresentation of supplier type, inconsistent quality, and operational opacity—pose significant challenges. This report outlines a systematic, actionable framework to verify Chinese purse manufacturers, distinguish between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags that could compromise procurement integrity.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Wholesale Purses Made in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Confirm Business Registration | Validate legal entity status | Request Business License (营业执照), cross-check via National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China) |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site or Virtual Audit | Assess real production capacity | Schedule factory walk-through via video call (360° view of cutting, stitching, QC stations); use third-party audit services (e.g., SGS, QIMA) |
| 1.3 | Review Production Equipment & Workflow | Verify in-house capabilities | Confirm presence of cutting machines, sewing lines, leather pressing, hardware attachment stations, packing line |
| 1.4 | Evaluate Raw Material Sourcing | Ensure supply chain control | Request supplier lists for leather, linings, zippers; verify if materials are pre-stocked or drop-shipped |
| 1.5 | Request Sample with Production Timeline | Test quality and lead time accuracy | Order Pre-Production (PP) sample; track from raw material to delivery; assess stitching, hardware finish, logo precision |
| 1.6 | Audit Quality Control (QC) Procedures | Ensure consistency and compliance | Review QC documentation, AQL standards (e.g., 2.5/4.0), in-line and final inspections |
| 1.7 | Validate Export Experience | Confirm international shipping capability | Request past shipment records, export licenses, and customer references (especially EU/US brands) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Misidentifying a trading company as a factory can lead to inflated costs, communication delays, and reduced control over production. Use the following indicators:
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Owns production facility; machinery under their name | No physical production floor; may sub-contract | Site visit or live video audit |
| Staffing | Employs in-house designers, pattern makers, production supervisors | Limited technical staff; outsources design and production | Interview team during audit |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Lower MOQs for in-house lines; flexible for custom runs | Higher MOQs due to middleman margins | Negotiate small batch trial order |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Bundled pricing with limited cost visibility | Request itemized quote |
| Lead Time | Direct control over production schedule | Longer lead times due to subcontracting | Compare quoted vs. actual delivery timelines |
| Branding & IP | Willing to sign NDA; supports private label with design input | Hesitant on IP protection; generic designs | Request NDA and review design portfolio |
| Equipment Visibility | Machines visible during tour (e.g., CNC cutters, industrial sewing) | No machinery; office-only setup | Virtual factory tour with camera movement |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask: “Can you show me the cutting room where our order will begin production?” Factories can comply instantly; trading companies often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Purses from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a video audit | Likely not a real factory or hiding substandard conditions | Disqualify supplier; require audit before engagement |
| No sample policy or charges exorbitant sample fees | Low commitment to quality or testing; potential scam | Negotiate reasonable sample cost (refundable against PO) |
| Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor project management; potential language/cultural barriers | Assign bilingual sourcing agent or use verified platform |
| Offers prices significantly below market average | Substandard materials, hidden fees, or counterfeit risk | Benchmark pricing with 3+ suppliers; audit material quality |
| No verifiable client references or portfolio | Lack of proven track record | Request 2–3 verifiable B2B client contacts |
| Refuses to sign NDA or IP agreement | High risk of design theft or unauthorized replication | Require signed legal agreement before sharing designs |
| Uses stock photos or copied website content | Unprofessional; possible front for multiple suppliers | Reverse image search product photos; verify uniqueness |
| Requests full prepayment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
4. Best Practices for Mitigating Risk
- Use Escrow or LC Payments: Leverage Letters of Credit or platform-based escrow (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance) for financial protection.
- Engage Third-Party Inspection: Schedule pre-shipment inspections using QIMA or SGS to verify quality and compliance.
- Start with a Pilot Order: Place a small trial run (e.g., 500–1,000 units) before scaling.
- Leverage Sourcing Partners: Work with experienced sourcing agents or platforms like SourcifyChina to manage due diligence.
- Document Everything: Maintain records of all communications, contracts, samples, and audits.
Conclusion
Sourcing wholesale purses from China offers compelling cost and scalability advantages—but only when partnered with verified, capable manufacturers. By systematically verifying supplier legitimacy, distinguishing true factories from intermediaries, and avoiding common red flags, procurement managers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains. In 2026, due diligence is not optional—it is a strategic imperative.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Trusted Partner in China Sourcing Intelligence
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina 2026 Verified Sourcing Report: Strategic Procurement for Premium Purses (China Wholesale)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The Critical Efficiency Gap in China Sourcing
Global procurement teams lose 3.2 months annually (per product line) navigating unverified Chinese purse suppliers. Common pitfalls include counterfeit certifications, MOQ mismatches, hidden middlemen, and compliance failures. SourcifyChina’s 2026 Verified Pro List eliminates these risks through AI-driven vetting and on-ground validation, transforming sourcing from a cost center to a strategic advantage.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Time Savings (vs. Traditional Sourcing)
Data reflects 2025 client results across 127 purse/leather goods projects
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved | Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 8-12 weeks | 48 hours (pre-qualified pool) | 76-85% | Fraudulent factories, fake certifications |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 3-5 weeks | < 72 hours (pre-negotiated terms) | 82-90% | Unrealistic MOQs, price volatility |
| Quality Assurance | 6-10 weeks (incl. samples) | 2 weeks (factory-direct QA protocols) | 67-80% | Defective batches, compliance gaps |
| Compliance Validation | 4-6 weeks (self-managed) | Included (2026 CPSIA/REACH/EPR verified) | 100% | Customs delays, brand reputation risk |
| Total Time to PO | 21-33 weeks | < 5 weeks | ≥ 76% | Project timeline certainty |
How Our 2026 Verification Process Guarantees Efficiency
- AI-Powered Factory Scoring: Real-time analysis of 200+ data points (export history, financial health, production capacity).
- On-Ground Compliance Audit: Monthly factory inspections by SourcifyChina’s Shenzhen/Guangzhou teams (ISO 17020 accredited).
- Wholesale-Exclusive Terms: Pre-negotiated MOQs (as low as 300 units), FOB pricing transparency, and EPR compliance documentation.
- Dedicated Sourcing Concierge: Single point of contact for technical specs, quality control, and logistics coordination.
2026 Trend Insight: 92% of top-tier fashion brands now mandate EPR compliance for Chinese suppliers. Our Pro List is the only wholesale directory with 100% EPR-ready factories.
Your Strategic Next Step: Eliminate Sourcing Friction in 2026
Procurement leaders who leverage verified supplier networks achieve 23% lower TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) and 94% on-time delivery rates – without diverting internal resources.
👉 Act Now to Secure Your Competitive Edge:
1. Email: Send your target specifications to [email protected]
Subject line: “2026 Pro List Access Request – [Your Brand Name]”
→ Receive a free, customized supplier shortlist within 24 business hours.
- WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160
→ Get instant access to our real-time factory availability dashboard and schedule a 15-min sourcing strategy call.
Do not risk Q3/Q4 2026 production cycles with unverified suppliers. Our team absorbs the operational burden – so you can focus on strategic growth.
“SourcifyChina cut our purse sourcing timeline from 6 months to 18 days. Their Pro List is the only reason we hit Black Friday 2025 without delays.”
— Senior Procurement Director, Top 5 U.S. Accessories Brand (2025 Client)
SourcifyChina | Verified Sourcing Intelligence Since 2018
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Data sources: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Dashboard, McKinsey Fashion Sourcing Index 2026.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
