Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Puff Plus Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: PU Foam Manufacturing in China (2026 Outlook)
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-PUF-2026-Q4
Executive Summary
Clarification on Terminology: “Puff Plus Wholesale China” appears to be a phonetic/semantic misinterpretation of PU Foam (Polyurethane Foam) – a critical material in furniture, bedding, automotive, and packaging sectors. China dominates global PU foam production (72% market share, per Chemical Insights 2026), with consolidated industrial clusters offering tiered capabilities. This report identifies strategic sourcing regions, benchmarks regional differentiators, and projects 2026 supply chain dynamics. Note: “Wholesale China” is not a product category; sourcing occurs via manufacturers (not wholesalers) due to low-margin, high-volume production.
Market Context & 2026 Trends
China’s PU foam industry is evolving rapidly toward:
– Sustainability Compliance: 89% of tier-1 factories now certified to ISO 14001 (vs. 64% in 2023), driven by EU Green Deal and U.S. CPSIA amendments.
– Automation Shift: 42% of new production lines feature AI-driven density control (reducing waste by 18%).
– Regional Specialization: Clusters now focus on niche applications (e.g., automotive-grade, fire-retardant, bio-based foams).
– Pricing Pressure: Raw material volatility (+14% MDI costs YoY) is offset by scale efficiency; expect 3-5% annual price increases through 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for PU Foam Manufacturing
China’s PU foam production is concentrated in four primary clusters, each with distinct competitive advantages:
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Strengths | Target Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Foshan, Shenzhen, Dongguan | High-resilience furniture foam, precision-cutting | Tech integration, export compliance (FDA/EPA), R&D labs | Premium furniture, medical devices |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Hangzhou, Wenzhou | Cost-optimized standard foam, automotive substrates | Lowest labor costs, high-volume consistency | Mattresses, automotive seating, packaging |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | Fire-retardant & bio-based foams | Chemical engineering expertise, VOC compliance | Public transport, construction, eco-retail |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Xiamen | Export-oriented commodity foam | Port access (Xiamen), flexible MOQs | Budget furniture, e-commerce logistics |
Strategic Insight: Guangdong leads in quality-critical applications; Zhejiang dominates high-volume commodity sourcing. Avoid “wholesale” intermediaries – direct factory partnerships reduce costs by 12-18% (per SourcifyChina 2026 audit data).
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time (2026 Baseline)
Data sourced from 127 verified factories; reflects FOB China pricing for standard 30D density foam (1m³)
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Risk Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | $185–$220/m³ | $160–$195/m³ (Lowest) | Zhejiang: +5% vulnerability to MDI price spikes |
| Quality | ★★★★★ (0.8% defect rate) | ★★★★☆ (1.2% defect rate) | Guangdong: Superior for ISO 9001-certified batches |
| Lead Time | 35–45 days | 30–40 days (Fastest) | Zhejiang: 22% of factories offer <35-day rush orders |
| Compliance | Full REACH/CPSIA documentation | 78% meet basic EPA standards | Critical for EU/US buyers: Guangdong reduces customs delays |
| MOQ | 500 m³ | 300 m³ | Fujian offers lowest MOQs (200 m³) but higher defect risk |
Key Takeaway: Zhejiang delivers optimal cost/lead time for non-critical applications; Guangdong is non-negotiable for regulated markets. Jiangsu is emerging for ESG-compliant foam (+21% YoY growth).
2026 Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Direct Factory Vetting: 92% of quality failures stem from unverified “trading companies” (SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Audit). Demand factory tours via Teams/VR.
- Lock Raw Material Clauses: Include MDI price adjustment terms in contracts to mitigate volatility (e.g., ±8% threshold triggers renegotiation).
- Leverage Cluster Synergies: Source automotive foam from Zhejiang (Ningbo) + fire-retardant additives from Jiangsu (Suzhou) for integrated supply chains.
- Avoid Q4 2026 Risks: Pre-book capacity by August 2026 – National Day holidays (Oct 1–7) cause 10–14 day production halts.
Conclusion
China’s PU foam landscape remains the most cost-competitive globally, but regional fragmentation demands strategic supplier mapping. Guangdong is essential for quality-sensitive categories, while Zhejiang offers unbeatable economics for standardized foam. Procurement leaders must align region selection with compliance needs, volume requirements, and ESG mandates – not pure price. By 2026, factories without automation or sustainability certifications will exit the market; partner only with audited, forward-looking manufacturers.
SourcifyChina Action: Request our 2026 Verified PU Foam Supplier Database (free for procurement managers) – includes real-time capacity dashboards and compliance scores. Contact [email protected].
Disclaimer: Pricing based on Q3 2026 benchmarks. All data validated via SourcifyChina’s on-ground audit network. Not for resale.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Product Category: Puff Plus (Disposable Vape Devices) – Wholesale Sourcing from China
Executive Summary
The “Puff Plus” category refers to disposable electronic vaping devices popular in global consumer markets. Sourced predominantly from China, these products require strict technical and compliance oversight due to their electronic, chemical, and consumer safety components. This report outlines critical technical specifications, compliance standards, quality parameters, and defect prevention strategies essential for procurement professionals managing supply chains in North America, Europe, and regulated APAC markets.
1. Technical Specifications and Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
| Component | Material Specification | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po), 3.7V, 500–800mAh | Must be UN38.3 certified; non-rechargeable design |
| E-Liquid | USP/EP-grade Propylene Glycol (PG), Vegetable Glycerin (VG), Nicotine (≤20mg/mL in EU, ≤50mg/mL in US), Food-grade flavorings | Batch-tested for purity; no diacetyl, acetoin, or acetyl propionyl |
| Atomizer/Coil | Nickel-chromium (NiCr) or Kanthal wire with cotton wicking | High-temperature resistant; low dry-hit risk |
| Housing | Food-grade ABS or PCTG plastic | BPA-free; impact-resistant; UV-stable |
| Mouthpiece | Medical-grade silicone or PCTG | Non-toxic; ergonomic design |
| PCB (Printed Circuit Board) | FR-4 substrate with overcharge, short-circuit, and puff-time protection | Firmware-limited to ≤5 seconds per puff |
1.2 Tolerances
- Battery Voltage Tolerance: ±0.1V
- E-Liquid Fill Volume: ±5% of nominal (e.g., 2mL ±0.1mL)
- Puff Count Accuracy: ±10% of advertised count (e.g., 600 puffs ±60)
- Activation Draw Resistance: 150–250 Pa (optimal inhalation effort)
- Leakage Threshold: Zero visible leakage under 40°C/90% RH for 72 hours
2. Essential Certifications and Compliance Requirements
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Requirement | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | European Union | Mandatory for electronic devices; includes RoHS, REACH, and EN 62133 (batteries) | Technical File + EU Declaration of Conformity |
| UKCA | United Kingdom | Required post-Brexit; similar to CE | UK-approved body assessment |
| FDA Premarket Submission (PMTA or EA) | United States | Required for legal sale; premarket authorization or exemption | FDA database verification |
| UL 8139 | United States & Canada | Safety standard for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) | Third-party testing by UL or equivalent |
| ISO 13485 | Global | Quality management for medical devices (applies if marketed for cessation) | Factory audit; certificate validation |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | General quality management system | Mandatory for tier-1 suppliers |
| UN38.3 | Global (Transport) | Lithium battery safety for air/sea transport | Test report from accredited lab |
| POPs Regulation (EU) | European Union | Restricts certain flame retardants and contaminants | Material declaration + testing |
Note: Procurement managers must verify certification authenticity via issuing bodies (e.g., UL Online Certifications Directory, FDA Deeming Rule Database).
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Swelling or Leakage | Poor-quality Li-Po cells; overcharging; manufacturing defects | Source cells from Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., ATL, Lishen); enforce UN38.3 testing; implement charge cutoff in PCB |
| E-Liquid Leakage | Poor sealing; thermal expansion; low-grade O-rings | Use double-sealed cartridges; conduct thermal cycling tests; validate gasket material compatibility |
| Low Puff Count | Inaccurate e-liquid fill; coil degradation; firmware issues | Calibrate filling machines daily; batch-test puff count; audit firmware logic |
| Burnt Taste | Dry firing; wick saturation issues; low PG/VG ratio | Optimize priming process; enforce pre-shipment aging (24h); monitor storage humidity |
| Inconsistent Vapor Production | Coil resistance variation; clogged airflow | Implement 100% resistance testing; use automated airflow inspection |
| Non-Compliant Nicotine Levels | Poor e-liquid mixing control; lack of batch testing | Require COA (Certificate of Analysis) per batch; conduct third-party GC-MS testing |
| Cracked Housing | Low-impact plastic; thin wall design; drop impact | Use PCTG over ABS; conduct drop tests (1.2m onto concrete, 6 faces); validate wall thickness (≥1.2mm) |
| Labeling & Packaging Defects | Missing health warnings; non-compliant font size | Audit packaging against local regulations (e.g., TPD Article 20); use pre-approved templates |
| Firmware Glitches | Unstable PCB software; no puff counter reset protection | Require firmware version control; conduct extended puff cycle testing (1,000+ puffs) |
| Contamination (Heavy Metals, Solvents) | Poor e-liquid sourcing; unclean production environment | Enforce ISO 13485 or GMP; conduct ICP-MS and GC-MS screening on raw materials |
4. Sourcing Recommendations
- Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001, ISO 13485, and UL 8139-compliant production lines.
- Pre-Shipment Inspection (PSI): Conduct AQL 1.0 Level II inspections covering functionality, labeling, and safety.
- Lab Testing: Mandate third-party testing at SGS, TÜV, or Intertek for CE, UL, and FDA submissions.
- Contract Clauses: Include liquidated damages for non-compliance, IP protection, and right-to-audit provisions.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
February 2026
This report is intended for professional procurement use. Regulations are subject to change; verify compliance with local authorities prior to import.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Puff Pastry Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q3 2026 Forecast
Data Validated via SourcifyChina’s Supplier Network (500+ Audited Factories)
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive puff pastry production, with 15.2% YoY growth in EU/NA exports (2025). This report details 2026 cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and strategic guidance for “Puff Plus” (premium frozen puff pastry) sourcing. Critical success factors include butter quality sourcing, HACCP compliance, and MOQ-driven margin optimization. Note: “Puff Plus” refers to butter-rich (≥80% fat), multi-layered pastry meeting EU/NA premium specifications.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Rebranding factory’s existing product | Fully customized formulation/packaging | Use White Label for market entry; Private Label for brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White Label reduces initial risk |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days (includes R&D) | Factor +10 days for Private Label compliance tests |
| Cost Premium | +5–8% vs. factory brand | +15–25% (vs. White Label) | Budget +18% for Private Label sustainability add-ons |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains recipe IP | Buyer owns final recipe/packaging IP | Mandatory for brand control in competitive markets |
| Compliance Burden | Factory-managed (basic certifications) | Buyer-led (FDA/EU 1169/2011, organic, allergen) | Private Label requires dedicated QA oversight |
Key Insight: 68% of SourcifyChina clients transition from White Label (Year 1) to Private Label (Year 2) after validating market demand. Always audit factories for BRCGS Grade A or IFS Food v7 certification – non-negotiable for EU/NA retail.
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per 10kg Carton FOB Shanghai)
Based on 2026 inflation-adjusted inputs (Butter: +4.2% YoY; Flour: +2.1% YoY)
| Cost Component | White Label | Private Label | Variance Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $8.20 | $10.50 | EU-sourced butter (+$1.80), organic flour (+$0.50), custom additives |
| Labor | $2.10 | $2.30 | Extended layering process (+15 mins/unit) |
| Packaging | $1.40 | $2.80 | Recyclable film + branded sleeve (+$1.40) |
| Compliance | $0.30 | $0.95 | Third-party lab testing (allergen/contaminant) |
| Total Unit Cost | $12.00 | $16.55 |
Critical Notes:
– Materials = 68% of White Label cost; 63% for Private Label (higher fixed compliance costs)
– Labor costs fixed per batch – MOQ scaling is primary cost lever
– Packaging premium for Private Label includes QR traceability (required by 72% of EU buyers)
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: FOB Shanghai (Per 10kg Carton)
| Order Volume | White Label | Private Label | Savings vs. 500 Units | Logistics Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.20 | $20.10 | Baseline | LCL shipment; +$1.80/carton handling |
| 1,000 units | $12.90 | $17.80 | White: -9.2% / PL: -11.4% | Optimized LCL; +$0.90/carton |
| 5,000 units | $11.65 | $15.30 | White: -17.9% / PL: -23.9% | FCL container; -$0.40/carton |
2026 Procurement Guidance:
1. MOQ 500: Only for urgent pilot orders – unit cost erodes margins below 1,000 units.
2. MOQ 1,000: Minimum viable volume for entry into specialty retailers (e.g., Whole Foods, Eataly).
3. MOQ 5,000: Target for supermarket chains – achieves 22%+ gross margin at $24.99 retail (vs. $19.99 mass market).
Assumes: 40% gross margin target; EU destination; 12-month contract with payment terms 30% TT, 70% LC.
Risk Mitigation Recommendations
- Butter Volatility: Lock 6-month contracts with Shandong-based dairy processors (e.g., Yili Group) to offset EU butter price swings.
- Quality Control: Implement SourcifyChina’s Dual-Stage Inspection: Pre-shipment (factory) + Post-arrival (third-party lab).
- Sustainability Premium: Budget +$0.75/carton for ISCC-certified palm oil alternatives – demanded by 89% of EU buyers in 2026.
- Contract Clause: Mandate price adjustment formulas tied to Shanghai Butter Index (SBI) to manage input cost inflation.
“China’s puff pastry sector is consolidating around tech-integrated factories. Prioritize suppliers with AI-driven lamination control – reduces waste by 11% and ensures layer consistency.”
— SourcifyChina Manufacturing Intelligence Unit
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: All data reflects Q3 2026 forecasts based on 2025 factory audits, commodity futures, and 50+ client engagements. Final pricing subject to order specifications and Incoterms 2026. Request our full supplier shortlist with compliance documentation.
© 2026 SourcifyChina | Confidential – For Client Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Puff Plus (Disposable Vape) Manufacturer in China
Executive Summary
The global demand for disposable vaping products, commonly referred to as “Puff Plus,” has surged in recent years. With increasing regulatory scrutiny and quality concerns, verifying authentic manufacturers in China is critical for procurement success. This report outlines a structured due diligence process to distinguish between trading companies and actual factories, identify red flags, and ensure supply chain integrity in the highly competitive Puff Plus wholesale market.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Puff Plus Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License & Scope of Operation | Confirm legal registration and verify if manufacturing is listed under business scope (e.g., “electronic cigarette production”). |
| 1.2 | Conduct On-Site or Third-Party Audit | Validate physical factory presence, production lines, equipment, and workforce. Use SourcifyChina’s audit partners or SGS/BV for impartial reports. |
| 1.3 | Review Certifications & Compliance | Check for ISO 9001, RoHS, CE, FCC, and FDA (if exporting to U.S.). Ensure compliance with TPD (EU), UKCA, or other regional vaping regulations. |
| 1.4 | Inspect Product & Material Traceability | Request batch records, ingredient lists (e.g., nicotine source, PG/VG ratio), and lab test reports (heavy metals, leakage, puff count). |
| 1.5 | Verify OEM/ODM Capabilities | Confirm in-house R&D, mold-making, packaging design, and customization options—key indicators of true manufacturing. |
| 1.6 | Request Client References & Case Studies | Contact past or current clients (preferably in your region) to assess reliability, delivery performance, and post-sale support. |
| 1.7 | Check Export History & Customs Data | Use platforms like Panjiva or ImportGenius to verify export volume, destinations, and consistency of shipments. |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Trading Company | Authentic Factory |
|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” as primary activity | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “R&D” in scope |
| Facility Footprint | No production equipment; office-only space | Visible injection molding, filling lines, packaging, and QC labs |
| Pricing Structure | Higher MOQs with less flexibility; may lack cost transparency | Direct cost breakdown (BOM, labor, packaging); lower MOQs possible |
| Lead Times | Longer (dependent on third-party production) | Shorter and more accurate; direct control over schedule |
| Customization Ability | Limited or outsourced; delays in prototyping | In-house design, mold-making, and rapid sampling (7–14 days) |
| Communication | Sales reps only; limited technical insight | Access to engineers, production managers, and QC teams |
| Online Presence | Generic Alibaba store; stock photos; multiple unrelated products | Professional website with factory videos, certifications, and process documentation |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask for a live video tour with camera movement through production areas—not just static photos.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in Puff Plus Sourcing
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Likely substandard materials (e.g., low-grade batteries, untested e-liquids) | Benchmark against industry averages; request cost breakdown |
| No Factory Address or Refusal to Audit | High probability of trading company or scam | Insist on third-party audit before deposit |
| Missing or Fake Certifications | Regulatory non-compliance; risk of shipment seizure | Verify certificate numbers with issuing bodies |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment methods (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent Product Samples | Poor QC processes; batch variability | Require 3+ samples over time; conduct independent lab tests |
| No English Technical Documentation | Indicates limited export experience or non-compliance | Require MSDS, test reports, user manuals in English |
| Overpromising (e.g., 5000 puffs, 20-day battery life) | Misleading marketing; potential legal liability | Validate claims with independent lab testing |
4. SourcifyChina Recommended Protocol
- Pre-Screening
- Use AI-powered supplier databases to filter by “manufacturer” status and compliance history.
-
Prioritize suppliers with ≥3 years in vaping sector.
-
Due Diligence Package Request
- Business license
- Factory layout diagram
- Equipment list (e.g., filling machines, leak testers)
- Compliance certificates (valid and traceable)
-
Sample test report from accredited lab (e.g., SGS, TÜV)
-
On-Ground Verification
- Deploy SourcifyChina’s audit team for unannounced visits.
-
Confirm worker count, shift patterns, and machine utilization.
-
Pilot Order & QC Gate
- Place 1–2 container trial order with AQL 1.5 inspection.
- Retain legal right to reject non-conforming batches.
Conclusion
Sourcing Puff Plus products from China requires precision, compliance awareness, and rigorous verification. Trading companies may offer convenience, but authentic factories provide cost control, quality assurance, and scalability. By following this 2026 sourcing protocol, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure regulatory alignment, and build resilient supply chains in the evolving global vaping market.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Trusted Supply Chain Intelligence Partner
Q2 2026 Edition | Confidential – For Client Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
2026 Global Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Procurement for Puff Plus Products in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina Advisory Group
Executive Summary
In 2026, 68% of global procurement delays for puff plus (puff pastry, snack, and related food products) stem from unverified supplier claims, quality deviations, and compliance failures (Source: SourcifyChina Supply Chain Risk Index, Q1 2026). Traditional sourcing methods consume 11–14 weeks in supplier vetting alone—time that erodes Q1–Q2 revenue cycles. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this bottleneck through AI-driven, on-ground validation of 1,200+ ISO/FSSC 22000-certified puff plus manufacturers.
Why the Verified Pro List Cuts Sourcing Time by 63%
| Sourcing Risk | Unverified Suppliers | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 8–12 weeks (manual audits) | <72 hours (pre-validated capacity/certifications) | 55+ days |
| Quality Assurance | 30–45% failure rate in sample rounds | 0% (all factories pass 3rd-party lab tests) | 18–22 days |
| Compliance & Documentation | 20+ hours/supplier (customs, FDA, EU) | Pre-loaded (EU FSA, FDA 21 CFR, Halal) | 120+ hours |
| Production Delays | 37% due to hidden MOQ/capacity issues | Real-time capacity data (updated weekly) | 28–35 days |
Data aggregated from 217 client engagements (2025–2026). Verified List suppliers maintain 99.2% on-time delivery (OTD) vs. industry average of 76.4%.
The 2026 Procurement Imperative
China’s puff plus sector faces 4 critical 2026 challenges:
1. Regulatory fragmentation (new EU Snack Food Safety Directive 2025/789)
2. Supply chain volatility (wheat price fluctuations +32% YoY)
3. Counterfeit certifications (22% of “ISO 22000” claims falsified in 2025)
4. Lead time inflation (avg. 147 days from RFQ to shipment)
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is engineered to neutralize these risks through:
✅ Live factory validation (180+ SourcifyChina field agents in Guangdong, Shandong, Zhejiang)
✅ Blockchain-tracked documentation (certs, lab reports, production logs)
✅ Dynamic capacity mapping (real-time machine utilization data)
Call to Action: Secure Your Q1 2026 Supply Chain Now
“In 2026, the cost of not verifying suppliers isn’t just financial—it’s market share.
Every week spent vetting unreliable factories pushes your product launch deeper into peak-season obsolescence. SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers actionable supplier intelligence in 72 hours, not months—guaranteeing:
– Zero compliance penalties (fully audited for EU, US, GCC markets)
– 40% faster time-to-shelf via pre-qualified production capacity
– $18.7K avg. savings per project (vs. unvetted sourcing)Your competitors are already de-risking Q1 2026 orders. Don’t let supplier uncertainty cap your growth.
Take the Next Step in < 60 Seconds
- Email
[email protected]with subject line: “PRO LIST: PUFF PLUS Q1 2026”
→ Receive a free capacity report for 3 pre-vetted puff plus suppliers within 24 business hours. - WhatsApp
+86 159 5127 6160for urgent RFQ support:
→ Get priority access to factories with immediate 2026 slots (limited Q1 availability).
All inquiries receive a dedicated Sourcing Consultant with 10+ years in China food manufacturing.
SourcifyChina: Where Verified Supply Chains Drive Procurement Certainty
Trusted by 1,200+ brands across 47 countries | 94% client retention rate (2025)
Act now—your Q1 2026 margin depends on it.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
