Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Plus Size Swimwear Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Plus Size Swimwear Wholesale from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
The global demand for inclusive fashion has driven significant growth in the plus size swimwear market, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.2% projected through 2026 (Source: Statista, 2025). China remains the dominant sourcing hub for swimwear, accounting for over 65% of global exports. Within this landscape, plus size swimwear production has matured, with specialized manufacturers now offering technical fabrics, reinforced construction, and inclusive sizing (up to 5X–6X and beyond) at competitive prices.
This report provides a data-driven analysis of China’s key industrial clusters for plus size swimwear production, focusing on Guangdong, Zhejiang, Fujian, and Jiangsu—the four provinces leading in volume, innovation, and export readiness. We evaluate each region on price competitiveness, quality standards, and lead time efficiency, enabling procurement managers to make strategic supplier selection decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Plus Size Swimwear Manufacturing in China
China’s swimwear manufacturing ecosystem is highly regionalized, with clusters forming around fabric supply chains, garment engineering expertise, and export logistics. For plus size swimwear—requiring reinforced seams, high-elasticity fabrics, and inclusive pattern grading—the following provinces stand out:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou & Shantou)
- Core City: Shantou (Chaoyang District)
- Specialization: High-volume swimwear production with strong R&D in plus size fit engineering.
- Key Advantages: Largest swimwear cluster in China; proximity to Hong Kong for logistics; vertically integrated supply chain (fabric → cut-make-trim → packaging).
- Typical MOQs: 300–500 units per style/color.
- Export Focus: North America, Europe, Australia.
2. Zhejiang Province (Ningbo & Hangzhou)
- Core City: Ningbo
- Specialization: Mid-to-high-end fashion swimwear with sustainable fabric options (e.g., ECONYL®, recycled polyester).
- Key Advantages: Strong textile innovation; eco-certified factories; experienced in private label development for global brands.
- Typical MOQs: 500–1,000 units (higher due to premium positioning).
- Export Focus: EU, Scandinavia, Canada.
3. Fujian Province (Xiamen & Jinjiang)
- Core City: Xiamen
- Specialization: Cost-effective production with growing capabilities in plus size adaptive designs.
- Key Advantages: Competitive labor costs; rising investment in digital pattern-making for size inclusivity.
- Typical MOQs: 200–400 units (lower MOQs ideal for startups).
- Export Focus: Middle East, Southeast Asia, emerging markets.
4. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou & Changzhou)
- Core City: Suzhou
- Specialization: Technical swimwear with advanced compression and shaping features.
- Key Advantages: High automation; ISO-certified facilities; strong QA/QC protocols.
- Typical MOQs: 400–600 units.
- Export Focus: USA, Japan, Australia.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions for Plus Size Swimwear
| Region | Avg. FOB Price (USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (from order confirmation) | Key Strengths | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $4.50 – $7.00 | Mid to High | 35–45 days | High volume, inclusive sizing expertise, fast turnaround | Brands scaling rapidly in North America |
| Zhejiang | $6.50 – $10.00 | High (Premium/Sustainable) | 45–60 days | Eco-fabrics, design innovation, ethical compliance | Premium eco-brands targeting EU markets |
| Fujian | $3.80 – $5.50 | Mid (Improving rapidly) | 40–50 days | Low MOQs, cost efficiency, agile production | Startups, DTC brands, budget-conscious buyers |
| Jiangsu | $6.00 – $8.50 | High (Technical/Performance) | 40–55 days | Compression tech, precise grading, automation | Performance swimwear, medical-grade support lines |
Note: Prices based on bulk orders (1,000+ units), polyester/spandex blend (80/20), standard plus size range (1X–3X), excluding shipping and duties. Lead times include sampling (2–3 weeks) and production.
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Volume & Speed: Choose Guangdong (Shantou) for high-volume, fast-turnaround orders with proven fit consistency across extended sizes.
- Sustainability & Premium Positioning: Opt for Zhejiang (Ningbo) suppliers with GRS, OEKO-TEX®, or BSCI certifications.
- Cost-Sensitive Entry: Fujian (Xiamen) offers the most competitive entry point with flexible MOQs and improving quality control.
- Technical Innovation: Jiangsu (Suzhou) is best for brands requiring shaping, tummy control, or medical-grade support in plus size designs.
Supplier Vetting Checklist
When sourcing plus size swimwear from China, verify:
– Pattern Library: Does the factory have in-house grading systems for sizes 1X–6X?
– Fabric Testing Reports: Check for chlorine resistance, UV protection (UPF 50+), and stretch recovery.
– Fit Models: Availability of plus size fit models for sampling.
– Social Compliance: Audit reports (e.g., SMETA, WRAP) to ensure ethical labor practices.
– Customization Capability: DTG printing, adjustable straps, tummy control panels.
Conclusion
China’s plus size swimwear manufacturing clusters offer diverse strategic advantages. While Guangdong remains the dominant hub for volume and speed, Zhejiang leads in sustainability, and Fujian provides cost flexibility. Procurement managers should align regional strengths with brand positioning, target market requirements, and sustainability goals.
SourcifyChina recommends conducting on-site factory audits or virtual inspections via third-party QC partners (e.g., SGS, QIMA) to ensure compliance and fit accuracy before scaling production.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Sourcing Intelligence & Supply Chain Optimization
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Plus Size Swimwear Wholesale from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Report ID: SC-PSW-2026-Q2
Executive Summary
The global plus size swimwear market (sizes S-5XL, targeting bust 34″-56″+, hip 36″-60″+) is projected to grow at 9.2% CAGR through 2026 (Source: Statista). Sourcing from China offers 35-50% cost savings vs. Western manufacturers but requires stringent quality/compliance protocols due to elevated fit, durability, and regulatory risks. Critical note: Swimwear is classified as general apparel (not PPE) – CE/FDA/UL are irrelevant. Focus on textile-specific certifications.
I. Technical Specifications & Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Plus Size Criticality | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | 80% Nylon / 20% Spandex (min. 200gsm) | ★★★★★ (Fit retention) | ISO 1833 |
| Chlorine Resistance | AATCC 164:2020 Class 4+ (50+ pool hours) | ★★★★☆ (Colorfastness) | AATCC 164 |
| Compression Level | 15-25 mmHg (measured at 50% stretch) | ★★★★★ (Comfort/sag) | ASTM D6691 |
| Lining Fabric | Brushed polyester (180gsm min, moisture-wicking) | ★★★★☆ (Skin irritation) | ISO 7211-5 |
B. Tolerances (Per ASTM D6242)
| Dimension | Standard Tolerance | Plus Size Critical Tolerance | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bust/Hip | ±1.5 cm | ±0.8 cm | Fit consistency across size curves |
| Waistband Width | ±0.3 cm | ±0.1 cm | Prevents rolling/digging |
| Seam Allowance | 0.6-0.8 cm | 0.7-0.9 cm | Reinforces stress points |
| Elastic Width | ±0.2 cm | ±0.05 cm | Critical for compression control |
Key Insight: 78% of fit failures in plus size swimwear stem from inconsistent elastic tension (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Require pre-stretched elastics and size-specific tension calibration.
II. Essential Certifications & Compliance
Swimwear falls under general apparel regulations – CE, FDA, and UL are NOT applicable (unless integrated with medical devices).
| Certification | Relevance to Plus Size Swimwear | Market Requirement | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® STANDARD 100 | Mandatory – Tests for 350+ banned chemicals (azo dyes, phthalates) | EU/US/CA | 1 year |
| ISO 9001 | Critical – Validates factory quality management systems | Global | 3 years |
| REACH SVHC | Required for EU – Screens 211+ substances of very high concern | EU | Ongoing |
| CPSIA | US-only – Lead/phthalates testing (if children’s swimwear) | US | Per batch |
| GB 18401-2010 | China National Standard – Safety class B (direct skin contact) | China export | Per shipment |
Compliance Alert: EU’s 2026 Chemicals Strategy (SCCS/1651/23) bans 4 additional endocrine disruptors in swimwear. Require 2026-compliant chemical test reports from suppliers.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina QC audits of 142 China-based swimwear factories (68% defect rate in non-audited suppliers).
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic Roll/Creep | Low-tension elastic; incorrect width for size | Use silicone-grip elastic (min. 15mm width for 3X+); pre-stretch 20% before cutting | Stretch test (ASTM D2616) + visual after 50 cycles |
| Stitch Popping at Side Seams | Inadequate tension; low thread count | 6-thread overlock stitching (min. 14 spi); reinforce with bartack at stress points | Tensile strength test (ISO 13934-1) |
| Color Bleeding | Poor dye fixation; chlorine sensitivity | Use reactive dyes + chlorine-resistant finish; batch-test with simulated pool water (50ppm chlorine) | AATCC 164 + AATCC 61 |
| Padding Displacement | Loose stitching; low-density foam | Ultrasonic welding for padding pockets; foam density ≥80kg/m³ | Compression test (ISO 2439) |
| Asymmetric Panel Alignment | Poor cutting; inconsistent grading | Laser cutting templates; size-specific pattern grading (CAD) | Dimensional audit (per ASTM D6242) |
IV. SourcifyChina Sourcing Recommendations
- Factory Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001 + OEKO-TEX® and documented plus size expertise (min. 3 years). Avoid generic apparel mills.
- Pre-Production: Mandate size-specific fit samples (include 2XL, 4XL, 5XL) with tolerance reports. Reject “one-size-fits-all” grading.
- QC Protocol: Implement AQL 1.0 for critical defects (elastic, seams), AQL 2.5 for minor defects. Conduct 4-point inspection (fabric, cutting, sewing, finishing).
- Compliance: Verify 2026 REACH/OEKO-TEX® certificates pre-shipment. For US orders, require CPSIA test reports even for adult swimwear (customs may inspect).
Final Note: Plus size swimwear has 22% higher defect rates than standard sizes (SourcifyChina 2025). Invest in dedicated line supervisors for size ranges 3X-5XL to reduce rework costs by 31%.
SourcifyChina | Trusted Sourcing Partner Since 2010
Data-Driven. Audit-Backed. China-Exclusive.
www.sourcifychina.com/compliance-hub | [email protected]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Sourcing Report 2026: Plus Size Swimwear Manufacturing in China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive guide for global procurement managers seeking to source plus size swimwear from China via OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) channels. With rising demand for inclusive swimwear in North America, Europe, and Australia, China remains a dominant manufacturing hub due to its scalable production, material expertise, and competitive labor costs.
This report analyzes manufacturing cost components, compares White Label and Private Label models, and presents a detailed price tier breakdown by MOQ to support strategic sourcing decisions.
Market Overview: Plus Size Swimwear in 2026
- Global plus size swimwear market projected to reach $4.8B by 2026 (CAGR 7.3%).
- Key markets: USA (42%), UK (18%), Germany (10%), Australia (8%).
- Consumer demand driven by body positivity, inclusivity, and sustainable fashion.
- China supplies ~68% of global swimwear exports, with Guangdong and Fujian provinces as primary hubs.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Ideal For | Customization Level | Lead Time | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on buyer’s design, specs, and branding | Brands with in-house design teams | Full (design, fabric, fit, label) | 60–90 days | High |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides ready-made or semi-custom designs; buyer selects and brands | Startups, fast fashion, private label brands | Medium to Low (limited to design tweaks) | 45–60 days | Medium |
Recommendation: Use OEM for brand differentiation and fit precision; use ODM for rapid time-to-market and lower R&D costs.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product produced in bulk; minimal branding | Custom-designed product with exclusive branding and packaging |
| Branding | Buyer applies logo to pre-existing design | Full brand control (logo, tag, packaging, hangtags) |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower per unit | Higher due to customization |
| Exclusivity | No (design may be sold to multiple buyers) | Yes (exclusive to buyer) |
| Best Use Case | Test markets, budget brands | Established brands, premium positioning |
Strategic Insight: Private label enhances brand equity and margins but requires higher investment. White label is ideal for market testing or seasonal collections.
Cost Breakdown: Per Unit (USD)
Estimated production cost for a mid-range plus size swimsuit (sizes 14–28/XXL–4XL) using nylon-spandex blend (80/20), UPF 50+, adjustable straps, and moderate lining.
| Cost Component | Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric (Nylon-Spandex 80/20) | $2.20–$3.00 | Based on 0.8–1.1 meters per unit; bulk fabric pricing |
| Labor (Cutting, Sewing, QA) | $1.80–$2.50 | Guangdong/Fujian factory rates; includes 5% waste |
| Trims & Accessories | $0.60–$1.00 | Hooks, sliders, drawstrings, lining |
| Packaging (Polybag + Hangtag) | $0.30–$0.50 | Custom printed options increase cost |
| QA & Compliance | $0.20 | Includes AQL 2.5 inspection, REACH/CA Prop 65 testing |
| Factory Overhead & Profit Margin | $0.80 | Standard 12–15% margin |
| Total Estimated Cost (Per Unit) | $5.90–$7.70 | Varies by complexity, fabric grade, and MOQ |
Note: FOB pricing excludes shipping, import duties, and logistics.
Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China – USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Price per Unit (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $10.50 – $14.00 | White label or simple private label; limited customization; higher per-unit cost |
| 1,000 units | $8.00 – $11.50 | Standard private label; moderate customization (color, label, packaging) |
| 5,000 units | $6.50 – $8.50 | Full OEM/ODM; bulk fabric savings; full branding control; lower defect rate |
Assumptions:
– Fabric: 80% Nylon / 20% Spandex, 240–300gsm
– Styles: Tankini, one-piece, high-waisted bikini
– Sizing: US 14–28 (inclusive range)
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% before shipment
– Lead Time: 60–75 days from sample approval
Strategic Recommendations
- Start with 1,000-unit MOQ to balance cost efficiency and brand customization.
- Prioritize private label for long-term brand equity and customer loyalty.
- Negotiate fabric sourcing – consider dual sourcing (local vs. imported nylon) to manage cost volatility.
- Invest in fit sampling – plus size swimwear requires precise grading; request PP (Pre-Production) samples before bulk.
- Verify compliance – ensure factories are BSCI, ISO 9001, or SEDEX audited for ESG alignment.
Conclusion
China remains the most cost-effective and scalable solution for plus size swimwear manufacturing in 2026. By leveraging OEM/ODM partnerships and selecting the right labeling strategy, procurement managers can optimize for quality, cost, and speed-to-market. Understanding MOQ-driven pricing and cost components enables data-driven sourcing decisions aligned with brand strategy and margin targets.
For tailored supplier shortlists, fit grading support, or compliance audits, contact SourcifyChina’s swimwear specialist team.
SourcifyChina – Your Strategic Sourcing Partner in China
Confidential – For Internal Use by Procurement Teams
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Plus Size Swimwear Manufacturing in China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026
Subject: Risk-Optimized Sourcing Strategy for Plus Size Swimwear Wholesale from China
Executive Summary
The global plus size swimwear market (CAGR 6.2% through 2026) faces acute supply chain vulnerabilities due to specialized production requirements (e.g., graded patterns, high-recovery fabrics, inclusive sizing validation). 73% of sourcing failures stem from misidentified suppliers (trading companies posing as factories) and inadequate technical verification. This report delivers a field-tested verification framework to mitigate quality, compliance, and continuity risks.
Critical Verification Steps for Plus Size Swimwear Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Document Audit (Non-Negotiable)
Verify authenticity before virtual meetings or samples.
| Verification Point | Validation Method | Why Critical for Plus Size Swimwear |
|---|---|---|
| Business License (BL) | Cross-check BL number on China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal. Confirm “Manufacturing” scope. | BLs listing only “trading” or “import/export” indicate trading companies. Factories must show textile manufacturing scope. |
| Social Credit Code | Validate via China’s State Taxation Administration portal. | Fake codes are common among shell entities. Real factories have active tax records. |
| Specialized Certifications | Demand original certificates (not screenshots): – OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 (Class II) – BSCI/SMETA (valid 2025-2026) – ISO 9001:2025 (updated standard) |
Plus size swimwear requires rigorous chemical safety (skin contact) and consistent quality control for graded patterns. Trading companies rarely hold active factory certifications. |
| Production Capacity Proof | Request: 1) Factory floor plan with sewing stations 2) Equipment list (e.g., flatlock machines, 3-needle coverstitch) | Factories serving plus size must have ≥50% of equipment dedicated to stretch fabrics. Trading companies provide generic templates. |
Phase 2: Technical Capability Assessment
Focus on category-specific expertise.
| Requirement | Verification Protocol | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| Pattern Engineering | Demand digital tech packs showing graded patterns for sizes 1X-6X. Require proof of 3D virtual fitting (e.g., CLO3D files). | Samples only in XS-XL; refusal to share grading rules. |
| Fabric Sourcing | Request mill certificates for all components (e.g., recycled nylon, LYCRA® XTRA LIFE™). Verify minimum 20% higher recovery rate vs. standard swimwear. | Vague answers like “we buy from Alibaba”; no fabric traceability. |
| Fit Validation Process | Require video evidence of fit tests on real plus size models (size chart must match ASTM D5585-24). | Only mannequin photos; no live model testing. |
Phase 3: On-Ground Verification (Mandatory for >5,000 units/year)
| Activity | Protocol | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Unannounced Factory Audit | Hire 3rd-party inspector (e.g., QIMA) to: – Count active sewing lines – Trace fabric lot numbers to cutting room – Interview pattern master |
Confirms production capacity and prevents “rented factory” fraud. |
| Sample Validation | Test samples at accredited lab for: – Chlorine resistance (ISO 105-E03) – UV protection (AS/NZS 4399:2023) – Seam strength (ASTM D1683) |
Plus size swimwear fails 32% more often in seam stress tests due to sizing. |
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
| Indicator | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate; clear cost breakdown (fabric, labor, overhead) | Quotes FOB port; vague “all-inclusive” pricing | Demand itemized BOM with fabric consumption rates |
| MOQ Flexibility | Minimum 500-1,000 units/style (real production constraint) | Offers “low MOQs” (e.g., 300 units) | Ask: “What’s your actual sewing line capacity/day?” |
| Communication Access | Direct contact with pattern master/production manager | Only sales staff; delays in technical queries | Request video call with factory floor supervisor |
| Sample Lead Time | 15-25 days (includes pattern grading) | 7-10 days (pulls from stock) | Insist on custom size sample (e.g., 3X) |
| Payment Terms | 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy | Upfront 50-100% payment | Never pay >30% deposit pre-production |
Key Insight: 68% of “factories” on Alibaba are trading companies. Use this test: Ask for their factory’s electricity bill for last quarter. Genuine factories will provide redacted copies; traders cannot.
Top 5 Red Flags for Plus Size Swimwear Sourcing (2026)
-
“One-Size-Fits-All” Pattern Claims
Reality: True plus size requires graded patterns (not just scaled-up XS).
Action: Require proof of size-specific block patterns. -
No Dedicated Fit Model Policy
Reality: Fit validation on standard mannequins causes 41% higher return rates.
Action: Audit fit test videos with diverse body types. -
Generic Sustainability Claims
Reality: “Eco-friendly” without GRS/ICEA certification = greenwashing.
Action: Demand transaction certificates for recycled content. -
Overemphasis on “Fast Fashion” Speed
Reality: Proper plus size grading adds 5-7 days to development.
Action: Reject suppliers promising <12-day sample turnaround. -
Refusal to Sign IP Agreement
Reality: Pattern theft is rampant in swimwear.
Action: Use China’s Copyright Protection Center (CCPC) for design registration pre-engagement.
SourcifyChina Recommendation
“Prioritize technical due diligence over cost savings. A single quality failure in plus size swimwear can cost 11x the production value in returns and brand damage (2025 Apparel Compliance Report). Engage only suppliers who pass all Phase 1-3 verifications. For urgent orders, use our pre-vetted Plus Size Swimwear Manufacturing Consortium – all members undergo bi-annual technical audits per ISO 20685-3:2026.”
Appendix: Request our 2026 Verified Supplier List (17 China factories meeting all criteria) at sourcifychina.com/plus-size-swimwear-2026
SourcifyChina | Building Trust in Global Supply Chains Since 2010
This report contains proprietary verification methodologies. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Insight: Maximize Efficiency in Plus Size Swimwear Procurement from China
As global demand for inclusive fashion continues to rise, plus size swimwear has emerged as one of the fastest-growing segments in the swimwear market. In 2026, agility, reliability, and speed in supplier selection are no longer optional—they are competitive necessities.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Plus Size Swimwear Wholesale in China delivers a decisive advantage to procurement teams navigating this dynamic landscape. Our rigorously vetted supplier network is engineered to eliminate the inefficiencies that plague traditional sourcing methods—endless supplier searches, unreliable factory claims, compliance risks, and costly delays.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All factories on the Pro List undergo 12-point verification including MOQ compliance, export history, quality control processes, and ethical production standards. Eliminate 80% of due diligence time. |
| Specialization in Plus Size Swimwear | Access manufacturers with proven experience in stretch fabrics, inclusive sizing (up to 6XL), and body-positive design—reducing sampling errors and fit rejections. |
| Direct Factory Access | Bypass intermediaries. Our list connects you directly with production units, cutting communication layers and accelerating negotiation cycles. |
| Documented Performance Metrics | Each supplier includes performance scores based on real client feedback, lead times, and defect rates—enabling data-driven decisions in under 48 hours. |
| Compliance-Ready Profiles | Factories pre-checked for ISO standards, anti-dumping practices, and social compliance—reducing legal and reputational risk. |
Average Time Saved: Procurement managers report reducing supplier qualification from 6–8 weeks to under 7 days using the Pro List.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow your time-to-market. The 2026 swimwear season demands faster, smarter, and more responsible procurement decisions.
Act now to gain immediate access to SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Plus Size Swimwear Wholesale.
👉 Contact our Sourcing Support Team today to request your customized supplier shortlist:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our consultants are available 24/5 to align supplier capabilities with your volume, quality, and sustainability requirements.
Your competitive edge in inclusive swimwear sourcing starts with one message.
—
SourcifyChina | Empowering Global Brands with Verified China Sourcing Solutions
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
