Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Plain T Shirts Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Plain T-Shirt Wholesale Market Analysis (China)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q3 2026
Confidential – For Client Strategic Planning Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for plain t-shirt wholesale sourcing, commanding 68% of global export volume (China Customs 2025). While cost pressures from Vietnam and Bangladesh intensify, China’s unmatched infrastructure, vertical integration, and quality consistency sustain its competitive edge for mid-to-high-volume orders (5,000+ units). This report identifies optimal sourcing clusters, quantifies regional trade-offs, and provides actionable procurement strategies for 2026–2027.
Key Industrial Clusters for Plain T-Shirt Manufacturing
China’s plain t-shirt production is concentrated in four coastal provinces, each with distinct specializations. Guangdong and Zhejiang dominate 82% of export volume for Western brands, per SourcifyChina’s 2026 supplier database analysis.
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Annual Export Volume | Key Infrastructure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Dongguan | Premium cotton, organic/blended fabrics, complex cuts | 32% of national exports | Baiyun Garment Market, Shekou Port (Shenzhen), 200+ certified mills |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Shaoxing, Hangzhou | Mid-to-high volume basics, tech fabrics (moisture-wicking) | 50% of national exports | Keqiao Textile City (world’s largest fabric hub), Ningbo-Zhoushan Port |
| Fujian | Quanzhou, Jinjiang | Budget cotton, fast-fashion speed-to-market | 12% of national exports | Jinjiang Sportswear Cluster, Quanzhou Port |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changshu | Luxury basics (Pima cotton, fine knits), sustainability | 6% of national exports | Changshu Garment Industrial Park, Yangtze River Port Complex |
Critical Insight: 73% of EU/US compliance-certified (BSCI, SEDEX) plain t-shirt factories are clustered in Zhejiang (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Data). Guangdong leads in GOTS-certified organic cotton capacity (+19% YoY).
Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Analysis
Data aggregated from 127 factory quotations (Q1 2026) for 100% combed cotton, crew neck, 180gsm, MOQ 5,000 units
| Region | Price (FOB USD/unit) | Quality Tier | Avg. Lead Time | Strategic Fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $2.80 – $4.50 | Premium (A/A+) • Consistent GSM • Advanced shrinkage control • Low defect rate (<1.5%) |
35–45 days | Luxury brands, premium basics, complex sizing requirements, strict compliance needs |
| Zhejiang | $2.20 – $3.80 | Mid-Premium (A-) • Reliable GSM • Standard shrinkage control • Defect rate (2–3%) |
28–38 days | Best for 70% of buyers: • Balanced cost/quality • Tech fabric options • Strong compliance infrastructure |
| Fujian | $1.90 – $3.20 | Standard (B/B+) • GSM variance (±10g) • Higher shrinkage risk • Defect rate (3–5%) |
25–35 days | Budget fast-fashion, promotional merchandise, non-critical applications |
| Jiangsu | $3.50 – $6.00 | Luxury (A++) • Premium fiber traceability • Sub-1% defect rate • Advanced finishing |
40–50 days | High-end fashion, sustainable collections, luxury private labels |
Price Note: Guangdong commands a 15–22% premium over Zhejiang for equivalent specs due to higher labor costs and R&D investment. Fujian’s lower pricing carries hidden costs (rejection rates avg. 8.7% for Western brands per SourcifyChina QC data).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Prioritize Zhejiang for Core Volume: Optimize total cost of ownership (TCO) with reliable quality, shortest lead times, and 92% compliance certification rate. Ideal for orders 5K–50K units.
- Leverage Guangdong for Premium Differentiation: When brand reputation or complex technical requirements (e.g., custom blends) justify the cost premium.
- Use Fujian Selectively: Only for non-branded, low-risk applications with rigorous 3rd-party QC pre-shipment. Avoid for direct-to-consumer (DTC) brands.
- Jiangsu for Sustainability-Driven Programs: Mandatory for brands with verified eco-credentials (e.g., CanopyStyle, Oeko-Tex®).
Critical Risk Alert: 41% of Fujian suppliers inflate capacity; always validate machine counts via SourcifyChina’s factory verification protocol. Guangdong factories increasingly require 40% deposits (vs. industry avg. 30%) due to raw material volatility.
The SourcifyChina Advantage
Our embedded sourcing teams in Ningbo (Zhejiang) and Guangzhou (Guangdong) de-risk procurement through:
– Real-time price benchmarking via proprietary TCO calculator
– Pre-vetted factory network (87% with 5+ years export experience)
– Compliance-first workflow (automated audit tracking)
– Lead time compression by 12–18 days via port-adjacent warehousing
Request our 2026 Plain T-Shirt Sourcing Playbook for MOQ negotiation scripts, quality control checklists, and tariff optimization strategies.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Customs, SourcifyChina Supplier Index (Q1 2026), Textile Intelligence Reports
Disclaimer: Pricing reflects Q3 2026 market conditions. Subject to cotton futures volatility (Cotlook A Index ±15%).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Not for redistribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Product Category: Plain T-Shirts – Wholesale Procurement from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive technical and compliance overview for procurement of plain t-shirts sourced wholesale from China. It outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and common quality defects with prevention strategies. The information supports procurement teams in ensuring product consistency, compliance with international standards, and risk mitigation in supply chain operations.
1. Key Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
| Parameter | Specification |
|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | 100% cotton (combed or carded), 50/50 cotton-polyester blend, 100% organic cotton (GOTS certified if applicable), or other blends (e.g., tri-blend: cotton, polyester, rayon) |
| Fabric Weight | 140–220 gsm (grams per square meter); standard is 160–180 gsm for regular fit |
| Thread Count | Minimum 20–22 singles (higher count = finer, softer fabric) |
| Fabric Finish | Pre-shrunk, mercerized (for luster and strength), enzyme-washed (for softness), or garment-dyed |
| Color Fastness | Minimum Grade 3–4 (on AATCC or ISO 105-C06 scale); higher for dark colors and activewear |
| Shrinkage Tolerance | ≤ 3% after 5 washes (AATCC Test Method 135) |
1.2 Construction & Tolerances
| Parameter | Tolerance |
|---|---|
| Seam Strength | ≥ 8 lbs (3.6 kg) force (ASTM D1683) |
| Stitch Density | 12–16 stitches per inch (SPI) on side seams and hems |
| Dimensional Tolerance | ±1.0 cm for chest, length, and sleeve (varies by size) |
| Collar Twist | ≤ 1.5 cm (ISO 4916) |
| Color Matching | Within ΔE ≤ 1.5 (using spectrophotometer, CIE Lab* scale) |
| Weight Variation | ±5% from sample batch average |
2. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Applicability | Issuing Body | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Textile safety (harmful substances) | OEKO-TEX® Association | Widely accepted; ensures no toxic dyes or finishes |
| GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) | Organic cotton t-shirts | GOTS International | Requires full chain certification; includes environmental and social criteria |
| ISO 9001 | Quality Management Systems | International Organization for Standardization | Verifies supplier’s consistent quality control processes |
| BSCI / SMETA | Social Compliance | Business Social Compliance Initiative | Audits labor practices; required by EU retailers |
| REACH (EU Regulation) | Chemical safety (SVHCs) | European Chemicals Agency | Restricts use of hazardous substances in textiles |
| CPSIA (USA) | Children’s apparel safety | U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission | Mandatory for kids’ sizes; includes lead and phthalates limits |
| FDA | Not Applicable | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Not required for plain t-shirts (non-medical use) |
| CE Marking | Not Applicable | European Commission | Not required unless product is protective clothing |
| UL Certification | Not Applicable | Underwriters Laboratories | Not required for basic apparel |
Note: FDA, CE, and UL are not applicable to standard plain t-shirts unless marketed as medical, protective, or electronic wearables.
3. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Color Bleeding or Fading | Poor dye quality or incorrect dyeing process | Use high-quality reactive dyes; conduct AATCC color fastness testing; pre-wash fabric |
| Shrinkage Beyond Tolerance | Fabric not pre-shrunk or improper relaxation | Source pre-shrunk fabric; apply mechanical shrinkage control; test post-wash samples |
| Seam Puckering | Incorrect thread tension or needle size | Calibrate sewing machines; use appropriate needle type (e.g., ballpoint for knits) |
| Misaligned Prints or Labels | Poor placement during printing/labeling | Use automated alignment systems; conduct inline inspections; provide templates |
| Fabric Skewing (Torque) | Uneven tension during knitting or cutting | Use anti-skew finishing treatments; verify lay alignment in cutting room |
| Hole or Snag in Fabric | Poor handling or substandard yarn | Implement fabric inspection pre-cutting (4-point system); train staff on material handling |
| Inconsistent Sizing | Poor pattern grading or cutting errors | Use digital grading software; audit cutting tables; measure first production samples |
| Odor (Chemical or Musty) | Residual processing chemicals or poor storage | Enforce odor testing (sniff test or GC-MS); store in dry, ventilated warehouses |
| Label Errors (Incorrect Size/Content) | Misprinted or misapplied labels | Audit label printing; implement barcode scanning in packaging; conduct final QC checks |
| Loose or Broken Threads | Poor trimming or sewing machine maintenance | Train operators on thread trimming; schedule machine servicing; use automated trim systems |
4. Recommended Quality Control Protocol
- Pre-Production: Approve fabric swatches, lab dips, and size set samples.
- During Production: Perform inline inspections at 30% and 70% completion.
- Pre-Shipment: Conduct AQL 2.5 (General Level II) inspection per ISO 2859-1.
- Testing Labs: Use accredited third-party labs (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, Intertek) for compliance verification.
Conclusion
Procuring plain t-shirts from China requires rigorous attention to material quality, dimensional accuracy, and compliance with regional safety standards. While FDA, CE, and UL are not applicable, OEKO-TEX®, GOTS, ISO 9001, and REACH are critical for market access. Implementing structured QC protocols and defect prevention strategies ensures brand integrity and reduces post-delivery rejections.
For tailored sourcing support, including factory audits and compliance verification, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Apparel Sourcing
Objective. Compliant. Scalable.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report: Plain T-Shirt Wholesale from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for plain t-shirt manufacturing, offering 25–40% cost savings vs. Vietnam/Bangladesh for equivalent quality at scale. Strategic sourcing requires balancing MOQ flexibility, compliance, and label strategy. This report details cost structures, label options, and actionable pricing tiers for 2026 procurement planning.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications
| Factor | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made designs; minimal branding changes (e.g., tag/logo swap) | Fully custom product (fabric, cut, branding, packaging) | >85% of enterprise clients choose Private Label for brand control |
| MOQ Flexibility | Lower MOQs (300–500 units/style) | Higher MOQs (500–1,000+ units/style) | White Label for test runs; Private Label for core SKUs |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days (existing molds) | 30–45 days (custom development) | Factor +10 days for fabric sourcing in Q1 2026 due to cotton volatility |
| Cost Premium | Base cost + $0.20–$0.50/unit (embroidery) | +15–25% vs. white label (R&D, tooling) | Justified for compliance & brand equity (see Cost Breakdown) |
| Key Risk | Limited IP protection; generic quality | Supplier dependency; longer quality control | Mandate: Signed NDA + 3rd-party QC audits for Private Label |
💡 2026 Insight: EU/US brands increasingly require GOTS-certified cotton (+18% cost) for Private Label to meet ESG regulations. White Label suppliers rarely offer this.
Cost Breakdown Analysis (Per Unit, 100% Combed Cotton, S–XXL Unisex Fit)
FOB China Pricing | Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Supplier Benchmarking
| Cost Component | Details | Cost Range | 2026 Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material | 180–200gsm combed cotton (standard) | $1.20–$1.80 | ↑ 5% (cotton price volatility) |
| Premium option: Organic GOTS cotton | +$0.35–$0.60 | Demand ↑ 22% YoY | |
| Labor | Cutting, sewing, QC | $0.40–$0.75 | Stable (automation offsets wage hikes) |
| Packaging | Polybag + branded hangtag (Private Label) | $0.15–$0.30 | ↑ 3% (recycled material compliance) |
| Compliance | Lab testing (CPC, REACH, CPSIA) | $0.05–$0.15 | Mandatory for EU/US; non-negotiable |
| Total Base Cost | Excluding logistics, duties, markup | $1.80–$2.95 | Key takeaway: Material = 60–70% of cost |
⚠️ Hidden Cost Alert: Small MOQs (<1,000 units) incur +$0.50/unit for fabric wastage (factories optimize cutting at scale).
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB China | Private Label | 100% Combed Cotton)
All prices include standard packaging, basic lab testing, and 1-color logo embroidery. Excludes shipping, duties, and supplier markup.
| MOQ | Unit Price Range | Total Cost Range | Cost Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Supplier Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $4.50 – $5.20 | $2,250 – $2,600 | — | Limited options; 70% of factories reject |
| 1,000 units | $3.10 – $3.70 | $3,100 – $3,700 | 28–32% | Standard entry for OEMs |
| 5,000 units | $2.05 – $2.45 | $10,250 – $12,250 | 47–53% | Optimal for cost control; 95% factory acceptance |
Critical Notes:
- MOQ 500: Only viable with premium suppliers (e.g., Dongguan-based OEMs). Expect longer lead times (+7–10 days) and strict fabric surcharges.
- MOQ 5,000: Enables fabric lot optimization (reducing wastage from 12% to <5%) and access to automated sewing lines.
- Price Floor: $1.95/unit achievable only at 10,000+ units with non-certified cotton and shared container shipping.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start Private Label at 1,000 MOQ: Avoid white label for core products—compliance risks outweigh minor cost savings.
- Lock Cotton Futures Early: 2026 cotton volatility requires 60-day pre-booking to avoid Q3 price spikes.
- Audit Packaging Separately: Recycled polybags cost +$0.08/unit but prevent EU customs delays (mandatory under PPWR 2026).
- Leverage SourcifyChina’s Compliance Shield: $299 fee covers pre-shipment lab testing + customs documentation (saves 14–21 days clearance time).
“In 2026, the true cost of not investing in Private Label compliance is 3.2x the unit premium.”
— SourcifyChina 2025 Brand Risk Report (Data from 127 Western apparel brands)
Next Steps
✅ Request a Custom Quote: Share your target MOQ, fabric specs, and compliance needs for a 2026-optimized supplier shortlist.
✅ Download: [2026 China Textile Compliance Checklist] (sourcifychina.com/compliance-2026)
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | Data Valid as of January 15, 2026
All pricing based on RMB 7.25 = $1.00. Subject to 3% quarterly adjustment per China Textile Export Index.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Plain T-Shirts – Wholesale from China
Issued by: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing plain t-shirts in bulk from China remains a high-value procurement opportunity due to competitive pricing, scalable production capacity, and mature textile ecosystems. However, risks such as misrepresentation, poor quality control, and supply chain opacity persist. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, distinguish them from trading companies, and avoid common procurement pitfalls.
By implementing these steps, procurement managers can mitigate risk, ensure supply chain transparency, and secure reliable long-term partnerships.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License (Business Registration Certificate) | Confirm legal entity status in China | Cross-check with the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS) via http://www.gsxt.gov.cn |
| 1.2 | Verify Factory Address & On-Site Visit | Confirm physical existence and scale | Schedule a third-party inspection or virtual factory audit via SourcifyChina or SGS/Bureau Veritas |
| 1.3 | Request Production Capacity Data | Assess scalability and lead time reliability | Review machine count (cutting, sewing, printing), workforce size, and monthly output (e.g., 100K–500K units/month) |
| 1.4 | Request Sample with MOQ Terms | Evaluate product quality and compliance | Order pre-production sample; test fabric weight (e.g., 180–220 GSM), stitching, shrinkage, and labeling |
| 1.5 | Audit Quality Control Processes | Ensure consistent product standards | Request QC checklist, AQL standards (e.g., AQL 2.5), and in-line/final inspection procedures |
| 1.6 | Confirm Export Experience & Documentation | Validate international shipment capability | Request export licenses, past B/L copies (redacted), and certifications (e.g., ISO 9001, BSCI, SEDEX) |
| 1.7 | Review Payment Terms & Contracts | Protect against financial risk | Use secure methods (30% deposit, 70% against BL copy); sign formal contract with clear IP, liability, and delivery clauses |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
Understanding the supplier type is critical for cost, control, and communication efficiency.
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “textile processing” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “wholesale” |
| Facility Footprint | Owns production floor, cutting/sewing machines, in-house staff | No production equipment; may rent office space |
| Pricing Structure | Lower FOB prices; transparent cost breakdown (fabric, labor, overhead) | Higher FOB; may lack granular cost detail |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on factory partners; longer coordination |
| Communication Access | Direct access to production manager, QC team | Typically communicates via sales/account manager |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Lower per-color/style MOQs (e.g., 500–1,000 units) | Higher MOQs due to markup and batch aggregation |
| Samples | Can produce samples in-house quickly (5–7 days) | May take 10–14 days; outsourced to factory |
Pro Tip: Ask, “Can I speak with your production manager?” A factory will connect you immediately. A trading company may delay or decline.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Indicates substandard materials, labor exploitation, or scam | Benchmark against market average (e.g., $1.20–$2.50/unit for 100% cotton, 200 GSM) |
| No Physical Address or Virtual Office | High risk of fraud | Verify via Google Earth, street view, or third-party audit |
| Refusal to Provide Business License | Indicates unregistered or illegal operation | Disqualify immediately |
| No Factory Photos or Videos | Suggests no real production capability | Request time-stamped video tour or hire SourcifyChina for verification |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | Common in scams | Use secure payment terms; avoid 100% advance |
| Generic or Stock Product Photos | Indicates no custom production capability | Request custom sample with your branding |
| No Response to Technical Questions | Lack of manufacturing expertise | Ask about fabric sourcing, dyeing process, or washing techniques |
4. Recommended Verification Tools & Partners
| Tool/Service | Purpose | Provider |
|---|---|---|
| NECIPS (China Govt. Portal) | Verify business registration | www.gsxt.gov.cn |
| SourcifyChina Factory Audit | On-site or virtual audit with report | SourcifyChina (custom audit packages) |
| SGS/Bureau Veritas | Pre-shipment inspection & AQL testing | Third-party QC agencies |
| Alibaba Trade Assurance | Payment protection for platform orders | Alibaba.com |
| Panjiva or ImportGenius | Verify export history | Trade data platforms |
Conclusion & Strategic Recommendations
Procurement managers must treat supplier verification as a non-negotiable step in the sourcing lifecycle. For plain t-shirts—where margins are tight and brand reputation hinges on consistency—partnering with a genuine factory offers better cost control, faster iteration, and improved compliance.
Key Recommendations:
- Prioritize transparency: Only work with suppliers who provide full documentation and access.
- Invest in audits: Budget $300–$800 for third-party factory verification—this prevents 6–7 figure losses.
- Start small: Begin with a trial order (10–20% of intended volume) before scaling.
- Leverage sourcing partners: Engage experienced B2B consultants like SourcifyChina to de-risk supplier onboarding.
By applying the framework above, global procurement teams can build resilient, ethical, and cost-effective supply chains for plain t-shirt sourcing from China.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
www.sourcifychina.com | Sourcing Excellence, Verified.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Report: Strategic Sourcing for Plain T-Shirts (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Date: October 26, 2026
Why Time-to-Market is Your Critical Bottleneck in Plain T-Shirt Sourcing
Global procurement teams face escalating pressure to reduce lead times while mitigating supply chain volatility. Traditional sourcing for basic apparel like plain t-shirts often results in:
– 4–8 weeks wasted on unverified supplier vetting
– 15–30% cost overruns from quality failures or MOQ renegotiations
– Reputational risk due to compliance gaps (e.g., labor, materials)
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these inefficiencies through a rigorously audited network of Tier-1 manufacturers specializing in plain t-shirts.
Time Savings Analysis: Traditional Sourcing vs. SourcifyChina Pro List
| Process Stage | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 18–25 business days | 0 days (pre-vetted) | 100% |
| Sample Approval | 10–14 business days | 3–5 business days | 65% |
| Compliance Verification | 7–12 business days | 0 days (certs on file) | 100% |
| MOQ/Negotiation | 8–11 business days | 2–4 business days | 70% |
| TOTAL (Per Sourcing Cycle) | 43–62 days | 5–14 days | 70–85% |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Client Benchmarking (n=127 procurement teams)
Your Competitive Advantage: The Pro List Guarantee
✅ Zero-Risk Onboarding: All suppliers factory-audited for ethical production, ISO 9001 compliance, and 5+ years of export experience.
✅ Real-Time Capacity Tracking: Access live production slots for 100–5,000+ unit orders (no minimum order traps).
✅ Predictable Pricing: Transparent FOB/CIF rates backed by 2026 fabric cost indices (cotton/polyester).
✅ Dedicated Sourcing Agent: Your single point of contact manages QC, logistics, and issue resolution.
“SourcifyChina cut our plain tee sourcing cycle from 52 to 9 days. We redirected $220K in operational costs to strategic innovation.”
— Head of Sourcing, EU Apparel Retailer (2025 Client)
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Allocation Now
Time is your most non-renewable resource. With global demand for basic apparel rising 12% YoY (McKinsey, 2026), verified production capacity is contracting. Delaying supplier qualification risks:
– ❌ Q1 2027 stockouts due to factory booking delays
– ❌ 20%+ cost premiums from last-minute sourcing
– ❌ Compliance penalties from unvetted partners
Act Before November 30, 2026:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “PRO LIST ACCESS – [Your Company]”
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for urgent capacity checks (24/7 response < 2 hours)
We’ll provide within 24 business hours:
– Full supplier dossier (audits, MOQs, live pricing)
– Custom sourcing roadmap for your volume/timeline
– No obligation – only actionable intelligence
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands
Data-Driven Sourcing. Zero Guesswork.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. | Unsubscribe via email request.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
