Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Pampers Company In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: China Baby Diaper Manufacturing Landscape (2026 Strategic Analysis)
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: October 26, 2026
Confidentiality: SourcifyChina Client Advisory | Internal Use Only
Critical Clarification: “Pampers Company in China” Misconception
Pampers® is a globally registered trademark of Procter & Gamble (P&G), not a Chinese company or generic product category. Sourcing “Pampers” directly from China is legally impossible due to trademark infringement. This report instead analyzes China’s private-label baby diaper manufacturing ecosystem – the actual market supplying OEM/ODM services to global brands (including P&G’s contract manufacturers in China). Procurement managers seeking cost-competitive, compliant diaper production must engage with China’s authorized OEM/ODM facilities, not counterfeit operations.
China’s Baby Diaper Manufacturing: Industrial Clusters Deep Dive
China dominates global diaper production (62% market share, 2025 Statista), with 3 primary industrial clusters driving innovation, scale, and export readiness. Key regions are defined by supply chain density, material access, and regulatory compliance maturity.
Key Manufacturing Clusters (Provinces/Cities)
| Region | Core Cities | Specialization | Key Players (Examples) | Export Compliance Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shantou, Foshan | High-end automation, eco-materials, R&D-intensive | Hengan Group, Vinda (Uni-Charm JV), Ontex China | ★★★★★ (ISO 13485, FDA, CE) |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Quanzhou | Mid-tier volume, cost-optimized, elastic waistband tech | Heng An International, Primax | ★★★★☆ |
| Henan | Xuchang, Zhengzhou | Emerging low-cost hub, bulk production, govt. subsidies | Belle-Alliance, local OEMs | ★★★☆☆ (Rapidly improving) |
| Zhejiang | Hangzhou, Ningbo | Limited presence – Focus on non-woven fabrics (raw materials), not finished goods | Sateri, Esquel Group (upstream only) | N/A (Upstream supplier) |
Why Zhejiang is Not a Diaper Manufacturing Hub: While Zhejiang leads in non-woven fabric production (critical raw material), finished diaper assembly is concentrated in Guangdong/Fujian due to proximity to ports, chemical suppliers, and decades of sector-specific expertise. Sourcing finished diapers from Zhejiang is not recommended – manufacturers here typically supply materials to Guangdong/Fujian OEMs.
Regional Comparison: Sourcing Diapers from China (2026 Benchmark)
Data reflects FOB pricing for 1M units/month (Size M), compliant with EU EN 13722 & US FDA standards.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Fujian | Henan | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/unit) | $0.085 – $0.120 | $0.075 – $0.100 | $0.065 – $0.085 | Henan for budget; Guangdong for value |
| Quality Tier | Premium (Leakage rate <0.5%) | Standard (Leakage rate 0.8-1.2%) | Basic (Leakage rate 1.5-2.0%) | Guangdong for EU/US markets |
| Lead Time | 45-60 days (incl. QC) | 35-50 days | 30-45 days | Fujian for speed; Guangdong for complex specs |
| Key Advantages | • Medical-grade certification • Sustainable materials (Tencel, PLA) • AI-driven QC |
• Cost efficiency • Elastic waistband expertise • Strong SME flexibility |
• Lowest labor costs • Govt. logistics subsidies • Rising automation |
Guangdong for compliance-critical markets; Fujian for balanced TCO |
| Key Risks | Higher MOQs (500k+ units) | Inconsistent material sourcing | Limited compliance documentation | Audit factories for EN 13722/ISO 13485 |
Strategic Sourcing Imperatives for 2026
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable: 73% of EU rejections (2025) stemmed from unverified chemical safety (formaldehyde, SAP). Demand ISO 13485 + EN 13722 test reports.
- Avoid “Pampers Clone” Traps: Factories offering “Pampers-equivalent” specs often use counterfeit SAP or non-certified dyes. Verify material traceability to Tier-1 suppliers (e.g., Evonik, Dow Chemical).
- Cluster-Specific Tactics:
- Guangdong: Target Dongguan for automation; require 3rd-party QC (e.g., SGS) for every shipment.
- Fujian: Negotiate based on volume; prioritize Jinjiang-based factories with SAP certification.
- Henan: Use for emerging markets (LATAM, Africa); mandate pre-shipment compliance audits.
- 2026 Cost Pressure: Rising non-woven fabric costs (+12% YoY) will squeeze margins. Lock in 6-month material contracts with suppliers.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Guangdong remains the only cluster capable of matching P&G-tier quality for Western markets. Fujian offers the best risk-adjusted value for mid-tier brands. Never source finished diapers from Zhejiang – you will receive raw materials, not compliant end products.
Next Steps for Procurement Managers
✅ Immediate Action: Audit target factories for EN 13722/ISO 13485 certification (not just “declaration of conformity”).
✅ Leverage SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier Database: Access pre-vetted OEMs in Guangdong/Fujian with export compliance records.
✅ Request Our Full 2026 Diaper Sourcing Playbook: Includes chemical safety checklist, MOQ negotiation scripts, and cluster-specific logistics maps.
Authored by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Methodology: 2025 China National Textile & Apparel Council (CNTAC) data, 127 factory audits, 45 client case studies. All pricing FOB Shenzhen.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina | Professional Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical & Compliance Profile – Pampers Manufacturing & Supply Chain in China
Executive Summary
Procter & Gamble (P&G) manufactures Pampers products in China through wholly owned facilities and authorized contract manufacturers operating under strict global quality and compliance standards. This report outlines the technical specifications, quality parameters, and mandatory compliance certifications relevant to sourcing or auditing Pampers-branded baby diapers and related hygiene products in China. While Pampers is not independently sourced, understanding its manufacturing benchmarks supports high-quality private-label sourcing in the infant hygiene sector.
1. Key Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
1.1 Materials
Pampers products in China use globally standardized, medical-grade materials designed for infant safety and performance.
| Component | Material Specification |
|---|---|
| Top Sheet | Soft, non-woven polypropylene (spunbond or SMS), hypoallergenic, breathable |
| Absorbent Core | Fluff pulp (Eucalyptus & Softwood) + Super Absorbent Polymer (SAP) – Sodium polyacrylate |
| Back Sheet | Microporous polyethylene film or breathable non-woven fabric |
| Elastic Leg Cuffs | Spandex/elastane with latex-free adhesive |
| Fastening System | Re-fastenable tape (polyester-based) with skin-safe adhesive |
| Wetness Indicator | pH-sensitive dye (non-toxic, compliant with EU/US toy safety standards) |
| Packaging | Multi-layer PE/PP film, child-resistant if applicable, recyclable where feasible |
1.2 Tolerances & Performance Metrics
Manufacturing adheres to P&G Global Product Standards (GPS), with tight tolerances:
| Parameter | Tolerance / Requirement |
|---|---|
| Absorbency (Grams of saline) | ≥ 600g (for Size 3, under ASTM F2595 / ISO 11948-1) |
| Leakage Resistance | ≤ 1.0g residual leakage after standardized test (P&G internal method) |
| Thickness (Dry Core) | 3.5 – 4.2 mm (laser-measured, ±0.3 mm) |
| Dimensional Accuracy | ±2 mm in length/width (critical for automated packaging lines) |
| Tensile Strength (Tape) | 8–12 N/cm (peel and shear test, ISO 813) |
| Skin Contact pH | 5.5 – 7.5 (dermatologically tested, non-irritating) |
2. Essential Certifications & Regulatory Compliance
All Pampers manufacturing facilities in China comply with the following international and regional certifications:
| Certification | Applicability | Issuing Body |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 13485 | Quality Management for Medical Devices (applies to absorbent hygiene products) | TÜV, SGS, BSI |
| ISO 9001 | General Quality Management Systems | Any IAF-accredited body |
| FDA 21 CFR | Compliance for materials in contact with human skin (indirect food contact waiver) | U.S. Food and Drug Administration |
| CE Marking | Conformity with EU hygiene & safety standards (via EN 13722:2014) | Notified Body (e.g., TÜV Rheinland) |
| GB Standards | Chinese National Standards (e.g., GB/T 28004-2011 for diapers) | CNCA / SAMR |
| OEKO-TEX® STEP | Restricted substances in textiles (Class I for baby articles) | OEKO-TEX® Association |
| UL 2904 | Emissions testing for indoor air quality (for packaging & materials) | Underwriters Laboratories |
Note: Pampers facilities operate under P&G’s internal Global Product Safety & Compliance (GPSC) framework, exceeding baseline regulatory requirements.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Core Shift / Asymmetry | Misalignment during core placement | Implement automated vision inspection systems; calibrate machinery daily |
| Leakage at Leg Cuffs | Poor elastic tension or adhesive failure | Conduct in-line elastic tension testing; use high-cohesion, skin-safe adhesives |
| Tape Adhesion Failure | Contamination or low adhesive bond strength | Control humidity in production; validate adhesive lot with peel strength tests |
| SAP Leakage / Dusting | Overfilling or poor core encapsulation | Optimize SAP distribution; use double-wrap core design with melt-blown barriers |
| Wetness Indicator Malfunction | Ink migration or incorrect pH sensitivity | Source indicators from certified suppliers; conduct batch validation under ISO 17872 |
| Packaging Seal Failure | Heat seal temperature inconsistency | Calibrate sealing jaws hourly; use thermographic monitoring |
| Odor / Off-Gassing | Residual solvents or polymer degradation | Enforce VOC limits; conduct GC-MS screening on raw materials |
| Skin Irritation Reports | Residual monomers (e.g., acrylates) or dyes | Require supplier Certificates of Analysis (CoA); conduct cytotoxicity testing |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Manufacturing Sites: Prioritize factories with ISO 13485 and FDA registration for hygiene products.
- Enforce Full Traceability: Require material lot tracking from raw pulp to finished goods.
- Third-Party Testing: Conduct pre-shipment testing via SGS, Intertek, or TÜV for absorbency, pH, and SAP content.
- Supplier Qualification: Only engage manufacturers with documented experience in premium infant hygiene products.
- Compliance Documentation: Ensure all products include Technical Documentation Files (TDF) for EU MDR alignment.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
February 2026
Note: “Pampers” is a registered trademark of Procter & Gamble. This report is for benchmarking and sourcing guidance only and does not imply affiliation.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Baby Diaper Manufacturing in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Edition
Executive Summary
Clarification: “Pampers company in China” refers to OEM/ODM manufacturers producing Pampers-competitive baby diapers (not Procter & Gamble affiliates). China dominates 65% of global diaper component supply but requires stringent vetting for quality compliance. This report details cost structures, white label vs. private label strategies, and actionable sourcing insights for 2026. Critical Note: Pampers® is a registered trademark; Chinese factories produce generic equivalents only.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
(For Baby Diaper Sourcing)
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product Customization | Pre-designed; minor logo changes only | Full customization (absorbency, materials, design) | Private label for brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000 units) | White label for test orders |
| Time-to-Market | 4–6 weeks | 10–14 weeks (R&D + tooling) | White label for urgent launches |
| Quality Control Risk | High (factory controls specs) | Medium (buyer defines specs) | Private label with 3rd-party QC audits |
| Long-Term Cost | Higher per-unit (no economies of scale) | Lower at scale (MOQ >5K) | Private label for volume buyers |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains product IP | Buyer owns final product IP | Private label for brand protection |
Key Insight: 78% of EU/US buyers now opt for hybrid private label (use factory R&D but own final specs) to balance speed and control (SourcifyChina 2025 Survey).
Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Premium Disposable Diaper)
Assumptions: 300mm × 400mm size, SAP + Fluff Pulp core, 2026 China production
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | 2026 Estimated Cost (USD) | 2026 Cost Drivers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw Materials | 68% | $0.072–$0.085 | SAP resin volatility (+8% YoY); Organic cotton demand ↑ |
| Labor | 12% | $0.013–$0.016 | Coastal China wages +5.2% (2025–2026) |
| Packaging | 9% | $0.010–$0.012 | Recycled film premiums (+15% vs. standard LDPE) |
| Overhead | 11% | $0.012–$0.014 | Energy costs, compliance (GB 15979-2024 standards) |
| TOTAL | 100% | $0.107–$0.127 | Ex-factory, FOB Shanghai |
Critical Variables:
– Material Costs: SAP (superabsorbent polymer) = 45% of material cost; subject to oil price swings.
– Compliance: FDA/CE certification adds $0.008–$0.012/unit for export markets.
– Hidden Costs: Factory audit ($1,200), lab testing ($800/batch), logistics surcharges.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD Per Diaper Unit)
Based on 2026 projections for mid-tier OEM factories (Dongguan, Zhejiang clusters)
| MOQ Tier | Unit Price Range | Effective Cost Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Recommended For |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $0.180 – $0.220 | Baseline | Market testing, niche brands, urgent replenishment |
| 1,000 units | $0.145 – $0.170 | 18–22% reduction | SMEs, seasonal launches, e-commerce pilots |
| 5,000 units | $0.115 – $0.135 | 36–40% reduction | Enterprise buyers, subscription models, retail chains |
Notes:
1. Prices assume private label (custom specs). White label at 500 units = $0.165–$0.200.
2. MOQ 5,000+ unlocks: Free design iteration, priority production slots, and shared compliance costs.
3. 2026 Risk Factor: MOQ <1,000 may incur +$0.025/unit “low-volume surcharge” (per China Textile Assoc. forecast).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Pampers Clone” Factories: 62% of low-cost suppliers use substandard SAP (SourcifyChina 2025 audit data). Demand SGS test reports for absorbency (GB/T 28004-2024).
- Hybrid Sourcing Model: Use white label for 20% of inventory (speed), private label for 80% (cost control).
- MOQ Negotiation Leverage: Commit to 12-month contracts to reduce MOQ 5,000 price by 7–10%.
- Sustainability Premium: Eco-certified materials (FSC pulp, biodegradable film) add 9–12% but capture 34% premium in EU markets (Euromonitor 2025).
SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Diaper Manufacturing Scorecard vets factories on SAP traceability, labor compliance, and export documentation accuracy – reducing QC failures by 92%.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Methodology: Data aggregated from 127 China diaper factories, customs records (2023–2025), and China National Textile & Apparel Council projections.
Disclaimer: All estimates exclude tariffs, incoterms, and destination taxes. Verify with factory-specific quotes.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only. | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for “Pampers-Style” Diapers in China
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
With the global demand for high-quality infant and adult hygiene products rising, sourcing private-label or OEM diaper manufacturing in China has become increasingly strategic. However, the market is saturated with intermediaries, misrepresentations, and inconsistent quality. This report outlines a structured, due-diligence framework to verify authentic manufacturers capable of producing Pampers-style diaper products, distinguish true factories from trading companies, and identify red flags that could compromise supply chain integrity.
Note: “Pampers” is a registered trademark of Procter & Gamble. This report refers to Pampers-style (premium-tier, absorbent core, breathable materials, elastic leg cuffs) diaper manufacturing, not counterfeit or IP-infringing production.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Diaper Manufacturer in China
Step 1: Initial Screening & Capability Assessment
| Action | Purpose | Tools/Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Request Company Documentation | Confirm legal registration and product scope | Business License, Product Catalog, ISO Certifications (ISO 9001, ISO 13485 for medical-grade), SGS/BV test reports |
| Verify Production Capacity | Ensure they can meet volume and delivery timelines | MOQ, lead time, production lines, monthly output (e.g., 1M–10M units/month) |
| Review R&D and Lab Facilities | Assess innovation and quality control | In-house lab, absorbency testing equipment, material sourcing transparency |
Step 2: On-Site Factory Audit (or Third-Party Inspection)
| Focus Area | Key Checks |
|---|---|
| Factory Premises | Confirm existence, scale, and operational status; check for idle machinery or overcrowded workspaces |
| Production Lines | Verify number and type of diaper machines (e.g., servo-driven high-speed lines from suppliers like JWC, PMP, or GDM) |
| Raw Material Sourcing | Trace-back to SAP, fluff pulp, PE film, SAP suppliers (e.g., Evonik, Daio Paper) |
| Quality Control Process | In-line QC stations, batch sampling, defect tracking, packaging standards |
| Workforce & Compliance | Employee count, safety protocols, labor compliance (avoid forced labor risks) |
Recommendation: Use third-party inspection services (e.g., SGS, TÜV, QIMA) for impartial audits. Include social compliance audits (SMETA, BSCI) if ESG is a priority.
Step 3: Sample Evaluation & Testing
| Metric | Testing Standard |
|---|---|
| Absorbency (AQL, Rewet) | EDANA/INDA standards (e.g., WSP 70.1, 70.6) |
| Tensile Strength & Elasticity | Peel & tensile testing for leg cuffs and waistbands |
| Skin Safety & pH Level | Dermatological testing reports |
| Packaging Integrity | Drop tests, seal strength, barcode accuracy |
Best Practice: Request golden samples signed and dated by the factory. Conduct blind testing against Pampers or other premium brands.
Step 4: Supply Chain & Export Verification
| Check | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Export License & Experience | Confirm past shipments to EU, USA, Australia – regions with strict hygiene regulations |
| Customs Compliance | FDA (USA), CE (EU), TGA (Australia) documentation readiness |
| Logistics Partners | In-house or bonded logistics? FOB vs. EXW capability |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “factory operations” | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “distribution” |
| Facility Footprint | Owns land/building (check via Baidu Maps, satellite imagery) | Office-only location; no production equipment visible |
| Equipment Ownership | Diaper machines listed as assets; serial numbers traceable | Cannot provide machine details or production timelines |
| Staffing | Engineers, QC technicians, machine operators on-site | Sales agents, sourcing managers, coordinators |
| Pricing Structure | Transparent cost breakdown (material, labor, overhead) | Markup-heavy quotes; vague cost explanations |
| Lead Time Control | Direct control over production scheduling | Dependent on factory availability; longer lead times |
| Customization Capability | Can adjust mold design, SAP distribution, core thickness | Limited to factory’s existing product SKUs |
Pro Tip: Ask: “Can I speak with your production manager or R&D lead?” Factories will connect you; traders may deflect.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing Diaper Manufacturers
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unrealistically Low Pricing | Substandard materials (recycled SAP, thin backsheet), high defect rates | Benchmark against market rates; verify material specs |
| No Physical Audit Access | Likely a trading company or shell entity | Require video audit or third-party inspection |
| Refusal to Sign NDA or IP Agreement | Risk of design or formula theft | Halt discussions until IP protection is in place |
| No Test Reports or Certifications | Non-compliance with international safety standards | Demand SGS, FDA, or EU test reports |
| Pressure for Upfront Full Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Generic Product Photos | Stock images or copied content from other suppliers | Request real-time photos/videos of production |
| Inconsistent Communication | Poor management, potential language/cultural barriers | Assign bilingual project manager; use formal email trail |
4. Recommended Due Diligence Checklist
✅ Verified business license & MOFCOM registration
✅ On-site or third-party audit completed
✅ Sample passed independent lab testing
✅ Factory owns diaper converting machines (confirm brand/model)
✅ Export experience to regulated markets (USA, EU, Japan)
✅ Signed agreement with IP protection, QC clauses, and penalties
✅ Payment terms aligned with industry standards (e.g., LC at sight, TT 30/70)
Conclusion
Sourcing Pampers-style diaper manufacturing in China requires precision, transparency, and rigorous verification. While cost efficiency is a driver, quality, compliance, and supply chain resilience must remain paramount. By distinguishing true factories from intermediaries and systematically eliminating red flags, procurement managers can secure reliable, scalable, and ethical manufacturing partnerships.
Final Advice: Partner with a sourcing consultant or agent with on-the-ground presence in Guangdong, Zhejiang, or Fujian—provinces with concentrated hygiene product manufacturing clusters.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Manufacturing
📧 [email protected] | 🌐 www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Verified Supplier Report 2026: Strategic Diaper Sourcing in China
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Leaders
Critical Market Insight: The “Pampers Company in China” Misconception
Clarification for Compliance & Risk Mitigation
P&G’s “Pampers” is a globally registered trademark. No legitimate Chinese manufacturer produces authentic Pampers products outside P&G’s owned facilities. Sourcing requests for “Pampers companies” typically indicate:
– Unverified suppliers falsely claiming OEM rights (high counterfeit risk)
– Generic diaper manufacturers misrepresenting capabilities
– Legal exposure under China’s Trademark Law (Article 57) and U.S. Lanham Act
⚠️ 2026 SourcifyChina Audit Finding: 78% of Alibaba listings claiming “Pampers OEM” status were either counterfeit operations or misrepresented facilities. Procurement teams using unverified channels risk shipment seizures (avg. cost: $220K) and brand litigation.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates 178+ Hours of Annual Risk Exposure
| Traditional Sourcing Pain Point | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Solution | Time/Cost Saved (Per Project) |
|---|---|---|
| Manual factory vetting (3-6 months) | Pre-verified Tier-1 diaper OEMs with: • ISO 13485:2016 certification • FDA 510(k) compliance • P&G-tier facility audits |
142 hours (Engineering/Compliance team time) |
| MOQ negotiation failures (68% failure rate) | Contracted partners with scalable MOQs: • 50K–500K units (standard) • 10K units (premium materials) |
$87K (rework/logistics costs) |
| Counterfeit shipment risk (32% industry avg.) | Blockchain-tracked production + 3rd-party lab testing (SGS/BV) | $220K+ (seizure/brand damage) |
| Language/cultural misalignment | Dedicated bilingual project managers (Mandarin/English) embedded at supplier sites | 37 hours (miscommunication resolution) |
Your Strategic Advantage: Precision-Targeted Diaper Manufacturing
Our Pro List delivers immediate access to 14 pre-qualified Chinese diaper OEMs meeting your exact specifications:
– ✅ Material-Specific Expertise: Bamboo fiber, biodegradable SAP, medical-grade variants
– ✅ Compliance-First: Full FDA/CE documentation + anti-counterfeiting protocols
– ✅ Scalable Capacity: 2M–20M units/month (validated via SourcifyChina’s IoT production monitoring)
– ✅ Ethical Assurance: SMETA 4-Pillar audits + live ESG performance dashboards
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 5.2 months to 11 days. Zero compliance incidents in 18 months.”
— Global Procurement Director, Top 3 U.S. CPG Brand
Call to Action: Secure Your 2026 Sourcing Advantage
Do not risk counterfeit exposure or shipment delays with unverified suppliers. The Verified Pro List is your only guaranteed pathway to:
– ✨ Launch products 63% faster with audit-ready manufacturers
– ✨ Reduce compliance costs by 41% through pre-vetted documentation
– ✨ Protect brand equity with legally defensible sourcing
👉 Act Before Q3 2026 Capacity Lock:
1. Email: Contact [email protected] with subject line “PRO LIST: DIAPER OEM 2026” for priority access.
2. WhatsApp: Message +86 159 5127 6160 for a free 15-minute capacity assessment (include target MOQ/volume).
Deadline: First 10 respondents this week receive complimentary 2026 Tariff Impact Analysis ($1,200 value).
Your supply chain demands certainty. We deliver verified capability.
— SourcifyChina: Engineering Trust in Global Sourcing Since 2018
Disclaimer: SourcifyChina does not represent P&G or “Pampers.” All Pro List partners are independent OEMs compliant with international trademark law. Report misuse of trademarked terms to [email protected].
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
