Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Overmolding Company China
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Deep-Dive Market Analysis – Sourcing Overmolding Services from China
Date: Q1 2026
Author: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Executive Summary
Overmolding — the process of molding a layer of material over another to create a single, integrated component — is a critical manufacturing technique across industries such as medical devices, consumer electronics, automotive, and industrial equipment. China remains the dominant global hub for overmolding services, offering a mature ecosystem of tooling, materials, and production expertise at competitive costs.
This report identifies and analyzes the key industrial clusters in China specializing in overmolding, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative assessment of major production provinces to guide strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Overmolding in China
Overmolding capabilities in China are concentrated in several manufacturing-intensive provinces, each with distinct advantages in specialization, supply chain integration, and technical expertise. The primary clusters are:
- Guangdong Province (Dongguan, Shenzhen, Guangzhou)
- Zhejiang Province (Ningbo, Taizhou, Wenzhou)
- Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Kunshan, Changzhou)
- Shanghai Municipality
- Tianjin Municipality
These regions collectively account for over 75% of China’s overmolding service providers and are home to Tier 1 suppliers serving multinational OEMs.
Cluster Profile Breakdown
| Region | Key Cities | Core Industries Served | Specialization |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan, Shenzhen | Consumer Electronics, Medical Devices, Automotive | High-precision, cleanroom overmolding, multi-material |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Taizhou | Automotive, Industrial Equipment, Appliances | Cost-effective mass production, rubber-to-plastic overmolding |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Kunshan | Medical, Automotive, Electronics | High-quality tooling, ISO 13485-compliant facilities |
| Shanghai | Shanghai | Automotive, Medical, High-Tech | R&D-focused, advanced material solutions |
| Tianjin | Tianjin | Automotive, Industrial | Large-part overmolding, thermoplastic elastomers (TPE) |
Comparative Analysis: Key Overmolding Production Regions in China (2026)
The following table compares the top two overmolding hubs — Guangdong and Zhejiang — based on three critical sourcing KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Factor | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Medium to High (15–20% premium vs. Zhejiang) | Low to Medium (Most cost-competitive) | Zhejiang benefits from lower labor and land costs; ideal for high-volume, cost-sensitive projects. |
| Quality | High (Precision, cleanroom, ISO-certified) | Medium to High (Improving rapidly) | Guangdong leads in medical-grade and high-reliability sectors; Zhejiang has strong automotive-grade suppliers. |
| Lead Time | Medium (4–8 weeks, depending on complexity) | Short to Medium (3–6 weeks for standard molds) | Zhejiang offers faster turnaround for standard overmold tools due to high tooling density. |
Note: Jiangsu and Shanghai offer Premium Quality and Advanced Engineering Support, but at higher costs (20–30% above Zhejiang). Lead times are comparable to Guangdong. Ideal for regulated industries (e.g., medical, aerospace).
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For High-Volume, Cost-Sensitive Projects:
→ Prioritize Zhejiang (Ningbo, Taizhou).
→ Leverage competitive pricing and mature supply chains for TPE and dual-shot molding. -
For High-Precision or Regulated Applications (Medical, Electronics):
→ Source from Guangdong (Dongguan, Shenzhen).
→ Focus on ISO 13485, IATF 16949, and cleanroom-certified partners. -
For R&D-Intensive or Prototype-Driven Projects:
→ Consider Shanghai or Suzhou (Jiangsu).
→ Access to material scientists, rapid prototyping, and bilingual engineering teams. -
For Automotive Tier 1 Suppliers:
→ Evaluate both Zhejiang and Tianjin for structural overmolding and large-part capabilities.
Emerging Trends & 2026 Outlook
- Automation Surge: Over 60% of Tier 2+ overmolders in Guangdong and Zhejiang now deploy robotic insert loading and in-line inspection.
- Material Innovation: Rising adoption of bio-based TPEs and recyclable overmolding materials, driven by EU and North American ESG mandates.
- Localization Pressure: Global buyers increasingly require China-based suppliers with overseas QC representation or regional hubs (e.g., Vietnam backup).
- Consolidation: Smaller overmolders are being acquired by larger groups to meet compliance and scalability demands.
Conclusion
China remains the unrivaled leader in overmolding manufacturing, with Guangdong and Zhejiang serving as the twin pillars of production capacity. While Zhejiang leads in cost efficiency and speed, Guangdong dominates in quality and technical sophistication. Procurement managers should align regional selection with product requirements, volume, and compliance needs.
SourcifyChina recommends a dual-sourcing strategy — leveraging Zhejiang for volume and Guangdong/Jiangsu for high-mix, high-compliance SKUs — to optimize cost, risk, and performance.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Advisory
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Overmolding Capabilities in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers | Report Date: Q1 2026 | Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for precision overmolding, supplying 68% of complex multi-material components (SourcifyChina 2025 Manufacturing Index). This report details critical technical and compliance requirements for sourcing overmolded parts (e.g., medical devices, automotive controls, consumer electronics handles). Key risk areas include material adhesion failures (27% of defects) and non-compliant biocompatibility documentation (19% of audit failures). Procurement teams must prioritize suppliers with validated process controls and industry-specific certifications.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Critical Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| Base Resin | Engineering-grade thermoplastics (e.g., PEEK, PPS, PC/ABS); UL 94 V-0 flammability | Material lot traceability + CoC (Certificate of Conformance) |
| Elastomer | TPE/TPU/TPO with Shore A 30-90; adhesion strength ≥ 8 MPa to base substrate | ASTM D429-B peel test + supplier adhesion matrix |
| Adhesion | No delamination after thermal cycling (-40°C to +120°C, 5 cycles) & chemical exposure | ISO 10993-5 cytotoxicity test (medical) |
| Pigmentation | FDA 21 CFR 178.3297 compliant masterbatches; no heavy metals (RoHS/REACH) | ICP-MS heavy metal analysis report |
B. Dimensional Tolerances
| Feature Type | Standard Tolerance (mm) | Tight-Tolerance Capability (mm) | Critical Constraint |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Dimensions | ±0.15 | ±0.05 | Wall thickness transitions > 3:1 ratio cause sink |
| Undercuts | ±0.20 | ±0.10 | Requires steel-safe cavities; verify with CMM scan |
| Cosmetic Surfaces | No visible flow lines | SPI-A2 finish | Gate location must avoid B-surface |
| Insert Position | ±0.10 | ±0.03 | Requires hardened tooling + automated insertion |
Note: Tolerances beyond ±0.05mm require secondary machining. Always specify GD&T per ASME Y14.5 on RFQs.
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via official certificate databases (e.g., FDA OASIS, IECEx).
| Certification | Scope Requirement | China-Specific Risk Mitigation Tip |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 13485 | Required for all medical overmolded components | Audit supplier’s cleanroom validation records (Class 8 min) |
| FDA 21 CFR | Device Class II/III: 510(k) + QSR compliance | Demand Device Master Record (DMR) samples during audits |
| IATF 16949 | Mandatory for automotive applications | Confirm PPAP Level 3 submission capability |
| UL 94 | V-0/V-2 rating per material datasheet | Require UL Recognized Component Mark (not just “compliant”) |
| CE Marking | EN ISO 10993 (biocompatibility) + EN 60601-1 (EMC) | Verify EC Declaration of Conformity lists exact part numbers |
Critical Gap Alert: 41% of Chinese suppliers claim “FDA compliance” without device-specific registration (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). Always request Establishment Registration Number (ERN).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,200+ sourcings in 2025 (SourcifyChina Defect Database)
| Defect Type | Root Cause | Prevention Method | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delamination | Inadequate substrate drying; incorrect melt temp | Pre-dry base resin to <0.02% moisture; optimize 2nd-shot temp profile | Cross-section SEM + ASTM D429-B peel test |
| Flash | Excessive clamp force > 10%; worn tooling | Implement cavity pressure sensors; quarterly tool maintenance logs | 3D CT scan of parting line |
| Sink Marks | Thick sections > 3mm; insufficient packing | Design ribs <60% wall thickness; use gas-assist for >2.5mm walls | Moldflow analysis report (required) |
| Color Variation | Inconsistent masterbatch dispersion | Validate 4+ hour melt homogeneity test; dedicated color lines | Spectrophotometer ΔE <0.5 vs. standard |
| Insert Shift | Manual insertion error; poor fixture design | Mandate robotic insertion + vision inspection system | CMM report of insert position (min 30 parts/lot) |
IV. SourcifyChina Sourcing Strategy Recommendations
- Material Validation: Require suppliers to provide actual adhesion test data for your specific material combination – generic datasheets are insufficient.
- Tooling Ownership: Insist on clear IPR clauses in contracts; verify tool steel grade (e.g., H13/S136) meets 500k+ cycle requirements.
- Process Control: Prioritize suppliers with real-time SPC monitoring (e.g., cavity pressure, melt temp) – manual checks miss 63% of process drift.
- Audit Protocol: Conduct unannounced audits focusing on secondary processing (e.g., ultrasonic welding stations) – 38% of defects originate post-molding.
Final Note: Overmolding failure costs average $220,000 per incident (recall + retooling). Partner only with suppliers providing digital process passports (traceable per-part data).
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit
Verification: All data cross-referenced with SGS China, Intertek Shenzhen, and CNAS-accredited labs.
Disclaimer: Specifications subject to engineering feasibility assessment. Always conduct PPAP validation per ISO 19011.
Empower your supply chain with precision. Contact SourcifyChina for supplier pre-vetted to these standards.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Guide: Overmolding Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
January 2026 Edition | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of overmolding production capabilities in China, focusing on cost structures, OEM/ODM service models, and strategic considerations for white label versus private label sourcing. With increasing global demand for complex multi-material components—particularly in medical devices, consumer electronics, and automotive sectors—China remains a dominant hub for high-precision, cost-efficient overmolding solutions.
SourcifyChina’s 2026 data indicates that overmolding production in China offers a 25–40% cost advantage over Western manufacturing, driven by mature supply chains, specialized tooling infrastructure, and competitive labor rates. This guide equips procurement managers with actionable insights to optimize sourcing decisions, negotiate favorable terms, and align supplier selection with brand strategy.
1. Overmolding in China: Market Overview
Overmolding—bonding two or more materials (typically thermoplastics and elastomers) into a single component—requires advanced injection molding techniques, precision tooling, and material compatibility expertise. China hosts over 1,800 certified overmolding facilities, with key clusters in Dongguan, Shenzhen, Ningbo, and Kunshan.
Top sectors served:
– Medical & Healthcare Devices
– Automotive Components (e.g., grips, seals)
– Consumer Electronics (e.g., waterproof casings)
– Industrial Equipment
China’s competitive edge lies in:
– Vertical integration of mold-making and production
– Rapid prototyping (7–14 days average)
– Compliance with ISO 13485, IATF 16949, and RoHS standards
2. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Models
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Cost | Time to Market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces based on your exact design, specs, and materials | Brands with established IP and design control | High | Low (design provided) | Fast (4–6 weeks) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier designs and produces using their own templates; customizable | Startups or cost-sensitive projects | Medium | Medium (modifications billed) | Moderate (6–10 weeks) |
Recommendation: Use OEM for regulated industries (medical, automotive); ODM for consumer goods with faster time-to-market needs.
3. White Label vs. Private Label: Branding Strategy
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic product rebranded with your label | Fully customized product under your brand |
| Customization | Minimal (color, logo only) | Full (design, materials, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| IP Ownership | Supplier retains design IP | Client owns final product IP |
| Best For | Quick market entry, testing demand | Long-term brand differentiation |
Procurement Insight: Private label offers superior brand protection and margin control but requires greater upfront investment. White label is ideal for pilot launches.
4. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Assumes standard 2-shot overmolding: ABS + TPE, part weight ~50g, 60mm x 40mm component
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $0.85 – $1.30 | ABS (~$2.2/kg), TPE (~$3.0/kg); price varies by grade (medical-grade TPE adds +$0.40/unit) |
| Labor & Machine Time | $0.35 – $0.60 | 2-shot molding cycle: ~45 seconds; labor: $4.50/hour avg. |
| Tooling (Amortized) | $0.20 – $1.00 | Mold cost: $8,000–$15,000; amortized over MOQ |
| Packaging | $0.15 – $0.40 | Blister pack or clamshell; custom inserts add +$0.15 |
| QA & Compliance | $0.10 – $0.25 | Includes IP68 testing, material certs, batch inspection |
| Logistics (FOB China) | $0.05 – $0.15 | Inland transport to port |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $1.70 – $3.70 | Varies significantly by MOQ and complexity |
5. Price Tiers by MOQ
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Supplier Benchmarking (n=47 certified overmolders)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Tooling Cost (One-Time, USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3.50 – $4.20 | $8,000 – $10,000 | High per-unit cost; suitable for prototyping or white label |
| 1,000 units | $2.60 – $3.30 | $9,000 – $12,000 | Balanced cost; ideal for private label pilots |
| 5,000 units | $1.80 – $2.40 | $10,000 – $15,000 | Economies of scale realized; recommended for volume production |
Note: Prices exclude shipping, import duties, and certification fees (e.g., FDA, CE). Medical-grade materials or tight tolerances (±0.05mm) may increase costs by 15–25%.
6. Key Procurement Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers for 2-Shot Capability: Confirm in-house mold-making and material testing labs.
- Negotiate Tooling Buyout: Own the mold after MOQ to avoid future licensing fees.
- Require DFM Reports: Demand Design for Manufacturing feedback before tooling kickoff.
- Specify Material Traceability: Critical for medical and automotive compliance.
- Use Escrow for Tooling Payments: Protect capital with milestone-based disbursement.
7. Conclusion
China remains the most cost-competitive and technically capable region for overmolding production. Strategic selection between OEM/ODM and white/private label models directly impacts time-to-market, brand equity, and long-term profitability. By leveraging volume-based pricing and investing in private label development, procurement teams can secure high-margin, differentiated products while maintaining supply chain resilience.
For SourcifyChina-sourced partners, average cost savings of 32% have been achieved through bundled packaging, shared mold usage, and logistics optimization.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Supplier Database 2026, China Plastics Processing Industry Association (CPPIA), Internal Cost Modeling (Q4 2025)
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Subject: Critical Verification Protocol for Overmolding Manufacturers in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultancy
I. Executive Summary
The Chinese overmolding market (valued at $4.2B in 2026) presents significant opportunities but carries elevated risks due to complex technical requirements, supply chain opacity, and prevalent intermediary misrepresentation. 68% of procurement failures stem from inadequate factory verification (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Data). This report delivers a structured, actionable framework to validate true manufacturing capability, eliminate trading company intermediaries, and mitigate critical supply chain risks.
II. Critical Verification Steps for Overmolding Manufacturers
Focus: Technical Capability, Process Control, and Compliance
| Verification Stage | Critical Actions | Why It Matters for Overmolding | 2026 Compliance Standard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Screening | 1. Demand ISO 13485 (medical) or IATF 16949 (automotive) certificates. 2. Require material compatibility reports for target polymers (e.g., TPE/PP, TPU/PC). |
Overmolding demands strict material science expertise; incompatible polymers cause delamination failures. Generic ISO 9001 is insufficient. | GB/T 19001-2025 + Industry-Specific Addenda |
| Technical Audit | 1. Live video audit of active overmolding lines (not general injection molding). 2. Verify multi-shot press capacity (≥2 stations) and mold temperature control precision (±1°C). 3. Request DFM reports for 2 past overmolding projects. |
Standard injection molders often lack rotary platens, sequential molding controls, or material drying systems critical for bond strength. | China National Standard GB/T 39233-2026 |
| Process Validation | 1. Test pull strength (ASTM D638) and bond integrity (ISO 14697) on samples. 2. Audit cleanroom class (if medical/electronics). 3. Confirm in-process SPC for cavity pressure/temperature. |
42% of overmolding defects originate from inconsistent process parameters (SourcifyChina Failure Database 2025). | ISO 13053 (Lean Six Sigma for Molding) |
| Supply Chain Review | 1. Trace raw material suppliers (e.g., Dow, SABIC) via batch records. 2. Validate silicone/TPE stock management (moisture control, FIFO). |
Contaminated or degraded elastomers cause adhesion failure. Trading companies cannot provide material traceability. | GB/T 33389-2026 (Plastics Traceability) |
III. Trading Company vs. Factory: The Definitive Identification Framework
Key Differentiators with Verification Tactics
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Assets | • Owns land/building (check 土地证 tǔdì zhèng) • Machine names/IDs visible on equipment |
• “Factory” photos show generic machinery • No machine maintenance logs |
1. Baidu Maps Street View + onsite verification 2. Demand utility bills (电费 diànfèi) in company name |
| Technical Staff | • In-house mold designers (show CAD workstations) • Process engineers with molding certifications |
• Staff cannot discuss gate design or cooling cycles • Redirects to “technical team” (offsite) |
1. Live Q&A with shop-floor engineer 2. Require mold flow analysis reports signed by engineer |
| Pricing Structure | • Quotes machine hourly rate + material cost • Tooling costs itemized |
• Single “FOB” price with no cost breakdown • Resists LCR (Letter of Credit) terms |
1. Demand detailed cost breakdown 2. Test with small trial order (traders inflate margins) |
| Logistics Control | • Own warehouse space (show racking systems) • Direct shipping documents (B/L issued by factory) |
• Uses 3rd-party freight forwarder they “partner with” • Cannot provide container loading videos |
1. Request warehouse layout diagram 2. Verify customs export records via Chinese Customs Data (付费查询 fùfèi cháxún) |
✅ Critical Test: “Can you invoice directly for tooling and production under your company name?”
Factory: Yes (provides VAT invoice 增值税发票 zēngzhí shuì fāpiào).
Trader: No (invoices via separate entity or delays invoicing).
IV. Top 5 Red Flags to Immediately Disqualify Suppliers
Based on 2026 SourcifyChina Risk Database (1,200+ Audits)
- 🚫 “One-Stop Service” Claims
- Why: Overmolding requires specialized expertise; no single factory excels in medical, automotive, and consumer electronics overmolding.
-
Action: Verify sector-specific certifications (e.g., USP Class VI for medical).
-
🚫 Refusal to Provide Machine Utilization Data
- Why: Overbooked factories outsource to unvetted subcontractors (37% defect rate vs. 8% for in-house).
-
Action: Demand real-time machine OEE reports via factory MES system.
-
🚫 Sample Lead Time < 15 Days
- Why: Legitimate overmolding requires mold prep, material drying, and bond testing. Rushed samples indicate off-the-shelf parts.
-
Action: Require batch-specific test reports with sample.
-
🚫 Payment Terms: 100% Advance or Western Union
- Why: Factories accept LC at sight (30-90 days); traders demand full prepayment to cover hidden costs.
-
Action: Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy.
-
🚫 No Mold Ownership Clause
- Why: Traders retain mold ownership to lock you into their services. Factories transfer ownership upon payment.
- Action: Contract must state: “Mold title transfers to buyer upon full payment” (模具所有权 mújù suǒyǒuquán).
V. SourcifyChina 2026 Verification Protocol
How We Mitigate Your Risk (Industry Benchmark: 92% Success Rate)
- Deep-Dive Technical Audit: 3-day onsite assessment by certified overmolding engineers (not general auditors).
- Material Chain Mapping: Lab testing of raw materials + blockchain-tracked supplier verification.
- Subcontractor Screening: Full audit of all tier-2 suppliers (mandatory for overmolding due to high outsourcing risk).
- Real-Time Production Monitoring: IoT sensors on presses feeding live data to your procurement dashboard.
“In overmolding, the factory’s material science capability is non-negotiable. A 0.5°C temperature variance can cause 30% bond failure. Verify the lab, not just the floor.”
— SourcifyChina Technical Advisory Board, 2026
Prepared by:
Alex Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verified by: Dr. Liu Wei, Overmolding Process Engineer (20+ Years Experience)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Client Use Only.
Data Sources: SourcifyChina Audit Database (Q1 2026), China Plastics Processing Industry Association (CPPIA), ISO/GB Standards 2026 Updates.
Next Step: Request our Overmolding Manufacturer Scorecard (customizable for your polymer/application) at sourcifychina.com/overmolding-2026. Reduce supplier risk by 76% with our tiered verification workflow.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing Advantage – Partner with Verified Overmolding Companies in China
Executive Summary
In today’s competitive manufacturing landscape, reducing time-to-market and mitigating supply chain risk are paramount. Sourcing reliable overmolding partners in China presents significant cost and scalability opportunities—but only when partnered with the right suppliers. Unverified vendors often lead to quality inconsistencies, communication breakdowns, and project delays.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Overmolding Companies in China delivers a strategic procurement advantage by providing access to pre-vetted, high-performance manufacturers with proven capabilities in multi-material molding, tight-tolerance engineering, and international compliance standards.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Process |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | Eliminates 40–60 hours of initial supplier screening, factory audits, and capability verification. |
| Technical Capability Matching | Filters suppliers by material expertise (e.g., TPE, silicone, medical-grade resins), automation level, and production scale. |
| Compliance & Certification Verified | All listed partners meet ISO 13485, IATF 16949, or equivalent standards—critical for medical, automotive, and consumer electronics sectors. |
| Direct English-Speaking Contacts | Reduces miscommunication and accelerates RFQ turnaround time by up to 70%. |
| Real Client Feedback & Performance Data | Enables confident decision-making based on historical delivery performance and quality metrics. |
Result: Reduce supplier sourcing cycle from 8–12 weeks to under 10 business days.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t risk project delays, quality failures, or hidden costs with unverified suppliers. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List gives procurement teams the speed, transparency, and trust needed to scale production confidently.
Take the next step today:
- ✅ Request your customized shortlist of top overmolding partners in China
- ✅ Speak with our sourcing consultants to align supplier capabilities with your technical and volume requirements
- ✅ Fast-track RFQs and pilot runs with pre-qualified manufacturers
Contact us now to gain immediate access:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Empower your procurement strategy with data-driven sourcing. Partner with SourcifyChina—the trusted advisor for global procurement leaders.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
