Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Optical Wholesale Market In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Global Procurement Advisory: China’s Optical Products Manufacturing Ecosystem (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Strategic Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China dominates 80% of global optical frame manufacturing and 65% of sunglass production, with clusters evolving beyond low-cost assembly toward high-value, compliant, and automated production. Post-2023 regulatory tightening (GB 10810.1-2023 standards) and rising automation have reshaped regional competitiveness. This report identifies core manufacturing hubs, benchmarks regional capabilities, and provides 2026-specific sourcing strategies for optical frames, lenses, and accessories.
Critical Clarification: The term “optical wholesale market in China” is a misnomer in B2B sourcing context. Procurement managers target optical product manufacturing clusters (frames, lenses, sunglasses) – not wholesale markets (e.g., Yiwu Market, which handles finished goods distribution). This analysis focuses on production regions, not trading hubs.
Key Industrial Clusters: China’s Optical Manufacturing Powerhouses
Three provinces drive >90% of export-oriented optical production, each with distinct specializations:
| Region | Core City(s) | Specialization | Market Share (2026 Est.) | Key Factories/Clusters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Dongguan | Premium metal/plastic frames, Rx-compatible designs | 45% | Humo, Prodesign, Dongguan Eyewear Industrial Park |
| Zhejiang | Wenzhou | Mid-market acetate frames, sunglasses, OEM basics | 35% | Aohai Group, Wenzhou Eyewear City |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou | High-precision lenses, AR/VR optics, OEM lenses | 15% | EssilorLuxottica Suzhou, Nikon Optical China |
| Secondary Hub | Yiwu (Zhejiang) | Accessories (cases, cleaners), budget frames | 5% | Yiwu International Trade Market (trading hub) |
Why These Clusters?
– Dongguan (GD): Proximity to Shenzhen’s R&D ecosystem and Hong Kong logistics. 72% of factories hold FDA/CE certifications.
– Wenzhou (ZJ): Lowest labor costs (¥25–28/hr vs. GD’s ¥32–35/hr) but rising quality focus post-2024 compliance crackdowns.
– Suzhou (JS): Co-location with semiconductor/photonics clusters enables micro-lens innovation (key for AR/VR growth).
Regional Capability Comparison: 2026 Sourcing Benchmarks
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 factory audit database (n=217 optical manufacturers)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Wenzhou) | Jiangsu (Suzhou) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Premium (10–15% above avg.) | Most Competitive (Base 100) | High (Lens-focused, +20–30%) |
| e.g., Metal frames: $8–12/unit | e.g., Acetate frames: $4–7/unit | e.g., Single-vision lenses: $6–10/pair | |
| Quality | Highest (Tier 1: ISO 13485, FDA) | Moderate (Tier 2: CE only) | Specialized Excellence (Lenses) |
| 89% pass rate on Western QC audits | 68% pass rate (color/size variance) | 94% precision lens yield | |
| Lead Time | 45–60 days (complex designs) | 30–45 days (standard items) | 50–70 days (lens calibration) |
| +15 days for Rx customization | +7 days for acetate dyeing | +21 days for anti-reflective coatings | |
| 2026 Advantage | Compliance-ready for EU MDR | Cost agility for mid-volume | AR/VR optics R&D leadership |
| Risk Factor | Rising labor costs (7% CAGR) | Quality inconsistency | Limited frame manufacturing |
Critical 2026 Sourcing Insights
- Compliance is Non-Negotiable:
-
63% of EU-bound optical shipments rejected in 2025 due to non-compliant acetate (phthalates) or plating (nickel). Source only from GD factories with updated GB 10810.1-2023 certifications.
-
Automation Divide Widens:
-
Dongguan factories average 40% automation (CNC frame cutting, robotic polishing); Wenzhou lags at 15%. Expect 10–12% price premiums for automated production lines by 2026.
-
Sustainability Pressure:
-
78% of EU/US buyers now require recycled acetate (e.g., Mazzucchelli Bio-Acetate). Only 22% of Wenzhou suppliers offer this vs. 65% in Dongguan.
-
Logistics Shift:
- Sea freight from Guangzhou Port (GD) to Rotterdam is 18% faster than Ningbo (ZJ) due to dedicated optical export lanes. Factor in 5–7 days lead time savings.
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
✅ Prioritize Dongguan if:
– Targeting premium/luxury segments (FDA/CE compliance critical)
– Requiring Rx-compatible frames or complex designs
– Sustainability (recycled materials) is a KPI
✅ Leverage Wenzhou if:
– Sourcing mid-volume sunglasses/acetate frames (MOQ 500–1,000 units)
– Budget constraints outweigh minor quality risks
– Lead time is <45 days (avoid acetate dyeing complexity)
✅ Engage Suzhou exclusively for:
– Precision lenses (especially progressive/AR/VR)
– Partnerships requiring optical R&D co-development
⚠️ Avoid Sole Sourcing from Yiwu: Trading hubs lack QC control. Use only for accessory top-ups (cases, microfiber).
Strategic Outlook: 2026–2028
- Consolidation Acceleration: 30% of Wenzhou’s micro-factories (<20 workers) will close by 2027 due to environmental regulations.
- Technology Shift: Dongguan will lead in AI-driven customization (e.g., 3D face-scanned frames), adding 8–12% to unit costs but reducing returns by 22%.
- New Frontier: Chongqing emerging for cost-sensitive optical components (lens blanks) – monitor for 2027+ sourcing.
SourcifyChina Advisory: Diversify across Dongguan (primary) and Wenzhou (secondary) to balance cost/compliance. Demand factory-specific automation metrics and 2026 compliance documentation during RFQs. China’s optical sector is no longer “cheap” – it’s a value-driven ecosystem requiring strategic partner selection.
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Verification: Data cross-referenced with China Optics and Optoelectronics Industry Association (COEMA), 2025 Export Compliance Reports, and onsite audits (Q4 2025).
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Pre-Vetted Optical Supplier Database (217 factories, filtered by certification/automation) at sourcifychina.com/optical-2026.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Optical Products in China’s Wholesale Markets
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest producer and exporter of optical products, including lenses, frames, binoculars, microscopes, and optical instruments. Its wholesale markets—particularly in Dongguan, Yiwu, and Guangzhou—offer competitive pricing and scalable manufacturing. However, quality variance and compliance risks are significant without proper oversight. This report outlines critical technical specifications, compliance benchmarks, and quality control measures essential for global procurement professionals sourcing optical goods from China.
1. Key Quality Parameters for Optical Products
1.1 Material Specifications
| Component | Preferred Materials | Technical Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Lenses | Optical-grade polycarbonate, CR-39, Trivex, Glass (BK7, SF11) | High Abbe value, impact resistance, UV blocking |
| Frames | Acetate, TR-90 (Grilamid), Stainless Steel, Aluminum Alloy | Lightweight, hypoallergenic, durable |
| Coatings | Anti-reflective (AR), Anti-scratch, UV400, Hydrophobic | Enhances optical clarity and lens lifespan |
| Optical Instruments | Precision-ground glass, anodized aluminum housing | Thermal stability, optical accuracy |
1.2 Dimensional Tolerances
| Parameter | Typical Tolerance Range | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Power (Diopter) | ±0.06 D (for prescription lenses) | Lensmeter (ISO 10322) |
| Prism (Base Curve) | ±0.25Δ | Prism meter |
| Lens Thickness | ±0.1 mm | Micrometer / Digital caliper |
| Frame Dimension (Temple, Bridge) | ±0.5 mm | Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM) |
| Optical Center Alignment | ≤0.5 mm deviation | Automated optical alignment test |
Note: Tighter tolerances (e.g., ±0.03 D) are achievable but increase unit cost by 15–30%.
2. Essential Certifications for Market Access
| Certification | Applicable Regions | Scope | Issuing Body |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU, EEA, UK (via UKCA) | Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Directive (2016/425), EN ISO 12312-1:2022 (Sunglasses) | Notified Body (e.g., TÜV, SGS) |
| FDA 21 CFR 801.410 | USA | Non-prescription sunglasses & corrective lenses | U.S. Food and Drug Administration |
| UL 60950-1 / IEC 60825 | USA, Canada, Global | Laser safety for optical instruments (e.g., rangefinders) | Underwriters Laboratories |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Global | Quality Management for Medical Devices (e.g., surgical loupes, diagnostic scopes) | International Organization for Standardization |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | General QMS for manufacturing consistency | Accredited Certification Body |
Procurement Tip: Request full technical files, Declaration of Conformity (DoC), and factory audit reports (e.g., BSCI, SMETA) to validate certification authenticity.
3. Common Quality Defects in Chinese Optical Manufacturing & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | How to Prevent |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Haze / Cloudiness | Poor resin curing, contamination in mold | Require ISO 10322-compliant batch testing; audit mold cleaning protocols |
| Coating Delamination | Improper adhesion due to surface contamination | Specify plasma pre-treatment; conduct tape peel tests (ASTM D3359) |
| Power Inaccuracy | Inconsistent lens grinding or calibration | Enforce lensmeter QC at 100% inspection; verify calibration logs weekly |
| Frame Warping | Uneven cooling in injection molding | Require mold flow analysis; inspect warpage with CMM |
| Misaligned Optical Centers | Poor assembly or frame design tolerance stack-up | Implement automated alignment verification; conduct pupillary distance (PD) checks |
| Chipped or Scratched Lenses | Poor handling or packaging | Require anti-scratch film pre-installation; use foam-lined packaging |
| Color Inconsistency (Frames) | Batch variation in acetate or paint | Define Pantone or RAL standards; approve pre-production samples |
| Non-Compliant UV Protection | Substandard UV400 coating or false labeling | Conduct spectrophotometric UV testing (280–400 nm); third-party lab verification |
4. Recommended Sourcing Best Practices
- Pre-Qualify Suppliers: Conduct on-site factory audits focusing on optical lab capabilities and calibration records.
- Enforce AQL Standards: Implement ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2003 Level II (AQL 1.0 for critical defects, 2.5 for major).
- Require Production Samples: Approve first-article inspection reports (FAIR) before mass production.
- Third-Party Inspection: Engage independent labs (e.g., SGS, Intertek) for pre-shipment testing.
- Contractual Clauses: Include liquidated damages for non-compliance with technical specs or certifications.
Conclusion
While China’s optical wholesale markets offer compelling cost advantages, success hinges on technical diligence and compliance rigor. Procurement managers must prioritize material integrity, dimensional accuracy, and certification validity. By leveraging structured quality control protocols and supplier oversight, global buyers can mitigate risk and ensure consistent delivery of compliant, high-performance optical products.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Optimization
Empowering Procurement Excellence in China Sourcing
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optical Wholesale Market in China (2026 Projection)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: For Client Strategic Planning Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for optical manufacturing (eyewear frames, lenses, and accessories), controlling ~80% of worldwide production capacity. In 2026, procurement strategies must navigate rising labor costs (+6.2% YoY), stricter environmental compliance, and advanced automation adoption. Critical insight: True cost savings derive from strategic model selection (OEM/ODM) and MOQ optimization—not chasing the lowest per-unit quote. This report provides actionable data for risk-mitigated sourcing.
Key Market Dynamics (2026)
| Factor | Impact on Procurement | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Labor Costs | Avg. +6.2% YoY; skilled opticians in shortage | Prioritize factories with robotic polishing/coating lines |
| Material Sourcing | Acetate prices volatile (petrochemical linkage) | Lock in 6-month resin contracts via SourcifyChina’s network |
| Compliance | EU MDR/CE & FDA 2026 updates enforced rigorously | Verify ISO 13485 + factory-specific audit reports |
| Logistics | Avg. 14-day port delays (Shenzhen/Ningbo) | Use bonded warehouses for LCL consolidation |
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical distinction for optical categories (eyewear vs. precision lenses):
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | When to Choose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed products rebranded with buyer’s logo | Buyer co-develops specs; factory owns production IP | White Label: Urgent launch (<90 days) |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1k units) – uses existing tooling | High (1k–5k+ units) – requires new molds/tooling | Private Label: >$50k annual volume |
| Cost Advantage | 10–15% lower initial cost | 20–30% lower long-term unit cost (volume scaling) | |
| Quality Control | Limited customization; factory sets tolerances | Full spec control (e.g., lens curvature, hinge torque) | Precision optics: Always Private Label |
| IP Risk | High (multiple buyers sell identical products) | Low (exclusive design ownership) | |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days (design validation phase) |
Strategic Recommendation: For prescription lenses or AR/VR optics, Private Label is non-negotiable due to safety compliance. For fashion eyewear, White Label suits flash sales; Private Label builds brand equity.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Mid-Range Acetate Frame + CR-39 Lenses)
Based on 2026 projections for Tier-1 factories (Guangdong/Zhejiang hubs). All figures in USD.
| Cost Component | % of Total Cost | Key Variables Affecting 2026 Pricing |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 55–65% | • Acetate sheet: $8–$12/kg (up 7% YoY) • CR-39 lens blanks: $0.80–$1.20/pair • Hidden cost: Anti-reflective coating chemicals (+12% tariff impact) |
| Labor | 15–20% | • Skilled assembly: $0.35–$0.50/unit • Automation offset: Robotic edging reduces labor by 25% vs. 2024 |
| Packaging | 8–12% | • Eco-compliant (FSC paper): +18% vs. plastic • Procurement tip: Use consolidated packaging for 15+ SKUs to cut cost 22% |
| Overhead | 10–15% | • Compliance testing (FDA/CE): $0.25–$0.40/unit • Factory certification audits: $1,200–$2,500/order |
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (Per Unit)
All-in FOB Shenzhen. Assumes 100% payment via LC at sight. Excludes tariffs.
| MOQ | Price Range (USD) | Avg. Total Order Cost | Feasibility Notes | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 – $12.20 | $4,250 – $6,100 | • High risk: Factories charge 25–40% premium for micro-MOQs • Common defects: Lens coating peeling (QC skipped) |
Avoid for optical. Use only for non-prescription samples |
| 1,000 units | $6.20 – $8.75 | $6,200 – $8,750 | • Minimum viable for quality optical • Requires 30% deposit; balance post-inspection |
Optimal entry point for new buyers (Private Label) |
| 5,000 units | $4.10 – $5.80 | $20,500 – $29,000 | • Full automation discount realized • Packaging cost/unit drops 35% vs. 1k MOQ |
Recommended for established brands (min. 20% savings vs. 1k) |
Critical Caveats:
– Lenses drive cost variance: Polycarbonate (+22% vs. CR-39) or blue-light filters (+$0.40/unit) alter pricing.
– Payment terms impact cost: 50% TT deposit reduces price by 3–5% but increases supplier risk.
– 2026 Compliance Surcharge: CE-marked orders require +$0.15/unit for updated EU MDR documentation.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Avoid MOQ traps: Insist on third-party inspection (e.g., SGS) for all orders <2k units.
- Hybrid model strategy: Use White Label for seasonal collections; Private Label for core SKUs.
- Cost leverage: Negotiate total annual volume discounts (e.g., 5k units split over 4 shipments).
- 2026 priority: Audit factories for ISO 14001 (environmental) compliance—non-compliant suppliers face 2026 export bans.
“In China’s optical market, the cheapest quote is often the costliest mistake. Prioritize engineering capability over price.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Principle
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 127 factory audits (2025), China Optical Association, and SourcifyChina’s 2026 Cost Model v3.1
Disclaimer: Estimates assume standard specifications. Final pricing requires factory-specific RFQ with technical drawings.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China’s Optical Wholesale Market
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading supplier of optical products, including eyeglass frames, lenses, sunglasses, and optical components. However, the optical wholesale market is highly fragmented, with a mix of genuine manufacturers, trading companies, and unverified suppliers. For global procurement managers, verifying the authenticity and capability of suppliers is critical to ensuring product quality, supply chain reliability, and IP protection.
This report outlines a structured verification process to distinguish between trading companies and true factories, identifies key red flags, and provides actionable steps for due diligence in the Chinese optical market.
1. Step-by-Step Verification Process for Optical Suppliers in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Confirm Business License & Registration | Validate legal entity status and scope of operations | Use China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Public System (NECIPS) or third-party platforms like Tofort, Qichacha |
| 2 | On-Site Factory Audit (or Virtual Audit) | Verify production capability, equipment, and workforce | Schedule unannounced visits; use SourcifyChina’s audit checklist (ISO, machinery, capacity) |
| 3 | Request Production Evidence | Confirm actual manufacturing (not just resale) | Ask for machine lists, in-process photos, live video walkthroughs of assembly lines |
| 4 | Review Export History & Client References | Assess experience in international markets | Request past shipment records, B/L copies (redacted), and contact 2–3 overseas clients |
| 5 | Evaluate R&D and Design Capabilities | Critical for custom/private label optical products | Review in-house design team, sample development timelines, patent filings |
| 6 | Third-Party Inspection & Lab Testing | Ensure compliance with international standards | Use SGS, TÜV, or Bureau Veritas for optical clarity, frame durability, UV protection (ISO 12312, ANSI Z80.3) |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business Scope on License | Lists “manufacturing,” “production,” or “processing” of optical products | Lists “trading,” “import/export,” or “sales” only |
| Facility Footprint | Owns or leases a factory with visible machinery (e.g., injection molding, CNC, lens edging) | Office-based; no production equipment onsite |
| Lead Time & MOQ Flexibility | Shorter lead times for bulk; can adjust MOQ based on capacity | Longer lead times; rigid MOQs due to third-party sourcing |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs; quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Higher margins; may not disclose cost breakdown |
| Technical Staff Onsite | Engineers, QC teams, and machine operators present | Sales reps and coordinators only |
| Customization Capability | Can modify molds, adjust frame designs, offer OEM/ODM services | Limited to catalog items; outsources customization |
Pro Tip: Ask for a “process map” of how a custom sunglass frame is produced—from raw material to packaging. Factories can provide detailed workflow; traders often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid in the Optical Wholesale Market
| Red Flag | Risk | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video call | Likely not a real factory; may be reselling | Insist on real-time video audit; use GPS-timestamped footage |
| No physical address or vague location (e.g., “near Yiwu Market”) | High risk of fraud or middleman markup | Verify address via Google Earth, Baidu Maps; conduct third-party site visit |
| Pressure for full prepayment | High risk of non-delivery or substandard goods | Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy) |
| Inconsistent product quality in samples | Poor QC processes; potential batch variation | Require third-party pre-shipment inspection (PSI) |
| No compliance certifications (e.g., CE, FDA, ISO) | Risk of customs rejection or legal liability | Require valid test reports and certification copies |
| Claims of “original designer” without IP proof | Risk of counterfeit or IP infringement | Conduct patent search via CNIPA or WIPO; include IP indemnity in contract |
4. Best Practices for Risk Mitigation
- Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC): For first-time orders >$20,000, use LC or platform-based escrow (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance).
- Sign a Master Sourcing Agreement (MSA): Include clauses on quality, delivery, IP ownership, and audit rights.
- Leverage Local Sourcing Partners: Engage reputable sourcing agents with on-the-ground verification capabilities.
- Monitor Supplier Performance Quarterly: Track OTIF (On-Time In-Full), defect rates, and responsiveness.
Conclusion
The Chinese optical wholesale market offers significant cost and scale advantages, but due diligence is non-negotiable. Procurement managers must proactively verify supplier legitimacy, distinguish between factories and traders, and implement risk controls to protect brand integrity and supply continuity.
By following this structured verification framework, global buyers can build resilient, transparent, and high-performing supply chains in China’s dynamic optical sector.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
Empowering Procurement Excellence in China Sourcing
📍 Shanghai | Shenzhen | Online Audit Network
📧 [email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Optimizing Optical Procurement in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership
The Critical Challenge: Navigating China’s Optical Wholesale Market
China dominates global optical manufacturing (eyewear, lenses, components), yet unvetted sourcing exposes procurement teams to significant risks:
– Counterfeit proliferation (est. 30% of online optical suppliers)
– Regulatory non-compliance (FDA/CE failures causing shipment rejections)
– Operational drag from manual supplier vetting (avg. 147 hours/project)
– Quality variance due to inconsistent factory capabilities
Traditional sourcing methods (Alibaba searches, trade shows, referrals) lack real-time validation in today’s volatile supply chain landscape.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Efficiency
Our AI-powered, human-verified database targets only Tier-1 optical suppliers meeting 28-point compliance criteria (ISO 13485, export licenses, ethical audits). The result? Systematic time elimination across your procurement cycle:
| Sourcing Phase | Traditional Approach (Hours) | SourcifyChina Pro List (Hours) | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier Vetting | 85 | 12 | 86% |
| Factory Capability Assessment | 42 | 5 | 88% |
| Compliance Validation | 20 | 0* | 100% |
| TOTAL PER PROJECT | 147 | 17 | 88% |
*Compliance docs pre-verified & stored in supplier profiles
Key Time-Saving Mechanisms:
✅ Pre-qualified Suppliers: Only factories with 3+ years of optical export experience & audited production lines.
✅ Real-Time Capacity Data: Live updates on MOQ flexibility, lead times, and tech capabilities (e.g., blue-light blocking lens production).
✅ Risk-Embedded Analytics: AI flags suppliers with historical quality disputes or customs violations.
✅ Single-Point Accountability: Dedicated SourcifyChina sourcing specialist manages all communications.
The 2026 Procurement Imperative: Speed + Certainty
In an era of razor-thin margins and supply chain disruption, time is your most critical KPI. Every hour spent on supplier validation delays time-to-market and increases exposure to:
– Cost volatility (raw material spikes during extended sourcing cycles)
– Reputational damage from defective batches (optical product recalls cost avg. $2.1M)
– Lost opportunity cost (competitors securing capacity via agile sourcing)
SourcifyChina’s Pro List transforms optical sourcing from a cost center into a strategic advantage – ensuring you access compliant, high-capacity partners in days, not months.
Your Action Plan: Secure 2026 Optical Sourcing Agility
Do not gamble with unverified suppliers. The cost of a single failed shipment outweighs 10 years of SourcifyChina’s service fees.
👉 Immediate Next Steps:
1. Request Your Custom Optical Pro List – Receive 5 pre-vetted suppliers matching your specs (frame type, volume, certifications) within 24 business hours.
2. Conduct Zero-Risk Factory Assessments – Leverage our embedded audit reports and sample management.
3. Lock Competitive Pricing – Our partners offer SourcifyChina clients preferential terms (avg. 8-12% below spot market).
Call to Action: Activate Your Verified Sourcing Advantage Today
“Time saved in sourcing is revenue earned in market.”
Contact our Optical Sourcing Team NOW to claim your Verified Pro List:
✉️ Email: [email protected]
💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160Mention code OPT2026 for:
– Complimentary sample coordination
– Priority factory audit scheduling
– 2026 regulatory compliance briefing (FDA/CE/GB)
All supplier data refreshed quarterly. Zero obligation consultation. 98% client retention rate since 2020.
SourcifyChina | Your Verified Path to China Sourcing Excellence
Data-Driven. Risk-Mitigated. Procurement-Optimized.
www.sourcifychina.com/optical-pro-list | © 2026 SourcifyChina. All Rights Reserved.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
