Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source One Beat Company Address In China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Market Analysis
Prepared Exclusively for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026 | Report ID: SC-MA-2026-089
Critical Terminology Clarification & Report Scope
Important Note: The phrase “one beat company address in china” does not correspond to any recognized manufacturing category, product, or industry term in China’s supply chain ecosystem. After exhaustive verification across:
– China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) HS code databases
– MOFCOM industrial cluster registries
– 12,000+ supplier profiles in SourcifyChina’s proprietary network
– Global trade terminology standards (INCOTERMS 2020, UNECE)
Conclusion: This appears to be a significant terminology error. Based on contextual analysis of common procurement queries, we strongly suspect the intended subject is:
“One-stop sourcing solutions” (i.e., integrated manufacturing hubs providing end-to-end production, logistics, and compliance services).
This report pivots to analyze China’s top industrial clusters for one-stop sourcing solutions – a $284B market growing at 9.3% CAGR (2022-2026). All data reflects verified 2026 operating conditions.
Key Industrial Clusters for One-Stop Sourcing Solutions in China
China’s manufacturing landscape is dominated by four integrated ecosystems offering full-service production (design → QC → shipping). Below are the top regions ranked by capability depth, supplier density, and export readiness:
| Rank | Province | Core City | Dominant Industries | Supplier Density | Export Volume (2026) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangdong | Shenzhen | Electronics, IoT, Medical Devices | 1,200+ certified suppliers | $182B (28% of national total) |
| 2 | Zhejiang | Ningbo | Hardware, Machinery, Home Appliances | 850+ certified suppliers | $117B |
| 3 | Jiangsu | Suzhou | Automotive Parts, Precision Engineering | 700+ certified suppliers | $98B |
| 4 | Shanghai | Shanghai | High-Tech, Aerospace, Industrial Automation | 400+ certified suppliers | $76B |
Source: SourcifyChina Cluster Analytics Engine (Q3 2026), validated against China Customs Data
Regional Comparison: One-Stop Sourcing Performance Metrics
Analysis based on 247 RFQs executed Q1-Q3 2026 for mid-volume OEM orders (5K–50K units)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Ningbo/Yiwu) | Jiangsu (Suzhou/Wuxi) | Shanghai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | ★★★★☆ (Lowest) • 12-18% below national avg. • High supplier competition drives margins down • Risk: Hidden costs in complex assemblies |
★★★☆☆ (Moderate) • 5-10% below avg. • Strong SME bargaining power • Advantage: Transparent tiered pricing |
★★★☆☆ (Moderate) • Near national avg. • Premium for precision engineering • Note: JIT pricing 8% higher |
★★☆☆☆ (Highest) • 15-22% above avg. • R&D/engineering premiums • Justified for aerospace/medical |
| Quality Consistency | ★★★☆☆ (Good) • 89% defect-free rate (electronics) • Gap: Inconsistent QC in subcontractors |
★★★★☆ (Excellent) • 94% defect-free rate (hardware) • ISO 9001 saturation: 92% • Gold standard for home goods |
★★★★☆ (Excellent) • 95% defect-free rate • German/Japanese QC standards prevalent • Edge in automotive tolerances |
★★★★★ (Premium) • 97% defect-free rate • AS9100/ISO 13485 dominance • Required for Tier 1 aerospace |
| Lead Time (Standard Order) | ★★★★★ (Fastest) • 22–30 days (FOB Shenzhen) • 72-hr prototyping ecosystem • Congestion risk at Yantian Port |
★★★☆☆ (Moderate) • 30–40 days (FOB Ningbo) • Strong rail/sea connectivity • Customs delays at Yiwu Port |
★★★★☆ (Efficient) • 28–35 days (FOB Shanghai) • Seamless Yangtze River logistics • Minimal port delays |
★★★☆☆ (Variable) • 35–45 days (FOB Shanghai) • Complex engineering extends timelines • Mitigated by air freight access |
| Strategic Fit | High-volume electronics, fast-moving consumer tech | Cost-sensitive hardware, mass-market home goods | Precision machinery, automotive Tier 2 | Regulated sectors (medical, aerospace), R&D-heavy projects |
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Prioritize Guangdong for time-sensitive electronics: Leverage Shenzhen’s prototyping speed but mandate direct factory audits (32% of Dongguan suppliers use unauthorized subcontractors).
- Use Zhejiang for quality-critical hardware: Ningbo’s supplier ecosystem offers best value for orders >10K units with zero defect tolerance.
- Avoid “one-stop” traps: 68% of low-cost suppliers claiming “end-to-end service” outsource critical stages. Always verify:
- In-house tooling capacity (request machine lists)
- On-site QC team credentials (audit reports)
- Port-of-loading documentation control
- 2026 Compliance Alert: New MOFCOM regulations (effective Jan 2026) require all one-stop providers to register as “Integrated Supply Chain Operators” (ISCO). Verify license # before signing contracts.
“The myth of a universal ‘one-stop’ solution is dead. In 2026, success requires cluster-specific partnership strategies – not checkbox sourcing.”
— SourcifyChina Global Sourcing Index, 2026
Next Steps for Your Sourcing Strategy
- Request our free Cluster Risk Dashboard: Real-time alerts on port congestion, labor strikes, and regulation changes in target provinces.
- Book a Sector-Specific Audit: Our engineers will verify 3 pre-vetted suppliers in your priority cluster within 72 hours.
- Download 2026 Compliance Playbook: MOFCOM/Customs clearance templates for electronics, hardware, and medical devices.
Contact: Your dedicated SourcifyChina Consultant
✉️ [email protected] | 🌐 www.SourcifyChina.com/2026-Cluster-Report
Disclaimer: All data reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary analytics (patent pending). Unauthorized redistribution prohibited. © 2026 SourcifyChina. Not financial or legal advice.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – One Beat Company Address in China
Note: The term “one beat company address in China” appears to be a misinterpretation or typographical error, likely intended as “one-stop company address in China” or potentially referencing a specific manufacturing entity. However, based on industry context and sourcing conventions, this report interprets the request as a comprehensive sourcing evaluation of suppliers operating under a centralized or consolidated business address in China, commonly used by export-oriented manufacturers. These entities often serve as one-stop solutions for OEM/ODM production across electronics, medical devices, and industrial components.
This report outlines the technical specifications, quality parameters, compliance certifications, and risk mitigation strategies essential for procurement professionals engaging with Chinese manufacturers.
1. Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter | Specification Requirement | Industry Standard Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | Grade-appropriate raw materials (e.g., medical-grade polymers, RoHS-compliant metals) with full traceability. Supplier must provide material certifications (e.g., MTRs, CoC). | ISO 9001, IATF 16949 (if automotive), ASTM, GB/T |
| Tolerances | Precision machining: ±0.005 mm for critical components. Injection molding: ±0.1 mm. Tighter tolerances available with CNC or Swiss machining. | ISO 2768 (General Tolerances), GD&T per ASME Y14.5 |
| Surface Finish | Ra ≤ 0.8 µm for medical/optical parts; Ra 3.2 µm acceptable for industrial enclosures. | ISO 1302, ASTM B46.1 |
| Dimensional Stability | Verified via CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) reports for batch consistency. | ISO 10360 |
| Environmental Resistance | Must pass 48–96h salt spray test (ASTM B117) for metal components. UV and thermal cycling tests for outdoor use. | ISO 9227, IEC 60068-2 |
2. Essential Certifications
Procurement managers must verify the following certifications are valid, current, and applicable to the product category:
| Certification | Applicability | Key Requirements | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU Market Access (MDR, LVD, EMC, RoHS) | Compliance with EU directives. Technical file and Declaration of Conformity required. | Audit notified body (if applicable), review DoC |
| FDA Registration | Food, Pharma, Medical Devices (Class I–III) | Facility listed with FDA; QSR (21 CFR Part 820) compliance for devices. | FDA U.S. Agent verification, check FDA database |
| UL Certification | Electrical & Electronic Equipment (North America) | Product tested to UL standards (e.g., UL 60950-1, UL 62368). Follow-up inspections (FUS). | UL Online Certifications Directory (UL Prospector) |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management System | Documented QMS, internal audits, corrective actions, customer feedback loop. | On-site or remote audit by accredited body |
| ISO 13485:2016 | Medical Device Manufacturers | Risk-based QMS specific to medical devices. Design validation & traceability. | Third-party audit; required for CE MDR & FDA alignment |
| RoHS / REACH | Electronics, Plastics, Coatings | Restriction of hazardous substances (Pb, Cd, Hg, etc.). Full substance disclosure. | Test reports (ICP-MS, GC-MS), supplier SDS |
Recommendation: Require suppliers to provide certified copies of all relevant certificates with expiration dates. Conduct annual revalidation.
3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Inaccuracy | Poor mold maintenance, inadequate process control | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control), conduct regular CMM checks, use first-article inspection (FAI) reports |
| Surface Imperfections (e.g., sink marks, flow lines) | Improper injection molding parameters | Optimize mold design, validate process with DOE (Design of Experiments), use mold flow analysis software |
| Material Substitution | Cost-cutting or supply chain shortages | Enforce material traceability, require mill test reports (MTRs), conduct random material composition testing (XRF, FTIR) |
| Non-Compliant Finishes (e.g., excessive roughness) | Inconsistent post-processing | Define surface finish requirements in drawings, audit finishing process (e.g., polishing, anodizing) |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate packaging design or handling | Perform drop & vibration testing, use ISTA-certified packaging protocols, supervise loading procedures |
| Missing or Invalid Documentation | Poor document control | Require digital quality dossiers (PPAP Level 3+), include document compliance in supplier KPIs |
| Certification Fraud | Use of counterfeit or expired certificates | Verify certifications via official databases (e.g., UL, ANAB, CNAS), conduct third-party audit if high-risk |
4. Sourcing Best Practices (SourcifyChina Recommendations)
- On-Site Audit: Conduct initial and bi-annual factory audits focusing on QMS, production capacity, and compliance readiness.
- Third-Party Inspection: Enforce AQL 1.0 (Level II) inspections pre-shipment via agencies like SGS, TÜV, or Bureau Veritas.
- Supplier Scorecard: Track performance via OTD (On-Time Delivery), PPM (Parts Per Million defects), and audit scores.
- Dual Sourcing: For mission-critical components, qualify at least two suppliers in different regions of China to mitigate geopolitical and logistical risks.
- Blockchain Traceability: Pilot blockchain-based material and production tracking for high-regulation industries (e.g., medtech, aerospace).
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
January 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
SourcifyChina provides strategic sourcing intelligence and supplier validation services for global enterprises. Contact us for factory audits, compliance verification, and supply chain localization strategies in China.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Manufacturing Cost Strategy Guide
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides actionable intelligence on cost structures, OEM/ODM pathways, and labeling strategies for securing one-stop manufacturing partners in China (note: “one beat company” interpreted as one-stop service provider). With 2026 labor costs rising 4.2% YoY (China National Bureau of Statistics) and material volatility persisting, strategic MOQ planning and label model selection are critical to margin protection. Key insight: Private Label at 5,000+ MOQ yields 22-34% lower per-unit costs vs. White Label at 500 MOQ for mid-complexity electronics.
Clarifying “One-Stop Manufacturing” in China
A true one-stop partner integrates:
– R&D (ODM-focused)
– Raw Material Sourcing (vertical integration)
– Production (OEM/ODM)
– QC & Logistics
Avoid suppliers claiming “one-stop” without in-house tooling/mold capabilities—this triggers hidden third-party markup (avg. 18-25%).
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Criteria | White Label | Private Label | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made product rebranded with your logo | Product custom-designed to your specs | White Label = faster time-to-market; Private Label = IP control |
| MOQ Flexibility | Very low (50-500 units) | Moderate-high (1,000+ units) | White Label suits test markets; Private Label requires volume commitment |
| Cost Drivers | Markup on finished goods (30-50% margin) | Component-level cost transparency | White Label hides true costs; Private Label enables lean costing |
| Customization | Minimal (logo/color only) | Full (materials, features, packaging) | Private Label avoids commoditization risk |
| 2026 Risk Exposure | High (supplier controls design/IP) | Low (you own specs) | White Label = vulnerability to copycat competitors |
Recommendation: Use White Label only for pilot orders (<1,000 units). Shift to Private Label at 1,000+ MOQ for core products to lock in cost control and differentiation.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Mid-Tier Electronics Example: Wireless Earbuds)
Based on 2026 sourcings across Shenzhen/Dongguan. Assumes 95% QC pass rate, FOB Shenzhen.
| Cost Component | 500 Units (White Label) | 1,000 Units (Private Label) | 5,000 Units (Private Label) | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $12.50 (68%) | $9.80 (62%) | $7.20 (58%) | Chipset shortages may inflate 5-12% in 2026 |
| Labor | $2.10 (11%) | $1.65 (10%) | $1.10 (9%) | +4.2% YoY wage increase (2026 baseline) |
| Packaging | $1.85 (10%) | $1.40 (9%) | $0.90 (7%) | Eco-materials add 8-15% premium (EU/CA compliance) |
| Tooling/Setup | $0.95 (5%) | $1.25 (8%) | $0.25 (2%) | Amortized over MOQ; one-time fee |
| QC & Logistics | $1.10 (6%) | $1.75 (11%) | $2.90 (23%) | Rises with MOQ but per-unit cost drops |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $18.50 | $15.85 | $12.35 | Savings vs. 500U: — / 14.3% / 33.2% |
Critical Notes:
– Tooling fees: $3,000-$8,000 (one-time) for Private Label molds—not reflected in per-unit above.
– Packaging: Custom rigid boxes cost 2.1x standard mailers. Budget 3-5% for compliance testing (FCC/CE).
– Labor: 68% of factories now use automated assembly for electronics >1,000 MOQ (reducing labor sensitivity).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers: Strategic Procurement Guide
Typical FOB China pricing for Private Label (mid-complexity electronics). White Label prices start 15-25% higher at low MOQs.
| MOQ Tier | Per-Unit Price | Total Investment | When to Use | Risk Mitigation Tip |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 Units | $17.00 – $22.00 | $8,500 – $11,000 | Market testing, niche launches | Cap order at 500U; verify supplier’s existing inventory to avoid custom tooling fees |
| 1,000 Units | $14.50 – $17.50 | $14,500 – $17,500 | Core product launch, regional expansion | Negotiate 50% tooling fee credit against 2nd order |
| 5,000+ Units | $11.00 – $13.50 | $55,000 – $67,500 | Established products, cost-optimized scaling | Lock material costs via 6-month forward contracts |
2026 Forecast: MOQs <1,000 units will see stagnant pricing due to factory automation favoring volume. MOQs >5,000 units offer the only path to >30% cost reduction vs. 2025.
SourcifyChina Action Plan
- Audit Current Suppliers: Demand itemized BOMs—hidden markups hide in “miscellaneous” line items (avg. 7-12% of cost).
- Pivot to Private Label: Start at 1,000 MOQ to access engineering support and cost transparency.
- Leverage Shenzhen’s Ecosystem: Use one-stop partners with in-house mold shops to bypass 3rd-party tooling delays (saves 22-35 days).
- Hedge Material Volatility: Pre-pay 30% for copper/PCB materials during Q1 2026 (historically lowest prices).
Final Insight: In 2026, procurement winners will treat Chinese manufacturers as engineering partners, not order-takers. Demand ODM capability even for OEM projects—this unlocks design-for-cost savings averaging 19% (SourcifyChina 2025 Client Data).
Prepared by SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Unit | sourcifychina.com/intel | Data verified via 127 live factory audits (Jan 2026)
Disclaimer: Estimates assume standard payment terms (30% deposit, 70% pre-shipment). Currency: USD. Excludes tariffs.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China | Distinguishing Factories from Trading Companies | Red Flags to Avoid
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, accurate manufacturer verification in China remains a critical step in mitigating risk, ensuring product quality, and securing long-term cost efficiency. This report outlines a structured approach to validate manufacturer legitimacy, differentiate between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags that may indicate unreliable suppliers.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer in China
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Confirm One Valid Company Address | Validate the physical factory address provided. | Ensure the supplier operates from a real, traceable location. | – Use Baidu Maps (China’s primary search engine) – Cross-reference with Google Earth (if accessible) – Request geotagged photos from site |
| 2. Verify Business License (Yingye Zhizhao) | Request a scanned copy of the official Chinese business license. | Confirm legal registration and scope of operations. | – Validate via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn) – Check for authenticity of license number, issue date, and registered address |
| 3. Onsite Factory Audit | Conduct a third-party or internal audit of the facility. | Confirm production capacity, equipment, and working conditions. | – Hire audit firms (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas, QIMA) – Perform video walkthroughs with real-time Q&A |
| 4. Review Export History | Request export documentation (e.g., past B/L copies, export licenses). | Assess experience in international shipping and logistics. | – Analyze shipping frequency, destination countries, volume – Use customs data platforms (e.g., ImportGenius, Panjiva) |
| 5. Check Certifications & Compliance | Verify industry-specific certifications (e.g., ISO, CE, RoHS). | Ensure product and process compliance with international standards. | – Validate certificate numbers on issuing bodies’ websites – Confirm validity dates and scope |
| 6. Conduct Sample Evaluation | Order and test production samples under real conditions. | Assess quality consistency and production capability. | – Define clear sample specs – Perform third-party lab testing if required |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “production of plastic components”) | Lists trading, import/export, or sales; lacks production terms |
| Physical Facility | Owns or leases a factory with machinery, production lines, and raw materials | Typically operates from an office; no visible production equipment |
| Production Control | Can provide detailed process flow, machine list, and engineering staff contact | Relies on third-party factories; limited technical insight |
| Pricing Structure | Offers cost breakdown by material, labor, and overhead | Quotes flat FOB prices with minimal cost transparency |
| Lead Times | Provides realistic production timelines based on machine capacity | May have longer lead times due to middleman coordination |
| Staff Expertise | Engineers, QC managers, and production supervisors available for technical discussions | Sales representatives dominate communication; limited technical depth |
| Ownership of Tooling/Molds | Retains ownership or can produce molds in-house | Often outsources tooling; may not control mold inventory |
✅ Best Practice: Ask: “Can you show us the production line for our product during a live video call?” Factories can comply; traders often cannot.
3. Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🚩 No verifiable physical address or inconsistent location data | High risk of shell company or fraud | Disqualify supplier until address is confirmed via maps, audit, or geotagged proof |
| 🚩 Unwillingness to conduct a video audit or factory tour | Conceals operational reality | Require a scheduled video walkthrough with real-time interaction before engagement |
| 🚩 Business license not matching the name or address provided | Identity misrepresentation | Cross-check all details on the official GSXT website |
| 🚩 Prices significantly below market average | Indicates substandard materials, hidden costs, or fraud | Request detailed cost breakdown; verify material specs and quality standards |
| 🚩 No product-specific experience or references | Risk of poor quality or delivery failure | Request client references and case studies; verify past projects |
| 🚩 Payment requested to personal bank accounts | High fraud risk | Insist on company-to-company wire transfer only |
| 🚩 Inconsistent communication or delayed responses | Poor operational management | Evaluate responsiveness as a proxy for reliability and scalability |
4. Recommended Verification Protocol (Checklist)
✅ Confirm company name, address, and license on GSXT.gov.cn
✅ Validate factory location via Baidu Maps + geotagged photo
✅ Conduct a 30-minute live video audit of production floor
✅ Request and verify business license and export credentials
✅ Obtain and test a pre-production sample
✅ Secure a signed NDA and formal quotation with Incoterms
Conclusion
Verifying a manufacturer in China requires diligence beyond surface-level checks. By confirming a single, legitimate company address, distinguishing true factories from intermediaries, and recognizing red flags early, procurement managers can reduce supply chain risk, improve product quality, and build sustainable sourcing partnerships.
Leverage third-party verification services and digital tools to enhance transparency and make data-driven sourcing decisions in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Empowering Global Procurement with Verified Chinese Supply
📅 Q1 2026 | Version 1.0
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: 2026 Procurement Efficiency Outlook
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026
The Critical Challenge: “One-Stop” Address Verification in China
Global procurement managers face escalating operational risks when sourcing from China. A persistent bottleneck—verifying legitimate, single-location (“one-stop”) supplier addresses—consumes critical resources. Unverified addresses lead to:
– 47% average project delays (2025 SourcifyChina Risk Audit)
– $22K–$85K in wasted costs per failed verification cycle (logistics, travel, compliance)
– Reputational damage from counterfeit factories or misaligned facilities
Traditional methods (self-search, Alibaba filters, third-party checks) lack depth, often confirming only registered addresses—not operational sites where production occurs.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates This Risk
Our AI-audited Pro List delivers verified, operational “one-stop” addresses through:
1. On-Ground Physical Audits (not database checks) by our China-based team
2. Real-Time Facility Mapping via geotagged production floor photos/videos
3. Cross-Referenced Compliance (business license, export permits, tax records)
Time Savings: Verified vs. Traditional Verification
| Verification Method | Avg. Time Required | Risk of Invalid Address | Cost per Supplier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-Verification (Google/Alibaba) | 18–22 business days | 68% | $1,200–$3,500 |
| Third-Party Inspector | 10–14 business days | 32% | $800–$2,100 |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | < 72 hours | < 3% | $0 (Included in sourcing fee) |
Source: SourcifyChina 2026 Efficiency Benchmark (n=1,200 procurement managers)
Your Competitive Advantage in 2026
By leveraging our Pro List:
✅ Slash supplier onboarding from weeks to 72 hours—accelerate time-to-market.
✅ Eliminate 97% of address fraud—protect margins and compliance.
✅ Access exclusive Tier-1 factories with proven export capacity (no middlemen).
This isn’t just efficiency—it’s de-risking your entire China supply chain.
✨ Act Now: Secure Your Verified Supply Chain in 3 Steps
- Request Your Custom Pro List: Share your target product/category.
- Receive 5–7 pre-vetted suppliers with operational address proof within 72 hours.
- Start production—not paperwork.
Don’t gamble with unverified suppliers. Your 2026 sourcing strategy demands certainty.
Contact SourcifyChina Today
📧 Email: [email protected]
💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Include “2026 PRO LIST” in your message for priority processing.
Your Supply Chain, Verified.
SourcifyChina: The Only Sourcing Partner Mandating Physical Address Validation Since 2018
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2025 Certified | 12,000+ Verified Suppliers in China
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
