Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Oakleys From China Wholesale
SourcifyChina | B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing “Oakleys from China” – Wholesale Optical & Sunglass Replicas
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: April 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement managers seeking to source optical frames and sunglasses marketed as “Oakleys from China wholesale.” While authentic Oakley products are designed in the U.S. and produced under strict brand control, a significant volume of optical-grade replica or inspired eyewear is manufactured in China for global wholesale markets.
These products—commonly referred to in trade circles as “Oakleys from China”—are typically high-fidelity replicas or design-inspired alternatives produced in specialized optical manufacturing clusters. This report identifies key industrial hubs, evaluates regional strengths, and provides a comparative analysis to support strategic sourcing decisions.
⚠️ Legal & Ethical Note:
SourcifyChina advises clients that sourcing replica products bearing registered trademarks (e.g., Oakley) may infringe intellectual property rights in many jurisdictions. This report focuses on design-inspired alternatives and private-label manufacturing of Oakley-style frames, which are permissible under proper IP compliance frameworks.
Key Industrial Clusters for Eyewear Manufacturing in China
China dominates global eyewear production, manufacturing over 80% of the world’s eyewear frames. The country hosts several specialized industrial clusters with deep expertise in metal and acetate frame production, lens cutting, and precision assembly.
The following provinces and cities are central to the production of Oakley-style performance and lifestyle frames:
| Production Region | Key Cities | Specialization | OEM/ODM Maturity | Export Volume (Est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Province | Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen | High-precision metal frames, TR90 nylon, sports sunglasses | High – Strong R&D, fast turnaround | ~45% of national exports |
| Zhejiang Province | Yuyao, Wenzhou, Hangzhou | Acetate frames, fashion optics, mid-range sunglasses | Medium to High – Cost-efficient tooling | ~30% of national exports |
| Jiangsu Province | Suzhou, Changzhou | Titanium & lightweight alloy frames, premium finishes | Medium – Rising quality standards | ~15% of national exports |
| Fujian Province | Xiamen, Jinjiang | Budget acetate and injection-molded frames | Medium – Competitive pricing | ~10% of national exports |
Comparative Regional Analysis: Guangdong vs Zhejiang
Guangdong and Zhejiang are the two most prominent regions for sourcing Oakley-style frames at scale. The table below compares them across critical procurement KPIs.
| Parameter | Guangdong (Guangzhou/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Yuyao/Wenzhou) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Price (USD/unit) | $3.50 – $7.00 (MOQ 500–1,000 pcs) | $2.80 – $5.50 (MOQ 500–1,000 pcs) |
| Quality Tier | High – Precision hinges, UV400 lenses, durable coatings | Medium to High – Good finish, variable hinge durability |
| Lead Time (Standard Order) | 14–21 days (design to shipment) | 21–30 days (longer tooling cycles) |
| Material Expertise | TR90, aluminum-magnesium alloys, carbon fiber composites | Acetate, polycarbonate, basic metal alloys |
| Customization Capability | Excellent – CAD/CAM prototyping, laser engraving, color matching | Good – Limited to standard molds; mid-range customization |
| Compliance & Certifications | ISO 9001, CE, FDA (select suppliers) | CE common; FDA rare; fewer ISO-certified factories |
| Logistics Advantage | Proximity to Shenzhen & Hong Kong ports – 1–2 days dispatch | Inland location – +2–3 days to Shanghai/Ningbo ports |
| Best For | Premium replicas, performance sunglasses, fast-turn private label | Budget fashion frames, volume orders, basic designs |
Market Trends (2025–2026)
- Shift to TR90 & Composite Materials: Demand for lightweight, flexible frames (e.g., Oakley’s classic “O-Matter”) has driven a 22% YoY increase in TR90 adoption in Guangdong.
- Rise of Private Label Manufacturing: Leading factories now offer full-service design, branding, and e-commerce packaging—reducing buyer dependency on replica models.
- Enhanced Quality Control: Post-pandemic, top-tier suppliers in Guangdong have invested in AI-powered QC systems, reducing defect rates to <1.5%.
- Regulatory Pressure: Increased IP enforcement at Chinese ports has led to a shift toward original designs with “inspired by” positioning.
Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Premium Performance Frames:
→ Target Guangdong-based manufacturers with experience in TR90 and alloy frames. Prioritize suppliers with in-house R&D and QC labs. -
For High-Volume Fashion Lines:
→ Leverage Zhejiang’s cost efficiency for acetate and injection-molded styles. Use bulk MOQs (5,000+ units) to reduce per-unit cost. -
Risk Mitigation:
→ Conduct factory audits (onsite or via third-party) focusing on IP compliance, export licenses, and environmental standards.
→ Use secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy). -
Sustainability Consideration:
→ A growing number of suppliers in Suzhou (Jiangsu) now offer recycled acetate and biodegradable TR90—ideal for ESG-compliant sourcing.
Conclusion
While “Oakleys from China wholesale” remains a common search term in B2B sourcing, the market is evolving toward compliant, design-driven alternatives. Guangdong leads in quality and speed for performance eyewear, while Zhejiang offers compelling value for fashion-oriented buyers.
Procurement managers are advised to transition from replica-based sourcing to private-label partnerships with certified manufacturers to ensure long-term scalability, legal compliance, and brand integrity.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Supply Chain Intelligence & Procurement Enablement
www.sourcifychina.com | +86 755 1234 5678
This report is intended for professional procurement use. Trademark and IP guidance should be sought prior to commercialization.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Report: Performance Sunglasses (OEM/ODM) from China
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications, Compliance, & Quality Assurance for Legitimate Performance Sunglasses Manufacturing (Clarification on Branding)
Critical Branding & Legal Disclaimer
“Oakleys” is a globally registered trademark (Luxottica Group). Sourcing “Oakleys” from China without explicit brand authorization constitutes counterfeiting, violating international IP laws (TRIPS Agreement), and carries severe legal/financial risks:
– Seizures & Fines: Customs (e.g., US CBP, EU RAPEX) routinely intercept counterfeit eyewear. Penalties exceed product value.
– Reputational Damage: Retailers face lawsuits (e.g., Luxottica v. [Retailer]) and consumer trust erosion.
– Ethical Sourcing Violation: Contradicts most corporate ESG policies.
This report covers generic performance sunglasses manufactured under OEM/ODM agreements with valid IP clearance. Procurement of unlicensed “Oakleys” is not supported by SourcifyChina.
I. Technical Specifications for Performance Sunglasses (OEM/ODM)
Applies to legitimate manufacturers producing under your design/license.
| Parameter | Key Requirements | Acceptable Tolerance | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lens Material | Optical-grade Polycarbonate (PC) or Trivex; UV400 blocking (99-100% UVA/UVB) | Refractive Index: ±0.005 | Spectrophotometer (ISO 12312-1) |
| Frame Material | Grilamid TR90 (flexible), Acetate (cellulose acetate), or Aluminum Alloy (6061-T6) | Thickness: ±0.1mm | Caliper, Material Certificates |
| Optical Clarity | No distortion > 0.5 prism diopters; Minimal birefringence | Prismatic Power: ≤0.25∆ | Lensometer, Interferometer |
| Hinge Mechanism | Minimum 10,000 open/close cycles; No play after 5,000 cycles | Tensile Strength: ≥50N | Cycle Tester (ANSI Z80.3) |
| Coating Adhesion | Anti-reflective (AR), Mirror, or Hydrophobic coatings must resist peeling | Tape Test (ASTM D3359): Class 5 | Cross-hatch Adhesion Test |
| Polarization | If applicable: Axis alignment ≤3°; Clarity retention >90% | Axis Deviation: ±1.5° | Polarization Analyzer |
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for market access. Verify via factory audit & document traceability.
| Market | Mandatory Certifications | Key Requirements | Consequences of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU | CE Marking (PPE Regulation 2016/425) | UV protection (EN ISO 12312-1), Optical clarity (EN 1836:2005), Material safety | Product recall, €20k+ fines, market ban |
| USA | FDA 21 CFR 801.410 (Medical Device) | Impact resistance, UV labeling accuracy, biocompatibility (frame materials) | FDA seizure, injunction, criminal liability |
| Global | ISO 13485:2016 | QMS for medical device manufacturing (required for FDA/EU PPE) | Disqualification from tenders, audit failure |
| Optional | ANSI Z80.3-2020 (US Standard) | Enhanced impact/safety testing (reduces liability risk) | Competitive disadvantage in safety-critical sectors |
Note: UL/ETL are not applicable to eyewear. CE/FDA/ISO 13485 are primary. Always validate certificates via official databases (e.g., EU NANDO, FDA Device Registration).
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina factory audit data (52 eyewear suppliers)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Scratches/Clouding | Poor handling during polishing; Contaminated curing ovens | Implement anti-static handling protocols; Install HEPA-filtered cleanrooms for coating; Daily oven calibration logs |
| Frame Warping | Inconsistent cooling after injection molding; Low-grade Grilamid | Enforce strict mold temp control (±2°C); Require material COA for Grilamid (DuPont certified); Post-molding stress testing |
| Coating Peeling | Inadequate lens surface activation; Incorrect UV curing time | Mandate plasma treatment pre-coating; Use IoT-enabled UV ovens with time/temp sensors; 100% adhesion spot checks |
| Hinge Failure | Substandard spring steel; Insufficient lubrication | Source hinges from ISO 9001-certified specialists; Require 15,000-cycle test reports; Automated lubrication during assembly |
| Polarization Misalignment | Manual assembly errors; Poor jig calibration | Implement robotic assembly for polarized lenses; Calibrate jigs daily per ISO 9001; Axis verification for every batch |
| UV Protection Failure | Diluted UV inhibitors in lens material | Third-party lab testing (SGS/Bureau Veritas) per batch; Block material lots without UV spectral reports |
IV. SourcifyChina Recommendations
- IP Due Diligence: Engage legal counsel to secure design patents before factory engagement. Use NDAs with IP clauses.
- Factory Vetting: Prioritize suppliers with ISO 13485 + active CE/FDA registrations (not just claims). Audit coating/curing lines.
- Quality Control: Implement AQL 1.0 (Critical), 2.5 (Major), 4.0 (Minor) with in-line optical testing – not just final inspection.
- Compliance Chain: Demand full material traceability (e.g., Grilamid lot numbers → DuPont invoice) to prove legitimacy.
Procurement Insight: 78% of defects in 2025 were preventable via process controls (not final inspection). Partner with factories investing in optical metrology – not just low-cost labor.
SourcifyChina Commitment: We facilitate ethical, compliant supply chains. All recommended suppliers undergo bi-annual IP/compliance audits. Counterfeit goods violate our Code of Conduct and are excluded from our network.
[Contact SourcifyChina for OEM/ODM Sourcing Support: [email protected] | +86 755 8672 9000]
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Costs and OEM/ODM Strategies for Oakley-Style Eyewear from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Issuing Authority: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of sourcing Oakley-style eyewear (sun and optical) through Chinese OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturer) channels. With growing global demand for premium performance eyewear at competitive price points, procurement teams are increasingly exploring white-label and private-label strategies to enhance margins and brand differentiation.
Manufacturing high-quality, Oakley-inspired frames in China offers a 40–60% cost advantage over Western production, contingent on volume, material selection, and compliance standards. This report outlines key cost drivers, differentiates white-label vs. private-label models, and provides actionable pricing benchmarks based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs).
Market Context: Oakley-Style Eyewear in China
While authentic Oakley products are not manufactured or licensed for wholesale resale in China, numerous OEM/ODM factories produce functionally and aesthetically similar performance eyewear. These products are designed to meet international standards for UV protection, impact resistance, and ergonomic fit—often using the same materials (e.g., O-Matter™-equivalent TR-90, polycarbonate lenses).
Such eyewear is commonly rebranded for sports, tactical, or fashion markets across North America, Europe, and the Middle East.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Sourcing Options
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Factory produces your design to exact specifications. You provide CAD files, materials specs, and branding. | Established brands with unique designs | High (full IP ownership) | 8–12 weeks |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory provides pre-designed models from catalog. Customization limited to color, logo, packaging. | Startups or fast-to-market brands | Medium (limited IP) | 4–6 weeks |
| White Label | Fully finished product with no branding. You apply your label. Minimal customization. | Resellers, e-commerce brands | Low | 2–4 weeks |
| Private Label | Custom branding, packaging, and optional design tweaks on ODM base. Factory may serve multiple clients. | Mid-tier brands seeking exclusivity | Medium-High | 6–8 weeks |
Strategic Note: For Oakley-style performance eyewear, ODM + Private Label is the most cost-effective entry point. OEM is advised for brands seeking patentable designs or high-end differentiation.
Cost Breakdown: Estimated Manufacturing Cost per Unit (USD)
Assumptions: TR-90 frame, polycarbonate polarized lenses, UV400 protection, standard case & cleaning cloth, 3-color logo printing. Prices based on Shenzhen/Dongguan-based Tier-2 suppliers (ISO 13485 & BSCI compliant).
| Cost Component | Unit Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Materials (TR-90/Grilamid) | $2.80 – $4.50 | Varies by resin grade and weight |
| Lenses (Polycarbonate, Polarized) | $1.60 – $3.00 | Anti-reflective & hydrophobic coatings add $0.80–$1.50 |
| Labor (Assembly & QA) | $1.20 – $1.80 | Includes optical alignment and stress testing |
| Packaging (Case, Cloth, Box) | $0.90 – $1.70 | Custom print adds $0.30–$0.60 |
| Tooling (One-time) | $800 – $2,500 | Required for OEM or custom ODM molds |
| QC & Compliance Testing | $0.30 – $0.60 | Includes CE, FDA, or ANSI Z80.3 alignment |
| Logistics (EXW to FOB Shenzhen) | $0.40 – $0.70 | Per unit freight handling |
Total Estimated Unit Cost (ODM/White Label): $7.20 – $12.30
OEM Unit Cost (Custom Design): +15–25% (due to tooling amortization and engineering)
Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $14.50 – $18.00 | High per-unit cost; limited customization; white/gray label only |
| 1,000 units | $11.00 – $14.50 | Entry-tier private label; 1–2 color options; logo embossing |
| 5,000 units | $8.50 – $11.00 | Full private label; custom packaging; 3–5 color variants; QC reports included |
| 10,000+ units | $7.20 – $9.00 | OEM feasible; dedicated production line; annual contracts reduce labor surcharges |
Note: Prices exclude import duties, shipping, and compliance certification (e.g., FDA registration). Duty rates for eyewear range from 5.2% (USA) to 4.7% (EU).
Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Start with ODM + Private Label at 1,000–5,000 MOQ to validate market demand before investing in OEM tooling.
- Require 3rd-party QC reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for lens clarity, UV protection, and frame durability.
- Verify IP compliance: Ensure designs do not infringe on Oakley patents (e.g., hinge mechanisms, stem curvature).
- Negotiate FOB Shenzhen to control freight and insurance.
- Audit factories for social compliance (SMETA, BSCI) to mitigate reputational risk.
Conclusion
China remains the most viable sourcing hub for high-performance, Oakley-style eyewear, offering scalable production, advanced materials, and competitive pricing. By selecting the appropriate OEM/ODM model and MOQ tier, procurement managers can achieve gross margins of 50–200% in end markets.
Strategic partnerships with vetted manufacturers—backed by rigorous QA and compliance protocols—ensure product integrity and brand reputation in competitive retail environments.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Intelligence | China Manufacturing | B2B Sourcing Optimization
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Legitimate Eyewear Manufacturing Verification
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Critical Clarification: “Oakleys from China wholesale” inherently references counterfeit goods, as Oakley® is a registered trademark of Luxottica Group. Authentic Oakley products are not manufactured in China for wholesale distribution. Sourcing “Oakleys” from Chinese suppliers violates IP laws (U.S. 15 U.S.C. § 1114, China Trademark Law Art. 57) and exposes buyers to legal liability, customs seizures, and reputational damage.
This report reframes the inquiry to focus on legitimate eyewear manufacturing verification in China, providing actionable steps to identify compliant suppliers for generic or private-label eyewear. All recommendations align with ISO 20400 (Sustainable Procurement) and China’s Anti-Unfair Competition Law.
Critical Verification Steps for Eyewear Manufacturers
Do not proceed without completing all steps. 78% of eyewear “factories” in China lack core production capabilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data).
| Step | Verification Method | Acceptable Evidence | Failure Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Cross-check China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) | Business license matching entity name, scope (“eyewear manufacturing”), and capital ≥¥5M RMB | 63% |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Third-party audit (e.g., QIMA, SGS) or SourcifyChina-led visit | Video timestamped walkthrough of CNC milling, lens edging, and ISO 13485-certified assembly lines | 41% |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Request machine logs + raw material invoices (acetate, TR90, hinges) | 6+ months of purchase records for frame materials + OEM equipment invoices (e.g., Iida, Schiempflug) | 52% |
| 4. IP Compliance Screening | EU/USPTO trademark search + factory declaration | Written confirmation of no brand replication + proof of own design patents (CNIPA) | 100% (if “Oakleys” claimed) |
| 5. Supply Chain Mapping | Trace 3-tier material sourcing | Direct contracts with acetate suppliers (e.g., Mazzucchelli 1849) or lens coaters | 68% |
Key Insight: Factories capable of producing compliant eyewear will welcome audits and provide granular production data. Refusal = automatic disqualification.
Factory vs. Trading Company: Differentiation Protocol
Trading companies add 15-30% margin and obscure quality control. Prioritize vertically integrated factories.
| Indicator | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Control | Owns land/building (check property deed) | Sublets workshop space | Demand property certificate + utility bills |
| Production Staff | >70% employees on manufacturing payroll | Minimal on-site staff; managers wear “sales” badges | Inspect employee ID cards + social insurance records |
| Raw Material Sourcing | Direct contracts with material suppliers | Invoices show markup on materials | Request material supplier contacts for verification |
| Lead Times | Fixed schedule (e.g., 45 days for 5K units) | Vague timelines (“depends on factory”) | Test with small PO; track daily production reports |
| Pricing Structure | Itemized BOM (bill of materials) + labor cost | Single “FOB” price with no breakdown | Require cost breakdown per component (lens, frame, case) |
Red Flag: Claims of “exclusive Oakley contracts” or “Luxottica-certified.” Luxottica does not outsource Oakley production to China.
Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement
These indicate high risk of IP infringement, substandard quality, or fraud. SourcifyChina mandates exit if observed.
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| “Authentic Oakleys at 90% discount” claims | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Legal Catastrophe) | Cease communication immediately; report to Alibaba IP Protection |
| Refusal to sign NNN (Non-Use, Non-Disclosure, Non-Circumvention) agreement | ⚠️⚠️ (High) | Do not share specs; terminate if persistent |
| Payment terms demanding 100% upfront | ⚠️⚠️ (High) | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy |
| Generic factory photos/videos | ⚠️ (Medium) | Request live video tour showing your product in production |
| No ISO 13485 or CE certification | ⚠️ (Medium) | Disqualify for EU/US medical-grade eyewear |
| Supplier lists “Oakley” as past client | ⚠️⚠️⚠️ (Legal Catastrophe) | Verify via Luxottica press releases (none exist) |
Strategic Recommendation
- Reframe Sourcing Objectives: Target manufacturers with proven private-label experience (e.g., “aviator sunglasses OEM,” “prescription eyewear ODM”).
- Leverage IP-Safe Channels: Use SourcifyChina’s pre-vetted supplier pool (all with clean IP audits) or attend Canton Fair Phase 3 (eyewear section).
- Contract Safeguards: Include IP indemnity clauses and unannounced quality audits in POs.
SourcifyChina’s Value Add: Our 2026 Eyewear Compliance Shield™ includes:
– IP Clearance Dossier: Documented proof of design originality
– MOQ Flexibility: Factories with 500-unit minimums (vs. industry 3K)
– Customs Compliance: Pre-validated HS codes to avoid 30% counterfeit tariffs
Disclaimer: This report does not endorse or facilitate counterfeit goods procurement. All recommendations comply with U.S. STOP Act, China E-Commerce Law, and WTO TRIPS Agreement. “Oakley” is a registered trademark of Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s 2026 Eyewear Manufacturing Compliance Checklist (ISO 20400-aligned) at [email protected].
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for Procurement Manager use only. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Strategic Sourcing Insights for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Unlock Efficiency in Sourcing Premium Eyewear from China
As global demand for high-performance and lifestyle eyewear continues to rise, procurement teams face mounting pressure to identify reliable, cost-effective suppliers—without compromising on quality or compliance. “Oakleys from China wholesale” remains a high-volume search term, reflecting strong market demand. However, navigating the complex landscape of Chinese manufacturers often leads to wasted time, supply chain risks, and inconsistent product standards.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List delivers a data-driven, vetted solution to this challenge—reducing sourcing cycles by up to 70% and eliminating the guesswork in supplier selection.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Mitigates Risk
| Challenge in Traditional Sourcing | How SourcifyChina Solves It | Time Saved (Avg.) |
|---|---|---|
| Unverified supplier claims on platforms like Alibaba | Each supplier on the Pro List is field-verified by our China-based audit team | 10–15 hours per supplier |
| Inconsistent MOQs, pricing, and lead times | Pre-negotiated terms and transparent factory profiles | 5–7 hours per RFQ cycle |
| Communication delays and language barriers | Direct access to English-speaking factory reps with documented responsiveness | 3–5 business days per project |
| Risk of counterfeit or substandard quality | Factories audited for OEM/ODM capability, IP compliance, and export history | 2–4 weeks in QC validation |
| Lack of after-sourcing support | Dedicated sourcing consultant and logistics coordination included | Ongoing operational efficiency |
The SourcifyChina Advantage: Precision, Trust, Speed
Our 2026 Verified Pro List for Premium Eyewear includes only manufacturers with:
– Proven track record in producing high-tolerance, UV-protected lenses and durable frame materials (O Matter™ equivalents, TR90, acetate)
– Export certifications (FDA, CE, ISO 13485) and anti-counterfeiting compliance
– Minimum 3-year operational history and on-site audit reports available upon request
By leveraging our intelligence layer, procurement managers bypass months of trial-and-error and move directly to qualified negotiation and sampling.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Cycle
Don’t spend another quarter vetting unreliable suppliers or managing supply chain disruptions.
Contact SourcifyChina today to receive your exclusive access to the 2026 Verified Pro List for Oakleys from China wholesale—curated for compliance, capacity, and cost-efficiency.
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to provide:
– Free supplier shortlist (3–5 vetted factories)
– Sample coordination and shipping guidance
– MOQ and pricing benchmarking for your target markets
Act now—turn sourcing complexity into competitive advantage.
—
SourcifyChina | Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands | Shanghai • Seattle • Singapore
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
